By the time Alexander the Great died in the summer of 323 BCE Olympias had over three decades of experience at the forefront of Macedonian politics, first as a wife and then as a mother of kings. She was one of the first ancient Greek women to have a significant impact on politics, both during the lives of her husband and son and following Alexander’s death. Between 323-317 BCE she became a central figure in the early phases of the decades-long War of Successors.   Olympias: Vengeful Queen or Ruthless Politician? Olympias Medallion, Roman, c. 3rd century CE. Source: Walters Art Museum   For decades Olympias had been at the heart of the court of her husband, Philip II of Macedon. A negative tradition portrayed her as a vengeful murderess. Her origins on the edge of the Greek world in Epirus, north western Greece, and a fondness for snakes gave her an exotic, almost demonic reputation. However, Olympias was little different than any other member of a ruthless court which frequently resorted to assassination and execution. Rather than jealous and vengeful, Olympias’ actions were probably rationally motivated by the need to defend her son’s position as heir to the throne and later as king.   The same pattern continued after Alexander’s death and became attached to his infant son Alexander IV, who was made joint king with Philip III Arrhidaeus, another son of Philip II who was previously judged incapable of ruling due to an unknown incapacity. Olympias fought for the rights of her grandson and allied with anyone willing to protect them.   Rivalry With Antipater Death of Alexander the Great, by Nicola de Laurentiis, c. 1783-1832. Source: MutualArt   Olympias had withdrawn from Macedon during Alexander’s reign, partly due to tensions with Antipater, Alexander’s regent. The rivalry with Antipater reached such heights that she blamed him and his family for Alexander’s death. The timing of Alexander’s death had been fortunate for Antipater, who had been summoned by the king and possibly feared for his life. Olympias may have been voicing her belief in Antipater’s guilt, sincerely believing it, soon after her son’s death.   Olympias’ rivalry with Antipater certainly continued after Alexander’s death. Her initial involvement in the War of Successors was to try to prevent an alliance between Antipater and Perdiccas, regent and guardian of the kings, by attempting to arrange the marriage of her daughter, Cleopatra, to Perdiccas. This plan fell through and Perdiccas soon died on campaign in Egypt. But then the situation changed again.   Antipater died of natural causes in 319 BCE. Instead of passing control of Macedon and the two kings to his son Cassander, Antipater appointed a veteran officer, Polyphercon, as his successor. The removal of an old antagonist was probably welcome, especially as Polyphercon reached out to Olympias and asked her to return to Macedon and care for Alexander IV. However, Cassander was unwilling to accept being passed over and soon rebelled. With Macedon itself favoring Polyphercon and the kings, according to Diodorus Siculus, Cassander sought allies elsewhere and built a presence in Greece. Cassander, the son of an old rival and now the enemy of the official guardian of Alexander IV, grew into the major threat to Olympias and Alexander the Great’s family.   Marching to War Eumenos and Roxana, by Alessandro Varotari, c. 1630s. Source: Hermitage Museum   It seems Olympias, wisely, did not trust any of the powerful generals. Diodorus reports that she contacted the relative outsider among the generals, the Greek Eumenes, seeking his continued support of the isolated royal family and saying she placed little trust in anyone. Taking Eumenes’ advice, Olympias refused Polyphercon’s offer and stayed in Epirus to see how events unfolded. She did, however, start to take a more active role, trying, unsuccessfully, to win over the Athenians from Cassander.   When Cassander gained a foothold in Greece, Polyphercon was forced to march south. Not only were his campaigns unsuccessful, but in his absence, the situation in Macedon shifted again. When Olympias decided to return to Macedon, Adea Eurydice, a roughly 20-year-old granddaughter of Philip II and the wife of Philip III Arrhidaeus, took control and allied with Cassander. Adea had reason to fear Olympias. In the past, Olympias had been ruthless with potential threats and was rumored to have caused Arrhidaeus’ incapacity through poison, though there is no supporting evidence for the accusation.   Coin showing Hercules (obverse) and lion (reverse), issued under Cassander, c. 317-306 BCE. Source: British Museum   Olympias could not allow Adea and Cassander to control Macedon and the kings. Polyphercon and Aeacides of Epirus supplied an army, which Olympias symbolically led. Adea gathered her own force and marched to the border with Epirus for what has been called the first war between women. Such was Olympias’ prestige that the Macedonians with Adea refused to fight and defected. Adea and Arrhidaeus were soon captured.   There are different ways to interpret what happened next. Negative sources, such as Justin, depict a vengeful Olympias first starving and then executing Adea and Arrhidaeus and massacring the supporters and family of Cassander. This cruelty lost her the support of the Macedonians, setting up her fall. However, removing the negative judgement from the events allows us to see a different picture.   Adea and Arrhidaeus were indeed executed, but the story that she imprisoned and walled them up can be read either as torture or hesitation. Their eventual executions were handled in a traditional manner, which respected their royal status. A brother of Cassander was killed and the tomb of another desecrated. Since Olympias considered the family responsible for the death of Alexander, this may have been punishment for their apparent treason. A few dozen supporters of Cassander were killed, but it was not a wholesale purge. When she returned to Macedon, Olympias was ruthless, but no more so than any other Macedonian political figure during this violent age. There is no sign of support being withdrawn from her in the remaining months of her life.   Cassander Reacts Image of Olympias on a silver bowl, Romano-British, c. 4th century CE. Source: British Museum   Olympias’s return to Macedon in 317 BCE brought her to the height of her political influence. But by the middle of 316 BCE, she was dead.   Hearing the news that Olympias had returned to Macedon while campaigning in Greece, Cassander quickly moved north. Bypassing potential opposition from Polyphercon’s allies, he was in Macedon before any real defense could be organized. Cassander and his commanders held off Olympias’ defenders and forced her and the royal family to retreat to the city of Pydna. Cassander had moved too quickly and outmanoeuvred Olympias. Both he and his commanders were more capable than Polyphercon and Aeacides while Olympias’s other ally, Eumenes, was far away. The events of 317-316 BCE look more like a military victory for Cassander than support for Olympias evaporating.   Olympias held on in Pydna for several months, enduring a terrible siege. Forces loyal to Olympias and the royal family fought on with little success. Only when the war looked lost did people in Macedon seek terms with Cassander. Sometime in the spring of 316 BCE, with her remaining soldiers starving, Olympias was forced to surrender. Cassander promised to keep her safe, but this promise was soon forgotten.   Final Act  Cassander and Olympias, by Jean-Joseph Taillasson, 1799. Source: Brest’s Museum of Fine Arts   Olympias and the royal family were now in Cassander’s hands, but she met her end with dignity and defiance. Cassander moved cautiously against the still popular Olympias. He convinced the families of some of Olympias’ victims to bring her to trial, refusing to let her speak or make any defense. Next, Cassander offered to let her escape to Athens, but Olympias refused. Instead, she wanted to speak to the Macedonians. Olympias seems convinced that she still retained support. Cassander refused to let her speak.   Less subtle methods were now applied before Olympias could rally support. Two hundred soldiers were dispatched with orders to kill Olympias, but when they confronted her, they could not do it. In the end, only the families of her victims were willing to come forward. A group of them went to the house where she was held. Olympias had already faced down one group of assassins, but there was no escaping her fate this time. While few details are recorded, even the largely negative sources report that the bravery and dignity with which she met death was worthy of the mother of Alexander the Great and the mythical hero Achilles from whom her family claimed descent.   Olympias was right to fear Cassander. Having killed Alexander the Great’s mother, he went on to murder his wife and son, extinguishing the Argead dynasty. In the end, this suited all the potential successors. With the nominal kings out of the way, the remaining powerful generals declared themselves kings of parts of Alexander’s empire, creating the framework for the Hellenistic Age.   Bibliography:   Carney, E. (2006) Olympias: Mother of Alexander the Great. Routledge: New York.   Jouanno, C (1995). “Alexandre et Olympias: de l’histoire au mythe”, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 1995.3 pp. 211-230.

Ok, one quick confession: I didn’t read all the medical journals….I had my buddy ChatGPT assist me to read 200 MILLION medical journals and scholarly articles. But the results most definitely may stun you! I’ve covered this topic before but it continues to fascinate me so I’m covering it again and going WAY deeper! Can Ivermectin treat, stop, reverse or even CURE cancer? **At the end of this article, I’ll show you where you can GET Ivermectin for yourself** First, I have to give my standard disclaimer: I’m not a doctor. I’m not even a scientist. Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA — but let’s be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right? Ok, we all good with the disclaimer? Ok good! Now, why am I even investigating this? Because the more I look into it, the more I find! When I first saw them come out so strong against Ivermectin, I knew it had to be pretty powerful and pretty good for humans in general! I’ve never seen such an aggressive pushback by BigPharma, so I figured it probably did more than just treat COVID19. Then I started seeing reports that it could treat cancer. And I’m not just talking about posts on Twitter or TikTok….I’m talking about peer-reviewed medical journals! I’ll post my original report farther below, but first I want to show you what I found on ChatGPT. I installed a special plugin that connects the OpenAI to a database of 200 million scholarly and medical journals and then I asked it to give me all peer reviewed medical journals that suggest Ivermectin can be effective in treating cancer. I think you’ll find this fascinating — and for those of you who want the nitty gritty details, each article is linked so you can go read the full thing for yourself. From ChatGPT: Here are some scholarly articles focusing on the use of Ivermectin in treating cancer, organized by their publication date (newest first): The Detrimental Effect of Pre-Treatment with Ivermectin on Myocardial Ischemia Publication Date: 2023-10-25 Authors: Sara Cheraghi, Shabnam Babataheri, H. Soraya Abstract: This study explores the effects of Ivermectin (IVM) on cardiovascular diseases, particularly focusing on myocardial ischemia in both ex vivo and in vivo. Neuroprotective effects of ivermectin against transient cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats Publication Date: 2023-09-27 Authors: Behdad Seyyedabadi, Shabnam Babataheri, Ismail Laher, H. Soraya Abstract: Not available. Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells Publication Date: 2023-09-23 Authors: Man-Yuan Li, Jiao Zhang, Xiao Lu, Dong Zhou, Xufeng Deng, Quan-xing Liu, J. Dai, Hong Zheng Abstract: Not available. Outcome of Ivermectin in Cancer Treatment: An Experience in Loja-Ecuador (PDF) Publication Date: 2023-02-22 Authors: Yuliana Jiménez-Gaona, Oscar Vivanco-Galván, Gonzalo Morales-Larreategui, Andrea Cabrera-Bejarano, Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan Abstract: This paper analyzes the use of ivermectin-based antiparasitic as a cancer treatment in the rural area of the Loja province, Ecuador, and the medical opinion regarding its use in humans. Drug repurposing of ivermectin abrogates neutrophil extracellular traps and prevents melanoma metastasis (PDF) Publication Date: 2022-09-05 Authors: Hongjun Zhang, Xiaozhuo Xu, Rui Xu, T. Ye Abstract: This study identifies Ivermectin (IVM) as significantly inhibiting neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation and preventing melanoma metastasis, with a focus on its effects on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and CD8+T cells in a mouse melanoma model. Ivermectin: recent approaches in the design of novel veterinary and human medicines Publication Date: 2022-09-05 Authors: M. C. Velho, Diego Fontana de Andrade, R. Beck Abstract: This review discusses strategies proposed in the last decade to improve the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin and to explore its novel therapeutic applications, including in cancer and viral infections. Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via mitochondrial dysfunction (PDF) Publication Date: 2022-08-26 Authors: D. Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Jae Woong Jeong, Woosol Chris Hong, S. Fang, Hyung Sun Kim, Yun-Sun Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park Abstract: This study evaluates the anticancer effects of the combination of ivermectin and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, indicating that ivermectin exerts synergistic effects with gemcitabine, preventing pancreatic cancer progression. Forging Ahead the Repositioning of Multitargeted Drug Ivermectin Publication Date: 2022-05-16 Authors: S. Atmakuri, Shweta Nene, D. Khatri, S. B. Singh, V. Sinha, Saurabh Srivastava Abstract: This review highlights the role of Ivermectin in unexplored avenues towards the repositioning of this multitargeted drug in cancer, viral, and bacterial infection, and malaria, providing insights into regulatory considerations of drug repurposing and current formulation strategies. Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment enhances antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer through mitochondria dysfunction (PDF) Publication Date: 2022-04-30 Authors: Daeun Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Y. Lee, Hyung Sun Kim, Jung Min Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park Abstract: This study explores the combination of Ivermectin and gemcitabine in enhancing the antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer, focusing on mitochondria dysfunction. Topical ivermectin: an off-label alternative to treat neonatal Scabies in the era of permethrin resistance Publication Date: 2022-02-21 Authors: A. Bassi, V. Piccolo, G. Argenziano, C. Mazzatenta Abstract: This article discusses the use of topical ivermectin as an off-label alternative for treating neonatal Scabies, focusing on the era of permethrin resistance. Repurposing Ivermectin to augment chemotherapy’s efficacy in osteosarcoma Publication Date: 2022-01-01 Authors: B. Hu, H. Tan, L. Yu, Q. Liao, W. Guo Abstract: This research investigates the potential of repurposing Ivermectin to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in osteosarcoma, focusing on its effects on proliferation, migration, and apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. Ivermectin induces apoptosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via mitochondrial pathway (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-12-01 Authors: Nana Xu, Mengmeng Lu, Jiaxin Wang, Yujia Li, Xiaotian Yang, Xiaoshuang Wei, J-L Si, Jingru Han, Xiaojuan Yao, Juanmei Zhang, Junqi Liu, Yanming Li, Hushan Yang, D. Bao Abstract: This study examines the induction of apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by Ivermectin, focusing on the mitochondrial pathway. Progress in Redirecting Antiparasitic Drugs for Cancer Treatment (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-06-01 Authors: Haoyang Huang, Qing He, Binghua Guo, Xudong Xu, Yinjuan Wu, Xue-Rong Li Abstract: This review discusses the redirection of conventional drugs, including Ivermectin, into cancer treatment, focusing on their anticancer potentials and underlying mechanisms. Computational Drug Repositioning and Experimental Validation of Ivermectin in Treatment of Gastric Cancer (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-03-31 Authors: Hanne-Line Rabben, G. Andersen, Aleksandr Ianevski, M. K. Olsen, D. Kainov, J. Grønbech, T. Wang, Duan Chen, Chun-Mei Zhao Abstract: This study focuses on the repositioning of Ivermectin in the treatment of gastric cancer, combining computational predictions with in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches. Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-03-02 Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee Abstract: This research shows that Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, demonstrating synergy with immune checkpoint blockade. Antiviral Drug Ivermectin at Nanomolar Concentrations Inhibits Glycine-Induced Chloride Current in Rat Hippocampal Neurons (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-03-01 Authors: J. Bukanova, E. Solntseva, R. Kondratenko, V. Skrebitsky Abstract: This study examines the effect of Ivermectin on chloride currents in rat hippocampal neurons, contributing to the understanding of its potential use in cancer treatment. Quantitative proteomics reveals a broad-spectrum antiviral property of ivermectin, benefiting for COVID-19 treatment (PDF) Publication Date: 2020-09-22 Authors: Na Li, Lingfeng Zhao, X. Zhan Abstract: This study identifies ivermectin-related virus infection pathway alterations in human ovarian cancer cells, revealing its broad-spectrum antiviral property, including against COVID-19. Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF) Publication Date: 2020-08-24 Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee Abstract: This research demonstrates how Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, showing synergy with immune checkpoint blockade. Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug Publication Date: 2020-05-30 Authors: M. Juárez, Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera, G. Domínguez-Gómez, A. Chávez-Blanco, J. Díaz-Chávez, A. Dueñas-González Abstract: This article supports the clinical development of Ivermectin as a repositioned cancer drug, highlighting its antitumor effects at clinically feasible concentrations. Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin (PDF) Publication Date: 2020-01-01 Authors: Jian Liu, Kun Zhang, Lin Cheng, He Zhu, Tianmin Xu Abstract: This review summarizes the antitumor effects of Ivermectin and its potential roles in cancer treatment, including its impact on various pathways and cellular functions. I could have kept going but I cut it off after 20 results. I also asked it to sort the results by date with newest first, and we ended with 1/1/2020, which means these 20 articles all came out within the last 3 years. How many more do we have in the past decade or two? A lot. Now here’s my original report which gives you a ton more information: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? New Evidence Might Surprise You! Let’s get something out of the way right up front in this article…. I’m not a doctor. I’m not even a scientist. Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA — but let’s be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right? Ok, we all good with the disclaimer? Great! I’m a reporter and I report on what I see…. And right now I’m seeing a ton of people talking about Ivermectin as a possible treatment for cancer. Let me give a SECOND disclaimer: do NOT read this article and stop taking cancer treatments or stop doing what your doctor tells you to do. Listen to you doctor! But….Ivermectin has been called a “Wonder Drug” (more on that in a minute) and NINE new scientific, peer-reviewed studies are showing it may be effective in treating or curing cancer….AND it’s safer that Aspirin! So if it were me, and I can only tell you what I would do, but if it were me or one of my family members, we’d listen to our doctor but I think I’d also be taking a high dose of Ivermectin on the side. Read this for more on how incredibly SAFE Ivermectin is: INVESTIGATION: Can You OVERDOSE On Ivermectin? Now let's dig in and I'll show you everything I'm seeing about Ivermectin and Cancer... We start on Twitter but we will end with peer-reviewed, scientific studies. Nine of them, to be exact. Let's start here: https://twitter.com/StewVet/status/1711943721430729088 Once again, I can only talk about what I would do, but I'm considering going on a high dose Ivermectin treatment once per year as preventative medicine: Believe it or not, high-dose Ivermectin may very well cure cancer.https://t.co/vwUCWFVqFM pic.twitter.com/OsTXkc90wX — HatRabbit ??? (@HatRabbit17) October 7, 2023 And is this why Big Pharma hates it so much? Knew it. I said this well over a year ago. How many times did I tell people to search the NIH site for "ivermectin and cancer" & then read the many the peer reviewed papers? #Ivermectin kills tumors. And cancer. @AprilHunter pic.twitter.com/bIYi6ADs1L — RealAprilHunter (@realaprilhunter) October 4, 2023 Now let's get scientific.... You know, REAL science, not "Fauci-ism". From The Journal of Antibiotics, published 2/15/17: Read the full article yourself here. "...unmatched value of an extraordinary drug..." "...Antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent..." Folks, that isn't my take or someone on Twitter or TikTok. That is a medical journal. Let's do another one.... From PubMed: Read the full article yourself here. "...led many to describe it as a 'wonder' drug." Let's do another... From the NIH.gov: Read the full article here. "...powerful antitumor effects...in a variety of cancer cells." I repeat, this is not MY opinion, this is a medical journal! In fact, there are MANY articles that all come to the same conclusion, across multiple different types of cancers. Can Ivermectin Treat “Turbo Cancers”? - 9 Ivermectin Papers Reviewed The drug once labeled “horse de-wormer” is now showing AT LEAST 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.https://t.co/Nt6kr0j8VH — The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) October 10, 2023 Here are 9 of them, from VigilantNews: Papers reviewed: 2023 Sep.23 - Man-Yuan Li et al - Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lungadenocarcinoma cells 2023 May - Samy et al - Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostatecancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway 2022 Nov - Lotfalizadeh et al - The Anticancer potential of Ivermectin: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic implications 2022 Oct - Jian Liu et al - Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin 2022 Jun - Daeun Lee et al - Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction 2021 Aug - Shican Zhou et al - Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth 2021 Jan - Mingyang Tang et al - Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug 2019 Sep Intuyod et al - Anti-parasitic Drug Ivermectin Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-resistant Cholangiocarcinoma In Vitro 2018 Feb - Juarez et al - The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug You can see that FULL article over on MakisMD Substack here. Now for the most obvious question: Need LEGAL and SAFE Ivermectin? Read This! We just reported yesterday that a new leaked report says airlines are looking to BRING BACK MASKS in October. Yes, really. I fully expect a new "planned-demic" will show up right in time for the 2024 election. Oh they might not call it "COVID" again and probably they won't. But I fully expect a new one to hit. And I'm going to be prepared this time. Whether it comes in the form of a bioweapon or something much more mundane like a tick bite or a Bill Gates' mosquito – you and your family need to be prepared. That’s where The Wellness Company comes in. You know the Wellness Company and their great doctors – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Jim Thorp – are regularly in the media speaking out against the broken medical establishment. Dr. Thorp, one of the nation’s leading critics of the corrupting influence of big pharma, believes that now – more than ever – people should be prepared for the next pandemic. “I’ve strongly recommended “stock piling” critical medications including antibiotics since the turn of the century. This has been an incredible investment as many friends, family and patients have benefited.  Now, in summer of 2023, this recommendation is even more crucial.” – Dr. Jim Thorp The Wellness Company and their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust and their new medical emergency kits are the gold standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy. Be ready for anything, this medical emergency kit contains an assortment of live-saving medications – including ivermectin and Z-pak. The medical emergency kit provides a guidebook to aid in the safe use of all of these life-saving medications. From anthrax to tick bites to COVID and even to a bioweapon like the plague – the Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency kit is exactly what you need to have on hand to be prepared. Rest assured knowing that you have emergency antibiotics, antivirals and anti-parasitics on hand to help keep you and your family safe from whatever the globalists throw at us next! The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit includes:  Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (generic Augmentin) 875/125 mg - 28 tablets Azithromycin (generic Z-Pak) 250 mg - 12 tablets Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg - 60 capsules Metronidazole (generic Flagyl) 500 mg - 30 tablets Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (generic Bactrim) 800/160 mg - 28 tablets Ivermectin 18mg - 7 compounded capsules Fluconazole (generic Diflucan) 150 mg - 2 tablets Ondansetron (generic Zofran) 4mg - 6 tablets 1 virtual consult from a doctor you can trust 1 Emergency Medication Guidebook written by our Chief Medical Board for safe use. The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit treats: Anthrax Bacterial Vaginosis Bite Wounds Bronchitis Chlamydia Clostridioides difficile Colitis COVID - 19 Gonorrhea Giardiasis Lice Nausea & Vomiting Pharyngitis Pinworms Plague (bioterror) Pneumonia Rickettsial Infections Scabies Shigella Infection Sinusitis Skin Infection Strep Throat Syphilis Tetanus Tick Exposure Tonsillitis Traveler’s Diarrhea Trichomoniasis Tularemia (bioterror) Urinary Tract Infection Vaginal Candidiasis Viral Upper Respiratory Infection Don’t be caught unprepared. Don’t be reliant on the broken and corrupt medical industrial complex. Don’t regret not acting today. Order The Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency Kits today! (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and ordering through the links below, which benefits WLT Report. We appreciate your support!) RELATED: We Were RIGHT About Ivermectin From Day One! PAGING DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP! DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP, PLEASE REPORT TO THE OPERATING ROOM! In a 180 degree flip-flop a politician would be jealous of, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now admits doctors can prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID-19. Yes, really. During the COVID-19 plandemic, the FDA did everything possible to prevent doctors from prescribing the antiviral to treat COVID-19. The corrupt agency compared people seeking ivermectin to horses. The federal government, mainstream media, Big Tech, and pharmacies created numerous barriers to prevent COVID-19 patients from obtaining ivermectin for treatment. After millions of Americans lined up to take the experimental COVID-19 shots, the FDA changed course to say doctors can prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19. Straight from the horse’s mouth. Now time for @US_FDA to issue a statement so my patients can get their prescriptions filled at @cvspharmacy and @Walgreens.https://t.co/r5khovfAfe — Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) August 11, 2023 According to The Epoch Times, the "'FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,' Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit." "FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID." Doctors are free to prescribe #Ivermectin to treat #COVID19, a lawyer representing the #FDA said this week. https://t.co/2IaViQTfjX — The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) August 10, 2023 From The Epoch Times: The government is defending the FDA's repeated exhortations to people to not take ivermectin for COVID-19, including a post that said "Stop it." The case was brought by three doctors who allege the FDA unlawfully interfered with their practice of medicine with the statements. A federal judge dismissed the case in 2022, prompting an appeal. "The fundamental issue in this case is straightforward. After the FDA approves the human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no," Jared Kelson, representing the doctors, told the appeals court. The FDA explicitly stated that ivermectin "isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19." However, the agency attempted to excuse its corruption. "FDA made these statements in response to multiple reports of consumers being hospitalized, after self medicating with ivermectin intended for horses, which is available for purchase over the counter without the need for prescription," Honold said. In an interview with Maria Bartiromo, Senator Ron Johnson described the destruction caused by the actions of the FDA. "The doctors I've been dealing with and talking to for yours now, they believe that probably hundreds of thousands of Americans lost their lives because they were denied early treatment," Johnson said. "And they were denied it because the FDA sabotaged, for example, ivermectin. And they said, come on, you all, you're not a cow, you're not a horse. You know, this is supposedly horse medicine. No, this was a Nobel Prize-winning medicine that could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives." WATCH: The FDA has now endorsed treating COVID with Ivermectin! The FDA has blood on its hands. How many Americans senselessly died because Big Medicine called this cheap, readily available Nobel Prize winning medicine horse paste? Thank you Ron Johnson your leadership and bravery. pic.twitter.com/m0d6EonC5Q — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 11, 2023 Read more from the court exchange from The Epoch Times: Ms. Honold said that the FDA didn't purport to require anyone to do anything or to prohibit anyone from doing anything. "What about when it said, 'No, stop it'?" Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, on the panel that is hearing the appeal, asked. "Why isn't that a command? If you were in English class, they would say that was a command." Ms. Honold described the statements as "merely quips." "Can you answer the question, please? Is that a command, 'Stop it'?" Judge Elrod asked. "In some contexts, those words could be construed as a command," Ms. Honold said. "But in this context, where FDA was simply using these words in the context of a quippy tweet meant to share its informational article, those statements do not rise to the level of a command." The statements "don't prohibit doctors from prescribing ivermectin to treat COVID or for any other purpose" Ms. Honold said. She noted that the FDA, along with the statements, said that people should consult their health care providers about COVID-19 treatments and that they could take medicine if it was prescribed by the provider. "FDA is clearly acknowledging that doctors have the authority to prescribe human ivermectin to treat COVID. So they are not interfering with the authority of doctors to prescribe drugs or to practice medicine," she said. We actually told you all of this YEARS ago! Our reporting has been spot on from Day 1, nice to see the FDA catching up to us, but very sad it took so long. Here is one of our prior reports: CONFIRMED: The True Story of Ivermectin Now Coming Out! I continue to bring you the REAL news about Ivermectin.... Real, unfiltered news with no bias. Just the facts, ma'am! Like this one for example: Two Separate Doctors Claim OVER 100 Members of Congress Treated With Ivermectin! Anyone else mad yet? But here's the deal... Now the FDA is backtracking big time, trying to claim they never said you couldn't take Ivermectin. Yes, really...hard to even believe! But it's true, look at this: The scumbags are backtracking. They knew all along Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine prevented covid. But the drug dealers would not making hundreds of billions on these functional drugs. So they poisoned billions of people with the mRNA test drug. Crimes against humanity. https://t.co/nia76r41lW — Phenix Evely, PhD (@evely_phenix) November 22, 2022 And this: I'm not making accusations. This will all come out in the wash eventually. The FDA in the US is already backtracking by claiming that when they said don't use ivermectin it was only a "suggestion." — Other Heather dot connectr ...... (@thedotconnectr) December 12, 2022 They knew all along: https://twitter.com/wolsned/status/1603157314147868672 In fact, some studies are now showing it MIGHT be highly effective at destroying cancer: The horse dewormer strikes again. https://t.co/6qofYPNGHV — Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) December 15, 2022 Catturd right again: Remember when they said Ivermectin was only horse paste - and the low IQ, anti-science, useful idiots clapped like trained government seals. — Catturd (@catturd2) December 14, 2022 A wave of truth is coming out: The FDA’s website states, “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against #COVID19.” But half of the studies to which the FDA points support using #ivermectine against #COVID_19, an @EpochTimes review (by @ZackStieber) has foundhttps://t.co/9DImZ7kvah — Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) December 11, 2022 Here is Dr. Peter McCullough: #BREAKING: Dr. Peter McCullough says the FDA acted criminally and should be sued for misleading the public by spreading misinformation on Ivermectin's ability to treat Covid-19 - causing unnecessary death. pic.twitter.com/Bg3ZS756tc — govt.exe is corrupt (@govt_corrupt) December 16, 2022 Just remember we told you the TRUTH all along... They didn't want you to see this but we showed you from Day 1! Watch it here on Rumble: Remember this disclaimer: I am not a doctor.  I am not giving you medical advice.  I’m a REPORTER.  I research and I report and I give you the full story open and honestly so YOU can decide. Now let's go to another video. This woman below documented her own journey with Ivermectin on video. She starts off looking not so good but makes a swift turnaround in just a few days. This is not me talking, listen to her share and document her own story.... Here is the video from Rumble: Now let's talk about the MSM disinformation campaign, which is a nice way of saying "outright lies and propaganda". Look, I will give you one disclaimer before we get started:  I am a journalist and not anyone with any medical expertise.  I'm not a doctor and I'm not giving medical advice.   I'm just presenting you with the results of my research that the MSM really seems to want to hide.... And I know how to do my research. So let's start with this: Now let's unpack all the lies the MSM has been telling you about Ivermectin. You would assume based on all the MSM propaganda that Ivermectin is only approved for Horses and not Humans. The only problem with that? It's not true. Not even close. Here's the real truth: Yes folks, that is a statement taken from PolitiFact's very own fact-checking page about Ivermectin. But what they do with their "Face Check" is so insidious.... Here's how PolitiFact tries to claim that the TRUE statement is still somehow false, watch these mental gymnastics: This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) It is true that ivermectin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration that year — but not to treat the coronavirus. The drug was approved for strongyloidiasis, a disease caused by a roundworm, and onchocerciasis, or river blindness, which is caused by a parasitic worm. The drug was approved for humans under the brand name Stromectol, National Geographic reported, and since then it’s been recognized as a safe treatment for several tropical diseases caused by parasites. In 2015, two scientists even won a Nobel Prize for their discovery of ivermectin and its use to treat diseases caused by parasites. But unlike, say, river blindness, COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, not by parasites. And as PolitiFact recently reported in a story exploring ivermectin, there’s no conclusive evidence that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The lying and the deception is just so evil, really makes me angry. If you gave me a full year, I couldn't come up with all the twists and turns these people take to turn the TRUTH into a lie. It's sickening. But we're just getting started. Next come the scare tactics and VERY misleading headlines. Like this article from WIVB Channel 4 News: After a recent resurgence in several states, health officials are warning residents to be aware of a dangerous of an unauthorized “treatment” for COVID-19 — often being taken with dangerous consequences. It’s called ivermectin and it’s used to treat and prevent parasites in animals, the Food and Drug Administration explains. The tablets are not FDA approved for treatment of COVID-19 in humans and isn’t even an anti-viral drug — meaning it has no impact on the coronavirus. And because the large-concentration tablets are intended for large animals, these can be treacherous for humans. In addition to not being authorized for treatment, there’s no evidence ivermectin treats COVID-19. “There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.” FDA The FDA and several state officials say they’ve seen an uptick in calamitous use of the drugs, particularly tablets used to treat parasitic worms in horses. While ivermectin is approved for humans to treat certain skin conditions (rosacea) and certain external parasites like head lice, the FDA warns this ivermectin is different than the one used in animals. On Friday, the Mississippi Department of Health was forced to send out a warning to residents about the dangers of the drug after several poisonings. The Mississippi Poison Control Center said at least 70% of recent ivermectin-related calls are tied to people taking livestock or animal formulations they bought a livestock supply stores or through online markets. Eighty-five percent of callers had mild symptoms — these include rash, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain — but one person needed evaluation because of how much they’d taken. More severe dangers of ivermectin ingestion include neurologic disorders, seizures, coma and death. Use of ivermectin should only be taken if prescribed by a doctor for an FDA-approved use. Regardless of the usage and prescription, the FDA warns ivermectin overdose is still possible. Possible interaction with other medications is also a possibility. I highlighted the key parts. A 70% SURGE in Ivermectin Poison Center calls sounds like a lot doesn't it? NPR even reports a 245% surge!  Oh my! Sounds bad until you realize according to NPR that the 245% surge is going from 133 calls to 459 calls....NATIONWIDE! According to the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which collects information from the nation's 55 poison control centers, there was a 245% jump in reported exposure cases from July to August — from 133 to 459. Yes folks, out of 333 MILLION people, there were 459 calls to poison centers. So 0.00000137% of the population. And those are just calls. According to the bold part of the Channel 4 article, 85% of those people who called or had symptoms had MILD symptoms like a rash. The horror! According to the article, only ONE person needed a further evaluation. But is this what you hear in the MSM? No. If you listed only to the MSM fear-porn, you'd think we had a crisis of Ivermectin deaths. The truth is the polar opposite. Anyone else REALLY tired of being lied to? It's why I'm here. I will continue to shout the truth from the rooftops! But I'm not done yet. Did you know that Ivermectin has actually been listed even by the corrupt WHO as one of the most "essential medicines" out there? It's true, you can read it right here until they take it down. But I'm not done yet! Let's cut right to the chase and go to a medical journal to see the true toxicity data on Ivermectin in humans. Seems like something JOURNALISTS should do, don't you think? Let's go to INCHEM.org, the WHO's own website for "Internationally Peer Reviewed Chemical Safety Information". They lay it out in black and white and even a non-medical person like me can understand it. Now let's go down to Section 7.2 of their report which is about Toxicity in Humans: I'm going to bold the key part: 7.2 Toxicity 7.2.1 Human data 7.2.1.1 Adults Amounts approaching the therapeutic doses in animals (100 to 200 ðg/kg bodyweight) are not hazardous to humans. Ingestions of large quantities (10 to 100 times the animal therapeutic dosage) may produce symptoms resembling those observed in animal toxicology studies at high toxic levels. An adult female accidentally self-injected a small quantity (approximately 200 ðg/kg) subcutaneously. Twelve hours later she experienced colicky pain with nausea but recovered within 12 hours (MSD, 1988). Clinical studies of oral ivermectin given in doses from 2 to 200 ðg/kg (maximum 12 mg) have shown a pattern of adverse experiences that included only one serious event (transient stupor). The remaining adverse experiences were considered not serious and were chiefly of the type expected based on the characteristics of the underlying disease and the responses seen after treatment with other microfilaricidal drugs, except for reports of "depression" (not psychiatrically tested) in four patients in open studies (MSD, 1988). 7.2.1.2 Children A 16-month-old boy weighing 15 kg ingested approximately 100 to 130 mg of ivermectin (as an injectable solution). Ten hours post-ingestion he had mydriasis in one pupil, with frequent vomiting, pallor, 35°C temperature, tachycardia, somnolence and variable blood pressure. He developed urticaria the following day, and had recovered after three days (MSD, 1988). Let's start with the very first line: even if you take the ANIMAL dosage, it is "not hazardous to humans". Case closed folks. Seriously, why is this not front page news? Is it because Ivermectin WORKS and actually treats COVID-19 and they can't let that happen? Just asking. How soon will it be do you think before they take down the WHO website or "edit" it? Good thing I took screenshots! Ok, now to address the question everyone is asking: how can I get it? Here is a new update from the FLCCC, which stands for Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. From their page "Prevention and Treatment Protocols" I give you the following: I also highlight their disclaimer: And then you can TAP HERE to get the full list of doctors who can assist you. And if that doesn't work, I have a second source. Let's go to America's Frontline Doctors, who as their name suggests, are on the frontline of this battle. They took an oath to heal their patients and they believe many of the things the MSM wants to scare you away from may actually help heal you. Not my words, theirs.....take a look: From their website: Tap here to go to their site. And here is even more, also from America's Frontline Doctors..... Here is a graphic that has been circulating: And now let's go right to their website.... Here is what they're calling their Wellness Protocol and it sure seems very normal and common sense to me, how about you? Then we have their Treatment Options, which again look very reasonable. Folks, I'm not going to tell you what to do or not do, you have to make up your own mind and consult with your own doctor. But as a non-medical person, doesn't this stuff sound like a good idea? And here it is in a diagram: I will reiterate here once again what they posted on their website: THIS IS NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. Every situation is unique and every person must check with his or her own physician, especially if you are taking any other medication. Good advice.  For everyone. If you are interested in where to buy some of these items, scroll down and I have links for you to some of the best ones. Want even more? Then you need to hear from my friend Chris Burres who joined me last weekend on my show to talk about the power of C60. No, he's not saying it treats COVID or cures COVID. But he is saying it appears to supercharge your immune system and help your body in many different ways.....anyone else interested in that? Me too, and that's why I had him on my show. I had a lot of questions for him about C60 and I found the whole thing fascinating! Yes, I (Noah) personally take C60 and I've been taking it for over a year now. I first started hearing about it online about a year ago and I did my own research on it to find out what it is, where can I get it, and is it really that good....? First, let me give you my disclaimer once again in bold font: I'm not a doctor and I'm not giving you medical advice.  I'm not telling you this is going to treat or cure any condition you have.  I'm just telling you what I have personally experienced.  So here's what I found. I found that C60 is a powerful antioxidant often described as the "perfect carbon molecule". It's an antioxidant that has been measured to be 172x more powerful than Vitamin C!  How about that? Not only is it an antioxidant, but it's an anti-viral and an anti-bacterial and an anti-inflammatory. I'll tell you this....ever since I saw the Deep State going after Carbon and trying to tax carbon emissions with their Al-Gore Carbon Tax, I immediately knew one thing:  I bet Carbon is actually pretty good for you! Turns out I was right. Especially the Carbon-60 "perfect carbon molecule." So once I learned more about it, I then set out to find where to buy it from the most reputable company. I found there are a lot of companies selling C60 that might actually be bad for you and toxic, so I found the one that has the highest standards and safest, most continually-tested product out there....and that was C60 Evo. I've been personally taking C60 for over a year and feel amazing so in light of all the health issues plaguing our nation right now, I decided I'd have one of the founders of the company on my show to break all this down. Chris Burres was kind enough to speak with me today (on a weekend) and I thought it was a WONDERFUL discussion! I learned a lot myself.... He explains what C60 is, why its discovery won a Nobel prize, and the benefits many people experience when taking it. I believe in this product so much after using it for a year I asked the company if I could actually become an affiliate and get all of you a discount.... And they agreed! So watch the video below and then scroll down to grab my code which will get you 10% if you want to try it. Watch here on Rumble: To visit their website go to https://www.c60evo.com/welovetrump/ Use promo code EVNOAH to save 10%. Backup here on YouTube: To visit their website go to https://www.c60evo.com/welovetrump/ Use promo code EVNOAH to save 10%. Want even more on an immune-boosting health plan? Look no further than my friend Clif High. Clif has routinely promoted C60 in the past and here is even more of what he recommends. Take a look: Vaxx repair protocol... pic.twitter.com/stvjmbbCmn — clif is antiselenite (@clif_high) August 11, 2021 If that Tweet gets taken down, here is a screenshot of what he posted: I'm going to give you my disclaimer once again..... DISCLAIMER: I'm not a doctor and I don't practice medicine. And neither is Clif! Neither of us is giving you medical advice. Ok? Ok. I'm just reporting on what others have said. But let's be honest....I think I can probably do better than the "doctors" like Dr. Fraudci, Dr. Birxx who lie to you and serve you up a big heaping pile of propaganda! You can probably take whatever they tell you to do and just do the opposite and you'd probably be pretty close to an ideal course of action! So no, I'm not a doctor, but if being a doctor puts you in the same class as Dr. FRAUDci, then I take not being a doctor as a badge of honor. I'm a reporter. I simply report what I hear and see from others. To paraphrase a once great network: I report, you decide! But what I can report is that it sure looks like some very basic stuff can drastically help you recover and protect your body going forward! Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Chaga Mushroom Tea, C60, and of course hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin may be highly effective! If you scroll down, I have links for you. And let's consider the worst case scenario.....taking more vitamins is almost never a bad thing, right? Your body needs them regardless of what virus is floating around out there. As long as you don't take too much of the fat-soluble vitamins, it's almost NEVER a bad thing to give your body more vitamins. Now let me give you a little more background on Clif and why he's making these recommendations.... Watch this video where Clif High explains what the spike protein is actually doing to your body, why it is definitely a bio-weapon, and how each of the items listed above can help: [iframe src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/sbls9aO7kys6/" width="100%" height="360"] Here is one more where he goes into even more detail and in this one he talks about the power of C60 and why you need to get some! Ever since you were a kid, you were told to get your vitamins! It's basic advice that was good then and is still good now! You need large doses of the right kind of Vitamin C, 10-15,000 IU's of Vitamin D to maintain certain blood levels, and then Clif recommends C60 too. Watch the interview here from Rumble (they discuss it in the first 10 minutes) and then scroll down for links to where you can get the best of each item: If you want to follow Clif's advice, here are some links to the products I like to use. Unfortunately, I can't give you a link to NAC on Amazon because Amazon banned it. One of the oldest and most trusted supplements in the bodybuilding industry and Amazon suddenly banned it right now. Interesting. So we go with the rest of the list.... First is Glutathione: You want to get "Liposomal" Vitamin C, very important. And in case that sells out, which tends to happen, this is another good Liposomal Vitamin C: Now on to Vitamin D. Here is my current favorite and the one I personally take: And a backup Vitamin D3: And Chaga Mushroom Tea: And here is the Zinc Balance: And we end with C60. As I mentioned above, I've been personally taking C60 for over a year and I have not came down with COVID.  Not saying it treats or prevents COVID, I'm just saying my experience. Regardless of COVID, I love taking it and have noticed multiple benefits. Here's what many people have reported: C60 is a powerful antioxidant (172x the power of Vitamin C), antiviral, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory.  I liked it so much I actually contacted the company and got everyone who is reading this a deal. The company is called C60Evo. Go to their website here and then be sure to use promo code EVNOAH and you'll get 10% off your order! I love this stuff and I think you will too. Cheers to good health and a big thank you to Clif High for putting out this information! No, I'm not promising you won't get COVID, but I am saying that TAKING YOUR VITAMINS and powerful ANTIOXIDANTS is a good idea! Be smart. Be safe. Be healthy!

The Looking Glass emerged from the collegiate environment of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey in 1969, when a group of musically inclined students formed a band that would eventually capture the nation’s attention with their signature hit. Originally performing as a cover band at local fraternities and clubs throughout New Jersey and Pennsylvania, the quartet developed a dedicated regional following before catching the ear of Columbia Records president Clive Davis, who signed them to Epic Records. Throughout their relatively brief career, Looking Glass released two studio albums: their self-titled debut in 1972, which featured their chart-topping single “Brandy The post Complete List Of The Looking Glass Band Members appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.

On some days, you could call Associated Press just Associated Press Release. On Friday, they prepared everyone for the leftist protests coming on Saturday with a pseudo-explainer headlined "What to know about ‘No Kings’ protests against Trump’s policies." Nowhere in this 17-paragraph article is a single ideological label -- liberal, leftist, progressive, socialist, not even "Democrat." They're just "opponents." They certainly weren't "extremists," even though the PBS News website illustrated AP with a woman holding a sign that said "The Trump Fascist Regime MUST GO NOW!" That's not how democracy works. You can call Trump a "fascist" and be treated as non-ideological. Seattle-based "National Flex Reporter" Lisa Baumann began:  Opponents of President Donald Trump’s administration are set to rally in hundreds of cities on Saturday during the military parade in Washington to mark the Army’s 250th anniversary, which coincides with Trump’s birthday. The “No Kings” protests are set to take place to counter what organizers say are Trump’s plans to feed his ego on his 79th birthday and Flag Day. “No Kings” will follow several days of nationwide protests against federal immigration raids including in Los Angeles, where Trump’s deployment of the National Guard further agitated his opponents. So not only does the AP refuse to accept "Gulf of America" as a real name, they routinely refuse to use "liberal" or "leftist." Then the article answers a series of promotional questions, starting with "Why is it called 'No Kings'?" The “No Kings” theme was orchestrated by the 50501 Movement, a national movement made up of everyday Americans who stand for democracy and against what they call the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration. The name 50501 stands for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement. They're not objective when they call the leftists "everyday Americans who stand for democracy" instead of "leftists." They're not objective when they don't question the idea that Trump is a king, as if he wasn't elected, and as if he never has his agenda thwarted by federal judges. This whole article is just a set of talking points, helpfully laying out what "organizers say" their protest is.  Why are they protesting on Saturday? The No Kings Day of Defiance has been organized to reject authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics and the militarization of the country’s democracy, according to a statement by organizers. Organizers intend for the protests to counter the Army’s 250th anniversary celebration — which Trump has ratcheted up to include an expensive, lavish military parade.... “No Kings” plans instead to hold a flagship march and rally in Philadelphia to draw a clear contrast between its people-powered movement and what organizers described on their website as the “costly, wasteful, and un-American birthday parade” in Washington. When a "reporter" regurgitates that these leftists are a "people-powered movement," you can tell it's an "AP-powered movement."

President Donald Trump said early on Sunday that if Iran attacks the United States in any way, it would face the might of the U.S. military "at levels never seen before."Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform that the U.S. had nothing to do with an attack on Iran...

A new panorama from NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter shows Arsia Mons, one of the largest volcanoes on Mars, rising above a thick blanket of clouds before dawn.

Some would call it another perfect call. And as soon as Senator Hawley hung up the phone, the Missouri Republican rushed to social media to report on the “great talk” he just had and the promise President…

Did you catch the new ad for the Life360 tracking app? It features a mom singing a Disney-sweet song to her daughter who looks to be high school age: You are my whole wide worldMy heart, my joy, my baby…