As soon as Putin challenged — and Zelensky accepted — a face-to-face meeting in Turkey that would coincide with President Trump’s big Mideast trip, people started talking. Has President Trump been pushing for this meeting specifically because he would be in the neighborhood at the time? Would he shock the world with an unprecedented 3-way peace summit with the two warring leaders? The prospect of a monumental peace summit brokered personally by President Trump is not dead, as he indicated in front of reporters and cameras yesterday aboard Air Force One. He initially responded on Monday, before leaving for the Mideast, that his personal involvement in the high stakes meeting was being considered: At that point in the game, the two sides had agreed to meet. Putin proposed the meeting in Turkey after taking heat from President Trump for weeks. Shortly after, Zelensky agreed (though not without challenging and calling Putin out in the same breath) right after President Trump demanded he agree to the meeting with this Truth Social post: It was at that point that the President responded to a reporter’s question at the White House that he was indeed considering ‘flying over’, according to a same-day report in Newsweek: President Donald Trump, set to leave for the Middle East today, told reporters he may travel to Istanbul for peace talks between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday. “I was thinking about flying over. I’m not sure where I’ll be on Thursday,” he said. “I have so many meetings… But there’s a possibility, I suppose, if I think something productive could happen.” He added that the meeting between Putin and Zelensky holds promise. “There’s the potential for a good meeting,” Trump said, emphasizing the importance of the event. President Trump, who is brokering the Russia-Ukraine peace process, has expressed both frustration and optimism in recent weeks, believing a deal to be near, but just out of reach because the two sides are holding things up. (Emphasis Added.) One X account I watch closely had already foreseen the possibility that the President would take a Thursday detour to Turkey for just such a meeting. @WarClandestine posted this intriguing thought last Sunday afternoon: I’m just spitballing, but hear me out. Trump is scheduled to be in the Middle East from Tuesday the 13th to Friday the 16th, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates. What are the chances he makes a quick flight to Turkey while Putin and Zelensky are there? It’s… pic.twitter.com/sOaGxOJ72J — Clandestine (@WarClandestine) May 11, 2025 Today, the details of the big meetup in Turkey are starting to crystalize in to something less than hopeful. At least, that’s one take on the situation — but not the only take. Though Zelensky essentially guaranteed his presence at the meeting, openly daring Putin to show up in his fiery acceptance post, there are whispers that he may back out of joining the Ukrainian delegation. And the list of negotiators from the Russian side doesn’t include Putin, according to a French media outlet. An unnamed U.S. Official reportedly also said President Trump would not be joining the talks, according to a report today from France 24: Russian President Vladimir Putin was not on a list of negotiators the Kremlin published for talks with Ukraine in Istanbul on Thursday, despite Kyiv insisting he attend and some allies calling on him to attend. The Kremlin late Wednesday named four negotiators – including a hawkish former culture minister – and four experts for the talks, set to take place on Thursday in Istanbul. US President Donald Trump is also not going to participate in the talks in Turkey, according to a US official who spoke after Putin announced the Russian delegation for the talks. Trump had toyed with the idea of going to Turkey if Putin would be there. But hold the phone — just yesterday, President Trump was still considering joining the talks. The White House’s Rapid Response X account shared President’s comments yesterday. Though he indicating that his schedule today (Thursday) would be “all booked”, he repeatedly left the door open to rerouting his plans and showing up to the talks in Turkey, instead. Here’s the video shared by his team yesterday taken onboard Air Force One: .@POTUS on potential peace talks between Presidents Putin and Zelensky in Turkey tomorrow: “Tomorrow, we’re all booked … That doesn’t mean I wouldn’t do it to save a lot of lives and come back … I don’t know that [Putin] would be there if I’m not there.” pic.twitter.com/PmXeTgS5xM — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) May 14, 2025 It sounds like the media has decided to fix the President’s schedule in place, even while the President himself has consistently left the door open to attending the meeting if something important started to develop; which could be at any stage of the talks! He is actively pushing this meeting, and both leaders to show up, and in no uncertain terms saying he WOULD show up if it would make a difference. Here’s a longer clip of that conversation between the President and reporters to give a little more context published by the New York Post on YouTube: Meanwhile, in Russia… The Foreign Ministry basically called Zelensky an uneducated “tool” today: Russias foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova completely flames Zelensky for trying to undermine the Russian delegation in Turkiye. “A Clown, a Loser, a person of unknown education” pic.twitter.com/BPKOOE0Ps0 — Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) May 15, 2025 And as I write, word is coming in that a 5.8 earthquake just struck in Ankara, Turkey where the talks are currently ongoing. Apparently, Zelensky DID show up for the talks — and he endured the 5.8 earthquake alongside Turkish PM Erdogan. Check out this wild video, purportedly showing Zelensky leading the Ukrainian delegation to the peace talks hosted by Erdogan: First footage from Ankara, where a 5.8-magnitude earthquake struck minutes ago. Zelensky and Erdoğan were holding talks there. pic.twitter.com/xGxchYPa5D — Sprinter Observer (@SprinterObserve) May 15, 2025 It seems as though President Trump was right on the money in that earlier video I showed. He doubted that Putin would show up without assurances that would be there as well. I’m not surprised that Putin wouldn’t waste his time on Zelensky without President Trump there to push the Ukrainian in the right direction. But I am surprised that Zelensky showed up, true to his word — this time. The U.S. Dept. of State was seen disembarking the plane in Turkey earlier: BREAKING Secretary of State Marco Rubio just landed in Turkey for his HISTORIC face to face with Zelenskyy and possibly Vladimir Putin Trump’s Cabinet is working overtime PEACE through STRENGTH pic.twitter.com/wSMqKZme6X — MAGA Voice (@MAGAVoice) May 15, 2025 While Marco Rubio was seen leading the U.S. delegation as they arrived in Turkey, President Trump so far has not crashed the party. With Putin never committing to showing up in person, it may be that President Trump is simply applying pressure and waiting for the right components to align before playing his ‘Trump’ card — his own personal presence. It wouldn’t be surprising to see today’s talks turn in to a framework for another round of bigger talks with a more predetermined attendee list… that doesn’t just include both heads of the warring nations. When he finally does bring the two sides to agreement, I fully expect it to happen in grand Trump form — in person, with THREE sides signing on the dotted line. President Trump has a penchant for timing, and patience. But he also has a penchant for BIG BOLD MOVES. Given his comments yesterday, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn Air Force One is airborne with a northwesterly heading. All it would take is word from Rubio that a deal is close.  And I don’t think Rubio is in town because of the Turkish coffee. He’s there to do work, and get results.  And if he does, President Trump has made it clear that he would be instructing the pilots to file an altered flight path. I’m watching the wires close; you’ll know when I know.

Noah here….and I have good news for you! I think I finally have a great solution for everyone who is experiencing extreme Big Tech censorship trying to receive our daily email Newsletters. If you’re not having any problems, that’s amazing but so many people are. And it’s really gotten bad in the last 2 months, almost like Big Tech does NOT want you to see any good news about the Trump Administration, that’s how it feels to me! Don’t take my word for it, here are just a small handful of the HUNDREDS of emails I’ve received in just the past few weeks from people saying their emails from us either suddenly won’t work, won’t open, or don’t arrive at all (all private information redacted for privacy of course): Won’t open: Emails suddenly don’t show up: Content censored and sticking us in Spam and Promotions tabs: Complete block here: Newsletter won’t even load: But I finally have the solution! Think of this as the old “belt and suspenders” approach. If you’re subscribed to our email Newsletters, don’t change anything!  Stay subscribed over there.  