Nebraska recently passed a law making it illegal for men to participate in women’s sports. The law also recognizes only two distinct and separate identities—male and female, as categorized by their reproductive systems. The “Stand With Women” Act states, “Males and females possess unique and immutable differences” that are “enduring.” It passed in the Nebraska Legislature by a 33-16 vote. The bill’s passage follows an executive order from President Donald Trump earlier this year titled “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports,” and his administration’s push for defining sex in federal law as strictly “male” or “female.” “This legislation achieves a key goal—protecting girls and women’s sports. It’s just common sense that girls shouldn’t have to compete against biological boys,” said Gov. Jim Pillen. Pillen signed the bill into law on June 4, according to his office. The text of the law states: “On average, male athletes are bigger, faster, stronger, and more physically powerful than their female counterparts. This results in a significant sports performance gap between the sexes. Because of the physical differences between males and females, having separate athletic teams based on the sex of the athlete reduces the chance of injury to female athletes, promotes equality between the sexes, provides opportunities for female athletes to compete against their female peers rather than against male athletes, and allows female athletes to compete on a fair playing field for scholarships and other athletic accomplishments.” According to Liberty Counsel, a nonprofit organization that advocates for religious liberty and the sanctity of life, “The law directs all interscholastic sports teams in the state from K-12 public schools, private schools, and colleges and universities ‘whose students or teams compete against a public school in an interscholastic sport, or a private school that is a member of an athletic association’ to be ‘expressly designated’ based on biological sex.” In 2020, Idaho became the first state to establish a law to prohibit men from playing in women’s sports, according to Concerned Women for America, a public policy advocacy organization that focuses on cultural issues. With the addition of Nebraska, there are now 27 states that have a law protecting women’s and girls sports, according to Liberty Counsel. The post Nebraska Bans Men in Women’s Sports appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Suppressed Research on Puberty Blockers Finally Published

AWFLS Being AWFL

Ryan Reynolds + nature’s unsung heroes = a fresh take on wildlife documentaries.

"Arrogant." "Dishonest." "A plague upon our state's gun owners."Aaron Dorr, the face of more than a dozen interconnected gun-rights groups across the country, has inspired some harsh descriptors from influential gun enthusiasts who theoretically should be on his side. But according to these critics, Dorr is actually a bully with few legislative accomplishments to his name, prompting some to claim he is a grifter who capitalizes on the good-faith donations of hardworking, trusting gun owners for his own gain.Blaze News spoke with current and former political leaders and a podcaster in Wyoming as well as a gun-rights activist in Illinois, who all told us the same story: Aaron Dorr and his organizations do the gun rights movement much harm and very little good.Who is Aaron Dorr?According to his eponymous website, Aaron Dorr is "a political activist with almost 20 years of experience fighting for the Second Amendment in state legislatures" across the U.S., including in Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Ohio, New York, North Carolina, and Wyoming.Wyoming state Sen. Larry Hicks (R-Baggs), who has been in the state Senate for 15 years, recalled that Dorr and his group Wyoming Gun Owners — or WYGO for short — "just kind of come out of the blue" and demanded that Republican legislators in the already gun-friendly state follow their lead."They were going around, trying to recruit people and teach them how to do confrontational politics, how to get in people's face and intimidate them," Hicks explained to Blaze News.Hicks said that some "tremendously weak" lawmakers caved to Dorr and WYGO, unable to withstand the "intimidation tactics" and eager for the campaign contributions WYGO could send their way.'WYGO members scored a lot of wins tonight, but nothing gave me more pleasure than watching our members piss on your political grave.'Other Republicans like Hicks found the approach off-putting and became instantly wary of Dorr and WYGO. Their lack of cooperation prompted Dorr and his "sycophants" to characterize these politicians as spineless, unprincipled