'Voters want a proven America First champion like Kim'

The political stakes could not be clearer.

It was easy to wake up this morning feeling as if voters took an axe to decency and liberty on election night. New Yorkers handed Gotham to the Joker, the man with a smile painted on his face married to ideologies of destruction and chaos. New Jersey and Virginia gave governorships to, as The Daily Signal’s Tony Kinnett described, two “Karens”—two shrill liberals who dressed up as moderates eager to force-feed males into girls’ locker rooms and playing fields. And finally, Californians voted to strip Republican voters of nearly all congressional representation.And most sickening of all, Democrats demonstrated, with the election of the despicable Jay Jones in Virginia, their full embrace of political violence. The night’s biggest losers were those who held to the mistaken belief—even after watching all the left-wing celebration over the execution of Charlie Kirk—that a majority of Democrats don’t wish them harm. Tell me, how do you reach across the aisle with people who want to see you dead and your children dead in your spouse’s arms? How do you break bread with people who can know full well Jones’ deadly desires and go, “I’m fine with that, I’ll vote for him for attorney general”? That makes for a tough pill for us to digest. But all is not lost. Blue People in Blue States Are Going to Do Blue Things First, as bad as the night was for Republicans, the reality is that blue people in blue states simply did blue things. Sure, Virginians are tossing way the gains made under Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin like the Washington Commanders tossed away their football season. But thanks to the massive growth of Northern Virginia—a population grown fat on federal government spending—the Old Dominion is basically a blue enclave. As a Daily Signal colleague remarked, Virginia might as well recede itself back to Washington, D.C.Blue is going to do what it’s going to do and did so last night. That’s all. Red states and Republicans now understand, if they didn’t already, that they must put on their big boy pants and, to borrow a phrase, “Fight! Fight! Fight!” Democrats Are Setting Themselves Up for a Colossal 2028 Fail Who were the big winners last night? Well, Karl Marx and the “Globalize the Intifada” crowd, you might grumble. But in election terms, it was California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has seen her Democrat Socialists of America become the straw that stirs the Democratic Party’s drink. (That drink being Jim Jones’ Kool-Aid, as New Yorkers will soon find out.) There is no way Newsom, with his ego and coiffed hair, is not seeing yesterday’s victory of Proposition 50—the measure he pushed to redistrict the state to reduce California’s GOP representation in Congress by five seats—as a sign from God Himself he’s destined for the Oval Office.And there is no way AOC doesn’t see the vote in New York for Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani as a mandate from Marx himself that the time has come for an avowed socialist … in the form of a former bartender, perhaps … to head the ticket and damn the Democratic National Committee if it gets in the way again. Regardless of who crowds the Democrat field for president in 2028, it’s going to come down to Newsom and AOC or a similar AOC-backed Mamdani-type radical. But let’s stick with AOC for simplicity. Standing next to Newsom on a debate stage, she is going to look small—not just physically, but intellectually. He’s going to bake her like a California pizza.And after suffering the humiliations of Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris failing in their runs for the presidency, the misogynistic party that wants men in girls sports is going to side with the slick, rich, straight, white frat boy Newsom. While AOC will be carrying with her into the primary all the baggage of the disaster Mamdani will bring New York, and that will help the California governor, Newsom will be burdened with every ounce of the Mamdani disaster in the general election, along with his record of destruction of the once-Golden State. Most critically, the Democrat nominee for president in 2028 will carry the anti-American spirit of the Democratic Party and Democratic Socialists just as the entire country is chanting “USA! USA! USA!” thanks to its hosting of the Olympics. (That’s one reason Bill Clinton breezed to re-election in 1996.) The hubris of Tuesday night’s elections erases the lessons the Democrats should have learned from 2024 and guarantees a good election night in 2028. Call JD Vance “Mr. 48.” Politics Is Downstream From Culture … and the Culture Is Coming Clean Finally, take great heart in this fact: We are winning the culture war, and the politics will eventually reflect that as sure as Christmas follows Thanksgiving. Look at the countless high school and college students who are embracing the vision and passion of Charlie Kirk. Look at the religious revival among the young. Look at the collapse of the woke; of diversity, equity, and inclusion; of cancel culture; even of the transgenderism fad. Look at how the legacy news media, rigged social media platforms, and leftist entertainment are crumbling.Take the news from just the past couple days: TMZ reporting that new CBS News boss Bari Weiss is aiming to poach Fox News of some of its conservative talent.The box office failure of Trump-hater Bruce Springsteen’s movie “Deliver Me from Nowhere” and Hollywood as a whole having its worst October in 27 years. The birth of Elon Musk’s Grokipedia, a powerful new competitor to Wikipedia, but without the woke, left-wing bias. And the death of Teen Vogue. The teen magazine was at the cutting edge of indoctrinating the young and vulnerable into LGBTQ ideology and into the cult of abortion. Teen Vogue is no more. Traditional concepts of womanhood are rapidly becoming in vogue once again instead. A Bump Along the Highway So, while it’s tempting to play the blues after Tuesday, there is reason to be whistling a happy tune. There may have been pain on election night, but joy comes in the morning. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post 3 Reasons Not to Be Glum Over Tuesday’s Election Results appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Democrats on Tuesday night swept election races in New Jersey, New York City, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, leaving Republicans saying they weren’t surprised and Democrats gloating on Wednesday. In New Jersey, Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill, D-N.J., triumphed over former New Jersey General Assembly member Jack Ciattarelli, cementing four more years of Democrat control over the executive branch of the Garden State.  In Pennsylvania, all three Democrat justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court won additional terms in office with potential consequences about how late ballots and redistricting are decided in the future. Democrats wrestled back control of the Virginia governor’s mansion after four years of Republican rule. Virginia voters elected former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger to succeed GOP Gov. Glenn Youngkin, while Jay Jones defeated incumbent Republican Jason Miyares to become the next attorney general of Virginia. Jones was widely seen as the underdog after text messages from 2022 were leaked in which he fantasized about killing a Republican legislator and his children, but he still won. And in New York City, Zohran Mamdani bested former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa in a three-way race for mayor. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, D-Wyo., told The Daily Signal that she was not shocked by the outcomes of the elections. “Well, these were solidly Democrat states and cities, where [then-Vice President] Kamala Harris secured strong victories in 2024, so frankly, last night’s results came as no surprise to me,” Lummis said, adding that she worried more about the effects of the federal government shutdown on the American people. “What concerns me now is whether my colleagues across the aisle will finally abandon the reckless strategy of holding our government hostage to energize their progressive base. [Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.] and congressional Democrats made a calculated decision that shutting down the federal government and inflicting real hardship on American families was an acceptable price to pay for political points,” the Wyoming lawmaker said. “The result is that Mamdani is now the leader of their party, and Democrats are going to have to live with that decision,” she concluded. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah., concurred with Lummis about the sorts of states Democrats won in last night. “Blue states went for blue candidates,” he told The Daily Signal before adding, “This includes radical socialist Zohran Mamdani, who is going to deeply damage New York City, and Jay Jones as Virginia’s attorney general, who fantasizes about the murder of Republicans and their children.”  “Democrats have picked their champions—and the rest of America is watching,” Lee said. Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., also emphasized the ideological component of the electoral results in a comment to The Daily Signal. “It shows the Democratic Party is only moving farther and farther to the left. Mamdani, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, is now the mayor of our largest city, and in Virginia, Jay Jones won his election to be attorney general despite his heinous comments fantasizing about the death of the former speaker of the Virginia state House [of Delegates] and his children,” Schmitt said. “The bottom line is—the Democrats have not hit rock bottom yet, but every day they barrel closer and closer,” he said. Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, deputy secretary of the Senate Democratic Caucus, attributed the Democrat wins to the affordability crisis. “I can save you a dozen hours of podcast listening: People are pissed about high prices and corruption,” Schatz posted on X. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., meanwhile, emphasized the populist component of the elections, writing on the social media platform X, “Populist Dems won. Moderate Dems won. We won in blue states. We won in purple states,” adding: “Maybe the take is that (a) people think [President Donald] Trump is out of control; and (b) people like Dems when we’re taking a stand and fighting for what we believe in—as we have been for the last month.” After last night, Donald Trump should learn that his petty vindictiveness does not work.He tried to axe federal funding for the Gateway Tunnel—and in the end, it backfired and became a big factor for voters making their decisions in New Jersey.— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) November 5, 2025 The post Election Results Leave GOP Glum, Democrats Giddy appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal Senior Contributor Victor Davis Hanson. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos. Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. There’s been a lot of recent controversy over the indictments of former national security adviser John Bolton, former FBI Director James Comey, and now New York Attorney General Letitia James. And people are arguing that President Donald Trump had promised not to have a so-called revenge tour and use the law, in a weaponized fashion, against his political enemies, given what they did to him. And now he’s doing it. I think it’s time to pause. First, there’s a question of magnitude. Donald Trump was indicted 91 times in four different jurisdictions, local, county, federal. Those were coordinated. Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis’ main prosecutor, Nathan Wade, met with the White House counsel just three days after Donald Trump announced his 2020, Nov. 15, reelection bid. That same day, Jack Smith was appointed by Merrick Garland, the Biden Justice Department attorney general, to be special counsel, to go after Donald Trump at the federal level. That same day, Matthew Colangelo, who had come from the Letitia James state prosecution of Donald Trump, resigned his blue-chip job—No. 3 in the DOJ—to go to work for whom? Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. And that was 91 indictments. So far, we’ve only seen three key people indicted. In addition to that, we’re not even talking about the SWAT raid on Donald Trump’s home or the effort to get 25 states to de-ballot him. I haven’t seen Donald Trump saying to red state governors, “We’ve gotta get California Gov. Gavin Newsom off the ballot. He’s dangerous.” Or, “We’ve gotta make sure former Vice President Kamala Harris is not on that ballot.” Or, “You know, we found some evidence about former President Joe Biden. Let’s raid his home.” That hasn’t happened. So, we have to keep some fair sense of magnitude. Indicting three people doesn’t compare to what they did. Then there’s the question of high-profile people. Do prosecutors tend to select high-profile people more than the average Joe? I know that seems counterintuitive. We always think wealthy people have privilege. But sometimes, prosecutors think, “If I take this person down or I target them, then it will send a message to encourage the others.” Look at Patrick Fitzgerald. Why did he go after Scooter Libby? Remember that case? He said Scooter Libby had unlawfully disclosed the secret status of Valerie Plame, the CIA operative. But he knew at the time that Colin Powell, his own deputy—Colin Powell’s own deputy, Richard Armitage—had first done that. But he wanted to go after Scooter Libby to point out that I can take down anybody. Was it wrong? Yes. But that’s what prosecutors do. I’m not trying to excuse it. Why did James Comey—remember when he was in the DOJ? He went after Martha Stewart, put her in jail for insider stock trading. But it was kind of a minor—it was very minor compared to what the Pelosis have done. But he wanted to take down Martha Stewart. Donald Trump’s not doing that. But what they’re doing is they’re saying, if a national security adviser like John Bolton transmitted classified files and was exempt, then anybody can do it. If Letitia James is the attorney general of New York and she lies about her mortgage circumstances or her tax circumstances, or her primary residence, then anybody can do it. So, it’s logical, you go after people both wrongly and rightly. But more importantly, which is the real sin? Under the Biden administration, they knew that John Bolton had transmitted—they had information that a foreign intelligence source had interrupted or intercepted his own communication. And he was transmitting, allegedly, classified materials to his wife and daughter. They didn’t do anything. They didn’t do anything because he was useful. He was writing a biography that would embarrass Trump during the Biden/Trump election. Which is the greater sin? To let felonious behavior go unaudited, unaddressed, or to address it? Maybe you can say it’s selective, but a jury will find that out. At least you’re not giving exemptions and amnesty to people who have helped you. Why did they not prosecute former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and former National Intelligence Director James Clapper? They, all three, had one thing in common. They all lied, either to federal investigators or under oath to Congress. Why didn’t the Biden team go after them? Because they were all useful to them. Clapper and Brennan were on MSNBC and CNN, and night after night, attacking Trump. Andrew McCabe was on occasion. So, they felt, we’re going to excuse their sins, their illegalities—allegedly—because they’re useful. So, Trump comes in, and the DOJ under Attorney General Pam Bondi says they all have criminal exposure. And I’m going to enforce the law. You can call it selective, but I would rather see somebody enforce the law than give an exemption for political purposes. But we don’t talk about that. There is a lawfare. And the lawfare is not just prosecuting people in a political fashion, but more importantly, not prosecuting them, giving them exemptions. There’s another consideration. Whether we like it or not, almost all of these high-profile cases occur in the East Coast corridor, from the financial capital of New York to the nation’s political capital in Washington, D.C. As we saw with the E. Jean Carroll case and Judge Lewis Kaplan, as we saw with the Letitia James case and Judge Arthur Engoron, as we saw with the Alvin Bragg case and Judge Juan Merchan, and as we saw with the Fani Willis case and the Georgia judge—that was an exception—but the judiciary is more or less to the left, and especially juries and judges in Washington, D.C., and in New York. And the chances are that most of these cases, if they come to trial—and remember, these are not, the prosecution does not hinge on what Pam Bondi says. It’s what a grand jury of one’s peers decides. John Bolton, for example, was indicted by a grand jury. So was James Comey. And these are in blue jurisdictions. All down the East Coast, these jurisdictions. So, in conclusion, it’s going to be much more difficult for the Trump Department of Justice, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, to find a Clapper or a Brennan or a Bolton guilty in a blue jurisdiction, where you’re going to have juries that are, for the most part, decidedly anti-Trump. Much more difficult. So, they’re gonna have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a far greater degree than was true of Donald Trump. Donald Trump came in as a conservative, and in an era of rampant Trump hatred and Trump Derangement Syndrome, and he had to face predominantly left-wing grand juries, left-wing juries, and left-wing judges. So, if Donald Trump is accused of waging lawfare, there’s going to be a natural check on that. And that check is that he is going into hostile territory. He, I’m personifying it, but his attorney general will be going into areas that are not sympathetic to the prosecution but will be sympathetic to the opponents of Donald Trump. Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal Senior Contributor Victor Davis Hanson. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos. The post 91 ‘Coordinated’ Indictments to Trump’s 3. Which Is Worse? appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The following is a preview of Daily Signal Politics Editor Bradley Devlin’s interview with Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, on “The Signal Sitdown” to discuss California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s redistricting push. The full interview premieres on The Daily Signal’s YouTube page at 6:30 a.m. Eastern on Nov. 6. California voters greenlit Gov. Gavin Newsom’s war against President Donald Trump for control in the 2026 midterms.  Voters in California approved of Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allows Newsom and Democrats to take control of redistricting from the state’s independent commission, by an overwhelming margin—nearly 2 to 1. Democrat victory in the Proposition 50 fight, not to mention the other off year elections, is the Left’s strongest sally yet in what has become known as the redistricting wars. Hans von Spakovsky, a Senior Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, joins “The Signal Sitdown” to discuss. “What Prop 50 does is it temporarily takes away the power from the independent redistricting commission to draw up congressional districts so the Legislature can do it, and they’re going to use that power to redraw the congressional districts,” von Spakovsky told The Daily Signal. A 2008 referendum first established the independent redistricting commission California voters rejected Tuesday. “People ought to know that, back in 2008 actually, there was a huge referendum on the ballot to take away the power of redistricting from the state Legislature because they were constantly engaging in really partisan gerrymandering,” von Spakovsky said. “Voters overwhelmingly approved, setting up an independent redistricting commission.” The 2008 referendum applied to the state Legislature, but another referendum in 2010, which the voters also overwhelmingly approved, broadened the commission’s authority to California’s congressional districts. Now, Californians have turned their backs on the commission model, thanks to millions pouring in from across the country to prop up Prop 50. “It was like upwards of $80 million that [George] Soros-funded organizations and liberal donors just used to convince the voters to basically overturn what they had done before,” von Spakovsky explained. Make no mistake, the independent commission was no friend to conservatives. “Even with this independent commission, which was supposed to take politics out, the congressional districts were still gerrymandered,” von Spakovsky explained. “Republicans, I think in last year’s election, got like 38%—close to 40% of the vote went for Trump.” Yet, von Spakovsky pointed out that Republicans won less than 20% of the congressional seats up for grabs. “[Democrats] want to get rid of even those, so the Republicans don’t have a single congressional seat in the state,” von Spakovsky said of their motivations. “That’s what they’re gonna try to do.”Newsom’s play for control in the 2026 midterms, von Spakovsky said, “is the height of what you would consider to be anti-democratic action because they’re trying to deny representation to voters in California.” The post Newsom Goes to War With Trump Over 2026 Midterms appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Read the original post "Homemade French Fried Onions" on A Modern Homestead. Crispy, crunchy, and delicious to pop in your mouth, these homemade French fried onions may not make it to the green bean casserole! Fry them in your choice of oil, and coat them with your favorite flour. We use einkorn flour and coconut oil, but you can customize them to your needs. Make them in... Read More The post "Homemade French Fried Onions" appeared first on A Modern Homestead.

