YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #humor #nightsky #loonylibs #moon #charliekirk #supermoon #perigee #illegalaliens #zenith #tpusa #bigfoot #socialists #spooky #supermoon2025
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
2 w

CNN Reminds Amy Klobuchar That Trump’s Asia Trip Isn’t Exactly A Getaway
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

CNN Reminds Amy Klobuchar That Trump’s Asia Trip Isn’t Exactly A Getaway

'It's not just like a vacation'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
2 w

Supreme Court’s ‘Trump Term’ Could End Up Reshaping Executive Power
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Supreme Court’s ‘Trump Term’ Could End Up Reshaping Executive Power

Historic
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
2 w

Tuesday's Final Word
Favicon 
hotair.com

Tuesday's Final Word

Tuesday's Final Word
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 w

CNN's Cornish Strategizes With Portland Democrat: Any Reason Not To Use Violence?
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

CNN's Cornish Strategizes With Portland Democrat: Any Reason Not To Use Violence?

In Audie Cornish's mind, there's nothing inherently wrong with violent Democrat protests. It's just that violence might be the wrong strategic choice for the Democrats. That's the takeaway from the exchange CNN This Morning host Cornish had today with Janelle Bynum, a Democrat Representative whose district includes a portion of Portland, Oregon. The topic was President Trump's plan to send National Guard troops to the area. At one point, Bynum said: "One thing to remember is that when you talk about why people are protesting and why things may get violent, what you have to understand is, you need to address the grievances. And that's what the Trump administration is not doing." So, if the Trump administration doesn't cave to the radicals' demands, violence is understandable? Bynum added, "The president knows that he's messing with Portland, Oregon, and he's messing with the wrong people." Sounds vaguely threatening.  You might have expected Cornish to push back. But to the contrary, she responded: "Is there any argument for Democrats to say nonviolent protests in particular might be the better approach here? Are there ways that you're, in a sense, baiting or being drawn into this argument by the White House? " Sounds like, for Cornish, there's nothing inherently wrong about Democrat violence. To the contrary, Audie wonders if there could be ANY argument against violence. And the only thing she comes up with is that it might play into President Trump's hands. In an unusual turn of phrase, Bynum repeatedly demanded that Trump "run us our money," apparently meaning, pay out funds to which she believes her area is entitled. She claimed that Trump is using the protests as a pretext to not "run us our money." Note: Cornish musing with Bynum as to whether violence or non-violence would work better for the Dems reminds me of an old Jewish joke [invoking Finkelstein-ian privilege.]  After years of living in the US, the little old Jewish lady qualifies to become an American citizen. The only thing remaining is an interview with the judge. He looks down at her from the bench, and formally asks, "And do you advocate the overthrow of the government of the United States by force, or by violence?" The little old lady is frazzled, and, imagining that the judge has posed a multiple-choice question, timorously replies, "um, violence?"  Here's the transcript. CNN This Morning  10/20/25 6:33 am EDT AUDIE CORNISH: The deployment of National Guard troops to Portland is one step closer to happening. In a two-to-one decision Monday, the Ninth Circuit of Appeals sided with the Trump administration. They found even if the president exaggerates Portland as war ravaged on social media, quote, this does not change that other facts provide a colorable basis to support the administration's argument.  Joining me now to discuss, Congresswoman Janelle Bynum of Oregon. Thank you for waking up for us.  JANELLE BYNUM: Good morning.  CORNISH: We were just showing the folks who are dancing out there, wearing costumes, but the court was also looking at the number of arrests that have happened since June 2025 outside the Lindquist Federal Building. 22 defendants this summer, and they're accused of attempted arson, you know, destructive devices, there were people who assembled a guillotine outside the ICE facility. And they also mentioned bomb threats, and even following ICE officers back to their hotel rooms.  So help me square these two narratives. Which is doing the damage here?  BYNUM: Well, I think this ruling gives Trump the green light to continue his attempted takeover of Portland, Oregon. And those numbers that you're citing are mere accusations.  And I think where we have to focus on is making sure that the First Amendment is protected. And when we were going through this in 2020, one thing to remember is that when you talk about why people are protesting and why things may get violent, what you have to understand is you need to address the grievances. And that's what the Trump administration is not doing. They need to address the grievances that people are bringing, and that's why they're protesting.  CORNISH: Is there any argument for Democrats to say nonviolent protests in particular might be the better approach here? Are there ways that you're, in a sense, baiting or being drawn into this argument by the White House?  BYNUM: Well, it's very clear to me that President Trump is trying to use our National Guard as toy soldiers. And that is where we have a problem. This is a distraction, and he knows that if he continues the distraction, he doesn't have to run us our money.  . . .  The president knows that he's messing with Portland, Oregon, and he's messing with the wrong people. What he needs to know is that he needs to run us our money. We need money for roads. We've needed money special education for our students. We need money for water projects. Those are all grants that we applied for that we expected to have so we can improve the quality of life of Oregonians.  He knows that he stopped that and he's trying to cover up for that. Run us our money. 
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 w

