A licensed Ohio nurse has been fired after posting a disturbing video wishing severe physical harm on White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt during childbirth, raising alarming questions about political bias infiltrating healthcare professions. See the video below. Nurse’s Disturbing Social Media Post Targets Trump Official Chanda Petrey-Czaruk, a registered nurse and Vice President of HomeFirst Choice healthcare company in Ohio, recorded and posted a video, explicitly wishing that Karoline Leavitt would suffer a fourth-degree perineal tear during the birth of her second child. This type of injury represents one of the most severe childbirth complications, involving extensive tissue damage. The video rapidly gained viral attention after circulation through social media accounts, particularly @LibsofTikTok, generating immediate public backlash against the healthcare professional’s shocking statement targeting a pregnant government official. Swift Institutional Response From Baptist Health Baptist Health announced that Petrey-Czaruk is no longer employed by the organization. The healthcare institution issued a clear statement emphasizing that there is no place in healthcare for language or behavior that calls into question a caregiver’s ability to provide appropriate care. The organization further stated that the nurse’s conduct did not reflect their values or uphold their standards. This rapid termination demonstrates how seriously healthcare institutions must treat breaches of professional ethics, particularly when a licensed professional publicly wishes harm on any individual, let alone a pregnant woman. Meet Chanda Petrey-Czaruk, the Vice President of @HomeFirstChoice in Ohio. She posted a video wishing for Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt to experience traumatic injuries during childbirth. This woman is in charge of a home health care company and is a registered nurse in Ohio.… pic.twitter.com/Epv7mUxJnh — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 20, 2026 Violation of Core Medical Ethics and Professional Standards The incident represents a fundamental violation of nursing ethics, as enshrined in the Nightingale Pledge, which commits nurses to do nothing evil or malicious. Healthcare professionals are bound by core principles of beneficence, meaning doing good for patients, and non-maleficence, meaning avoiding harm to any person. When a nurse publicly wishes serious physical injury during one of life’s most vulnerable moments, it undermines public trust in the medical profession. The targeting of a political figure based on her role in the Trump administration highlights concerning political bias that has no place in healthcare settings where patient welfare must remain paramount. Broader Implications for Healthcare Trust This incident raises serious concerns for conservative Americans about whether political bias affects the quality and safety of the healthcare delivery they receive. When healthcare professionals demonstrate such extreme political animus that they publicly wish harm on individuals based on their political positions, it naturally causes patients to question whether a provider’s personal political views might compromise their own care. The healthcare profession must maintain strict ethical boundaries separating personal beliefs from professional conduct. While Petrey-Czaruk lost her employment, calls continue for Ohio nursing regulatory boards to revoke her license, ensuring she cannot endanger patients due to her demonstrated inability to maintain professional objectivity. Political Polarization Infiltrating The Medical Profession The targeting of Karoline Leavitt occurred approximately one month after she publicly announced her pregnancy in December 2025, sharing that she was expecting a baby girl in May 2026. As White House Press Secretary, Leavitt represents the Trump administration in a highly visible capacity, making her a focal point for political opposition. However, the deliberate creation and posting of content wishing physical harm crosses far beyond legitimate political discourse into deeply unethical territory. This incident demonstrates how extreme political polarization has begun to infiltrate professions that require an absolute commitment to human welfare regardless of political affiliation, threatening the foundational trust upon which healthcare delivery depends. Precedent for Professional Accountability Baptist Health’s decisive action establishes an important precedent for how healthcare institutions must respond when employees violate fundamental professional ethics through social media. The swift termination sends a clear message that healthcare organizations will not tolerate conduct that undermines public confidence in the profession’s commitment to patient safety and wellbeing. While formal regulatory action from Ohio nursing boards has not yet been announced, the public nature of this ethics violation and the severity of harm inflicted upon a pregnant woman make license revocation appropriate. Healthcare professionals must understand that their licenses carry responsibilities extending beyond clinical competence to include ethical conduct that maintains public trust in the medical profession. Sources: The Gateway Pundit – Ohio Nurse Who Posted Disturbing “Wish” For Upcoming Birth of Karoline Leavitt’s Baby Has Been FIRED National Insiders – The Disturbing Wish Directed at Pregnant Karoline Leavitt

Chaos Erupts In Minneapolis After Second Fatal Federal Agent-Involved Shooting

'BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE'

'Partisan journalist'

Undercounting the population in red states like Texas and Florida in 2020 cost Republicans at least six seats in the House of Representatives, while overcounting in blue states like California and New York contributed to 18 new Democratic seats, according to Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Texas. “In 2020, the Census Bureau undercounted in primarily deep-red states like Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas, all red, while overcounting in radical blue states like Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, and Rhode Island,” Hunt told a Nov. 19, 2025, hearing of the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government. “This egregious error led to many states being denied proper representation in Congress and the Electoral College. So much so that these errors costs Republicans … six seats in the House. In addition to the 2020 miscounting, including illegal immigrants in the census has improperly granted radical Left blue states 12 additional seats in the United States House of Representatives. That is a total of 18 seats gain and that is a huge problem. And those are the facts,” Hunt told the hearing. The Census Bureau acknowledged the overcounts and the undercounts in a May 2025 report. The Census Bureau uses its population counts as the basis for determining how many House of Representatives seats are in each of the 50 states. The census counts all present individuals without distinguishing between citizens and noncitizens, meaning a higher head count gives a state more House seats, without regard to citizenship status. It is illegal for noncitizens to vote in all federal elections, as well as the vast majority of state and local contests. Not all of the undercounted states were red, as deep-blue Illinois was among this group, while not all of the overcounted states were blue. Ohio and Utah, both red states, were among the over-counted group, according to the census report. Most congressional Republicans, like Hunt, support requiring Census Bureau counters to at least include a question about the citizenship of every counted individual, while most congressional Democrats oppose such a requirement. The issue has intensified in recent years, especially during the Biden administration’s open-border era in which millions of illegal immigrants crossed into the U.S. Legislation originally introduced in the House of Representatives in 2025 by Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas—the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act—requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote and provides criminal penalties for violations. The measure, which has 110 House co-sponsors, including Hunt, passed the lower chamber but has not been acted upon by the Senate. President Donald Trump supports the measure. Hunt did not address the issue of whether political bias within the Census Bureau’s workforce could be a factor in the significant undercounting and overcounting, but The Washington Stand’s review of Federal Election Commission campaign contribution data for the years 2023, 2024, and 2025 found a huge bias in favor of Democrats among donors who said they work for the agency. During the three years indicated, the FEC records disclosed 4,037 contributions by individuals who listed “U.S. Census Bureau” as their employer. Of those contributions, 3,583 went to Democrats, compared to 455 made to Republicans, for a 7-1 ratio. The average Democrat contribution was for $29, while the average Republican contribution was $229. Interestingly, the total dollar value of the contributions by Census Bureau workers to Democrats was $104,597, only slightly more than the $104,130 total given to Republicans. Federal workers like those at the Census Bureau are covered by the Hatch Act, which bars partisan political activities by government employees while on official duty. The Hatch Act does not limit the right of government employees to work for candidates while off-duty, to contribute to the candidates of their choice, or to participate in activities supporting candidates, as long as federal property is not used in the process. Two-thirds of the Democratic contributions, or 1,999 of the 3,582 total, were given through ActBlue, a digital site that acts as a conduit for campaign funding from individuals to favored candidates. WinRed, the similar digital site created by Republicans to counter ActBlue, accounted for only 253 contributions to GOP candidates by Census Bureau workers. Former Vice President Kamala Harris, the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, received 347 contributions from Census workers, compared to just 69 for Trump, her 2024 Republican rival. Apprised of the Census Bureau employee contribution bias, Hunt provided the following statement to The Washington Stand: “The inaccuracies and deliberate manipulations embedded in Democrat-led Census reporting expose a level of corruption that plagued the previous administration and continues today under radical Left leadership. Despite these efforts, the American people saw through the deception and delivered a decisive victory for Donald Trump in the last election. “Now, with Republicans holding all three chambers of government, we have both the responsibility and the obligation to correct these abuses immediately and restore integrity to the process by ensuring that Census data reflects only United States citizens. “The irony is unmistakable. For years, Democrats have warned of a supposed threat to democracy, while actively engaging in the very practices that undermine it—manipulating systems designed to distort representation and influence elections. Democracy is not endangered by transparency and lawful governance. It is endangered by those who abuse institutions for political gain.” Hunt will not be in the House of Representatives in 2027, as he is seeking the Republican nomination for the Senate in a hotly contested primary that also includes Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and the Lone Star State’s long-serving incumbent, Sen. John Cornyn. The primary election is March 3, 2026. Originally published by The Washington Stand The post Bureaucrats’ Political Donations Hint Census Bureau Overcounting for Democrats May Not Be Coincidental appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Here we go again.  By now it is obvious. The media’s candidate for 2028 is the Democrats’ California Governor Gavin Newsom. With a full two years before the next presidential election officially begins, the media has their man. Newsom a Democrat, but of course. The Republicans will also have to pick a new candidate, as President Trump is ineligible to run for a third term. While Vice President J.D. Vance is doubtless the GOP frontrunner, nothing is set in stone. Except for one thing. No matter who the GOP selects, the media will be cheering for Newsom and Democrats. The mistake in understanding this is to believe there is anything new about this.   Not only is media bias for the Democrat nominee predictable, the media’s devotion to any Democrat nominee is by now a longstanding precedent. How longstanding? Start all the way back there in the stone age of 1960. For an appreciation of this readers can thank the long ago Pulitzer Prize winning political journalist Theodore H. White. It was White who first had the idea of covering the behind-the-scenes goings on of a presidential campaign and writing it up in book form. White did just that, winning his Pulitzer for his groundbreaking bestseller The Making of the President 1960.  The book is a gold mine of behind the scenes episodes in that now-legendary campaign between then-Vice President Richard Nixon, the Republican nominee, and the Democrat nominee, Massachusetts U.S. Senator, the young (42) and movie-star handsome John F. Kennedy.  As White makes crystal clear, the media of the day had a serious bias in favor of Democrat JFK. White wrote this of the media covering JFK: By the last weeks of the campaign, those 40 or 50 correspondents who had followed Kennedy since the beginning of his electoral exertions into the November days had become more than a press corps—they had become his friends and, some of them, his most devoted admirers. When the bus or the plane rolled out or flew through the night, they sang songs of their own composition about Mr. Nixon  and the Republicans in chorus with the Kennedy staff and felt that they, too, were marching like soldiers of the Lord to the New Frontier. And four years later, in the race between Democrat President Lyndon Johnson and the GOP’s “Mr. Conservative” - Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater? The media of the day was preaching essentially that Goldwater was not merely a conservative nut but was extremely dangerous in the nuclear age and would quite possibly start a nuclear war. Safe to say, a full two years before the 2028 election, the media is flooded with stories praising or admiring the Democrat California governor.  Samples:  Fox News hosts get in fiery clash as panelist says Gavin Newsom is 'doing something very smart’  This from the Tribune News Service: Governor Gavin Newsom is smart to roll the dice  From The List: Side By Side Pics Of Gavin Newsom Prove He's Aging Like Fine Wine (Sorry, Kimberly Guilfoyle)  The Economic Times: Gavin Newsom, rather than Donald Trump, is grabbing headlines in Davos - here's what he said  Reuters: Newsom says he was blocked from speaking at Davos  In short, two years before the election the media has already chosen a side. No matter the GOP nominee, the media is Going for Gavin. There is not the slightest surprise here. This is the same old, quite tired move from the media in a presidential election. 1960 is long gone. 68 years back once we get to the next presidential campaign. But not unlike the Law of Gravity, some things never change. And whomever is the Republican nominee, he and his running mate need to be ready to go, understanding that they are facing more than the Democrat nominee -- Newsom probably -- and be ready to take on the Newsom-loving media. Which is already showing itself.

The Department of Homeland Security said an armed suspect was fatally shot Saturday by a federal agent in Minneapolis and that the suspect "violently resisted" a disarming attempt.DHS indicated a firearm and two magazines were recovered.'They have encouraged these reckless confrontations and attacks on our agents and officers.'"At 9:05 AM CT, as DHS law enforcement officers were conducting a targeted operation in Minneapolis against an illegal alien wanted for violent assault, an individual approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun," DHS said."The officers attempted to disarm the suspect but the armed suspect violently resisted," DHS added. "Fearing for his life and the lives and safety of fellow officers, an agent fired defensive shots. Medics on scene immediately delivered medical aid to the subject but was pronounced dead at the scene."DHS also said "the suspect also had 2 magazines and no ID — this looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement." Gun that the Department of Homeland Security says fatally shot suspect was carrying Saturday in Minneapolis.Image source: Department of Homeland Security"About 200 rioters arrived at the scene and began to obstruct and assault law enforcement on the scene, crowd control measures were deployed for the safety of the public and law enforcement," DHS also said.Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said the fatally shot man was 37 years old, the Associated Press reported, adding that the chief "urged people to remain peaceful and not to destroy the city." O’Hara said there was limited information about the shooting and called on people to leave the area and said it’s “not sustainable," the AP added.Democrat Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as well as Democrat U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith of Minnesota seized on the shooting as another opportunity to demand the ouster of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from the Gopher State.Walz, who indicated that he has spoken with the White House, stated, "Minnesota has had it. This is sickening. The President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota. Now."Klobuchar wrote, "To the Trump administration and the Republicans in Congress who have stood silent: Get ICE out of our state NOW.""Another catastrophic shooting in Minneapolis by federal agents," wrote Smith. "ICE must leave now so MPD can secure the scene and do their jobs."RELATED: 'Maga maggots': Guns, body armor, ammo, Palestinian flag found at home of man accused of threatening to murder ICE agents In the wake of the shooting, the Border Patrol Union suggested a shooting likely would have been defensive and condemned the incendiary rhetoric spread in recent weeks by politicians and the liberal media."Border Patrol agents are trained extremely well to protect themselves, their fellow agents, and innocent third parties. When a supposed 'peaceful' protester brings a weapon (such as a loaded handgun) and brandishes it, there are going to severe consequences and repercussions," said the union."We have pleaded with and warned the media and the politicians that their irresponsible, hate-filled and false rhetoric is going to get people unnecessarily hurt, or worse, killed when they portray our agents and officers as the aggressors," continued the union. "They have encouraged these reckless confrontations and attacks on our agents and officers who are performing their lawful duties and enforcing the laws that Congress has put on the books."Editor's note: This story was edited after publication to include the age of the fatally shot individual as well as commentary from the Minneapolis Police Chief.This is a developing story; updates may be added.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

We've got some fun facts and great videos of hits from The Doors, Dusty Springfield, BJ Thomas, Tommy James and the Shondells, and more. The post Radio Hits in January 1969: Over and Over appeared first on Best Classic Bands.

Tensions High After U.S. Border Patrol Shoots Armed Assailant in Minnesota

LEEEEROY JENKINS! Krazy Keith Olbermann Offers Tim Walz the WORST Advice Imaginable