During a conversation on CNN on Thursday night, former MSNBC host Touré appeared to make the incredible suggestion that President Donald Trump had not really been shot in the ear during an assassination attempt on July 13, 2024, at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. The attempted assassin, Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, was killed by law enforcement at the rally; fire captain Corey Comperatore was fatally shot when he dived on members of his family to protect them. The discussion on CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip featured Touré, Scott Jennings, Adrienne Elrod, Ben Ferguson, and Elie Honig. It centered on the White House report that President Trump had swelling in his legs, a benign condition. “Throughout the time that we have seen him on the public stages, this is not the most intelligent person we have,” Touré insisted. “This is not the best analysis of information. He does not have a lot of information at his fingertips as far as things that he knows. So, if there is a cognitive problem…” “They have not always been forthcoming about his health,” Elrod declared. “He supposedly got shot in the ear,” Touré stated. “Woah, woah, woah. Did you say ‘supposedly’?” Jennings said, shocked. “Supposedly, that’s where we are now?” Ferguson chimed in. “All I know is l went to the Republican National Convention and he had a bandage on his ear. He had blood on his face,” Jennings said, later turning to Touré and asking, “Did he — did he get shot or not? You’re saying you think he didn’t get shot?” “Scott, I know that you want to revisit this issue,” Phillips interjected. “I think it’s an important question. Are there still people that are truthers on this?” Jennings persisted. “Touré, did he get shot? “ Phillips queried. “I wasn’t there,” Touré backtracked. “I don’t know. I don’t know. I would like to hear from his doctor. “ UNHINGED: Touré on CNN last night: President Trump "supposedly got shot in the ear."@ScottJenningsKY: "Woah, woah, woah. Did you say 'supposedly'?"@benfergusonshow: "Supposedly, that's where we are now." Abby Phillip: "Touré, he was shot in the ear." This is where the… pic.twitter.com/0aSOeVPtg4 — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) July 18, 2025

California Governor Gavin Newsom recently struggled to say whether an eight-year-old was too young to undergo transgender procedures. Newsom’s comments came during a conversation with podcaster Shawn Ryan, the governor’s latest appearance seemingly designed to make him seem more moderate in advance of a likely presidential bid in 2028. But Newsom, who once said that California was a beacon of parental rights, may want to take a closer look at what his fellow Democrats are doing in the California Assembly. Earlier this month, lawmakers advanced Assembly Bill 1084, which permits a court-appointed lawyer to assist children in changing the name and sex designation on their birth certificates and obtaining a new birth certificate that can designate them as “non-binary.” If the bill passes, court-appointed lawyers or guardians will be empowered to force these changes even if parents have retained custody of the child in question. The bill essentially places children in positions of power. All that a child needs to do is make a claim of abuse, whether substantiated or not, against his parents, and he will be assigned an attorney who has been trained to accept a child’s gender identity pronouncement at face value. Authored by Assemblyman Rick Zbur — who compared people fighting to protect women’s sports to Nazis — the bill is the latest brazen assault on parental rights, another attempt by leftists to replace parents with government agents. The bill stipulates that, as long as a court rules it “is likely” that the child will remain a ward of the state until they turn 18, court-appointed lawyers have the authority to change the child’s sex and name, as well as their birth certificate. This grants parental rights to third parties, essentially stripping parents of legal control of their child. In other words, the bill allows a stranger to enable someone else’s child’s desire to “socially transition,” a mental health treatment that is not a neutral act. Children affirmed in their transgender identity are more likely to continue rejecting their sexed bodies if they are confirmed in their delusion. Parents can contest the petition, but the bill states that a challenge “based solely on concerns  that the proposed change is not the petitioner’s actual gender identity or gender assigned at birth shall not constitute good cause.” Simply, a parent who believes in biological reality and does not believe that the child he raised is the sex that he was at birth cannot contest the name and sex change on his birth certificate. This bill is unconstitutional, a direct violation of the fundamental right of parents to raise their children in accordance with their beliefs, a right recently affirmed by the Supreme Court in its opinion in Mahmoud v. Taylor. A hundred years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in Pierce v. The Society of Sisters that “The child is not the mere creature of the State.” The bill is also a violation of the First Amendment, dismissing any parent’s viewpoint that sex is binary and immutable. Zbur designated the legislation an “urgency bill,” meaning that it will take effect immediately if the governor signs it. Should Newsom sign the bill, it will render official records like birth certificates completely unreliable, as anyone in the state of California can petition with little to no opposition that their sex is whatever they claim it to be. This is one of many bills that the California Democrats are advancing that are designed to “Trump-proof” California. The Democrat-controlled legislature is likely to pass the bill, which means it will likely land on Newsom’s desk soon. When it does, we’ll see if Newsom is really the pro-parent moderate he claims to be, or if California parents only have rights as long as they believe that their children can change sex. Erin Friday leads Our Duty, an organization that advocates for parents with gender-confused children. The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

