He allegedly threatened the driver after he refused to pull over.

'Monitor and interrupt ICE in our area'

'We have to be their fucking light right now!'

Free speech is dying in much of Europe and in the so-called “free world.” The United Kingdom recently announced its intentions to fine or even ban X, the social media platform, over deepfakes, a sign that things may get worse before they get better. Fox News reported on Monday that U.K “ministers confirmed a possible ban on Elon Musk’s social media platform X amid a widening probe and with the company potentially incurring hefty fines.” This move, according to Fox News, “follows the launch of a formal investigation by Ofcom, the U.K. communications regulator, into whether X breached its legal duties under the U.K.’s Online Safety Act and came after reports that the platform’s built-in AI chatbot, Grok, was used to generate and share sexualized deepfake images of women and children.” The U.K.’s Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said in the House of Commons Monday that the move against X and its “Grok” AI “is not, as some would claim, about restricting freedom of speech” and that a potential ban is all just about “upholding basic British values of decency and respect, and ensuring that the standards that we expect offline are upheld online.” Sorry, that’s a little tough to believe. The Wall Street Journal criticized the U.K.’s move against X in a recent editorial. While the Grok feature to “create AI smut is gross,” the Journal noted, that “…doesn’t mean British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is right to pick this fight, which smacks of selective censorship.” Musk insists that Grok prevents inappropriate underage images and that the only exception is the “adversarial hacking of Grok,” which would be fixed immediately. I not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero.Obviously, Grok does not spontaneously generate images, it does so only according to user requests. When asked to generate images, it will refuse to produce anything illegal, as the operating principle… https://t.co/YBoqo7ZmEj— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 14, 2026 Other AI programs, the Journal explained, allow similar image changes and manipulation to Grok. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that “Mr. Starmer is targeting X because Mr. Musk has taken an unflattering interest in Mr. Starmer’s leadership.” And the U.K. has certainly racked up a notorious record on speech in recent years as Musk has been eager to point out. Real fascism is arresting thousands of people for social media posts https://t.co/lfkQF8MHnk— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 12, 2026 That staggering stat of speech-related arrests in the U.K comes from a freedom of information request from The Times, which reported in April that 12,183 people were arrested under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 in 2023. So, about 30 arrests a day. The total arrests number was actually down slightly from 2022. Now, not all—or even most—of these arrests led to imprisonment. However, it’s clear that to even comment on what could be considered “controversial” (immigration or transgenderism) invites the possibility of arrest, even if the comments were made outside the country. One retired police officer was arrested for denouncing antisemitism. While he was being detained the officers pointed out that his bookshelves contained “very Brexit-y things.” Funny, because Brexit is the law of the land. Given that dubious record, it’s hard to take at face value that the Starmer government’s turn against X is only about photo manipulation or protecting women and children. So, let’s cut to the chase of what this is all about. The U.K.’s crackdown on X is not about protecting their people from deepfakes, and it’s certainly not about “democracy.” It’s about controlling speech. It’s about ensuring that the government’s established narrative about immigration and many other issues is ultimately controlled by the state. This is why they continue to mass import immigrants from countries with significant ties to terrorism, yet block immigration critics on the Right from entering the country. On Wednesday, Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a Dutch political commentator who warns about the dangers of unlimited immigration, announced on X that she had been prohibited from entering the U.K. She wasn’t even given the chance to appeal because her presence was not considered to be “conducive to the public good.” Just days earlier she had criticized Starmer on, you guessed it, X. Holy sh*t.I’ve been banned from traveling to the UK. They revoked my ETA. "Your presence in the UK is not considered to be conductive to the public good."3 days after posting this about Starmer. https://t.co/NqWBtaTkZe pic.twitter.com/lm5lZgL2i7— Eva Vlaardingerbroek (@EvaVlaar) January 14, 2026 “Keir Starmer wants to crack down on X under the pretence [sic] of ‘women’s safety’, whilst he’s the one allowing the ongoing rape and killing of British girls by migrant rape gangs. Evil, despicable man,” she wrote on Friday. She was referring to the Pakistani “groomer gang” scandal that has been downplayed by the U.K.’s Labour Party. The Trump administration has certainly taken note of the U.K.’s censorious turn. U.S. Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers blasted the U.K.’s decision to block the entrance of immigration critics into their country. Countries have been banning and restricting visas on opaque, frivolous viewpoint bases for a long time — Lauren Southern was banned from the UK in ~2018 for blaspheming Allah as “gay” and “trans.”Media and commentators who were silent or approving of these decisions now fault… https://t.co/0CrMc5K3uP— Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers (@UnderSecPD) January 14, 2026 Rogers has said in an interview with the U.K-based GB News that the U.S. is prepared to use its “full range of tools” against “authoritarian, closed societies where the Government bans [X].” That would potentially include the current government of the U.K. As I’ve written before, it is important to put pressure on allies looking to closely cooperate with the U.S. but appear to be going in the direction of our authoritarian rivals. Our “special relationship” with the U.K. and deep connection we have to Western, European nations won’t long survive if their speech policies become like Iran or China’s. Banning X, as China has, would be a serious abridgement of free speech and would be considered a serious shot at the U.S. The Trump administration’s National Security Strategy document published in December even mentioned that the U.S. “will oppose elite-driven, anti-democratic restrictions on core liberties in Europe, the Anglosphere, and the rest of the democratic world, especially among our allies.” Hopefully Starmer and company will see the light and back away from what would ultimately be a disastrous attempt to ban X. At the very least, President Donald Trump and his administration won’t stay quiet about it. The post The UK’s War on X and Free Speech appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The lawyers arguing for men’s ability to compete in women’s sports have begun to realize they have a losing hand, and it’s making them desperate, according to a lawyer on the other side of the issue. “I think the other side is starting to recognize they’re on the losing side of this issue culturally, politically, in every way,” Matt Sharp, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, told The Daily Signal in an interview Tuesday. Sharp spoke after the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two women’s sports cases—West Virginia v. P.B.J. and Little v. Hecox—where the American Civil Liberties Union, representing male athletes who claim to identify as women, is challenging the constitutionality of laws protecting women’s sports. The ADF lawyer said one particular argument demonstrated pro-transgender lawyers’ desperation. “They’re starting to make the case, ‘Well, we’re really only talking about boys that … have been on puberty blockers or hormones or something, so that there is no sports advantage,'” Sharp explained. (After a diagnosis of gender dysphoria—the painful and persistent condition of identifying with the gender of the opposite sex—some doctors prescribe experimental medical interventions. These include so-called puberty blockers—which are also used to chemically castrate sex offenders—cross-sex hormones, and surgeries to make a male body appear female or vice versa.) The ADF lawyer pointed out the “flaws with that argument.” “First and foremost, no amount of puberty blockers, no amount of hormones, no amount of surgery changes a man into a woman,” he argued. “Your sex is written into every single cell of your body.” “To properly understand sex, you have to understand like it is intrinsically rooted in our physiology, our biology, our genetics, and nothing changes that.” Sharp also claimed that studies show disparities in sports performance between boys and girls at young ages, such as 6 years old, long before puberty begins. “So, even science undermines their argument that puberty blockers or hormones takes away this athletic advantage, because it does not,” he said. “I think it’s a very disingenuous argument for them to be making at the 11th hour to try to narrow the case and say, ‘Well, we’re just talking about this particular male, or that particular male,'” Sharp argued. “At the end of the day, the state has an interest to say no male belongs in women’s sports, no matter how you identify, no matter what drugs or surgeries you’ve done, we are going to preserve the integrity of the women’s category.” The lawyer warned that “the moment you crack that door open and the one moment you allow one male to come in and say, ‘Well, he maybe doesn’t have as many athletic advantages,’ then does another male come along and say, ‘I’m not a good athlete, I ought to be on the girls’ team,’ and you end up with [men taking] the entire girls’ category.” Pro-Trans Attorney’s Argument Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked ACLU senior counsel Joshua Block why, under his theory, a boy who isn’t competitive on the boys’ team couldn’t just play on the girls’ team. “We don’t think the boys’ team is for better athletes and you have a back-up team for athletes that aren’t as good,” Block responded. “I think the purpose of the teams is to control for the variable of sex-based advantages so that talented women athletes have all the same opportunities as talented male athletes.” Yet Block insisted that the plaintiff in the West Virginia case, Becky Pepper-Jackson, who goes by the initials B.P.J., has erased any biological advantage through sex-rejecting medical procedures. “What has happened here is, by virtue of her [sic] medical care, B.P.J. has already controlled for those sex-based advantages,” the attorney argued. “So, she is completely in the position that she would have been if her birth-assigned sex were female.” Female Athlete Weighs In Sharp analyzed the cases alongside Selina Soule, a former high school sprinter and jumper who took the Connecticut Association of Schools to court because it forced her to compete against men. “I know firsthand what it’s like to be forced to compete against male athletes,” she told The Daily Signal. “I had to race against not one, but two of them throughout all four years of high school in the short sprint events.” “In the hundred-meter dash, the two of them would be at the finish line, chest-bumping each other while the rest of us girls were at the 80-meter mark,” Soule recalled. “So, it was just never a fair contest.” She remarked that many transgender activists seem to think that “all there is to being a woman is just, you know, lipstick, long hair, and a pair of high heels.” “It’s kind of offensive to us that they create themselves based off of a stereotype of women,” Soule added. The post Trans Activists ‘Starting to Recognize’ They’re ‘on the Losing Side’ of Women’s Sports, Lawyer Says appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Finding the right Jack Russell Terrier puppy adoption option takes research and planning. At DogingtonPost, we’ve put together this guide to help you navigate breeders, rescues, and adoption platforms with confidence. Before you bring a puppy home, you’ll want to know what health certifications matter, which organizations are trustworthy, and how to prepare your space. We’ll walk you through each step so you can make the best choice for your family. Where to Find Jack Russell Terrier Puppies Start with Rescue Organizations Rescue organizations should be your first stop, and here’s why: according to the AKC, most breed rescues report that the majority of dogs come from owner surrender due to lifestyle changes. Russell Rescue, a nationwide network of volunteers, lists adoptable Jack Russell Terriers across multiple states on platforms like Chewy’s Find Pets to Adopt. These dogs stay in foster homes or with their current owners until a suitable match emerges, and adoption typically costs less than buying from a breeder while including spaying or neutering, vaccines, and a microchip. You can search by region, sex, and coat type on Russell Rescue’s site, and many listings include video previews so you can assess temperament before visiting. Use Online Adoption Platforms Chewy’s adoption platform aggregates thousands of dogs from shelters and rescues in its network, allowing you to filter by age, location radius, and compatibility with kids or other pets. Some listings indicate dogs are bonded pairs, which is worth considering if you want to adopt two at once. The advantage here is transparency: you get concrete details about each dog’s name, age, coat type, and state, plus the distance in miles from your location. Chewy’s 24/7 support includes free chat with a licensed vet tech for adoption health questions, which can help you evaluate whether a specific dog’s medical history raises concerns. Evaluate Reputable Breeders Carefully Reputable breeders exist, but they require serious vetting. The AKC breeder resource list provides guidelines to help you avoid puppy mills and scams, and visiting the breeder’s home to meet parent dogs is non-negotiable. Ask about health screenings for vision, brain, and heart-related conditions, and request veterinary records before committing. Online adoption platforms give you a middle ground by aggregating listings from both rescues and shelters, letting you compare options without contacting dozens of organizations individually. Understand Your Options The key difference between paths is speed and selection: rescue dogs are often already housebroken and past the puppy stage, while breeders and platforms give you more control over age and background. Your energy level and lifestyle should dictate which path makes sense. If you need assistance navigating applications or coordinating visits, help channels via phone and live chat are available around the clock. Once you’ve identified potential sources, the next step involves evaluating which specific dog or breeder aligns with your family’s needs and expectations. Evaluating Adoption Sources Before Committing Health Records Tell the Real Story Health records matter far more than a breeder’s or rescue’s word. Request veterinary documentation showing spaying or neutering, vaccination dates, and any health screenings completed before adoption. For Jack Russell Terriers specifically, ask about health screenings for Jack Russell Terriers, as these conditions can emerge in the breed. Reputable rescues provide temporary veterinary care before placement, so their dogs should arrive with clear medical histories. Online platforms aggregate listings that often include health summaries, but contact the shelter or rescue directly to confirm what treatments were actually completed versus what’s planned post-adoption. Never accept verbal assurances alone. A rescue or breeder unwilling to share written records is a red flag worth taking seriously. Ask for copies of all veterinary reports and vaccination certificates before you commit to adoption. Responsible organizations hand over these documents without hesitation or delay. Reputation Signals That Matter Organization transparency reveals trustworthiness faster than marketing language. Nationwide rescue networks publish detailed dog listings across multiple states with concrete information about age, coat type, and current location, which demonstrates accountability. The AKC maintains a breeder resource list specifically to help you avoid puppy mills and scams, so cross-reference any breeder against that database. Read adoption reviews on platforms like Chewy, where past adopters describe their experience with specific rescues and the condition dogs arrived in. Ask prospective breeders directly how many litters they produce annually; responsible breeders typically have one or two, not constant availability. Request references from previous adopters and actually call them. Most importantly, trust your instinct during any interaction. If a breeder discourages visiting their home, pressures you to decide quickly, or avoids questions about parent dogs’ health, walk away immediately. Video and In-Person Meetings Change Everything Many rescue listings include video previews, which let you assess a puppy’s energy, social comfort, and temperament without traveling first. Use these clips to gauge whether the dog matches your household’s activity level. Jack Russell Terriers show fearless and alert behavior from an early age, so watch for excessive nervousness or aggression, both of which require confidence-building training you may not be equipped to provide. Schedule in-person visits only after reviewing health records and reputation signals. During the visit, observe how the dog responds to handling, unfamiliar people, and environmental changes. Reputable rescues and breeders will answer detailed questions about the parents’ temperament, training history, and any behavioral concerns. Ask specifically about prey drive in Jack Russell Terriers, as this affects their suitability for homes with cats or small pets (a critical consideration before adoption). Leave if the organization pressures you or limits your time with the dog. Once you’ve evaluated health records, verified reputation, and met potential puppies in person, you’re ready to assess whether your home itself can support a Jack Russell Terrier’s specific needs and energy level. Setting Up Your Home for a Jack Russell Terrier Puppy Secure Your Space for High-Energy Dogs Jack Russell Terriers need space designed around their specific behavioral traits, not generic puppy setups. These dogs are small but intensely active-standing 10–14 inches tall and weighing 13–17 pounds-yet they require more environmental planning than many larger breeds. Install a fenced yard if you live in a suburban or rural setting, since Jack Russells have strong digging and chasing instincts that will emerge within weeks of arrival. Wire fencing at least 4 feet high works, but bury it 8–15 inches deep because these dogs will burrow under obstacles. Indoors, block access to small spaces where they can hide or cause damage, and remove toxic plants, electrical cords, and anything smaller than a tennis ball they could swallow. Establish Crate Training and Mental Enrichment Set up a crate sized for their adult weight so they can stand and turn around but not eliminate in one corner. Jack Russells respond well to defined spaces, so a crate becomes their safe zone rather than punishment. Stock puzzle toys and interactive feeders before the puppy arrives; these dogs need constant mental stimulation or they redirect that energy into destructive behavior like chewing furniture or obsessive digging. Rotate toys weekly to maintain novelty and prevent boredom. Start Training and Socialization Immediately Training and socialization must start the day your puppy arrives, not weeks later. Jack Russells learn quickly but have an independent streak, so training sessions should be short (5–10 minutes), reward-based, and creative-avoid repetitive drills that bore them. Leash training is non-negotiable since these dogs have high prey drive and will chase small animals without hesitation; daily walks of at least 30–45 minutes are baseline, not optional. Introduce your puppy to other dogs gradually and only with dogs they’ll regularly encounter, as Jack Russells may struggle with unknown dogs but typically get along with familiar ones. Early socialization with children and other pets matters enormously, though the breed is not recommended for homes with children under 8 according to the Jack Russell Terrier Club of America. Plan Realistic Veterinary and Food Costs Budget realistically for veterinary costs: expect initial vaccines, spaying or neutering (typically $200–$500), microchipping ($25–$50), and annual wellness exams ($150–$300). Food costs run $30–$60 monthly for quality kibble, plus occasional treats and training rewards. Set aside $500–$1,000 for unexpected health issues in the first year, and consider pet insurance from providers like Chewy’s CarePlus to manage costs for conditions like patellar luxation that can affect the breed. High-quality food formulated for small, active breeds prevents nutritional gaps that lead to behavioral problems and health decline. Final Thoughts Finding the right Jack Russell Terrier puppy adoption option requires patience, but the effort pays off when you bring home a dog that matches your lifestyle. Verify health records, check reputation signals, and meet puppies in person whenever possible. These steps separate responsible adoption from costly mistakes. After adoption, your real work begins. Jack Russells demand daily exercise, consistent training, and mental enrichment from day one. These dogs thrive on structure and clear boundaries, so establish routines immediately rather than waiting for behavioral problems to emerge. Budget for veterinary care, quality food, and ongoing training support. Schedule a veterinary checkup within days of adoption to confirm the health records you received and address any concerns. Start leash training and socialization right away, as Jack Russells develop habits quickly-both good and bad. We at DogingtonPost provide practical care tips and expert advice on dog health that extend far beyond adoption day, so visit our site regularly for guidance on training challenges and breed-specific information as your puppy matures.

Naughty Talk - UK Speech Police on a Rampage

Consensus: The Supreme Court is Going to Side with State Bans of Trans Athletes

When interracial marriage became a hot topic on the tip of Christian nationalists' tongues this week, the controversial pastor Joel Webbon chimed in — sparking even more debate.“Interracial marriage, while biblically permissible, generally/ordinarily goes against God’s normative design for humanity, nations, and cultures,” Webbon said in a post on X.Dale Partridge, another minister, responded to Webbon’s post, writing: “As a Christian man happily married to a Mexican/Spanish/American woman, I actually agree with Joel Webbon. Interracial marriage is not the ‘ideal.’ Now, like Joel, I do not believe it is sinful, and if providence positions two Christians from different ethnic backgrounds to unite in marriage, it can be a glorious thing (which it has been for us).”=Partridge went on to caveat that interracial marriage “does create a variety of additional hurdles in marriage and family life.”BlazeTV contributor Virgil Walker doesn't quite align with their beliefs, but he also doesn’t feel the need to disparage them for it.“There’s a branch, there’s a segment of the Christian nationalist movement that I’ve warned about years ago, that I wrote about, regarding this ethnocentrism that would take shape and take place. And there’s nothing wrong with ethnic centrality, with thinking about your ethnicity,” Walker tells BlazeTV host Jason Whitlock on “Jason Whitlock Harmony.”“The problem is when we start pushing these morality ideas, these moral issues, these moral ideas, into the context of ethnicity to say, ‘Hey, marriage outside of this is not ideal and here’s why.’ You’re adding to what God has already stated about who we are, about how we’re to function, and even about who we’re to marry,” Walker explains.“What these men are doing are they’re signaling where they stand, and I’m not mad at that. I’m not angry at that at all. I think it’s actually a good thing for them to signal where they stand for those who operate and agree with them to align themselves with that kind of thinking,” he continues.“I do think it is incumbent upon us, as ministers of the gospel, as Christians, as thought leaders, to be clear about what the Bible actually says and not allow anyone to say what God has not said,” he adds.Want more from Jason Whitlock?To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

President Donald Trump issued a warning to the Islamic regime of Iran over lethal state brutality against dissidents, and some say that signs are indicating a strike is imminent.The totalitarian regime has been cracking down on massive political protests from the Iranian people against the despotic state as well as devastating shortages of water and other basic living supplies, reports claim.'May the Death to America crowd meet their 72 virgins tonight.' The president warned on New Year's Day that the U.S. would respond to Iran killing peaceful protesters."If Iran shots [sic] and violently kills peaceful protesters, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue. We are locked and loaded and ready to go," he wrote on social media.Since then, hundreds of protesters have reportedly been killed by the regime, with some estimates reaching over a thousand.On Wednesday, some social media sleuths speculated that the U.S. is getting ready for an attack."The U.S. Air Force’s evacuation of military aircraft from Al Udeid Air Base has begun in preparation of strikes against Iran, with a steady stream of at least 6 KC-135R/T 'Stratotanker' Aerial-Refueling Tankers seen departing the base in Qatar," said one account that posted a screenshot of the military maneuvers from Qatar.The Washington Post noted that a similar evacuation preceded U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear capabilities in June.Some have found users risking large amounts of money on betting markets that the U.S. will strike Iran soon, suspecting that these are people with insider knowledge about the administration's intentions.Others pointed to mass outages at Verizon Wireless as another sign of a possible attack. The outage-tracking site Downdetector documented more than 113,000 reports of customers losing service at the height of the outages at about 9 a.m. ET. "We are aware of an issue impacting wireless voice and data services for some customers," said a Verizon spokesperson to the New York Post. "Our engineers are engaged and are working to identify and solve the issue quickly. We understand how important reliable connectivity is and apologize for the inconvenience."The celebrated Pentagon Pizza Index, however, indicated there was only a small bump in the chances of a U.S. strike. The index measures the activity of pizza delivery locations around the Pentagon based on previous strikes that were accompanied by a measurable increase in pizzas being delivered to the headquarters of the U.S. military.On Wednesday afternoon, the index showed high levels of orders at two pizzerias but lower levels at four others in the area.Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) reiterated the U.S. threat to Iran in his own statement on social media on Saturday."If the Iranian people overthrow the Ayatollah, America — and the entire world — will be much, much safer," wrote Cruz. "May the Death to America crowd meet their 72 virgins tonight."RELATED: Man arrested for driving U-Haul into Iran protesters in Los Angeles was released on $0 bail Major General Mohammad Pakpour, the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolution Guards Corps, reportedly warned that the nation was ready and eager to respond to any provocation from the U.S. as well as Israel."With reliance on Almighty God, under the leadership of the Leader, and through the sacred unity of the Iranian nation, we will nullify the schemes of the rulers in the White House and Tel Aviv against a 'Strong Iran,'" Pakpour said, according to Press TV.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!