Keep all that in place. We’ll eventually defeat the censorship over there too, but in the meantime as a backup (and as a backup for future censorship), I’m going to try and get all of you subscribed to us over at Substack. TAP HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON SUBSTACK (FREE) Why? Because they’re like the black sheep of Big Tech (or would that be White Sheep?)….. They don’t censor, and in fact they’ve built their entire brand on offering a safe place to publish your Newsletters. AND….although they’re not evil like the other Big Tech companies, they DO have a lot of the same tools, so they know how to get around the email censorship issues and make sure our Newsletter reports actually reach you, and open nicely when they do! How cool is that? So what I’m going to do is make sure our morning Daily Trump Report email Newsletter (sent each day at 8:30am central time) and our evening Daily Trump Report email Newsletter (sent each day at 6:00pm central time) are posted on Substack so you’ll get a notification and a link to see them.  Nice, right? I will also put my personal Noah’s Nightly Newsletter (TruthLion) over on Substack as well (posted each night usually round 9:00pm). You can subscribe to all of those posts, or just one or two, whatever you prefer.  It’s highly customizable. Nothing else is changing or going away — this is just one new option, but I think it’s a big one. So if everything is going fine for you that’s great. But for the tens of thousands of you experiencing email problems, make sure you follow me on Substack right now: TAP HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON SUBSTACK (FREE) Even if you’re not having problems now, it’s very possible you will in the future. Actually, as President Trump scores more and more wins in this second Administration, I expect the censorship will only continue to get worse. So even if we’re connected with you just fine right now, I would encourage EVERYONE to follow us on Substack to have that added backup option. It’s 100% free. I’m not looking to make a single dollar on this, it’s actually more work for me, but that’s ok.  I do it to further our mission. When you tap the link above, it will take you to a page that looks like this: If you see that, you know you’re in the right place. If you have more than one email address, I would encourage you to add all that you have. Oh, and one more cool thing…. It has a built in Chat Room and I’ll be stopping in there from time to time, so maybe I’ll see you in there? You can chat with me or 5+ million of your closest America-First patriot friends! Always fun to be with like-minded people, right? Oh, and I also hooked it up that you’ll get a notification whenever I post a new interview to my show over on The Daily Truth Report! So the next time we have Bo Polny, or Jovan Pulitzer, or Dean Cain, or Chad Stewart, or Loy Brunson or anyone else on the show, you won’t miss that either! You’ll get a notification a new show just went live! Ok, I think you’re going to love this and I think it’s going to really help us make sure we can defeat the Big Tech censorship. Don’t let them win. TAP HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON SUBSTACK (FREE)

Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealed that the Biden administration’s State Department maintained secret files labeling U.S. citizens, including a Trump-era official, as “vectors of disinformation,” raising concerns about government overreach and censorship. Originally created under Obama to combat foreign disinformation, the Global Engagement Center (GEC) expanded to target domestic critics, funding groups like the Global Disinformation Index to blacklist conservative outlets (e.g., Newsmax, NY Post) as “high risk.” Elon Musk, now a government advisor, condemned the GEC as a top offender in U.S. censorship, citing its role in branding dissent as “Russian disinformation” and its “disinfo cloud” project—a State Department initiative to equip Big Tech with censorship tools before the 2020 election. After Congress defunded the GEC in 2025, the Biden team rebranded it as the “Counter Foreign Information Manipulation Hub” (CFIMI), which Rubio swiftly shut down, calling it a threat to civil liberties. The scandal fuels GOP efforts to curb federal censorship, with Trump issuing an executive order banning unconstitutional speech restrictions. Critics warn that labeling dissent as “disinformation” risks state surveillance and chilling free expression, setting up a Supreme Court battle over First Amendment rights. Article by Willow Tohi, republished with permission from Naturalnews.com In a stunning revelation with implications for free speech and government overreach, Secretary of State Marco Rubio disclosed on April 30, 2025, that the Biden administration’s State Department maintained secret dossiers labeling American citizens as “vectors of disinformation.” Among the targets was an unnamed Trump-era cabinet official, underscoring an alleged campaign to stifle dissent through systemic censorship. The project, tied to the disbanded Global Engagement Center (GEC), has ignited fierce debate over executive branch authority, constitutional rights and the role of government in policing online speech. Rubio’s bombshell came during a high-profile Cabinet meeting with President Donald Trump, where he revealed the existence of taxpayer-funded GEC files that monitored social media posts to marginalized individuals and outlets critical of the Biden White House. Vice President J.D. Vance wryly joked, “Was it me or Elon [Musk]?”, before quipping that the matter would be addressed post-meeting—drawing laughter but underscoring the surreal nature of the disclosure. The State Department’s actions, once justified as a tool to counter foreign propaganda, have transmuted into a partisan battleground over civil liberties. The global engagement center: From counter-terror tool to domestic censorship fixture Established by President Barack Obama in 2016 through Executive Order 13727, the GEC initially aimed to counter terrorism-related disinformation abroad. By 2020, however, its mandate expanded to include domestic censorship, particularly during the pandemic. The center funded entities like the Global Disinformation Index, which labeled outlets such as Newsmax and the New York Post as “high risk,” a move criticized as politically motivated suppression of conservative voices. Elon Musk, now in a government advisory role, slammed the GEC in 2023 as “the worst offender in U.S. government censorship,” citing its efforts to frame dissent as “Russian disinformation.” The center’s controversial pivot became starkly evident in the “disinfo cloud” project, a State Department initiative to develop censorship tools disseminated to Big Tech firms ahead of the 2020 election—a program unmasked by journalist Matt Taibbi’s reporting on leaked Twitter files. By 2024, GEC’s budget—$50 million annually—still lacked transparency, prompting its elimination in the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. Yet Biden’s team rebranded it as the Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Hub (CFIMI) days before Trump’s 2025 inauguration. Rubio shut CFIMI in April, calling it an offense to civil liberties. “The department actively silenced Americans it was meant to serve,” he said, emphasizing its antithesis to democratic principles. The dossier on a Trump official Rubio declined to name the Trump-era official surveilled by the GEC, instead vowing to release the dossier directly to them. “There’s at least one person at this table today who had a dossier of their social media posts identifying them as a purveyor of disinformation,” Rubio stated, leaving the individual to decide publicizing the findings. Multiple Trump allies, including Musk, have long been targets of GEC scrutiny. Conservative critics view the dossier program as unconstitutional overreach. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) denounced the GEC at a recent hearing for “suppressing free speech using taxpayer dollars,” accusing it of serving as a watchdog for ideological enemies. Conversely, GEC defenders argue it combated foreign threats, citing reports on Russian misinformation in Africa and China’s $1 trillion media buildup. Former GEC director/statistician John Smith (a pseudonym used in previous reports) claims national security required “aggressive action” against pro-China narratives, a stance critics dismiss as broad overreach. The controversy aligns with broader GOP campaigns to curb federal censorship. President Trump’s April 30 executive order banned unconstitutional free-speech restrictions, directing the Justice Department to investigate Biden-era censorship. The State Department’s role in colluding with Big Tech—such as providing lists of “disinformation vectors” to content moderators—has further deepened distrust in institutional governance. Broader implications: Congressional battles and the 2024 election aftermath The GEC’s dismantling reflects shifting congressional power dynamics. The 2024 election’s GOP victories empowered lawmakers to defund initiatives like CFIMI and probe executive misconduct. Rubio’s reforms also signal a generational shift in how governments balance disinformation threats with free expression, particularly amid rising AI-enabled state propaganda. Musk’s advocacy against the GEC and his current role as a Department of Government Efficiency leader highlight Silicon Valley’s entanglement in governance debates. His claim that the GEC “threatened democracy” echoes bipartisan concerns over deepfake technology and foreign influence—but also fuels accusations of partisan bias. For Americans, the dossier revelations reignite fears of state surveillance. “If the government can weaponize ‘disinformation’ labels to target politicians,” observes civil liberties attorney Jane Doe, “it could silence anyone criticizing inept policies like borders. The next Supreme Court case might decide if ‘disinformation’ arrests are constitutional.” A crossroads for free speech and government power Rubio’s exposé underlines a pivotal clash between national security imperatives and civil liberties. While Democrats argue that foreign adversaries exploit disinformation to destabilize democracy, conservatives warn of the GEC’s domestic chilling effect on speech. The dossiers, Taibbi’s findings and Musk’s testimony all suggest systemic misuse of power—a pattern Senate Judiciary Committee plans to investigate further. As the GEC closes, its legacy lingers. The December 23, 2024, expiration of its original mandate preceded Rubio’s April action, yet Biden’s circumvention underscores the urgency of election outcomes for policy direction. “This scandal isn’t just political drama,” argues free speech advocate Mark Brown. “It’s about whether Americans can criticize policies—including border chaos—without being labeled national security threats. The 2026 midterms will decide whether truth wins, or algorithms do.” For now, Rubio’s commitment to transparency—with dossiers sent to targets—and the 2025 White House’s pledges to restore free speech remain cornerstones in this fraught debate. Yet as long as state and corporate power intertwine in defining “truth,” the struggle between oversight and autonomy may define democracy itself. Sources for this article include: Revolver.news Yahoo.com Fox28Savannah.com

Bible-believing Christians and those who are concerned about the economic future of America have the consensus view that strange times are ahead. Even with fiscal spirits raised by the election of President Donald J. Trump, geopolitical turmoil continues to threaten the markets. Physical precious metals like gold and silver continue to draw Americans to them even as price records are being broken every week. Christian actor Neal McDonough said, “In a world full of uncertainties, Genesis Gold Group has been a beacon of light for me and my family. That is why they have my complete confidence and faith.” With recent movies that highlight the uncertainty of today’s world, including “Homestead” by Angel Studio that tells of the aftermath of a nuclear attack, McDonough has built a reputation of being acutely aware of end times scenarios. His work with Genesis was recently highlighted during an ad he cut with fellow Christian actor Dean Cain. Faith Before Finances “For the love of money is the root of all evil…” 1 Timothy 6:10 is often misquoted to say that money itself is the root of all evil. This isn’t true. We can take the necessary actions in our lives to secure our futures and support our families without falling into a life driven by the acquisition of material things. This is why Genesis Gold Group is very different from other precious metals companies. Their adherence to financial stewardship as it aligns with faithful stewardship can be understood with their free, world class Wealth Protection Guide. But not all of their clients are Bible-believing Christians. Some turn to Genesis because they have demonstrated an uncanny integrity that is rare in the cutthroat business of precious metals. Unlike other companies in the industry, Genesis Gold Group does not promise “bonus” or “free” silver to their clients. Such offers are disingenuous; these companies don’t have so much extra silver that they can send out thousands of dollars worth to people who pay their $199 service fee. The math doesn’t add up, which is why even non-believers appreciate the straight-forward and transparent process that Genesis Gold Group facilities for its clients. To learn why McDonough and so many others are turning to Genesis Gold Group for their precious metals needs, request their Wealth Protection Guide today. Now please enjoy this hilarious clip with Neal and Superman (Dean Cain) together: (Note: Thank you for supporting American businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and working with them through the links below which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to tell you about Genesis Gold!  The information provided by WLTReport or any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice.) 

Why does all the violent extreme always seem to come from the RINOs and the Far-Left loons? Here’s the latest example…. Remember James Comey? Sadly we all do. He ALLEGEDLY just called for President Trump’s assassination over on Instagram — nice to know death threats of a sitting President are totally cool with Mark Zuckerberg, but my 1.5 Million pro-Trump Facebook Page “We Love Trump” was banned for no reason. Anyway, I disgress. Here is Comey’s post from about 30 minutes ago, that I screenshotted and posted on X: BREAKING: James Comey calls for President Trump’s assassination on Instagram! pic.twitter.com/tIH89gfB7M — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 15, 2025 Full Instagram screenshot here: Oh how cute James! You just stumbled upon this “shell formation” on your beach walk, just totally randomly and organically huh? What a cute little story! Gee, I wonder what it could possibly mean? Of course we all know what it means. It’s a direct threat to President Trump. To “86” someone most frequently and obviously means to kill someone. And “47” of course refers to our 47th President. Even ChatGPT gets it: Yes — in certain contexts, “86” can indeed mean to kill someone, though it’s more often used to mean eliminate, get rid of, or cancel something or someone. Common Definitions of “86”: Context Meaning Example Restaurant slang Out of stock / remove from menu “We’re 86 on fries.” General slang Get rid of / eject / cancel “They 86’d the idea.” Underworld/criminal slang Kill or dispose of someone “He got 86’d after snitching.” Origin Theories: Prohibition-era bars used “86” to mean “cut someone off” or “throw them out.” Rhyming slang for “nix” (cancel). Some claim it originated from Old Hollywood or military codes. In Violent or Darker Contexts: In mobster or gangland slang, “86” can explicitly mean to kill someone, especially when used by enforcers or hitmen. Example: “If he talks, we’ll have to 86 him.” Summary Yes — “86” can mean “to kill someone” depending on the tone and context. If someone says “86 47” in reference to a public figure like a president, that’s a very serious and potentially threatening implication, especially if it’s not clearly metaphorical. Dictionary definitions confirm the meaning is to kill someone: This guy is sick for posting that! Hey Pam, Hey Kash….if y’all are not too busy working on those Epstein Files, maybe you could look into this please? This comes on the heels of a closely related story I brought you yesterday: SICK: Famous Monty Python Actor Wants To K*LL Stephen Miller “By The Neck” SICK: Famous Monty Python Actor Wants To K*LL Stephen Miller “By The Neck” Why does Woke have to ruin everything? Now I can't even enjoy Monty Python anymore. Because after John Cleese just said he wanted to kill Stephen Miller and then specified "by the neck" I just don't see myself laughing at a Monty Python movie ever again. But that's just me. Allow me to explain what happened... John Cleese posted the following message to Twitter/X: I see Stephen Miller says he is actively thinking about suspending 'habeas corpus' As this has been the keystone of the Rule of Law for centuries, l'd like to suggest that we actively think about suspending Stephen Miller... Preferably by the neck Sick post. So I reposted it with this message to Elon Musk, Ed Martin, Stephen Miller, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and President Trump: Hey @elonmusk @EagleEdMartin reporting a death threat made against @StephenM Is this against TOS? Hey @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash is this against the law?@realDonaldTrump https://t.co/SIy3j3NSWZ — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 10, 2025 You can only see my post, not the original quoted post because Cleese deleted it. I had a feeling he might do that so I took a screenshot of it and posted it here: pic.twitter.com/Kj7mXzfxKh — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 10, 2025 Sorry John, the Internet is written in ink. You deleting that post makes no difference, we all saw you post a death threat. And we kept the receipts! Closer look here: So I'd like to suggest something.... I'd like to suggest we give you the "Due Process" you so dearly love (even though you're not even an American citizen) and put you on trial for making a violent death threat against Stephen Miller. Sound good? See, that's how we do it here in America.  Maybe the UK is different, but we don't call for someone to be eliminated "by the neck" here in America you sick piece of crap! Oh, and while we're at it, you're so worked up about Habeas Corpus? Get your facts straight before you call for someone to be executed. Here's the truth: SUSPENDING HABEAS CORPUS: You Do Know The Biden Regime Did It, Right? (MUST READ) SUSPENDING HABEAS CORPUS: You Do Know The Biden Regime Did It, Right? (MUST READ) There is so much talk and so much handwringing by the Far Left "MSM" about whether President Trump will suspend Habeas Corpus... Oh my! But, did you know the Biden Regime did it? For almost the full four years? It's true!  But first let me back up and explain what Habeas Corpus even means because I'm guessing some of you don't speak Latin? Habeas corpus is a legal right that protects people from being thrown in jail without a good reason. It literally means "produce the body". Which means in layman's terms the government must explain to a judge why they’re keeping someone locked up—and if they can’t prove it’s legal, that person must be let go. In simple terms:“You can’t just arrest someone and hold them forever. You have to show the court what law they broke and why they’re being held.” It’s one of the oldest and most important protections for individual freedom in any fair legal system. Ok, so that's what it means, and the MSM is freaking out that President Trump is going to suspend it in order to quickly deport all illegal aliens that have invaded our country. If he does, he would be in extremely good Presidential company: BREAKING: President Trump May SUSPEND Habeas Corpus To Deport All Illegals (Three Other Presidents Did It Too!) But more than that, I want to talk about how the Biden Regime already did it, from 2021-2025. As is usual with Democrats, they employ the "piss in your face and tell you it's raining" strategy, which I have to admit works really well for them. Here's how it works.... When someone like President Trump takes action, he does it out in the open, he calls it what it is, and he lets the chips fall where they may. What you see is what you get. But when the Democrats take action, they label it one thing (like, oh I don't know "protecting Democracy!" or "keeping you safe!") and in reality their actions prove they are doing the exact opposite. Take the J6 prisoners.... From 2021-2025, they were functionally denied every aspect of Habeas Corpus known to man, left to rot in disgusting solitary confinement cells with inadequate food, water or sanitization. Many died while being illegally held in prison with no civil rights. In every sense of the concept, the Biden Regime suspended Habeas Corpus for these J6 prisoners, but since the Biden Regime didn't expressly label it as "Suspending Habeas Corpus" the MSM is too dumb to connect the dots and do actual, real journalism. Good thing you have us! I always want to check my biases and make sure I'm not off base, so I asked the far-left leaning ChatGPT if my analysis on Biden's functional suspension of Habeas Corpus was accurate. This was my question: The answer is going to blow your mind. The far-left leaning ChatGPT confirms I'm 100% on the money: Analysis: Did the Biden Administration Effectively Suspend Habeas Corpus for January 6 Defendants? Overview: The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to habeas corpus—protection against unlawful detention—except in cases of rebellion or invasion when public safety may require it (Article I, Section 9). While the Biden administration did not officially suspend habeas corpus, the treatment of many January 6 defendants has raised serious concerns about whether, in practice, their constitutional rights were bypassed in a way that functionally mirrors suspension. Key Points Supporting the “Functional Suspension” Argument: Extended Pretrial Detention Without Bail: Numerous J6 defendants were held for months or even over a year without trial or conviction, often denied bail despite nonviolent charges. Judges and prosecutors cited "danger to the community" or "potential to incite violence" as reasons, despite precedent allowing bail for far more serious crimes. This mirrors historical suspensions of habeas corpus, where the accused were detained indefinitely without timely trial. Solitary Confinement and Harsh Conditions: Reports from defense attorneys, detainees, and members of Congress (e.g., Marjorie Taylor Greene, Louie Gohmert) allege that prisoners were kept in near-solitary confinement, denied medical treatment, and subjected to abusive conditions. These conditions—if deliberately used to coerce plea deals or punish political affiliation—undermine the right to due process. Selective and Politicized Prosecution: DOJ policies appear to have treated J6 defendants differently than rioters from other high-profile events (e.g., 2020 George Floyd protests). Many critics argue the legal system was used as a tool of political retribution, not blind justice—functionally prioritizing punishment over lawful due process. Delays and Denial of Timely Trials: Under the Speedy Trial Act, defendants should be brought to trial within 70 days. COVID-19-related backlogs and "complexity of the case" were cited, but critics say delays were excessive and strategic. Some detainees spent longer in jail awaiting trial than the maximum sentence they eventually received. Judicial Deference to Government Narrative: Many federal judges deferred heavily to the DOJ’s portrayal of the events as an “insurrection,” influencing bond rulings and plea agreements. This raises questions about impartiality and the independence of the judiciary—key safeguards of habeas corpus rights. Counterarguments: The Biden administration did not formally declare martial law, nor did Congress suspend habeas corpus as required by Article I. Defendants technically retained the ability to file habeas petitions, though these were largely denied by the courts. Pretrial detention is allowed under U.S. law under certain conditions, and some argue the threat of violence justified stricter measures. Historical Comparison: Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus during the Civil War with public declaration and Congressional support—open and explicit. In contrast, the Biden DOJ avoided official declarations but used prosecutorial discretion and judicial cooperation to achieve similar outcomes without political accountability. Conclusion: While the Biden administration never formally suspended habeas corpus, its treatment of many J6 defendants functionally mirrored such a suspension. Prolonged detention without trial, limited access to legal resources, harsh conditions, and politicized judicial rulings all suggest that the constitutional protections of these individuals were systematically eroded. This raises serious concerns not just about the J6 prosecutions, but about the precedent being set for how dissent can be criminalized under the guise of justice. **I do have one correction to make to ChatGPT.... It is NOT true that Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus with the approval of Congress. That is factually and historically incorrect. In boldness, Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus himself to act quickly and swiftly to save the Union.  Later, after he succeeded, he and his advisors worked closely with Congress to essentially "paper over" it after the fact. That is a massive distinction, and ChatGPT's comment on that point is vastly oversimplified to the point of being misleading. But all else was correct. Now back to the lawless regime of Joe Biden.... If Joe Biden can do that to AMERICAN CITIZENS who were peacefully at the People's House in D.C., then President Donald J. Trump can damn sure do it to illegal aliens who were illegally shipped in here by the planeload by Joe Biden. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Do what needs to be done, Mr. President. The American people have your back. History will remember you alongside Abraham Lincoln as Presidents who had the courage and boldness to save this Nation from the clutches of defeat. Thank you.

A woman from Georgia who had been missing for three weeks after hiking near California’s Sierra Nevada mountain range was miraculously found alive in a "snow-covered" cabin, Fresno County authorities announced.

The New York Times reports that President Trump requested DHS to ask for 20,000 National Guard troops to assist with President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration. As reported earlier, a massive crackdown on criminal illegal aliens is being planned. The request to the Defense Department came after President Trump asked the Department of Homeland Security […] The post DHS Asks Defense Department for 20,000 Troops to Assist ICE appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

President Donald Trump panned the notion of birthright citizenship on Thursday ahead of arguments on the subject at the Supreme Court, saying that it’s bad for the United States and good for illegal aliens who want to gain a foothold in the country. “The drug cartels love it!” he said. Trump laid out his complaint in a lengthy post to his Truth Social platform, arguing that the practice was outdated and that in the 21st century, there was no place for a policy that automatically conferred citizenship to every baby born on American soil. pic.twitter.com/97tfkVKsq2 — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) May 15, 2025 “Big case today in the United States Supreme Court,” Trump began. “Birthright Citizenship was not meant for people taking vacations to become permanent Citizens of the United States of America, and bringing their families with them, all the time laughing at the ‘SUCKERS’ that we are!” “The United States of America is the only Country in the World that does this, for what reason, nobody knows — But the drug cartels love it!” he continued. “We are, for the sake of being politically correct, a STUPID Country but, in actuality, this is the exact opposite of being politically correct, and it is yet another point that leads to the dysfunction of America.” Trump went on to explain the roots of birthright citizenship as a policy, noting that it dated back to the end of the Civil War. “Birthright Citizenship is about the babies of slaves,” Trump said. “As conclusive proof, the Civil War ended in 1865, the Bill went to Congress less than a year later, in 1866, and was passed shortly after that. It had nothing to do with Illegal Immigration for people wanting to SCAM our Country, from all parts of the World, which they have done for many years. It had to do with Civil War results, and the babies of slaves who our politicians felt, correctly, needed protection.” “Please explain this to the Supreme Court of the United States,” the president added. “Again, remember, the Civil War ended in 1865, and the Bill goes to Congress in 1866 — We didn’t have people pouring into our Country from all over South America, and the rest of the World. It wasn’t even a subject. What we had were the BABIES OF SLAVES. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Good luck with this very important case. GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.!” Trump followed that a short time later with a second post, once again referencing the policy’s origin just after the Civil War ended: “Remember, it all started right after the Civil War ended, it had nothing to do with current day Immigration Policy!” Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) echoed Trump’s thoughts in a post to X, saying, “Granting birthright citizenship to illegal aliens is unlawful and it has contributed to the highest levels of illegal immigration in history. President Trump is right to call to end this farce.” Granting birthright citizenship to illegal aliens is unlawful and it has contributed to the highest levels of illegal immigration in history. President Trump is right to call to end this farce. — Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) May 15, 2025