A former Biden administration official working on cyber policy says the United States military would have a problem controlling its soldiers' use of artificial intelligence.Mieke Eoyang, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for cyber policy during the Joe Biden administration, said that current AI models are poorly suited for use in the U.S. military and would be dangerous if implemented.'There are any number of things that you might be worried about.'With claims of "AI psychosis" and killer robots, Eoyang said the military cannot simply use an existing, public AI agent and morph it into use for the military. This would of course involve giving a chatbot leeway on suggesting the use of violence, or even killing a target.Allowing for such capabilities is cause for alarm in the Department of Defense, now Department of War, Eoyang claimed."A lot of the conversations around AI guardrails have been, how do we ensure that the Pentagon's use of AI does not result in overkill? There are concerns about 'swarms of AI killer robots,' and those worries are about the ways the military protects us," she told Politico. "But there are also concerns about the Pentagon's use of AI that are about the protection of the Pentagon itself. Because in an organization as large as the military, there are going to be some people who engage in prohibited behavior. When an individual inside the system engages in that prohibited behavior, the consequences can be quite severe, and I'm not even talking about things that involve weapons, but things that might involve leaks."Perhaps unbeknownst to Eoyang, the Department of War is already working on the development of an internal AI system.RELATED: War Department contractor warns China is way ahead, and 'we don't know how they're doing it' GREG BAKER/AFP via Getty Images According to EdgeRunner CEO Tyler Saltsman, not only is the Department of War not afraid of AI, but it's "all about it."Saltsman just wrapped up a test run with the Department of War during military exercises in Fort Carson, Colorado, and Fort Riley, Kansas. He recently told Blaze News about his offline chatbot, EdgeRunner AI, which is modernizing the delivery of information to on-the-ground troops."The Department of War is trying to fortify what their AI strategy looks like; they're not afraid of it," Saltsman told Blaze News in response to Eoyang's claims. He added, "It's concerning that folks who are clueless on technology were put in such highly influential positions."In her interview, Eoyang — a former MSNBC contributor — also raised concerns about operational security and that "malicious actors" could get "their hands on" AI tools used by the U.S. military."There are any number of things that you might be worried about. There's information loss; there's compromise that could lead to other, more serious consequences," she said.RELATED: 'They want to spy on you': Military tech CEO explains why AI companies don't want you going offline Photo by VCG/VCG via Getty Images These valid concerns were seemingly put to bed by Saltsman when he previously revealed to Blaze News that EdgeRunner AI would remain completely offline. The entrepreneur even advocated for publicly available AI models to offer an offline version that users can pay for and keep. Alternatives, he explained, "want your data, they want your prompts, they want to learn more about you.""They want to spy on you," he added.Saltsman recently announced a partnership with Mark Zuckerberg's Meta that will see the technology shared with military allies across the world."It's important for the government to partner with industry and academia and have joint-force operations in this field," he told Blaze News. "I'm thankful for Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and all he is doing to reshape the DOW and help it become more effective."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) took a shot at a social media post by Senator Jim Banks (R-Ind.) on Monday and implied that Donald Trump was at fault for any "shadiness" with the 2020 census data. However, U.S. Census Bureau data clearly shows that Newsom's jab is misleading. "The 2020 Census was a fraud. The Biden admin used a shady 'privacy' formula that scrambled the data and miscounted 14 states. It included illegal immigrants and handed Democrats extra seats. Americans deserve a fair count and I'm fighting to fix it," Banks said in a post on X. The delivery of apportionment data was 'shifted 4 months' from December 28, 2020, to April 26, 2021.Newsom replied to Banks, saying, "Donald Trump was the President in 2020." While Newsom correctly pointed out that Trump was in office in 2020, he misled on who is to blame for faulty calculations in the 2020 census data.RELATED: Counting on chaos: How census miscounts could decide 2024 — (@) The census count began in Toksook Bay, Alaska, on January 21, 2020, and generally opened to the public on March 12, 2020. By April 1, 2020, the official Census Day, "most households had received an invitation to participate in the 2020 Census," according to a government website.However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, several steps for data collection and reporting to Congress were delayed by months, according to a U.S. Census Bureau schedule fact sheet. For example, the original self-response deadline, July 31, was delayed two and a half months to October 15. The window for delivering redistricting data, originally scheduled for February 18 to March 31, 2021, was "shifted 6 months" to August 12 to September 16, 2021, the fact sheet said. Most importantly, however, is the shift of the constitutionally mandated calculation and delivery of census data to Congress. The delivery of apportionment data was "shifted 4 months" from December 28, 2020, to April 26, 2021, the fact sheet noted. By that point, President Trump was no longer in office, and President Joe Biden had taken over.The Brennan Center for Justice confirmed that then-"Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo delivered the population totals and congressional seat apportionments to President Biden on April 26," 2021. Biden was then required to "transmit the population totals and seat apportionment to Congress, which will send the governors of each state certificates showing them how many seats their state will have going forward."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

At least three aspects of the case should lead to free speech prevailing.

Shocking Reveal: DHS Drops Mugshots of Murderers, Pedophiles, and Drug Lords Arrested in Portland

Oh Noes! Portland Loons to Roll Out 'Emergency' Naked Bike Ride to Protest ICE, National Guard 'Invasion'

The Left Lost the Meme Wars

Watch: Trump on Fire, Cracks Up Canadian PM and Press During Oval Office Gathering

There are tons of great deals available during Amazon's Prime Big Deals Day, including popular Roku, Anker, and Ring devices for under $30.

Two men were indicted this week for allegedly using social media to target a federal deportation officer and his wife with calls for violence, according to the Department of Justice.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Tuesday cautioned that President Donald Trump's long-standing interest in acquiring Greenland may not have faded, telling members of parliament it's too soon to "breathe a sigh of relief."