YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #humor #nightsky #biology #loonylibs #moon #plantbiology #gardening #autumn #charliekirk #supermoon #perigee #illegalaliens #zenith #tpusa
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Editor Daily Rundown: Fauci’s Lieutenant Claims He Didn’t Know Emails Were Considered Federal Records
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Editor Daily Rundown: Fauci’s Lieutenant Claims He Didn’t Know Emails Were Considered Federal Records

Calling all Patriots!
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Man Charged With Attempted Murder Of Porn Star Who Allegedly Slept With His Girlfriend
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Man Charged With Attempted Murder Of Porn Star Who Allegedly Slept With His Girlfriend

'Gosselin admitted he had a ski mask and golf club as well as an untraceable ghost gun'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Judge Disappears For Weeks After ‘Manic’ Behavior: REPORT
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Judge Disappears For Weeks After ‘Manic’ Behavior: REPORT

'a danger to herself and to the community'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Music Legend Allegedly Had Intimidating Run-In With Diddy, His Security Agent
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Music Legend Allegedly Had Intimidating Run-In With Diddy, His Security Agent

'Publicly disrespected her yelling and screaming like a lunatic'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

PIERCE: Why I (Like Other Black Voters) Am Ditching Biden For Trump
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

PIERCE: Why I (Like Other Black Voters) Am Ditching Biden For Trump

Bidenomics has burdened Black businesses
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Scientists Grow Micro-Diamonds ‘from Scratch’ in 15 Minutes Thanks to Groundbreaking New Process
Favicon 
www.goodnewsnetwork.org

Scientists Grow Micro-Diamonds ‘from Scratch’ in 15 Minutes Thanks to Groundbreaking New Process

In South Korea, chemists have recently developed a way to grow artificial micro-diamonds in minutes, rather than days. Furthermore, the technique doesn’t require high temperatures or intense pressure, and are made “from scratch” with the potential to revolutionize the diamond industry by providing unlimited micro-diamonds for polishing and cutting uses. Gemstones are formed typically by […] The post Scientists Grow Micro-Diamonds ‘from Scratch’ in 15 Minutes Thanks to Groundbreaking New Process appeared first on Good News Network.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
1 y

The One Truly Great Scene in Madame Web
Favicon 
reactormag.com

The One Truly Great Scene in Madame Web

Column madame web The One Truly Great Scene in Madame Web At least there weren’t any games involving diapers. By Leah Schnelbach | Published on May 23, 2024 Image: Sony Pictures Releasing Comment 0 Share New Share Image: Sony Pictures Releasing About 20 minutes into Madame Web there’s a scene that so startlingly good that I’ve had to rewatch the film several times to make sure I didn’t imagine it. This is Madame Web. We’ve talked about the iconic press tour, the terrible ADR, the way the best line isn’t even in the movie. JP Brammer has made high Twitter ART from this film. But somehow, there is on this is one scene in the movie that hit me as weirdly, perfectly, emotionally true. Granted, this might just be me. But I’ve never seen it expressed anywhere as well as here. I previously invited the Venezuelan Spiders from Arachnophobia to review the film—I thought they’d have better insights than I did. (And I was right, but apologies to anyone who was bitten in that theater.) The one thing they didn’t really speak to was this scene, because, being spiders, their social structures are completely different and it probably sailed right over their adorable fuzzy heads. I hope they don’t mind if I follow up on their essay. (Spoilers for the greatest movies of the 21st Century, by the way.) The day after Cassandra Webb dies, gains psychic powers, and comes back to life, she goes to a party at her coworker’s house. The coworker? Her partner-in-paramedic-ing, Ben Parker. The party? A baby shower for his sister-in-law, Mary. Ben has convinced her to come, assuring her she can hang out with her friends, the other paramedics. Cassandra arrives at the party, and at first she hangs out at the grill with the people she’s actually friends with, Ben and their fellow paramedics. She asks for something to drink, and is given product placement a can of Pepsi. (Her repeated requests for beer are ignored, which is weird and infantilizing, but never fear, it gets much worse.) A few minutes later, her coworker O’Neil’s wife, Susan, comes put and tells her—and only her—“We’re ready to start,” and as Cassandra looks at her in confusion, Ben adds, “They’re starting, you should get in there.”   This is when it becomes clear that it’s a full-on baby shower. The men are staying out by the grill. The women—all the women—are expected inside the house. She looks back at him and he smiles and says, referring to all of her earlier worries: “No, you were right, they’re roping you in.” As she snaps a deadpan “Thank you” at him, he replies, “You’re welcome! Have fun!” As she comes into the kitchen, she introduces herself to Ben’s sister-in-law, Mary—because she’s never even met her. Everyone she knows is out at the grill, and they’re making her participate in the shower with a roomful of strangers. She says the only thing she can possible say in this situation, which is “Ben is so excited about being an uncle”, which also happens to be the funniest fucking thing you could ever say in a Spider-Man adjacent film. (Mary grimaces as Fetal Parker kicks her; “He never stops leaping around in there,” she says, implying that she’s actually pregnant with Batroc, The Leaper, since spiders don’t really leap so much.) Cassie follows up with a sentence I’ve uttered many times, to many a prospective parent: “Does it have a… name? The…?” and she waves her hand vaguely wombwards. And for a moment Mary’s expression mirrors many of my own friends’, as we watch her process the fact that this person just called her baby “it”, and seems to be only showing the barest polite interest rather than squealing and cooing like the other people at the party. Which, look. I get that the film is playing this scene for laughs, and showing the Cassie is socially awkward (and it gets worse in a minute, just wait) but I also legitimately felt seen by this scene. I like kids, once they’re, you know, out. And have personalities. There are several children in my life right now who I’d step in front of a truck for. But while they’re still baking? When they’re little wrinkly shrimp creatures? It’s just not my bag, man. And while saying this makes me feel like I’ve fully come off my hinges, I have to speak my truth: Madame Web is possibly the first movie I’ve ever seen that shows this particular interaction between women, and takes the point-of-view, and side, really, of the one with no kids. And then Mary replies to Cassie with a sentence that struck an icicle dagger in my heart: “We’re saving that for one of the games.” I have over the years been strong-armed into the communal experience of my perceived gender. There were times when, like Cassandra Webb, I explicitly said I didn’t want to share these experiences. My refusal was treated either as a joke I was making (bad!) or as simply irrelevant (worse!). There was the time a wedding DJ yelled at me and tried to refuse to do the bouquet toss until I joined the line of young-ish people who looked like me. (I did not join.) There was the time all the not-pregnant people at a baby shower had to hold glasses of ice water, tiny plastic babies, pink as flamingos, suspended in the cubes: if your baby defrosted first you “won” the next pregnancy. As I was handed a glass, older women, all mothers and grandmothers, hooted and hollered about which of us would be next. (I’m pretty sure I put my glass down on an end-table and went to the bathroom.) I attended these events, and a lot more like them, because I cared about the people who were the stars of the shows. I was happy that they cared enough about me to include me in their Special Day—and to be clear, this still makes me happy. But that doesn’t mean that I want the same type of Special Day. It didn’t mean that I wanted to be part of a public or semi-public ritual that involved at least some element of embarrassment or coercion, I just wanted to cheer my friends on and eat cake. Maybe dance idiotically. And want to be very clear: I’m not talking about people who are all on the same page. A group of gal pals having an uproarious night at a strip club, the wedding I attended where the bride handed her bouquet to a lifelong friend, a mom-to-be giggling as her friends bedecked her with bows from her gifts—these can be great! There’s a reason these traditions have lasted. But also, there are many reasons they’ve lasted, and some of those involve social coercion. When one person at the bachelorette is insisting on phallus necklaces when the bride-to-be vehemently doesn’t want them, where a mortified girl has to lift her dress and let a strange dude roll the bride’s garter up her thigh in front of a roomful if shrieking wedding-goers. (Both things I’ve seen, by the way!) The reason Madame Web (Madame Web???) touched off this cascade of associations is because it’s the first movie I’ve seen (and I’ve watched a lot of romcoms) that explicitly deals with this. And it does it from the point-of-view of the person who really wants to support the mom-to-be, but also wants to opt out of the gendered performance. I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the clothing. Cassie, thinking she was coming to a barbecue to hang out with her work friends, is wearing early-’00s bootcut jeans, a t-shirt, and a leather jacket. She’s surrounded by women in sundresses in every shade of the Easter basket. (I’m not kidding—literally there’s one other person in jeans, and one in like, ruffle-y white culottes. Everyone else is sun-dressed, hair-styled, manicured, and make-upped.) The game they play seems to be “write a fond memory of your mom on a slip of blue paper, and Mary will read from it and guess who wrote it.” (The paper is blue, and all the balloons are blue, because the unnamed baby is a BOY, you see.) Finally, she pulls a blank piece of paper, and Cassie cops that it’s hers. Since Cassie’s mom notoriously died in the Amazon, where she was studying spiders, Cassie doesn’t have any memories to share. So, was this game compulsory? Did everyone have to put a slip of paper in? My guess, given my own life experience, is yes, and that rather than lie and make something up, or announce to the roomful of strangers why she couldn’t participate, she dropped a blank piece in and hoped for that Mary would overlook it. Obviously that doesn’t happen, and when she admits the blank slip is hers, another woman tells her that she must have a fond memory of her mom. “My mother actually died uh, in childbirth,” Cassandra Webb says, and laughs, immediately trying to lighten the mood, then realizes she’s saying this to a pregnant woman. She hastily follows up with: “Death in childbirth is super rare…. I mean she chose to be way deep in the Amazon in her final month of pregnancy, hundreds of miles from any med facility, so—” Image: Sony Pictures Releasing None of these women apologize for making her play the game, or for putting her on the spot. She says she turned out OK without a mom, clearly trying to reassure everyone, but no one offers reassurance or anything remotely resembling a condolence. Mary is the only one who tries for a sympathetic expression rather than open horror—but she’s [SCRIBBLE]’s mom, so of course she’s nice. For the next game they try to guess the name of Mary’s baby. But since no one in Madame Web is allowed to say her looming infant’s name due to rights issues—THIS FILM IS A MASTERPIECE—the blue balloons keep popping every time someone almost says [BLACK SHARPIE SMUDGE].   Do you ever have the thing where you’re overwhelmed with joy that you’ve lived long enough to experience something? I guess for some people it’s the Grand Canyon, or falling in love, or, given this very scene, having a child. For me, it’s seeing Madame Web. It’s heavily implied that Cassandra’s shiny new psychic powers have told her the name because Dakota Johnson says “Hmmm?” like she’s thinking REALLY HARD about names for a baby, and a balloon explodes right next to her, and then just as Mary opens her mouth to say “Peter” two more explode at like, “the-fireworks-factory-is-engulfed-in-flames” volume. Except then it turns out that this entire scene is one of Cassandra’s psychic flashes (which she doesn’t know she gets yet), and when she asks: “Didn’t we just do this?” it gives the other women another chance to treat her like a freak. Image: Sony Pictures Releasing Fortunately, there is actually a fire, down at the docks, and she and Ben have to go rescue people. This entire scene is only three-and-a-half minutes long, but it feels like it’s from a different movie. Here Dakota Johnson’s relentless deadpan becomes a wry commentary on a role she’s unwilling to play. Her dark, casual New Yorker clothing contrasts with the popping pastels of the other women. Her social awkwardness is both explained away—she didn’t have a mom—and empathized with—these women who don’t know her are gawping at her for not having a mom. And in the end, she’s called away, back into the life and career she’s chosen—a life and career that none of the women (who all seem to know each other already) have asked about. In the context of the party, it doesn’t matter that she’s a paramedic who can drive at a breakneck pace through one of the biggest cities in the world to literally save people from death, or that all of her actual friends are out at the grill—all that matters is that she falls on the “girl” side of the gender binary, which means she’s supposed to act like the other “girls”.   The reason that this scene hit me so hard is that it became clear to me, after a couple of gender dysphoria hoedowns, that the games and rituals were all about telling me that I, as myself, am not enough. I’m supposed to catch a bouquet, so I can move on to the status of “married”, or find a drowned plastic baby in ice-melt water, so I can move on to the state of “mother”. The fact that I’ve never wanted to be married or a mother has always been treated as a joke I’m making, or a phase I’ll grow out of. Or, even funnier to me, as a delusion—surely I’ll come to my senses and realize that my priorities are all wrong! Surely I’ll realize that the life I’ve built over years, around writing, and art, and friendship, and being in my own mind, alone, testing my thoughts against the work of other writers (so, actually, not alone) is incomplete. The reason this scene hit me so hard is that the rest of the movie takes that thesis and runs with it. Cassandra completely overturns her own life to care for three teenage girls. Since they’re all, conveniently, unparented, she also has to invite them to live with her. And in the end, she even has a super specific vision/visitation from her mom, where she learns that her mom only chose to be way deep in the Amazon in her final month of pregnancy in order to find a cure for a degenerative condition that Baby Cassie had. Mama Webb risked her health and her life and eventually got shot while studying spiders, all for her child; Cassandra Webb achieves her final superheroic form (kind of) by risking her life for the teens, losing her sight, and adopting the girls. She becomes a Mom at about the same time Mary gives birth to [REDACTED]. The rest of the movie repudiates everything that made the baby shower scene jagged and interesting.   What gets me is that every decision in Madame Web seems to have been made by a person whose only exposure to film came when a movie played with the sound off in a bar, and they half-watched it while they got blackout drunk. The next day, in the haze of the hangover, they decided to make a film of their own. So how, HOW, did they manage to create one scene that’s so specific and true?[end-mark] The post The One Truly Great Scene in <em>Madame Web</em> appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Law Firms Stand to Make Killing From Blue Cities’ Climate Lawsuits Against Energy Giants
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Law Firms Stand to Make Killing From Blue Cities’ Climate Lawsuits Against Energy Giants

