An examination of her new movie "Treasure." The post Lena Dunam’s Auschwitz Tour Does More Harm Than Good appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

New Freedom Center ebook exposes the President’s traitorous relationship with the CCP. The post Beijing Biden: Exposing Biden’s China Business appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

The Jewish State will soon have to make a decision. The post Will Israel Be Able to Avoid War with Hezbollah? appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

The Internal Revenue Service is examining improper claims businesses have made for the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) a refundable tax credit for certain eligible businesses and tax-exempt organizations were affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. The ERC expired in 2021. Claims filed after mid-September 2023 have been blocked from being processed by a moratorium. “In coming weeks, the IRS plans to deny tens of thousands of claims that had shown the greatest risk of being improper, the agency said,” The Wall Street Journal reported, adding, “Pop-up firms and marketers created a mini-industry that encouraged a flood of claims long after the pandemic’s emergency-phase ended—many of which the IRS has said are questionable.” The Journal noted that the government has doled out roughly $230 billion for the program. “The IRS remains deeply concerned about how many taxpayers have been misled and deluded by promoters into thinking they’re eligible for a big payday,” IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel stated. “People may think they are on safe ground, but many are simply not eligible under the law.” The GOP-led House of Representatives, attempting to save an estimated $80 billion, voted in January to end the ERC for claims filed after Jan. 31, 2024, but the Democrat-led Senate has blocked the move. By mid-May, unprocessed ERC claims had reached 1.4 million by mid-May; 880,000 were filed before the moratorium, according to the government. Last month Stenson Tamaddon, a Phoenix-based tax advisory firm and provider of ERC services, sued the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the United States of America, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel, and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. “Stenson Tamaddon alleges that the IRS violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by enacting legislative rules without following proper procedures, specifically concerning ‘Notice 2021-20,’” the company stated. “This notice significantly restricted the availability of Employee Retention Credit (ERC) payouts by narrowing the eligibility criteria.” “We believe that the IRS has overstepped its authority and failed to follow proper procedures, resulting in unfair restrictions on businesses entitled to the Employee Retention Credit,” CEO Eric Stenson said. “Our goal is to ensure that these businesses receive the support they deserve, this litigation is a last resort.” He added. “Our position remains that there is no broad authority in the Internal Revenue Code or any corresponding tax regulation that allows the IRS to stop processing an entire class of tax returns. I wish they would have given us more information about these risk markers they were using. The IRS needs to be more transparent and should provide clear, detailed criteria as to what constitutes a high-risk claim.”

I hate dolls. Very much so. Their uncanny little blank glass eyes staring at me from across the room at night made me turn around any and all dolls I owned to face the wall. But I’m not just going to allow myself to suffer with this fear. No! I’m going to make sure you […] The post Top Ten Creepiest Dolls in History appeared first on Listverse.

Not all uprisings, revolts, and revolutions are led by men. You may think that’d be the case judging from the most notable moments of revolt in history. Still, women have had a surprisingly important role in many underdog uprisings. All throughout human history—especially in the last couple of centuries—when women have gotten fed up about […] The post Ten Uprisings Led by Women appeared first on Listverse.

Newsmax announced this month that it’s planning for an initial public offering later this year or in 2025—a big leap for a media outlet that began more than 25 years ago as a website delivering news on the internet. Christopher Ruddy, Newsmax’s founder and CEO, spoke with The Daily Signal about his plans for the company and explained how eligible investors are able to take advantage of a private placement offering before the company goes public on the stock market. “Thousands of people would tell us they wanted to buy shares in Newsmax through the years,” Ruddy said. “And we thought, wouldn’t it be great to have tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, of co-owners [and] partners with Newsmax that are fighting for us [and] have a stake in our success? And so that was the biggest reason.” Now more than ever, especially in this election year of 2024, America needs Newsmax, and you can join with us as an investor,” Ruddy said. After working as a journalist at the New York Post and Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Ruddy started Newsmax in 1998. In the years that followed, he transformed Newsmax into a broadcasting and multimedia powerhouse reaching more than 40 million people. Newsmax’s TV channel is the fourth-highest-rated on cable news. And it’s just one of several media properties in addition to its website, Newsmax.com: There’s also a free streaming channel at Newsmax2, a smartphone app, a streaming service called Newsmax+, and Newsmax Magazine. Now, as he prepares for Newsmax’s initial public offering and eventual listing on Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange, Ruddy is seeking to raise $225 million as part of a private offering for accredited investors. More details are available at NewsmaxInvest.com. Listen to an interview with Ruddy on “The Daily Signal Podcast” to hear his vision for Newsmax, the threats and challenges facing conservative media, and why he’s optimistic about the future. Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy (Photo: Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images) The post Christopher Ruddy Shares Vision for Newsmax’s Future Ahead of IPO appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Earlier this week, the Senate Armed Services Committee voted to require young women to register with Selective Service for the draft should one be officially reinstated.  Slipped into the Senate’s version of the fiscal 2025 National Defense Authorization Act is an amendment to the Military Selective Service Act that would require women between the ages of 18 and 26 to register for the draft.   That should come as no surprise, however. Military recruitment under the Biden administration continues to focus more on woke ideology than the call to serve, preferring vaccination status over tactical capabilities and diversity, equity, and inclusion requirements over physical conditioning.  It’s no wonder the U.S. military missed its 2023 recruitment goals by more than 41,000 people.   Still, the question remains: Should women be required to register with Selective Service?  As it stands, there are two version of the bill. Last week, the House passed a version that does not include the controversial “Draft Our Daughters” amendment, while the Senate committee’s does. Ultimately, both chambers will need to come to an agreement on whether or not the amendment, which has failed in the past, is to be included. That raises the question: Is this really what’s in America’s best interest when it comes to national security?  The U.S. inducted the last man into the military using the Selective Service System in 1973—shortly after President Joe Biden first came onto the political scene as a senator.  Thousands of women already serve in the U.S. armed forces. That should be celebrated and focused on to create more opportunities for them in the military, but should mandatory Selective Service registration be a part of that? We discuss that on this week’s edition of the “Problematic Women” podcast. We also explore how K-12 school indoctrination is sabotaging the U.S. economy. Plus: Biden’s Department of Education has undermined women’s rights with its latest move against Title IX, just in time for Women’s Sports Week. And as always, we’ll crown our “Problematic Woman of the Week.” The post Congress Wants You: ‘Draft Our Daughters’ Returns appeared first on The Daily Signal.

During the Constitution ratification debates between the Federalists (who supported ratification) and the Anti-Federalists (who opposed it), one of the most strident areas of disagreement was the extent…

Email Signup Just in Case https://www.sustainableseasons.com/ Follow me on Twitter X Just in Case https://twitter.com/PatrickHumphre Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEb2N54-fMYvtCs2i7P40gg/join