YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #staugustinefl #roofingsolutions #homeprotection #roofreplacement #energyefficientroof #durableroof #floridahomes #roofmaintenance #stormprotection #professionalroofing #communityassociationmanagement #orlandofl #hoamanagement #condomanagement #propertymanagement
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

FBI Admits Colluding With Big Tech to Ramp up Online Censorship Efforts Ahead of 2024 Election
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

FBI Admits Colluding With Big Tech to Ramp up Online Censorship Efforts Ahead of 2024 Election

Then it went to the Supreme Court, which lifted the Fifth Circuit's injunction in October to once again allow Big Government to collude with Big Tech to censor Americans – so much for Donald Trump's "freedom"-minded packed SCOTUS. Remember all the collusion stories we wrote about the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and its efforts to control free speech through social media infiltration? Well, we have learned that the censorship has resumed ahead of the 2024 election. The FBI just “resumed collusive efforts,” according to The Federalist, with social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to censor posts and silence influencers who are caught spreading “disinformation,” as, of course, defined by the FBI and its controllers. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, spilled the beans about it at a recent press conference, telling the media that federal agencies like the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) are once again colluding with Big Tech to “remov[e] disinformation on their sites as the November presidential election nears,” this being a direct quote from NexGov and FCW. The censorship talks between Big Government and Big Tech resumed this past March, according to Warner, right around the time oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court in the Murthy v. Missouri censorship case. After Warner dropped the bomb about all this, shocking the media, an FBI representative confirmed that the agency has, in fact, linked back up with the social media sphere to silence anyone and everyone whom the deep state does not like.Save 40% on Ultimate Fish Oil today and improve your supplement routine & experience the world-renowned powerhouse formula! “The FBI remains committed to combatting foreign malign influence operations, including in connection with our elections,” the FBI representative reportedly told The Federalist. “That effort includes sharing specific foreign threat information with state and local election officials and private sector companies when appropriate and rigorously consistent with the law.” “In coordination with the Department of Justice, the FBI recently implemented procedures to facilitate sharing information about foreign malign influence with social media companies in a way that reinforces that private companies are free to decide on their own whether and how to take action on that information.” (Related: According to censorship expert Mike Benz, the 2020 election was rigged for Joe Biden at least seven months ahead of voting day.) Deep state destruction of America As for CISA’s involvement in the scheme, CISA External Affairs Specialist Tess Hyre declined to comment, but did reveal that CISA Director Jen Easterly will be participating in an “election security” hearing in “the coming weeks.” Neither the FBI nor CISA will say when the communications with Big Tech about censorship resumed, nor have either of the two federal agencies identified the specific social media companies they are working with to silence free speech. What is worse, neither the FBI nor CISA will even define what constitutes “disinformation” in their eyes, nor will they reveal what other federal agencies are doing to make it disappear from the internet. Concerning the Murthy v. Missouri case, U.S. District Court Judge Terry Doughty issued a preliminary injunction back in July of 2023 barring federal agencies from colluding with Big Tech to censor content online of which they disapprove. “If the allegations made by Plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history,” Doughty wrote in his ruling. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that injunction last September. However, the initial ruling did not pertain to CISA, which is often referred to as the “nerve center” of the federal government’s censorship operations. Later that year, the court corrected the ruling to include CISA. Then it went to the Supreme Court, which lifted the Fifth Circuit’s injunction in October to once again allow Big Government to collude with Big Tech to censor Americans – so much for Donald Trump’s “freedom”-minded packed SCOTUS. TRINITY OF SATAN: King Charles III’s Official Portrait Is Clearly Demonic
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

UK Disinformation Unit Minutes Reveal Consideration of Placing Government Employees Inside Social Media Companies
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

UK Disinformation Unit Minutes Reveal Consideration of Placing Government Employees Inside Social Media Companies

The UK government explains its refusal to shed light on the question of whether or not its officials were directly involved with social media companies as fears those reports “would reveal its capabilities to hostile actors.” Recently released minutes from the UK government’s Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU) governing board, the Disinformation Board, provide further evidence of the authorities’ direct involvement in monitoring online speech during the pandemic but also flagging it for removal. But even this wasn’t enough for CDU, which in 2023, after several years of criticism and scrutiny by some media and privacy groups, got rebranded as the National Security Online Information Team (NSOIT). One of the moves considered by top UK officials was to “embed” civil servants in companies running social platforms, and it remains unclear if this was in fact done, writes Big Brother Watch’s Jake Hurfurt for Public. CDU was only one building block in the UK’s Covid-era censorship effort; several military units were enlisted to participate as well, most notably and controversially the 77th Brigade, whose job is supposed to be spreading misinformation, and in general, finding its “psyops” targets abroad, not at home. NSOIT (CDU) also states that it is “countering disinformation and hostile state narratives.” But these and several other outfits, as well as private contractors hired by the government, were tasked with surveillance of British citizens and suppression of those seen as “Covid measures dissenters.”Power up with Nitric Boost that’s now 40% OFF! This potent formula gives you the massive edge in strength and superior circulation for that unparalleled performance you've been looking for! And so, what scores of freedom of information requests have since revealed is that they went not after disinformation-spreading “foreign adversary” – but ordinary British citizens, medical professionals, journalists, and even politicians who were engaging in legitimate, albeit critical of the government, speech. Regarding the lengths to which the UK was prepared to go – specifically if officials actually got “embedded” in social media companies – this is unclear to this day thanks to the government’s refusal to provide access to reports compiled by Logically, a private company. Logically made millions from contracts with the British military, Hurfurt notes. Completing the picture of the web of sometimes loosely, other times tightly inter-connected entities that work hard to censor online speech, he adds: “(Logically) has a large US presence and is headed by US ex-intelligence officer Brian Murphy, who worked at the Department for Homeland Security (DHS).” Meanwhile, the UK government explains its refusal to shed light on the question of whether or not its officials were directly involved with social media companies as fears those reports “would reveal its capabilities to hostile actors.” TRINITY OF SATAN: King Charles III’s Official Portrait Is Clearly Demonic
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

European Car Makers Hitting the Brakes on Electric Vehicles
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

European Car Makers Hitting the Brakes on Electric Vehicles

Mercedes-Benz cuts electric vehicle production in half. Car manufacturers are slowing their transition to producing electric vehicles (EVs), because of low customer demand and production problems.  Mercedes-Benz announced to investors in March of this year that it is going back on its pledge to sell only fully electric cars by 2030. Instead, investors were told that the company plans to continue to make gasoline-powered cars well into the next decade. Fully electric cars and hybrids will account for only up to half of its sales by 2030.  It appears that carmakers are suffering after committing wholeheartedly to the ideological fad of EVs, rather than introducing them as a rival product in their combustion engine-dominated competitive market. While electric cars sales exploded in northern Europe several years ago, due largely to generous government subsidies backed by EU funds, sales of plug-in electric vehicles have been weaker than expected in other markets. Some more publically than others, carmakers are beginning to admit to this trend. “Unexpected developments may arise in particular from geopolitical events and trade policy,” Mercedes-Benz said in the statement. “Further supply chain disruptions and in particular, availability bottlenecks for critical components, remain a significant risk factor.”Save 10% on ALL storable food and Alexapure Pro Water Filtration Systems! Secure your independence with our delicious kits TODAY to beat the coming demand! The company explained that it would remain “strategically focused” and “tactically flexible,” regarding electric vehicle production, by monitoring demand, the growth of charging infrastructure, and changes in the supply chain. Following the announcement, the carmaker’s stock price rose 5.9% (also supported by a $3.3 billion share buyback program, according to the trade website insideevs.com). El Debate reports that the Volkswagen group confirmed in a recent press conference that it had already started manufacturing cars using a multi-energy integrated approach by producing the same car in a range of versions: gas-powered engined, plug-in electric, and hybrids. The news site points out that this approach has proven very successful as the long-standing strategy of French carmaker Stellantis. Other automakers—including Ford and Renault—have been less public about their partial abandonment of the EV project. Ford recently revealed that they’re planning for a new model combustion engine (albeit hybrid) in 2027, and Renault has launched a division named ‘Horse’ where it will produce combustion engines for markets outside Europe—possibly without having the main company name associated with it. The EU’s ban on selling new cars with combustion engines after 2035 notwithstanding, consumers still prefer gas or diesel powered cars over fully electric cars. This isn’t expected to change in the near future. TRINITY OF SATAN: King Charles III’s Official Portrait Is Clearly Demonic
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

When Boys Wore Dresses, and Other Fascinating Traditions and Conventions From History
Favicon 
historycollection.com