Dog walks should be enjoyable experiences, not anxiety-inducing moments where you worry about your pet’s safety. A reliable dog safety clip can transform your daily walks by providing the secure connection your dog needs. We at DogingtonPost understand that choosing and using the right safety equipment makes all the difference. This guide will show you exactly how to select and properly use these essential walking tools. What Makes Dog Safety Clips Different Dog safety clips function as backup security systems that connect your leash to both a training collar and a flat collar at the same time. Standard leash clips attach to a single point, but safety clips create dual attachment points that prevent your dog from breaking free if one connection fails. The American Kennel Club reports that safety clips reduce the risk of dogs slipping out and getting lost through this redundant security system. These clips typically feature stainless steel construction with quick-release mechanisms, which allows you to maintain control while offering emergency detachment options. The Real Safety Impact Studies from the Association of Professional Dog Trainers show that secure attachments can reduce leash pulling behavior, while the CDC reports that nearly 4.5 million dog bites occur annually in the United States. Safety clips address both issues through better control and prevention of escape situations that lead to accidents. The ASPCA specifically recommends safety clips with harnesses rather than collars alone, as this combination distributes pressure evenly and reduces neck strain. Professional recommendations emphasize using standard six-foot leashes rather than retractable options to help minimize injuries during walks. When Standard Equipment Falls Short Standard leashes fail most often with energetic dogs, anxious animals, or during high-distraction situations like encounters with other dogs or wildlife. Single-point failures become dangerous when your dog weighs over 50 pounds or has a history of pulling behavior. Safety clips become essential for dogs that have previously escaped from collars, breeds known for slipping out of equipment (like Greyhounds or Whippets), or any situation where loss of control could result in traffic exposure or aggressive encounters. Professional Training Applications Professional dog trainers consistently recommend safety clips for dogs undergoing behavioral training, as the secure connection allows for more effective correction and control during the learning process. The dual-point system provides trainers with confidence that their corrections will reach the dog effectively without risk of equipment failure. This reliability becomes particularly important when working with reactive dogs or those learning impulse control in challenging environments. Now that you understand how safety clips work and why they matter, let’s explore how to choose the right clip for your specific dog and situation. Which Safety Clip Fits Your Dog Best Your dog’s weight and size determine which safety clip will work effectively. Dogs under 25 pounds need clips rated for at least 50 pounds of force, while dogs between 25-75 pounds require clips tested to 150 pounds minimum. Large breeds over 75 pounds demand clips rated for 300+ pounds of force. The BlueLine 8-inch safety clip with adjustable coupling straps works well for medium to large dogs, while smaller clips with 4-inch coupling straps suit compact breeds. German Shepherds, Rottweilers, and similar powerful breeds need the heaviest-duty clips available because their pull force can exceed 200 pounds during sudden lunges. Material Selection Makes the Difference Stainless steel clips outperform all other materials in durability tests and resist corrosion from rain, snow, and saltwater exposure. Biothane safety clips offer superior flexibility while they maintain strength, which makes them ideal for active dogs that swim or hike regularly. Avoid plastic clips entirely for dogs over 30 pounds, as they fail under stress and create dangerous situations. Heavy-duty aluminum clips provide a lightweight alternative to steel but cost significantly more. The coupling straps should match the clip material quality, with Biothane and nylon webbing that offer the best combination of strength and weather resistance. Quality Standards That Actually Matter Look for clips tested to ANSI/ACCT standards, which require break strengths of at least three times the intended load capacity. The American Society for Testing and Materials sets specific durability requirements that quality manufacturers follow. Reflective safety clips that meet retroreflectivity standards improve visibility during low-light conditions and reduce accident risk according to National Safety Council data. Quick-release mechanisms should operate smoothly under load but never accidentally trigger during normal use. Professional-grade clips feature double-lock carabiners that prevent accidental opening, while budget options often lack this critical safety feature that prevents equipment failure during emergencies. Size Compatibility and Breed Considerations Different breeds present unique challenges that affect clip selection (particularly escape artists like Huskies and Beagles). Flat-faced breeds such as Bulldogs and Pugs require clips that work specifically with harnesses rather than neck collars to prevent breathing restrictions. Working breeds like Border Collies and Australian Shepherds need clips that can handle sudden directional changes and high-energy movements. Toy breeds under 10 pounds require micro-sized clips that won’t overwhelm their small frames while still providing adequate security. Remember the two-finger rule when fitting any safety equipment to ensure proper security without restricting movement. Now that you know which clip matches your dog’s specific needs, let’s walk through the exact steps to attach and test your safety clip properly. How Do You Attach Safety Clips Correctly Master the Primary Connection Point Attach your safety clip to the main D-ring on your dog’s collar, never to decorative rings or ID tag attachments that lack structural integrity. Position the clip so it pulls straight back from the D-ring to prevent uneven pressure distribution across your dog’s neck. For harnesses, connect to the designated chest attachment point rather than back clips, as front connections provide superior control over pulling behavior. Test the connection strength after attachment when you apply gentle backward pressure while you hold your dog’s collar or harness steady. Pre-Walk Safety Inspection Protocol Inspect both the safety clip and coupling strap for wear signs before each walk, as metal fatigue and fabric fraying develop gradually. Check that the clip’s locking mechanism engages completely with an audible click, then perform a firm tug test when you use 20-30 pounds of force to verify security. Examine the coupling strap for cuts, thin spots, or loose stitching that could fail under sudden stress. Equipment failures occur most frequently during the first five minutes of walks when dogs exhibit peak excitement levels. Adjust collar fit with the two-finger rule to prevent both choking and escape (as collars that move excessively during the inspection indicate improper sizing). Critical Mistakes That Compromise Safety Never attach safety clips to retractable leash mechanisms, as the spring-loaded components cannot handle the dual-point forces that safety clips generate. Avoid connections to worn collar hardware or frayed webbing, even if the damage appears minor, since stress concentrates at weak points and causes sudden failures. Rushed attachment procedures are a leading cause of improper connections that fail during emergencies. Skip safety clips with prong collars unless you have professional training experience (as incorrect attachment can cause injury or equipment damage). Replace any clip that shows metal discoloration, bent components, or sticky release mechanisms, as these indicate structural compromise that creates dangerous failure risks. Final Thoughts Dog safety clips transform ordinary walks into secure experiences that protect both you and your pet. The statistics speak clearly: proper safety equipment reduces escape incidents by 30% and helps prevent the 4.5 million annual dog bite incidents through better control. Quality clips rated for three times your dog’s weight provide the reliability you need when unexpected situations arise. Your investment in professional-grade safety equipment pays dividends through years of worry-free walks. Stainless steel construction and ANSI-tested clips cost more initially but eliminate the replacement cycles and safety risks that cheaper alternatives create. The peace of mind alone justifies the expense when you consider the potential costs of a lost or injured pet. Responsible dog owners must select proper equipment and maintain consistent daily practices. Regular pre-walk inspections, proper attachment techniques, and awareness of your dog’s specific needs create the foundation for safe outdoor adventures (especially with energetic breeds that pull frequently). We at DogingtonPost provide comprehensive resources on dog care and safety topics to support your journey as a responsible dog owner.

FBI Announces Arrest of Harvard Bombers

The Trump administration has been actively recruiting new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to assist in the effort to enforce United States law and remove illegal foreigners from America. However, some organizations have taken issue with the advertising efforts on Spotify to recruit people at this critical time.'This ad is part of a wider campaign from the US government running across multiple platforms, including television, streaming, and online channels.'MoveOn, a George Soros-affiliated organization, started a petition to specifically pressure Spotify to remove ICE recruitment ads from its platform.The petition calls the advertisements "offensive government propaganda" that uses "inflammatory and dehumanizing language.""And now Spotify and other streaming platforms are letting ICE use the platform that people pay for entertainment and connection as ICE's recruitment tactic. It's intrusive, offensive, and disturbing," the petition reads.RELATED: Deportations top 2 million under Trump — and most aren't by force Photo by Jamie Kelter Davis/Getty ImagesThe petition does not call out any other streaming platforms by name."This ad is part of a wider campaign from the U.S. government running across multiple platforms, including television, streaming, and online channels," a Spotify spokesperson told Blaze News"Users can also help manage their ad experience in-app by liking or disliking an ad or logging into their account via web browser and updating their ad preferences," the spokesperson added. The petition fails to mention that the only users affected by the ads are free subscribers. Paid subscribers do not receive advertising, leaving them virtually unaffected by the ads.On Blaze News' last count, the petition has 36,914 signatures. The goal is 40,000.MoveOn and the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!