In a rare move, the Department of Justice (DOJ) aims to denaturalize a former mayor in Florida after finding out that the Haitian-born man illegally entered the U.S. and fraudulently obtained citizenship.…

Japan’s “Iron Lady” delivered a pointed warning to Beijing on Friday, accusing Communist China of escalating aggression across the Indo-Pacific. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi used her first parliamentary…

A majority of Canadians now view the U.S. as their country’s top security threat — ranking it above China, Russia and Iran — according to a shocking new survey. The poll, conducted for Bloomberg…

[View Article at Source]

The Heckler & Koch HK416 is a short-stroke, external piston assault rifle (yes, that’s a real word) famed for its durability and reliability. First pitched as a replacement for the M4 carbine after it experienced issues when pressed into hard combat, Big Army passed on the HK416 for the improved M4A1. Also Read: This Marine Corps veteran codified the modern handgun shooting techniqueSpecial operations units, however, have more flexible funding. Outfits like Delta Force and DEVGRU adopted the rifle and made use of its over-the-beach capability (the ability to fire immediately after being submerged in water). Outside the U.S., the HK416 has been widely adopted by special operations units worldwide, including the German KSK and KSM. Norway’s military was the first to adopt it as a standard issue rifle in 2007. Surprisingly, France adopted the HK416 in 2017 as its first foreign-made standard-issue rifle. Initially adopted in 2011 as the M27 to replace the M249 SAW, the U.S. Marine Corps started replacing M4s for infantry squads with the HK416 in 2019. Marines use both 16.5-inch and 11-inch barrel M27s. (U.S. Marine Corps) While Heckler & Koch has evolved the HK416 since its introduction, some people may not realize that the rifle has two descendants that were developed to improve on the original. H&K’s primary engineer on the HK416 project, Robert Hirt, later worked for SIG Sauer. Wanting a rifle to compete with the HK416, SIG Sauer tasked Hirt and another engineer, Chris Sirois, with building on HK’s design. The result was the SIG516. Is the SIG 100 better than the HK416? Well, one issue with the original H&K was its forward-venting gas system. To reduce the rifle’s visual signature, the SIG516 used a non-venting gas system. Another problem with the HK416 that H&K loves is its proprietary nature. Replacement parts and accessories need to either come from H&K or be made specifically for the HK416. Instead, the SIG516 utilized more commonly available AR-15 parts in its bolt carrier group. SIG also lowered its top rail (which the HK416 raised to accommodate the external piston gas system) and reduced the rate of fire to improve the rifle’s service life. An Indian soldier takes aim with the new SIG716. (Indian Army) The SIG516 saw limited adoption by military and law enforcement users, though the 7.62x51mm SIG716 was adopted in large numbers by the Indian Army. Hirt and Sirois later designed the SIG MCX, the SPEAR variant of which was adopted by the U.S. Army in 6.8x51mm as the M7 (originally XM5) rifle. SIG has since updated the SIG516 with the G3 variant. But both engineers went on to design one more direct descendant of the HK416. The HK416’s proprietary nature is a potential issue for prospective adopters. The United Arab Emirates was concerned about importing any parts when its military was looking for a new rifle. Rather than be dependent on a foreign country and at the mercy of arms export bans, the UAE opted to set up domestic production of its own rifle. Hiring Hirt, Sirois, and teams of other engineers from around the world, the Emirati manufacturer Caracal set up a design and manufacturing facility in Abu Dhabi to create the CAR 816. With the same external piston gas system and over-the-beach capabilities as the HK416 and SIG516, interested buyers have to ask, “What makes the Caracal 400 better than the H&K?” Korean Coast Guard Sea Special Attack Team armed with Caracal CAR 816s. (Korea Defense Blog via Facebook) To start with, the CAR 816 features the most interchangeability with a standard M4. Small militaries and civilian users can source commercially available replacement parts to keep their CAR 816s operational. The Caracal also uses a tungsten powder buffer to smooth out recoil and reduce bolt carrier bounce, though standard AR buffers still work. While it has seen limited adoption outside the UAE, the CAR 816’s most attractive attribute is its price. On the commercial market, the SIG516 G3 sells for $2,000, and the MR556 A4 (a neutered version of the HK416, because H&K hates you) easily goes for over $3,000. The CAR 816 costs less than $2,000. For civilian shooters who want the engineering and benefits of the HK416 but don’t need the internet clout of the H&K logo, the Caracal CAR 816 and SIG516 offer competitive options with their own benefits over the original. Don’t Miss the Best of We Are The Mighty • The Brits didn’t want this rifle, but you’ll be able to buy it soon• Beretta’s top-tier 1301 is a combat shotgun for the drone age• The legendary FN SCAR is back and (might be) better than before Weapons Weapons The legendary HK416 rifle’s biggest competitors might be its own descendants By Miguel Ortiz Feature The Swedish sledgehammer: A salute to the Carl Gustaf, long may the ‘Goose’ reign By Adam Gramegna Feature Ukraine turned war into a point-based game with a real-world rewards market By Adam Gramegna Military News China is fielding its new anti-ship missile and it’s not just for show By Blake Stilwell Weapons 4 Massively over-hyped Russian weapons systems By Harold C. Hutchison The post The legendary HK416 rifle’s biggest competitors might be its own descendants appeared first on We Are The Mighty.

The true theater of modern conflict isn’t found in the charred husks of Soviet-era tanks that litter Ukrainian landscapes, or the sleek, cold lines of an aircraft carrier barreling through the Persian Gulf; it’s humming inside a small, white, inconspicuous, plastic dish tucked neatly under a camouflage tarp in a Ukrainian foxhole.Also Read: Why traditional jungle warfare training needs an upgrade for 2026 We are living through the first satellite war, an era in which the most lethal weapon on the battlefield isn’t a kinetic projectile but a steady stream of data flowing down from the sky. Starlink, a sprawling constellation of 10,000 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites (with approximately 30 zooming by overhead at any given moment), has become the “digital backbone” for modern resistance. It has also created a terrifying new paradigm of power; a world where a single private citizen can dictate the boundaries of a nation’s defense with little thought and a few lines of code. This is what keeps Russian troops awake at night. (Ukraine Ministry of Defense) To fully appreciate the gravity of this shift, you have to understand that Starlink isn’t just internet. It is a literal satellite swarm flying not too far above your head. While the legacy satellites of the Cold War era sat thousands of miles away in a sluggish, repetitive orbit, the Starlink network sits a mere 340-1200 miles above the dirt under our feet.Closer proximity to Earth reduces the lag time between sending a signal, reflecting off the satellite, and its return (satellites closer to Earth can receive and transmit signals faster than those in higher orbits), providing the precision required to pilot explosive sea drones or coordinate artillery strikes in real time. It is fast, it is portable, and as of 2026, it is the only thing keeping the lights on for command-and-control centers in the world’s most dangerous zip codes. The Great Disconnection For years, the war in Ukraine has been a messy, Frankenstein landscape of old Soviet equipment and new-age tech. A shadow market of connectivity allowed the invading forces to piggyback on American innovation, with thousands of smuggled Starlink terminals appearing in the hands of Russian units who treated them like a quick energy fix for their failing, or non-existent, comms strategies (they were also using Ukraine’s 3G and 4G towers, which succeeded in getting tens of thousands of Russian fighters KIA or wounded).Now, the rules of the game changed, with a ruthlessness that would make a boardroom boss blush.In a massive, coordinated digital purge, SpaceX and the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense activated a nationwide Whitelist Verification System. Consider this less a gradual phase-out and more a digital purgatory. As of today, every terminal operating on Ukrainian soil must be registered and verified through government channels like the Diia portal, or it goes dark. Any unregistered Starlink terminal activated in Ukraine will emit a massive digital spotlight on its exact location.The fallout was instantaneous and devastating. Across the front lines, from the scorched earth of Kupiansk to the occupied south, Russian assaults began to falter as their “unauthorized” terminals suddenly lost their handshake with the satellites. Without the ability to stream real-time drone footage, Russian commanders were left fighting blind, their tactical coordination dissolving into what front-line reports describe as a “catastrophe” for the invaders.There is a tangible human cost to this “God-Switch” that is insufficiently accounted for in a slideshow; it’s found in the chaos of a disconnected battlefield. In one instance, reports from the Zaporizhzhia sector of Ukraine indicated a massive friendly-fire incident had occurred soon after the shutdown went into effect. A Russian assault group of 12 soldiers, severed from their command and invisible to their own observers, was mistakenly engaged and destroyed by their own units.Once the signal dies, the machine will begin to eat itself. SpaceX has also implemented a hard “speed limit” on the network: if a terminal exceeds roughly 90 km/h, the signal cuts out immediately. It is a deliberate design choice that ensures a soldier can use Starlink to call home, but he cannot use it as the brain for a high-speed drone. (Ukraine Ministry of Defense) The Sovereignty Trap This level of control brings us to the “God-Switch” itself, the geofencing capability that allows a private company to decide whether a war starts and ends or goes on ad infinitum. The 2022 Crimea incident remains the original sin of this new era.When Ukraine requested connectivity to launch a sea-drone offensive against the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, the request was denied by one man: Elon Musk. The logic was a corrupted cocktail of caution, confusion, and geopolitics; an irrational fear that a successful strike on the Russian heartland would trigger a nuclear “mini-Pearl Harbor”.The realization that a billionaire’s personal risk assessment could override a nation’s military strategy sent shivers through the Pentagon. Recognizing that this could eventually become a problem, a solution was quickly implemented: Starshield.Starshield is an ultra-secretive $1.8 billion (we think) program designed to build a wall between the consumer product and the war-fighting machine. Starshield is a military-grade swarm, capable of real-time target tracking and secure communications, but with one critical difference: the keys to the “kill switch” are held by the U.S. Space Force, not a civilian board of directors or its majority stakeholder. Without Starlink, Ukraine’s army of drones would be dead in the air. (Ukraine Ministry of Defense) Smuggling Hope into the Dark You are probably asking by now, if Starlink is so obviously flawed, then why, just why? Well, it’s because of how amazing it can actually be for humanity. Consider beyond the battlefields for a moment: Starlink has become the “last tenuous link” for many of those living under the thumb of tyranny and digital isolation.In Iran, the regime has attempted to plunge its 92 million citizens into a total blackout to cover up the “nationwide massacre” of protesters. The Iranian government has deployed military-grade jammers and is actively hunting for the telltale signals of Starlink dishes on residential rooftops. Yet, an estimated 50,000 to 100,000 terminals continued to operate in secret, smuggled across borders to ensure that footage of human rights abuses can still reach the outside world. Unfortunately for Iranian citizens, the Ayatollahs successfully jammed or significantly degraded Starlink signals using those sophisticated radio-frequency jammers.In Venezuela, the story took an even more dramatic turn following the U.S. military operation and the capture of Nicolas Maduro in early January of this year. As the country entered a volatile political transition, Starlink proactively provided “free service credits” to all users through Feb 3, 2026. It was a move that provided a temporary safety net of digital stability during a period of total uncertainty, demonstrating that Starlink can be used altruistically as readily as for “blackmail”. The Humanitarian Burden Viewing Starlink solely through the lens of combat would be doing a disservice. In the aftermath of the massive Tonga volcanic eruption and the devastating earthquakes in Turkey and Syria, the system was often the only thing that worked when ground-based fiber snapped, crackled, and popped before cell towers were trashed.It turns a “comms-dark” disaster zone into a rescue hub in under 10 minutes. For the people of the Amazon or the remote hamlets of the Appalachian Mountains, it isn’t a weapon being wielded by a man; it is an equalizer that brings education and medicine to places the grid simply refused to go.The grunts of old prayed for dry powder; the grunts of the present pray for a clear line of sight, and the people of the world cry out to be heard. Alas, when the world goes dark and the horizon tightens, the ability to flip a switch and pierce the fog of confusion is wonderful.Make no mistake, Pandora’s Box has been opened. We are moving past the era of the “gentlemanly” satellites, those distant, neutral observers of our disputes. In their place stands the God-Switch, a private infrastructure that ignores borders and operates beyond the reach of treaties.Our digital hunger has finally reshaped the map of the world. If you really think about it, we no longer inhabit a collection of nations; we live within signals. And, for better or worse, our future may depend on these signals and on who controls them. Don’t Miss the Best of We Are The Mighty • How the US deleted Venezuela’s air defenses so quickly• The grunt’s 250-year quest for a weapon that actually works• How extremely cold weather can destroy the military’s best-laid plans Feature Feature The God-Switch: What Elon Musk’s Starlink can actually be used for By Adam Gramegna Feature Why the Honor Guard is the best military experience By Dave Grove Feature Dale Dye says ‘decoration inflation’ turns medals into participation trophies By Blake Stilwell Feature No, kids are not getting dumber. Here’s the truth about the Gen Z intelligence study. By Blake Stilwell Feature A new study says veterans are uniquely positioned for AI-resistant careers By Blake Stilwell The post The God-Switch: What Elon Musk’s Starlink can actually be used for appeared first on We Are The Mighty.

In a major ruling on presidential power, the Supreme Court on Friday struck down the sweeping tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed in a series of executive orders. By a vote of 6-3, the justices ruled that the tariffs exceed the powers given to the president by Congress under a 1977 law providing him the authority to regulate commerce during national emergencies created by foreign threats. The court did not weigh in, however, on whether or how the federal government should provide refunds to the importers who have paid the tariffs, estimated in 2025 at more than $200 billion. The law at the center of the case is the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, known as IEEPA, which authorizes the president to use the law “to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States, if the president declares a national emergency with respect to such threat.” A separate provision of the law provides that when there is a national emergency, the president may “regulate … importation or exportation” of “property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest.” The dispute at the center of Friday’s opinion began last year, when Trump issued a series of executive orders imposing the tariffs. Lawsuits filed by small businesses and a group of states, all of which say that they are affected by the increased tariffs, were filed in the lower courts, which agreed with the challengers that IEEPA did not authorize Trump’s tariffs. But those rulings were put on hold, allowing the government to continue to collect the tariffs while the Supreme Court proceedings moved forward. In a splintered decision on Friday, the Supreme Court agreed with the challengers that IEEPA did not give Trump the power to impose the tariffs. “Based on two words separated by 16 others in … IEEPA—‘regulate’ and ‘importation’—the President asserts the independent power to impose tariffs on imports from any country, of any product, at any rate, for any amount of time,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote. “Those words,” he continued, “cannot bear such weight.” “IEEPA,” Roberts added, “contains no reference to tariffs or duties.” Moreover, “until now no President has read IEEPA to confer such power.” In a part of the opinion joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Roberts said that Trump’s reliance on IEEPA to impose the tariffs violated the “major questions” doctrine – the idea that if Congress wants to delegate the power to make decisions of vast economic or political significance, it must do so clearly. “When Congress has delegated its tariff powers,” Roberts said, “it has done so in explicit terms, and subject to strict limits,” a test that Trump’s tariffs failed here. The court’s three Democratic appointees – Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson – joined another part of the Roberts opinion, holding that Trump’s tariffs were also not supported by the text of IEEPA. “The U.S. Code,” Roberts noted, “is replete with statutes granting the Executive the authority to ‘regulate’ someone or something. Yet the Government cannot identify any statute in which the power to regulate includes the power to tax.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the main dissent, which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. In his view, Trump had the authority under IEEPA to impose the tariffs because they “are a traditional and common tool to regulate importation.” Moreover, he suggested, although “I firmly disagree with the Court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a President’s ability to order tariffs going forward … because numerous other federal statutes authorize the President to impose tariffs and might justify most (if not all) of the tariffs at issue in this case.” Kavanaugh also warned that “[i]n the meantime, however, the interim effects of the Court’s decision could be substantial. The United States may be required to refund billions of dollars to importers who paid the IEEPA tariffs, even though some importers may have already passed on costs to consumers or others.” The post Supreme Court strikes down tariffs appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Jon Reddick is a singer and worship leader who is passionate about God, a life that he would not be living today he hadn't turned back...

MIDWINTER BREAK is a British drama about a seemingly contented elderly Irish couple living in Glasgow, Scotland who take a