Law firms could reap a massive windfall from climate lawsuits that have been filed in numerous Democrat-leaning jurisdictions across the U.S., a Daily Caller News Foundation review of legal contracts found. Several state and municipal prosecutors across the country have signed agreements with private law firms to help with lawsuits against major energy corporations. These contracts, known as contingency-fee agreements, reward law firms with a percentage of the payout if the parties reach a settlement—but do not require substantial up-front payments from local governments. These agreements create incentives for activist law firms and Democratic prosecutors to collaborate on litigation against American energy companies in pursuit of hefty settlements. Prospective settlements could vary in size, ranging from tens of millions of dollars to billions, depending on how the cases play out, according to E&E News. While the specifics of the cases vary, the lawsuits generally argue that major energy companies are liable for misleading the public about environmental damage their products allegedly cause. For example, Sher Edling’s agreement with Minnesota, led by Democratic Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, stipulates that the firm will make 16.67% of the first $150 million recovered and 7.5% of any additional recovery in the state’s climate lawsuit against energy interests, such as ExxonMobil and the American Petroleum Institute. Notably, Sher Edling employees have given tens of thousands of dollars to Democratic candidates dating back to 2016, according to Federal Election Commission data. Sher Edling, along with another law firm, Tycko and Zavareei, also contracted to assist a climate lawsuit in Washington, D.C. That particular agreement caps the firms’ payouts in the event of a settlement at a cumulative $70 million. Critics say these lawsuits are based on questionable legal theories and are an attempt by special interests to enact anti-fossil fuel policies via the legal system. “Radical climate activists are bankrolling law firms like Sher Edling to try and bankrupt America’s energy producers and engage in shadow policymaking to ban fossil fuels,” a spokesperson for Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and the Senate Commerce Committee told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Obviously, these law firms do not take any financial risk in bringing these ludicrous lawsuits.” Rhode Island Official Admits State’s Climate Lawsuit Is Meant To Wring Money Out Of Big Oil: Court Docs https://t.co/ZuG4u3GMi4 — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) March 14, 2020 “On top of that, the money these activist lawyers could earn from destroying American energy companies—which must use their shareholders’ money to defend themselves against these lawsuits—shows that this effort is part of the radical Left’s ‘lawfare’ strategy to abuse the legal system and accomplish policy goals that everyday Americans do not want, while lining plaintiff attorneys’ pockets,” the Cruz spokesperson added. Ellison’s collaboration with Sher Edling on the case has drawn scrutiny in state politics. Three Minnesota Republicans—state Sens. Mark Koran and Andrew Mathews, and state Rep. Jim Nash—sent Ellison a letter in April requesting that he explain why Sher Edling’s services are needed and the extent to which Ellison and his staff were aware that the firm has received millions of dollars from left-of-center “special interest” organizations. “I am concerned that the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office is being used as a pass-through for private out-of-state law firms to sue businesses in our state,” Matthews said in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation. “It seems wholly unnecessary to give half a billion dollars to firms focused on political activism when Minnesotans currently fund a fully functioning Attorney General’s Office, which has two full-time lawyers dedicated to the litigation. Citizens in our state have a right to understand the financial, and political dynamics influencing our justice system.” While Ellison has not disclosed a specific amount that he and his team are looking to win from the oil corporations, he indicated in 2020 that a potential settlement could be comparable to the $7 billion agreement that the state reached with major tobacco companies in the 1990s, according to The Associated Press. “I and/or a colleague have filed amicus briefs on behalf of Energy Policy Advocates making clear that from the plaintiffs’ perspective—although their political base appreciates the one prong of trying to force policy through vexatious multi-front litigation that might get the defendants to sue for policy peace—this is a revenue grab,” Chris Horner, a practicing attorney with extensive experience in environmental law, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “From the firms’ perspective, this is simply a new line of lucrative business.” The implications of these lawsuits could extend beyond large payouts for lawyers. A growing list of legal experts and former senior military officials have requested that the Supreme Court pick up a climate lawsuit in Hawaii on the grounds that the litigation poses such major questions about federalism and national security that the highest court in the land should take over. The city of Honolulu is suing energy corporations, including Chevron and Shell, in that climate lawsuit, according to Reuters. A similar climate case against major oil corporations in San Francisco could be even more lucrative for Sher Edling and Altshuler Berzon, the other law firm involved in the contingency-fee structure for the case. The plaintiffs are seeking a settlement that could potentially reach into the billions from five major energy companies, according to the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office. The two firms cumulatively stand to take home 25% of the first $100 million recovered, 15% of the next $50 million, and 7.5% of recovered funds in excess of $150 million, according to the contingency-fee agreement covering the firms’ work for the city. “If private firms contract out novel cases—governments, too—the alternative is this: They try to staff up, and two things are going to happen. Their costs are going to get very high, and there are going to be front-end costs that they have to bear,” New York University law professor Richard Epstein, who co-authored one of the amicus briefs urging the Supreme Court to pick up the Hawaii climate case, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “They don’t like front-end costs they have to bear. And so, what they do is they try to contract it out in order to reduce the burden and to increase the yield. And everybody does that. I mean, the legal profession is simply rife with people.” No ‘Smoking Gun’? New York’s Climate Lawsuit Against Exxon Isn’t What You Think https://t.co/Dni0fjgYXK pic.twitter.com/xmqRxUjQ2i — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) October 25, 2018 The Hannon Law Group similarly stands to reap about 20% of any large prospective settlement achieved by the city of Boulder, Colorado, in its climate nuisance case against energy companies, according to Forbes. Three law firms—Worthington and Caron, Simon Greenstone Panatier, and Thomas, Coon, Newton & Frost—are helping Multnomah County, Oregon, which includes Portland, with its climate litigation, according to the Texas Lawyer. The firms cumulatively would take home about one-third of the first $100 million recovered, 26% of recovered funds up to $200 million, and 19% of any funds above that threshold, according to KATU-TV in Portland, an ABC affiliate. The plaintiffs in the case are seeking $50 billion, though they are unlikely to win anywhere near that amount. The office of the Oakland City Attorney declined to comment, and every other prosecutor’s office mentioned did not respond to requests for comment. Every law firm mentioned, aside from Simon Greenstone Panatier, did not respond to requests for comment. Simon Greenstone Panatier declined to comment. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post Law Firms Stand to Make Killing From Blue Cities’ Climate Lawsuits Against Energy Giants appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 y