IT’S (D)IFFERENT: Legacy Newscasts SILENT on Maine Senate Dem Hopeful’s Racist Posts, Nazi Tattoo
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

IT’S (D)IFFERENT: Legacy Newscasts SILENT on Maine Senate Dem Hopeful’s Racist Posts, Nazi Tattoo

Once again, the legacy network newscasts come together to suppress a story that would be national news had it involved a Republican candidate for office. The latest instance of selective media outrage involves the suppressed shortcomings of via Maine Democrat Senate candidate Graham Platner. First, there were the posts. Per USA Today: According to the deleted posts, which were first reported by CNN, Platner went by the Reddit username “P-Hustle.” In his posts, he said all police are bastards, and rural White Americans "actually are" racist and stupid, reported CNN. He also responded to a 2013 post about asking people from other races questions. According to the Bangor (Maine) Daily News, Platner also questioned in one Reddit reply, “Why don’t black people tip?” The political candidate once worked as a bartender at Tune Inn in Washington, D.C.'s Capitol Hill. He has since apologized for the comments he made, adding they are “not reflective at all of who I am.” Not a peep of this aired on the legacy network newscasts, even as they spent the better part of last week being castigated for their deliberate omission of violent text messages sent by Virginia Democrat attorney general candidate Jay Jones. In fact, the Jones story only saw the light of day when the media were able to have something else to wash it out- in this case, a racist chat featuring Young republicans.  The posts were enough of a suppressed story, but then came the tattoos. Per Politico: Democratic Maine Senate hopeful Graham Platner expressed regret over getting a tattoo that appears similar to a Nazi symbol nearly two decades ago and plans to have it removed, his latest mea culpa after a week of damning headlines over resurfaced social media posts. Platner’s campaign sought to front-run opposition research about his tattoo — which resembles a Nazi skull and crossbones — during an appearance on the liberal podcast Pod Save America on Monday, with his campaign sharing a video of him dancing shirtless. Platner said he had no idea of any Nazi link when he got the tattoo. Imagine the dudgeon had a Republican purple-state Senate candidate been spotted with a tattoo of a totenkopf (the notorious Nazi SS “Death’s Head”), the signature emblem of Hitler’s SS. This would be a multicycle top story on the legacy newscasts, and congressional correspondents would dutifully shove a microphone into every GOP member’s face until they take a position on both the tattoo and the candidate dumb enough to get it. Alas, this wasn’t the case on the legacy nightlies. Viewers today heard more shutdown ragebait, and plenty about overseas aviation mishaps, but none about a highly touted Senate candidate with a D next to his name. Once and again, we are reminded that if it weren’t for double standards, there would be none at all.  
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
2 w

Morning Joe Crew Slimes 'Dark Underbelly of MAGA' Republicans
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Morning Joe Crew Slimes 'Dark Underbelly of MAGA' Republicans

The extremely poor choices made by a few bad apples gave MSNBC what it had been waiting for: a feeble excuse to lament the entire right. Tuesday’s Morning Joe brought on a few guests who were more than willing to censure Republican leadership for somehow allowing the inexcusable behavior to occur, and in the process suggest it was the future of the party. This came the morning after Politico reported on racially-charged text messages written by special counsel nominee Paul Ingrassia, which included a comment from him about holding a “Nazi streak.” Senate Republicans subsequently disapproved of Ingrassia’s nomination. The Atlantic staff writer Franklin Foer leapt at the opportunity to paint the revelation as an example of Republicans’ dirty open secret, speculating that “… surely this is the dark underbelly of MAGA that all the responsible people within who are — who have clung to the Republican establishment, to MAGA knows is there. And, you know, they will only blanch when they see these quotes.” Ignoring the fact that Ingrassia may have his nomination pulled then sure, Republicans will only “blanch.” The GOP must be associated with jerks even after they've disassociated themselves. Meanwhile, Democrats refuse to back away from Jay "Two Bullets to the Republican" Jones in Virginia. After a lead-in from co-host Jonathan Lemire, New York Times opinion writer Mara Gay further pushed narrative by connecting it to the New York Young Republicans who were recently under scrutiny: “You know, and there are some local Republican leaders, state Republican leaders who have condemned this. But that's a good look at the future of Republican leadership.” A natural separation of the wheat and the chaff was occurring. Those who ran to darkness and ignored wisdom’s calls were having their sins found out. That didn’t mean the entire next generation of Republicans would be led astray by fringe extremists. Meanwhile, some of MSNBC's favorites are wearing "I Am Antifa" T-shirts to protests.     Of course, no condemnation was complete without a rebuke against the President or his administration: “But I think — you know, speaking as a black American, you know, there's no surprise here. I mean, we see these views expressed from the White House, from officials consistently about non-white Americans, but maybe through more polite language.” No clear example was provided to prove her point. Maybe she was referring to ICE? Unlike his fellow guests, Axios CEO Jim Vandehei was not willing to demonize the Republican Party as a whole. But he was willing minimize death-wishing by equating it with racism: And you can't just say, “Oh, look at that Democratic Attorney General over there. He said something even crazier.” He did say something that was crazy, and it probably makes him unelectable. But what was said in that text chain is equally crazy, equally wrong. This was in reference to Virginia Attorney General candidate Jay Jones, a Democrat who recently came under a firestorm for fantasizing about murdering a Republican and his kids. If it was "equally wrong," why can't Democrats denounce him and force him out of the race? Co-host Joe Scarborough then went on a bizarre tangential rant about his upbringing. He claimed to have lived in a markedly anti-racist “new South,” where prejudice only really existed on the outskirts: I have lived the majority of my life in the deep South. […] Perhaps somewhere else, the darkness on the edge of town, there were racists and bigots talking this way. I never once — well, actually I did one time, I heard one time, one time. But other than this one time, I never heard this sort of talk. I never heard, and I grew up — not in a bubble. I was very — we lived in a very middle class family, went to Southern Baptist churches. I never once heard this kind of talk growing up. Scarborough was born in the early ‘60s, you know, the climax of the Civil Rights movement. Hard to believe nearly everyone in his childhood locale steered clear of racist talk. The transcript is below. Click "expand" read: MSNBC’s Morning Joe October 21, 2025 6:27:10 a.m. EST (…) FRANKLIN FOER: Okay. I mean — so, they're nominating a guy who as a self-proclaimed “Nazi streak” to the office of special prosecutor where he's supposed to be in charge, somehow, of protecting the ethics of the United States. You don't need a deepfake version of the video that we're seeing of the demolition of the White House. I mean, this is — I mean, it's amazing that a guy like this is able to find place ensconced in the inner circle of this administration. And, I mean, surely this is the dark underbelly of MAGA that all the responsible people within who are — who have clung to the Republican establishment, to MAGA knows is there. And, you know, they will only blanch when they see these quotes. And it's not even clear that this is enough to derail the guy yet. JONATHAN LEMIRE: Yeah, I mean, we heard it from Senate Majority Leader Thune. But it is, as Mika noted, so rare that Republicans stand up to Trump. I don't think we should take it as a guarantee that this does get pulled. We'll have to see. Mara, of course, it comes on the heels of other text messages that were revealed from those Young Republicans, those threads Politico doing good work on that as well. There's praise of Hitler in there, as well as other just extraordinarily offensive and racist comments. And we should note that those were defended by the Vice President of the United States, who— JD Vance taking to Twitter and saying, “Oh, these people were young and they made — we shouldn't cancel everyone for foolish indiscretions.” Mind you, a lot of those people were in their 20s and 30s, some of them office holders. Paul Ingrassia here, also 30 years old. MARA GAY: Yeah, these were not college group chats, just to be clear. You know, and there are some local Republican leaders, state Republican leaders who have condemned this. But that's a good look at the future of Republican leadership. And now we have someone, Ingrassia, who could be in a key role in the White House. You know, I think it's a good sign that Republicans are at least signaling through Thune a willingness to hold the line on this. It's a rare bright spot. But I think — you know, speaking as a black American, you know, there's no surprise here. I mean, we see these views expressed from the White House, from officials consistently about non-white Americans, but maybe through more polite language. So, this is just open bigotry, which in some ways is actually easier to go up against and to refute than just hatred overall and xenophobia and racism. So there's no surprise here. But we have to hold the line somewhere. And I think the question for Republicans is, where is the line? Is it Martin Luther king Jr. is — I think he was likened in this group chat to George Floyd, which I don't even want to go there, I mean, the disgusting, twisted nature of these text messages. It also just raises the question, you know, what does motivate these people? I mean, what kind of sick minds and sick individuals are going to be in this White House? I mean, racism is a sickness and these are public servants. I mean, it's horrendous. It's not surprising. And it's chilling. It's chilling. JOE SCARBOROUGH: You know what is surprising, Savannah high is, though, it seems like the Vice President of the United States, Jim, is — he's out there. He's the defender-in-chief of like the most shocking, outrageous things. And remember, I mean, this is the same guy — you just can't remind people of this enough — because this is the same guy who wrote a book, Hillbilly Elegy, came on all of our shows, was the darling of the east coast, like, cosmopolitan elite set, which remains one of my favorite — I don't know if Steve Bannon coined that term or not, but somebody should trademark “cosmopolitan elite.” I like that a lot. I think of a guy like in the 1950s and a hat smoking a cigar, about to go to the country club. Cosmopolitan elites. But that's who JD Vance was. JD Vance was also the guy lecturing Republicans that Jesus Christ expected more of us than to vote for Donald Trump. He was also the guy that said that, you know, Donald Trump, you know, vaguely reminded him of Hitler. I don't know the exact words. But you go down the list now and he was most definitely in a far different space than he is right now. And now I get — maybe it's because he wants to be the next not-Republican nominee, but it seems like he's the guy out there defending the indefensible every day. Especially online. JIM VANDEHEI: And again, this isn't who we are. Like, I don't think — SCARBOROUGH: No. VANDEHEI: — we live in a racist nation. I don't think most members of MAGA — SCARBOROUGH: No! VANDEHEI: — or people who voted for Donald Trump are racist. I think a lot of these — SCARBOROUGH: No. VANDEHEI: — racist people end up getting amplified on social media. Some of them end up in the White House. And there's only one response. This is where I worry we're just losing our marbles. If someone says something mean, if someone says something moronic, if someone says something racist, I don't care if it's in your party or the other party, you just say it's wrong. “We're intolerant of it. You're fired. You can't be around us. You can't be in a position of public power because you have nonsensical, ludicrous, and immoral views.” And you can't just say, “Oh, look at that Democratic Attorney General over there. He said something even crazier.” He did say something that was crazy, and it probably makes him unelectable. But what was said in that text chain is equally crazy, equally wrong. And when you don't condone it, it tells this group of kids, this group of men that it's okay. Like, step back. Why was there a large string of men in their 20s and 30s who went to college, who were in the professional class, who were clearly highly educated, thinking it's okay to praise Nazism. It's okay to say the most hurtful, ludicrous things about their fellow black citizens. It's just wrong. And it doesn't represent the bulk of the Republican Party, I don't think, and doesn't reflect America. And so the only thing you could say — SCARBOROUGH: It doesn’t. VANDEHEI: — is what I would say is an employer, “You're fired. You can’t say that. I don’t —” SCARBOROUGH: Yeah. VANDEHEI: “—  care what our rivals are saying. I don’t care what other people are saying. It’s just plain wrong.” (…) 6:34:37 a.m. EST SCARBOROUGH: And I just want to say — Jim said we don't live in a racist nation. I can only speak to my experience. I've lived in Georgia growing up. I lived in Alabama. I lived in Mississippi. I lived in northwest Florida, which is the deep South. I have lived the majority of my life in the deep South. And I will tell you through elementary school, middle school, high school, college. Perhaps somewhere else, the darkness on the edge of town, there were racists and bigots talking this way. I never once — well, actually I did one time, I heard one time, one time. But other than this one time, I never heard this sort of talk. I never heard, and I grew up — not in a bubble. I was very — we lived in a very middle class family, went to Southern Baptist churches. I never once heard this kind of talk growing up. This is not normal. Maybe it's been normalized over the past few years, but this is not normal. And I grew up in the deep, deep south. And I'll just say, I've told this story before, I'll say it again, Mika, because it explains the remarkable change that the south went through and how we took great pride at one time in being part of the new South. I was in first grade, and Mississippi, 1969, got integrated. That was just a few years after the civil rights killings in Philadelphia, Mississippi, which was just right down the road from where I went to elementary school. We were standing in line, we were about to get lunch, and this young kid said it — made a racist slur against a young black girl. I still remember all these years later, a student teacher — she probably went to Mississippi State or Ole Miss and was probably, you know, in her first year at Northeast Elementary School. She went over and she grabbed this kid by the ear and said, “Well, you might smell too if you didn't have indoor plumbing.” And I remember her grabbing his ear — probably couldn't do that today — dragging him out screaming, taking him to the principal's office, and we didn't see him in class again for three days. That was the example that was set in first grade. You don't — even in the midst of the integration fights in 1969, in rural Mississippi, that was the message that was being sent to first grade. “No! We live in a new south. We live in a new nation.” And that was the message that I received in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, northwest Florida, whether I was in class, whether I was on — playing baseball, whether I was in the locker room, playing football. You just didn't do it. And now for our leaders to be nodding and winking, saying, “Oh, kids will be kids.” No, no, kids won't be kids. Not in this realm. We teach our children better than that. We deserve — our children deserve better than that. So just a shrug and say, “Oh, kids will be kids. They're young. They're in their 20s and their 30s” No. These are far more than youthful indiscretions. This is a lurch back 70 years into a racist past that most Americans, most Republicans, most independents, most Democrats don’t want to go back to, Mika. (…)
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
2 w

Harry Sisson Dares Piers Morgan's Panel to Name One Democrat Who's Compared Trump to Hitler
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Harry Sisson Dares Piers Morgan's Panel to Name One Democrat Who's Compared Trump to Hitler

Harry Sisson Dares Piers Morgan's Panel to Name One Democrat Who's Compared Trump to Hitler
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
2 w

Obama Library Features a Massive Wall of Text That’s an Unintentional Tribute to ‘The Left Can’t Meme'
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Obama Library Features a Massive Wall of Text That’s an Unintentional Tribute to ‘The Left Can’t Meme'

Obama Library Features a Massive Wall of Text That’s an Unintentional Tribute to ‘The Left Can’t Meme'
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
2 w

JB Pritzker Laughably Claims Dems Are Against Open Borders and Then Pushes Amnesty for Illegals Aliens
Favicon 
twitchy.com

JB Pritzker Laughably Claims Dems Are Against Open Borders and Then Pushes Amnesty for Illegals Aliens

JB Pritzker Laughably Claims Dems Are Against Open Borders and Then Pushes Amnesty for Illegals Aliens
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
2 w

Bondi Slams Democrats' Planned 'ICE Tracker'
Favicon 
www.newsmax.com

Bondi Slams Democrats' Planned 'ICE Tracker'

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi assailed Democrat lawmakers who announced plans for a master "ICE tracker" that would mark the activity of federal immigration officers in the Los Angeles area.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 2206 out of 97837
  • 2202
  • 2203
  • 2204
  • 2205
  • 2206
  • 2207
  • 2208
  • 2209
  • 2210
  • 2211
  • 2212
  • 2213
  • 2214
  • 2215
  • 2216
  • 2217
  • 2218
  • 2219
  • 2220
  • 2221
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund