YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #astrophysics #cosmology #blackhole #keckobservatory #plasma #galaxy #keckcosmicwebimager #kcwi #vv340a #jetprecession #radiojet
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Living In Faith
Living In Faith
3 w

7 Ways to Create a Cozy Faith Filled Home for Christmas
Favicon 
www.ibelieve.com

7 Ways to Create a Cozy Faith Filled Home for Christmas

Transform your home into a faith-filled sanctuary this holiday season by weaving biblical truths into your traditions, from using sacred music to creating a dedicated space for prayer. Discover seven practical ideas to nurture your family's faith and find deeper peace and joy throughout Christmas and the New Year.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
3 w

Brain Implants, Yes or No?
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

Brain Implants, Yes or No?

In early 2023, the FDA approved Neuralink’s first brain-computer interface for human use, subsequently allowing a paralyzed patient, Noland Arbaugh, to control a computer cursor with his thoughts alone. This technology represents a genuine medical breakthrough for spinal-cord injuries. Elon Musk, owner of Neuralink, recently predicted that a million people will have these Neuralink brain implants by 2030, primarily to help paralyzed patients control devices with their thoughts. The company’s first human trials, including Arbaugh, have shown remarkable success: Patients can now play chess, browse the internet, and control computers using only their minds. Neuralink is now testing whether patients can also control robotic arms. These technologies represent incredible leaps forward in the ability to heal the body, but they also open the door to new questions about the proper limits of human enhancement. Once technology exists to restore lost function, what prevents us from using it to enhance normal function or to attempt to transcend human limitations altogether? Three Principles As medical technology advances, Christians need a biblical framework for assessing it. What might such a framework look like? Here are three principles. 1. Christians can accept medical technology as a good gift from God. Genesis 1:28 teaches us that humans were made to work and subdue the world. God gives us the good gift of tools, or technology, to aid us in fulfilling the cultural mandate. After the fall, God graciously allowed humanity to keep these gifts, even though the way we develop and apply technology is often corrupted by sin (see Gen. 11). 2. Christians should distinguish between restoration and enhancement. There’s a significant difference between using technology to restore normal human function and using it to transcend normal human limitations. Glasses restore normal vision. Insulin restores normal blood sugar regulation. A pacemaker restores a normal heart rhythm. Cochlear implants restore the ability to hear. All these technologies return individuals with disabilities or failing human function to a baseline of normalcy. There’s a significant difference between using technology to restore normal human function and using it to transcend normal human limitations. Enhancement technologies, by contrast, seek to make us more than human. They’re attempts to become “like God” (3:5). They include tech you might find in science fiction stories: enhanced organs, implants, or drugs designed to give typical people superhuman abilities or to sustain life forever. Whereas restorative technologies help to move individuals to normal human function, enhancement technologies promise to help humanity evolve into new kinds of beings. 3. Christians should be clear that tech doesn’t save. Technology is a good gift, but it cannot save us. Fallen humanity has always worshiped created things instead of the Creator. (Rom. 1:25) When we look to technology to make us gods, we’re making idols, placing our hope in a false gospel. Idols will always fail us. No matter how powerful restorative medical technology is, no matter how well it alleviates and restores our bodily problems, God’s Word makes clear that death is still appointed for every man (Heb. 9:27). Only Christ has conquered sin and death, and Christ alone is our solution to the problem of death. Do Brain Implants Cross the Line? Today, brain-computer interfaces that help patients regain lost abilities are clearly restorative in nature. Patients have lost function through injury or disease, and the tech helps to restore what was taken from them. But here’s where Christians need to think carefully. What happens next? Once this technology exists, the temptation will be to expand its use. Medical tech companies are already exploring whether brain implants could enhance memory, increase focus, boost intelligence, or grant abilities humans have never possessed. The same technology that restores function to the paralyzed can be used for transhumanist enhancement. Christians who work in the medical tech industry (and those considering implants) need to ask searching questions both about their motivation and the precedent the new technology sets: Why are we pursuing this technology—to alleviate genuine suffering and restore lost abilities, or to gain a competitive advantage, eliminate normal human limitations, and “upgrade” ourselves beyond God’s created design? Moreover, how does this technology compare to medical interventions already widely accepted? Is the design and use of this brain implant more like a cochlear implant (clearly restorative), or more like a technology that promises superhuman abilities (clearly enhancement)? Seek Wisdom Before You Adopt As new technologies develop, we need wisdom to evaluate them. Motivations matter. But even the best intentions don’t automatically justify the means. Before we adopt genuinely restorative applications of new technologies, we must carefully evaluate the risks and long-term effects. We should also ask whether less invasive alternatives exist. Just because something could help doesn’t mean it should be our first choice. These aren’t decisions to make alone. Seek wisdom and counsel from your Christian community—your pastor, church elders, and other mature believers. Evaluating emerging technologies is a process that should draw on the church’s collective wisdom, not just your individual choice. Evaluating emerging technologies is a process that should draw on the church’s collective wisdom, not just your individual choice. We should resist the temptation to put our ultimate hope in tech. The Christian response to human limitations and suffering isn’t to transcend our humanity but to trust the One who became human to redeem it. We can gratefully use technology to alleviate suffering while remembering that only Christ offers full and final healing. As these technologies become more sophisticated and accessible, the line between restoration and enhancement will be harder to discern. This is why we need a clear biblical framework now, before we’re faced with these decisions personally. We must be clear on the difference between fighting the fall’s effects and attempting to become “like God.” To this end, let’s evaluate new technologies with wisdom rather than adopting either reflexive rejection or uncritical acceptance.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
3 w

Love Your Neighbors Through Your Investing
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

Love Your Neighbors Through Your Investing

When my family arrived in the United States from India, we eventually settled in Medford, Massachusetts, an Irish and Italian neighborhood, with one Indian family now tossed into the melting pot. My classmates christened my brother and me with nicknames: Apu (the Indian character from The Simpsons) and Habib (from Married with Children). They followed us around asking if our dad worked at the Kwik-E-Mart or the 7-Eleven. The worst harassers were two brothers, Tommy and James, who lived a couple of blocks away and made our daily walk to the bus stop like a march to the guillotine. One afternoon, as I exited the bus, one of the boys gave me a fierce shove, sending me sprawling into the gravel. Tommy and James jumped on me, driving their fists into my ribs. I gasped for air and tried desperately to catch sight of the bus driver, but through the flurry of fists, I only caught flashes of yellow pulling away. A crowd of kids circled, watching the Indian boy get pummeled. Mercifully, a mom ran off her porch and grabbed both boys by the collar. Our neighbor Joe Platti, a retired Italian Marine sergeant with lots of stories and an unlit cigar always hanging out of his mouth, took me under his wing. Joe taught me how to throw a mean right hook, with an elbow follow-through that would shatter a jaw or nose. Joe installed a basketball hoop for my brother and me to come over and use, and he built us our first bikes. I began to love Joe as though he were my own grandfather; his wife, Irene, baked my first-ever birthday cake on my 10th birthday. I’m grateful for Joe. Even while I was an outsider as a young boy trying to get through elementary school, Joe made me feel that I belonged. But at school, I knew I didn’t belong. They stuck me in an ESL class with no instruction and just handed me a copy of Tuck Everlasting. I stared at the pages for hours and only saw hieroglyphics. I had a pink ticket for the cafeteria, which meant I was a free-lunch kid. I thought I’d arrived the day they handed me a blue ticket, moving me up the economic ladder to a reduced-price lunch and required me to shell out 40 cents for my corn dog, peas, and fruit Jell-O. We lived on the first floor of a three-story, three-family house. On our floor, five of us shared two bedrooms, with my sister, brother, and me crammed into the bedroom right next to the kitchen. I didn’t realize that I arrived at school every day smelling like curry, cumin, and garlic, but I saw the curled noses and grossed-out expressions. I heard the jokes. Help the Outsider I’m guessing a lot of us, in one way or another, know something about what it feels like to be the outsider. And seeing others at the margins, most of us want to help. When we’re at our best, our heart responds to those who are vulnerable. We know one of our fundamental responsibilities as Christians is to love our neighbor. We know one of our fundamental responsibilities as Christians is to love our neighbor. However, some of us need help connecting the dots between our biblical convictions and our behaviors—including our investments, especially when those investments seem like merely numbers on a screen. The challenge is to allow our best instincts (to love God by protecting others and valuing life) to animate our investing choices. If we want to join God in his mission to restore creation and fill the world with his goodness and beauty, this goal must affect every part of our life, including how we use our money. Our core beliefs and hopes must influence how we invest. Do Your Research Here’s the baseline I look for in any company before I’ll consider partnering with them: They must value each person’s freedom to live a good, meaningful life. I want to support businesses that consider those whom society often forgets and those who might not normally factor into a company’s business model. This requires taking a hard look at a company’s workers and surrounding community. Where are the blind spots (and to be sure, I have blind spots too)? Who is being forgotten? This value explains some of why I’m so keen on investments in companies researching cures for orphan diseases, those rare maladies that affect a tiny percentage of people and often receive little attention or funding. If a need is being overlooked, and it’s a need we can meet, it’s a thrill and joy to be part of the solution. This value also means I resist any industry that takes advantage of the poor and the marginalized. I expect the companies I own to guard our most precious gift—human life—in every way and at every stage, whether in the womb or in an underserved school, on a manufacturing line in Detroit or in the Philippines, in accessible health-care options for the young and for aged bodies nearing their final breaths. I refuse to profit from any business that subverts human freedom by preying on people’s addictive and destructive behaviors such as gambling, pornography, tobacco, and alcohol. Human life and freedom are our most basic rights and gifts, and we expect any business we support to value them. Support Human Flourishing Good investing means avoiding bad companies, but just as much it means supporting good companies. Before making any investment, I ask fundamental questions: Will this business contribute to human flourishing? Will this company do good for the world? And at Eventide (the investment company I cofounded), we have five essentials we look for to identify those good businesses that are doing good. We want our investments to support companies that (1) respect and value the freedom of all people, (2) demonstrate a concern for justice and peace, (3) promote family and community, (4) exhibit responsible management practices, and (5) practice environmental stewardship. When we find a company doing all these, we’re much closer to finding a good investment. Human life and freedom are our most basic rights and gifts, and we expect any business we support to value them. These characteristics are crucial because each, in its own way, supports our core responsibility to value life. Every person. Every life. This is where good investing begins: committing to protect life. All life. Jesus poured himself out for love of the world, and he invites us to do the same. Every life matters to God. Every neighborhood. Every story. And Jesus asks each of us to give our energy and skill in joining his divine reclamation project. When we say yes, when we follow Jesus, our arms open wide and our love expands. We do all this work with our witness and our generosity and our vocation, but also with our investments. We really can love God and our neighbors with how we invest our dollars. Our investments really can help us to welcome and nurture and protect the lives of every human, every person God loves.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
3 w

Scott Jennings Has One Challenge For JD Vance As GOP Presidential Nominee
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Scott Jennings Has One Challenge For JD Vance As GOP Presidential Nominee

'There really wasn’t that much of a debate'
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
3 w

INTERESTING TIMES: CBS Evening News Reports ‘60 Minutes’ Kerfufflev
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

INTERESTING TIMES: CBS Evening News Reports ‘60 Minutes’ Kerfufflev

The firestorm over the editorial decision made by CBS News to pull a 60 Minutes segment on migrant detentions at CECOT, the notorious Salvadoran prison, rages on. The controversy has now spilled over to the CBS Evening News, which aired a report on the growing scandal. Watch the report in its entirety, as aired on Monday, December 22nd, 2025: JERICKA DUNCAN: Well, now to a story about CBS News. A few hours before last night's edition of 60 Minutes, viewers learned that a segment that had been promoted would not air. It's about a notorious prison in El Salvador. And the Trump administration's decision to send Venezuelans and others there who it says entered the U.S. illegally. The correspondent, 60 Minutes veteran Sharyn Alfonsi, sent an email to CBS News colleagues saying the story is factually correct, and accusing CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss of pulling it for political reasons. Alfonsi says that despite requests for interviews, no one in the Trump administration would participate in the story. In an email, she wrote that, quote: "If the administration's refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we have effectively handed them a kill switch." In a statement, Weiss says in part, quote: "Holding stories that aren't ready for whatever reason, that they lacked sufficient context, say, or that they are missing critical voices, happens every day in every newsroom. I look forward to airing this important piece when it's ready." And CBS News released a statement saying: “The 60 Minutes report on ‘Inside CECOT’ will air in a future broadcast. We determined it needed additional reporting.” The copy read by fill-in anchor Jericka Duncan is virtually identical to that read by Nate Burleson on CBS Mornings, as noted earlier by our very own Tim Graham. What is most notable here is Duncan’s intentional pause and deep breaths before getting around to reading the copy. The pause itself: unnatural, given the cadence and pacing of an evening newscast, with fractions of a second before stories. The copy, structured with Alfonsi’s quote followed by Weiss’s quote and then the statement from CBS News, reads like a rebuke to an insurrectionist Alfonsi. This much is more evident once you lay eyes on Weiss’s email to the newsroom laying out her vision for the piece- this is, she wanted to see more journalistic rigor applied to the story, perhaps resulting in a harder line towards The White House, than was applied by Alfonsi and team. And given Alsonsi’s penchant for what could be described as partisan hackery (Exhibit A: her disgraceful smear of Gov. Ron DeSantis, using a doctored video clip to imply he was engaged in a pay-to-play scam with Publix Supermarkets over vaccine distribution), Weiss’s request seems more than reasonable.  This is a developing story, and we will provide additional updates as they come online. Finally, I’ll note that this is probably the one time where we may have looked forward to one of former anchor John Dickerson’s overwrought and whiny editorials on Evening News Plus,
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
3 w

How Lynndie England Became The ‘Poster Child’ Of Abu Ghraib Prison
Favicon 
allthatsinteresting.com

How Lynndie England Became The ‘Poster Child’ Of Abu Ghraib Prison

Bob Daemmrich/Alamy Stock PhotoLynndie England arriving at the courthouse at the Fort Hood Army post to face trial for prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib. In 2004, a series of disturbing photographs leaked, highlighting the horrendous abuse of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad, Iraq. At the time, the prison was being used by the United States after the invasion of Iraq to detain and interrogate those the U.S. deemed suspicious. The images showed some Iraqi prisoners stripped naked, some with hoods placed over their heads, some forced to pose in compromising positions, some dragged around on leashes, and some with feces smeared on them. But what stood out even more was the smiling face of Private First Class Lynndie England, who seemed to be reveling in the abuse she inflicted. England was not the only U.S. soldier to appear in the leaked photos, but she became the face of the Abu Ghraib scandal, thanks in large part to a photo that showed her holding a leash around a naked prisoner’s neck. Just 21 years old at the time, England would later claim that she only posed in the pictures because a superior officer named Charles Graner Jr. — who was also her boyfriend — pressured her into it. Her lawyers also claimed that she suffered from learning disabilities and mental health issues. But while England apologized for appearing in the infamous photos, she later said that she had no regrets that the detainees were tortured. At one point, she even compared the prisoner abuse to hazing done at some American colleges. She also insisted, “They weren’t innocent. They’re trying to kill us, and you want me to apologize to them? It’s like saying sorry to the enemy.” However, intelligence officers of the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq estimated that about 70 to 90 percent of Iraqi detainees were arrested by mistake and shouldn’t have been held in captivity in the first place. Lynndie England’s Life Before The Military Wikimedia CommonsLynndie England wanted to be a storm chaser, so she joined the military to save up money and reach her goal. Lynndie Rana England was born in Ashland, Kentucky, on Nov. 8, 1982, but her family moved to Fort Ashby, West Virginia, when she was two years old. Her father was a railway worker, and the family lived in a trailer park. As a child, she was diagnosed with selective mutism, an anxiety disorder that made it difficult for her to speak in certain social situations. She also reportedly had a learning disability. School psychologist Thomas Denne, who had worked with England when she was a special-education student, later recalled, “She would seek some form of authority in order to follow. She almost automatically, reflexively complies,” according to the CBC. Apparently eager to please, Lynndie England made it through high school with the support of Denne and others, graduating in 2001. She had also joined the United States Army Reserve back when she was still a high school junior, but her intention was never to stay in the military very long. England had only planned to earn enough money through her service to pay for college and pursue her real dream of becoming a storm chaser. She was eager for change, especially after working at a local chicken factory where rules were often broken by her fellow employees, and her manager reportedly made little effort to correct their behavior. England seemingly had a happy love life, as she had married a man named James Fike in 2002, but their relationship would ultimately end in divorce. In 2003, England was deployed to Iraq — and her life changed forever. Lynndie England’s Deployment In Iraq And Her Assignment At Abu Ghraib Wikimedia CommonsLynndie England and her then-boyfriend Charles Graner Jr. at Abu Ghraib prison. Before going to Iraq, then-20-year-old Lynndie England was working as an army administrative clerk in Cresaptown, Maryland, where she met Charles Graner Jr., a military specialist about 14 years older than her. The two began a relationship (while England was still married to Fike) that continued into their deployment, which proved to be problematic for England in particular. When they first arrived in Iraq in June 2003, they were initially stationed at Al Hillah, about 60 miles south of Baghdad, but that soon changed. The situation at Abu Ghraib had grown out of control. The prison had started the summer with just 700 prisoners, but in a matter of months, that number had risen to 7,000, while the staff members saw no meaningful gains. Janis Karpinski, the commanding officer who was in charge of Abu Ghraib and 14 other prisons like it in Iraq, said that the situation was “understaffed, overwhelmed, and harried,” according to The Guardian. So, the 372nd Military Police Company — which England was part of — was tasked with helping out with guard duties at the prison. Most of the guards insisted that many of the detainees were dangerous, but it was later reported that not every prisoner at Abu Ghraib was an insurgent. In fact, intelligence officers of the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq estimated that about 70 to 90 percent of Iraqi detainees were arrested by mistake. Wikimedia CommonsOne of the most notorious photos from Abu Ghraib, showing a hooded prisoner with wires attached to his hands. It was a disaster, there was no doubt about that. The United States had also approved the use of harsher interrogation methods in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks, techniques that were sometimes described as torture. It was the hope of the U.S. government that the typical rules would not apply during their War on Terror, that more extreme methods would be legally permissible. When the Abu Ghraib scandal broke months after England and the 372nd Military Police Company arrived at the prison, President George W. Bush appeared shocked at the abuse. According to the BBC, he declared, “We will learn all the facts and determine the full extent of these abuses. Those involved will be identified. They will answer for their actions.” But given the nature of the War on Terror and the approval of harsher-than-usual interrogation techniques, was it really all that shocking that abuse would permeate through some military prisons? In Abu Ghraib, cruelty wasn’t simply allowed; it was encouraged. The American public just didn’t know the extent of that cruelty — at least not at first. The Leak Of The Infamous Abu Ghraib Prison Abuse Photos Wikimedia CommonsCharles Graner Jr. punching handcuffed prisoners. The Associated Press had been reporting about the allegations of human rights abuses at Abu Ghraib since November 2003 — just a month after the 372nd Military Police Company arrived at the prison — but it wasn’t until April 2004 that graphic photos would confirm the reports. Those photos would have never reached the public if it wasn’t for a U.S. soldier named Joseph Darby. Darby had received a CD from Graner, which Darby thought contained memento photographs of their time in Iraq. When he looked at the images, however, he was shocked by the prisoner abuse that he saw — and he alerted the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division. Some of what Darby later described seemed to corroborate England and Graner’s accounts, that when the 372nd Military Police Company arrived at Abu Ghraib, the prisoner abuse was already rampant. Karpinski claimed to have had no knowledge of any abuse, and no one ranked higher than a sergeant was ever convicted of wrongdoing at Abu Ghraib, but Darby, England, and Graner all described their initial shock at the conditions. Wikimedia CommonsFormer U.S. soldier Sabrina Harman smiling to the camera while stitching a wound on a bound detainee at Abu Ghraib. “Nobody has ever said that publicly, but there were things going on before our unit even got there,” Darby said in 2006. “The day we arrived, back in October of 2003, we were getting a tour of the compound and we saw like 15 prisoners sitting in their cells in women’s underwear. This was day one; nobody from our unit had ever set foot in the prison.” Graner, who would later be described as the ringleader of the abuse, was also on record as having raised some initial objections. Lynndie England, meanwhile, had been assigned to administrative duties at Abu Ghraib and only spent time in the cellblocks so she could see Graner. “When [Graner] first started working on that wing, he would tell me about it and say, ‘This is wrong,'” England said. “He even told his sergeant and platoon leader. He said he tried to say something.” Regardless of their initial shock, though, Graner and England would ultimately become central to the prisoner abuse. Wikimedia CommonsCharles Graner Jr. and Sabrina Harman posing with a stacked “human pyramid” of prisoners. “They said we will make you wish to die and it will not happen,” recalled one detainee, Ameen Saeed Al-Sheik, to The Washington Post. “They stripped me naked. One of them told me he would rape me.” Another, Hiadar Sabar Abed Miktub al-Aboodi, said, “They forced us to walk like dogs on our hands and knees. We had to bark like a dog, and if we didn’t do that, they started hitting us hard on our face and chest with no mercy.” In fact, a photo of England holding a naked prisoner on a leash was a large part of the reason why she became the so-called “poster child” of the Abu Ghraib scandal. Another reason was her apparent joy in a different picture, which showed her smiling at a group of other naked prisoners, at least one of whom was forced to simulate masturbation. Wikimedia CommonsThe most infamous photo of Lynndie England showed her holding a naked prisoner on a leash. CBS showed those photographs to the American public for the first time on April 28, 2004, followed shortly by a report from The New Yorker, which added further context and details from a leaked Army report. It had been Graner’s idea to take many of the infamous photographs. He was also the one who gave the CD to Darby. Graner had taken other shocking photos too, one of which showed England simulating sex with a drunk soldier who had passed out. But while Graner was ultimately put on trial for his actions at Abu Ghraib and sentenced to 10 years in prison for his crimes, the focus remained largely on Lynndie England. The Aftermath Of The Abu Ghraib Scandal Wikimedia CommonsLynndie England posing with a naked prisoner who was forced to simulate masturbation. In total, 11 U.S. soldiers were eventually convicted of crimes at Abu Ghraib. Graner received the longest sentence of those convicted (though he ultimately served about six-and-a-half years of his 10-year sentence). Some other soldiers who faced legal consequences included Ivan Frederick, Jeremy Sivits, Sabrina Harman, Roman Krol, Armin Cruz, Javal Davis, and Megan Ambuhl (who was also having a relationship with Graner). Janis Karpinski, the commanding officer in charge of Abu Ghraib, was never criminally charged, but she was punished with a demotion. As for Lynndie England, she had pleaded guilty to prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by 2005 and was sentenced to three years in prison for her crimes, though she ultimately only served about half of that sentence. While she apologized for appearing in the infamous photos, she claimed that Graner had pressured her into taking them. “I didn’t want them,” she later said. “But he was so persistent. Go on! Just for me! If you loved me, you’d do it. I’m like, gee, okay, just take the damned picture.” Notably, England later said that she didn’t feel bad for detainees who were subjected to torture, even though the majority of the detainees at Abu Ghraib were eventually released without charge. Surprisingly, England has also said that she doesn’t regret her relationship with Graner — even though he ended up marrying Ambuhl — because Graner is still the biological father of England’s child, Carter. “I couldn’t have Carter exactly as he is without anybody else except Graner,” England told The Daily Independent in 2009, “so to me that’s the whole reason for me meeting him.” Wikimedia CommonsLynndie England, pictured in handcuffs. Since it was England’s face, not Graner’s, that got the most attention, England faced arguably the most public scrutiny when she tried to return to civilian life. She received death threats, and she also reported receiving a note from a stranger that told her that she should kill herself — and her child. Lynndie England has largely stayed out of the public sphere, resurfacing for occasional interviews, like in 2009 and 2012. Back in 2009, she said that she was struggling with depression and anxiety, she was unable to find anyone willing to hire her, and she was depending on her parents and welfare to get by. The question was, had she learned anything since her trial? “I had a lot of time to think about it after the trial and what I’d learned,” England reflected. “Thinking back… I don’t want to say I matured more, but I realized that I was so naive and trusting. But what happens in war, happens. It just happened to be photographed and come out.” After reading about Lynndie England, take a look at the declassified CIA torture manual from the Cold War. Or, learn about the death of Pat Tillman — and how the U.S. military tried to cover up how he died. The post How Lynndie England Became The ‘Poster Child’ Of Abu Ghraib Prison appeared first on All That's Interesting.
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
3 w

Goodbye, Robert E. Lee
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Goodbye, Robert E. Lee

[View Article at Source]Replacing Lee’s statue in Emancipation Hall is the final piece of a multi-year project to rewrite American history. The post Goodbye, Robert E. Lee appeared first on The American…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
3 w

Are Badenoch’s Tories Showing Signs of Life?
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Are Badenoch’s Tories Showing Signs of Life?

[View Article at Source]The opposition leader is giving Reform a run for its money in the race to be Britain’s preeminent party of the right. The post Are Badenoch’s Tories Showing Signs of Life?…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
3 w

The Failed State Of Minnesota
Favicon 
yubnub.news

The Failed State Of Minnesota

[View Article at Source]Welfare socialism, endless immigration, and lawlessness have destroyed the Gopher State. The post The Failed State Of Minnesota appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
3 w ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
⚠️ WHOA! AMERICA DID NOT EXPECT THIS! - FBI JUST DROPPED A BOMBSHELL REPORT
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 2389 out of 106027
  • 2385
  • 2386
  • 2387
  • 2388
  • 2389
  • 2390
  • 2391
  • 2392
  • 2393
  • 2394
  • 2395
  • 2396
  • 2397
  • 2398
  • 2399
  • 2400
  • 2401
  • 2402
  • 2403
  • 2404
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund