ChatGPT allegedly validated the worst impulses of a wannabe influencer accused of stalking more than 10 women at boutique gyms, where the chatbot supposedly claimed he'd meet the "wife type." In a press release on Tuesday, the Department of Justice confirmed that 31-year-old Brett Michael Dadig currently remains in custody after being charged with cyberstalking, interstate stalking, and making interstate threats. He now faces a maximum sentence of up to 70 years in prison that could be coupled with "a fine of up to $3.5 million," the DOJ said...

A Pittsburgh man who violently stalked at least 11 women across more than five states used ChatGPT as a "therapist" and "best friend" who encouraged him to continue terrorizing his victims, federal prosecutors alleged. Brett Michael Dadig, 31, a social media influencer who billed himself as "God's assassin" and threatened to strangle people with his bare hands, faces decades behind bars after he was charged with several counts of interstate stalking and making threats, according to an indictment filed Tuesday in Pittsburgh federal court...

They weren't happy. The post The album that drew Courtney Love the ire of the riot grrrl movement: “Don’t do it!” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

Following President Trump’s historic Abraham Accords that normalized relations between Israel and Arab nations, Argentine President Javier Milei officially inaugurated the Isaac Accords on November 30. The Isaac Accords adapt Trump’s model to the Latin American political and economic landscape and aim to strengthen Latin American and Israeli relations through political, economic, and cultural cooperation. This new initiative was conceived last summer after Milei was an honored laureate of the Genesis Prize (GP) by GP chairman Stan Polovets and Israeli President Isaac Herzog. The prestigious prize and its $1 million award have been dubbed by TIME magazine as the “Jewish Nobel” for honoring “outstanding professional achievements, contributions to humanity, and deep commitment to Jewish values.” (RELATED: Milei’s Reform Agenda Is Bearing Fruit) Milei used the prize money to seed the establishment of his visionary American Friends of the Isaac Accords (AFIA). According to Polovets, the AFIA is a vehicle to “encourage other Latin American leaders to stand with Israel … and reject the ideologies of terror that threaten our shared values and freedoms.” (RELATED: Eastern Horizons: New Alliance Architecture for Israel) The official launch of the Isaac Accords in Buenos Aires at the end of November sets in motion a strategic and operational framework for Israel and Latin American democracies to promote diplomatic cooperation, establish education and cultural exchanges, and combat antisemitic extremism. Promoting Diplomatic Cooperation The so-called pink tide that ushered in new anti-Washington and socially progressive regimes across Latin America also resulted in overtly anti-Israel policies over the past two years. As the Israel–Hamas war unfolded after Oct. 7, new left-wing presidents in Colombia and Chile recalled their ambassadors from Israel, while Bolivia’s then-President Luis Arce broke all diplomatic relations with Jerusalem. The Isaac Accords, however, take advantage of Latin America’s volatile political landscape as new heads of state offer the potential to reverse regional anti-Israel sentiment and increase pro-Israel voting at the U.N. Bolivia is a prime example. Arce’s presidency between 2020 and 2025 followed in his predecessor Evo Morales’s footsteps by reaffirming his country’s alliance with the Iran–Venezuela–Cuba axis and doubling down on claims of Israeli genocide in Gaza. On Nov. 8, the new center-right president, Rodrigo Paz, replaced Arce in La Paz and has already entertained talks to reinstate relations with Israel by lifting visa restrictions. “The decision will allow many Israelis to visit Bolivia again after many years, enjoy its vibrant culture and remarkable scenery, and strengthen ties between our nations,” Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar posted on X. As political tides shift, the Isaac Accords provide the platform to consolidate new pro-Israel alliances. At the core of this diplomatic front is the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and the location of foreign embassies. On Dec. 1, Sa’ar inaugurated Ecuador’s new diplomatic office in Jerusalem. “Several Latin American countries — Guatemala, Paraguay, and Honduras — have already moved their embassies to Jerusalem,” Sa’ar stated, continuing that “the opening of Ecuador’s office in Jerusalem is another milestone on this important path.” Argentina also plans to relocate its embassy to Jerusalem, with an inaugural ceremony scheduled for spring 2026. Establishing Education and Cultural Exchanges Another pillar buttressing the Isaac Accords’ mission is education and cultural exchanges aimed at fostering mutual understanding between Israel and Latin America. To accomplish this, member states will initially rely on existing NGOs and organizations to advance programs already in motion. The Israel Innovative Network (ILAN), founded by Mexican philanthropist Isaac Assa, will connect Latin American students with Israeli entrepreneurs and public officials to equip next-generation leaders “to become catalysts for political change and support for Israel in their countries.” The Israel Allies Foundation (IAF), already working to educate pro-Israel lawmakers in sixty-two countries, will add Isaac Accord member states to its expanding global network. Israel’s top medical institution, Rambam, is also gearing up to train emergency response personnel at the National Children’s Hospital in Costa Rica. Partnerships with other groups, such as StandWithUs, the Philos Project, and Yalla Israel, will strengthen ties between students, public officials, advocacy networks, and Christian groups to support Israel and combat antisemitism. (RELATED: Israel Faces Increasing International Isolation Amid European Delusion) Combating Antisemitism and Extremism Milei’s unabashed support for Israel throughout its current wars and his outspoken Jewish advocacy form not only the bedrock of his Middle East foreign policy but also informs the Isaac Accords’ mission to combat antisemitism and extremism. “While the vast majority turned a deaf ear to the growth of antisemitism in their lands, we denounced it with even greater fervor, because evil cannot be met with indifference,” Milei said on Nov. 27, during the 90th anniversary of the Delegation of Argentine Israelite Association (DAIA). Sa’ar called Milei’s presidency “a double miracle, for Argentina and for the Jewish people,” and called his affinity to Judaism and Israel “sincere, powerful and moving.” Milei also described the Isaac Accords as part of a broader ideological alignment for the free world to “rise together against the threats to liberty seeking to lift their heads.” Countering these threats includes recognizing Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations. In July 2024, Argentina became the first Latin American country to designate Hamas a terrorist organization. In his designatory statement, Milei cited the seven Argentine citizens killed and 15 taken hostage by Hamas on Oct. 7, and the terrorist attacks carried out on Argentine soil in the 1990s by Hamas’s Iranian sponsor. Last spring, Paraguayan President Santiago Peña followed suit, announcing the terrorist designation of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The Expanding Pro-Israel Network. Beyond bolstering Israel’s regional and global position and combating antisemitic threats, the Isaac Accords will also strengthen the bastions of Latin American democracy. The official launch of the accords coincided with Sa’ar’s diplomatic tour to Paraguay and Argentina at the end of November. In Asunción, Sa’ar praised Peña’s efforts to develop “major defense capabilities” and signed security cooperation memorandums that will allow Israel to share its advanced military technologies. The first phase of the Isaac Accords will initially focus on Uruguay, Panama, and Costa Rica, where projects are already on the table for security, economic, technological, and medical developments. In February 2026, Argentine Foreign Minister Pablo Quirno will travel to Jerusalem to convert operational visions into real programs across the two regions for the next phases. Officials involved with these talks have stated that progress is “moving quickly,” and the benefits of these programs could rally other governments to join the accords. Milei’s foreign policy ambitions have positioned Argentina as the regional broker of an expanding pro-Israel network whose pioneering Isaac Accords framework could serve as a model as Israel seeks new partners across the Global South. READ MORE from Bennett Tucker: The New Ceasefire Status Quo is War Military Clashes in Gaza Challenge the Ceasefire Terms Trump in Jerusalem

The politically engaged members of Generation Z have undertaken to instruct the nation as to the proper regulation of technologies such as smartphones, social media, and artificial intelligence. Some argue that lawmakers have failed to mitigate the social and psychological damage the internet is said to have wrought; others, that the fretting of techno-pessimists discounts the desires, cultural sensibility, and common sense of the digitally reared generation. Despite their apparent divergences, many of these arguments amount to a simple, familiar, perennial sentiment: you old folks just don’t get us. I, too, am a child of the digital age. But I do not say I speak for anyone but myself, and I do not address myself to lawmakers or my siblings of this age. Indeed, I have nothing much to say here about public policy or the merits and demerits of the arguments propounded by certain self-appointed spokesmen of Gen Z. I will, instead, offer observations about my upbringing, during which my parents kept me from the all-too-public and often soul-sucking and all-consuming digital world. Having little interest in speaking to the Youth, I speak to parents: You have everything you need to keep your children safe online. (RELATED: Why Free Speech Needs Congressional Action) Parents have at their fingertips — literally — the digital controls needed to supervise and govern their children’s online lives; that is, to protect their children in a new, digital age. “Every parent I know is concerned about the online threats to kids,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said in January. Parents ought to worry about children who spend their time profligately on social media, encounter perverts and predators on adult-occupied digital platforms, or disappear from real life or friendships in favor of digital experiences. But parents need not wait — indeed, they are duty-bound not to wait — for lawmakers to craft and enact so-called child-safety legislation. Parents have at their fingertips — literally — the digital controls needed to supervise and govern their children’s online lives; that is, to protect their children in a new, digital age. (RELATED: Britain’s Online Safety Act Might Come to America) On my 13th birthday, I received my first cell phone, one which resembled the telegraph more than the iPhone. For some years after, I had no portal to the internet besides my parents’ computer, when my brother gave me a hand-me-down laptop (it worked as smoothly as Joe Biden rides a bicycle). I did not have a smartphone until my mid-teenage years, and I was forbidden from social media until age 17 and a half. In short, the internet was largely closed to me until I became an adult. I relate all this to demonstrate that parents can — and ought to — employ an underutilized word: No. My parents did not bar my access to technology without protest (I certainly protested). Nor was I enmeshed in a social group of friends whose parents restricted their digital lives as my parents restricted mine. They endured the ordinary slings and arrows that spring, almost unprovoked, from frustrated teenage boys. No, they had an out-of-the-ordinary conception of my good, and they enforced — compassionately, but unyieldingly. Perhaps the pressures of the digital world have grown since my adolescence. Many parents report that denying their children popular technologies, such as social media, seems to be a sentence of social isolation. Yet, as difficulties mount, the digital safety tools available to parents become more formidable. Apple’s App Store and Google Play now provide prodigious suites of parental controls. A parent of a child with an iPhone can, inter alia, restrict downloads to explicitly approved applications, block explicit content in apps and on the open internet, enable maximal privacy protections, and limit communications to phone contacts — and approved contacts, at that. And besides the features developed by Apple and Google, a panoply of safety tools, applying to nearly every link of the chain of digital technology, is readily available. In short, parents can transform their child’s device into, so to speak, a brick — provided they wish to do so. (RELATED: EU Censorship Metastasizes) If something is to be said about public policy, it is this: many parents, including many worried about their children, do not know of these tools or are unaware of their power and the ease with which they can be used. Although lawmakers have obsessed over bills to regulate social media platforms, they have neglected to ensure that schools instruct students and their families in digital safety. Such states as Florida have not fallen short, and their digital-safety curricula have found success. “This curriculum builds lasting resilience by teaching students critical thinking skills for navigating online spaces safely, from cyberbullying to self-regulating social media use,” as put in a recent op-ed in the Tallahassee Democrat. In every aspect, Americans know that the raising of children ought to be done by parents — and that nobody possesses the knowledge, competence, or love to do it. The parenting of children’s digital lives does not deviate from this rule. Children are the future, but that future is molded, for good and ill, by the decisions made in the present by their parents. American parents do not lack anything — besides knowledge, in many cases — to protect their offspring online. It is to parents that I, a child of the digital age, appeal. The buck does not stop in Washington, D.C., or in state legislatures, but at the kitchen table. READ MORE from David B. McGarry: Conservative Principles Lost in Tech Regulation When Government Competes, America Loses Why Free Speech Needs Congressional Action David B. McGarry is the research director at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance.

Americans often say the 1960s marked the height of monoculture, but that moment was really the midpoint of a broader era. From the late 1940s through the 1980s, national life steadily synchronized. Early television united households around three major networks. The ‘60s delivered a shared political drama and common soundtrack. The ‘70s produced nationwide franchises and blockbuster films. Cable and malls defined the ‘80s and ‘90s. For half a century, Americans consumed the same media, shopped in similar stores, and lived inside a coherent, although narrow, cultural frame. But before that era of sameness, America was a patchwork of distant local cultures. Each region had its own humor, customs, accents, rituals, and expectations. The monoculture didn’t appear out of nowhere; it was built on top of a former polyculture that had evolved naturally over generations. And that’s exactly what makes today’s landscape so strange. We’ve returned to polyculture, but now that polyculture is algorithmic, instantaneous, and globally connected. Instead of local traditions shaping identity, digital platforms create micro-cultures with their own dialects, norms, heroes, and villains — none tied to geography. (RELATED: Brain Rot and the Crisis of Digital Late Modernity) Today, that old world is gone. Technology has enabled us to consume music with AirPods in, abandon brick-and-mortar businesses to shop online, and curate our own digital diet. And yet, a strange mismatch has taken place. The physical world is homogenized … but people flee online because they crave the community they can’t find in the ruins of the old monoculture. We exist in a kind of cultural purgatory. Our physical landscape remains standardized through the same chains, the same signage, and the same corporate minimalism. But online, people splinter into increasingly narrow tribes. Even branding decisions spark outrage. When Cracker Barrel removed the man from the chair in its logo to modernize its look, online commenters erupted. The logo became a stand-in for a larger anxiety: that familiar anchors are dissolving, replaced by flat, placeless design that feels rootless to people who already feel displaced in their home country. This was proof that beneath the slick minimalism of corporate America, people still yearn for something familiar, rooted, and human. (RELATED: Cracker Barrel’s New Logo Sparks Outrage — But Is It Really About ‘Woke’ Politics?) The physical world is homogenized — every store looks the same, every logo redesigned into the same flat aesthetic — but people flee online because they crave the community they can’t find in the ruins of the old monoculture. (RELATED: Gen Z Isn’t Just Online — They’re Living in Parallel Realities) And in the digital world, taste becomes the new tribe. You are what you eat; people identify themselves based on their media consumption habits. Spotify micro-genres, Twitch political streamers, fandom groups on Discord, niche aesthetics on TikTok, and online creators form the basis of identity. A teenager in Ohio may see themselves as part of the “HasanAbi community,” or the “Ben Shapiro crowd,” or the “Swiftie ecosystem” more than they identify with their own school or town. Gen Z, growing up entirely with access to these algorithmic ecosystems, often finds belonging not in neighborhoods or churches but in tightly constructed digital identities. (RELATED: Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Exposes a Generation in Crisis) A young adult on TikTok can go from beauty tutorials to political fury in seconds, firing off indignation about the newest “canceled” personality. The left hurls accusations of fascism; the right warns of creeping socialism. Different rhetoric, same impulse: tribal certainty rooted in shared tastes and shared enemies. That’s collectivism. The best illustration of this comes from how major public debates unfold online. Take the Israel–Palestine conflict. Instead of one national conversation, Americans now absorb totally different moral universes depending on what their feed delivers. One user’s algorithm serves pro-Gaza content framed around combating a genocide; another receives a steady stream of posts about rising antisemitism and Israeli defense concerns. They aren’t just news sources — they become identity anchors. People don’t merely hold opinions; they announce them on their profiles, connect with others who share them, and treat dissent as a threat to group loyalty. The same fragmentation appears in the transgender debate. Some feeds highlight stories of discrimination and emphasize affirmation; others endlessly circulate detransition stories or controversies about men in women’s sports. Two people can open TikTok at the same moment and be told by the algorithm that the other person’s worldview is not just wrong but dangerous. Digital identities solidify, and every video consumed is another brick in the wall that has become one’s worldview and source of self-formation. The conflict becomes existential rather than a civic one. These tribes offer a sense of belonging, but they also flatten the individual into a symbol. Once taste hardens into identity, disagreement feels like betrayal. Argumentation becomes a threat, as does asking genuine questions to better understand different perspectives. Check your impulse. Do you ever pause and ask why someone who disagrees with you thinks what they think, or are you quick to strategize their defeat? People stop asking why someone believes what they do and instead assume they’re merely an avatar of a group, or just another bee working on behalf of a broader hive-mind. Online, you’re not “Sam, who is confused about the conflict”; you’re assigned as “the Zionist,” “the woke trans activist,” “the TERF,” “the fascist,” or “the communist,” based on which posts you liked or who you follow. That’s collectivism in its modern form. The Democrats who fearmonger with warnings of “fascism” and the Republicans who tell you to vanquish “socialism” are not looking out for your interest as an individual American. They are picking a target, freezing it, personalizing it, and polarizing it into a cultural enemy. Red or blue, an average person who is equally as influenced by today’s media ecosystem becomes your enemy. Meanwhile, the politicians, media elites, and others at the helm of controlling the institutions in need of reform avoid your aim as you fire at your neighbors instead. It is a perfect inversion of responsibility; ordinary people absorb all the outrage, while institutions absorb none of the accountability. It is a perfect inversion of responsibility; ordinary people absorb all the outrage, while institutions absorb none of the accountability. This is the tension at the heart of modern America: our inherited value of individualism clashes with the rising pressure of collectivist thinking amplified online. Our culture encourages us to parcel people into categories — red vs. blue, conservative vs. progressive, woke vs. reactionary — while ignoring the one identity that truly matters: our shared humanity. Every individual has a story, a reason for their beliefs, and the capacity for change. Recognizing that is the only antidote to tribal radicalization and moral panic. Even politicians sometimes model this recognition, although perhaps for optics and electoral concerns. Take President Donald Trump’s recent friendly exchange with New York mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. Despite their ideological distance, the so-called “fascist” and self-described “socialist” shared a moment of humor and civility, proof that disagreement does not require enmity. It was a reminder that political identity online is far more rigid than political identity in real life, where two people who supposedly embody opposing “sides” can still interact as human beings. (RELATED: Gooder and Harder, New York) Ordinary Americans can extend the same courtesy. Understanding and empathy are always choices, even when institutions and algorithms push outrage and moral certainty. It is okay to change your mind, or to admit that you don’t have all the answers. It is also just as acceptable to hold your stance and civilly disagree. If America is to survive and thrive, we must reclaim the value of the individual against the tide of modern collectivism. That means refusing to reduce people to their taste, their politics, or their digital identity. That means refusing to define yourself by these same categories. You must be willing to walk in someone else’s shoes, ask why they believe what they do, and appreciate nuance without fear of losing ideological purity. You have the right to be wrong! Gen Z, more attuned than any generation to online tribes, has a unique opportunity. Digital polyculture can produce not only division but also new forms of community — book clubs that cross continents, online support groups, art communities, collaborative spaces, and areas where you can find people existing in your own city who also hope to put their phones down. The same systems that fracture us can also help us build meaning, if we choose to use them that way. The return of polyculture, though digital and fragmented, can be harnessed to create meaningful communities, offline and online, built on curiosity, respect, and shared human experience rather than fear and tribal conformity. Algorithms cannot stop this; they can only amplify division if we let them. Monoculture is dead. Digital polyculture is inevitable. What remains in our control is how we navigate it — whether we allow ourselves to be swept into tribal hatred or whether we insist on seeing each other first as individuals, human beings who belong to the same nation, and the same world. If America is going to endure, we must see one another not as enemies manufactured by the media, but as fellow citizens sharing the same fragile and irreplaceable home. Only you can change your mind. READ MORE from Julianna Frieman: Artificial Afterlife The Real Divide Isn’t Red v. Blue — It’s Male v. Female Don’t Let X Become the Right’s TikTok

As Americans prepare for Christmas, they might recall that five years ago, government bureaucrats warned against holiday gatherings. Consider coronavirus task force coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx, who served in the U.S. Army from 1980 to 1994, attaining the rank of colonel, and from 2005-2014, served as director of the Centers for Disease Control’s Division of Global HIV/AIDS (DGHA). In that role, Birx led the implementation of CDC’s PEPFAR (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) programs around the world. On the COVID task force in 2020, her mantra was “silent asymptomatic spread.” (RELATED: Never Forget What They Did to Us Five Years Ago) Dr. Birx spoke of  “how many people are asymptomatic and asymptomatically passing the virus on.” Basically, everybody was a carrier, so the people needed masks, social distancing, lockdowns, and so forth. The intrepid Alex Berenson was on to her from the start. (RELATED: The Wages of COVID — Part One) “Before COVID, scientists agreed, people who did not have symptoms of respiratory viruses like influenza did not spread illness.” “Birx is obsessed with asymptomatic transmission, the theory that people who are not showing symptoms of illness are very important spreaders of COVID,” which she had to know was untrue. “Before COVID, scientists agreed, people who did not have symptoms of respiratory viruses like influenza did not spread illness.” So as Berenson explained, “Birx likes lockdowns and masks, but she loves forced testing of asymptomatic people for COVID.” She also liked breaking her own rules against travel and holiday gatherings. On Thanksgiving 2020, Dr. Birx visited her parents in Delaware, contending that her mother and father were so depressed they stopped eating and drinking. That did not sit well with people who had been told not to visit loved ones, even if they were dying. If younger people “made mistakes” over Thanksgiving, Birx contended,  “you need to assume you’re infected and not go near your grandparents and aunts and others without a mask.” (RELATED: The Wages of COVID — Part Two) Dr. Birx also told the people of Utah to halt extended family gatherings at Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s, “until we can show that Utah is flattening the curve.” And so on, from the disciple of Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984. (RELATED: The Wages of COVID — Part Three) “The blip from Thanksgiving isn’t even here yet,” Dr. Fauci told reporters in early December 2020. To stop the “surge,” Fauci said restrictions and travel advisories would be necessary for Christmas, and the people should gather “virtually” rather than in person. Out in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom went the second mile. As his official rules for gatherings put it: “Food and drink should be limited to outdoors,” and “while face coverings are removed for eating or drinking, individuals must stay at least six feet away from everyone outside their own household, and put their face covering back on as soon as they are done with the activity.”  The rules warn against “laughing, singing” and “loud talking,” and playing of any wind instruments “is strongly discouraged.” Gov. Newsom added, “Don’t forget to keep your mask on in between bites,” but like Dr. Birx failed to follow his own advice. (RELATED: Rules For Us and Rules For Them) Five years ago, as Katy Grimes of the California Globe recalls, the unmasked Gov. Newsom, “partied lavishly at the French Laundry restaurant in Napa at a dinner, enjoying the ‘Chef’s tasting menu,’ in which the starting meal cost $310 per person, before wine, and notably one of the few restaurants he failed to force out of business.” So the masks, as Lorena Helmsley said of taxes, were for the little people. Dr. Fauci told people to wear no mask, one mask, then two masks. The vaccines Dr. Fauci recommended failed to prevent infection or transmission of COVID, which Dr. Fauci confirmed by testing positive. Last year, Dr. Fauci testified that he reviewed “no scientific evidence” for masking children or maintaining the six-foot distance, “sort of just appeared,” and was not based on any data. This is the man who claimed to represent science. Stanford epidemiologist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, signatory to the Great Barrington Declaration, made the case for “focused protection,” instead of rigid lockdowns and such. National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins tasked Fauci to achieve a “devastating published takedown” of the Barrington scientists, most, if not all, more qualified than Fauci and Collins. By all indications, Newsom never contacted Dr. Bhattacharya for advice on his rules for public gatherings. (RELATED: NIH Announces New Pandemic Playbook) On his last day in office, Joe Biden pardoned Dr. Fauci without indicating any crime he had committed. As the people now understand, his rules had little basis in science. Dr. Birx has revealed few, if any, second thoughts on her view that people with no symptoms were dangerous COVID carriers who shouldn’t visit their parents at Christmas. (RELATED: Dr. Anthony Fauci: What Exactly Did Biden Pardon?) The embattled Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is now director of the National Institutes of Health. So have yourself a merry little Christmas, with no need to wear a mask or pull up your mask between bites. Have yourself a happy new year, but always remember: the struggle against white coat supremacy is the struggle of memory against forgetting. READ MORE from Lloyd Billingsley: 10 Years After San Bernardino Terrorist Attack State of Denial NIH Announces New Pandemic Playbook Lloyd Billingsley is a policy fellow at the Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif.

from PressForTruth: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

from MintPress News: Trump loyalist and CIA contractor Larry Ellison’s purchase of CNN appears imminent, and marks the latest venture into media for the world’s second-richest individual. But Ellison is not alone. Indeed, the world’s seven richest individuals are all now powerful media barons, controlling what the world sees, reads, and hears, marking a new […]

The more I learn about DMSO the more I am starting to think it is truly a miracle compound. Have you heard of it before? For decades, the pharmaceutical industry and its enablers in the FDA, CDC, and mainstream medicine have systematically suppressed the truth about DMSO (Dimethyl Sulfoxide)—a powerful, natural compound extracted from trees that holds the key to tissue regeneration, cancer remission, inflammation reversal, and chronic pain relief. Article by Mike Adams, republished with permission from Naturalnews.com DMSO is one of the most well-researched yet censored substances in modern medicine, with over 11,000 scientific studies documenting its therapeutic potential since the 1960s. Yet Big Pharma buried it under a mountain of false “safety concerns” because it cannot be patented, and worse—it threatens the profitability of toxic chemotherapy, opioids, and synthetic pharmaceuticals. Today, I’m pulling back the curtain on this forbidden cure, exposing how DMSO (alongside nature’s other hidden remedies like fenbendazole and therapeutic peptides) hold the potential to: Reverse cancer (including cervical, prostate, and breast tumors). Regrow some nerves, potentially heal spinal cord injuries, and restore damaged organs. Eliminate chronic pain (without opioids or surgery). Detoxify heavy metals and spike protein fragments lodged in tissues. Supercharge cellular signaling to activate the body’s innate healing power. (Disclaimer: The following is based on decades of research and clinical observations. Always consult a holistic physician before use.) How DMSO works: The science of miraculous healing 1. The Ultimate Cellular “Trojan Horse” DMSO is a polar solvent—meaning it can dissolve and transport both water-soluble and fat-soluble compounds deep into tissues. When applied topically or taken orally, it: Penetrates cell membranes instantly, carrying healing compounds (like curcumin, herbs, or peptides) directly into cells. Breaks the blood-brain barrier, delivering nutrients and detox agents (like glutathione) to the brain. Resets cellular voltage by restoring the body’s bioelectric signaling (as proven by Dr. Robert Becker in The Body Electric). Case Study: A 2014 study in Cancer Letters found that DMSO combined with hematoxylin (a plant dye) induced complete remission in cervical cancer patients by forcing apoptosis (cancer cell suicide). Yet this research was buried because it threatened the chemo-radiation industrial complex that profits from ongoing cancer. 2. Pain Relief Without Opioids DMSO is a potent anti-inflammatory that works by: Annihilating Free Radicals & Oxidative Stress (The Root of Chronic Pain) Unlike Big Pharma’s chemical band-aids (NSAIDs, steroids), DMSO is a potent antioxidant that neutralizes free radicals, reducing the oxidative stress driving inflammation, arthritis, and even neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s. Dissolving Calcified Scar Tissue—Reversing Stiff, Painful Joints Naturally Stiff shoulders, frozen joints, and arthritic pain are often caused by calcification—an accumulation of hardened scar tissue. DMSO dissolves these deposits, restoring flexibility and function without surgery. Blocks Substance P—Shuts Off Pain Like a Switch Substance P is the neurotransmitter that screams “PAIN!” to your brain. DMSO shuts it down, offering near-instant relief for sports injuries, nerve pain, and arthritis—without addiction or side effects. Veterinarians and sports doctors have secretly used DMSO for decades to treat racehorses, athletes, and chronic pain patients—all without side effects. Yet the FDA restricts its use in humans, despite allowing toxic opioids to flood the market, generating billions in profits for Big Pharma. Get DMSO on Amazon here: 3. Nerve Regeneration and Organ Repair The most stunning application of DMSO is its ability to reactivate the body’s regenerative potential. Just as lizards regrow severed tails and human livers regenerate, DMSO stimulates stem cells and neuroplasticity by: Delivering topical peptides (like BPC-157 or thymosin beta-4) to damaged nerves. Triggering photonic signaling (light-based cellular communication) to rebuild tissues. Combining with essential oils such as Helichrysum—another powerful regenerative compound documented to heal severe nerve damage (I used this combo to regrow my own index finger after it was nearly severed in a ranching accident). DMSO—The Cancer Tumor Dissolver & Immune System Warrior Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know: DMSO has been studied for decades as an anti-cancer agent due to its ability to: Penetrate tumors and enhance delivery of anti-cancer molecules such as hematoxylin (while reducing chemo’s brutal side effects). Starve cancer cells by disrupting their glucose metabolism and cutting them off from the body’s blood supply. Boost immune function, helping the body recognize and destroy malignant cells. Yet the FDA ignores the research while approving deadly chemo drugs that bankrupt patients and destroy their bodies. Why Are Vets & Coaches Using DMSO—But Your Doctor Isn’t? While the FDA censors DMSO for human use (despite approving it for bladder inflammation), insiders have relied on it for decades: Racehorse trainers use it to speed muscle recovery. Pro athletes treat injuries with topical DMSO to heal fractures, sprains, and tears in days, not months. Veterinarians apply it on animals because it works without poisoning the liver like NSAIDs. The medical-industrial complex would rather push dangerous opioids (which kill thousands) than allow access to a safe, natural, and dirt-cheap healing liquid like DMSO to be readily available to the public. GET DMSO HERE The great DMSO cover-up In the 1960s, DMSO was on track to become Big Pharma’s worst nightmare: A Journal of Oncology study proved it shrank tumors. Dr. Stanley Jacob (U. of Oregon) used it to treat spinal cord injuries. NFL teams and Olympians used it for rapid recovery from injuries. Then the FDA launched a smear campaign, claiming (falsely) that DMSO caused eye damage in rabbits (later debunked). The real reason for this attack? DMSO outperformed chemo, painkillers, and steroids at a fraction of the cost. Today, Big Pharma still suppresses DMSO by: Blocking clinical trials for cancer and Alzheimer’s applications. Making sure doctors don’t know anything about DMSO, so they can’t tell patients about its miraculous properties. Pushing synthetic alternatives with deadly side effects that addict patients on high-profit opioids. The truth, in summary: DMSO is non-toxic, non-addictive, and effective for: Spinal cord injuries (studies show it reduces swelling and nerve damage). Stroke and brain trauma (by reducing oxidative damage). Burns, ulcers, and skin lesions (speeding healing by 300%). Many cancers such as cervical cancer where it provides a permanent cure, not just “remission.” Yet the FDA protects the opioid racket—while attacking natural medicine… all in order to protect the profits of Big Pharma. Get DMSO on Amazon here: How to use DMSO safely Do your own research. This is not medical advice. But use these ideas as starters for your ongoing research and your conversations with your naturopathic physician: 1. For Cancer and Tumors Mix DMSO + hematoxylin dye (or consider researching phycocyanins from spirulina) and apply topically to penetrate the tissue and kill cancer cells. Also read this MidwesternDoctor.com story about DMSO. Learn about fenbendazole (a potent anti-parasitic with anti-cancer properties) and ivermectin (studied for tumor suppression) as complementary therapies. 2. For Tissue Regeneration and Nerve Repair Research DMSO + Helichrysum oil (applied to injured area) for tissue regeneration. Research DMSO + BPC-157 peptide (a healing peptide that repairs tendons and nerves). 3. For Chronic Pain/Arthritis Research DMSO / aloe solutions at 70% / 30% for use on joints. Consider adding a very tiny amount of magnesium oil (just a drop or two) or MSM flakes for enhanced absorption and to drive MSM into your tissues and joints. WARNINGS: Avoid scented DMSO products (fragrance chemicals = cancer risk). Most DMSO product combinations sold online are filled with fragrance chemicals which can actually promote cancer. Don’t apply DMSO on your skin if you already have fragrance products, lotions, laundry detergents or other toxic chemical products on your skin. The DMSO will drive the toxins into your tissues. Always test for allergies or skin reactions first (apply to a small patch of your skin). Check with your naturopathic physician for guidance. The future of healing is here The human body already knows how to heal itself—it just needs the right signals (light, electricity, and natural compounds like DMSO). While Big Pharma pushes toxic drugs and depopulation jabs, the real cures are hiding in plain sight. Did you know that: Pig bladder stem cells can regrow human teeth. Fenbenazole, ivermectin and DMSO are crushing cancers worldwide. Phycocyanin from spirulina destroys pancreatic cancer tumors (micro-injection research in Japan). Infrared light + peptides assist with longevity and so-called “anti-aging.” Next Steps: Find a trusted source of DMSO. We cannot sell it for regulatory reasons. Currently we cannot recommend a DMSO brand, but we will be evaluating different DMSO brands and making recommendations based on what we find. Join the Free Speech Health Movement at Brighteon.com and Brighteon.social. The War on Natural Healing ends when we fight back with truth. God’s pharmacy wins. (Yes, DMSO comes from nature.) P.S. Enoch, our AI knowledge engine, will soon be free to the public at Brighteon.AI—with uncensored research on DMSO, peptides, and banned cancer cures. Stay tuned! Sources: The Body Electric (Dr. Robert Becker) DMSO: Nature’s Healer (Dr. Morton Walker) Cancer Letters (2014 DMSO-hematoxylin study) MidwesternDoctor.com Enoch AI Database (uncensored medical archives) Get DMSO on Amazon here: ### Follow my podcasts, interviews, articles and social media posts on: Twitter: https://twitter.com/HealthRanger Brighteon.social: Brighteon.social/@HealthRanger Brighteon.io: Brighteon.io/healthranger Telegram: t.me/RealHealthRanger Brighteon.com: Brighteon.com/channels/HRreport Rumble: Rumble.com/c/HealthRangerReport Substack: HealthRanger.substack.com Banned.video: Banned.video/channel/mike-adams Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@healthranger Bastyon: https://bastyon.com/healthranger Gettr: GETTR.com/user/healthranger BitChute: Bitchute.com/channel/9EB8glubb0Ns/ Clouthub: app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/naturalnews/posts My music with MP3 downloads and music videos: music.Brighteon.com Join the free NaturalNews.com email newsletter to stay alerted about breaking news each day. Download my current audio books — including Ghost World, Survival Nutrition, The Global Reset Survival Guide and The Contagious Mind — at: https://Audiobooks.NaturalNews.com/ Download my popular audio book, “Resilient Prepping” at ResilientPrepping.com – it teaches you how to survive the total collapse of civilization and the loss of both the power grid and combustion engines. RELATED REPORT: Dr. McCullough Reveals the Cancer-Fighting Drug Big Pharma Doesn’t Want You to Know About Dr. McCullough Reveals the Cancer-Fighting Drug Big Pharma Doesn't Want You to Know About The COVID-19 pandemic, and the ensuing response by the medical establishment, was an eye-opening experience for tens of millions of Americans. We watched as the medical establishment put the biopharmaceutical complex’s bottom line above the health and well-being of the American people. Sadly, greed in medicine isn’t new and it isn’t restricted just to pandemic responses. Indeed, greed is often the primary motivation for much of our medical establishment’s response to almost every single healthcare challenge we face. This is certainly the case when it comes to the fight against cancer: A recent study in the journal Cancer takes a closer look at the impact of cancer drug prices on pharma revenues. Dr. Daniel Meyers at the University of Calgary and colleagues looked at the total revenue generated by ten large pharmaceutical companies from 2010 to 2019, and compared the revenue from cancer and non-cancer drugs. They found that sales from cancer drugs are becoming an increasingly important part of pharmaceutical companies’ revenue. While the annual revenue generated by cancer drugs increased by 70% from 2010 to 2019, the revenue from non-cancer drugs decreased by 18%. In 2010, 14% of total revenue from these ten companies was from cancer drugs; in 2019, cancer drugs made up one quarter of revenue. Even worse, there is little correlation between the amount of money charged for these drugs and treatments and health outcomes: If we were getting vastly improved clinical outcomes for these expensive drugs, they might be worth the price. But in the US, the cost of cancer drugs is not correlated with clinical benefit, according to a study in The Lancet Oncology. And once the price of a drug goes above $100,000, it doesn’t matter how good the drug is — when people can’t afford it, they won’t take it. It should come as no surprise then, that big pharma and the medical establishment have absolutely no interest in pursuing low-cost treatments. Fortunately, medical professionals like Dr. Peter McCullough are committed to delivering healthcare solutions that are safe, effective AND affordable. This is exactly why Dr. McCullough and his team are digging in to the potential for ivermectin in combatting cancers. According to a new study, the early returns are promising. According to the McCullough Foundation: The study titled “A Review of Ivermectin Use in Cancer Patients: Is it Time to Repurpose the Ivermectin in Cancer Treatment?” was just published in the journal Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica – Drug Research… Based on the most comprehensive systematic review of ivermectin use in cancer patients to date, ivermectin appears to be safe—even in individuals undergoing active chemotherapy. Its broad range of anticancer mechanisms demonstrated in preclinical models, combined with anecdotal reports of cancer-related improvements, support its candidacy for repurposing as an oncologic therapy. Well-designed, large-scale clinical trials should be launched as soon as possible to properly assess ivermectin’s potential against cancer. Indeed, ivermectin in concert with mebendazole has shown even more promise in treating a wide variety of cancers. Mebendazole, an anti-parasitic like ivermectin, has been prescribed for 100 years to help eradicate parasites – which over 60 million Americans have inside their body today, according to the CDC. Safe, Effective and Affordable! If you feel off, a parasite cleanse may help you regain your health. There is no better cleanse than pure lab-tested Ivermectin + Mebendazole, compounded into a single capsule by The Wellness Company. Ivermectin and Mebendazole combine to effectively treat parasitic infections. 90 Oral Capsules, each containing 25mg Ivermectin + 250mg Mebendazole, a clinically effective dose. The Gold Standardof safety and efficacy; the only medication of its kind prescribed by a licensed doctor and compounded by a 50-state licensed pharmacy. Medication You Can Trust from a Trusted Source in the USA The medical experts at The Wellness Company – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Kelly Victory – were leaders in the efforts to provide the public with accurate medical information during COVID. These experts have repeatedly shown that they prioritized the health and welfare of their patients over the bottom line of the big pharmaceutical companies. Now, The Wellness Company is the only company in the world to prescribe pure compounded Ivermectin + Mebendazole from a 50-state licensed pharmacy, in a high-dose 90-day supply. The Wellness Company’s Ivermectin + Mebendazole Parasite Cleanse is in extreme demand, selling out 3 times – prompting The Wellness Company to build a stockpile of medication to serve customers through any potential supply chain disruptions. With the threat of tariffs restricting international trade, many people have turned to shady overseas sources of medication or unlicensed pharmacies. The Wellness Company proudly remains the only legitimate producer of this compounded formula in the US. Head over to The Wellness Company today to order a 90-day supply of the ultimate parasite cleanse – Ivermectin + Mebendazole. Simply fill out the 2-minute intake questionnaire after checkout to complete your prescription request. What people are saying about The Wellness Company’s Ivermectin + Mebendazole: I am grateful to have a medicine as potentially beneficial as ivermectin and mebendazole, but the most important thing for me is the faith I have in Dr. McCullough and The Wellness Company for making a safe product, in our country. I am grateful for them protecting us through the use of proven products and the peace in knowing that I’m taking something that is precisely what it states on the labels. - Jennifer W. My daughter was diagnosed with uterine cancer and lung nodules that turned out to be cancerous. She started taking ivermectin/mebendazole 2 weeks ago. She had a PET scan last month and her lungs were littered with dime and pea sized nodules from the top to the bottom of her lungs. She had a biopsy on the 14th of April and the Physcian had to SEARCH for a nodule big enough to get a sample from, and the ONE that he found was at the bottom of her left lung that he said was only a few centimeters wide…. Thank All of you Doctors on this site for giving us HOPE and HEALING!!! – Helen Click here to see if Ivermectin and Mebendazole from The Wellness Company is right for you. (Note: The information provided is intended for generalized informational purposes only and should not be considered personal medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications. Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links provided, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to keep you SAFE and HEALTY!) What do you think?