This is going to be very controversial… And I am even a bit conflicted on it, so allow me to simply report what is going on and then I’ll give you my current stream-of-consciousness thoughts as of right now. A website has gone live called CharliesMurderers.com which claims to track and document all hateful and politically-violent comments about Charlie Kirk after his murder. It has already gathered over 50,000 submissions and is growing very fast. See it here:  https://www.charliesmurderers.com The homepage begins with this: The website is apparently tied to this X account: The About page of the website makes clear this is not a doxxing website, but rather a “lawful data aggregator or publicly-available information.” This is not a doxxing website. This website is a lawful data aggregator of publicly-available information. It has been created for the purposes of public education. We seek to collect and archive instances of individuals promoting or glorifying of political violence, much like archive.org or archive.is. We firmly denounce all political violence and criminal activity. This website is being converted into a mass searchable database of over 20,000 entries. Our thoughts and prayers are with Charlie Kirk’s family. I do think that’s a very important distinction. I will never support doxxing.  If someone is private and does not voluntarily put their identity online, that privacy should not be violated.  Especially in today’s world, where you can be assassinated in the neck because someone disagrees with you, doxxing can be fatal. But that’s not what this website does. It doesn’t expose people who tried to remain private, it simply posts and documents people who willingly posted vile, hateful comments about Charlie Kirk online. If you want to post hate like that, it does seem to me only fair that you don’t get to try and run away from it later on.  The Internet is written in ink. One exception I would highlight though, is that it does seem like some submissions are screenshots of private DMs or private text messages and I don’t support those being made public without the other person’s consent. Now to address the Free Speech question, because I can already hear it. “But what about Free Speech, Noah?  I thought you supported the Constitution and the 1st Amendment!  Hypocrite!  You support these people getting fired from their jobs because of something they said?  What happened to Free Speech?” I do support Free Speech, probably more-so than most anyone you know. And this is not in any way limiting Free Speech. All 50,000 of these people have the right to say these things and post them online. But….Free Speech does NOT protect you against all consequences. If I go to my boss at work and I say “Hey boss, I just wanted to tell you you have a big old fat, ugly face that makes me want to barf every time I see it and I wish you would get shot in the neck!” — I probably would be fired from that job instantly. I don’t get to claim “Free Speech” protects my job! No it doesn’t. It protects you from the Government throwing you in prison over words. Furthermore, while I think Free Speech should be absolute, our Supreme Court has ruled it’s not, and there are exceptions even to the First Amendment where you do not get a blank check to say anything and everything you want.  There are limits.  And there are consequences. So there you go! Interested to know what you think….do you support this website?

The Trump administration has drafted a plan to activate 1,000 National Guard troops in Louisiana, reports claim. The troops would reportedly be sent to Baton Rouge and New Orleans. According to reports, National Guard troops would support law enforcement operations in the state’s urban centers. Exclusive: The Trump administration has drafted a proposal to activate 1,000 Louisiana National Guard troops to serve in a law enforcement mission in the state’s “urban centers.” https://t.co/GOjmtQY21L — The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) September 13, 2025 WBRZ explained: The plan, confirmed by the Pentagon, would have National Guard troops support law enforcement in Louisiana’s “urban centers,” but hinges on a formal request from Gov. Jeff Landry, according to the report. Landry has shown support for troop deployment in Louisiana in the past, but he has not yet made an official request. According to The Washington Post, troops would help with drug enforcement and communication support in the current plan. The report comes after Trump has made more than one mention of sending troops to New Orleans in the last several days. The report follows President Trump announcing he would send National Guard troops to Memphis, Tennessee. In addition to the National Guard, Trump said he would bring in the military “if we need it.” Footage below: BREAKING: President Trump just announced he will be sending the National Guard into MEMPHIS Both the Republican Governor AND the Democrat Mayor are happy with this "We're bringing in the National Guard… and the military, if we need it." pic.twitter.com/25fB6IopLu — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 12, 2025 “The Pentagon declined to confirm a report that Secretary Pete Hegseth is planning to activate 1,000 Louisiana National Guard to help law enforcement in the state’s ‘urban centers,'” ABC News wrote. LATEST: The Pentagon declined to confirm a report that Secretary Pete Hegseth is planning to activate 1,000 Louisiana National Guard to help law enforcement in the state's "urban centers." https://t.co/0OzkyXbp0o — ABC News (@ABC) September 13, 2025 More from ABC News: The Washington Post reported unsigned documents that showed a plan that “would allow the military to supplement law enforcement in cities such as New Orleans and Baton Rouge so long as Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican who has expressed support for the idea, asks the federal government for such assistance.” ABC News has not confirmed the alleged documents. In a statement attributed to a “war department official,” the Pentagon said “leaked documents should not be interpreted as policy.” “We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise,” the Pentagon said. In order to use the Guard to conduct law enforcement, the president would need to rely on a state’s governor to agree to mobilize the troops and keep them under his or her command. Otherwise, the mission of the service members is restricted under law to protecting federal buildings and personnel.

President Donald Trump on Saturday blamed the “radical left” for blocking national healing. “I’d like to see it [the nation] heal,” the president said told NBC News. “But we’re dealing with a radical left group of lunatics, and they don’t play fair and they never did.” Trump survived at least two assassination attempts during the 2024 campaign. His comments echo some the president made Thursday about “lunatics” on the “radical left.” The president said he is focused on addressing violence on the left. “I’m really concerned for our country. We have a great country. We have a radical left group of lunatics out there, just absolute lunatics, and we’re going to get that problem solved. I’m only concerned for the country,” the president said while leaving the White House. The president has urged supporters and followers of Charlie Kirk, the GOP activist and founder of Turning Point USA who was assassinated on Wednesday, to respond with “nonviolence.” Numerous prayer vigils and memorials for Kirk have been held across the country in the wake of his slaying. Mounting evidence suggests that Tyler Robinson, the suspected killer of Charlie Kirk, targeted the conservative pundit over politics. The shooter’s weapon, found stashed nearby the event at Utah Valley University where Kirk was killed, contained bullets with anti-fascist slogans and phrases written on the casings. One of the messages read, “Hey Fascist! Catch!” Another included the lyrics from a famous Italian anti-fascist song called “Bella Ciao.” GOP Governor Spencer Cox of Utah said on Saturday that Robinson was “deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideology.” Law enforcement interviews with the suspect’s family members have revealed that Robinson had grown increasingly political in recent years and that he knew of and disliked Kirk in particular. At one recent dinner, Robinson had mentioned that Kirk planned to do an event at Utah Valley University. The event was one of Kirk’s well-known college campus open debates during which the conservative commentator would invite anyone who disagreed with his opinions to challenge him. Family members told authorities that Robinson, a 22-year-old from Utah, had become increasingly political in recent years. The suspect disliked Kirk in particular; at a recent dinner, he spoke of how much he disliked and disagreed with Kirk while also mentioning that the conservative planned to visit Utah soon for an event at Utah Valley University.

Performer Bob Vylan celebrated the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk during a performance, shouting vile insults from the stage as he referred to the Turning Point USA founder as a “piece of s***” and worse. Vylan — who recently made headlines for chanting “Death to the IDF” from the stage at Glastonbury’s famed music festival — trashed Kirk from a stage adorned with a Palestinian flag, saying he’d deserved to get shot. WATCH: BOB VYLAN CELEBRATES DEATH OF CHARLIE KIRK Calls Charlie “An absolute piece of sh!t” “Pronouns Was/Were” “Coz if you chat sh!t, you get banged.” Followed by a gun gesture. pic.twitter.com/rBSkNloxcG — Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) September 14, 2025 “I want to dedicate this next one to an absolute piece of s*** of a human being,” he began, pacing back and forth across the stage. “The pronouns: Was/Were,” he said, prompting cheers from the audience. “‘Cos if you talk s***, you will get banged. Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk, you piece of s***.” He made a shooting gesture with his hand and then proceeded to dance around the stage as the crowd cheered some more. Vylan prompted backlash after his Glastonbury performance when he led chants of “Free, free Palestine” and “Death to the IDF” during the show in June. Police in the United Kingdom even considered formal charges against him at the time. “We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury Festival this afternoon,” Avon and Somerset Police said in a post on X. “Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation.” Festival officials rebuked Vylan in a statement, saying, “We are appalled by the statements made from the West Holts stage by Bob Vylan yesterday. Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.”

'We also launched an immediate internal review and, as a result, the associate involved is no longer with the organization'

'arguably a breach of duty'

'Record of targeting conservatives'