When you walk through the Library of Congress in Washington, one inscription reads, “the foundation of every state is the education of its youth,” quoting Diogenes. For the Greeks, Romans, and America’s Founding Fathers, education meant instilling virtue as well as information. Now, education is progressive indoctrination. Education of the youth is still the foundation of a state, so what happens when the moral foundation of education itself begins to shift decisively toward a political extreme? On Thursday, the House decided in a narrow 214-212 vote to pass Trump’s rescission package to cut taxpayer funding to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS. These media conglomerates have a decidedly left-wing bias, having supported cultural Marxist themes, drag shows, and blatant relativism. Perhaps PBS is more strongly associated in the minds of some Americans with cultural classics for young people such as “Cat in the Hat,” “Sesame Street,” or “Martha Speaks.” True, PBS did have strong educational content in the early years, but by the turn of this century it took a turn for the woke. In 2022, PBS was forced to cancel the longest running animated children’s show in the network’s history, “Arthur,” after backlash over their 2019 episode featuring a homosexual wedding and a 2020 episode discussing George Floyd’s death. Previously, when “Arthur” had tried to promote LGBTQ+ narratives, the episodes were removed under pressure from President George W. Bush’s Department of Education. But since Bush departed office, producers shamelessly have aired leftist propagandized shows. And they’re funded by American taxpayers. In 2017, Bustle, the online women’s magazine with an audience of over 100 million monthly readers, said unashamedly that, “these progressive children’s shows prove that you don’t need to have an over 18 target audience to create work that challenges assumptions about gender, race, and politics … that’s the beauty of these shows … this is education via stealth.[emphasis added]” They said the quiet part out loud, which gives me the chills, and not in a good way. In line with this approach, Sesame Street ran an episode called “Family Day” with gay couple Dave and Frank in 2021, and in 2022, Elmo encouraged children to get the COVID shot, as part of PBS’s “the ABCs of the COVID Vaccine” learning initiative. Sesame Street hosted outspoken homosexuals in recent years, such as Ellen DeGeneres and rapper Lil Nas X. Even PBS’ bipartisan literacy initiatives launched during the Reagan administration are now focused on “racial literacy.” PBS’ movie “Real Boy” features a transgender teenager who struggles with sobriety. The perfect viewing for a Friday family movie night! Lest we forget, these programs are aimed at children, who should not be over racialized or sexualized if the goal is to educate, not indoctrinate. PBS isn’t the only aggravator. NPR’s programming over the past decade is rife with woke propaganda. A report issued by the White House lists their offenses. A 2015 segment featured the “population of anthropomorphic animal enthusiasts known as ‘furries.’” In 2022, NPR ran a story on what “Queer Ducks” can teach youth about sexuality. Later that same year, our great nation had the distinct privilege of learning about the ancient communities of genderqueer dinosaurs and trans-Ceratops. The NPR Valentine’s Day special in 2024 was on queer animals, because, well, how fitting. We learned about gay anteaters in the Smithsonian Zoo, hermaphroditic banana slugs, and nonbinary deer. But the cherry on top of this Valentine’s Day special is NPR’s final takeaway to have more sex with the people around you: As a social species, our survival relies on us being able to get along with one another. Same-sex sexual behaviors … is thought to be another way of strengthening these bonds and assuring that we can protect each other, take care of each other and help each other forage. So think about an animal like a bonobo. One of our closest relatives, a primate species—they have so much sex. It’s thought to be like, ‘Hey, instead of fighting over these resources, let’s just have sex with one another, feel good about it and share.’ And that’s really worked out for them. Feeling edified? Well, hopefully taxpayers across the political spectrum who value education won’t have to fund programs like this for much longer, as 214 House members concluded Thursday afternoon on the House floor: Federal funds do not belong in the pockets of woke media conglomerates. Education of youth is the foundation of a state, and elected officials are beginning to take that seriously. The post The Movement to Make Our Children Innocent Again appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Iran launched dozens of missiles at Israel on Friday, according to the Israel Defense Forces. Explosions were heard in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv as sirens sounded across Israel.   More than 40 people in Israel were injured in the attack, a number of sources reported.   ??RAW FOOTAGE: Iran launched multiple ballistic missiles toward Israel in the past hours. The IDF cannot, and will not, allow Iran to attack our civilians. pic.twitter.com/IrDK05uErm— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 13, 2025 The missile attack on Israel from Iran came less than 24 hours after Israel launched a major attack on Iran’s nuclear program, striking multiple nuclear sites. Fox News reported that the U.S. is helping Israel shoot down the incoming Iranian missiles.  American fighter jets are also reportedly patrolling in the Middle East to protect U.S. assets and personnel in the region. U.S. officials say there are “hundreds of thousands of American citizens and other American assets in Israel, and the U.S. is working to protect them,” Fox reported. There are currently two U.S. Navy destroyers in the Eastern Mediterranean, according to outlet.   While Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Thursday night that the U.S. was not involved in Israel’s attack on Iran, President Donald Trump has confirmed that the U.S. was informed of Israel’s plans beforehand. Trump also met with members of his National Security Council on Friday.   Trump had given Iran 60 days to reach a nuclear deal with the U.S., and Thursday marked Iran’s deadline, but Trump said Friday that a deal is still possible.   “I couldn’t get them to a deal in 60 days. They were close. They should have done it. Maybe now it will happen,” Trump told Axios on Friday.   In a conversation with CNN’s Dana Bash, Trump expressed similar optimism that Israel’s strike on Iran might bring Iran to the negotiating table.   “The people I was dealing with are dead, the hard-liners,” Trump said, referring to the Iranian leaders who were not willing to agree to U.S. terms for a nuclear deal.   NEW: President Trump told CNN's Dana Bash that Iran's negotiators he was dealing with are all dead.It was previously reported that Iran & the U.S. were set to hold another round of negotiations on Sunday.Trump: "The people I was dealing with are dead, the hardliners."Bash:… pic.twitter.com/9czlkvsdSQ— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 13, 2025 Israeli strikes are reported to have killed Gen. Hossein Salami, the commander in chief of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; Gen. Gholamali Rashid, the deputy commander of Iran’s armed forces; Brig. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff for Iran’s armed forces; and Ali Shamkhani, a top Iranian naval officer and former secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran. Fereydoun Abbasi and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, two nuclear scientists, have reportedly also been killed.     Trump repeatedly said in recent weeks that Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon, and following reports of a deal that would allow for some uranium enrichment to continue in Iran, he said any deal with Iran would ban all enrichment. But Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said there would be no deal if Iran was not allowed to continue enrichment.  Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a speech Friday and spoke directly to the Iranian people, telling them “Israel’s fight is not against the Iranian people.”  “The Islamic regime, which has oppressed you for almost 50 years, threatens to destroy my country, the state of Israel,” Netanyahu said. “The objective of Israel’s military operation is to remove this threat—both the nuclear threat and the ballistic missile threat to Israel.”   “And as we achieve our objective,” the prime minister added, “we are also clearing the path for you to achieve your objective, which is freedom.”  Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:To the proud people of Iran,We are in the midst of one of the greatest military operations in history, Operation Rising Lion.The Islamic regime, which has oppressed you for almost 50 years threatens to destroy our country, the State of Israel. pic.twitter.com/F67bxcDitL— Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) June 13, 2025 On Friday afternoon, Israel confirmed it carried out strikes against Iran’s nuclear plant in the city of Isfahan after carrying out strikes against other nuclear sites, including on Natanz Nuclear Facility, Iran’s largest uranium-enrichment complex, and multiple military bases.    Sirens continued to sound across Israel late Friday night and into Saturday morning local time, according to the IDF.   The post Iran Strikes Back at Israel With Large Missile Attack appeared first on The Daily Signal.

At DogingtonPost, we know that traveling with your furry friend can be both exciting and challenging. Our comprehensive guide offers essential tips on traveling with a dog, ensuring a smooth and enjoyable journey for both you and your canine companion. From preparation and transportation choices to packing must-haves, we’ve got you covered. How to Prepare Your Dog for Travel Schedule a Pre-Travel Vet Visit A successful trip with your dog starts with a visit to the veterinarian. Book an appointment at least a month before your planned departure. Your vet will: Update vaccinations: Ensure your dog’s core vaccines are current. (Some destinations require specific vaccines, so research your travel location’s requirements.) Perform a health check: A thorough examination will confirm your dog’s fitness for travel. Prescribe medications: If your dog needs any medications, obtain enough to last the entire trip, plus extra for potential delays. Most airlines require a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (health certificate) issued within 10 days of travel for air travel or crossing state lines. Secure Proper Identification Proper identification is essential when traveling with your dog. Take these steps: Update ID tags: Attach a tag with your current contact information to your dog’s collar. Consider microchipping: If your dog lacks a microchip, now’s the time to get one. Only 15 percent of dogs without ID tags or microchips in shelters are reunited with their owners. Carry a recent photo: Keep a current photo of your dog on your phone for easy identification in case of separation. Introduce Travel Gear Gradually Familiarize your dog with travel equipment well before your trip: Car harness or crate: Allow your dog to wear or explore the car harness or crate at home first. Carrier for air travel: For flights, introduce the carrier weeks in advance. Create a positive association by placing treats or toys inside. Practice short trips: Take your dog on brief car rides to build positive associations with travel. Patience is key in this process. Some dogs may need more time to adjust to travel gear, so start early. With these preparation steps complete, you’ll create a solid foundation for a stress-free trip with your canine companion. Now, let’s explore how to choose the right mode of transportation for your journey. How to Choose Your Dog’s Travel Mode Car travel provides the most control over your dog’s comfort and safety. The safest way for your dog to travel in the car is in a crate that has been anchored to the vehicle using a seat belt or other secure means. For short trips, a dog seatbelt or harness suffices. Longer journeys require a crate for added security. Car Travel: The Most Flexible Option Purchase a crash-tested crate or harness for optimal safety. The Center for Pet Safety’s top-rated car harness is the Sleepypod Clickit Sport, while the Gunner Kennels G1 Intermediate leads in crate safety. Schedule stops every 2-3 hours for bathroom breaks and exercise. Never leave your dog alone in a parked car (temperatures can rise quickly, even on mild days). If you’re concerned about overheating, it’s crucial to know how to recognize and treat the signs. Air Travel: Thorough Planning Required Air travel demands extensive preparation. Each airline has specific pet policies, so research thoroughly. Most airlines allow small dogs (under 20 pounds) in the cabin for a fee. Larger dogs must travel in the cargo hold, which can cause stress and pose risks. For cargo travel, select a direct flight to minimize handling and potential weather exposure. However, you must weigh the risks carefully. Airlines require health certificates issued within 10 days of travel. Some destinations have additional requirements (Hawaii, for example, has a strict quarantine policy to prevent rabies spread). Train and Bus Travel: Limited Options Train and bus travel options for dogs remain limited in the United States. Amtrak allows dogs up to 20 pounds on trips under 7 hours for a fee. Only 5 pets are allowed per train, so book early. Most interstate bus services (including Greyhound) do not allow pets except for service animals. Some regional bus companies may have pet-friendly policies, so check local options. For both train and bus travel, your dog must stay in a carrier that fits under the seat or on your lap. This restricts this option to small breeds only. Your chosen mode of transportation should prioritize your dog’s comfort and safety. The next chapter will guide you through essential packing tips to ensure your furry friend has everything needed for a smooth journey. What to Pack for Your Dog’s Journey Traveling with pets has always been a tricky affair. They are not used to road trips in cars. Pack enough of your dog’s regular food for the entire trip (plus extra for unexpected delays). Stick to their usual diet to avoid digestive issues. Bring a collapsible bowl and bottled water. Medication and Health Supplies Pack your dog’s medications in their original containers with clear labels. Include a copy of prescriptions and your vet’s contact information. For long trips, ask your vet about motion sickness remedies. A canine first-aid kit should include gauze, adhesive tape, scissors, tweezers, and an antiseptic solution. Pack styptic powder to stop bleeding from minor cuts. Include any specific items your dog might need (such as ear cleaner or eye drops). Comfort Items and Toys Bring items that smell like home to help your dog feel secure. This could be their favorite blanket or toy. If your dog uses a crate, include their usual bedding. Pack a variety of toys for entertainment. Puzzle toys can keep your dog occupied during long car rides or flights. The Kong Classic is a versatile option that can be stuffed with treats. Cleaning and Grooming Supplies Don’t forget waste bags for cleaning up after your dog. Pack more than you think you’ll need. Some areas have strict rules about pet waste, so always be prepared. Include grooming supplies like a brush and pet wipes. These can be handy for quick clean-ups or to help your dog feel refreshed after a long day of travel. Travel Documents Carry your dog’s vaccination records and health certificates. Some destinations require specific documentation, so research your travel location’s requirements in advance. Final Thoughts Traveling with your dog requires thorough preparation and careful planning. You must start with a health check-up, secure proper identification, and familiarize your dog with travel gear well in advance. Choose the most suitable mode of transportation based on your dog’s size, temperament, and the trip’s duration. Research your destination’s pet policies, book pet-friendly accommodations, and prepare all necessary documentation. This proactive approach will help you avoid last-minute stress and potential roadblocks during your journey. Prioritize your dog’s comfort and safety to create lasting memories and strengthen your bond. For more valuable tips on traveling with a dog, visit DogingtonPost. We provide the latest information and expert advice to enhance your life with your canine companion. Happy travels with your four-legged friend!

The 'Gentle Singularity' is Driving Some People Crazy

Last night, in a pre-emptive military operation dubbed Operation Rising Lion, Israeli defense forces struck Iran's nuclear and military sites, including a key uranium enrichment facility, killing senior military commanders and nuclear scientists.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Iran was dangerously close to developing a nuclear weapon, stating, “If not stopped, Iran could develop a nuclear weapon in a very short time — it could be a year, or even just months. This is a clear and present danger to Israel's survival.”The idea of a nuclear weapon in the hands of the Iranian regime is a terrifying notion. In the wake of Israel’s strike, many are wondering: Just how close was Iran to developing a nuclear bomb?To get insight, Glenn Beck invited former IDF spokesman Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus to “The Glenn Beck Program.” “Iran has been dashing for the bomb for a long period of time,” says Conricus.Citing a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, he adds, “Iran is not only enriching uranium to weapons-grade and has enough fissile material for at least 10 bombs, but that Iran is also in noncompliance when it comes to their obligations to allow international supervision of their sites.”The IAEA report, along with other currently classified intelligence, was the “tipping point” that set Operation Rising Lion in motion.“Iran has an open goal to annihilate the state of Israel. ... We know that they mean business, and we also know that if we allow them to develop the tools to do so, they might be tempted to use them, and that is what Israel has today started to unravel in terms of those Iranian capabilities,” Conricus told Glenn.Glenn brings up a recent Axios article claiming that two Israeli officials said President Trump and Netanyahu deceived Iran about the Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities. The article suggests Trump publicly opposed the strike but privately supported it to mislead Iran, ensuring key targets remained in place.“The president [said], 'You have 60 days to negotiate, and you don't want to see what happens on day 61.' I don't think that's deceptive to make plans to go in on day 61,” says Glenn.Conricus believes it “is deception” but in a “good way,” in that it allowed Israel to catch their enemy “unaware” and “unprepared.” President Trump, he says, has “been very straightforward telling the Iranians time and time again this is the best deal that you're going to get.”It was made perfectly clear to Iran that it “should relinquish all attempts to enrich material ... [and] allow full comprehensive inspection of all of [its] sites, nuclear as well as weapons development,” and yet the regime “didn't do it,” he explains.“We are today on day 61 of the presidential ultimatum, and this is what happens.”To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above.Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

President Donald J. Trump has authority under the U.S. Constitution and federal law to call the National Guard into service for defined purposes that include putting down rebellion, defending against invasion, and ensuring execution of the laws of the United States.When rioting broke out in and around Los Angeles on June 6 and federal employees and facilities were attacked, President Trump used his constitutional and statutory powers to call 2,000 and later 4,000 members of the California National Guard into federal service.The DOJ called Gov. Newsom’s court action 'a crass political stunt.'Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom on June 9 asked a federal district court judge to force the commander in chief to relinquish control of the National Guard, complaining that President Trump had not adequately consulted him.United States District Judge Charles Breyer, appointee of President Bill Clinton and brother of retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, sided with Newsom in a ruling that was quickly stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A hearing is set for June 17.“In a crass political stunt endangering American lives, the Governor of California seeks to use this court to stop the President of the United States from exercising his lawful statutory and constitutional power to ensure that federal personnel and facilities are protected,” wrote Christopher Edelman, senior counsel at the U.S. Department of Justice. “But, under the Constitution, the president is the commander in chief of the armed forces, and the president is responsible for ensuring the protection of federal personnel and federal facilities,” Edelman wrote in a federal court filing on June 11.The fight that Newsom started in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California is shaping up to be more about partisan politics, policy, and lawfare than presidential authority. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit quickly stayed a district judge’s ruling that President Trump exceeded his authority. The case will almost certainly end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.States line up for, against TrumpAttorneys general from Iowa, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah petitioned to file an amici curiae brief in opposition to Newsom’s attempt to wrestle control of the Guard back from the president.The states of Washington, Delaware, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Rhode Island moved to file a brief supporting Gov. Newsom.Newsom complained bitterly in California’s application for a federal temporary restraining order that President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are using a “warrior culture” that targets “the streets of cities and towns where Americans work, go to school, and raise families.”'There is no rioters’ veto to enforcement of federal law.'In his application seeking judicial fiat to regain control of the Guard, Newsom denied the existence of any rebellion or invasion, instead describing the fiery rioting and assaults on federal agents and buildings by supporters of illegal aliens as “civil unrest that is no different from episodes that regularly occur in communities throughout the country that is capable of being contained by state and local authorities working together.”“Absent immediate injunctive relief, defendants’ use of the military and the federalized National Guard to patrol communities or otherwise engage in general law enforcement activities creates imminent harm to state sovereignty, deprives the state of vital resources, escalates tensions and promotes (rather than quells) civil unrest,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta wrote in the state’s motion for a restraining order.Corporate media ran interference for Newsom, describing the riots as either “mostly peaceful” or nonexistent. Written and photographic news coverage described President Trump as “hard right” and his immigration policies as “harsh.”The “working together” cited in Newsom’s court petition was nowhere evident during the more than five days and nights of Los Angeles rioting. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) demanded that federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents rounding up illegal aliens for deportation stop their operations. She reportedly ordered the Los Angeles Police Department to stand down during some of the rioting. Democrat politicians encouraged activists to take to the streets, leading to more violence against federal agents and damage to ICE facilities.In calling up the National Guard and ordering 700 active-duty U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, President Trump judged that Newsom and Bass were unwilling to support the rule of law and protect federal employees, vehicles, facilities, and the general public.RELATED: Man caught on video passing out face shields to rioters has been arrested, feds say Self-driving Waymo vehicles are torched by rioters in Los Angeles on June 8, 2025.Photo by Mario Tama/Getty ImagesAttorneys for the DOJ insist that the authority to use the military to protect federal agents rests solely with the president, and it is his job alone to determine the measures needed to keep federal employees, facilities, and interests safe from mob rule. “There is no rioters’ veto to enforcement of federal law,” DOJ Attorney Edelman wrote. “And the President has every right under the Constitution and by statute to call forth the National Guard and Marines to quell lawless violence directed against enforcement of federal law. “Yet instead of working to bring order to Los Angeles, California and its governor filed a lawsuit in San Francisco seeking a court order limiting the federal government’s ability to protect its property and officials,” Edelman wrote.Under Section 10 U.S. Code § 12406, the president has authority to use the National Guard to suppress rebellion, repel an invasion, or execute federal laws. “Plaintiffs admit that Los Angeles has experienced ‘unrest,’ but ask this court to second-guess the president’s judgment that federal reinforcements were necessary,” Edelman wrote. “That is precisely the type of sensitive judgment that is committed to the president’s discretion by law, and to which courts owe the highest deference. The statute empowers the President to determine what forces ‘he considers necessary’ to ‘suppress’ a ‘rebellion’ or to ‘execute’ federal ‘laws’ — not the governor, and not a federal court.”Judge Breyer’s issuance of a temporary restraining order, quickly stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, was a “dangerous” overreach of judicial authority, Edelman suggested.“The extraordinary relief plaintiffs request would judicially countermand the Commander in Chief’s military directives — and would do so in the posture of a temporary restraining order, no less,” Edelman wrote. “That would be unprecedented. It would be constitutionally anathema. And it would be dangerous.”Protecting federal agents, facilitiesThe president’s authority under Section 10 was tailored in this case to protect those engaged in law enforcement functions, such as ICE agents and Department of Homeland Security officers. Neither Guard troops nor Marines were assigned law enforcement duties, so President Trump’s actions do not run afoul of the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits U.S. military personnel from performing domestic law enforcement functions.“Plaintiffs offer no contrary evidence, only a speculative assertion that the National Guard and Marines will be used for unlawful purposes in the future,” Edelman wrote.RELATED: Kamala, Newsom, AOC outed: Leaked DHS memo claims they back violent illegal aliens over Americans Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department deputies fire a nonlethal weapon at a man after he threw a can at them during a protest against federal immigration operations near Los Angeles City Hall on June 11, 2025.Photo by Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP via Getty Images“Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation,” he said. “Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. And courts should not interfere here either.”Given the rioting involved, President Trump could have federalized the National Guard by enabling the Insurrection Act. But he chose to work through federal statute in Section 10.“The statutory lineage of [sub] Section 12406 begins with the First Militia Act of 1792, which, among other things, was used by George Washington to respond to the Whiskey Rebellion,” Edelman wrote.Farmers in Pennsylvania attacked federal revenue officers when they tried to collect a tax on liquor. A mob of 500 burned down the home of a tax inspector in July 1794, prompting President Washington to call up 13,000 soldiers from four states to put down the rebellion.The Insurrection Act has been legally invoked 30 times by 17 presidents, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, a New York-based law and policy center.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

An MSNBC columnist and former FBI counterintelligence officer made a “maliciously false and defamatory statement” against Kash Patel, according to a lawsuit the FBI director filed. Frank Figliuzzi was lambasting President Donald Trump's choice to head up the Federal Bureau of Investigation when he made a bizarre accusation meant to portray Patel as unfocused and unwilling to fulfill the obligations of the job. 'Defendant made up the story out of whole cloth, and by using the word "reportedly," attempts to distance himself from what is a maliciously false and defamatory statement.'“Well, reportedly he’s been visible at nightclubs far more than he has been on the seventh floor of the Hoover Building,” Figliuzzi had said about Patel in a segment on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" in May. “So this is both a blessing and a curse because if he’s really trying to run things without his experience, without any experience level, things could be bad," he added. "If he’s not plugged in, things could be bad. But he’s allowing agents to run things, so we don’t know where this is going.” He added of the FBI, “The one word that keeps coming back at me from inside is that the building is 'chaos.'”Days later, a co-host on the show retracted the claim from Figliuzzi. “This was a misstatement. We have not verified that claim," said Jonathan Lemire at the time. That was not enough for Patel, who filed a defamation lawsuit against Figliuzzi, pointing out that he implied some report had made the claim against Patel, but no report existed. “Defendant did not rely on reporting by any other person,” read the filing. “Defendant made up the story out of whole cloth, and by using the word ‘reportedly,’ attempts to distance himself from what is a maliciously false and defamatory statement.”RELATED: Kash Patel, Dan Bongino say Jeffrey Epstein DID commit suicide: 'I've seen the whole file' Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images The lawsuit argued, “As a partisan commentator, [Figliuzzi] was motivated to sensationalize, and in this case, fabricate a story to self-promotingly advance his own name recognition, at the expense of Director Patel.”It also affirmed that Patel had not spent a single minute inside of a nightclub since becoming the director of the FBI. Neither Figliuzzi nor a spokesperson for Patel responded to a request for comment from the New York Post. Figliuzzi had previously suggested in 2022 that Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson might somehow be responsible for the heinous attack on Club Q, an LGBT nightclub in Colorado Springs. Law enforcement officials later reported that the club had been chosen as a last-minute target. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Four leading tech executives have joined the United States Army Reserve with a special officer status that will see them work a little more than two weeks per year.The recruits were sworn in just in time for the Army's 250th birthday as part of a 2024 initiative by the U.S. military to find tech experts for short-term projects in cybersecurity, data analytics, and other areas. The newly commissioned officers will be ranked as lieutenant colonels, the sixth-highest officer rank among Army personnel. However, they will still need to complete a fitness test and marksmanship training.'There's a lot of patriotism that has been under the covers that I think is coming to light in the Valley.'Chief Technology Officers Shyam Sankar and Andrew "Boz" Bosworth from Palantir and Meta, respectively, will be joined by Kevin Weil, chief product officer from OpenAI, and Bob McGrew, OpenAI's former chief research officer.According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, the executives will bring sorely needed tech upgrades to the armed forces. Back in October 2024, the outlet reported on the Defense Department's desire to bring on tech experts in part-time roles to help the federal government get up to speed on cybersecurity and data, sectors in which talent and skill have largely been siphoned off by the private sector in recent years.The new program name will also be an ode to tech with the name Detachment 201, a reference to the hypertext transfer protocol status code 201 — computer speak referring to a successful server resource being created.RELATED: OpenAI sabotaged commands to prevent itself from being shut off — (@) The new reservists will also be tasked with acquiring more commercial technology, according to the WSJ, but will be limited in their work hours — 120 per year — and will not be allowed to share any information with their civilian employers.Bosworth said Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg supported his decision to join the Army Reserve, claiming, "There's a lot of patriotism that has been under the covers that I think is coming to light in the Valley."Whatever his true intentions, Zuckerberg has presented himself as a more patriotic individual in the last year, including wooing UFC President Dana White with a giant American flag in Lake Tahoe.Anduril founder Palmer Luckey has also spoke positively about how the Trump administration in particular has worked with the tech sector. In fact, Luckey said Meta had rid itself of any "insane radical leftists," which has likely helped Zuckerberg become one of the darlings of the newly found marriage of tech CEOs and the right wing.RELATED: Who's stealing your data, the left or the right? — (@) "I have always believed that America is a force for good in the world, and in order for America to accomplish that, we need a strong military," McGrew said about his choice, per the WSJ.Sankar reportedly said his reason for giving back to the country was because if it were "not for the grace of this nation," his family would be "dead in a ditch" in Lagos, Nigeria.Bosworth has allegedly enhanced his workouts in preparation for the service, but it is unclear whether he draws inspiration from legendary NFL agitator Brian "the Boz" Bosworth.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

“It’s strange, it’s an experience that I’ve never had before, I’m very humbled by it." The post It’s Sir Roger Now: The Who’s Daltrey is Knighted appeared first on Best Classic Bands.

Saber Interactive has done a great job of bringing simulation games to a wider audience with its Runner series. From 2017's Mudrunner through to Snowrunner and Expeditions: A Mudrunner Game, the studio has worked hard to refine its take on realistic vehicle off-roading and transportation, with each follow-up providing a markedly improved experience from its predecessor. The most compelling version of its formula arrived last month in the form of Roadcraft, which marries the attention to detail of other Saber sims with satisfying construction objectives. It appears to be a hit, too, with the parent company of publisher Focus Entertainment calling the game one of its "most successful launches" to date. Continue reading Surprise hit Roadcraft is one of its publisher's "most successful launches" ever MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Roadcraft review, Best sandbox games, Best simulation games