According to former White House, CIA, and Pentagon advisor Jim Rickards… … the swift market rally that’s taken over the headlines since Election Day is just the tip of the iceberg. This is just the start. The first inning. That’s because, according to Jim, Trump’s on the verge of unveiling his second term playbook, including plans for what Jim calls Trump’s “Project Independence.” “Project Independence” has the potential to put huge new gains in the hands of everyday, hard working Americans like YOU. After years of inflation and high interest rates… FINALLY we’re on the verge of an economic boom only Trump could engineer. Jim shares everything you need to know – right here But hurry… as “Project Independence” gets rolling, the gain opportunities won’t last forever PS – Jim says fast-movers who act now could have the chance to turn as little as $10,000 into $265,000 by Inauguration Day. That’s just how swift and powerful the “Project Independence” market boom could be! Click here now to see what Jim’s found. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)

Joe Biden announced Thursday that the federal government will cover 100% of the costs for the initial response to the Southern California fires for six months. The funding would go toward debris removal, temporary shelters, salaries for first responders and more for 180 days. Meeting with federal officials at the White House, Biden said the funds would go toward debris removal, temporary shelters, salaries for first responders and more for 180 days. Read more: https://t.co/6LxqIsuRiX — unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) January 10, 2025 Per ABC News: Biden said he emphasized to California officials they should “spare no expense to do what they need to do.” He also had a message for residents impacted by the ravaging fires: “We are with you. We are not going anywhere. To the firefighters and first responders, you are heroes.” “The cost of the debris cleanup is gigantic, gigantic. The cost of replacing the housing is almost exponential,” he continued. “Anybody can give you a number now, they have no idea what they’re talking about. It’s big, big, big.” He added, “I’m going to make an appeal right now to the United States Congress. They’re going to have to step up when we ask for more help to get people the kind of – they need, to get the kind of help they need. Because it really does matter.” As Biden spoke, five fires were spreading around the Los Angeles area. Roughly 28,000 acres had been scorched and hundreds of thousands of people evacuated. At least five people died in the fires, and many more injured. While Biden said California would have 100% of costs covered, Hurricane Helene victims were kicked out of temporary shelter in freezing temperatures. According to WLOS News 13, thousands of North Carolina households are scheduled to lose FEMA assistance as brutal winter weather approaches. The outlet reports 3,500 households will lose their Transitional Sheltering Assistance (TSA) from the agency. Thousands Of North Carolina Households Scheduled To Lose FEMA “Transitional Sheltering Assistance” Amid Freezing Temperatures X users noted the difference in response between the two geographic locations: SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT… JOE BIDEN IS PAYING 100% OF CALIFORNIA FIRE RECOVERY WHILE #WNC FAMILIES HERE JUST NOW GOT A MEASLY 24 HOUR EXTENSION OF THEIR HOTEL STAY SO FEMA DOESN’T KICK 3,000 OF THEM OUT INTO THE ICE AND SNOW?!! WHAT IS HAPPENING?! https://t.co/K4DLxd6VS5 — Matt Van Swol (@matt_vanswol) January 10, 2025 It’s absolutely unbelievable that people in North Carolina are still living in tents in the snow and the federal government did absolutely nothing for these people, but Joe Biden has already pledged to provide California 100% support for these fires. 1/20 can’t come soon enough.… — Insurrection Barbie (@DefiyantlyFree) January 9, 2025 WATCH: BREAKING - Joe Biden has announced that the federal government will cover 100% of the cost of all necessary life-saving measures in California. Where was this for Hurricane Helene? pic.twitter.com/ELbLLS0Rjy — Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) January 9, 2025 CBS News reports: The 100% disaster response coverage from the federal government for the next 180 days is an increase from the current 75% the president previously allotted, and more than the 90% Mr. Biden said California Gov. Gavin Newsom requested. The damage is expected to be one of the most expensive disasters in California history. Three fires are still raging, the president said, and 179,000 people have been forced to evacuate their homes. Congress may need to pass supplemental funding to buoy rebuilding efforts, and the president urged Congress to "step up." "I'm going to make an appeal right now to the United States Congress," he said. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has been working with displaced locals to get them immediate supplies, like baby food. The president said the federal government will help people there not just recover, but eventually rebuild.

President Trump has officially now been sentenced in the so-called “Hush money case” after the Supreme Court voted 5-4 in a decision to not intervene. BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Against President Trump, Amy Coney Barrett Sides With Liberal Judges As a result, the sentencing has gone forward this morning. But is it all bad news? I'm going to do something I don't often do, but we're going to go to CNN and legal expert Elie Honig who makes a valid argument that President Trump actually picks up a nice benefit by now having this step completed. Elie Honig explains why Trump ‘actually gets a benefit’ by being sentenced https://t.co/hGvJhOy8wa — ???CheshireCat(Judith)??? (@Chesspuss7) January 10, 2025 You can watch the clip here: Backup clip here in full video player with transcripts if that's better for you: BREAKING: CNN legal expert explains why President Trump actually gets a nice benefit from today's sentencing. pic.twitter.com/EGliO9gqCm — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) January 10, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Kaitlan Collins: Speaking to reporters right after the Supreme Court order came down. I'm going to turn to CNN's Elie Honig, who is joining me here. Elie, you see Donald Trump. He is at Mar-a-Lago there. That means he is going to be appealing virtually—or appearing virtually—tomorrow. We'll get to that in a moment. But on this decision, everyone was waiting to see what it said. Even people in Trump world that I've been talking to were kind of divided on whether or not the Supreme Court was going to take their side. Were you surprised by this? Elie Honig: I was surprised it was this close, Kaitlan. We were one vote away from the U.S. Supreme Court preventing Donald Trump from getting sentenced by Zoom to essentially nothing. I mean, that would have damaged the Supreme Court's credibility beyond all recognition. And I think the opinion that came down 5 to 4, letting the sentencing go, was perfectly sound. Basically, the justices in the majority said two things. First of all, they said, "What's the harm? You're going to get sentenced to nothing. You can do it by Zoom. You can roll out of bed and do it." And second of all, they acknowledged that Trump may have substantial issues on appeal. I think he has substantial issues on appeal. But you can handle them through the full appeal process that follows sentencing. They're saying, "You don't need to do this right now. There are normal channels to handle this." But Trump just doesn't want it to happen before he becomes president. And you know what's maybe ironic about it? Trump actually gets a benefit by being sentenced tomorrow, which is once that sentencing is over—as of tomorrow morning—then he can take his full appeals. He can go up the New York courts of appeals. He can go maybe to the U.S. Supreme Court and say, "The charge against me was unconstitutional," which I think it may be. He can argue that the jury was not properly instructed. But if he had gotten his way—if he was not sentenced tomorrow—he would not have been able to appeal. That would have been it. So this sentence would have sort of died in a netherworld. And part of their argument had been that it was going to be too tough for him to get sentenced tomorrow, that he couldn't show up to the sentencing in New York. The justices made a point—the five who ruled that this could happen—and said that it was relatively insubstantial in light of what the court is saying they're going to do, which is to impose that sentence of unconditional discharge. And it's a brief virtual hearing. He doesn't have to be there in person tomorrow. So this was a smart move by Judge Mershon because he said last week, "I'm going to sentence you to essentially nothing, and you can do it by Zoom." If Mershon had not done that, if he had just said, "Appear for sentencing Friday; it'll be like any other sentencing—you don't know what you're going to get until I tell you," that might have changed the Supreme Court's calculus. Because Trump's argument was, "I could be subject to what we call irreparable harm." And if Trump was able to say, "I don't know, maybe this guy's going to try to lock me up. Maybe he's going to impose some serious penalty. Maybe I don't have the time as president-elect to travel to New York and sit in a courtroom and go through security." Instead, Mershon absolutely minimized that. OK, so he appears virtually via—I'll call it Zoom; I don't even know what it is for the court system. When you get sentenced, you have an option to say something, right? You just hit on what the biggest point is going to be to watch for tomorrow. Any defendant at sentencing absolutely has a right to speak. Almost always, they do. So Trump might say, "I have nothing to say, Your Honor," or he might give us a rant. I mean, I would bet on that because, look, he's got nothing to lose. He knows he's getting sentenced to nothing. So watch that part. Even if he speaks before the sentencing and goes off on the judge, which he does and did tonight, that won't change how Mershon sentences him. Mershon left himself a tiny bit of wiggle room, right? He didn't say, "I promise I will sentence you." He said, "I intend to sentence you." But I think it would take an awful lot to push Mershon from sentencing to unconditional discharge to lashing out with a sentence. Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Roberts, Alito—they were willing to stop this. What's the make of that argument? Their argument would be, as a purely procedural matter, Trump was still in the process of appealing based on immunity. We got the immunity ruling six months ago. And if you look at it a certain way procedurally, while you're appealing on immunity as a defendant, you're entitled to a complete stay—meaning no trial, no sentencing, no nothing. But the majority—and again, Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined with the liberals—said, "If there's no harm, there's no harm." And that's really what carried the day here. So this news—and then right after that, it came down—the effort to keep the special counsel's report away from public view. Also, Trump lost on that. They can still appeal it. We'll see what happens. And we're going to see—I’ll spoil that one—we're going to see those reports eventually. Kaitlan Collins: OK, well, we might see you back here tomorrow. So thank you for that. Up next, of course, we are continuing to keep a close eye on what is happening on the ground in...