When Boys Wore Dresses, and Other Fascinating Traditions and Conventions From History

The tradition of girls wear dresses and boys wear pants – at least when it comes to babies and toddlers – is, from a historic perspective, a relatively recent development. For centuries, it was common to dress little boys and little girls the same: in dresses. The current clear-cut gender fashion conventions did not take ...
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Textbooks Rewritten by Governments, and Other Fake and Hidden History
Favicon 
historycollection.com

Textbooks Rewritten by Governments, and Other Fake and Hidden History

Textbooks in neighboring and nuclear armed rivals India and Pakistan notoriously teach wildly different versions of the same shared history and events. The governments of those two nations are not alone in editing schoolbooks and other materials to teach officially approved narratives, reality and facts be damned. Below are some fascinating examples of the difference ...
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

The Left’s Three-Pronged Attack on Property, Family and Religion: Part 2
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

The Left’s Three-Pronged Attack on Property, Family and Religion: Part 2

by Fed Up Texas Chick, The Tenpenny Report: In Part 1, we touched on the 45 ideals of communism. America has been under assault for a while now. After all, turning America into a communist state is the crown jewel of the cabal’s plan. Sadly, the US has achieved nearly all of the 45 “ideals”. Both […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Mitt Romney Is on the Bird Flu Train to Hysteria
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Mitt Romney Is on the Bird Flu Train to Hysteria

by M Dowling, Independent Sentinel: According to Mitt Romney, data collection on bird flu “hasn’t happened to the degree I’d like to see it so with regards to the so-called bird flu. We have the Department of Agriculture that’s doing some work; we have the CDC, which is doing some work and other agencies as […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

WHAT IS HIDING IN KING CHARLES PORTRAIT? CAN YOU SEE IT? ANY CORRELATION WITH THE BLOODY HORSE?
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

WHAT IS HIDING IN KING CHARLES PORTRAIT? CAN YOU SEE IT? ANY CORRELATION WITH THE BLOODY HORSE?

from Jim Crenshaw:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

5 Masterpieces of Early Irish Art
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

5 Masterpieces of Early Irish Art

  The Early Medieval Period in Ireland was defined by the development of the Celtic Christian church. Celtic Christianity is a form of Christianity that was common across the Celtic-speaking world during the Early Middle Ages. It was like the Latin Church in liturgical practice but it was also heavily influenced by pre-existing Celtic traditions in the area. The artwork that developed in Ireland during this period borrowed heavily from Celtic art styles as well, utilizing whorls and interlacing patterns that were initially popularized by pagan, Iron Age artisans. Some of the most well-known works of Early Medieval Irish art come from this visual tradition.   1. The Tara Brooch The Tara Brooch, c. late 7th or early 8th century, Co. Meath, Ireland, Source: Wikimedia Commons   The Tara Brooch, lauded as a national icon of Irish heritage, was rediscovered over 1,000 years after its original production and promptly became an object of fascination that spread across Ireland and the British Isles. Dated c. 710-750 CE, the brooch was rediscovered in Bettystown, Co. Meath in 1850 by either a woman or her child walking along the beach. The woman brought it to a local watchmaker who in turn sold it to the Dublin jeweler George Waterhouse.   Waterhouse gave the brooch the name “Tara,” likely to increase its value by referencing a recognizable Irish landmark: The Hill of Tara — which is about 40 kilometers from Bettystown.  The Hill of Tara is mythologized as having been the seat of power for the ancient High Kings of Ireland. A necropolis and ritual site that was in continuous use from the Neolithic to the later Iron Age, its kings acquired symbolic status in the Early Middle Ages. So, could the Tara Brooch originally have been owned by a High King of Ireland?   The high degree of craftsmanship utilized to produce the Tara Brooch suggests that it absolutely could have been. The brooch is made from multiple precious metals, such as bronze, silver, and gold, and it is thought that the brooch was constructed from around fifty, individually crafted pieces. It is highly ornamented on both sides, featuring multi-colored enamel and glass studs, filigree, and niello-inlaid insular designs that take clear inspiration from the ancient, La Tène Celtic style. The brooch also features a glass-eyed, serpentine head at the base of its pin, characteristic of early medieval insular art.   The reverse of the Tara Brooch, c. late 7th or early 8th century, Co. Meath, Ireland, Source: Wikimedia Commons   Zoomorphic brooches like the Tara Brooch were status symbols for their wearers. This was a technique utilized by elite figures from the Roman Empire that the Irish kings had also adopted by the 7th century. These brooches were made to be seen. By adorning oneself with an object like the Tara Brooch, a king could indicate the depth of his wealth and power. Curiously the Tara Brooch is highly decorated on both sides, not just on the front, signifying that the actual wearing of the brooch could have been only ceremonial and that it was truly meant to be shown off by its owner and viewed in the round.   The Tara Brooch was one of many ancient and medieval objects that captivated the Irish public during the 19th-century Celtic Revival. However, George Waterhouse dubbing it the “Tara” Brooch was likely a marketing ploy. Waterhouse, alongside a few other Dublin-based jewelers, sold many reproductions of the Tara Brooch during the Celtic Revival. Reproductions of the brooch became status symbols for their wearers that not only signified wealth but also ties to an ancient, royal Irish past.   2. The Book of Kells Christ Enthroned, from the Book of the Kells, c. 800, Columban monastery of Ireland or Scotland, Source: Trinity College Dublin   The Book of Kells is an illuminated manuscript, believed to have been made around the year 800, now housed at Trinity College in Dublin. Its origins are somewhat vague; it was created in a Columban monastery in either Ireland or Scotland. It is named after the Abbey of Kells in Co. Meath, Ireland, but some scholars believe that it was made on the Scottish island of Iona by monks of St. Columba’s order, and some others believe it was made in Northumbria.   A widely accepted theory is that monks began production on the manuscript at the Columban monastery in Iona and, after Viking raids on the island in the late 8th and early 9th century, the monks relocated to the Abbey of Kells, where the manuscript was finished. A Celtic Christian gospel book written in Latin, the manuscript contains the four gospels of the New Testament.   Chi Rho page (folio 34r), The Book of Kells, c. 800, Columban monastery of Ireland or Scotland. Source: Trinity College Dublin   The Book of Kells is widely renowned as one of the most ornate illuminated manuscripts from the period. It is made of a range of illustrated pages, from non-figural carpet pages to depictions of Jesus Christ and the four Evangelists. The manuscript was written on vellum (pages made from animal skin) and it is believed to have been made by three anonymous scribes, known today only as Hand A, Hand B, and Hand C. The manuscript’s brilliant illuminations use many of the same La Tène Celtic-inspired designs as the Tara Brooch. It is believed that the Book of Kells was primarily a piece of artwork, with the text secondary to the images, as evidenced by several misspellings and other mistakes throughout the text. Much like the Tara Brooch, the Book of Kells was designed to be looked at more than it was designed for practical use.   3. The Ardagh Chalice The Ardagh Chalice, c. 8th century, Ardagh, Co. Limerick, Ireland, Source: Wikimedia Commons   Thought of as one of the greatest treasures of the early Irish church, the Ardagh Chalice was originally discovered at the Ardagh Fort in Co. Limerick, Ireland and it was originally used for dispensing Eucharistic wine during the celebration of Mass. It was discovered in 1868 by two local boys as part of the Ardagh Hoard, which contained a cup and four brooches alongside the chalice, all from around the 8th-9th century. It is believed that the hoard was buried around the 1730s-40s, as it also contained a wooden cross from the Penal era in Ireland that was inscribed “727.”   