This week, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled “How Leftist Nonprofit Networks Exploit Federal Tax Dollars to Advance a Radical Agenda,” a look into how USAID, which was partially defunded by Congress this week, has been abused for radical causes abroad. Nearly 20 years ago, one such scandal inspired an online database to try to weed out the worst offenders. American contractors funded by the State Department and local police staged a daring raid on a brothel in India, rescuing a number of young girls from sexual slavery. But within days, a prostitute union funded by USAID pressured the girls to stop cooperating with investigators and return to the brothel, where they were once again subjected to rape for profit. The ensuing scandal so outraged Congress that USAID was forced to cancel the prostitute union’s funding — but unfortunately, nothing was done to curb USAID’s grotesque culture of corruption, globalist meddling, and left-wing activism. Finally, two decades later, President Donald Trump has taken decisive action to cut off USAID’s funding. But with liberal federal judges interceding on behalf of the Washington swamp, the battle is far from over. The only permanent solution is for Congress to shut down this rogue agency for good. USAID was created in 1961 as part of President John F. Kennedy’s effort to win developing countries to America’s cause in the Cold War against the Soviet menace. Despite such lofty intentions, USAID was quickly captured by left-wing ideologues. The agency has spent decades funneling billions of dollars into dubious projects that advance a radical agenda under the guise of “development” aid. Recent examples of USAID’s depravity include financing a “transgender opera” in Colombia, producing a “DEI musical” in Ireland, and providing $15 million for condoms to the Taliban. These are not anomalies — they are the logical outcome of an irredeemable agency that has long prioritized social engineering over economic development and national security. Perhaps the most egregious example remains the sex trafficking scandal in India uncovered in 2005. Despite clear evidence that USAID-funded organizations were facilitating child prostitution, agency officials not only denied involvement but actively obstructed congressional investigators. It was only through relentless congressional oversight that investigators exposed the truth. And yet, even after the revelations, USAID faced no meaningful consequence — no bureaucrats were prosecuted or fired, no structural reforms were enacted, and the agency continued to operate as usual right up to the present day. The Trump administration has correctly recognized that USAID is beyond reform. By cutting funding, the White House has struck a major blow against this globalist slush fund. But unless Congress acts, USAID will remain an open wound festering in the federal budget, waiting to be revived by activist judges or the next Democratic administration. USAID has proven, time and again, that it is unaccountable, wasteful, hostile to American ideals, and antithetical to American interests. It is a weapon of ideological warfare masquerading as a humanitarian agency, using taxpayer money to fund left-wing activism abroad while ignoring real global crises that threaten national security. The solution is simple: Congress must dismantle and permanently abolish USAID. Foreign aid should be administered through highly targeted programs closely monitored by the State Department, ensuring that assistance truly aligns with strategic interests rather than ideological whims. President Trump has led the way by shining a light on USAID’s corruption and attempting to turn off the spigot of taxpayer dollars. Now, it’s time for Congress to finish the job and eliminate this agency once and for all. J. Marc Wheat is the general counsel of Advancing American Freedom. The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

As the internet continues to obsess over the alleged affair between the CEO of tech company Astronomer and its head of human resources, the woman who initially shared a video of the two appearing to show a public display of affection at a recent Coldplay concert is defending her actions. “I had no idea who the couple was. Just thought I caught an interesting reaction to the kiss cam and decided to post it,” New Jersey resident Grace Springer told The Sun of her video clip, which amassed tens of millions of views and became the talk of social media after being posted in the early morning hours on Thursday.  “A part of me feels bad for turning these people’s lives upside down, but, play stupid games… win stupid prizes,” she added. “I hope their partners can heal from this and get a second chance at the happiness they deserve with their future still in front of them.” “I hope, for them, my video was a blessing in disguise,” Springer added. @instaagraace trouble in paradise?? ? #coldplay #boston #coldplayconcert #kisscam #fyp ♬ original sound – grace The viral video shows married Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and the company’s Chief People Officer Kristin Cabot embracing one another, as was shown on the big screen at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, when the kiss cam landed on them. The couple reacted immediately, with Byron letting go of Cabot and stepping out of frame. Cabot had a similar reaction as she immediately hid her face and turned away from the camera. Coldplay frontman Chris Martin called out their reaction. “Oh look at these two,” the singer can be heard saying. “Either they’re having an affair or they’re very shy.” As of Friday, the original TikTok video has more than 55 million views. The popularity of the video spurred many fake reactions, including a faux statement attributed to Byron and images of a fake social media post attributed to Coldplay saying, “Starting with our next show, we’re introducing camera-free audience sections for people and their sidepieces.”  Byron has served as CEO of Astronomer since 2023, and Cabot was hired nine months ago.  Byron’s wife, Megan Kerrigan Byron, removed her last name from her Facebook account before deactivating it entirely. Byron was on LinkedIn but appears to have removed his profile as of Friday. They reportedly have two children together.  Neither the exec nor the company has issued a public statement. Ry Walker, Astronomer’s former CEO, did address the situation with an X post.  “For those asking—I’m no longer involved in @astronomerio—yes I was co-founder and early CEO—not on the team or board since 2022, and have no information on ColdplayGate.”

The radical left’s latest move raises a storm as ‘Liberty Vans’ prepared to prowl the streets to stalk ICE agents, setting the stage for potential chaos. ICE Raids and Activist Oppositions: A Brewing Storm U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has seen a surge in operations thanks to an unprecedented injection of federal funds. This comes from a budget reconciliation bill passed in 2025, which allocated $170 billion for immigration-related provisions. A staggering $29.9 billion is earmarked for ICE enforcement and deportation operations, allowing for larger and more frequent raids. This increased activity has been particularly noticeable in urban centers like Los Angeles, causing fear and disruption among immigrant communities.   In response, activist groups such as the Save America Movement (SAM) have mobilized, raising nearly $1 million to deploy ‘Liberty Vans.’ These mobile teams are equipped with cameras, chaplains, lawyers, and veterans, aiming to monitor and confront ICE operations in real-time. The potential for conflict is high, with activists prepared to document and disrupt ICE actions, raising questions about safety and legality on both sides. The Political and Social Backdrop The Los Angeles area, with its significant immigrant population and history of sanctuary policies, has become a focal point for both ICE enforcement and activist resistance. Federal authorities and conservative media frame ICE actions as necessary for public safety, while progressive groups and local governments emphasize the social and economic harms of aggressive enforcement. The political climate is polarized, and the stakes are high as both sides prepare for confrontations that could escalate. CIVIL RIGHTS LAWYER ON THE ICE RAIDS: “There is so much money at stake — 90% go to jails owned by private prisons that make billions of dollars a year.” pic.twitter.com/t9khfe9xbh — The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) July 2, 2025 Activist leaders have condemned ICE tactics, citing a lack of transparency and accountability, while conservative commentators, including Glenn Beck, criticize activist groups for hypocrisy and extremism. Beck warns of potential chaos, describing the situation as a ‘bloodbath on the streets’ waiting to happen if these confrontations continue unchecked. Community Impact and Government Response L.A. County has announced the creation of a cash fund for families impacted by ICE raids to provide emergency financial relief. This decision reflects the local government’s attempt to mitigate the humanitarian impact of federal enforcement actions. Meanwhile, reports of ICE agents operating in masks and without visible identification have fueled tensions, with activists and civil rights groups decrying these practices as violations of due process and civil liberties. The community disruption is palpable, with families facing sudden detention and deportation, businesses disrupted, and fear spreading among immigrant populations. As SAM and other groups continue to scale up their operations, the potential for legal and physical confrontation increases, posing risks to all involved. Long-Term Implications and the Road Ahead In the long term, the situation could lead to legal and policy challenges to ICE practices, with debates over due process and civil liberties taking center stage. The political polarization around immigration is likely to deepen, influencing upcoming elections and party dynamics. As both sides dig in, the broader social and economic consequences for immigrant communities and local economies could be profound. ICE just got a $100 billion blank check.Meanwhile, your kid’s school can’t afford air conditioning. The “One Big Beautiful Bill” handed ICE: $45B for mass detention $30B+ for raids, transport, and deportations $8B+ for bonuses and new agents And $170B total when you… pic.twitter.com/PX2GSAnZhp — House Of Carter (@House0fCarter) July 15, 2025 Experts warn that mass detention and deportation are costly and disruptive, often failing to address the root causes of migration. Legal experts caution against expanded enforcement without adequate oversight, highlighting the risk of systemic rights violations. With tensions high and the stakes even higher, the coming months could be pivotal in shaping the future of immigration policy and enforcement in the United States. Sources: American Immigration Council Politifact Economic Policy Institute LA Times

'Our side has largely relied on traditional media'

'a doormat for Republicans'

'Ignoring the biological reality'

'It's not hurting him with his base'

At a time of record-high debt and growing public distrust in the media, one thing is clear: American taxpayers should not be forced to bankroll partisan content. That’s why the House just passed – again – a bold rescissions package that takes a stand for fiscal responsibility and fairness. This legislation, championed by President Trump and House […]