You Can Get Anything You Want at Joe Biden's Restaurant
Favicon 
hotair.com

You Can Get Anything You Want at Joe Biden's Restaurant

You Can Get Anything You Want at Joe Biden's Restaurant
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 y

How Does Turbulence Work And Is It Becoming More Frequent?
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

How Does Turbulence Work And Is It Becoming More Frequent?

On May 21, one person died and several were injured after a flight from London to Singapore was struck by severe turbulence. Though such fatalities are rare, and turbulence is usually only mildly bumpy, some scientists believe we could be seeing more of it.What is turbulence?Turbulence is a sudden, irregular change in airflow caused by whirls of air known as eddies and vertical currents. These can be created by a multitude of features, including thunderstorms, dense cumulonimbus clouds, and even the air around mountains. Encountering this in an airplane can cause the craft to abruptly drop in altitude – a bit like a car dipping down when it hits a pothole in the road. And much like that situation, hitting turbulence in an aircraft can feel bumpy, the intensity of which depends on the severity of the turbulence.In many cases, that bumpiness is mild, and pilots have protocols in place to try and avoid turbulence where possible. This includes flying at high altitudes, but also using current weather reports, forecasts, and in-flight radars to pinpoint possible problem areas. That and, in the case of avoiding storms, looking out the massive window at the front of the plane.However, there’s one type of turbulence that doesn’t show up on weather radars: clear-air turbulence (CAT). Often found in jet streams where cold and hot air collide, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) calls it “especially troublesome” because it happens suddenly and with no visual warning. Is turbulence dangerous?Many airlines make an announcement before takeoff recommending passengers keep their seatbelt on at all times, and make sure luggage is secured, because of turbulence. The reason for that is because when a plane drops during turbulence, gravity has less of a pull on you (and other objects) than the effect of that sudden vertical motion.“What that means is that if you’re not seat belted, by definition, you’ll become a projectile, you’re a catapult, you will lift up out of your seat,” Paul Williams, a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Reading, told the New York Times.That in itself can cause people injury to themselves and others around them, as can the inevitable fall back down.Though that can have some serious consequences, as the recent Singapore Airlines incident demonstrates, turbulence-related deaths and injuries are extremely rare. According to the FAA, there were 163 serious turbulence injuries between 2009 and 2022, with the highest figure in a single year being 18.Is turbulence becoming more common?Some scientists think that turbulence, particularly CAT, is likely to become more frequent as a result of climate change – with one study concluding that the increase has already begun.A team from the University of Reading, including Paul Williams, analyzed trends in CAT across the globe over the course of 40 years. In that study, they found that by 2020, severe CAT in the North Atlantic had increased by 55 percent since 1979. This, the authors concluded, is consistent with the effects of climate change on jet streams. According to recent commentary from Williams, that means turbulence could get even more common in the future.“Our latest future projections indicate a doubling or trebling of severe turbulence in the jet streams in the coming decades, if the climate continues to change as we expect," the atmospheric scientist explained.In that case, probably best to buckle up.All “explainer” articles are confirmed by fact checkers to be correct at time of publishing. Text, images, and links may be edited, removed, or added to at a later date to keep information current. 
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 70039 out of 97923
  • 70035
  • 70036
  • 70037
  • 70038
  • 70039
  • 70040
  • 70041
  • 70042
  • 70043
  • 70044
  • 70045
  • 70046
  • 70047
  • 70048
  • 70049
  • 70050
  • 70051
  • 70052
  • 70053
  • 70054
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund