There’s the devilish look on little Zoe Roth’s face in the burning house meme, Harold’s long-suffering smile, and Chloe, the little girl who became famous for her expression, somewhere between confused and distrustful, from the back seat of the family car when her mother explained that they weren’t headed to school but to Disneyland. There is the Wile E. Coyote expression, as he glances towards the Roadrunner while falling a cliff for the umpteenth time, Alf’s look when he gets bored and bangs his little fingers on a table, and Colonel Smith’s amused expression when they are about to kill him and he calmly and ceremoniously lights his big cigar. (READ MORE: A Dismal Debate for Biden: Gen Z Responds) There is the look of Jesus to St. Matthew in Caravaggio’s painting, the droopy-eyed look of Walter Matthau to Jack Lemon in the movie Frontpage, the turquoise eyes of Elizabeth Taylor, the look of Scrooge McDuck gives Donald after giving him a caning, and the look of the male toucan to the female toucan on the wedding night. There is the look of Caesar to Brutus at his assassination, the look on the face of soccer player Toni Kroos while lifting Real Madrid’s 15th European Cup, and the look of my ex-girlfriend every time I told her I was having dinner with friends from work. The beautiful, albeit botox-infused, look of Angelina Jolie, the welcoming and charitable look of St. John Paul II, the leftist banging look of Milei, and the craziest look ever played by Jack Nicholson. There are looks that welcome, that reject, that invite, that love, that hate, that amuse, that question, that emphasize, that mislead, that frighten, and that have made history. There are all kinds and for every situation, and most of them can be framed within some general category because they repeat the same patterns. (READ MORE: The Most Disastrous Debate Performance in U.S. History) And yet, throughout history, whether you look in movies or politics, sports or music, you won’t ever find a look as thunderous, as iconic, as definitive, as eloquent, as the one Donald Trump gave Joe Biden in the debate, as the president put on his particular show of confusion, hesitation, and obvious mental collapse. That look is the meme of the year. Everything was encapsulated in Trump’s eyes and his stance. If you ask me which was the best speech in the history of the former president, I will tell you it happened last night. It was that look, without saying a single word. His head was slightly raised and cocked to one side, looking towards Biden, tight-lipped frown, an undeniable seriousness in every detail, except in the eyes, where you could see that he was going to great lengths not to crack up, because, at the end of the day, Biden’s show is humanly depressing. As if the look wasn’t enough, he added the tagline, a demolishing tagline, as if he wanted to win the elections there and then, in a hurry, in a single sentence: “I don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence, I don’t think he knows either.” There will be those who consider Trump’s position an abuse in the face of Biden’s obvious decrepitude, but I doubt that politics is the right place to engage in charity work with rivals, even more so when behind the adorable old man you have behind the wild politics of postmodern socialists: taxes and more taxes, agenda 2030, skyrocketing public spending, woke depravation, and cancellation of dissent. Trump is not crushing a harmless old man, but the one who represents the spearhead of that dangerous ideology that ruins nations, that ruins people, that ruins societies. (READ MORE: Nine Takeaways From the Trump v. Biden Debate) Anyway, I can think of a great idea so that the former president does not have to bully his rival and make him bite the dust in such a humiliating way: Someone among the Democrats should have the decency to understand that the use they are making of an old, incapable, and sick man is really disgusting. Biden was already a lousy politician when he was in top form. What he is now is a bad joke. The post Winning Elections With a Single Glance appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

French voters begin the two-round process of electing a new National Assembly (their House) on Sunday, and the fear — or is it a frisson? — is that Nazis will take most of the 577 seats in the venerable old Palais Bourbon. By now, large numbers of immigrants have gone full Islamist…. About which you hear no objections from Melenchon’s La France Insoumise party. With slogans plucked from antiquity — “Fascism is at the gates!” “Vote New Popular Front!” — demonstrators make an extraordinary show of virtuous indignation against racism, police brutality, Islamophobia, and other ills of our times. Individuals claiming to be “teachers” and “feminists,” among other subcategories of substitutes for the people (popolo, peuple, popular), man imaginary barricades while littering the streets, one guesses, with non-GMO carry-outs from joints run by Asian and African entrepreneurs. (READ MORE from Roger Kaplan: Every Spring Sport Has Its Glories — And Its Shame) This from pals in France with whom I have been on the phone for the past couple of weeks, trying to figure out why President Emmanuel Macron dissolved the Assembly and called a snap election. Granted, his Renaissance Party did not have a majority in the chamber, but does he expect to get one with this ploy which is permitted under the Constitution of the Fifth Republic, instituted in 1958 by Charles de Gaulle and drafted by Michel Debre, one of his close associates and first prime minister. I mention this because the smart money is that very few people — in France, I mean — know this, and while they know who de Gaulle is they most of the time cannot place Debre. They don’t know that Debre was a Catholic of Jewish parentage who did not think well of France-bashers. Nor do they know that the pre-World War II  “popular (ie, “people’s”) front” was led by an eminent,  literate gentleman, head of France’s Socialist Party, named Leon Blum. Jewish though nonobservant, highly cultured, Blum agreed to a tactical electoral alliance with the Communists and Radical Republicans (center-leftists) in 1936 because a coalition had formed around anti-Semitic, anti-parliamentarian, anti-republican parties for the explicit purpose of overthrowing France’s constitutional order. Blum won the election, and though he waffled on foreign policy (even supported the Munich agreement), he pushed for rearmament to prepare for war with Germany. Arrested by the pro-German Vichy government, he survived imprisonment in a Nazi concentration camp and worked to restore French democracy following World War II. Apologies for the digression, but it is relevant to the present situation. Notwithstanding some wrong calls on policy, Blum never abandoned liberal democracy. He saved the “old house” of French socialism by leading a faction that after World War I rejected Lenin’s instructions to form the French Communist Party (PCF). He fought the radical left all his life and was not surprised when the PCF obeyed Stalin’s orders to support the Nazi-Soviet Pact that gave Hitler the green light to invade Poland, starting World War II. The “New Popular Front” is far from the humanism, however misguided, of the original. It is led by lifelong leftist firebrand, Jean-Luc Melenchon, whose alliance with anti-communist liberals and social democrats defies reason. Leaders of the soft left, including the Socialist Party, are joining with an apologist for river-to-the-sea anti-Semites to secure a few parliamentary seats. A Cover for Shameless Cynicism The “stop fascism” hysteria is a cover for shameless cynicism. If there is a fascist threat in France it is coming not from the Rassemblement National, led by Marine Le Pen, but from movements implanted in the immigrant neighborhoods of France’s major cities that share the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood (of which Hamas is the Palestinian affiliate). On the phone over the past fortnight, I get the impression that many in France are no less stumped than I am as to why Macron gambled on new elections. He may hope the French people, their minds concentrated as at a hanging, will return to a center-right majority. But with both Macron’s party and the remains of the Gaullists (now called Republicans) in disarray, such a majority would in most prognostications have to include the Nationalists led by Marine Le Pen. Macron has branded Melenchon and Le Pen as twin opposites, but the moral equivalence is not there. Whatever sins of anti-Semitism and racism Marine’s father Jean-Marie committed have been disowned. Marine Le Pen is rock-solid on Israel’s fight against Hamas and denounces the worst outbreak of anti-Semitism in France since the 1940s. Moreover, whereas the Melenchonistes are openly in favor of dismantling the Fifth Republic and “refounding” France along post-colonial demographics, the nationaux say and repeat they have no intention of challenging the institutions of the Republic, one of which happens to be presidential prerogatives in foreign affairs, regardless of who controls the Assembly. This has been the norm — termed co-habitation — when the legislature and the executive are controlled by different parties The decades-long habit of viewing the national movement in its most xenophobic light — a habit that, admittedly, Jean-Marie Le Pen did little to discourage (as your correspondent reported in these and other papers) — obscured, though it should not have, the connections between immigration and security. (READ MORE: The French March Against Anti-Semitism) Thus, feminist organizations and teachers’ unions protesting in the streets against fascism seem to be more concerned with the nationalists’ alleged anti-democratic tendencies than with the breakdown of order in public schools, where Islamists forbid girls to participate in sports or physical education and demand changes in the curricula to suit their views of history. Nothing perhaps could be more cruelly symptomatic of what is at the gates of France, indeed inside the gates, than the recent beating and rape of a 12-year-old Jewish girl at the hands of thugs mouthing anti-Semitic hate. And it cannot be dissociated from the far left’s apologetics for Hamas and its years-long campaign to stigmatize the police. The defender’s public order will be mobilized, with reinforcements from the gendarmerie and support from friends and allies, Bundespolizei, carabinieri, New Scotland Yard, FBI, and NYCPD, to keep the streets safe for the tourists who will be visiting during the Olympic Games (July 27-August 11). No one can object (except the Islamo-gaucheries), but where will this leave ordinary French guys and dolls? Going on in circles about this on the trans-ocean WhatsApp, it becomes clear this, in the end, is why no one gets these elections. No one gets these elections because no one wants to talk about the most important issue in France today — the loss of France to anti-French forces from within and without. No one, that is, except the Rassemblement National, which is the reason it is accused of “fascism.” Nor does anyone mention, and here you will forgive me a touch of pedantry again, Charles de Gaulle’s attitude in this matter. Yet it could not be clearer or more relevant. “Muslims, have you seen them? With their turbans and djellabas (baggy pants), you can see they are not French!” He was diagnosing a “clash of civilizations” avant la lettre, but he also was being pragmatic: “If you offer them citizenship,” (this was proposed as a way to end the war in French Algeria), “what will stop them from coming here, where living standards are so much higher?” And his famous quip: “Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises [his home town] will be called Colombey-les-Deux-Mosquees.” These well-known Gaullian lines were repeated and published in best-selling books, notably C’était de Gaulle, written by his close associate and minister, Alain Peyrefitte. No one has ever claimed these and similar statements such as the rapid doubling and tripling of the Muslim population are fabricated or do not reflect his convictions. But they are no longer recalled in public. Lately, they have been referred to in small circulation journals, such as Causeur and Revue des Deux-Mondes, that try to break through the politically correct mindset (called, aptly, la pensée unique) that cannot admit France for decades has been up against a growing existential threat from within. (READ MORE: A Message From Europe) De Gaulle was neither racist nor Islamophobic. He viewed with pride the successes of countless Muslim emigrants who, whether in humble jobs or elite professions, embraced France. However, he anticipated that there would be a normal communitarian trend in neighborhoods with a dense Muslim population. By now, large numbers of immigrants have gone full Islamist, or have been forced to by the thugs who prey on them — about which you hear no objections from Melenchon’s La France Insoumise party, which translated means “France Unbowed,” which is ironic indeed considering he has bowed to the descendants of the invading hordes stopped at the Battle of Tours by Charles Martel’s Christian army. This surely is why Pierre Rigoulot, a true Tocquevillian liberal (and occasional TAS contributor), who always opposed Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and would prefer to see Macron get his act together and start behaving like a statesman instead of a self-regarding technocrat, this time says that if the choice in his district is between a Melenchoniste and a national, he will vote for the latter. But let us remain calm, he says. The two-stage election will most likely produce another dysfunctional assembly, wherein the Islamo-left and the nationaux will command large blocs but not majorities. It will then be up to Emmanuel Macron to rise to the occasion and make do with a minority government. Maybe he will be inspired by the Games? They began as the vision of an idealistic Frenchman, Pierre de Coubertin, in the 19th century. The idea was to play fair and with generosity toward your opponents. A fine example came in the 1924 Games, also held in Paris, when the British track team, led by Eric Liddell and Harold Abrahams, showed the kind of manly virtue that the American Jesse Owens, in turn, would display in 1936 in Berlin. Come on, Manny, Manny Martel! You can do it! The post Elections in France Could Bring Extremists to Power appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

US Missiles Strike Crimea: A Tale of Dysfunction, Danger, and Doom

Why We Hate Each Other

Putting North Carolina Education Back on the Right Track

The Biden Agenda in His Own Words

Mike Johnson: Trump & Biden's Face Off Was 'The Greatest Mismatch in the History of Presidential Debates'

Helium Leaks and Mission Creep Cost Taxpayers Dearly

A publisher offered to print a number of Dr. Vernon Coleman’s books if he would agree, in public, that there are no germs.  That’s not the only crazy thing to happen in […]

We know that vaccines disrupt the regions of the brain that make it possible to socialise with others. Mirror neurons, empathy, sympathy, and intersubjectivity are all affected (sometimes turned way up, often […]