This is how the corrupt Deep State is treating dissenting voices Ben McClintock joins guest host Kate Dalley on The Alex Jones Show to break down the latest SWAT raid in what he claims is a string of unjust harassment by authorities. Don’t forget‚ Infowars relies on YOUR SUPPORT! To continue funding this independent operation‚ we urge you to visit the Infowars Store where you can fund the battle against globalism by purchasing great products such as dietary supplements‚ air and water filters‚ books‚ t-shirts‚ survival gear and much more.

A new Canadian government report reveals a 300% rise in “unspecified causes” of death from 2019-2022 as unknown causes climbed to the fifth leading cause of death in Canada. Some health experts said the stark increase should trigger an investigation into whether the deaths are linked to COVID-19 vaccines. As life expectancy plummets in Canada‚ a new government report claims “unspecified causes” have become the fifth leading cause of death in the country after cancer‚ heart disease‚ COVID-19 and accidents. According to the Statistics Canada report‚ “unspecified causes” in 2022 passed strokes‚ aneurysms‚ chronic bronchitis‚ emphysema‚ asthma‚ diabetes‚ influenza and pneumonia‚ chronic liver disease and cirrhosis‚ Alzheimer’s and suicide as causes of death. Statistics Canada‚ also known as StatCan‚ released the report on Nov. 27 in The Daily‚ the agency’s online news bulletin.  The report generated a slew of nearly identical headlines — provided by Canada’s national news service — in Canada’s leading newspapers along the lines of this one in the Toronto Sun: “Life expectancy for Canadians fell for third straight year in 2022‚ StatCan says‚” followed by the subhead: “More people died of COVID-19 in 2022 than in any other year since the pandemic began‚ report says.” Andre Picard‚ health columnist at The Globe and Mail in Toronto‚ Canada’s newspaper of record‚ called the life expectancy drop — to 81.3 years in 2022 from 82.3 years in 2019 — “a big deal.”Alex Jones' latest bestselling book 'The Great Awakening' is NOW AVAILABLE! Secure your limited edition autographed today! “It’s only the second time this sharp a drop has happened in Canada in the past century‚” Picard said. “In fact‚ life expectancy has been climbing steadily for decades: 71 in 1960‚ 75 in 1980‚ 79 in 2000 and 82.3 in 2019.” COVID-19 deaths in Canada decreased to 14‚466 in 2021 from 16‚313 in 2020‚ the report shows. Canada is on track for about 7‚000 COVID-19 deaths in 2023‚ Picard said.  COVID-19 deaths can’t account for Canada’s 7.3 % increase in total deaths in 2022 compared with 2021 — or for the country’s 17% increase in total deaths over the historic norm of 2019‚ or the historic drop in life expectancy in Canada and worldwide‚ Picard said.   Like many mainstream journalists and public health officials in the U.S. examining the U.S. drop in life expectancy‚ Picard blamed chronic diseases‚ drug overdoses‚ opioid deaths‚ smoking‚ unhealthy diets and “indifference” for the decline in Canada. “There are virtually no mitigation measures like masking any more‚ and vaccination rates have fallen sharply‚” he wrote. But Drs. Pierre Kory and Peter McCullough told The Defender they believe the most important and startling fact contained in the report is the 300% increase from 2019 to 2022 in “unspecified causes” of death in Canada. McCullough‚ a highly published cardiologist who developed a widely used early treatment protocol for COVID-19‚ said the dramatic rise in deaths from “unspecified causes” in Canada represents a seismic and disturbing shift in Western medicine. “Prior to the pandemic‚ death in Western countries was well understood‚” McCullough said‚ with 40% due to known cardiovascular‚ 40% due to terminal neoplastic disease (cancer) and 20% due to other known causes such as homicide‚ suicide‚ drug overdoses and accidents.” He added: “Since the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines‚ we have witnessed unprecedented deaths without antecedent disease. A large autopsy series published by Hulscher et al‚ found that 73.9% of the deaths after COVID-19 vaccination were due to problems caused by the shots.” McCullough cited the hundreds of studies examining post-vaccine‚ spike-protein-related injuries and deaths and the millions of deaths and injuries reported by citizens in the U.S. and Europe to their governments following mRNA vaccination. “All deaths should be categorized according to the doses and dates of COVID-19 vaccination‚” McCullough said. “Unless proven otherwise‚ ‘unspecified death’ should be attributed to a fatal COVID-19 vaccine injury syndrome‚” McCullough said. Kory‚ the former University of Wisconsin professor of medicine and president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance‚ told The Defender the evidence is overwhelming that the COVID-19 mRNA shots caused more deaths and injuries across the Western world than any prior drug or vaccine in history.     “The answer as to why ‘unspecified causes’ are now a leading cause of death is plain and simple‚” Kory said. “That cause is the one medical intervention that the world’s governments and media have championed since the start [of the pandemic]. … The mRNA platform technology is and has been a colossal failure in both efficacy and safety.” Kory and journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer on Tuesday published an opinion piece in The Hill calling on governments and public health officials to study and address the problem of a global historic rise in mortality thus far not recognized by officials and not reported by mainstream journalists. On Dec. 13‚ the essay was trending as the first or second most popular story on The Hill’s website‚ which claims 32.5 million monthly unique visitors.     U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Robert Califf on Nov. 30 published an extraordinary thread of posts on X (formerly Twitter) calling for a society-wide “all hands on deck” approach to solve the problem of the “catastrophic” decline in U.S. life expectancy.  “JAMA Internal Medicine published earlier this month that our overall life expectancy has dropped to 76 years‚ and remarkably‚ that male life expectancy in the U.S. has dropped to 73 years‚” Califf wrote. But Kory said the FDA commissioner’s post‚ “which hit on smoking‚ diet‚ chronic illness and healthcare‚ ignored the obvious: People are dying in abnormally high numbers even now and long since COVID waned. Yet public health agencies and medical societies are silent.” The FDA and mainstream media are ignoring the fact that life insurers have been “sounding the alarm over these unexpected or‚ ‘excess‚’ deaths‚ which claimed 158‚000 more Americans in the first nine months of 2023 than in the same period in 2019‚” Kory wrote. “That exceeds America’s combined losses from every war since Vietnam. Congress should urgently work with insurance experts to investigate this troubling trend.” Amy Kelly‚ COO of DailyClout and the program director of the Pfizer Documents Analysis Project‚ said that for an autopsy to reach a proper diagnosis of an mRNA-vaccine-caused death‚ “histopathological examination of tissues from all over the body is necessary. Most of the time‚ even if an autopsy is performed‚ the histopathological examination of tissues is not.” She cited an interview with Dr. Arne Burkhardt‚ who describes the types of testing the coroners must perform but seldom do.  Dr. Robert Chandler‚ a Los Angeles orthopedic surgeon who taught at the University of Southern California medical school‚ identified “entire new disease categories” he calls “CoVax Diseases” in his study of Pfizer’s 450‚000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine documents‚ documents the FDA was forced to release via a court order‚ Kelly said. “It makes sense that the unspecified causes of death have increased so much‚” Kelly said. “When a patient dies with either multiple diseases all at one time or with a previously unseen disease state‚ both of which happen with ‘CoVax Diseases’ Dr. Chandler has identified‚ I would imagine many doctors and/or coroners don’t know how to categorize those causes of death. That would lead to ‘cause unknown’ categorization of deaths.” According to Naomi Wolf‚ author of “Facing the Beast: Courage‚ Faith and Resistance in a New Dark Age‚” “In the preindustrial world‚ people died mysteriously. But in the modern Western world‚ there are no mystery deaths. Every death has a death certificate which by law must identify a cause of death.” “A minor rise in unattributed deaths is a problem that needs investigation‚” Wolf said. “A major rise‚ such as you’ve identified‚ does not indicate a mass mystery to doctors and coroners‚ but rather it is evidence of a problem with state record-keeping — some bureaucratic malfeasance at a grand scale.” 

New research has confirmed what was obvious to anyone who studied the data and evidence over the past few years: masking children was all for nothing. There have clearly been many‚ MANY aspects of our Covid response that were and remain inexcusable. Vaccine passports and mandates‚ the nonsensical curfews and capacity limits‚ general mask mandates‚ and of course‚ closing beaches‚ should never been forgotten. But few‚ if any of our pointless‚ ineffective Covid-era restrictions were as indefensible as child masking. And thanks to the awe-inspiring incompetence of the CDC and Dr. Anthony Fauci‚ the United States was a global outlier; obsessively dedicated to forcing toddlers as young as 2-years-old to wear masks. Schools‚ youth programs‚ camps‚ on airplanes…anywhere children gathered‚ they were forcibly masked. Horrifying videos emerged of teachers or flight attendants putting masks on crying children. Calls to mask children in schools have disturbingly continued into late 2023 in certain parts of the country.URGENT! Keep Alex Jones in the fight against the NWO! Please pray &; contribute at DefendJones.com today! But new research has confirmed what was obvious to anyone who studied the data and evidence over the past few years: it was all for nothing. Child Masking is Ineffective‚ New Study Finds “Trust the science‚” “Follow the data‚” “Listen to the experts.” Starting in 2020‚ those phrases became a relentless mantra of an oppressive government/pharma/media playbook. Instead of examining the actual evidence‚ data‚ and pre-Covid consensus‚ politicians‚ administrators‚ and huge swaths of the public put their faith and trust in a few unreliable‚ self-interested individuals. And with disastrous results. Following the actual evidence would‚ in theory‚ have meant using evidence-based methods as espoused by experts in that field‚ such as Carl Heneghan from Oxford University. Primarily‚ that means using a hierarchy of studies‚ based on quality‚ to create systematic reviews of well-conducted research. Instead‚ we were fed the CDC’s reporting of non-statistically significant results based on phone surveys‚ and we watched as those results were included in pro-masking reviews designed to promote an ineffective policy. But a new systematic review from Tracy Beth Høeg and a number of other researchers has just been released on mask mandates for children. And unlike the pro-mask propaganda‚ it actually attempts to use high-quality evidence to come to its conclusion. Background Mask mandates for children during the Covid-19 pandemic varied in different locations. A risk-benefit analysis of this intervention has not yet been performed. In this study‚ we performed a systematic review to assess research on the effectiveness of mask wearing in children. They even used independent reviewers to ensure that there was no bias involved in the study selection criteria. Methods We performed database searches up to February 2023. The studies were screened by title and abstract‚ and included studies were further screened as full-text references. A risk-of-bias analysis was performed by two independent reviewers and adjudicated by a third reviewer. That meant that out of 597 studies screened‚ just 22 were included after meeting the criteria. And in a sign of how the CDC abdicated their responsibility‚ none were randomized controlled trials. Sure enough‚ when filtering out information at a risk of serious bias or confounding‚ there was no association between forcing kids to wear masks and infection or transmission. Results There were no randomised controlled trials in children assessing the benefits of mask wearing to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection or transmission. The six observational studies reporting an association between child masking and lower infection rate or antibody seropositivity had critical (n=5) or serious (n=1) risk of bias; all six were potentially confounded by important differences between masked and unmasked groups and two were shown to have non-significant results when reanalysed. Sixteen other observational studies found no association between mask wearing and infection or transmission. As every intellectually honest scientist‚ researcher‚ or expert would admit‚ their inescapable conclusion is that the “current body of scientific data does not support masking children for protection against COVID-19.” Conclusions Real-world effectiveness of child mask mandates against SARS-CoV-2 transmission or infection has not been demonstrated with high-quality evidence. The current body of scientific data does not support masking children for protection against Covid-19. Who would have guessed? Low-Quality Research Used to Create Low-Efficacy Policy The details of the studies involved in this systematic review are even more damning. Of the six observational studies that supposedly showed a benefit to masking kids‚ all were fatally flawed in important ways. Specifically‚ there were significant confounding differences between unmasked and masked children that undermine any of the reported results. Differences included the “number of instructional school days‚ differences in school size‚ systematic baseline differences in case rates in all phases of the pandemic‚ testing policies‚ contact-tracing policy differences and teacher vaccination rates.” With differences that substantial‚ it’s impossible to determine whether or not the claimed reduction in infection or transmission is due to masks or one or many of those other factors. This is why randomized controlled trials are so important. And why the CDC should have conducted them during the pandemic years. Yet at the same time‚ considering the results of masking RCT’s conducted on adults‚ it’s pretty obvious why they didn’t. Because they knew it would show that masks didn’t work. The researchers also touched on the fact that some of the studies promoted by the CDC saw their effects vanish upon re-analysis. Specifically‚ one of the “observational CDC funded study” in the US claimed to show an association between county-wide mask mandates and pediatric case counts. Yet when subjected to “expanded reanalysis‚” that association disappeared. That initial result though‚ is how you use low-quality studies to launder low-quality information. The CDC funds a study with what it expects are pre-determined results‚ the media reports the results of that study – despite being misleading‚ expert researchers reassess using conventional methods‚ and the supposed benefit disappears. But the correction receives none of the attention of the original‚ because it shows a result the CDC deems unacceptable. Even observational reporting has shown masks don’t matter at a population level for younger aged individuals. Virginia faced massive criticism for ending school mask mandates early in 2022‚ only to see cases collapse after a massive surge with mask mandates in place. Similarly‚ cases in Philadelphia schools dropped two weeks after the mask mandate was lifted in 2022‚ and rose substantially for two weeks after the mask mandate in January 2023 came into effect. As often discussed‚ in a sane world‚ this systematic review would permanently shut the door on further discussions of forced child masking. Higher quality research has confirmed that there is no evidence masks are effective and eliminating bias and confounders unsurprisingly shows the same result with children. But sanity is dead. Therefore the current CDC director defiantly refuses to admit that masking toddlers was a mistake. She doesn’t have to. Høeg and the other researchers who conducted this review said it for her. Republished from the author’s Substack

British systems are in danger due to a chronic lack of investment‚ according to a government study The United Kingdom is vulnerable to a “catastrophic” cyber attack that could cripple large sections of its most critical infrastructure‚ a parliamentary report has warned. The report‚ published on Wednesday by the UK parliament’s Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy (JCNSS)‚ claims that the government failed to adequately invest in systems designed to prevent large-scale cyber attacks. It was also highly critical of the UK’s Home Office – under whose remit the prevention of cyber attacks falls – and said that former Home Secretary Suella Braverman had neglected the issue. The committee said that Braverman showed no interest in the prevention of ransomware‚ a type of cybercrime in which data and files are stolen and a payment is demanded to return the files or prevent them from being released. “Clear political priority is given instead to other issues‚ such as illegal migration and small boats‚” the report said‚ adding that a “catastrophic” attack – which it said might come “at any moment” – could pose a serious “threat to physical safety of human life.” The UK’s critical national infrastructure vital to the proper functioning of society‚ including energy and water supply‚ as well as health‚ transportation‚ and telecommunications‚ is also in severe jeopardy‚ the report warned.Alex Jones' latest bestselling book 'The Great Awakening' is NOW AVAILABLE! Secure your limited edition autographed today! “In the likely event of a massive‚ catastrophic ransomware attack‚ the failure to rise to meet this challenge will rightly be seen as an inexcusable strategic failure‚” Dame Margaret Beckett‚ the chair of the JCNSS‚ told Sky News on Wednesday. The National Health Service (NHS) was also identified as a possible target‚ with the committee noting that it relies on out-of-date systems which complicate even “simple upgrades” because of a historical lack of investment. Last year‚ NHS patient data was illegally obtained by hackers‚ causing widespread issues to services including ambulance dispatch‚ patient referrals‚ mental health services‚ and emergency prescriptions. The NHS was also struck by a similar ransomware attack in 2017. Additionally‚ the committee also called for a briefing from the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) over concerns that the UK’s democratic process could be affected by a cyber attack ahead of an expected general election next year. In response to the report‚ a Home Office spokesperson said that the UK was “well prepared to respond to cyber threats and has taken robust action to improve our cyber defenses‚” and added that the UK has this year sanctioned 18 people it said was involved in spreading ransomware online. Major AI Developments Set to Be Announced

The proposed EMP weapon would be able to neutralize drones with a directed EMP blast to damage the electronic parts. Faced with the reality that drones are reshaping the modern battlefields in Ukraine and Gaza‚ the Pentagon has been tasked with finding a budget-friendly solution to eliminate these ‘flying IEDs.’ While missiles are too expensive‚ and laser beams are a distant dream‚ the next best cost-effective weapon US military officials are eyeing up could be electromagnetic pulse weapons to counter drone swarms. According to the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) website‚ the US Air Force has published a contract opportunity for private industry titled “Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Defense Against Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS).”  The service outlined the drone-killing features of the new EMP weapon it is seeking: “The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL/RI) is conducting market research to seek information from industry on the landscape of research and development (R&;D) for available Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) solutions towards countering multiple Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). EMP solutions could be ground and/or aerial based that provide effective mitigation against Department of Defense (DoD) UAS groups 1‚ 2‚ and smaller group 3 aircraft.”  As for an aerial-based EMP weapon‚ the service explained: Save 40% on DNA Force Plus NOW! Try it today and see why so many listeners have made it an essential part of their daily routine! “Any EMP solutions hosted on air vehicles will have to be determined to be air-worthy by the Government. DoD must comply with the following general restrictions on UAS: 1. The air vehicle must be based on or derived from US components and electronics. 2. The air vehicle must have sufficient flight hours and reliability data.”  The proposed EMP weapon would be able to neutralize drones with a directed EMP blast to damage the electronic parts – this is a much cheaper solution than missiles that cost tens of thousands of dollars‚ if not hundreds of thousands‚ a piece. Major AI Developments Set to Be Announced

by Stefan Stanford‚ All News Pipeline: – ‘The most blatant examples of predictive programming and cabal symbolism I’ve ever seen’ Back in August of 2022‚ Steve Quayle linked to a video on his website titled “The History of Predictive Programming In Film‚” with Steve leaving an SQnote while linking to that video‚ “Very important topic based on the history of Hollywood’s […]

from SGT Report: Bix Weir is back for a discussion about tyrants like Elizabeth Warren and JP Morgan’s Jamie Dimon who fear a post-Bankster golden age which humanity so direly needs. Thanks for tuning in. LOSE those wrinkles TODAY!! LEARN HOW‚ CLICK HERE: https://bhmd1.com/SGT ^^^Click Above ^^ ———————— Get Predator-Like Night Vision Binoculars This Holiday Season: […]

by Pepe Escobar‚ The Unz Review: MOSCOW – Last week‚ Russian President Vladimir Putin made a notable pit stop in the UAE and Saudi Arabia to meet‚ respectively‚ Emirati President Mohammad bin Zayed (MbZ) and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (MbS) before flying back to Moscow to meet Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi. The three […]