RINOs — Republicans in name only, Hicks explained. An exchange between WYGO and a then-Wyoming lawmaker in the comments section of a 2019 WYGO Facebook post seems to confirm Hicks' assessment. Though the lawmaker initiated a civil discussion in response to a video from Dorr, WYGO shot back with insults, calling the lawmaker an "ignorant," "back-stabbing" traitor who has "never stood tall for gun owners."Dorr does not just verbally attack legislators he considers adversarial. He often threatens to support their challenger in an upcoming primary.One Wyoming politician who may have fallen victim to a primary campaign from Dorr and WYGO is former state Rep. Mark Jennings (R-Sheridan). According to Vote Smart, the National Rifle Association gave Jennings a 92% rating in 2024, and he was endorsed for re-election by Gun Owners of America that year as well, his campaign Facebook page showed.RELATED: Good guy with a gun blows away suspect who shot 2 during downtown fight, ran off Composite screenshot of photos from Mark Jennings WY State Representative House District 30 Facebook page. Used with permission.Jennings worked with Dorr when he was first elected in 2014 and even partnered with him to pass a Stand Your Ground law as recently as 2018. However, Jennings said he ran afoul of Dorr after putting forth in the Wyoming House a Second Amendment Preservation Act-type bill, commonly referred to as a SAPA bill, that Dorr had not endorsed.According to Jennings, Dorr later cornered him in a hallway, enraged that Jennings had not first asked his "permission" to run the SAPA bill."You shouldn't have run that bill in this last session," Jennings recalled Dorr saying. "It's not my bill, and you didn't get permission, and we're not going to put up with that kind of nonsense.""Dorr had made it very clear with foul language and threats that he was going to see to it that I was not going to remain in office," Jennings added.Dorr seemed to make good on that promise. When Jennings made a run for a state Senate seat last year, WYGO supported Jennings' primary opponent, state Rep. Barry Crago, who ended up winning both the primary and the general election. Sen. Hicks, a friend of Jennings, claimed WYGO and Dorr played a key role in torpedoing Jennings' chances. "They absolutely targeted him because he wouldn't buckle down and just toe their line," Hicks told Blaze News. "And he stood up to them."The night the results of the primary were announced last August, Dorr apparently sent Jennings a scathing text message celebrating Jennings' loss and making overt reference to their differences over the SAPA bill."I told you, two years ago, if you f**ked around with SAPA and with WYGO you would be held accountable. Tonight, I kept that promise," Dorr wrote, according to a screenshot sent to Blaze News."WYGO members scored a lot of wins tonight, but nothing gave me more pleasure than watching our members piss on your political grave," he added. "Enjoy your free time in January."RELATED: Trump state, Biden agenda: Wyoming gets played by green grifters Screenshot sent to Blaze NewsIn an email to Blaze News, Aaron Dorr described Jennings as "a RINO State Representative." Dorr also bragged that Jennings "lost his primary election last year in Wyoming after we exposed his pathetic record on gun rights.""Most organizations are too afraid to call out anti-gun Republicans, which is why they are never attacked and why freedom so often dies, even in 'red' state legislatures," Dorr continued. "We're not afraid to call them out, which is why we're loved by our members and have been attacked by the left and the media through hundreds of phony 'investigative stories' in a coordinated effort to silence us."Because a relative of Rep. Jennings works for Mercury Radio Arts — a production company created by Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck and that produces podcasts for Blaze Media — Dorr also took direct aim at Blaze News in his email, claiming we had deliberately withheld a "conflict of interest" from him in our initial phone conversation and that our investigation into his activism was a mere pretense "to settle a personal score for a colleague.""I had high hopes that we could engage in a productive conversation about the Dorr Brothers and our proud advocacy on behalf of gun owners in state legislatures all over the country. There is a lot to talk about," he wrote. "[But] you are not interested in the truth.""Sad stuff coming from a media company like TheBlaze, which has traditionally enjoyed a strong reputation amongst gun owners."'No compromise,' no matter whatAccording to its website, WYGO wants "to expand the Second Amendment for our members, not to protect the careers of politicians in Cheyenne!" Its affiliated groups in Iowa and Missouri make a similar statement. However, most of the affiliated groups bill themselves as absolutists, claiming to be the only "No-Compromise gun rights organization" in their respective states, which include Alabama, Illinois, and New York.While a "no compromise" pledge from a well-connected group may compel Republicans in red states like Alabama to remain committed to the right to bear arms, that approach in deep-blue states like Illinois and New York is more puzzling. As John Boch of Guns Save Life in Illinois told Blaze News, support for gun control far outweighs the support for gun rights in the Illinois state capital."Frankly, we could have 100 lobbyists in Springfield," Boch said. "We could have 1,000. And when it comes to the gun issue, we don't have the votes to stop anything. It's just the sad reality of life on the ground here."'They want it to fail so that they can raise money. They can say, "See how bad these legislators are?"'Blaze News was curious to know why Dorr's groups would demand a hardline, "no compromise" stance from pro-2A politicians in Democrat strongholds since doing so makes any progress on the issue even less likely than it already is. Dorr did not respond to our question on the subject, but the others who spoke with Blaze News claimed that Dorr is more interested in stirring up public emotions about gun legislation, both good and bad, rather than helping to pass or defeat it.Former state Rep. Mark Jennings said Dorr takes this same approach even in Wyoming, the state with perhaps the highest per capita rate of gun ownership in America."They don't really want it to pass," Jennings said, referring to a SAPA bill. "They want it to fail so that they can raise money. They can say, 'See how bad these legislators are?'"RELATED: Catholic craft brewers take a stand for gun ownership — (@) Jennings, Hicks, and David Iverson, host of the "Cowboy State Politics" podcast, all noted that though Second Amendment Protection Act bills might seem attractive to gun enthusiasts, some such measures can create major problems, especially for law enforcement. For example, a failed version of SAPA that Dorr and WYGO once promoted in Wyoming would have eliminated qualified immunity protections for cops, all three men told Blaze News. As a result, police departments from around the state firmly opposed it, rendering it practically dead on arrival in Cheyenne."It's got no hope of passing," Iverson told Blaze News, "but [Dorrs and WYGO] do it anyway because they can raise money off of it."'They're just siphoning off money from well-meaning gun owners who don't know any better.'Jennings recalled an instance in which Dorr and then-Wyoming state Sen. Anthony Bouchard (R), who founded WYGO, were invited to testify about a SAPA bill in front of a legislative committee but refused, ostensibly so they could later blast the committee members for shutting them out."[The committee chair] asks them to testify on this SAPA bill. They literally refuse," Jennings said. "She actually asks them point blank: 'I've asked you three times. Is there anyone else that wants to testify?' They don't do it, and then five minutes later in the hallway, they're on their podcast or they're filming their stuff, saying, 'This was just a kangaroo court.'"In reply to questions about his legislative victories, Dorr told Blaze News:Over the last 17 years, we’re proud to have passed Constitutional Carry, Stand-Your-Ground law, the Second Amendment Preservation Act, a ban on 'Red Flag’ laws and more. We’re equally proud of the gun control bills we’ve defeated (especially those filed by anti-gun RINOs) and our massive Circuit Court victories in cases like Wyoming Gun Owners v Gray. But the list of anti-gun incumbents removed from office by our members through our educational efforts at election time — a list numbering well over 100 — may be our biggest achievement.Despite making contact with Sen. Bouchard on multiple occasions and leaving several messages, Blaze News never received a comment from him.'Professional grifters'All of the sources who spoke with Blaze News said that Aaron Dorr uses high-profile activism — which has since spread to other issues, including the pro-life movement and COVID-related government tyranny — as a massive fundraising scheme."When you look at their organization nationwide, you get a pretty good picture of really what the main purpose behind their organization is is raising money for themselves under the guise of Second Amendment advocacy," Iverson said.Jennings made similar comments. "That's how they do business," he explained. "They put it out there that everybody's beating up on them. 'Please send money.'""They're professional grifters," Jennings added. "There's no question.""They found a way to get people to send them money, with all of their rhetoric and their lies," added Sen. Hicks.'You're being lied to.'John Boch of Guns Save Life said he had heard about Dorr and his groups' "shenanigans in other states where they fundraise the heck out of everything and don't really do anything." However, those "shenanigans" hit closer to home after Boch obtained a four-page fundraising letter from WYGO-affiliate Illinois Firearms Association, signed by Dorr, asking recipients to make a donation to help "mobilize as many gun owners as possible" against a gun-control bill in Illinois pushed by Democrats."I think they're just siphoning off money from well-meaning gun owners who don't know any better," Boch explained.RELATED: Illinois Democrats beloved by teachers' unions target homeschooling families, religious schools Screenshot given to Blaze News"Just out of the blue, they rolled into Illinois," Boch claimed. "And here they are, sending out these letters. And they send out the same letter every month, every 30 days."After doing some investigating, Boch learned that the address for Illinois Firearms Association listed on the letter is actually a private mailbox inside a UPS store in Peoria. Boch doubts that Dorr and his associates in Illinois Firearms Association have made strong connections with any Illinois state lawmakers."I've never seen anything of them actually being in Springfield," Boch said. "I'm going to say it didn't happen, but nobody's ever told me that they've seen them in person in Springfield."Blaze News heard similar stories that Dorr rarely visits the states whose lawmakers he claims to lobby on behalf of gun owners. In fact, Iowa state Rep. Matt Windschitl (R-Harrison), a strong gun-rights proponent, took to the floor of the chamber in 2017 and excoriated Dorr and other leaders of Iowa Gun Owners, yet another WYGO-affiliated group, for failing to attend legislative sessions when a major gun-rights bill was under consideration."Where are they?" Windschitl railed. "Why aren't they registered on this bill? Why did they not even come to a subcommittee to give their opinion on what we're trying to advance? Where are they? Where have they been?""They're not even registered on this bill," he continued, "and yet they've already gone out, taking credit for it.""You're being lied to."Even though Dorr fails to show up in Des Moines at key moments for gun owners, he still heavily fundraises in the state, Windschitl warned. "If you're sending this guy money, I'm asking you to stop."Windschitl did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News, and Dorr did not reply to our question regarding the grifting allegations.A sketchy bottom lineDespite these aggressive fundraising efforts, Dorr appears to receive little money from his bevy of organizations. Tax filings reveal that Dorr logs very few working hours for them and earns almost no salary from them. Iowa Gun Owners appears to be the lone exception. The 2022 tax filing for the group, the most recent filing available, claimed that Dorr worked 35 hours per week that year and was compensated $60,000.'AT ROCK BOTTOM COST!'Christopher Dorr, believed to be one of Aaron's brothers, is named in tax filings as the executive director of Ohio Gun Owners. A Chris Dorr is likewise identified as the executive director of the Pennsylvania Firearms Coalition. In 2022, Chris Dorr reportedly worked 40 hours per week at and collected $72,000 from each group. If so, he put in a total of 80 hours per week that year and took home less than $150,000 as a result.Notably, the Dorr-affiliated Missouri Firearms Coalition is not listed as a tax-exempt organization in the IRS database, even though Aaron Dorr lists Missouri as his home state on his personal website.RELATED: Harris not only threatened to storm the homes of legal gun owners — she supported a handgun ban Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty ImagesJust because their nonprofits do not always pay the Dorrs well, however, does not mean they are not profiting off their activism. Aaron Dorr and some of his brothers, including Chris, also run Midwest Freedom Enterprises, a private company that purports to provide "gun rights and grassroots conservatism all across America ... AT ROCK BOTTOM COST!" According to a 2020 exposé on the Dorrs from NPR, Rep. Windschitl of Iowa openly suggested that Midwest Freedom is actually the main source of their income, not the gun nonprofits:If you look at their 990s, not only in Iowa, but in the other states, they all claim that they're working 80 — 60 to 80 hours a week and getting no salary. The only way that they could be paying themselves is through their Midwest Freedom Enterprises LLC. They've got to be funneling money into that through the donations they're bringing in and then somehow driving a salary out of that. And from my understanding of tax code, federal tax code, that's a violation of 501(c)(4) nonprofit status.Some sources who spoke with Blaze News likewise speculated that the Dorrs may be cashing in through Midwest Freedom. However, Iverson of "Cowboy State Politics" also emphasized that even with all their fundraising operations and the Midwest Freedom business, the Dorrs do not seem to be doing anything illegal — just untoward."I honestly think that what they're doing is legal to the letter of the law," Iverson opined. "It's just not entirely ethical."Dorr did not respond to Blaze News' questions about Midwest Freedom or the tax filings from his nonprofits.'Exploit a lot of people and take a lot of money'Cognizant that activists who agree on the substance of an issue may disagree vehemently on the best ways to advocate for it, Blaze News asked the critics whether they viewed Aaron Dorr as an effective lobbyist for gun rights, even if his methods do not suit their personal taste.Boch of Illinois gave the most succinct reply: "Hell no."When attempting to list Dorr's "redeeming qualities," Sen. Hicks could come up with only one: "lying." "I hate to speak ... bad about anybody, so I will just stop with that," he said.'If it's not a perfect bill, they're going to be adamantly opposed to it, and they're going to crucify anybody that supports it.'David Iverson of "Cowboy State Politics," by contrast, did sincerely identify some positive contributions the Dorrs have made to the gun-rights movement. "They have been successful in getting some people that truly are not conservatives, that are against the Second Amendment kicked out of office," he told Blaze News. "There's been a couple of cases where they've gotten rid of, or they've really helped to get rid of, some pretty bad guys."Additionally, Iverson confirmed that Aaron Dorr did visit Cheyenne to advocate for "no gun-free zones" on at least one occasion.Other than that, the men had nothing to say in favor of Aaron Dorr or the Dorr family."They are one of these people, if it's not a perfect bill, they're going to be adamantly opposed to it, and they're going to crucify anybody that supports it," Boch claimed."When you look at the sum total of what they do," Iverson concluded, "they exploit a lot of people and take a lot of money from them.""And really, they don't produce a whole heck of a lot."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

As President Donald Trump's administration prepares a grand and patriotic 250th anniversary celebration for the U.S. Army, George Soros-funded progressive activists are plotting a meticulously organized counterprotest to politicize the military milestone.The White House has stated that the Grand Military Parade scheduled for June 14 in Washington, D.C., aims to "celebrate the legacy of the Army and express our deepest gratitude to those who have served and continue to serve in its ranks."'That AFL-CIO is openly involved in sponsoring the No Kings rally should raise extreme concerns as to the rally's true purpose.'"For 250 years, the U.S. Army has defended our nation, upheld the ideals of freedom and democracy, and served with courage at home and abroad. From the Revolutionary War to today, the Army's soldiers have embodied duty, honor, and sacrifice, ensuring the security of the United States and its people," the administration's America 250 website reads.Despite this tribute to military service and national unity, progressive activists backed by wealthy donors and taxpayer-funded groups are orchestrating a nationwide protest to overshadow the Army's milestone with an anti-Trump agenda.RELATED: White House hammers liberals for gaslighting about LA riots: Burning cities isn't justice — it's chaos White House prepares for U.S. Army 250th anniversary parade. Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty ImagesProgressive protests target Army's anniversaryThe Indivisible Project, a progressive organization formed in 2016 to counter Trump, and its "pro-democracy partner organizations" announced in early May a nationwide effort to protest the Army's parade.With thousands of events registered across the U.S., the demonstration, dubbed the "No Kings Nationwide Day of Defiance," aims to steal the spotlight from the historic celebration by mobilizing against "corrupt, authoritarian politics."The No Kings movement has framed the patriotic event as Trump's "self-aggrandizing $100 million birthday celebration," claiming the president is attempting to use the parade to flex his authoritarian power on the world stage. However, that framing is misleading, as the parade's date coincides with multiple events: Trump's 79th birthday, the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, and Flag Day.When asked about the No Kings protests, Trump responded, “I don't feel like a king. I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.”The No Kings movement has used alarmism to rally progressives against Trump, spreading unsubstantiated allegations that his administration is guilty of grave abuses, including suppressing free speech, detaining political opponents, threatening to deport American citizens, defying the court, and "disappear[ing] people off the streets.""President Trump has already indicated that he's aiming for at least a third term," a No Kings host toolkit reads. The No Kings movement is mobilizing its base with an exaggerated narrative that casts Trump as a menacing authoritarian dictator wielding unchecked power, painting him as a threat that demands urgent action to halt his perceived tyranny.'All people who show up with guns are not going to be our enemies, and everybody who shows up with one is not going to be at an elevated risk for using their weapon.'Beyond portraying the military parade as Trump's personal birthday celebration, No Kings is strategically avoiding staging protests in the D.C. area, instead hoping to draw attention away from the parade's venue.Reclaiming the American flag is key for the movement to succeed in counterprogramming the Army's anniversary event. Those participating in the protests were encouraged to bring the American flag to "reclaim this symbol and remind the world that the freedom we stand for is freedom for all."RELATED: 250 years after the British invaded my hometown U.S. Army soldiers prepare for military parade. Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty ImagesWho's behind the No Kings protest?The massive coordinated effort further fuels concerns that the recent protests, including those that led to destructive and violent riots in Los Angeles, are funded by activist organizations and left-wing groups with deep pockets. While Indivisible Project claims it is a "grassroots" movement, advertising the No Kings protests as a "march against authoritarian politics and billionaire takeover," it relies on vast sums from left-leaning tycoons notorious for manipulating elections and movements. These considerable grants and donations enable it to organize the large-scale and synchronized rally while disguising its elite-driven agenda as a people-powered revolt. Indivisible Project's most recent tax filings reveal that the group reported $12.6 million in revenue in 2023. Indivisible Civics, another 501(c)(3) under Indivisible's mission, reported $5.1 million in revenue in 2023. Combined, the two organizations have over $11 million in assets.Further shattering Indivisible's "grassroots" claims, George Soros' Open Society Foundations has heavily funded the group, providing $7.2 million in grants since 2018, including $3 million in 2023. DataRepublican has also linked No Kings' funding to the ACLU and its various local chapters.Likewise, several local branches of the AFL-CIO, a massive labor union, sponsored the No Kings rallies, including in Minnesota, where Governor Tim Walz is slated to speak, and Kentucky. The AFL-CIO has received millions of dollars in taxpayer funds yearly. The AFL-CIO's Solidarity Center reported receiving $69 million in federal grants in 2023 and another $59 million in 2022."AFL-CIO is one of the key taxpayer-funded organizations in effecting regime change all over the world," DataRepublican warned. "That AFL-CIO is openly involved in sponsoring the No Kings rally should raise extreme concerns as to the rally's true purpose."No Kings' reliance on billionaire backers exposes its hypocrisy, crusading against elite control while embodying the wealth-driven influence it claims to oppose.RELATED: Billionaire Walmart heiress funds anti-Trump chaos, backs radical 'No Kings' protests Photo by Paul Weaver/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty ImagesMeticulous planning and endless resourcesSince announcing the protests on May 6, in just over one month, the Indivisible Project and its partners have put together a highly structured plan for the demonstrations, including hosting regularly scheduled virtual meetings with volunteer protesters leading up to the rallies, assigning individuals to take on specific roles during the demonstrations, and providing numerous training and media assets.Those who signed up to partake in the protests, particularly those volunteering to lead in any capacity, are provided with links to "Know Your Rights Training" hosted by the American Civil Liberties Union, "Safety and Deescalation Training," "Media and Messaging Training," and a 32-page "Peacekeeper Training Workbook." Protest "hosts" are also provided with an 18-page "toolkit" and a help hotline available 12 hours a day from June 11 through June 14.A No Kings team reviews and approves each scheduled event within 48 to 72 hours of the initial request. The group anticipates over 2,000 protests across the nation with millions of attendees. Protesters are assigned to detailed roles for the demonstrations — acting as hosts, safety leads, police liaisons, peacekeepers, and media speakers — and provided coaching on how to show up to the event and respond to various situations.No Kings' virtual training meetings revealed a sophisticated level of organization.During a No Kings' "Host Update Call + Marshals Training" meeting on Wednesday evening, organizers provided de-escalation role-play scenarios to teach protesters how to handle hecklers, counterprotesters, and even "somebody on our side" who may try to "incite violent action" by bringing "paint balloons or rocks so that they can encourage other people to throw things."The presenters also discussed the possibility of protesters and counterprotesters bringing firearms to the demonstrations in open-carry states."In an open carry state, you're going to have to really watch how people are showing up. Are they aggravated? Are they wearing a T-shirt that says 'Indivisible' on it? It's going to be subjective," Nadine Bloch, an executive training conductor with Beautiful Trouble, stated on the training call. "All people who show up with guns are not going to be our enemies, and everybody who shows up with one is not going to be at an elevated risk for using their weapon."'Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles in response to President Donald Trump's enforcement of immigration law.'Also during the training call, Stephen Piggott with Princeton University's Bridging Divides Initiative addressed the potential for the presence of counterprotesters."We want to emphasize that recent anti-administration protests have remained peaceful, with only isolated incidents of conflict and minimal counterprotester activity. We looked at data from the two most recent nationwide protest days, May Day and the April 5 Hands Off protests. And we found that 99% of these protests — so 1,029 out of the 1,031 — saw no reports of violence or destruction," Piggott stated."Only about 4% of those protests — so about 36 of them — actually involved counterdemonstrations or counterprotests," he continued.He claimed this year's protests have been "very peaceful" with "really not a whole lot of counterdemonstration activity."Piggott further noted that "actors of concern," such as the Proud Boys and militia groups, have had decreased "offline activity" compared to last year. However, he noted such actors are "paying a bit more attention to the No Kings protest" following the "events in L.A. over the past week.""What we are not seeing at all is widespread calls from actors of concern to mobilize in response to this weekend," he added.Although the No Kings movement condemns violence, their training on managing “instigators” reveals organizers’ concerns about disruptions from their own supporters, not conservative "actors of concern," who, as Piggott noted, are less likely to mobilize.RELATED: Florida sheriff makes clear to radicals that riots won't go their way: 'We will kill you' Riots in Los Angeles on June 8, 2025. Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images ResponseLegacy media outlets have bolstered No Kings' narrative, depicting the Army's 250th anniversary parade as Trump's authoritarian birthday spectacle and sidelining its patriotic ties to military history and Flag Day. Following destructive anti-immigration enforcement riots in Los Angeles last week, which saw widespread property damage and arrests, No Kings' timing and the media's amplification of the movement's narrative raise fears of similar escalation. 'If any person assaults a federal law enforcement officer, they risk being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.'While the No Kings organizers have repeatedly condemned violence and rioting, others are convinced the gathering, particularly given the large scale of demonstrations, will devolve into lawlessness, raising questions about how Indivisible and its partner organizations plan to prevent such chaos at all of their events. Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) is one of the many who believe the demonstrations could result in destruction and violence similar to that which occurred in Los Angeles.In preparation for the mass gatherings, Abbott announced earlier this week that he would deploy Texas National Guard troops to specific locations in the state to "ensure peace and order."On Thursday, Abbott deployed over 5,000 Texas National Guard troops and 2,000 state police to prevent potential unrest, following clashes between protesters and law enforcement in Austin and Dallas earlier this week that led to roughly a dozen arrests."Peaceful protests are part of the fabric of our nation, but Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles in response to President Donald Trump's enforcement of immigration law," Abbott declared. "Anyone engaging in acts of violence or damaging property will be arrested and held accountable to the full extent of the law."An Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesperson told Blaze News, "ICE respects the constitutional right of people to peacefully protest; however, assaulting, resisting, impeding, or harassing ICE officers and special agents or interfering in any way as they are executing their official duty is against the law. If any person assaults a federal law enforcement officer, they risk being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”Blaze News senior politics editor Christopher Bedford revealed the broader progressive tactic."Everything you're seeing now — from the senator from California lunging through agents at the Secretary of Homeland Security, the rioting in Los Angeles, or the congresswoman assaulting a police officer in New Jersey — all of these things are intentional provocations in the hopes of setting something off and triggering an overreaction because they can't get their own grassroots motivated," Bedford stated.No Kings, the Indivisible Project, the AFL-CIO, and the ACLU did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

In the spirit of fighting climate change, a recent Associated Press video features a woman urging “smart swaps” for a planet-friendly grocery cart — but BlazeTV host Stu Burguiere is calling it “the dumbest climate scam yet.”“Want to make more planet-friendly choices at the grocery store? From chicken to beans and olive oil, these swaps could reduce your carbon footprint,” the Associated Press posted on X alongside the video.“I hate this form of quote-unquote ‘journalism,’ where it’s like ‘oh, these are just nice little tips you could do that just happens to completely support one side’s political arguments,’” Burguiere says on “Stu Does America.”In the video, the woman claims that “experts say” choosing chicken instead of beef just once a day can “cut your diet's emissions almost in half.”“That’s partly because cows burp a lot, which produces methane, potent greenhouse gas, and processed animal products, like cheese, have a high impact on the planet. It takes about ten pounds of whole milk to make one pound of cheese,” she says confidently as she roams the grocery aisles.“The average person eats beef about once a day,” Stu comments, “so eating chicken instead of beef means that you never eat beef again.”“These are the simple choices you can make when you’re inside the grocery store,” he mocks. “Now, we should also note, none of these changes have any actual current difference. And when I say they don’t make any difference, I mean that sincerely.”Stu explains that the number of cows alive does not change based on whether or not you choose chicken over beef.“In fact, these cows that are in your store, they’re not even alive any more. They’ve already been slaughtered. They’re already there,” he says, adding, “The beef has already been produced and made, and all the emissions for the beef that’s sitting in the store has already been emitted, if you will.”Want more from Stu?To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

During Summer Game Fest, Techland released a 30-minute gameplay walkthrough for Dying Light: The Beast, its upcoming zombie RPG. At around the 29-minute mark, protagonist Kyle Crane radios a mysterious character called 'Olivia,' informing her of his successful mission to kill one of the antagonist's monstrosities. According to Samantha Beart, the actor behind Karlach in Baldur's Gate 3, Olivia's voice is their own, yet Beart tells PCGamesN they were never actually cast. Continue reading BG3 actor says they're in Dying Light The Beast trailer, despite not being cast MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best zombie games, Best open-world games, Best co-op games

OOPSIE! CNN's Own Legal Expert Destroys Democrats' Talking Points About Sen. Padilla Incident (Watch)

Politico Story About What Dems are 'Reclaiming' Makes It Clear Recent Optics Have Been Backfiring