If you’re planning on maxing out the Chariot Social Link in Persona 3 Reload‚ you’ll need this guide to know the proper answers to give Kazushi Miyamoto. Getting the right dialogue choices means getting through a Social Link faster‚ and maxing them out can earn you a reward. Let’s go over the right things to say. Chariot (Kazushi) Social Link answers guide for Persona 3 Reload On 4/23‚ you’ll have the chance to sign up for the Track team‚ one of the few Clubs you can join. Just head to the Practice Field to initiate it. You’ll then meet Kazushi Miyamoto and start the Chariot Social Link. Kazushi will be around Classroom 1F on Mondays‚ Tuesdays‚ Thursdays‚ and Fridays. You should also have a Chariot Persona on you while you level up this Social Link. If you have the same Persona in your possession as the Social Link you’re upgrading‚ you’ll gain bonus points. Reminder: You’ll also need to progress this Social Link to unlock...

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. A Republican report from the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday raised alarms over possible AI-enabled censorship on a massive scale‚ reminiscent of Twitter and Facebook’s suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop exposé in 2020. The accusations focus on a series of AI tools currently under development. Financial backing for this venture has reportedly come from the Biden administration‚ leading to concerns about the permeation of political influence in freedom of speech. We obtained a copy of the report for you here. According to the report‚ the administration has invested millions of funds in AI research. The objective of this activity‚ as stated‚ is the creation of handy tools capable of targeting and suppressing “misinformation.” Once operational‚ these utilities could ostensibly be handed over to major social media platforms. Details contained in the report point towards a disturbing admission by researchers involved in the project‚ officially known as “Track F.” A series of emails reveal their belief that the average American lacks the ability to distinguish between truth and falsehood in the vast‚ complex landscape of online content. Seemingly‚ the project accuses veterans and conservatives of being particularly prone to disseminating or accepting misinformation‚ even more so than the general public. The report was submitted by the Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Government under the House Judiciary Committee‚ currently headed by Rep. Jim Jordan. It highlights how funds from the National Sciences Foundation filtered to prestigious institutions‚ including MIT‚ the University of Madison-Wisconsin‚ and the University of Michigan. The funds were funneled into a program‚ intriguingly titled “Trust &; Authenticity in Communication Systems.” The initiative dubbed “Track F” has been set in motion to recognize “misinformation‚” while also producing educational materials for those most vulnerable to false narratives. This initiative is part of a largely unnamed effort‚ the “Convergence Accelerator Program‚” which was stealthily set up in 2021 to address nationally impactful issues through high-level research. While these tools could‚ ideally‚ filter out harmful content such as child abuse or manipulative deepfakes‚ Republicans are more concerned about their potential for broader censorship. The report details researchers’ motivations to stifle public speech‚ as stated by Michael Pozmantier‚ the manager of the $13 million program‚ who broadly characterizes the project as a combatant against misinformation. Researchers at the University of Michigan suggested the potential of this undertaking to transfer content regulation from social media to government officials. An MIT researcher shared concerns with NSF officials‚ noting that “large segments” of the public are incapable of “discerning reality from fabrication on the internet.” There are apprehensions that these tools could be perfected and then utilized by platforms like YouTube‚ Reddit‚ and Facebook. This could further restrict internet users’ abilities to express themselves and access information‚ an instance reminiscent of the revelations about Hunter Biden’s laptop being quashed by Twitter and Facebook prior to the 2020 presidential election. This report is part of a larger examination into federal government efforts to inhibit speech on social media platforms. In an earlier finding‚ it was revealed that Covid origin narratives were removed by Facebook at the direct request of the Biden administration. The post House Weaponization Committee Report Warns of AI-Enabled Censorship Echoing 2020 Social Media Suppression appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Investigative reporter Lee Fang continues exploring the documents that made the Twitter Files possible – including a case where even a New York Times reporter got wrongly “shadow-banned” as a proponent of election misinformation. Fang‚ who worked with RealClearInvestigations on this latest piece‚ meant to have it out ahead of today’s congressional hearing‚ but says it will either way be a part of the House Select Subcommittee on Weaponization which goes into “social media censorship AI‚ and‚ free speech.” The NYT reporter at the center of this story is Reid Epstein‚ and the context is the prolonged vote-counting in a swing state‚ back in 2020. The state was Wisconsin‚ and this was the tweet that got Epstein in trouble: “Green Bay’s absentee ballot results are being delayed because one of the vote-counting machines ran out of ink and an elections official had to return to City Hall to get more.” Apparently‚ November 2020 was not the best time to just report the news. Even if this snippet a mere 8 minutes later got “addressed”: Epstein tweeted again‚ “Clerk has returned with printer ink!” But such apparently was the zeal not to let the tiniest bit of actual news get in the way of the narrative – even if the news was innocuous enough and true‚ that Epstein got the attention of the government and Big Tech. And not in a good way. So much so that‚ according to the Twitter Files cited by Fang‚ it prompted none other than the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “and others” to action. Like the mythical Cerberus‚ these people/agencies were determined to guard the narrative of a clean as a whistle‚ and just in general unquestionable‚ integrity and fairness of the 2020 election. The machine went into high gear immediately after Epstein’s first tweet‚ with various officials “setting the record straight” – and the thing was happening almost in real-time. Minutes apart‚ various (effectively) pro-Biden official accounts were refuting Epstein’s original tweet with an urgency that seems ill-matched with the relevancy of the original tweet. But‚ one might conclude‚ such was the fear and uncertainty over Biden’s election that no chances whatsoever were to be taken. Things escalated all the way to the DHS – even though the “escalating tweet” never actually got retracted by the reporter or the newspaper. But‚ writes Fang‚ “neither Epstein nor the Times appear to have pushed back against the shadow-ban on the tweet.” “There is no ink involved in the machines used in tabulation of the ballots‚ a fact confirmed by the state‚” said the Center for Internet Security (CIS) – “a contractor tasked with facilitating misinformation reports from a variety of stakeholders to DHS and private social media‚” writes Fang. CIS then “quickly elevated the tweet in a ‘Misinformation Report’ sent to officials at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)‚ the DHS sub-agency with a focus on policing social media.” “The legality of such measures is now under Supreme Court review‚” the investigative reporter writes and concludes: “The court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Missouri v. Biden‚ re-titled Murthy v. Missouri‚ which challenges the constitutionality of government social media interventions as a form of censorship‚ beginning next month.” The post How the DHS and Old Twitter Silenced a NYT Reporter’s Accurate Election Report appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The House Judiciary Committee has initiated legal action against Elvis Chan‚ an FBI agent that documents show was implication in prominent censorship of online speech. This move‚ made on Tuesday‚ stems from Chan’s non-compliance with a subpoena‚ directly challenging the committee’s probe into the suppression of certain viewpoints on social media platforms. The legal complaint asserts that Chan‚ who holds the position of Assistant Special Agent in Charge in California‚ deliberately ignored the subpoena under the guidance of the Department of Justice. We obtained a copy of the lawsuit for you here. The lawsuit states: “After public reporting revealed that the Executive Branch was coercing and colluding with technology companies and other intermediaries to censor online speech‚ the Judiciary Committee launched an investigation into how and to what extent agencies like the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) were working to interfere with the marketplace of ideas and suppress the voices of the American people. The ultimate purpose of this investigation is to develop legislative reforms‚ such as new statutory limits on the Executive Branch’s ability to work with social media companies and other entities to restrict the circulation of content online and deplatform users. And to do so‚ the Committee must first fully understand the nature of the problem.” The complaint goes on to say that the investigation identified Chan as a “pivotal figure in its investigation” and that “publicly available information indicated‚ and information uncovered during the Committee’s investigation to date has confirmed‚ that Chan was at the heart of the FBI’s interactions with technology companies‚ including Facebook and Twitter. The DOJ’s stance‚ which opposes the committee’s deposition and interview guidelines‚ is at the center of this legal confrontation. Central to this dispute is the insistence from Chan and the DOJ that he be allowed representation by both his personal and government counsel during his deposition with the committee. This request clashes with the long-standing policy of the committee‚ which permits only one form of counsel to accompany witnesses. The committee‚ in its lawsuit‚ has accused the DOJ of lacking legal basis for its position‚ emphasizing the constitutional authority granted to Congress to set its own procedural rules. In their suit‚ the committee highlights Chan’s self-description as a key conduit of information to these companies‚ information that influenced their decisions to restrict online content. Chan’s involvement extends beyond this case. He was previously deposed in Missouri v. Biden (now Murthy v. Missouri)‚ where two Republican state attorneys general accused the federal government of First Amendment violations by pressuring social media firms to censor certain speech‚ including discussions on COVID-19‚ Hunter Biden’s laptop‚ and election matters. Chan was a part of regular discussions with these companies‚ aimed at addressing foreign influence activities. Moreover‚ the committee’s lawsuit notes Chan’s leadership in a team of FBI agents who engaged with social media companies on the topic of “disinformation.” The post House Judiciary Committee Sues FBI Agent Over Non-Compliance in Social Media Censorship Investigation appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Sign Up To Keep Reading This post is for Reclaim The Net supporters. Gain access to the entire archive of features and supporters-only content. Help protect free speech‚ freedom from surveillance‚ and digital civil liberties. Join Already a supporter? Login here The post Block Ads‚ Boost Your Privacy‚ and Avoid Censorship With These Private DNS Tools appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Big Changes at CNN Due to Low Ratings

Retaliation Against Hunter Biden Prosecutor

EU Prez 'Bait 'n Switch' Ursula Throws a Bone to Angry Farmers

In a heartwarming tale of resilience and unexpected friendship‚ a tiny piglet named Marley‚ who narrowly escaped death after falling from a factory farm truck‚ embarks on a journey of recovery and discovery alongside Eli‚ a baby cow rescued from a dairy farm. It’s a story that peels back the layers of compassion‚ shining a... The post Tiny orphaned piglet’s whole world changes when she meets first-ever friend appeared first on Animal Channel.

Since the beginning of time‚ the mailman has been a silent yet crucial pillar of society‚ a key player in the grand scheme of civilization. Imagine a world without them—no letters to loved ones during wars‚ no fan mail to our childhood heroes (still waiting on that reply from the red Power Ranger from 1994…).... The post Golden retriever goes on adorable ‘mission’ when he sees mail truck pulling up appeared first on Animal Channel.