YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #americafirst #k #culture #fuckdiversity #streetingtrial #wesstreeting #saynottopubertyblockers
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Featured Content
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Let's Get Cooking
Let's Get Cooking
2 w

The Fresh Ingredient Chef Alex Guarnaschelli Uses To Elevate Any Dish
Favicon 
www.mashed.com

The Fresh Ingredient Chef Alex Guarnaschelli Uses To Elevate Any Dish

Chef Alex Guarnaschelli knows a thing or two about using simple ingredients to maximize flavor. Here's one that she likes to add to a wide range of dishes.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
2 w

EXCLUSIVE: Top FBI Whistleblower Responds To The Biggest Epstein File Dump In History!
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

EXCLUSIVE: Top FBI Whistleblower Responds To The Biggest Epstein File Dump In History!

EXCLUSIVE: Top FBI Whistleblower Responds To The Biggest Epstein File Dump In History! Kyle Seraphin- Who First Predicted That Trump Was Being Set Up By The Deep State 10 Months Ago- Responds To His Prediction Coming True & Predicts What's Next MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW!… pic.twitter.com/CJ30lU8ajj — Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) February 7, 2026
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
2 w

Lincoln’s Union Army was more evil than the Israeli Defense Force
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Lincoln’s Union Army was more evil than the Israeli Defense Force

by Paul Craig Roberts, Paul Craig Roberts: Recently someone sent me a copy of Walter Brian Cisco’s book, War Crimes Against Southern Civilians. Until I began reading this book, I had regarded Israel’s “defense force” as the ultimate in barbarism. The Israelis justify shooting mothers and babies in the head on the grounds that all Palestinians […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
2 w

Episode 5124: Finance Industry Is A Grift
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Episode 5124: Finance Industry Is A Grift

from Bannons War Room: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 w

How Verse Numbers Revolutionized Bible Reading
Favicon 
www.historydefined.net

How Verse Numbers Revolutionized Bible Reading

The Bible has been a foundational text of Christianity, and highly relevant in other systems of belief, for thousands of years. However, this famous book has not always looked the way it does now. Translations have taken the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek and converted them into thousands of varieties, from the classic King James Version to modern speak, but these are not the only elements that have changed. In the scope of the Bible’s lifespan, verse numbers are a recent invention. But why did a document with such a long-standing history suddenly find itself split to pieces? The demands of specific historical periods, growing church leadership influence, and more all pressed toward the introduction of numbers. And by doing so, they revolutionized Bible reading itself. Breaking Apart the Bible While no uncontestable numbers exist, many scholars argue that the Old Testament was written between the fifth and second centuries BC. Combined with the New Testament works in the first and second centuries AD, the Bible circulated as a continuous piece: one long story read from beginning to end. However, while this may have suited the local biblical scholars, it posed a greater problem when the biblical works began to disseminate into the hands of the general populace. Jewish rabbis had already identified the problem (that finding specific information was difficult among scrolls upon scrolls of text) and sought a solution. Lexical divisions Rabbis divided the Old Testament into parashah petuchah (large sections, called “open paragraphs”) and parashah setumah (smaller sections, called “closed paragraphs”). As part of the rabbinic-scribal tradition, these markers were implemented to help segment the text into more easily digestible portions. By the time of the Masoretes, whose role was to standardize the text, this style of separation was becoming stable. By the 1200s, Maimonides (a Jewish scholar) created halakhic requirements, or rules for how Torah passages should be written. This timeline demonstrated the first attempts to segment the Bible. Chapter divisions At around the same time as Maimonides was doing his work with the Torah (the 1200s AD), Stephen Langton, who worked as a professor at the University of Paris, introduced the concept of dividing the Bible into chapters. By this point, the Bible was in more hands than ever, and both church leaders and the public needed a more effective means of navigating its contents. It is Langton’s chapter divisions that remain in use now, more than 800 years later. Verse numbers While dividing the Bible into chapters proved useful for overarching church ideas, such as sermons on a particular passage, the Bible quickly became ubiquitous, and such markings were no longer sufficient. By the 16th century’s Protestant Reformation, the Bible had more new readers than at any other time in history. From the newly literate to the Catholic clergy debating the Protestants, everyone needed a clearer way to cite specific points and locate the information they wanted. Thus, Robert Estienne (Stephanus) stepped in to help. Focusing on the 1551 Greek New Testament first, Stephanus added verse numbers to break apart the text, moving on to the 1557 Old Testament later. Those verse breaks remained until they became standardized in the King James Bible. How Verse Numbers Revolutionized Bible Reading The contributions of Maimonides, Langton, and Stephanus all played pivotal roles in shaping how people’s understanding of the Bible transformed over time. However, not everyone was happy with the change. Some people, all the way through the current day, have claimed that the introduction of verses into the Bible interferes with its original intent: to be read as a single, continuous document. Instead, they argue that verse separations contribute to cherry-picking and the gradual dispersion of Christians into numerous subgroups, which in turn arise from value and belief shifts related to such cherry-picking. Despite this, the majority of history has treated verse separation as a form of progress. It provided numerous benefits when it first occurred, many of which scholars and religious groups continue to affirm. Standardizing expectations One of the most impactful changes introduced by verse breaks was their simplification of using the Bible. Anyone could turn to a specific verse to see exactly what someone else was talking about. For the purposes of personal study, listening to sermons, and doing research, this was invaluable as a means of “citing sources.” Of equal significance, pointing someone to a passage became logistically simpler. It is easier to explain that a passage is marked “Hebrews 1:4” than to say that it is located “toward the bottom of the page on the left, about halfway through the stack.” Scholarship For scholars, verse divisions proved invaluable. Comparing concepts became simpler, and organizing their thoughts to convey them to others was made easier by clearly labeled segments of text. This facilitated an increase in biblical scholarship, as claims could be more easily engaged with, all without the burden of an individual needing to remember a specific passage or go hunting for it again, sometimes for an extended period, before finding it. Memorization Among the general public, verse divisions pushed the spread of Christianity toward the majority opinion. Memorizing specific verses became simpler when they became “verses” rather than isolated paragraphs. This memorization was of particular use to the newly literate or still illiterate, for whom memorization served as an essential element of religious practice in lieu of reading. However, pastors also reaped the benefits. By being able to cite verses during sermons, they not only strengthened their claims but also equipped listeners with the means to study those same contents when they returned home.The post How Verse Numbers Revolutionized Bible Reading first appeared on History Defined.
Like
Comment
Share
Pet Life
Pet Life
2 w ·Youtube Pets & Animals

YouTube
This Rescue Dog's Transformation Will Leave You Speechless | The Dodo
Like
Comment
Share
Let's Get Cooking
Let's Get Cooking
2 w

For the Best Rice Krispies Treats of Your Life, Swap Half the Cereal With This
Favicon 
www.thekitchn.com

For the Best Rice Krispies Treats of Your Life, Swap Half the Cereal With This

You probably already have it in your pantry. READ MORE...
Like
Comment
Share
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
2 w ·Youtube General Interest

YouTube
This Hole in the Ground Could Make America Even Richer
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 w

London’s Restricted ‘March for Jesus’ Highlights Suspected Pro-Muslim and Anti-Christian Bias in Policing
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

London’s Restricted ‘March for Jesus’ Highlights Suspected Pro-Muslim and Anti-Christian Bias in Policing

The London Metropolitan Police restricted the “Walk with Jesus” procession, originally planned for Tower Hamlets, a predominantly Muslim area in East London. The Jan. 31 U.K. Independence Party-affiliated event was moved to Central London, where a few hundred people marched from Marble Arch to Trafalgar Square, led by Nick Tenconi. No major incidents were reported, but the event’s proximity to a pro-Palestine demonstration led to 14 arrests across the city. Critics say police actions favor Muslim sensitivities over Christian traditions, fueling concerns about free expression and religious equality. Organizers intended to hold a straightforward procession within Tower Hamlets, a diverse borough with a significant Bangladeshi Muslim population and differing cultural norms. This marks the second recent UKIP event to be blocked, following the “Mass Deportations Tour” in October. Such interventions are interpreted as preemptive measures targeting groups perceived as provocative, regardless of whether the events are peaceful or faith-based. Police cited past counter-protests as justification, but critics call this a “heckler’s veto” and question police neutrality. Tommy Robinson, a prominent figure known for expressing concerns about mass immigration and the perceived Islamization of the U.K., publicized the ban in contrast to permitted Muslim processions such as Shia marches. He recounted his initial aversion to the church until a prison pastor introduced him to the Bible. Although not an organizer, Robinson’s commentary highlights the broader cultural tensions and amplifies the perspectives of working-class communities who feel alienated by these changes. Perceptions of favoritism were also evident during the December Whitehall carol service, “United for Christ this Christmas,” organized by Robinson, which featured hymns and bible readings. Despite its peaceful nature and attendance of approximately 2,000 people, police classified the event as a protest and deployed significant resources. Critics argue that this classification reflects bias, with authorities treating Christian gatherings with suspicion while being more accepting of Islamic events. This situation is cited as an example of the politicization of religious events associated with conservative groups. This situation reflects broader societal tensions, as England, historically defined by Christian traditions, now includes areas such as Tower Hamlets that are described by some as “no-go zones” for Christians, with associated risks of violence. The existence of such zones is seen as challenging the concept of shared public spaces within a tolerant society. Reports show rising Christian nationalism and concern about Islamization. Left-wing groups like Hope Not Hate warn against divisive religious mobilization, but critics say these groups oppose patriotic, faith-based movements. Critics also say these restrictions create a two-tier policing system, undermining liberties and public trust in equal treatment. Those critics link this to Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan’s oversight. A December Policy Exchange report slams “two-tier policing” and recommends that Khan lose control over impartiality failures. Khan denies bias, citing crime drops, but the report ties his policies to trust erosion and protest disparities. Findings spark calls for reform and transparent accountability. Examples include protected pro-Palestine marches and stricter policing of anti-immigration protests. Critics cite inconsistent responses to different groups and events, calling for change. From an American perspective, these developments are seen as analogous to the silencing of conservative and Christian voices on university campuses. In the U.K., the issue is framed as a challenge to national identity, exacerbated by perceptions of policing that prioritize Muslim communities. This situation prompts broader reflection on how increasing diversity affects the nation’s cultural heritage. The expansion of areas with significant Muslim populations is viewed by some as testing the limits of societal tolerance, particularly when demands for deference are perceived to be enforced through threats or policing practices seen as favoring Muslim communities. This dynamic raises questions about the sustainability of multiculturalism in the absence of mutual respect for longstanding traditions. Proposed amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill regarding protests near places of worship may further institutionalize disparities and exacerbate existing societal divisions. The march signals a shift: exclusion risks confining Christian heritage to books. Without equality, Britain’s Christian principles yield to fragmentation with an Islamic veto, aided by anti-Christian police. This calls for defending fundamental values. The American experience with the First Amendment serves as a cautionary example regarding how tensions and perceived bias can undermine fundamental freedoms. These issues are increasingly relevant in global discussions on religious liberty and underscore the importance of advocating for balanced coexistence. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post London’s Restricted ‘March for Jesus’ Highlights Suspected Pro-Muslim and Anti-Christian Bias in Policing appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 w

Ellen DeGeneres Comes Crawling Back to US After Fleeing Post-Trump Victory, Buys $27 Million California Mansion
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Ellen DeGeneres Comes Crawling Back to US After Fleeing Post-Trump Victory, Buys $27 Million California Mansion

Daytime talk show host Ellen DeGeneres did not last long in her new home overseas. After President Donald Trump's 2024 election victory, DeGeneres and her partner Portia de Rossi relocated to a 43-acre property in Cotswolds, England. That decision in itself could be a separate conversation. DeGeneres, looking to flee...
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 2408 out of 111427
  • 2404
  • 2405
  • 2406
  • 2407
  • 2408
  • 2409
  • 2410
  • 2411
  • 2412
  • 2413
  • 2414
  • 2415
  • 2416
  • 2417
  • 2418
  • 2419
  • 2420
  • 2421
  • 2422
  • 2423
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund