The following account, and subsequent interviews and investigation, have convinced me that the possibility of hybrid conception, gestation, and birth may be true."Hi, Lon. I have been reading your blog for quite a while, and I found many cases that involved possible hybrid children very interesting. I have decided to contact you and tell you my story.I lived with my husband for 3 years before we were married. The house was a row home with two bedrooms on the second floor. We lived in Brooklyn, New York. I often would wake up in the guest bed even though I went to sleep in the master bed. Sometimes my clothes would be changed. I thought maybe I was sleepwalking which is pretty scary, but plausible.However, the weirdest thing was one time I woke with a start in the guest bed. It felt like there was an electrical pulse deep inside my brain. I never felt anything like that before or since. We were married while still living in that house. We wanted children right away but I have polycystic ovary syndrome so the doctor thought we would have trouble getting pregnant.I was to try for six months, then go to a fertility specialist. I found out I was pregnant a few days before my appointment. Normally, it takes a healthy couple up to a year to get pregnant. We built a house in New Jersey and moved when I was 4 months pregnant. All my sleepwalking stopped when we moved.My pregnancy went smoothly until the last month when I was put on bed rest for gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. With a C-section, my daughter was born.She was a happy, content baby sleeping through the night after a month. She grew quickly and hit every milestone early. In first grade, the school came to us to test her IQ. She was just shy of genius at six years old. She has been placed in all advanced classes since then. However, she’s not your typical bookworm. She’s a tall, blond cheerleader. She has beautiful large green eyes. She wants to be an OB/GYN but she loves math to the point I will find her doing math problems on her own for fun. We had no other children.Now, I never really believed in aliens but my brother, for many years, thought that she was a hybrid. He became more convinced after I told him about waking up in the guest bed and the change of clothes.That being said, I now believe that I was abducted before we were married and that my daughter was conceived during one of the incidents. I had never brought this up with my husband. You see, my husband passed away a few years ago from Covid. I don't want to go into specifics, but I had his DNA tested, and he was not my daughter's biological father. I was never unfaithful to him.I know that this all reads like a weird novel, but it is absolutely true.The bottom line is that I would like to know if you have ever heard or read a similar situation? " FNOTE: I received this inquiry about a month ago. I have since talked to 'F' and I believe what she has told me. I only posted her account after I received her permission and after she approved this final draft. Many details are not included. I have seen the evidence, both the DNA results of her husband and her daughter. I had an experiencer tell me a similar account several years ago, but I never mentioned it on the blog or in my book. I want to be very cautious as I proceed. Lon**********WEIRDEST OF THE WEIRD 4 - INCREDIBLE ENCOUNTERS! | LIVE Chat | Q & A (REAL EYEWITNESS REPORTS!)RISSA MILLER - LEGEND OF 'HELL HOUSE' - LON STRICKLER - Live Chat - Q&A - (CREEPY MARYLAND HISTORY)PHANTOMS & MONSTERS VIDEO LIBRARYPOLL: WHAT DO YOU THINK? Vote & comment on paranormal, cryptid & unexplained mysteries!LISTEN TO NARRATIONS OF PHANTOMS & MONSTERS REPORTS & CASES - PLEASE SUBSCRIBE, LIKE & SHAREPHANTOMS & MONSTERS RADIO Podcasts on SpotifyPHANTOMS & MONSTERS READING LISTCHICAGO MOTHMAN / O'HARE BATMAN YouTube PlaylistHave you had a sighting or encounter?Contact me by email or call the hotline at 410-241-5974Thanks. LonOUR SOCIAL MEDIA LINKSBigfoot and Other Cryptid Videos on YouTubeLYCANS! - PENNSYLVANIA'S CRYPTID CANINES UPDATE'KILLER BIGFOOT' HUNTED BY U.S. SPECIAL FORCES / GLIMMER MAN / MANTIS HUMANOIDSCRAWLER HUMANOIDS - GRUESOME INVADERS! (REAL EYEWITNESS ENCOUNTERS!)WEREWOLVES: DO THEY EXIST?'DOGMAN IN OUR YARD!' - AN OHIO FAMILY'S 12-YEAR SAGA WITH CRYPTID CANINESHey, folks. Thanks for the congrats on 'The Mothman Revisited' episode on Unsolved Mysteries. As a result, we are receiving more sighting reports and are very excited and grateful for the new information!I sincerely thank the Unsolved Mysteries team and Netflix for allowing us to tell the world about this phenomenon.If you have information about this or any other cryptid or unexplained sighting or encounter, please feel free to contact me by email or at 410-241-5974. Thanks again! LonCHICAGO MOTHMAN / O'HARE BATMAN YouTube PlaylistChicago / Lake Michigan Winged Humanoid Regional Interactive MapEXCLUSIVE VIDEO of CHICAGO MOTHMAN RECORDED---------------Become a Phantoms & Monsters Radio Insider - just $2.99 monthly, and receive these perks. Thanks for your support!-Members-only live chats-Exclusive members-only videos-Priority reply to members' commentsHave perks suggestions? LMK-----YOUR SUPPORT IS APPRECIATED! THANKS-----Have you had a sighting or encounter?Contact us by email or call the hotline at 410-241-5974Thanks. Lon Noted UFOlogist Dr. Raymond Keller believes the idea of extraterrestrials and even ultra-dimensional beings from many different planets and alternate realms living and working among us clandestinely is more than just another conspiracy theory.Available on Amazon.comSan Francisco Book Festival Honorable MentionNew York Book Festival Honorable MentionAlso available with audiobooknarration by Terry Springs,CBS-TV Las Vegas affiliate.OUR PRIVACY POLICYThis blog and newsletter are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Work 3.0 United States License.Registered trademark PHANTOMS AND MONSTERS ® / PHANTOMS & MONSTERS ® - USPTO #90902480 - Lon D. Strickler© 2005-2025 Phantoms & Monsters - All Rights Reserved

Attorney General Merrick Garland intends to release the volume of special counsel Jack Smith’s report alleging President-elect Donald Trump committed crimes in challenging the 2020 election—but he’s withholding the volume on Trump’s handling of classified documents after he left the presidency in 2021.  This comes one day after U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily blocked the public release of the report related to the classified documents cases. The ruling stemmed from two defendants charged along with Trump in the documents case arguing that the public release of such a report would likely prejudice a jury and future criminal proceedings against them. “The special counsel has already transmitted the final report to the attorney general. Volume One related to the prosecution of President Donald Trump relating to the 2020 presidential election. Volume Two relates to the special counsel’s investigation and prosecution of Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, as well as President Trump, related to mishandling of classified documents,” the Justice Department’s filing Wednesday in the 11th Circuit says. “The attorney general intends to release Volume One to Congress and the public, consistent with 28 CFR S 600.9(c) and in furtherance of the public interest in informing a coequal branch and public regarding this significant matter,” the filing continues. “But to avoid any risk of prejudice to the defendants Nauta and De Oliveira, the attorney general has determined at the recommendation of the special counsel, that he will not publicly release Volume Two so long as defendants’ criminal proceedings remain pending.” Special counsel Jack Smith (Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post via Getty Images) The Justice Department filing in the 11th Circuit adds: “Volume Two will be made available for in camera review by only the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate judiciary committees upon their request and agreement not to release any information from Volume Two publicly.” Those four would be Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., on the House Judiciary Committee, and Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and ranking member Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., on the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Cannon, the judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, previously dismissed the classified documents case against Trump on the grounds that Smith’s appointment as prosecutor was not constitutional. The Justice Department appealed the ruling, which is still pending.  After the November election, Smith announced he would drop charges against Trump, because Justice Department guidelines say a president should not be prosecuted while in office. However, the case against defendants Nauta and De Oliveira in the classified documents case continued. Those defendants, Nauta and De Oliveira, have asked the court to block the release of the entire report. So, Garland should at least wait until the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals makes a decision on that point, Paul Kamenar, legal counsel for the National Legal and Policy Center, a watchdog group that initially raised questions about the constitutionality of special counsel appointments.  “The attorney general would be on shaky ground and presumptuous to release one volume of the report before the 11th Circuit decides,” Kamenar told The Daily Signal.  Still, such a report would be almost irrelevant if Smith’s appointment was unlawful.  “The special counsel already gave the report to the attorney general. So, they are saying the cat is already out of the bag, and it’s up to the attorney general whether to release the report,” Kamenar continued. “I would argue that Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional for both cases.” The DOJ filing says the two remaining defendants “have no cognizable interest in that volume of the final report” and no legal standing to challenge the portion accusing Trump of wrongdoing for challenging the outcome of the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden.  It’s unclear what, if anything, new would be in Smith’s report regarding the election case that would be different from the indictment of Trump in the election case or the report by the House Select Committee Investigating the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol.  The filing acknowledges the defendants argued the special counsel was unlawfully appointed. The DOJ says that is “irrelevant to the only action here at issue—the handling of the final report by the attorney general.”  “The district court in dismissing the indictments against the defendants did not purport to enjoin the operations of the special counsel nationwide, nor could it have properly done so in this criminal case,” the DOJ brief argued Wednesday. It later adds: “What the defendants ask this court to enjoin is not any action by the special counsel, but the attorney general’s authority to decide whether to make such a report public.” SmithReportCourtFilingDownload The post Garland Wants to Release Smith Report on 2020 Election but Hold Off on Trump Documents Case appeared first on The Daily Signal.

An essay appeared recently in The Wall Street Journal under the headline “What Happens When a Whole Generation Never Grows Up?” Behavior that has always been understood to define what it means to be an adult is disappearing among America’s younger generations. Institutions always seen as the sinews that define and hold together a society–homeownership, marriage, children–no longer can be taken for granted. Per the essay, median age for first-time homebuyers is at an all-time high: 38. In 1981, it was 29. Around half of Americans between 30 and 40 are married, compared to two-thirds in 1990. Fertility rates–the average number of children that each woman of childbearing age can be expected to bring forth–is at a level that guarantees an aging, shrinking society. A fertility rate of an average of 2.1 children per woman will keep a population at steady state. Below this, the population shrinks. The fertility rate stood at 1.62 in 2023. It only reached 2.1 once since 1971–in 2007. Per the Pew Research Center, as noted in the essay, “The share of childless adults under 50 who say they are unlikely to ever have kids” rose from 37% in 2018 to 47% in 2023. If all of this doesn’t offend your moral sensibilities, it should for sure offend your practical sensibilities. Absence of births means an aging population. Median age of the U.S. was 29.5 in 1960. In 2023, it was 39.2. The aging population is one major reason for Social Security’s fiscal problems. Retiree benefits are paid by those working and paying payroll tax. The system breaks down when the number of retirees per worker grows. An aging population means higher national health care costs. In 2021, the percent of the population 55 and above was 31%. But those 55 and above accounted for 56% of national health care expenditures. If the disappearance of marriage, children, families and home ownership is a problem, is there a solution? The Wall Street Journal essay has little to offer. To suggest this reflects that the financial pressure that our youth feel is no answer. For the full decade of the Great Depression, from 1930 to 1940, fertility rates never dropped below the 2.1 replacement rate. It is closer to the truth that our young people act this way because they have grown up in a culture that teaches them to act this way. Marriage and monogamy are not natural. They are religious values that are taught. In a culture that has purged religious truth, egotism and secular humanism take its place. Why let a spouse or children impinge on your personal space? A legacy of the now late President Jimmy Carter was the creation of two new federal Cabinet-level departments. He signed into law the Department of Energy and the Department of Education. Apparently, Carter, who was very public about his Christian faith, did not see a conflict in growing government and his Christian values. But as is well-known, the Department of Education initiative was, at least in part, the result of his effort to ingratiate and get support from the nation’s largest teachers union, the National Education Association. A short visit to the websites of the NEA and the American Federation of Teachers–the major teachers unions–will show that the values being advanced there are the wokeism and secular humanism that drive the collapse of marriage, family and children. It is these values that are conveyed in America’s public schools. Step one in our battle against this social and cultural destruction is to support President-elect Donald Trump’s effort to disband the Department of Education. Step two should be a nation-wide effort to change our education paradigm and create a new regime that gives parents control over where to educate and how to educate their children. COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Jimmy Carter and the Unraveling of American Culture appeared first on The Daily Signal.

It’s no secret that culture has heavily influenced politics over the years. Gay couples appeared in movies and TV shows long before the Supreme Court’s legalization of same-sex marriage nationwide in 2015. Likewise, Marxist and socialist ideals have been glorified in Hollywood, making way for those ideas to be promoted by lawmakers in Washington.  Now, conservative politics appear to be influencing culture in a way that has not been seen for some time.  The political right watched in surprise Tuesday as Mark Zuckerberg, the chairman and CEO of Meta, Facebook’s parent company, announced that Meta is embracing a free-speech model. Zuckerberg explained that Meta, which also includes Instagram, will end its use of “fact-checkers” and will instead move to a community-notes style of moderation, such as the one that the platform X currently uses.  “The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech,” Zuckerberg said in a video announcing the changes. “So, we’re going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms.”  This is an absolutely incredible pro- free speech statement and only happened because Trump won. pic.twitter.com/wxynMjc8N6— Bethany S. Mandel (@bethanyshondark) January 7, 2025 The shift doesn’t stop there. Before the 2024 presidential election season, few cultural figures openly expressed conservative views, but now everyone from Elon Musk to actor Zachary Levi to filmmaker Justine Bateman are speaking out freely about the conservative policy views they support.  On this week’s edition of “Problematic Women,” we examine some of the ways in which the 2024 election has already begun to affect American culture.  Also on today’s show, we discuss why Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau chose to announces his resignation, the bipartisan passage in the House of the Laken Riley Act, and opine over the engagement of actress-singer Zendaya and actor Tom Holland. Watch the show above. The post Plot Twist: Are Conservative Politics Shifting Culture? appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Someone needed to fill the delusional, pretentious void left by Paul Krugman at The New York  Times to tell Americans they’re too stupid to realize the God-Bless-America awesomeness of the Biden economy. It looks like Chief White House Correspondent Peter Baker volunteered. Baker used a Jan. 5 news item to clap back at President-elect Donald Trump for denigrating Bidenomics and wound up insulting Americans in the process. “President Biden is bequeathing his successor a nation that by many measures is in good shape, even if voters remain unconvinced.” In other words, darn those uneducated plebeians! But it got worse. Baker took his insulting nonsense a step further: “[T]he America that Mr. Trump will inherit from President Biden when he takes the oath for a second time, two weeks from Monday, is actually in better shape than that bequeathed to any newly elected president since George W. Bush came into office in 2001.” Uh, What?! [Emphasis added.] Baker, of course, adopted a typical Krugman strategy of blurting out cherry-picked statistics devoid of context: “Jobs are up, wages are rising and the economy is growing as fast as it did during Mr. Trump’s presidency. Unemployment is as low as it was just before the Covid-19 pandemic and near its historic best.” He also propagandized how “roaring stock markets finished their best two years in a quarter-century.”  Oy vey, where do we begin? First, the so-called growth Baker is alluding to is misleading. Much of that economic growth is being bolstered by a government debt bomb. What’s amazing is that Baker even conceded in a buried paragraph that “the national debt has ballooned so much that it now represents a larger share of the economy than it has in generations, other than during the pandemic itself.” Hello! [Emphasis added.] America is also in the midst of battling a major labor shortage, as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce pointed out in a Dec. 13 report. “Even if every unemployed worker were to fill an open job within their respective industry, there would still be millions of unfilled job positions, highlighting the widespread labor shortage,” the Chamber summarized. Did Baker bother mentioning that? Nope. Another big chink in the armor of Baker’s argument is that inflation had caused stock markets to “appear stronger than they really are and [are] cutting into returns for everyone, including those with retirement accounts,” as Heritage Foundation Senior Research Associate Alexander Frei noted in an Oct. 31 column. Take a guess if Baker bothered to disclose this. As far as wages go, a September 2024 Bankrate study found, “The past 16 months of ‘real’ wage growth — as economists have called it — haven’t been enough to offset the 25 months where prices were rising disproportionately faster than Americans’ paychecks.” New Statista research found that “Despite the level of wage growth reaching 6.7 percent in the summer of 2022, it has not been enough to curb the impact of even higher inflation rates.” In addition, “Without appropriate wage increases, Americans will continue to see a decline in their purchasing power.” In fact, according to some estimations, the U.S. dollar has lost about a fifth of its value.  Again, Baker wound up undercutting his own premise by admitting in a buried portion of the ninth paragraph that “Families remain pressed by the cost of living, including housing, health care and college tuition.” Even Bloomberg News reported Nov. 19 that more than half of Americans are struggling to pay bills and save money. Economist Dan Mitchell wrote Dec. 27 that “families, at best, were on a treadmill during the Biden years. There was little o[r] no increase in household income after adjusting for inflation.” Gee, no wonder Americans are convinced the Biden economy sucks, right Baker? Duh!  But Baker couldn’t resist trotting out some pro-Biden lackeys to help support his talking points like lefty Moody’s Analytics economist Mark Zandi, who absurdly told him that “‘taking the economy in its totality, it rarely performs better than it is now as President Trump takes office.’” Baker didn’t bother correcting this falsehood of course. The Economist measured the economic performance for ”37 mostly rich countries” in 2024 by combining GDP growth, stock market performance, core inflation, unemployment and government deficit. As National Review senior political correspondent Jim Geraghty first pointed out about The Economist’s analysis, the U.S. is ranked 20th overall, “in what can at best be called a very mixed bag — ranking ninth among the 37 countries in GDP, fourth in stock market performance, 23rd in inflation, 29th in change in unemployment rate over the past year, and 31st in estimated deficit growth compared to GDP.”  Baker could certainly give Karine Jean-Pierre a run for her money as Biden’s de facto Press Secretary. Baker, true to form, just proceeded to accuse Americans of just either being short-sighted by their own circumstances, dismissive of stats, or being dumb Trump sheep: Indeed, many Americans do not perceive the country to be doing as well as the data suggests, either because they do not see it in their own lives, they do not trust the statistics or they accept the dystopian view promoted by Mr. Trump and amplified by a fragmented, choose-your-own-news media and online ecosphere. Hey Krugman, come get your boy.  

Elon Musk may be Donald Trump’s new right-hand man, but Americans across the country are beginning to question his allegiance to the red, white, and blue — after the latest H-1B controversy that’s taken over right-wing political debate. The debate began when Trump appointed India-born Sriram Krishnan to be his administration’s policy advisor for AI, and supporters pointed out that Krishnan has supported increasing the immigration of skilled workers. Trump supporters argued that this directly contradicts Trump’s America First policy. Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk chimed in, siding with Krishnan’s immigration stance — before Americans found out that Elon would hire an immigrant over an American if they were more skilled. The pair also claimed in a series of posts on X that Americans have been conditioned through their culture to be lazier than immigrants from places like India. Musk even responded to a critic on X: "The reason I’m in America along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla, and hundreds of other companies that made America strong is because of H1B. Take a big step back and F*CK YOURSELF in the face. I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend." Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” and her father, Ron Simmons, aren’t so sure Musk is doing the right thing. “Like everything, nothing is simple. It’s a complex subject, and if we want America first, then we need to have the brightest in certain areas,” Simmons tells Stuckey. “Now, would we prefer them to be American citizens? Absolutely, 100%. There is truth about our education system, as you know, our education system fails our kids day in and day out. The public education system does and that’s where the core of this issue begins,” Simmons explains. Incoming President Donald Trump has been playing with the idea of “abolishing the Department of Education,” which Simmons believes could be a good start. “It should go right back down to where the parents have the most control. That’s how you get schools to be better. But in the meantime, if we do want these technologies that we need to control and be the leader in, we do need to have the brightest people,” he says. “I will say that we should look for American citizens first,” Simmons continues. “It doesn’t need to be a level playing field, in my opinion. In that, we should try to hire as many citizens as we can and we’ve got a lot of them that maybe are being passed over because of the wage thing.” Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

An Ohio police officer has accused a sheriff’s office of arresting her "without evidence," taking her young child away from her, and circulating "explicit" photos obtained from her cell phone, according to a new lawsuit. Deputies with the Portage County Sheriff’s Office pulled over Miranda Brothers — an officer with the Mantua Police Department — on Jan. 1, 2024.'Despite knowing that the digital images were not relevant to any criminal charge, Detective John Doe shared and/or disseminated these digital images within the Portage County [Sheriff’s] Office and potentially further.'WOIO-TV obtained police bodycam video of the traffic stop. Brothers is seen getting emotional when deputies remove her child from her vehicle. Brothers is seen on bodycam video saying, "You’re gonna take custody of my kid? For what?”The deputies accused Brothers of leaving her 5-year-old son alone with a registered sex offender. The deputies then took her child away from her, and Brothers was arrested.The next day, sheriff's office Detective Kenneth Romo charged Brothers with one count of endangering the welfare of a child.Bodycam video shows a deputy using a search warrant to seize Brothers' cell phone. Brothers allegedly gave officers her child's tablet voluntarily. Brothers was transported to the sheriff’s office, where detectives questioned her. Her child was temporarily placed in foster care.The Portage County Sheriff’s Office accused Brothers of allowing a registered sex offender "to spend extended periods of time alone with the then-5-year-old child.”Mantua Mayor Tammy Meyer immediately placed Brothers on administrative leave after her arrest. Detectives said multiple people tipped them off about the alleged crime.According to the complaint, "at least" two detectives with the Portage County Sheriff’s Office were deployed to observe Brothers and her child on Dec. 7, 2023, at a restaurant in Mantua — a village about 40 miles southeast of Cleveland. The Portager reported that sheriff's office Detective Mischell Weber oversaw the investigation but testified under oath that the complaints about child endangerment were “unfounded” and “not accurate.”Sheriff's office Detective Eric Noall later testified that the child never had "any unsupervised contact with a registered sex offender," according to court documents.The lawsuit claims that four detectives testified in December 2023, and none of them personally observed the child being supervised by a registered sex offender or that the child was in any danger.On July 11, 2024, Portage County Municipal Court Judge Mark Fankhauser dismissed the case against Brothers.Once the case was dropped, Brothers was reinstated at the Mantua Police Department.Last week, Brothers filed her complaint against the Portage County Sheriff’s Office.'As a result of the Portage County Sheriff’s Office’s conduct, Plaintiff Brothers suffered serious mental anguish of a nature no reasonable person could be expected to endure.'The lawsuit states, "The criminal complaint directly contradicts the sworn testimony of the members of the Portage County Sheriff’s Office who personally observed Juvenile A on December 7, 2023."The Portage County Sheriff’s Office reportedly performed a forensic investigation on Brothers' cell phone, which copied her phone's data to a computer database.Sheriff's office Detective Michael Hanna allegedly testified that there was no incriminating evidence regarding the child endangerment allegations on Brothers' phone. The suit also accuses an unnamed member of the sheriff's office of looking at “private digital images” from Brothers' phone and circulating them. "Despite knowing that the digital images were not relevant to any criminal charge, Detective John Doe shared and/or disseminated these digital images within the Portage County [Sheriff’s] Office and potentially further,” the suit states. “The Portage County Sheriff’s Office’s conduct of observing, sharing and/or disseminating the private digital images of Plaintiff Brothers was so extreme and outrageous that it went beyond all possible bounds of decency and is intolerable in a civilized community.”Brothers' attorney, Eric Fink, confirmed to WOIO that the photos were "explicit in nature." Fink told the station, "She took her child to her babysitter who was at a restaurant in Mantua, she was scheduled to work in Mantua. Her babysitter is an off-duty police dispatcher, background checked. While she was there, the sheriff’s department set up a couple of detectives who were photographing and looking to determine apparently whether she left her child with a registered sex offender instead of the babysitter police dispatcher.”The lawsuit names the defendants as the Portage County Board of Commissioners, the Portage County Sheriff's Department, Portage County Sheriff Bruce Zuchowsky, Detective Kenneth Romo, and the unnamed detective.The lawsuit states, "As a result of the Portage County Sheriff’s Office’s conduct, Plaintiff Brothers suffered serious mental anguish of a nature no reasonable person could be expected to endure."The lawsuit claims Brothers was subjected to malicious prosecution, violations of her Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and 14th Amendment rights, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and tortious interference because she was suspended from her police officer job. The suit is asking for at least $25,000 in compensatory damages and punitive damages of $500,000 per defendant.The Portage County Sheriff’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the New York Post and WOIO. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A chilling story has emerged: A whistleblower, claiming to possess knowledge of advanced military technologies and covert operations, took his own life in a shocking explosion outside the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. He left behind a manifesto filled with claims so extraordinary they sound like science fiction. Yet if even a fraction of them prove true, the implications are staggering and demand immediate attention. This whistleblower alleges that the United States and China developed “gravitic propulsion systems,” technologies that manipulate gravity itself to enable silent, undetectable flight at unimaginable speeds. According to his claims, these systems are not theoretical — they are operational, deployed both in the United States and China. If true, this would render conventional defense systems obsolete, fundamentally altering the global balance of power. America’s founders warned us about unchecked government power. Today, their warnings feel more relevant than ever. Imagine aircraft that defy radar, heat signatures, and missile defense systems. They carry massive payloads, conduct surveillance, and operate without a sound. If such technologies exist, they pose a national security threat unlike any we’ve faced. But why haven’t we been told? If these claims are false, they must be debunked transparently. If true, the public has a right to know how such technologies are being used and safeguarded. The whistleblower’s manifesto goes farther, claiming that with this technology, the United States and China developed and deployed the infamous drones that were seen across the United States starting late last year. He alleged that China launched them from submarines along the U.S. East Coast, calling them “the most dangerous threat to national security” because of their stealth, ability to evade detection, and unlimited payload capacity. He ties this advanced technology to other surveillance systems, creating a network so advanced it makes our current intelligence capabilities look primitive. These claims may sound far-fetched, but they highlight a deeper issue: the cost of government secrecy. Not knowing — and not being told — fuels distrust and speculation. Without transparency, these incidents dangerously erode public confidence in our leaders and institutions. The cost of secrecy Beyond technology, the manifesto also alleges moral failures, including war crimes and deliberate cover-ups during U.S. airstrikes in Afghanistan. In one particularly harrowing claim, the whistleblower describes attacks in Afghanistan’s Nimroz Province in 2019. He alleges that 125 buildings were targeted, with 65 struck, resulting in hundreds of civilian deaths in a single day. Even after civilians were spotted, he claims, the strikes continued knowingly and deliberately. The United Nations investigated similar incidents and confirmed civilian casualties during these operations. However, the whistleblower’s accusations go farther, implicating high-ranking officials, the Department of Defense, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Central Intelligence Agency, and even top military generals in a broader pattern of deceit, eroding the moral integrity of our military and government. Whether these specific claims hold up, they underscore a larger issue: Secrecy breeds corruption. When people in power hide their actions and evade accountability, they break trust — and everyone pays the price, not just those at the top but also the citizens and soldiers they serve. Transparency is an imperative America’s founders warned us about unchecked government power. Today, their warnings feel more relevant than ever. From the COVID-19 pandemic to the Capitol riot on January 6 to the potential misuse of advanced technologies, the American people have been kept in the dark for too long. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and sunlight is coming. Transparency must become our rallying cry. As we look to the future, we must demand accountability — not just from those we oppose politically but from all leaders entrusted with power. This isn’t about partisanship; it’s about preserving our nation from self-destruction. As we enter a new chapter in our nation’s history, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Whether it’s uncovering the truth about advanced technology, holding perpetrators of corruption accountable, or seeking justice for war crimes, we must act. This isn’t just a call to action — it’s a moral imperative. Our strength lies in our unity and our resolve. The powerful fear an informed and vocal citizenry. Let’s prove them right. By demanding transparency and accountability, we can restore trust and ensure that the government serves the people — not the other way around. Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.

WATCH: Firefighter Saves American Flag From Los Angeles Inferno

VIP Gold Show: We Survived Jan 6th and Joe Biden Is Loading the Moving Truck As We Speak