President Trump FINALLY got to speak out and defend himself! It’s about time. Fox News had audio playback of President Trump speaking at his sentencing and I want you to hear it: BREAKING: Statement from President-Elect Donald J. Trump in court after being sentenced pic.twitter.com/WdwAa0pByo — America (@america) January 10, 2025 Here’s a full screen video player with captions added if that’s easier for you: AUDIO PLAYBACK: President Trump speaks out in Court at sentencing! pic.twitter.com/9M3waNKgWN — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) January 10, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Part 1 President Trump: Yes thank you Your Honor.This has been a very terrible experience.I think it’s been a tremendous setback for New Yorkand the New York court system. Uh this is a case that Alvin Bragg did not want to bring.He thought it was, from what I read and from what I hear,that inappropriately handled before he got there.A gentleman from a law firm came in and acted as a district attorney and that gentleman, from what I heard, was a criminal or almost criminal in what he did.It was very inappropriate.It was somebody involved with my political opponent. Part of the records that we’re talking about, they’re saying, I just noticed where he saidI was falsifying business records.Well, the falsification of business records, as they said, it was calling a legal expense in the books where everybody could see them, a legal expense.In other words, that legal fees or a legal expense were put down as legal expense by accountants. They weren’t put down by me.They were put down by accountants.I didn’t call them construction concrete work.I didn’t call them electrical work. I didn’t call them anything.They called a legal fee or a legal expense a legal expense.And for this I got indicted.It’s incredible actually. Now if you look, my attorney alluded to it, the top legal scholars and legal pundits in this country, the ones that are quoted all the time on television, that are making their views felt and highly respected people have said, everyone, virtually everyone that I know,I haven’t seen any to the contrary, not one.And none of these people are not exactly friends of mine,to put it mildly. Part 2 But they all said this is a case that should have never been brought.It’s an injustice of justice.Uh, very respected, Jonathan Turley, Andy McCarthy,Judge David Rifkin, a wonderful man who just passed away by the way, Greg Jarrett, Ellie Honig from CNN, of all places, CNN said that,Paul Ingrassian, Alan Dershowitz.They all said this is not a case that should be brought.It’s not. Think about it, legal expenses are down as legal expenses.And I get indicted for business records.Everybody should be so accurate.It’s been a political witch hunt. It was done to damage my reputation so that I’d lose the election and obviously that didn’t work.And the people of our country got to see this first hand because they watched the case in your courtroom. They got to see this firsthand and then they votedand I won and got the largest number of votes by farof any Republican candidate in historyand won, as you know, all 7 swing states, won conclusively all 7 swing states and won the popularity, the popular vote, by millions and millions of votes.And they’ve been watching your trial.So they understood it. Part 3 I wasn’t allowed to use the lawyer-client privilege or the reliance on counsel. Had a lawyer that made this deal and he admitted that, and he was also a totally discredited person.We weren’t allowed to use the information from the Southern District that totally discredited him.It wasn’t allowed to be put in.And that was terrible, unbelievable.And this is a man who’s got no standing. He’s been disbarred on other matters unrelated, and he was allowed to talk as though he were George Washington, but he’s not George Washington.He shouldn’t have been allowed. The Southern District did a book of approximately 28 pages where they, I’ve never seen anything like it.They excoriated if you wouldn’t let it be put into evidence.So he was able to testify as a witness, and I think it’s a disgrace to the system. I was under a gag order.I’m the first president in history that was under a gag order where I couldn’t talk about aspects of the case that are very important.I guess I’m still under so probably I won’t do it now. I assume I’m still under a gag order.But the fact is that I’m totally innocent.I did nothing wrong, they talked about business records, and the business records were extremely accurately counted. I had nothing to do with them.Any of that was done by an accountant or bookkeeper who, uh, I think gave very credible testimony and was corroborated by everybody that was at Part 4 And with all that’s happening in our country today, with a city that’s burning to the ground,one of our largest, most important cities burning to the ground, with wars that are uncontrollably going on, with all of the problems of inflation and attacks on countries and all of the horrible things that are going on,I got indicted over calling a legal expense a legal expense.It was called a legal expense. I just want to say I think it’s an embarrassment to New York, and New York has a lot of problems, but this is a great embarrassment.I believe that this and other cases that were brought, as you know, the DOJ is very much involved in this case.It’s because that’s the political opponent they’re talking about.The DOJ is very involved.You have a gentleman sitting right there from the DOJ who was from the DOJ’s office.He was also involved with the New York State Attorney General’s case.And he went from there to here.He went around and did what he had to do. He got them to move on me.But in the meantime, I won the election in a massive landslide.And the people of this country understand what’s gone on.This has been a weaponization of government. They call it lawfare. Never happened to any extent like this but never happened in our country before.And I’d just like to exclaim that I was treated very, very unfairly.And I thank you very much. He also sounded off on TruthSocial this morning: FULL TEXT: The Radical Democrats have lost another pathetic, unAmerican Witch Hunt. After spending tens of millions of dollars, wasting over 6 years of obsessive work that should have been spent on protecting New Yorkers from violent, rampant crime that is destroying the City and State, coordinating with the Biden/Harris Department of Injustice in lawless Weaponization, and bringing completely baseless, illegal, and fake charges against your 45th and 47th President, ME, I was given an UNCONDITIONAL DISCHARGE. That result alone proves that, as all Legal Scholars and Experts have said, THERE IS NO CASE, THERE WAS NEVER A CASE, and this whole Scam fully deserves to be DISMISSED. The real Jury, the American People, have spoken, by Re-Electing me with an overwhelming MANDATE in one of the most consequential Elections in History. As the American People have seen, this “case” had no crime, no damages, no proof, no facts, no Law, only a highly conflicted Judge, a star witness who is a disbarred, disgraced, serial perjurer, and criminal Election Interference. Today’s event was a despicable charade, and now that it is over, we will appeal this Hoax, which has no merit, and restore the trust of Americans in our once great System of Justice. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! RELATED REPORT: BREAKING: CNN Legal Expert Explains Why President Trump Actually Gets A Nice Benefit From Today’s Sentencing Please share.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has made yet another blunder as she continues to fail her constituents on the wildfire response, telling desperate residents to visit “URL” for further assistance. “If you need help, emergency [...] The post Los Angeles’ Mayor Tells Desperate Residents to Visit ‘URL’ for Help appeared first on The People's Voice.

Reincarnation, often relegated to the realm of mysticism, may have a surprising scientific foundation. According to a declassified U.S. Army intelligence study, the energy-based mechanics of the universe offer evidence that consciousness transcends death. The [...] The post ‘Consciousness Survives Death’: US Army Intelligence Study Suggests Reincarnation is Real appeared first on The People's Voice.

My Bloody Valentine's infamous live white noise freak-out could have strange effects on those subjected to it

Even through the challenges of dementia, one special phrase kept a grandmother emotionally connected to her husband. This simple, powerful reminder of their love allowed them to share a deep bond despite the passing of time.

Even through the challenges of dementia, one special phrase kept a grandmother emotionally connected to her husband. This simple, powerful reminder of their love allowed them to share a deep bond despite the passing of time.

Even through the challenges of dementia, one special phrase kept a grandmother emotionally connected to her husband. This simple, powerful reminder of their love allowed them to share a deep bond despite the passing of time.