CNN’s Van Jones slammed the political Left this week after far-Left pro-Hamas protesters attacked Jews outside of a synagogue in southern California over the weekend. The pro-Hamas extremists gathered in front of the Adas Torah synagogue on Sunday morning to block entrance into the building and to disrupt a planned peaceful rally of pro-Israel protesters. “Listen, if you don’t like what’s happening in Gaza, it’s your right to protest. That’s not a problem. But you protest a policy. You don’t protest a people,” Jones said. “You don’t bum-rush a Jewish neighborhood and run up on a synagogue. That’s not protesting a policy. That’s protesting a people. And that is a cross of any line in America. And it has to be called out.” “And you have to also understand the context here. This is a neighborhood that’s already been traumatized, not just October 7th, which traumatized all Jewish communities, but that neighborhood in particular,” he continued. “Last year, in February, not one, but two Jewish men, Orthodox Jewish men, were gunned down, were shot in two back-to-back hate crimes. So you’re dealing with the community that’s already traumatized. They’re already fearful. And then you go and you do something like this.” He said that what the Left-wing group did was not a protest but a “pogrom” — an event designed to violently attack Jews. “I think it’s a little bit naive for some of the people to think that if Israel would just suddenly just stop doing what it’s doing, that rainbows and bunnies and sunshine would break out over the Middle East, it would all be fine,” he said. “The hostages have to be returned. People have called for a ceasefire, call for ceasefire on both sides. Hamas is still firing its rockets. They still have hostages kidnapped. So this is a complex issue. But here’s what’s not complicated. Politics can be complicated. Geopolitics can be really complicated.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP “How you treat your neighbors, how you treat people in your community, is not complicated. You don’t run up — I haven’t seen Jewish people running up on mosques with Israeli flags. If they did that, I’d be denouncing that, too,” he continued. “There are certain things you don’t do. It is a red line. If you want to be a part [of] protests and they say we’re going to go to a Jewish community center, we’re going to go to a mosque, we’re going to go to a Jewish restaurant, that’s not a protest. That’s the pogrom. That’s an anti-Jewish bigoted act.” WATCH: “I haven’t seen any Jewish people in America running up on mosques with Israeli flags. Protest a policy, not a people. What we saw outside of the synagogue in LA is a pogrom.” Thank you @VanJones68 pic.twitter.com/vfLmrtuDHq — Hen Mazzig (@HenMazzig) June 25, 2024

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) attacked the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court this week, claiming in an interview that the court has “gone rogue” because she doesn’t agree with their rulings. The former Speaker of the House made the remarks during an interview Monday night with CNN’s Anderson Cooper when asked if she had confidence in the court. “No, I think they have gone rogue. It’s most unfortunate,” she claimed. “But it’s unfortunate further to see what the other justices … what happened to the chief justice? Did he go weak or did he go rogue? I don’t know. And that’s the same thing with these members of Congress, if I can take it back to that, because, as tragic as that night was — and they were coming after me to put a bullet in my head. They were going to hang the — have a gallows for the vice president of the United States.” “So, no, I don’t have confidence in the Supreme Court,” she later added. “I think that some of the decisions they have — see, I respect their point of view. If they have a point of view about a woman’s right to choose, okay, but that’s not what they’re there to do, to advocate for a point of view. Run for Congress.” She claimed that the justices voted “their opinion on policy” rather than follow “the oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States.” “I want us to get back to a place where the three branches of government, as our Founders initiated, are respected across the board,” she claimed. “But I don’t have a lot of confidence in this court, unfortunately. I say that with a heavy heart.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP WATCH: WATCH: CNN’s Anderson Cooper: “Do you have confidence in the Supreme Court?” Nancy Pelosi: “No. I think they’ve gone rogue. … Did [Chief Justice John Roberts] go weak or did he go rogue?” UNHINGED. pic.twitter.com/PxI3NWSRcW — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) June 25, 2024

Who knew women could get this tall, wow

Peterson will not be eligible to hold any judicial position

'She's in full dementia. And it's so crazy — we lived it, she acted it, and now it's on us'

'The pond is currently closed'

'But his record is what is on trial here'

School choice should empower parents to select education options that align with their values, but many charter schools fail in this regard, experts warn. “School choice should yield schools with values that are aligned with those of parents,” Jay Greene, senior research fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Education Policy, told The Daily Signal in a statement Tuesday. Charter schools fail to do this because they represent a “constrained type of school choice.”  Charters require state approval “to open and operate,” and they usually need funding from big philanthropies to obtain buildings, Greene added. Greene, along with Heritage education Research Fellow Jason Bedrick and Education Freedom Institute Senior Fellow Ian Kingsbury, published a report Monday comparing charter schools unfavorably with fully private school choice options.  Greene told The Daily Signal he recommends increasing the amount of state-approved authorizers and deregulating charter schools as solutions for this issue. He urges legislators to make charter school options more similar to fully private school choice options. That would enable an array of education options that align with parental values when they participate in school choice for their children. “Because those [state-approved] authorizers and donors typically have values that are far to the left of the average parent, the range of charter options available to parents is skewed to the left,” Greene said.  By comparing the prevalence of important words and phrases in charter school handbooks to the handbooks of nearby district public schools, Greene said he and his colleagues were able to record the degree of this charter school choice issue. “We found that the average charter school was much more ‘woke’ than the neighboring district school,” he explained. In the report, Greene and his colleagues explain that parents choose to send their children to woke charter schools “either because they are among the minority” and actually agree with what is taught or because it’s the best option compared to other schools in the area.  “No parent should be forced to sacrifice their values when exercising school choice,” Greene said. Woke-ChartersDownload The post Cracks in the System: Some School Choice Doesn’t Help Parents Find Options That Align With Their Values, Experts Warn appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Newsflash: Men and Women Think Differently!

LIVE! Follow Primary Results Here on Twitchy Including Utah, Colorado, New York and South Carolina