The Ardagh Chalice is, in many ways, similar to the Tara Brooch in terms of production, style, and impact. The bowl and foot of the chalice are made of spun silver, while the exterior of the bowl is made of gold, silver, glass, amber, and enamel. It is decorated with ornate filigree and paneling and features similar insular, animal-style, La Tène Celtic designs. What is unique about the Ardagh Chalice, compared to the Tara Brooch and Book of Kells, is that it seems to be widely accepted that it would have been functional. Though clearly very beautiful, it may have been used somewhat regularly rather than strictly for ceremonies like the Tara Brooch, and it would have played a role in the celebration of Mass beyond existing for sheer beauty like the Book of Kells.   Reproduction of the Ardagh Chalice, early 20th century, Dublin, Ireland, Source: The Metropolitan Museum of Art   The Ardagh Chalice’s discovery in 1868 ensured its place as an object of public fascination during the Celtic Revival movement. Dublin-based jewelers like Edward Johnson created reproductions of it for purchase. Undoubtedly, the chalice’s reproductions would serve a less functional purpose than the original. These reproductions were not permitted to serve as vessels for consecrated wine, as they often were not wholly integrated into any kind of liturgical practice. Some reproductions, however, did end up in the collections of seminaries, for example. Reproductions of this nature may not have been used as vessels into which consecrated wine was poured, but they could be used to pour consecrated wine into another, blessed vessel.   4. St. Patrick’s Bell Shrine St. Patrick’s Bell Shrine, c. 1100, Armagh, Ireland, Source: Wikimedia Commons   St. Patrick’s Bell Shrine is a reliquary with two components: A bell and an exterior shrine. The bell is quite plain, made simply from iron lined with bronze, and dates to approximately 500 CE. The shrine is much more resplendent, made from bronze, silver, gold, glass, and rock crystal, and dates to several centuries later, c. 1094-1105. The panels on the shrine’s exterior possess a great level of detail in their ornate filigree, featuring swirling, serpentine patterns and motifs. The bell and the shrine are both significant to Irish history of their own accord; the bell is one of the oldest Irish objects with a continuous provenance, and the shrine is regarded as one of the most intricate treasures of Medieval Irish art.   The shrine was commissioned at some point after 1094 by the Uí Néill High King Domnall Ua Lochlainn and completed c. 1105 by the metalworker Cú Dúilig. The bell remained in the possession of the descendants of its keeper, Cathalan Ua Maelchallain, in Armagh until the end of the 19th century. The bell was a powerful relic, purportedly used by St. Patrick, and was used as a political tool after the shrine’s construction to legitimize Armagh as a place of religious significance. St. Patrick did establish his principal church in Armagh in the 5th century. The city remains an important religious site and place of cultural heritage.   5. The Lismore Crozier The Lismore Crozier, c. 1100, Lismore, Co. Waterford, Ireland, Source: Wikimedia Commons   The Lismore Crozier was discovered in a blocked doorway at Lismore Castle in 1814, and dates to between 1100 and 1113. It is made from a wooden staff lined with copper-alloy plates and embellished with silver, gold, niello, and glass. The crook itself is a single piece of bronze, hollow except for a small reliquary inserted in the drop. An inscription on the base of the crook confirms that it was built by a craftsman named Nechtain, and commissioned by Niall mac Meic Aeducain, bishop of Lismore. It was likely originally made for Lismore Abbey, which formerly occupied the site of the castle. The bishop died in 1113, offering a solid potential date range for the crozier commission.   The Lismore Crozier is both the only extant crozier to be inscribed and the only one whose date of origin can be closely approximated. The crozier’s design taps into stylistic influences like those used for the Tara Brooch and Bell Shrine, featuring swirling interlace and animals with open jaws and glass eyes. It is not completely intact, as it is missing some of its interlace filigree panels.   The crozier was likely produced as a symbol of religious power and authority. The Medieval Period in Ireland was a time of great political upheaval and religious reform — involving the Viking invasions, Norse settlement, and Anglo-Norman colonization — and many objects of religious significance, like the Lismore Crozier, were used to legitimize the monasteries from which they came as important religious centers. It is believed that the crozier was hidden during the later Medieval Period during a period of religious persecution and was likely forgotten when ownership of Lismore Castle shifted.   Bibliography   Koch, John T. (2006). Celtic Culture: A Historical Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO.   Meyvaert, P. (1989). The Book of Kells and Iona. The Art Bulletin, 71(1), 6–19.   Murray, G. (2007). Insular-type crosiers: their construction and characteristics. In R. Moss (Ed.), Making and Meaning in Insular Art: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Insular Art (79-94). Four Courts Press.   Whitfield, Niamh. (2001). The ‘Tara’ Brooch: An Irish Emblem of Status in its European Context. In C. Hourihane (Ed.), From Ireland Coming: Irish Art from the Early Christian to the Late Gothic Period and its European Context (pp. 211-247). Princeton University Press.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
"Oh God": Megyn Kelly Plays Bizarre Video of Diddy with a Young Justin Bieber
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 69871 out of 96825
  • 69867
  • 69868
  • 69869
  • 69870
  • 69871
  • 69872
  • 69873
  • 69874
  • 69875
  • 69876
  • 69877
  • 69878
  • 69879
  • 69880
  • 69881
  • 69882
  • 69883
  • 69884
  • 69885
  • 69886
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund