The jig is up; people have figured it out. They pretended this paper game was some big, sophisticated thing, and it turns out it was just a fraudulent shell game, selling stuff they didn't have with no intention of ever delivering. Full report: https://t.co/StIEgSCvNp#gold… pic.twitter.com/0f8LaLzaYB — Peak Financial Investing (@PeakFinInv) October 22, 2025

by Donald Jeffries, ”I Protest”: The monsters in our midst I spend too much time watching videos of perpetually angry Black people attacking and assaulting White people. Always easy targets. Usually in gangs. Often starting with a cowardly sucker punch. But you can’t ignore them. They’re everywhere. Earlier this year, the shocking frequency of them […]

by Nick Giambruno, International Man: Every time the US government has faced an existential financial crisis in its history, it has chosen to change the rules rather than honor its promises in full—usually by replacing gold or silver with paper. From the War of 1812 when interest payments were missed, to the Lincoln’s Greenbacks, to […]

from TheSaltyCracker: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Really? The JD Vance panic has begun already?!

ESPN commentator Stephen A. Smith made a surprising move during his latest interview. Smith while on the 7PM in Brooklyn podcast shared, NBA star Kyrie Irving was right to speak out against the COVID-19 vaccines. Irving was previously forced to miss all his home games for the Brooklyn Nets due to refusing to get vaccinated. Yahoo Sports reported more details on Smith’s comments: Stephen A. Smith has never been shy about calling it how he sees it, especially when it comes to Kyrie Irving. The two have clashed for years, their personalities and principles often at odds. But in a rare turn of humility, the First Take host is now walking back some of his harshest words about the Dallas Mavericks star. During the 7PM in Brooklyn podcast, Smith admitted he might have gone too far when criticizing Irving during his tumultuous Brooklyn Nets stint, particularly around the guard’s decision not to take the COVID-19 vaccine, NJ reports. “Kyrie’s a good brother. We used to butt heads because he used to miss work too damn much,” Smith said. “And I’m like, yo man, this brother’s electrifying, I want to see this brother dancing on the basketball court. I don’t want to hear no sh*t about no COVID vaccines. Get your a** on the court. We see you. Now, obviously in hindsight, the brother’s right because we see all the conspiracy theories that came out. And props to him for having the foresight to see that. We didn’t see that at the time.” Smith didn’t specify what “conspiracy theories” he was referring to, but his comments suggest a new level of empathy toward Irving’s perspective. It’s a striking reversal from his earlier stance, when he accused Irving of arrogance and selfishness for defying team and league protocols. When Irving refused the vaccine during his Nets tenure, the move sidelined him for much of the 2021–22 season and made him a lightning rod for criticism. Smith led that charge, publicly blasting the guard for “letting down” teammates and fans. But in the years since, Irving has rebuilt both his image and his career. His resurgence with Dallas, capped by a trip to the 2024 NBA Finals, reminded everyone just how special he is when he’s locked in. The conversation now reflects something deeper: a recognition that players, even polarizing ones, have the right to stand by their beliefs. While Smith’s claim that Irving was “right” may not align with medical consensus, the CDC and FDA still recommend the vaccine for most adults, it shows how public opinion can evolve once emotions settle. Watch Smith here: BREAKING: ESPN host Stephen A Smith just admitted that NBA star Kyrie Irving was right about not trusting the vaccine. The world is finally telling the truth. pic.twitter.com/2vl2LCy3nv — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) October 20, 2025 ESPN reported more details on Irving refusing to get vaccinated which resulted in him losing millions of dollars: Brooklyn Nets guard Kyrie Irving says he turned down a four-year extension prior to the 2021-22 season because of his decision not to get vaccinated against COVID-19. “I gave up four years, 100-and-something million deciding to be unvaccinated and that was the decision,” Irving said during Nets media day on Monday. “[Get this] contract, get vaccinated or be unvaccinated and there’s a level of uncertainty of your future, whether you’re going to be in this league, whether you’re going to be on this team, so I had to deal with that real-life circumstance of losing my job for this decision.” Irving, who is not vaccinated against COVID-19 and was forced to miss home games in Brooklyn until late March because of a New York City vaccination mandate, opted into the final year of his contract, a player option worth $36.5 million, prior to the season. The 30-year-old said he felt the decision whether to get vaccinated was like “an ultimatum” from the organization, in regard to his contract. Irving said he was hopeful that he would have the contract terms set prior to last season. “We were supposed to have all that figured out before training camp last year,” Irving said. “And it just didn’t happen because of the status of me being vaccinated, unvaccinated. So, I understood their point and I just had to live with it. It was a tough pill to swallow, honestly.”

A Biden-appointed judge has ruled that ICE violated an earlier agreement from 2022 limiting it’s work at courthouses. In his ruling, Judge Jeffrey Cummings emphasized that Agents should be arrested if they continue taking illegals into custody at courthouses. The centerpiece for the judge’s ruling is the location… COURTHOUSES. But the approach the judge is taking in the legality of the issue actually has to do with the so-called ‘warrantless’ arrests, presumably without cause — even though we’re talking about ILLEGALS inside the country ILLEGALLY. For his part, President Trump has been very clear as the Executive in charge of protecting America’s borders from illegal immigration. Here was his answer when asked directly how he felt about ICE arresting illegals at courthouses and court proceedings: REPORTER: ICE are making targeted arrests at courthouses. TRUMP: Criminals. They’re arresting CRIMINALS. I’m HAPPY about it. I WANT them to arrest criminals! ARREST MORE pic.twitter.com/XpVmz4HemM — Sara Rose (@saras76) October 11, 2025 That sounds like basic common sense! But according to Judge Cummings it’s a breakdown of justice for illegals to be taken into custody at a courthouse. Here’s a quick breakdown of that 2022 ‘agreement’ at the heart of Judge Cummings’ ruling to give a little background on what’s going on — this is from a story in Newsweek: A federal court in Chicago has ordered sweeping new limits on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in the Midwest, ruling that agents repeatedly violated federal law and a binding consent decree by arresting people without warrants. The case Castañón Nava v. Department of Homeland Security stems from a 2022 settlement requiring ICE to follow strict procedures for warrantless arrests for civil immigration violations across Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri, Kentucky and Kansas. The settlement agreement took effect on May 13, 2022, and was to remain in place until February 2, 2026. Cummings found that ICE “arrested twenty-two out of the twenty-six claimant class members without a warrant in violation of the Agreement and the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2).” The court concluded that the agency’s Chicago field office “failed to substantially comply with [the agreement’s] terms,” citing practices such as agents carrying blank administrative-warrant forms—known as Form I-200s—and filling them out after detaining individuals. Cummings wrote that the tactic was “explicitly designed to circumvent the requirement that officers have probable cause before a warrantless arrest.” I’m not sure how much more ‘probably cause’ an ICE Agent needs to round up illegals beyond the fact that they are ILLEGAL. But that’s the ‘agreement’ that was put in place under the Biden Administration, which Judge Cummings is now using to limit ICE’s ability to do it’s job. Here’s a quick video Tim Pool put out yesterday that I want to throw into the mix. He does a great job explaining this from the standpoint of Executive Authority. And showing how the BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S OWN PREVIOUSLY ARGUMENT in line with Executive authority shows how ridiculous this is: “They already arrested the guy who became president, and they want to put him in prison. What makes you think they wouldn’t go after a single federal agent?” Chicago-area judge rules ICE agents are subject to arrest at courthouses. pic.twitter.com/Wkh7i0PCEA — Tim Pool (@Timcast) October 21, 2025 Here’s the full screen version of that clip for easier viewing: “They already arrested the guy who became president, and they want to put him in prison. What makes you think they wouldn’t go after a single federal agent?” Chicago-area judge rules ICE agents are subject to arrest at courthouses. pic.twitter.com/Wkh7i0PCEA — Tim Pool (@Timcast) October 21, 2025 From a constitutional standpoint, Pool’s argument is air-tight. But notice the other point he made in his post and iterated in that video. They’ve already locked up the man who became PRESIDENT — they won’t hesitate for one second going after individual ICE Agents. And that’s why this matters.  This is nothing short of a fear tactic aimed at intimidating federal agents from doing their sworn duty according to the LAW. That, in itself, is illegal… I might add. The order was actually signed last week and has ALREADY GONE INTO EFFECT, according to this report published on the 16th by the CBS News affiliate in Chicago: Cook County’s top judge has signed an order barring ICE from arresting people at courthouses. Cook County includes Chicago, which has seen a federal immigration crackdown in recent months. Detaining residents outside court has been a common tactic for federal agents, who have been stationed outside county courthouses for weeks, making arrests and drawing crowds of protesters. The order, which was signed Tuesday night and took effect Wednesday, bars the civil arrest of any “party, witness, or potential witness” while going to court proceedings. It includes arrests made inside courthouses and in parking lots, surrounding sidewalks and entryways. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security defended the practice of making arrests at courthouses, calling it “common sense.” “We aren’t some medieval kingdom; there are no legal sanctuaries where you can hide and avoid the consequences for breaking the law,” DHS said in a statement. “Nothing in the Constitution prohibits arresting a lawbreaker where you find them.” Alexa Van Brunt, director of MacArthur Justice Center’s Illinois office, which filed the petition, said she was “gratified” by Evans’ order. “This is a necessary and overdue action to ensure that the people of Cook County can access the courts without fear,” she said in a statement to The Associated Press. It isn’t really surprising that we’re seeing a move in this direction from judges, especially in the Chicago area. Check out this clip from the Speaker of the Illinois House just last week demonizing the ‘masked ICE Agents’, and lamenting the plight of Illegals who are ‘AFRAID’ to move freely. He doesn’t just want to rely on those activist judges to hinder ICE. He wants to see LEGISLATION in the Illinois legislature that would put a stop to President Trump’s immigration policy being carried out completely: With Democrats like that carrying the torch, who even needs activist judges? But that’s just the point — what might be harder to pull off in a state assembly is EASY when it’s up to a single judicial tyrant.  (I said what I said.) The judge’s order also focused on ‘collateral arrests’ — those who aren’t necessarily the targeted individuals in an ICE raid, but who happen to be scooped up for being in the vicinity. Last I checked, you didn’t HAVE to be targeted in order to be arrested. If you’re found to be in violation of the law… you’re fair game by law enforcement! So which is it?  These anti-Trump judges and politicians can’t seem to make up their minds whether they LIKE criminals to be TARGETED… Or whether that’s a violation of the ILLEGAL ALIEN’S constitutional rights. I don’t generally use this phrase — but I can’t even… folks.  Where did these people go to school that their logic sucks SO BAD? Never mind.  That’s a different story for a different day. But those ‘collateral arrests’ has this judge thrown into a tizzy, declaring that ICE Agents — AND NOT ILLEGALS — should be the ones targeted for arrest… as reported by Breitbart: U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings ordered that ICE officers are barred from arresting migrants at courthouses if they don’t have a warrant. He also ordered that federal law enforcement can be arrested if they violate his orders. The judge’s order aimed to prevent what are called “collateral arrests” of people whom ICE officers discover are illegal on the spot. These are migrants that ICE agents come across by happenstance while looking for someone they have a warrant to apprehend. Cummings stated that courthouses must be places where witnesses and suspects feel safe. “The fair administration of justice requires that courts remain open and accessible, and that litigants and witnesses may appear without fear of civil arrest,” he said in his order. Judge Cummings also cited in his ruling arrests that have been made recently outside county courthouses where ICE has taken “collateral” migrants into custody in the Chicago area. “One thing seems clear: ICE rousted American citizens from their apartments during the middle of the night and detained them — in zip ties no less — for far longer than the ‘brief’ period authorized by the operative regulation,” the judge wrote. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said it intends to “comply with all lawful court orders and is addressing this matter with the court.” (Emphasis added.) Apparently scenes like this, with illegals being taken into custody, shouldn’t happen near or inside courthouses: THIS IS WHAT I VOTED FOR!!! ICE is PUSHING THEIR WAY through protestors and apprehending illegal aliens at a courthouse in NY. NO MORE GAMES!!! pic.twitter.com/Wvpoi4YoxS — Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) June 20, 2025 The fundamental unwillingness of the left to look at reality with logic and common sense is an insurmountable obstacle in these scenarios. I’m a red-blooded conservative with HEAVY libertarian leanings — to the point that I will often argue something on a moral basis from the pages of Scripture… While simultaneously arguing that the GOVERNMENT has no right to intervene in this, that, and the other thing. But I’m also a constitutionalist.  And the fact that we’re a REPUBLIC matters. You can’t build an argument on the basis of the constitutional illegality of WARRANTLESS ARRESTS… when the person you’re talking about doesn’t fall under the jurisdiction of the constitution to begin with — Because they are ILLEGAL! Until that lack of logic and academic dishonesty is addressed in the liberal courts, among leftist judges, and in democrat-dominated cities like Chicago… There’s only going to be one remedy for the maintenance of true constitutional justice. And that’s the force of will exercised duly and powerfully by the Executive Branch.

This was a big yet obvious discovery, The Texas Secretary of State has revealed thousands of people on Texas’ voters rolls who are not U.S. citizens. The discovery was made by Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson after she was able to cross check voter rolls in Texas with the Federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database. Newsweek provided further context about Nelson’s findings: The Texas Secretary of State’s office has identified 2,724 individuals on the state’s voter rolls who may not be U.S. citizens, according to a press release issued Monday. The identification comes from a cross-check between the state’s voter registration database and the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program. The Trump administration has faced legal challenges over its attempts to extract personal data, including immigration status, from voter rolls. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) expanded its SAVE program to verify immigration status across the country. The cross-check also raises potential privacy issues. Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson announced that her office had “completed a full comparison of the state’s Texas just identified 2,724 illegal aliens on the state voter rolls. Last year, @KHOU claimed, “No, noncitizens in Texas are not allowed to register to vote.” Why does the local news always seem to defend Democrat talking points? pic.twitter.com/xsC9IwBwuK — Christian Collins (@CollinsforTX) October 21, 2025 Read the full report by the Texas Secretary of State Office: Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson today announced that her office has completed a full comparison of the state’s voter registration list against citizenship data in the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ SAVE database. “Only eligible United States citizens may participate in our elections,” Secretary Nelson said. “The Trump Administration’s decision to give states free and direct access to this data set for the first time has been a game changer, and we appreciate the partnership with the federal government to verify the citizenship of those on our voter rolls and maintain accurate voter lists.” After running the entire Texas voter list with more than 18 million voters through the SAVE database, the SOS has identified 2,724 potential noncitizens who are registered to vote in Texas. Last week those voter files were provided to Texas counties, who will now conduct their own investigations into the eligibility of these voters as part of their statutory responsibilities to remove ineligible voters from the rolls under Chapter 16 of the Texas Election Code. Once that process is complete, individuals who are deemed noncitizens that voted in a Texas election will be referred to the Office of the Attorney General. A county-level breakdown of this data can be found here (PDF). The process for removing noncitizens from the rolls is outlined under Sections 16.033 and 16.0332 of the Texas Election Code. Voters identified as potential non-citizens will receive a notice from the county voter registrar. These individuals may present proof of citizenship in order to remain a registered voter. If a response is not received by the county in 30 days, the registration will be cancelled. In the event that a registration is cancelled, it can be immediately reinstated by providing proof of U.S. citizenship to an elections office or at a polling location. “Everyone’s right to vote is sacred and must be protected. We encourage counties to conduct rigorous investigations to determine if any voter is ineligible — just as they do with any other data set we provide,” Secretary Nelson said. “The SAVE database has proven to be a critically important data set and one of many that we will continue to use in Texas to ensure that only qualified voters cast a ballot in our elections.” Texas was among the first states to partner with USCIS to compare its voter list with the SAVE database. In its initial review, the agency focused on those who may have voted illegally in the November 2024 election. That process led to a referral of 33 voters to the Office of the Attorney General in June.