YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #satire #astronomy #libtards #nightsky #moon #liberals #antifa #blm #liberal #underneaththestars #bigbrother #venus #twilight #charliekirk #regulus
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
2 w

The Genre-Mashing Reality TV Satire Patricia Wants to Cuddle Is Getting a Movie Adaptation
Favicon 
reactormag.com

The Genre-Mashing Reality TV Satire Patricia Wants to Cuddle Is Getting a Movie Adaptation

News Patricia Wants to Cuddle The Genre-Mashing Reality TV Satire Patricia Wants to Cuddle Is Getting a Movie Adaptation It’s not vampires in these Pacific Northwest woods. By Molly Templeton | Published on September 5, 2025 Media: Zando Comment 0 Share New Share Media: Zando “Well, I guess Bigfoot-Lesbian-RomCom-Mystery-Horror is my new favorite genre!” said none other than Lilly Wachowski about Patricia Wants to Cuddle, Samantha Allen’s 2023 novel about the participants in a reality show that gets extra weird when it heads to a remote Pacific Northwest island. It makes a ton of sense that a feature film adaptation of the novel is now in the works; who doesn’t want to watch a queer bigfoot romance that’s also a Bachelor parody? I’d put this on my calendar right now if it had a release date. Sophia Takal (Black Christmas) is set to direct the adaptation; she and Lawrence Michael Levine co-wrote the script. Variety describes the story like so: Patricia Wants to Cuddle follows the final four contestants on a reality TV dating show called The Catch as they arrive on a remote island in the Pacific Northwest, prepared for another week of sleep deprivation, invasive interviews, and salacious drama. Each has her own reason for joining the show, from brand sponsorships to trying to amass followers to even finding love. However, no one is prepared for Patricia, a misunderstood local living alone in the island’s dense woods. When the cast and crew finally encounter her on the island’s highest peak, they realize that survival, not romance, may be the biggest prize. That’s all well and good, but I prefer the way Kayla Kumari Upadhyaya put it at Autostraddle: … Patricia Wants to Cuddle is a lesbian sasquatch horror-comedy Bachelor parody. Plus final girl slasher vibes. Plus a whole gorgeous epistolary lesbian romance subplot. Plus descriptions of the Pacific Northwest night sky and landscape so simultaneously lovely and haunting you will be torn by wanting to look closer and wanting to look away, which is fitting, because that’s exactly how I feel when watching the best episodes of reality television. In a statement, Takal said, “Patricia Wants to Cuddle offers a unique opportunity to explore the tension between our civilized personas and our wilder, more authentic selves through a horror lens.” I can’t wait to see which actors get to meet Patricia.[end-mark] The post The Genre-Mashing Reality TV Satire <i>Patricia Wants to Cuddle</i> Is Getting a Movie Adaptation appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
2 w

Wilson Cruz Is (Jokingly) Upset That Star Trek: Discovery Didn’t Get a Musical Episode
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Wilson Cruz Is (Jokingly) Upset That Star Trek: Discovery Didn’t Get a Musical Episode

News Star Trek: Discovery Wilson Cruz Is (Jokingly) Upset That Star Trek: Discovery Didn’t Get a Musical Episode “I love them, but I was so enraged by that…” (Remember, he’s joking people.) By Vanessa Armstrong | Published on September 5, 2025 Credit: CBS / Paramount+ Comment 0 Share New Share Credit: CBS / Paramount+ Star Trek: Strange New Worlds’ “Subspace Rhapsody” broke ground as the first musical episode in Star Trek history. Strange New Worlds, however, was far from the first Star Trek series to try it. We know that showrunner Michael Chabon tried to make one happen for Picard, and even called up Lin-Manuel Miranda to try to make that happen. (It didn’t, thank the stars.) Ronald D. Moore also reportedly pitched one for Deep Space Nine and failed. And at this year’s STLV: Trek to Vegas convention, Star Trek: Discovery star Wilson Cruz confirmed that his show had considered a musical installment as well. During a panel with Cruz and his co-star (and former Rent performer) Anthony Rapp, Cruz (via TrekMovie) shared the following about his musical episode dreams being dashed: Season one, we’re sitting there with Aaron Harberts and Gretchen Berg and Alex Kurtzman and Akiva [Goldsman]. And someone says, “Well, what do you guys think about having a musical episode?” And we’re like, “Of course! That would be amazing.” So for the whole season, we’re like, “Next season, it is going to happen, right?” Didn’t happen season two. We’re like, “Okay. season three, right?” Nope. Was it during season four? It was either—season four was shooting [or] season four, after we had aired, and they announced this, and I… [long pause] I love them, but I was so enraged by that, and they did a fine job. It was fun. But I was mad. I don’t work for them anymore, so I can say it. It’s a shame Star Trek: Discovery didn’t get its chance to sing during its five-season run. We at least have these Carpool Karaoke clips of Rapp, Soniqua Martin-Green, Mary Wiseman, and Doug Jones singing, which lets us imagine what could have been. [end-mark] The post Wilson Cruz Is (Jokingly) Upset That <i>Star Trek: Discovery</i> Didn’t Get a Musical Episode appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
2 w

Biden Admin Targeted Christians with IRS Referrals, Public Shaming, Prosecutions 
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Biden Admin Targeted Christians with IRS Referrals, Public Shaming, Prosecutions 

A Trump administration task force says it’s found “numerous instances of anti-Christian bias during the Biden administration,” from public shaming to threats of criminal charges to IRS referrals.  An initial report from the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias says the Biden administration engaged in “disfavored treatment and viewpoint discrimination,” “harassment,” “weaponized prosecutions,” and other biased behavior toward Christians.  The report points to government-wide examples of this anti-Christian bias, including a finding that the Biden administration allowed a hospital to “violate employee conscience rights” by forcing “staff to participate in abortions against their consciences.”  The report, dated June 6, was obtained by Fox News Digital Friday.?  Following instructions from Attorney General Pam Bondi, the report incorporates detailed assessments from government agencies describing their findings of bias and steps taken—or planned—to counter that bias.  Other findings include a report from the State Department that the agency “stigmatized employees for religious objections to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate,” requiring them to turn over highly personal information and then publicly shaming and humiliating them.  The State Department also found that under Biden, the agency “targeted Christian homeschool parents who were federal employees with inspector general investigations, IRS referrals, and threats of criminal charges and disciplinary action.”  While investigations remain in their early stages, the report says, “The evidence uncovered is unmistakable: during the Biden administration, people of faith, particularly Christians, were repeatedly subjected to anti-religious bias at the hands of their own government.”  “Attorney General Bondi and the task force are resolved to end that pattern once and for all,” the report concludes. “The task force will never permit the federal government to be used as a weapon against faith.”  The task force says it plans to “deliver a detailed report with findings and recommendations by February 2026.”  The post Biden Admin Targeted Christians with IRS Referrals, Public Shaming, Prosecutions  appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
2 w

Chicago Crime Victim Says Dem Leaders Are Doing ‘Disservice’ by Not Working With Trump to Fight Criminals
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Chicago Crime Victim Says Dem Leaders Are Doing ‘Disservice’ by Not Working With Trump to Fight Criminals

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION—Kathleen Miles, a woman who got assaulted in downtown Chicago, said on Friday that Democrat Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Democrat Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson are doing a “disservice” by not working with President Donald Trump to fight crime. A man with a lengthy criminal record randomly punched Miles in the face as she was walking toward Union Station on Aug. 19, leaving her with several broken bones, a black eye and a concussion, according to Chicago-based ABC 7 Eyewitness News. She stated on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” that Pritzker and Johnson’s refusal to bring in federal assistance in Chicago is only hurting law-abiding people. “I would like to see help,” Miles said. “As a mom, when there’s an issue that I can’t tackle alone or a problem that seems to be escalating, I have [in] my entire life [sought] out help to rectify that problem to get assistance and to move forward. And I think it’s a disservice to all of us citizens of this state and of this city to not accept the help to minimize the problem and come up with a solution.” WATCH:  Police identified the suspect as 32-year-old William Livingston, who has 13 mug shots dating back to 2012, according to ABC 7 Eyewitness News. A large number of those arrests were for aggravated assault and battery of women and police officers. In 2017, Livingston faced charges for randomly attacking two women in separate instances, though both of the cases were dropped, ABC 7 Eyewitness News reported. He was later sentenced to five years in prison in 2022 for the assault and attempted robbery of four women within 20 minutes. He was released on July 26, 2023. Pritzker and Johnson have insisted that crime has gone down in Chicago and have pleaded with Trump to not deploy the National Guard. The Illinois governor said that they will “immediately go to court” if Trump’s administration follows through with sending National Guard troops to Chicago. In 2025, a total of 278 homicides occurred in Chicago as of Aug. 31, according to The Chicago Tribune. At least seven were slain in the 54 shootings that happened in the city over Labor Day weekend. The number of homicides in Chicago reached a 25-year high in 2021, and have remained significantly higher than the numbers recorded in the last decade, The Chicago Tribune reported. Aside from June 2014, no other single month of June has had fewer than 40 murders in Chicago since at least 1970, according to WTTW, a PBS affiliate. In response to the Labor Day weekend shootings, Pritzker told NBC 5 Chicago on Monday that the focus should be on Trump attempting to “target” Chicago. Johnson also dismissed the idea of increasing police presence in the city during an Aug. 26 appearance on “Morning Joe,” instead saying that Chicago needs more “affordable housing” and mental health services to reduce crime. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post Chicago Crime Victim Says Dem Leaders Are Doing ‘Disservice’ by Not Working With Trump to Fight Criminals appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
2 w

The Right’s Divide Over Israel Is an Age Gap
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

The Right’s Divide Over Israel Is an Age Gap

“I’m not really sure that comity is going to be found here,” Curt Mills, the executive director of The American Conservative, told The Daily Signal leading up to this year’s National Conservatism Conference. It proved to be an understatement. “These tensions are just out in the open, and they deserve to be addressed to the conference,” Mills added. To Yoram Hazony and the NatCon organizers’ great credit given the sensitivity of the topic, open and addressed they were. Tuesday’s breakout session debate that pitted the Israel skeptic Mills against the supportive Max Abrahms, an associate professor at Northeastern University, was a major flashpoint. Labeling those who expressed concerns about a wider Middle East war and U.S. engagement in the theater in June “MAGA isolationist realists,” Abrahms argued this group is just as wrong about the Middle East as the neoconservatives. “It’s probably the most inaccurate Mideast punditry that you can find anywhere,” Abrahms said of the “MAGA isolationist realists.” For Mills’ part, what transpired in June—much less the last thirty-plus years of American foreign policy—is “perhaps the world’s historic case of the tail-wagging dog.” “Why are these our wars? Why are Israel’s endless problems America’s liabilities? Why are we in the national conservative bloc, broadly speaking, why do we laugh out of the room this argument when it’s advanced by Volodymyr Zelenskyy but are slavish hypocrites for Benjamin Netanyahu? Why should we accept America First—asterisk Israel?” Mills asked rhetorically. “And the answer is, we shouldn’t.” The conversation, moderated by Dan McCarthy of Modern Age, was a clash of ideas. It was also a clash of styles, with Abrahms often sliding into the theoretical, academic aspects and the newsman Mills focusing on the practical realities. But perhaps more interesting than Mills and Abrahms’ difference in style and philosophy is their difference in age. Mills is a millennial, while Abrahms is of Generation X. On the American Right, age is quickly becoming the greatest predictor of someone’s views on Israel. The audience question and answer portion of the debate reflected this, as well. Every question fielded by audience members who appeared under 50 was pointedly skeptical of Israel, while questions from audience members over 50 signaled their support for the Jewish state.  A recent Pew Research study suggests this phenomenon is widespread. Among Republicans, those over 50 years old have an overwhelmingly positive view of Israel, while those under 50 are split down the middle. The degree of separation between Republicans under and over 50 regarding Israel is not necessarily a new phenomenon. When Pew Research asked the same question in a March 2022 study, it found that only 19% of Republicans over 50 had a negative view of Israel, while 35% of those under 50 had a negative view of Israel. Over the course of the war that began on October 7, however, under-50 Republicans’ view of Israel have shifted 15 points. Fifty percent of Republicans under 50 had a negative view of Israel, according to the March 2025 findings. Over that same period, over-50 Republicans’ view moved just 4 points in the same direction, with 23% having a negative view of the Jewish state. While attempts to explain the motivations for this shift are limited to the realm of conjecture, the timing of the two surveys—March 2022 and March 2025—suggests that Israel’s conduct in the course of the ongoing Middle East war is likely the source of their consternation. On the whole, these younger Republicans are not molding into Mahmoud Khalil or Hamas sympathizers. They’re not mini-Mahmoud Ahmadinejads or Holocaust deniers. An April 2024 study, also from Pew Research, helps substantiate this claim. A plurality of Americans under 50 surveyed said the reason for Israel’s war with Hamas was “valid.” A plurality of that same demographic group, however—at the time less than a year into the hostilities—said the way in which Israel was carrying out its response was “unacceptable.” When Pew conducted its survey in March 2025—before U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities—a majority of Republicans (51%) believed Trump was striking the right balance in the Middle East conflict. At that time, Trump was taking a hard line with Hamas by demanding the release of all hostages and warning terrorist and militia groups in the region against potential strikes on American targets. Simultaneously, the administration reiterated it would not commit to boots on the ground for any post-war Gaza arrangement.  The views of younger Republicans, however, changed in the wake of the U.S. strikes on Iran in June. Only 20% of Republicans under the age of 45, according to a CNN poll in June, strongly approved of Trump’s Iran strikes, as opposed to a majority (53%) of over-45 Republicans who strongly approved. These younger Republicans, the CNN poll found, are also 26 points less likely to trust Trump’s Iran decisionmaking a “great deal” and 20 points more likely to believe the strikes will ultimately increase the Iranian threat. The question the Right’s generational divide on Israel raises, however, is whether or not the victory over neoconservatism has been Pyrrhic. While Abrahms repeatedly rejected neoconservatism, Mills asked if there was one neoconservative that disapproved of the B-2 strikes in June, to which Abrahms was unable to provide an example. Nor was Abrahms quick to point out a substantive difference between his views on June’s strikes and the views of the neoconservatives. That answer did not satisfy Mills. Nor is it likely to satisfy young conservatives who have grown up in a world formed by the heavy-handed influence of neoconservatism. They are dyed-in-the-wool anti-neocons. They are all too familiar with the empty promises of neoconservatism. Neoconservatism promised its wars would be a boon to the American economy and the American worker, but, when all is said and done, their misadventures will likely cost the American people $10 trillion. Neoconservatism promised to vanquish the threat of terrorism from abroad, but the result has been more of it at home. Above all, neoconservatism promised that exercising America’s military might would lead to a domino-effect for democracy across the world. The opposite has occurred. To be clear, you don’t have to be a neocon to support Israel—look no further than NatCon founder himself, Hazony. Even so, the apparent alignment between the Republican Party’s center-right hawks and the neocons that remain on Iran simply leaves one to wonder if neoconservatism has actually been excised from the conservative movement, or if Trump and the disasters of the last 30 years of American foreign policy have simply made the brand too toxic to embrace openly. If it’s the latter, the realists’ victory over neoconservatism will be a mirage until the generational shift within the conservative movement naturally turns over. The post The Right’s Divide Over Israel Is an Age Gap appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
2 w

Yikes! Qatar Makes Universities Sign Agreement That Prevent Criticizing Country
Favicon 
hotair.com

Yikes! Qatar Makes Universities Sign Agreement That Prevent Criticizing Country

Yikes! Qatar Makes Universities Sign Agreement That Prevent Criticizing Country
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 w

Jake Tapper Suggests Trump Will Turn Troops on America, Steal Election
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Jake Tapper Suggests Trump Will Turn Troops on America, Steal Election

CNN’s The Lead hosted some very dangerous and incendiary rhetoric from anchor Jake Tapper during Thursday’s episode as he promoted Democratic Party conspiracy theories that President Trump was going to turn the National Guard on Americas. According to two different segments Tapper presented to his audience, Trump was going to steal the midterm elections, and he found it suspicious troops were being sent to American cities at the same Trump was renaming the Department of Defense back to Department of War. Earlier in the week, Tapper had described online claims that Trump was dead as “bizarre conspiracy theories.” But that firm condemnation was nowhere to be found when he highlighted and thus promoted Democratic Party claims Trump was going to steal the midterm elections using the National Guard: TAPPER: And Terry, some Democrats, such as Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, have suggested this isn't about fighting crime itself. Take a listen to what he told CBS Face the Nation. (Cuts to video) PRITZKER: He'd like to stop the elections in 2026 or frankly take control of those elections. He'll just claim that there's some problem with an election and then he's got troops on the ground that can take control if in fact he's allowed to do this. (Cuts back to live) TAPPER: And the governor of California, Gavin Newsom has said similar things.     Tapper was speaking to disgraced former ABC reporter Terry Moran, who recalled a recent interview he did California Attorney General Rob Bonta. “Well, he's filing a lawsuit to stop the extension of the original 300 National Guard troop presence in Los Angeles past Election Day because he's suspicious, because there's a shadow in all of this,” Moran proclaimed. Moran added to the far-left conspiracy theory by suggesting the deployments to help crack down on crime were “to prime the American people to see military forces on the streets of our cities when there is no justification … And that's clearly what this is.” In the second hour of The Lead, Tapper did a segment about Trump getting set to sign an executive order reverting the name of the Department of Defense back to the Department of War. The CNN “journalist” found the timing suspect given the National Guard deployments. “It's interesting that this comes as all these National Guard troops are being deployed to major cities, having nothing to do with war, theoretically,” he said, obviously hinting at something nefarious. “Right. No. We have an active military now, and they're landing in American cities,” agreed CNN commentator and former Obama flack David Axelrod. Suggesting to the public that the National Guard troops they see are primed to steal their elections and launch a war against the American people was extremely dangerous rhetoric. If yet another far-left lunatic heard CNN’s hyperbolic reporting, it could lead to even more attempts to kill Trump, Republicans, and maybe even the troops. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: CNN’s The Lead September 4, 2025 5:48:35 p.m. Eastern (…) JAKE TAPPER: And Terry, some Democrats, such as Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, have suggested this isn't about fighting crime itself. Take a listen to what he told CBS Face the Nation. (Cuts to video) GOV. J.B. PRITZKER (D-IL): He'd like to stop the elections in 2026 or frankly take control of those elections. He'll just claim that there's some problem with an election and then he's got troops on the ground that can take control if in fact he's allowed to do this. (Cuts back to live) TAPPER: And the governor of California, Gavin Newsom has said similar things. You just spoke to the attorney general of California. What do they -- what -- what does -- what does he think? TERRY MORAN: Well, he's filing a lawsuit to stop the extension of the original 300 National Guard troop presence in Los Angeles past Election Day because he's suspicious, because there's a shadow in all of this, whether it's for the screens. It is also to prime the American people to see military forces on the streets of our cities when there is no justification. There's no disaster. There's no riot burning down square miles of any city. There was one car on fire in Los Angeles. And that's clearly what this is. Trump wanted to send the military. He talked about it in 2020. In December of 2020, he said we could have the military hold elections in the -- in the swing states. He's talked about it here. He says, I'm the President. They get to do what I want. And they're already talking about the emergency around the voting machines. ASHLEY ETIENNE: And let's not forget, this is also about what -- what expansion of the authority of the presidency. This is what Steve Bannon and Steve Miller said that the purpose of this next administration is. And that's what we're seeing play out on the streets of American cities. (…) 6:46:34 p.m. Eastern TAPPER: It's interesting that this comes as all these National Guard troops are being deployed to major cities, having nothing to do with war, theoretically. DAVID AXELROD: Right. No. We have an active military now, and they're landing in American cities. (…)
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 w

Misogyny? Please: Our real problem is female entitlement
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Misogyny? Please: Our real problem is female entitlement

With sensitive subjects, I believe it’s best to be direct, so let’s rip the Band-Aid off: This article is about female narcissism.It’s not about men’s faults; those are catalogued and exaggerated around the clock, every day of the year. This piece is about a truth that many people know, and have noticed, but that almost no one will dare say. I spent decades being the 'gay best friend' in platonic female friendships. Men like me know things about women that many other men don’t.Since the rise of feminism in the 1960s, American women have entered the workforce in unprecedented numbers, overtaken men in college matriculation (58%), and become the vast numerical majority in every industry related to childcare and instruction.But a strange and contradictory thing has happened along the way. The more "equality" American women have gained, the more solipsistic, entitled, self-focused, and immature they've become. Exiles in gyno-villeWe are told that women have it worse than ever and that the average man is a misogynist. Not a “sexist.” Not even a “male chauvinist pig,” as the ladies in "9 to 5" would have called such men in the days of “women’s lib.” Nay. Men are now misogynists, a word that means roiling hatred for women because they’re women. It is a term that, until the past 15 years, was only used to describe the most depraved men, psycho-sexual serial killers such as Richard Ramirez (the “night stalker”) or Ed Gein (“the butcher of Plainfield”).Now, it’s glibly tossed off by self-confident but dissatisfied women toward men who don’t symbolically kneel and kiss their Manolo Blahnik shoes. Men don’t want a second date with a woman? Misogynist. Male colleagues complain about women in HR censoring their conversations and managing their tone and terminology? Misogyny. Women with part-time jobs, or women who take time off to nurture their newborns, complain hilariously about the “gender pay gap.” They claim falsely that women are paid less for the exact same work with the exact same years of service. It’s not true. Not even a little bit.But if you point that fact out? You guessed it: misogynist.Hag-iographyI’m in an interesting position when it comes to commenting on the never-ending war of the sexes, a war that is being waged mainly by women against men. We men didn’t ask for these hostilities. As a 50-year-old gay man, I spent the majority of my adult life as a leftist liberal before I matured and found grown-up conservatism. This meant I spent decades being the “gay best friend” in platonic female friendships. Men like me know things about women that many other men don’t.When I was enacting an everyday version of Jack and Karen on "Will and Grace," I was the toast of female society. But when I began to notice the entitlement, the diva-like behavior, and the “give me stuff for free and expect nothing in return” attitude of many modern women, I was thrown to the curb. Former friends called me — wait for it — a misogynist. And not just a misogynist but an especially virulent one. “Gay men are the most misogynistic men on the planet,” such women say in between sips of mimosas and texts to their gay BFF about what color they should ask for at the nail salon. Some even speculated that my “anger at women” foretold a future career as a spree killer (I wish I were joking).The fog of feminismWe’re not experiencing an epidemic of male misogyny. We’ve been living in a gynocracy for decades, and we’re saddled with a bumper crop of women who have never been told “no.” They’ve never been denied a participation trophy or a promotion to HR manager. They’ve never been told they’re not a “10.” They’re not even expected to say “thank you” when a gentleman holds a door for a lady.Some readers think I exaggerate. They’re constructing an image of me as a “bitter” or “frustrated” man. This is where the modern female mind (and the minds of too many feckless, gelded men) go when women are held to the same standards of deportment and adult behavior that men are expected to maintain. It’s a fish-who-doesn’t-know-what-water-is problem. Since the flower power era, feminism has been the oxygen that all Americans, liberal and conservative, breathe. We think outsized female self-regard and entitlement is normal, but it’s not. It’s recent, and it’s at the root of huge societal problems, “wokeness” being the biggest.Dumping on menLet me give you an example from the real world. This will indeed seem like “no big deal” to many readers, and it’s true that it’s a mild incident. But consider whether you would react that way if the sexes were reversed. I went to the city dump to unload a car full of branches and lawn trimmings. As I hauled the leaves over to the pile, two late-middle-aged women in twin-set sweaters and pearls were doing the same about five feet from me.One said to the other, knowing full well that I was standing there, “Where are the men? Why should we have to do this? Do they do anything?” They both gave a soft, suburban chuckle. Her friend responded, “At least when women are around we know work will get done.”Were I to respond to those women the way they would have responded to me in the reverse, I would have shrieked, “Misandrist!” and run home to tell my wife how unsafe I felt at the town grass tip. The point is, it would not even occur to most men to be so gauche about women in mixed company. Not only are most men not inclined to give women social offense that way, they know damned well they’d be punished if they did.RELATED: How leftists think — and how you can change their minds NurPhoto/Getty ImagesExpired tartsThis brings me to, of all people, Taylor Swift. The biggest pop star in the world became a household name by singing forgettable songs about inadequate men and the trauma of a teenager’s dating life. Thing is, she’s still singing about this stuff at age 35. And her concerts are packed not just with teen girls, but with suburban moms well into their 50s, crying the way adolescent girls did in the early '60s when the Beatles first washed ashore.This is not normal. This infantilized girlboss pose by mothers and career women has no historical precedent. For all the talk of shiftless, video-gaming boys and young men, we spill precious little ink on the fact that adult women think nothing of dressing like 16-year-old tarts and waxing about how they’re in their “soft girl era.”It’s undignified and so is the direction Miss Swift is taking with the publicity for her new album. Take a look at the photo she released on social media.It’s too generous to call that garment a teddy; it’s closer to a gownless evening strap (pacé Shirley Bassey). Her rump is exposed, and she’s bending over to stick out her backside while leaning against what looks like a truck stop bathroom wall. Even the lighting looks like grimy gay male pornography from the 1970s.Aging like milkWhat does this have to do with the state of ordinary, everyday, non-Taylor Swift women? A lot. Miss Swift is doing on stage what millions of workaday women are doing on the street. She is refusing to age gracefully, and she’s getting raunchier as time goes on. This has been a pattern with women for the past 15 years, as mothers don’t want to be seen as mothers but as the older, more ... experienced version of their nubile daughters.This is the friction point where we can see that modern female narcissism is an expression of extreme insecurity in women. These ladies have a terribly sad belief that the only thing of value they have to offer is sex. And no, it’s not the "male gaze” or “male producers” who are at fault. Taylor Swift — and Linda Smith down the street — are doing this to themselves.Women call it the “invisibility” problem. On leaving youth and entering middle age, they say, men stop looking at them as desirable. This is a double-edged sword for most women. Many express relief at not having their breasts and backside ogled (men are cads; women aren’t making that up), but at the same time, they complain bitterly about no longer being perceived as sex objects.Lust for life?They blame this on “patriarchal” male tastes, but that’s just feminist cope. If fault there be, it is the fault of nature, not social constructs. Women lose their sexual appeal after youth in a way that men, largely, do not. This is a fact. No, it's not a fun or favorite fact. But it is a fact. Women seem to believe they are entitled to be lusted after and desired at 45, 55, 65, the way a fresh-faced college girl turns men’s heads. It’s ridiculous. Look at Madonna (67), Cher (79), or Jennifer Lopez (56). That’s the road Taylor Swift is on, and mind-bogglingly, it’s the road way too many normal women seem determined to travel. Kavin Mazur/Taylor Hill/Xavi Torrent/Getty ImagesThe problem these women are facing, I believe, stems from the fact that so many have stayed adolescent girls their whole lives instead of learning from the example of their grandmothers. There is an arc to a woman's life. Some have called it Maiden, Mother, Crone. If you don't like that, label it some way you find pleasing.Grande dames wantedThere is a role for middle-aged and old women, at least there always used to be. It was upheld in almost all societies before the mid-20th century. Even the actresses of old Hollywood, beauty queens in youth like Joan Crawford, assumed this role as they aged. Our grandmothers assumed this role.It is the role of the grande dame. It is the carriage of a mature, put-together, self-confident, and wise woman. A true matriarch. Hair goes up, and hems go down.Youthful beauty and sex appeal are natural to the young part of a woman’s life; this tracks with evolutionarily programmed facts of reproduction. When one is past one’s reproductive prime, life offers new roles to men and women.But not in the 2020s. But it doesn’t have to be this way for women. Dignity is available to those who will step into it.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 w

The real RFK threat
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

The real RFK threat

The United States Senate isn’t happy with Bobby Kennedy Jr. Senators say he's a grievous threat to the health and safety of Americans and that everything was fine before he came to town.These Republican and Democrat senators would rather see nothing change. They know the country gets sicker and fatter every day, but they don't want people fired over that. That attitude almost makes sense. Responsibility and accountability are rare birds in these parts, and most of these people have been in their offices for decades while our national downward slide continues uninterrupted.The same politicians who have held office for decades while autism rates exploded and Americans got fatter and sicker were angry.But what scares them most about RFK Jr. isn't what he’s doing; it’s what he’s saying. For decades, the scientific bureaucracy relied on unquestioning trust and obedience. That’s over now, and the moneyed interests that long ago captured this section of government and its congressional supervisors are terrified of this reality.What’s more, this moment cannot be undone. Broken trust is tough to repair even between people as close as husband and wife. But government and citizens, or companies and consumers? That might as well be impossible.This is the reality facing the American scientific establishment today, regardless of whether the politicians can bring themselves to admit it. COVID-19 shattered the public’s trust in everything from the medical establishment to the education system like Vietnam and Watergate shattered the basic assumptions decades prior — and there’s no going back.The next administration can undo much of the excellent work this White House has accomplished on border enforcement, drug interdiction, trade policies, foreign entanglements, etc. — but Democrats cannot undo a population that is now questioning their “recommendations.” Too many of them simply don’t survive scrutiny.When our daughter was born last year, my wife and I had a book on the research, benefits, negatives, and potential consequences behind each and every vaccine “recommendation.” Our baby needs the hepatitis B shot when she’s one day old, even though her mother, like all pregnant women in America, was tested for it and it's a disease confined to prostitutes and intravenous drug addicts?That’s what “the science” says, they responded, and “there’s a lot of misinformation out there.” No, thank you, Doctor, what else do you have for her?That just was not the case when my son was born nine years ago. My wife tacitly trusted that the doctors had his best interests in mind. Why wouldn’t they? Back then, we thought most vaccine skeptics were strange celebrities and homeschool families.We’re never going back to that passive acceptance, and every few weeks I get a message from a newly expectant father or mother asking for advice on navigating the pediatric offices, which largely insist that you follow the Centers for Disease Control “recommendations” or be ejected from their care. For them, it’s a matter of dogma.Families around the country watched while playgrounds and beaches were closed, elderly couples died alone in separate rooms of the same hospital to “protect them from COVID,” and dads were barred from their wives’ sides during labor.We saw that strip clubs, casinos, and mass protests were called safe places to gather, but churches were shut down.We listened to the transgender “science.”We heard the ever-changing mask policies, and if we didn’t personally suffer from it, we knew at least one young person whose heart was hurt by the untested COVID vaccines.And we woke up. Kennedy is giving voice to these people. Just as he said in his opening statement to the Senate on Thursday: “We were lied to about everything.”Senators didn’t want to hear that. The same politicians who have held office for decades while autism rates exploded and Americans got fatter and sicker were angry. Funny; the American people are angry too. Our trust is broken, and the only way back is through the truth. That will require confrontation. It’s going to make powerful people who aren’t used to being challenged very uncomfortable. There’s a lot of money in lying about this stuff.We know we were lied to about everything. We’re wide awake now, and we’re not going back to sleep.Blaze News: RFK Jr. laughs at Elizabeth Warren’s concern-mongering: 'You're just making stuff up'Sign up for Bedford’s newsletterSign up to get Blaze Media senior politics editor Christopher Bedford’s newsletter.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
2 w

National Archives has bad news for some of the crooks who received clemency in Biden's name
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

National Archives has bad news for some of the crooks who received clemency in Biden's name

President Donald Trump declared on March 17 that "the 'Pardons' that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen.""In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them!" the president continued. "The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden. He knew nothing about them, and the people that did may have committed a crime."Liberal fact-checkers rushed to suggest the president was wrong about the Biden pardons — however, a great deal of evidence has come out vindicating Trump's understanding that the pardons were likely unlawful.'I made the decisions during my presidency.'Two weeks after the Oversight Project obtained internal emails from the Justice Department indicating that there was a high-level understanding in the Biden administration that many of the commutations autopenned in the former president's name were legally flawed, Just the News received internal Biden White House memos that could similarly spell trouble for recipients.Mike Howell — president of the Oversight Project, which first exposed the Biden White House's prolific use of the autopen earlier this year — told Blaze News, "We've been right all along, and it's nice to be right again. It's past time to start actually charging these people."The memos, gathered as part of a Trump White House Counsel probe into Biden's use of autopen signatures for official business, shed additional light on the Biden White House's shifting approach to pardons and the former president's involvement in the process.RELATED: 'WTF are you guys doing?' DOJ exposes 'black and white evidence' that Biden admin knew autopenned pardons were legally flawed Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images A February 2021 draft memo from then-White House staff secretary Jessica Hertz — a final version of which was reportedly not referenced in the National Archives — detailed guidelines for Biden's autopen use "based on precedent from the Obama-Biden administration." The memo, which was sent early in the Democratic administration to Biden insiders, including then-chief of staff Ron Klain, noted that congressional bills, veto messages, and pardon letters were among the documents the president should personally approve and hand-sign.It is clear from the liberal use of autopen signatures on pardons and other consequential presidential actions by the Biden White House that this guidance did not stick.While Biden told news outlets in June, "I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations," a draft memo circulated by Biden's White House Counsel in February 2024 suggested otherwise.The 2024 draft memo detailed the "general pattern" followed by members of the White House Counsel's Office clemency team when securing approval for clemency, revealing that Biden "previously asked the White House Counsel to discuss the [clemency] candidates with him, although in the last round the vice president’s approval was sufficient to obtain his approval."RELATED: Biden freed killers with a pen he didn’t even hold Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty ImagesThe Trump White House reportedly concluded that this particular memo indicates that Biden was "outsourcing" clemency decisions to Kamala Harris in 2024.The Trump WHCO's probe also found very little evidence to suggest Biden actually attended four critical clemency meetings in December 2024 and January 2025 and "turned up no record of the president’s briefing books addressing pardons, commutations, or clemency at that time," Just the News reported.The National Archives apparently has no contemporaneous staff notes confirming Biden was present at the Dec. 5, Dec. 11, Jan. 11, and Jan. 19 meetings where he was later said to have supposedly given "verbal approval" for commutations for federal death row inmates, members of the Biden family, and other unsavory characters. The Trump White House also found a troubling indication in its review that Biden may have not been sufficiently involved in the controversial commutation of sentences for 37 federal inmates sitting on death row.In a Dec. 10, 2024, draft memo, then-White House counsel Edward Siskel recommended that Biden grant clemency for the felons; however, the National Archives reportedly proved unable to find a final version of the memo bearing proof of Biden's approval for the commutations that were ultimately granted in his name.Just the News indicated that the office of Joe and Jill Biden did not respond to a request for comment."In June 2022, the Biden White House began deploying the autopen to sign clemency warrants and executive orders in July of 2022. Autopen use skyrocketed from there," former Idaho Solicitor General Theodore Wold, a board member of the Oversight Project, told the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary in June. "We found that of the 51 clemency warrants issued during the Biden presidency, over half — 32 in total — were signed with an autopen."Wold later emphasized that the "president actually has to make the decision — that cannot be delegated to a staffer or an adviser," but there was no indication "that anyone other than staff were making these decisions." — (@) Editor's note: Mike Howell is a contributor to Blaze News.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 2054 out of 91496
  • 2050
  • 2051
  • 2052
  • 2053
  • 2054
  • 2055
  • 2056
  • 2057
  • 2058
  • 2059
  • 2060
  • 2061
  • 2062
  • 2063
  • 2064
  • 2065
  • 2066
  • 2067
  • 2068
  • 2069
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund