Featured Essays Superman The Lois Lane Test There are a few key criteria by which one can judge a Lois Lane depiction… and, in turn, our understanding of any Superman narrative. By J.L. Akagi | Published on August 25, 2025 Comment 0 Share New Share When it comes to a Superman movie, there is one thing that makes or breaks an adaptation: Lois Lane. By virtue of being Superman’s love interest and the voice of humanity through The Daily Planet, Lois Lane offers insight into his motivations that no other character or plot device can. She serves as a steady point from which we can observe Superman. And how she’s portrayed offers a telling test of each film’s emotional stakes and overall vision of heroism. I just rewatched the major on-screen adaptations of Superman from three directors: Richard Donner’s Superman: The Movie and Superman II; Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel, Batman v. Superman, and Justice League; and finally, James Gunn’s newest addition to the canon, Superman.  And from this movie marathon, I posit that there are three criteria by which we can judge a Lois—and by extension her adaptation. Lois Lane’s Journalism Screenshot: Warner Bros. Let’s be clear: This is not a test of the quality of Lois’ journalism. Even The New York Times has an article on that. We’re here to talk about the role that investigative journalism plays in developing Superman as a character. And journalism is important. Don’t take it from me—take it from the editor in chief of The Daily Planet, Perry White. In Superman: The Movie, he bellows that an interview with Superman is “The single most important interview since God talked to Moses.”  Does that make Lois Moses? Lois Lane makes Superman, at least the public eye. In Donner’s version, she even names him. After he flies away from their first interview, Lois mutters to herself, “What a super man.” Then repeats, “Superman.”  In Snyder’s Man of Steel, it is implied that Lois names him. She gazes at the emblem on his chest (not an S, but a symbol for hope) and begins to whisper the consonant S, before she’s cut off. Not quite naming him, but close. In Gunn’s version of Lois, she—well, we’ll get to Gunn’s. When it comes to Superman’s relationship to the press, each Lois diverges. Lois’ journalism is a gateway to flirtation in Superman: The Movie and Superman II. For the interview, Margot Kidder as Lois meets Superman on her balcony in a periwinkle dress and—per Perry’s urging—asks him personal questions. Lois launches into the interview with, “Let’s start with vital statistics. Are you married? Do you have a girlfriend? How old are you? How big are you?” And to test his X-RAY vision, Lois asks him what color her underwear is. What can I say? It’s a campy movie. The interview culminates in an article titled, “I Spent the Night with Superman: An Exclusive Interview by Lois Lane.” For Donner’s version of Superman, Clark’s feelings for Lois are pivotal to his understanding of himself. As Clark, he is a humble man overlooked by humanity, including Lois Lane. But as Superman, he’s important to Lois. Getting to know Superman is the story for Lois, and this plays into Clark Kent’s overall narrative of becoming Superman. By revealing himself to her, he reveals himself to humanity. In this interview, he answers her questions honestly, and does not lie. Snyder’s version of Superman is much more elusive. “How do you find someone who has spent a lifetime covering his tracks?” writes Lois.  While this voiceover plays, we see her interviewing Smallvillians and others who have witnessed Superman. In a quick succession of shots that lasts about a minute, Lois tracks and meets Superman. Her discovery of Superman’s identity is visually interwoven with a few key moments in Clark’s life, serving almost as a narrative voice to him becoming Superman. Throughout her montage, the scenes intermittently cut to Superman learning to fly for the first time, and flashback to his father’s death. (A death wherein Pa Kent won’t allow his son to save him from a tornado, lest the public find out about his powers. More on that later.) Snyder’s Lois can’t sell the story to The Daily Planet. Unlike Donner’s Lois, her Perry doesn’t want it. When she reminds him that she’s “a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter,” he responds, “Then act like it,” and adds, “I’m not running a story about aliens walking among us.”  Journalism poses a major conflict in Man of Steel. In Superman: The Movie, the press wants to hear about him and Superman reveals himself willingly. But in Man of Steel, it’s unclear if the public will accept Superman. In Snyder’s adaptation, journalism threatens exposure, underpinning a key theme of Man of Steel not present in Superman: The Movie. Superman is instantly and unquestionably loved in Donner’s adaptation, whereas he’s positioned as freakish and dangerous in Snyder’s. But Gunn’s Lois does what no other Lois has done before: She questions him.  During the interview, Gunn’s Lois doesn’t throw him softball questions, and doesn’t let him off the hook. “I stopped a war,” he says. She shoots back, “Maybe… How?” When Superman tells her that he held a nation’s head of state against a cactus, she clarifies, “So… torture?”  She questions Clark Kent’s ability to retain journalistic neutrality about Superman. She questions his actions. His morals. She even says outright, “Yes, I would question it.” To which, he exclaims, “People were going to die!” Compare this to the way Donner’s Lois asks about his motivations, wherein Superman simply answers, “Truth, justice, and the American way.” Gunn’s Lois pushes Superman on “Seemingly acting as a representative of the United States—” which forces him to interject, “I wasn’t representing anybody except for me. And myself. And good, I dunno, doing good.” Gunn’s take on the Superman interview combines some of the strengths of his predecessors. There is the public disapproval explored by Snyder, and the romantic stakes are as important to Gunn’s narrative as they are to Donner’s. Ultimately, Lois spells out what we’re to make of this tension: “I question everything and everyone,” she says. “You trust everyone, and think everyone you’ve ever met is, like, beautiful.” This interview scene reveals that she’s willing to risk her relationship to get the story. It escalates into an argument, and the couple seems on the verge of breaking up. Other Loises prioritize either her relationship with Superman (Donner’s Lois) or Superman’s wellbeing (Snyder’s), but this Lois is concerned with truly understanding Superman—his motivations, how he situates himself in the geopolitical landscape, if he concerns himself with human criticism. She isn’t using her role as a reporter to flirt (cute). Or her poeticism to aggrandize (cool). Rather, Lois’ investigative insistence via interview sets her up as moral North Star. She forces Superman to question and assert his core motivation: Saving people. It’s been said that Man of Steel is worth its weight in how it aura farms. But one could also argue that Superman doesn’t seem to actually care about human life—at least not individual lives. Redditors have noticed that he leaps over an oil tank rather than preventing an explosion because it looks cool. That’s mostly what Lois Lane’s journalism amounts to in Man of Steel: making Superman look cool. And while I love the campiness of Donner’s Superman, it also lacks friction when it comes to these questions of consequences. And it is that friction with Lois that strengthens the theme of morality in Gunn’s Superman. Lois’ goal in all three directors’ adaptations remains the same: She wants to know Superman. Donner situates journalism as an opportunity to get closer to the man wearing the cape. Snyder’s Lois states her mission plainly: “I want my mystery man to know I know the truth.” Gunn’s Lois is also intent on getting to know him: She pushes him for an interview and digs deep to get answers. Intimacy is the story for our girl. Through this intimacy, Lois’ journalism offers key insights into his character. Her observations show us how humanity sees Superman, so the audience can understand the scale of his powers and his motivations. Lois’ interview in Superman: The Movie proves that she could love him, even though she overlooks Clark Kent. Snyder uses the threat of exposure to raise the stakes and leverages Lois’ breathless writing to build up his mythos. Lois Lane vs. Violence Screenshot: Warner Bros. Lois is a risk taker. She’s desperate to get the story and is willing to endanger herself to get it. That’s what makes Lois Lane rescues so iconic. She often puts herself in danger, and that gives a lovestruck Superman ample opportunities to save her. Superman (2025) makes a big departure in this regard—Gunn’s Superman never saves Lois directly. Not once.  Compare this to Donner’s movies, which feature Lois held at gunpoint, crushed by an earthquake, chasing a bomb, plummeting from the Eiffel tower, drowning in the Niagara Falls, captured by Kryptonians, etc. And each time she is saved by Superman.  Early in Superman: The Movie, a screaming Lois dangles from a helicopter crash off the side of The Daily Planet, a moment which compels Clark Kent to make his debut as Superman and save the day. Lois in peril marks the beginning of Superman’s heroic antics: Classic, bold, and fun. But let’s be real, there is nothing like a Snyder rescue.  In both Donner’s and Snyder’s iterations, Superman’s humanity is posed as a major weakness, often leveraging a captive Lois to add an emotional component to his human frailty. Towards the climax of Man of Steel, in a scene that parallels the climax of Superman II, Zod imprisons Superman aboard a ship with a Kryptonian atmosphere, rendering him as weak as a human. To make matters worse, Lois is also held hostage aboard the ship. What follows is one of my favorite Lois Lane rescues on screen. Lois plummets to earth in a burning escape pod. Superman grabs the pod, they make eye contact through the glass, and Lois calms at the mere sight of him. He punches the pod door off—pow!—and he draws her from the wreckage moments before it crashes to Earth and bursts into flames. Midair, he rolls her on top of himself, so that his body protects her from the explosion and we get a brief shot of her face tucking into his chest. Then, gently, he floats into the middle of a corn field. It makes my heart pound every time. Snyder crushes the Lois save in every single movie. They are the best, softest moments we get with this Man of Steel. The contrast between Henry Cavill’s otherwise stoic performance, and the care with which he saves Lois in this scene is exhilarating. But there’s something unsettling about this Superman. A disconnect with humanity that resounds through every movie. Batman v Superman has one of the most exciting and gritty Lois saves. Terrorists hold Lois captive, the US tries to bomb them, and Superman flies straight into the missile to stop it. Boom! He swoops into where a terrorist holds a gun to Lois’ head. At the sight of him, Lois slowly releases her grip on the terrorist’s arm. She and Superman smile knowingly at each other. Then, Superman blasts the terrorist straight through three walls. Hooray. This rescue shows that Lois knows she can put herself in peril and Superman will save her. It shows that she knows how he will save her. And it shows that he is indifferent to all other consequences—the life of the terrorist, the geopolitical implications, etc.—if it means saving Lois.  Donner’s Superman makes a similar decision in Superman: The Movie. Spoilers, but Lois dies in this movie; she’s crushed by an earthquake. Grief-stricken, Superman defies nature to save her. He ignores Jor-El’s warning that it is forbidden and flies so fast around the world that it reverses time. In this way, Lois in peril pushes Superman to new heights. But it also proves that he can be selfish; he cares more about her than anything else. This intense love for Lois makes the stakes feel more real. Indeed, how do you add tension to an action sequence about an impenetrable god? Make that god love something vulnerable. But we’re missing a big piece of the puzzle. Let’s get into the deep stuff: How Superman and Lois meet in Man of Steel. It starts with Lois exploring a mysterious space ship that landed in the arctic where she is attacked by a Kryptonian robot. What follows next is a strange sequence: While she lies injured, sprawled on the ground, Superman subdues the tentacled robot. She is alarmed by him and tries to crawl away in fear. He pursues her, tackling her into place. Holding her wrists, he gives her a reassuring—maybe even patronizing—nod and says, “It’s alright,” which somehow calms her.  Close up of his hands unbuttoning her coat. He then uses his x-ray vision to see that she’s internally bleeding. (Side note: I don’t know why he needed to open her coat for this.) He cauterizes the wound with his laser eyes and the camera cuts to a wide shot of Superman crouched over her prone body, while she arches and screams in pain.  In some ways, it mirrors the interview scene in Superman: The Movie. They are alone shortly after Superman has rescued Lois. There is a sexual undercurrent. He uses his x-ray vision to see a concealed part of her (though in Donner’s version, he sees her underwear). But this scene has violence in the foreground. It’s not news that Snyder has an overall darker approach to Superman, but when that darkness is applied to Lois—one of the few people he shows softness towards—the effect is skincrawling. In all adaptations, we know that Superman is more powerful than Lois: We just don’t often see it demonstrated like this. Interestingly enough, this scene has a foil in Gunn’s Superman. Early in the movie, we see Lois return to her apartment alone. She hears someone inside and dramatic music underscores the possibility of an intruder. Lois takes up a bat, but she drops it instantly when she sees that it’s Clark. What follows is a famously steamy kiss, the first of the movie. It seems to be in direct conversation with Snyder’s Man of Steel, offering an antidote to the possibility of Superman’s threat towards Lois: He loves her, pure and simple. Broadly speaking when it comes to violence, both Snyder’s and Donner’s versions pose a stark contrast to Gunn’s Superman, which very rarely indulges in Lois’ peril. Even in her more endangered moments, Gunn doesn’t linger on her. No close ups of her screaming face or last-minute catches before a building collapses on her. What gives? What is Gunn up to here? Well, that leads me to my last point… Do Lois’ Actions Matter? Screenshot: Warner Bros. No, not really.  Okay, okay, I’m mostly joking. If we’re talking Donner and Snyder, her actions could have an impact on the narrative. But it depends on how you look at it. In Donner’s movies, the romance is a major plot point. Many scenes are strictly dedicated to the will-they-won’t-they (think: the honeymoon suite in Superman II).  From a character arc perspective, whenever ​​Lois is in peril she challenges Superman to reach newer, more daring heights—but he struggles to balance his love for Lois with his responsibilities to humanity. In Superman II, Superman is given the choice to get rid of his powers and become ordinary in order to have a relationship with Lois Lane. His Kryptonian mother offers him an ultimatum: “If you intend to live your life with a mortal, you must live as a mortal. You must become one of them.” But if you view narrative in a comic book movie as action, then Lois takes more of a backseat. The closest Lois gets to influencing the action in Donner’s adaptations is through her journalism. In Superman: The Movie, her article on Superman leads Lex to discover that he’s vulnerable to Kryptonite and cannot see through lead. In terms of sheer action, Superman II’s Lois gets in a few punches. But she doesn’t end fights, which is a pretty good encapsulation of her overall effect on the narrative. Snyder goes a similar route in Man of Steel. Just like Superman: The Movie, Lois’ knowledge of Superman’s weakness contributes to the rising action. Zod and other Kryptonians kidnap her and read her mind. “I didn’t want to tell them anything about you,” Lois insists. “But they did something to me, they looked inside my mind.” But like her punches, even this doesn’t really matter. Smiling, Superman reassures her they did the same thing to him—so the plot could have continued without her. One could argue that she helps free Superman from the Kryptonians in Man of Steel. While being held captive on Zod’s ship, Lois inadvertently summons Jor-El. For this, Jor-El credits her: “Thanks to you,” he says, “I’m uploaded into the ship’s mainframe.”  He then guides Lois through every step of the rescue. Closing doors at key moments, instructing her to pick up guns, where to shoot those guns, etc. As in Superman II, this Lois gets some good hits in. She punches the female Kryptonian in this one, too. But anyone could have put the command key in and summoned Jor-El—it’s Jor-El who controls the ship to free Superman. I say “anyone” could have done what Lois did because, well, that’s exactly what happens. It’s telling that during the film’s climax, Lois needs to insert that same command key, but for some reason, it won’t go all the way in. Dr. Emil Hamilton pushes it in instead. (Remember Dr. Hamilton? No, of course you don’t. There’s no reason this minor character should get such an important moment over Lois.) So why is Lois even there? It reveals Snyder’s construction of the man who wears the cape and the world he’s trying to save. Snyder’s is a dark, inhospitable world where regular humans are mostly helpless to defend themselves against more powerful entities. Human actions have no consequence, at least not compared to what Superman can do. Similarly, in Donner’s Superman II, civilians try to stand up against the Kryptonians, only to be literally whistled away.  To be fair, in most iterations, Lois’ influence on the narrative is more internal than external. Snyder does position Lois as valuable because of Superman’s love for her. A scene from Justice League comes to mind: Shortly after being resurrected, a confused Superman fights the entire Justice League, easily overpowering even Wonder Woman and The Flash. Moments before crushing Batman’s skull, Lois arrives. “Clark, please,” she says. He settles, and her embrace seems to remind him of who he is. In Superman II, Lois represents Clark’s struggle between his responsibilities and his humanity. After he loses his powers, he’s beat up in a diner, and Lois says, “I want the man I fell in love with.” He responds, “I know that, Lois. I wish he were here.”  So, yes. Lois impacts the narrative arc. She forces Superman to reckon with his humanity and poses as an obstacle to his responsibility to protect humankind. It is narrative. It’s just internal and romantic narrative. But in Gunn’s Superman, the dichotomy between Clark and Superman is never posed. We never see her discover his secret identity, and this narrative choice makes the delineation less important. She teams up with superheroes and journalists alike to save him from the pocket universe and reveal Lex Luthor’s plot. Lois Lane then is an active participant in the lives of both Clark Kent and Superman. In fact, that’s the point: Clark Kent and his deeply human attributes are what make Superman, well, super. Don’t get me wrong, Gunn’s Lois is also absolutely pivotal to Superman’s internal struggle. She challenges him to be more open with both her and humanity. She challenges him to consider his morality. But that’s not all she does. Overall this Lois seems to have just, well, more to do. Not only does Clark speak with her at each major beat of the story, revealing his motivations, but she moves the plot forward in a tangible and human way. She has the observational skills necessary to spot evidence in the background of the “sexy selfies” sent by Luthor’s girlfriend, Eve Teschmacher. And, in a more pivotal moment, she teams up with Mr. Terrific to rescue Superman when no one else will. When they finally escape the pocket universe, a weakened Superman looks up at her, stunned. “You came to get me,” he says. I love a Lois rescue, but a Superman rescue is refreshing. It allows him to be weak, to need rescue from a mortal human. And that opens up space in the narrative for failure, for human growth. So Who Wins the Lois Lane Test? Screenshot: Warner Bros. No one, really. Each Superman is different and has his own strengths. But through Lois we can draw major conclusions about how each adaptation conceptualizes power, partnership, and humanity.  The flirty, witty Lois of Donner’s movies reveals an overlooked Clark Kent whose love for Lois can bring him to new, sometimes risky heights. She uses her journalism to get to know a willing Superman, but it is unclear if she’ll accept mild-mannered Clark—underpinning the tension Clark feels between his human life and super responsibilities. Meanwhile the awestruck, soft-spoken Lois of Snyder’s movies reveals a true god. One who claims to prioritize hope and humanity—though sometimes his own darkness contradicts this stated mission.  And Gunn’s critical, gutsy Lois reveals a Superman deeply enmeshed with humanity. She exposes his weaknesses—both through her questions, and through saving him—and those weaknesses are a celebrated part of him.[end-mark] The post The Lois Lane Test appeared first on Reactor.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. X and its artificial intelligence affiliate, X AI, filed a federal lawsuit Monday accusing Apple and OpenAI of colluding to maintain monopolies in smartphones and generative AI chatbots. “This is a tale of two monopolists joining forces to ensure their continued dominance in a world rapidly driven by the most powerful technology humanity has ever created: artificial intelligence (‘AI’),” the complaint begins. “Working in tandem, Defendants Apple and OpenAI have locked up markets to maintain their monopolies and prevent innovators like X and xAI from competing. Plaintiffs bring this suit to stop Defendants from perpetrating their anticompetitive scheme and to recover billions in damages.” The 61-page complaint, filed in the Northern District of Texas, alleges that Apple “has a 65 percent share and has long enjoyed a monopoly” in the smartphone market and that OpenAI “controls at least 80 percent of the market” for generative AI chatbots. We obtained a copy of the lawsuit for you here. By exclusively integrating OpenAI’s ChatGPT into the iPhone operating system, the suit claims, “Apple and OpenAI’s exclusive arrangement has made ChatGPT the only generative AI chatbot integrated into the iPhone.” According to the filing, the partnership deprives competitors like X AI’s Grok of the user data and scale needed to compete. “As a result of Apple and OpenAI’s exclusive arrangement, ChatGPT is the only generative AI chatbot that benefits from billions of user prompts originating from hundreds of millions of iPhones,” the complaint states. The plaintiffs also accuse Apple of using its App Store to tilt the playing field. “Apple has taken further steps to protect its monopoly in smartphones and to preference OpenAI by deprioritizing the apps of competing generative AI chatbots and super apps in its App Store rankings, and it has dragged out its App Store app review processes for those competitors,” the lawsuit claims. Unless the court intervenes, X and X.AI warn, “Defendants will continue to thwart competition, and their competitors, like Plaintiffs, will continue to suffer the anticompetitive consequences.” The lawsuit demands a jury trial and seeks an injunction against Apple and OpenAI’s deal, along with damages “caused—and will be caused—by Apple and OpenAI’s misconduct.” Before launching his blockbuster lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI this week, Elon Musk had already publicly threatened legal action over the tech giant’s App Store practices. On his platform X, Musk accused Apple of sidelining both the X social media app and xAI’s Grok chatbot from its coveted “Must Have” section of the App Store. “Hey @Apple App Store, why do you refuse to put either X or Grok in your ‘Must Have’ section when X is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps? Are you playing politics? What gives? Inquiring minds want to know,” Musk posted. He quickly escalated his warning, charging Apple with anticompetitive conduct. “Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action.” Apple’s App Store is under mounting legal and regulatory fire on multiple fronts, with governments, developers, and rivals stepping up challenges to how the company runs its digital marketplace. In the United States, the Department of Justice and 16 states filed an antitrust lawsuit in March 2024, accusing Apple of monopolizing the smartphone market by “hampering competition” and tightly controlling app distribution and fees. Apple sought to have the case dismissed, but in June 2025, a federal judge allowed it to move forward, setting the stage for a possible trial in 2027. The company is also still locked in its years-long battle with Epic Games. Epic’s original 2020 lawsuit led to a court order requiring Apple to allow developers to include links to their own payment systems. But in April 2025, courts ruled Apple was in “willful” violation of that injunction, imposing stricter compliance measures and even referring the company for potential criminal contempt. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post X Sues Apple and OpenAI for Alleged Antitrust Collusion Over ChatGPT Integration and App Store Practices appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

An American in Dresden...Was Knifed in the Face by a Syrian

Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound are pretty much household names at this point.

Swamps typically bring to mind an array of mushy greens and murky browns, but in Virginia, they do things differently.

Maybe there is a way to work out what happened, even if our science breaks.

Life finds a way.

At this point in his second term, President Donald Trump has higher approval ratings than Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama in their second terms. According to the Real Clear Politics average of presidential approval polls, Trump, on Aug. 13, 2025, had a rating of 45.8%. G.W. Bush on Aug. 13, 2005, registered a 43.2% rating. Obama, on Aug. 13, 2013, stood at 43.8%. For Trump, this approval rating follows: two impeachments; a verdict of liable defamation; a criminal verdict of guilty by a Manhattan jury for a supposed violation of federal election law; a prosecution by the Fulton County district attorney for alleged presidential election interference; an investigation by a special counsel into Trump’s role in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol building riot; the special counsel investigation of Trump’s alleged violation of federal law over his possession and handling of government documents, including classified documents; a verdict of liability and a judgment, now approaching $500 million, for supposedly inflating the value of his properties to obtain bank loans; a two-and-a-half-year investigation by a special counsel into whether Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election and whether Trump committed obstruction of justice during the investigation; and two assassination attempts, one of which nearly killed him. Trump’s approval rating follows the signing of the controversial Big Beautiful Bill. Critics claim the bill “kicks off” deserving recipients of Medicaid while providing “tax cuts for the rich.” The approval rating follows fierce pushback from so-called sanctuary cities and states over Trump’s campaign promise of mass deportations. The approval rating follows Trump’s unrealized promise to end the Russia-Ukraine War “on Day 1,” as well as Hamas’ refusal to release an estimated 50 of the remaining hostages under a deal Trump thought he reached for their release. Trump’s approval rating follows bombshell accusations by the Trump Department of Justice that Obama and members of his administration in charge of intelligence knowingly falsely accused Russia of not just 2016 election interference but of committing this interference to aid Trump. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced convening a grand jury to investigate whether criminal charges should be brought against members of the Obama administration, possibly including Obama himself. Trump’s rating is all the more stunning given the nearly wall-to-wall bad coverage by much of the media. In April 2025, the Media Research Center wrote, “Media Research Center analysis of the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts shows the new Trump administration has faced a withering 92% negative coverage, even worse than the relentlessly hostile coverage Trump faced in early 2017 ... (these) news programs averaged more than 19.3 million viewers during the first quarter of 2025, making them the most widely-watched news programs in the country.” But wait, there’s more. Trump’s Aug. 13 rating took place before Trump’s White House meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and before Trump’s White House meeting with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. After Trump’s nearly three-hour meeting with Putin, Trump and the Russian leader jointly addressed the media. They took no questions, but Putin agreed with one of Trump’s frequent anti-President Joe Biden talking points. Putin said: “Today when President Trump says that if he was the president in 2022, there would be no war, and I’m quite sure it would indeed be so. I can confirm it. Overall, me and President Trump have built a very good and businesslike contact.” That’s an extraordinary statement about Trump and about his predecessor. And then there’s the praise of Trump by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and his acknowledgement that Trump was right to a) criticize the failure of many NATO countries to meet their financial obligations to the alliance and b) make NATO pay America for its weapons and material assistance the U.S. is giving Ukraine. Based on recent events, Trump’s Aug. 13 rating has become ancient history. After his meeting with Putin, Trump’s Insider Advantage approval rating among voters now stands at 54%! Pollster Mike Towery said: “Only the nation’s oldest voters disapprove of his job performance, which is consistent with our prior surveys. Overall, his approval numbers are surging upwards post-summit.” I have long predicted Trump’s many successes would eventually propel him to a 60% approval rating. Should Trump’s meetings with Putin, Zelensky and European leaders lead to an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, a 60% rating is easily in sight. Larry Elder is a bestselling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an “Elderado,” visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on X @larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

On Monday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested media-celebrated illegal alien Kilmar Abrego Garcia – but, it won’t be able to deport him without getting past the “unhinged” activist judge who’s been defending him, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced Monday. “Today, ICE law enforcement arrested Kilmar Abrego Garcia and are processing him for deportation,” DHS Secretary Kristi Noem reported in a statement, stressing how Garcia’s removal is important to public safety: “President Trump is not going to allow this illegal alien, who is an MS-13 gang member, human trafficker, serial domestic abuser, and child predator, to terrorize American citizens any longer.” In her statement, Sec. Noem substantiates the charges against Garcia. ICE’s arrest comes three days after “An unhinged judge in Maryland ordered his release,” DHS reported Friday: “Today, U.S District Court Judge Paula Xinis—appointed by Obama—allowed Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a known MS-13 gang member, human trafficker, wife beater, and child predator to walk free on U.S. streets by not allowing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials to arrest and detain this public safety threat.” Judge Xinis is just one of the many rogue, activist judges who are putting their political agenda above their duty to follow the laws protecting American citizens, Sec. Noem noted: “Activist liberal judges have attempted to obstruct our law enforcement every step of the way in removing the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens from our country. Today, we reached a new low with this publicity hungry Maryland judge mandating this illegal alien who is a MS-13 gang member, human trafficker, serial domestic abuser, and child predator be allowed free.  “By ordering this monster loose on America’s streets, this judge has shown a complete disregard for the safety of the American people.” “We will not stop fighting till this Salvadoran man faces justice and is OUT of our country,” Noem vowed. Immediately after being taken into ICE custody on Monday, Garcia filed to prevent his deportation – and was awarded Xinis as his judge, Florida Voice News Assistant News Director Eric Daugherty reported, with mock surprise: “BREAKING: Kilmar Abrego Garcia has just filed to BLOCK his impending deportation to Uganda. “Guess who got assigned this case? “OBAMA Judge Paula Xinis.” ? BREAKING: Kilmar Abrego Garcia has just filed to BLOCK his impending deportation to Uganda. Guess who got assigned this case? OBAMA Judge Paula Xinis. ? pic.twitter.com/PqUUdBkIDx — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 25, 2025  

A court document obtained by Blaze News reveals that a final hearing date has been set, ordering the appearance of Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.) in a petition for injunction for protection against dating violence filed by the reigning Miss United States, Lindsey Langston. The hearing is set to begin at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, September 5, 2025, at the Columbia County Courthouse in Lake City, Florida.Blaze News reported on August 5, 2025, that Ms. Langston alleged that she was the victim of revenge-porn threats by Mills following the breakup of their three-year relationship in February of this year.'I can send him a few videos of you as well.'The original court hearing in this case was held via Zoom video conference on August 18, but was cut short at the request of Langston’s counsel, Bobi J. Frank, who explained to the court that they could not possibly present their case for a restraining order against Mills in the “17 minutes” of time allotted.In that initial hearing, Florida Circuit Judge Fred Koberlein Jr. responded by asking both Frank and Mills’ attorney how much time they each would need to present their arguments and witnesses. Both parties asked for 45 minutes each. The judge then instructed the parties to present to the court mutually agreed-upon dates — at the earliest possible time — for a final hearing.RELATED: Panicking? Cory Mills allegedly harasses Miss United States to try to kill bombshell story Tom Williamson/CQ-Roll Call Inc./Getty ImagesThe basis for Langston’s petition stems from a series of text messages she allegedly received from the congressman, in which he threatened to send photos and videos of the two having sex during their relationship to any current or future romantic partner Langston might have.In one such text message shared with Blaze News, Mills threatened Langston, “I can send him a few videos of you as well,” and said, “Oh, I still have them.”In other messages, Mills seemed to also threaten violence against any potential Langston suitors, saying, “[You] may want to tell every guy you date that if we run into each other at any point. Strap up cowboy.”Langston made an effort to fully understand the intentions conveyed by Mills’ texts, asking, “So I can be with you, be alone, or be scared that you’ll hurt whoever is in my life in the future?” Mills replied, “Take it how you want,” one screenshot revealed.Langston shared with Blaze News her concerns about these threatening text messages. “Am I gonna wake up one day to videos of us having sex on social media?” she wondered. “Because I know he has them, and he's put it in writing.”On July 14, Langston filed a report with the Columbia County Sheriff’s Office about Mills’ alleged threats of releasing revenge porn against her. She then spoke with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement a week later.Sexual extortion, under Florida statute, is a second-degree felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison, 15 years of probation, and a $10,000 fine.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!