YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #trump #astronomy #florida #humor #inflation #nightsky #biology #moon #plantbiology #terrorism #trafficsafety #animalbiology #gardening #assaultcar #carviolence
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

YubNub News
YubNub News
8 w

Multiple People Reported Shot At New Hampshire Country Club
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Multiple People Reported Shot At New Hampshire Country Club

Heavy police presence has been reported in Nashua, New Hampshire, after a man opened fire in a country club. Nashua’s City Police Department has reported that multiple people have been shot at the Sky…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
8 w

BOOM: Guy Benson Sends JoJo Back to Jerz With a Single Perfect Post
Favicon 
yubnub.news

BOOM: Guy Benson Sends JoJo Back to Jerz With a Single Perfect Post

A common Democrat deflection in the past week to excuse their abhorrent behavior in the days following Charlie Kirk's murder has been to claim something along the lines of 'Where were you when Democrats…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
8 w

Adam Schiff Claims He Loves Free Speech but Two Years Ago He Was Fighting to Kick Journalists Off Twitter
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Adam Schiff Claims He Loves Free Speech but Two Years Ago He Was Fighting to Kick Journalists Off Twitter

On Friday, Democrat Adam Schiff was saying that using government power to go after one's critics was bad and fraught with danger. Of course, 2023’s Adam Schiff was privately singing an entirely different…
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
8 w ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
? PRESIDENTIAL WARNING JUST ISSUED - YOU NEED TO HEAR THIS
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
8 w

Charlie Kirk memorial: Rita Panahi arrives in Arizona to report live
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

Charlie Kirk memorial: Rita Panahi arrives in Arizona to report live

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
8 w

‘Hardcore socialist’ Albanese threatened by top US Republicans over Palestinian statehood move
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

‘Hardcore socialist’ Albanese threatened by top US Republicans over Palestinian statehood move

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
8 w

My Phone Call with Robert Redford
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

My Phone Call with Robert Redford

Culture My Phone Call with Robert Redford The movie star had much to say, especially about Watergate. Long before I ever interviewed Robert Redford, who died in his sleep last Tuesday, I had been told that, among the many qualities that the legendary movie star possessed, punctuality was not one of them. He was known to be forever behind schedule.  Yet, as near as I can recall, Redford—meaning Redford’s people—called me at the appointed time in March of 2017, when I was writing an article for the DGA Quarterly magazine that was about, in part, filmmaker Michael Ritchie, who had directed the star in two of his most consequential pictures, Downhill Racer, in which he played a tenacious skier, and The Candidate, in which he starred as the titular political contender. Both films are terrific and worth revisiting. Having gotten Redford on the phone, I must admit that rumors of his lateness were the furthest thing from my mind. Instead, as he gamely launched into an answer of my first question, I was far more aware of his charisma and charm—reflected in his willingness to talk about whatever I wished to ask him. Don’t ever let journalists tell you they are immune to star power. I was by no means a novice when I did this interview—I had, by then, interviewed such interesting (and eclectic!) luminaries as Peter Bogdanovich, Bob Rafelson, Robert Wise, Carl Reiner, Patty Duke, Barbara Hershey, Sam Waterston, and the longtime companion of Orson Welles, Oja Kodar—but, still, this was Robert Redford: The Sundance Kid, Jay Gatsby, conman extraordinaire in The Sting. Of course, Redford could have been all of those things and still been dismissive, unhelpful, or in a hurry, but such was not the case.  What makes interviewers susceptible to the magnetism of stars is the flattering notion that their questions are being listened to and honored by an important person. In other words, the star is playing along—behaving as though the interviewer’s inquiries are worth his time. So, when I asked Redford what appealed to him about the improvised-seeming, “accidental” quality of Downhill Racer, it was quite gratifying when he answered—and at length:  Well, because I had been very affected by watching documentaries. I started by watching Emile de Antonio’s work, and then Pennebaker and Leacock. And what I liked about it was you were there. In other words, it had a feeling that you were eavesdropping on something happening, rather than having it formally structured. I just was drawn to that because of the reality and also the humanness of it. It was quite ego-boosting, too, when I would make an assertion about this or that film, and Redford would say “Oh yeah, absolutely” or “Well, I’m glad to hear that.” And glad he was: As I was to learn over the 40 minutes of our conversation, Redford seemed to enjoy talking about his movies, even those I had not asked about. Was this why he was always late? For example, asking about the genesis of Downhill Racer, Redford treated me to a discourse on the inner workings of the studio that produced it, Paramount Pictures. The head of Paramount’s parent company Gulf+Western, Charlie Bluhdorn, was lukewarm about the project but willing to play along. “He liked me because of the film Barefoot in the Park,” Redford said. On the other hand, top executive Robert Evans was not a fan. Redford had wanted Roman Polanski, then known for such macabre confections as Knife in the Water and Repulsion, to direct. “But Evans, I think, wanted him for something bigger,” Redford said. “They saw this as a small, small, more or less an independent film that wouldn’t have much traction in the marketplace, so they kind of steered him towards Rosemary’s Baby.”  By the end of the interview, perhaps inevitably, Redford had steered the conversation all the way to his classic film version of All the President’s Men, in which he and Dustin Hoffman starred as Washington Post Watergate reporting impresarios Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.  In Redford’s telling, it all goes back to the release of The Candidate in the summer of 1972. In a marketing gimmick, he said, he had consented to board a train running from Jacksonville to Miami in a kind whistle-stop-style promotional tour. “They’d promote my being there, so we’d have maybe two, three thousand people there, and then I had these statistics in my hand about what Muskie and Scoop Jackson and McGovern drew doing the same thing,” said Redford, noting with bemusement—and certainly nothing like pride—that his crowds appeared larger than those for real presidential contenders. As he recounted to me, he told the crowd: “It looks to me like there’s several thousand people here today. I just want to thank you all for coming, and I want to remind you I have absolutely nothing to say!”  Tagging along the promotional tour were members of the press, disinterested in Redford’s stunt, he told me, but buzzing about the then-recent break-in at the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate. “I said, ‘Hey, by the way, what happened with that?’” Redford recalled. “They looked at each other and kind of smiled, and they said, ‘Well, I’ll tell you, what happened is never going to come out.’ . . . They were suggesting that Nixon had something to do with it.” Redford was incensed, but the ink-stained wretches gave him a lesson in reality. As Redford remembered: “That’s when they read me the riot act. They said, ‘Boy, do you not know how it works. First of all, it’s summer. All anyone cares about is whether Hank Aaron is going to break Babe Ruth’s record. Secondly, it’s summer, no one’s paying attention. And thirdly, this guy has a switchblade mentality, Nixon. He’s going to win on a landslide, McGovern is going to self-destruct, and nobody wants to be on the wrong side of this guy.’” Redford went home in a state of depression, he said, but shortly thereafter, he recalled, he spotted an article about Watergate with a dual byline: Woodward and Bernstein. “I didn’t pay much attention to the names, I just knew it was always two guys, but it kept growing, it kept growing, and building and building,” said Redford, who, after reading a profile of the two newshounds, saw movie potential in their getting of the story.  As he explained to me, Redford was initially unable to rouse interest in his burgeoning cinematic plans from either the newspaper or from Woodward. “No one was interested in me because they thought I was from Hollywood,” he said. Eventually, as the scandal grew in scope, Redford succeeded in getting some face time with Woodward. “He and Bernstein came to my apartment, and we spent eight hours just talking through what was going on,” Redford said. “This is before the hearings, this is before Nixon’s resignation. I got into this thing really early, but it all started with The Candidate.”  He would have gone on, but at that very moment, his assistant chimed in to say that “Bob” was late for another interview. Of course. I thanked him, and he said, cheerfully, “You’re sure welcome. Bye-bye.”  Robert Redford handled our fleeting telephonic encounter with such class that I, of course, resisted telling him that I thought Nixon was a pretty good president and excellent diplomat who got a raw deal, and that I was not entirely persuaded of the greatness (or, at least, the nobility) of the movie All the President’s Men. But who cares? Goodbye, Bob. The post My Phone Call with Robert Redford appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
8 w

Israel’s Qatar Strike Threatens NATO’s Credibility
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Israel’s Qatar Strike Threatens NATO’s Credibility

Foreign Affairs Israel’s Qatar Strike Threatens NATO’s Credibility The foundations of the Western alliance are under threat. Israel’s airstrike on Doha earlier this month didn’t just blow up Israel–Hamas negotiations—it shifted the fault lines of regional security. The strike killed five Hamas members, including the son of a senior leader, in Doha’s Leqtaifiya district. Qatar, a major non-NATO U.S. ally that hosts the Al Udeid Air Base—America’s largest military installation in the region—condemned the attack as “cowardly and treacherous.” Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the strike as a blow against Hamas. Israel’s strike on Qatar, framed as a counterterrorism operation, raises an alarming possibility: that Turkey, a NATO member, could be next. Like Qatar, Ankara hosts members of Hamas and offers them political cover in ways Israel sees as detrimental to its security interests. Turkey also houses U.S. nuclear weapons at Incirlik Air Base and remains a cornerstone of the transatlantic alliance. If Israel was willing to bomb Doha under the pretext of fighting Hamas, it could deploy the same rationale for an attack on Turkish soil. And if Turkey, in response to such an attack, solicited American and European support under Article 5—NATO’s collective defense provision—and if such support was not forthcoming, the foundations of the alliance would be severely undermined. To fully comprehend the risks at play, one must look at the broader trajectory of Israeli–Turkish relations. Ties have steadily deteriorated since at least the start of Israel’s assault on Gaza in October 2023. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has even accused Israel of committing a “genocide” in Gaza. The deterioration of bilateral ties accelerated after Israel’s surprise attack on Iran this June. Meanwhile, both countries have expanded their military presence in Syria since the ouster last December of President Bashar al-Assad. Israel has carried out repeated strikes on Syrian airbases in Hama and Homs to block Turkish deployment of air defenses and drones that could challenge its aerial dominance. Turkish officials have accused Israel of “expansionist aims” and of undermining Syria’s fragile interim government. Reports of close encounters between Israeli and Turkish aircraft in Syrian airspace prompted “technical talks” to avoid accidental clashes. The tension between Turkey and Israel is now being exacerbated by the presence of Hamas in Ankara. Turkey, like Qatar, does not designate Hamas as a terrorist organization, and its willingness to host the group has long frustrated the Israeli government. Israel’s strike in Doha demonstrates its willingness to strike the sovereign territory of U.S. allies to decapitate Hamas. That precedent makes a future strike on Turkey no longer unthinkable. Some Mideast outlets have even reported that Israel considered striking Hamas in Turkey before opting for Qatar. The Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar said that Israel scrapped the initial plan for fear of sparking a diplomatic crisis by striking a NATO member. Any Israeli aggression against Turkey, whether through missiles and bombs or a covert operation by Mossad, would undoubtedly test NATO’s integrity. Article 5 stipulates that an armed attack against one or more members should be considered an attack against all, but would the alliance truly come to Turkey’s aid against Israel? Given the pro-Israel orientation of the Trump administration and of Washington broadly, the U.S. would not intervene militarily at Tukey’s behest against Israel. Furthermore, with European governments already stretched by Ukraine and broadly sympathetic to Israel, they too would likely offer Turkey little to no meaningful support.  If Turkey’s appeal to Article 5 were unsuccessful, the consequences could be severe. Erdoğan has long hinted at the possibility of exiting NATO; the kind of crisis imagined above could turn threats into reality. Moreover, the alliance’s deterrent power would collapse, possibly prompting other members to wonder whether devoting substantial military and financial resources to NATO is still worthwhile.  An Israeli attack on Turkey would also cast doubts upon America’s umbrella across the Middle East, doubts already shared by many following Israel’s strike on Qatar. If Washington could not stop Israel from bombing a country that hosts its largest regional base, what protection can Jordan, Egypt, or the Gulf states expect? For many U.S. partners, the strike and the Trump administration’s unwillingness to punish Israel for it raises the question of what American security guarantees mean in practice. Washington’s credibility has already eroded through its unwavering support for Israel. Since October 2023, the United States has vetoed multiple UN resolutions calling for a ceasefire in Gaza while supplying Israel with weaponry and financial aid subsidized by American taxpayers. In the West Bank, U.S. backing has enabled settlement expansion and military raids that have displaced tens of thousands of Palestinians. In Lebanon, Israeli forces remain despite agreements for them to withdraw, and Israel has violated a ceasefire by conducting strikes that have killed dozens of civilians. By shielding Israel from accountability, Washington has tied its own reputation to Israel’s wars, whether in Gaza, the West Bank, or southern Lebanon. The Trump administration’s tolerance for Netanyahu’s Doha strike may appear to be just one more example of the close U.S.–Israel partnership, but the implications are profound. Israel has now demonstrated a willingness to strike the heart of U.S. allies. If Turkey becomes its next target, NATO could face a crisis unlike any in its history. For Americans, this is not about whether one sides with Turkey, Qatar, or Israel. It is about whether America should sacrifice its alliances and credibility to enable a client state’s reckless military decisions. By backing Israel’s new course, Washington risks undermining not only Turkey’s security but also the very alliance system that has defined Western security for generations. The main threat to NATO may come not from Moscow or Beijing, nor from declining support for the alliance in Washington, but from a small country in the Middle East that increasingly acts against the interests of its superpower patron. The post Israel’s Qatar Strike Threatens NATO’s Credibility appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
8 w

How Israel Captured TikTok
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

How Israel Captured TikTok

Foreign Affairs How Israel Captured TikTok The push to ban the app gained steam after pro-Palestinian content went viral. Reports that TikTok will transfer an 80 percent stake in its U.S. operations to Oracle, Silver Lake, and Andreessen Horowitz are celebrated in Washington as a strategic victory over China, where its parent company is based. But a closer examination of the deal reveals a different winner: the foreign government of Israel and its lobby in the United States. Though the first campaign to ban TikTok originated in concerns of Chinese manipulation and data theft, that effort ultimately fizzled out after TikTok agreed to hand over all user data to a U.S.-based contractor through their program Project Texas. But TikTok wasn’t out of the danger zone just yet. As Mike Gallagher—a former U.S. congressman, current “head of defense” at big data company Palantir, and author of the revived and successful effort to ban TikTok—wrote in November 2023, the reason the U.S. needed to ban the most popular app among Gen Z was not because the algorithm caused young Americans to support China but because it caused them “to support Hamas.” That same month, panic over TikTok’s “pro-terror” algorithm reached a crescendo after young people on the app discovered Osama bin Laden’s “Letter to America” through their “For You” page. For the first time, many Gen Zers read the Al Qaeda leader’s own explanation for why the U.S. was attacked on 9/11—an explanation that had nothing to do with hating “our freedoms,” as official Washington had long insisted, and everything to do with U.S. militarism abroad, particularly on behalf of Israel. Because too many young people learned why they really hate us, the bin Laden letter was swiftly banned from TikTok and censored from the Guardian’s own website, where it had been hosted for over 20 years.  TikTok’s capacity to totally and instantaneously shatter decades of neoconservative propaganda revealed what Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, would label Israel’s “TikTok problem”: that the app exposes a generation of Americans to too much information unapproved by the CIA and Mossad.  Israel’s representatives in the U.S. Congress moved quickly, voting to ban the app in April 2024. “There was such overwhelming support for us to shut down” the app, explained then-Senator Mitt Romney of Utah, because “if you look at the postings on TikTok and the number of mentions of Palestinians, relative to other social media sites—it’s overwhelmingly so among TikTok broadcasts.”  That ban is now unlikely to go into effect, not because of concerns about free speech or government overreach, but because Israel’s TikTok problem has been solved. In July, TikTok hired IDF instructor and self-declared “passionate Zionist” Erica Mindel to serve as the company’s hate speech manager. And as independent journalists Lee Fang and Jack Poulson reported last year, TikTok has forged a content moderation partnership with CyberWell—an NGO closely linked to the Israeli government and staffed by Israeli spies—whose chief executive publicly boasts about the foreign lobby’s successful campaigns to suppress the free speech of Americans and restrict the information they can receive not just on TikTok but across “all major social media platforms.” The acquisition of TikTok by Oracle, Silver Lake, and Andreessen Horowitz is therefore not simply a reshuffling of corporate control, but the latest step to consolidate a foreign government’s censorship regime in America. The app’s new owners openly display their affection for, and often loyalty toward, Israel.  Oracle’s billionaire founder Larry Ellison—who believes that “there is no greater honor than supporting” the foreign military of Israel—is one of the most unapologetic Zionist oligarchs in America. The Ellison family has poured millions into Israel’s tech and surveillance industries, even working with the Israeli government and its spies to monitor and disrupt Americans who use their free speech to boycott that foreign government. More recently, Larry Ellison and the heir to the Oracle fortune, his son David, have gobbled up the largest media conglomerates in America as part of their mission to shape the information system in Israel’s favor. Oracle’s acquisition of TikTok is part of that broader effort. Cofounded by the son of a famous Israel First neoconservative, TikTok’s other new owner, Andreesen Horowitz, is equally aligned with the Israeli government; the firm has rapidly become one of the most active foreign investors in Israel. Impressed by Israel’s genocide in Gaza, its various wars of aggression, and its pager attacks against civilians in Lebanon, Andreesen Horowitz launched a recruiting drive to attract the “Elite IDF talent” behind each of those war crimes. Like Israel’s repression of the Palestinians and territorial expansion, its attempt to censor the free speech of Americans and control the information system goes back many decades; indeed, they go hand in hand.  Israeli officials have long understood the growing unpopularity in the West for their campaign to create a Greater Israel, yet they rely entirely on the support of Western democracies to shield and finance its construction. No longer able to secure that backing through democratic consent, Israel and its network of loyalists have sought to guarantee it through systems of anti-democratic control. The ongoing political rebellion of young Americans against our Middle Eastern protectorate, highlighted in recent polling, has shown Israeli officials and their allies that without manipulating American perceptions through hasbara and censorship, Israel will be politically isolated, weak, and unable to survive. TikTok’s capture by some of Israel’s most powerful supporters helps ensure that the Israel-skeptical sentiments of Gen Z—the most politically disruptive generation in decades—will be contained. The post How Israel Captured TikTok appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
8 w News & Oppinion

rumbleBitchute
?? If Tradies worked in an Office Job ??
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 7079 out of 98592
  • 7075
  • 7076
  • 7077
  • 7078
  • 7079
  • 7080
  • 7081
  • 7082
  • 7083
  • 7084
  • 7085
  • 7086
  • 7087
  • 7088
  • 7089
  • 7090
  • 7091
  • 7092
  • 7093
  • 7094
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund