100percentfedup.com
Secret Service Pay Ed Krassenstein A Visit To His Home
Knock, Knock….
Who’s there?
SECRET SERVICE, OPEN UP!
That’s what just happened to Ed Krassenstein after posting this yesterday on Twitter/X:
8647: Another One Pops Up
It looks like the Secret Service weren't amused by the post and decided to visit Ed for a little chat.
Ed made the announcement himself here:
I literally just had the Secret Service at my house. More details in a minute.
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) May 16, 2025
This reply from AlphaFox absolutely had me cracking up!
How did they fit inside?! pic.twitter.com/ohffHmdgMz
— AlphaFo? (@Alphafox78) May 16, 2025
In case you don't know, the Krassensteins are, shall we say, very "slight":
RFK and the paid shills the Krassensteins brothers.. pic.twitter.com/NPVvmxYOgl
— AriesWarrior369 (@AWarrior369) June 3, 2024
Anyway, back on topic....
Ed gave more details about the visit which he is trying to shrug off as no big deal over on his Substack:
This afternoon the United States Secret Service showed up at my door at the request of the Trump administration. Why?
Because I tweeted the number 8647, a common protest slogan used by Democrats to call for the impeachment or legal removal of Donald Trump, the 47th president. No threats. No violent rhetoric. Just a number. In fact, in the tweet thread I blatantly stated that I never support violence in any way and want him removed from office legally.
The agents who showed up told me that they were “sent from Washington” and after explaining it all to them they appeared to understand that I wasn’t calling for anything close to the president’s assassination.
Apparently, that was enough for the Trump administration to summon federal agents to my home, claiming I had “threatened the president’s life.”
What’s really happening is Trump admin is changing the definition of a number in order to intimidate and squash the free speech of someone calling for his impeachment?
Let me be crystal clear:
“86” is well-known restaurant slang for removing something.
“47” refers to Trump as the 47th president.
Put together, it means: remove Trump from office—legally, peacefully, and through democratic means like impeachment or the 25th Amendment.
The number has been used at rallies. Protest signs. Even James Comey—the Republican-appointed former FBI Director—posted it yesterday on Instagram. That’s what triggered MAGA’s meltdown.
They know what it really means. But truth isn’t what they’re after—control through fear is.
Here was our original report from yesterday on this topic:
8647: Another One Pops Up
Earlier today, James Comey posted "8647" on Instagram, which many people immediately took to mean "86" (kill) "47" (President Trump).
Don Jr. called it flat out "calling for my dad to be murdered":
Just James Comey causally calling for my dad to be murdered.
This is who the Dem-Media worships. Demented!!!! pic.twitter.com/4LUK6crHAT
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) May 15, 2025
White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Cabinet Secretary Taylor Budowich called it "deeply concerning" and said it is "being taken seriously":
While President Trump is currently on an international trip to the Middle East, the former FBI Director puts out what can clearly be interpreted as “a hit” on the sitting President of the United States—a message etched in the sand.
This is deeply concerning to all of us and is… pic.twitter.com/RF0Dl3t1JF
— Taylor Budowich (@Taylor47) May 15, 2025
So you might think any reasonable person might want to steer far, far away from such a message, right?
Nope!
Not for the (definitely not ghey) Ed Krassenstein, who thought it was a great idea to double down on "86 47", take a look:
It’s time! pic.twitter.com/C8b54Tam74
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) May 15, 2025
Even added the caption: "It's time!"
Wow.
To be fair (as we always strive to do around here), while MANY are interpreting "86" to mean what I have always understood it to mean, Grok thinks it falls short of an actionable threat against a sitting President, although it sure seems like a line not smart to walk too close to:
Hey @TechSignalsonX, @EdKrassen, and @Bobby1419738 — let’s unpack this 8647 business about President Trump. The number’s been floating around as a form of silent protest, basically signaling that people want Trump out of the White House. From what’s out there, it’s more about…
— Grok (@grok) May 15, 2025
Krassenstein followed up the post with this explanation, trying to whitewash the prior post and claim it's totally non-violent):
James Comey is an American Hero.
8647 is the way to go!
It should become the new rallying call for Americans who are sick and tired of the US Constitution being torn up.
It should be a rallying call for Americans who are fed up with the current administration's corruption.… https://t.co/9a6BiczLYu
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) May 15, 2025
James Comey is an American Hero.
8647 is the way to go!
It should become the new rallying call for Americans who are sick and tired of the US Constitution being torn up.
It should be a rallying call for Americans who are fed up with the current administration's corruption.
The right wants it to be some nefarious symbol just they they wanted Abrego Garcia's tattoos to be. They want to demonize anyone who thinks Trump is toxic for this country.
8647 = Get Trump out of Office! It has nothing to do with violence.
COPE!
In a follow-up chat I had with Grok, it told me that using the term "86" in this context is arguably reckless and risks being misinterpreted as a call to harm, especially in the current political environment, and arguably just designed to create plausible deniability. Gee, you think? You mean the guy who's had two (that we know of) assassination attempts already, one that missed by mere centimeters?
Plausible Deniability and Reckless Language
Krassenstein’s claim that 8647 is nonviolent could be an example of plausible deniability—using a term that has a violent connotation ("86") while claiming it’s meant innocently. This is a common tactic in charged political discourse, where provocative language is used to rally supporters or provoke opponents while avoiding legal consequences. However:
The billiard balls image suggests the numbers were chosen for their visual representation, not necessarily to invoke "86" as slang for "kill."
Billiard balls are a playful, non-threatening medium, which supports the nonviolent interpretation.
Krassenstein’s immediate clarification ("It has nothing to do with violence") indicates an awareness of potential misinterpretation, which could undermine the argument that this was a deliberate coded threat.
That said, using a term like "86" in this context is arguably reckless. Given its slang meaning, it risks being misinterpreted as a call to harm, especially in a polarized political environment. Krassenstein’s attempt to frame it as a nonviolent rallying cry doesn’t fully erase the violent undertone that "86" can carry, and this contradiction is likely why some users reacted with alarm.
If you ask me, I think "plausible deniability" is what this is all about.
I think Comey's post was wildly reckless, and so now you're going to see a bunch of Democrat shills posting the same thing to Twitter/X to normalize it and run cover for Comey.
They'll say, "See? 50 people posted the same thing, and we all said it was non-violent so obviously it was."
Just watch, it's coming.
Here was our original post:
BREAKING: James Comey Calls for President Trump’s Assass*nation On Instagram!
BREAKING: James Comey Calls for President Trump's Assass*nation On Instagram!
Why does all the violent extreme always seem to come from the RINOs and the Far-Left loons?
Here's the latest example....
Remember James Comey?
Sadly we all do.
He ALLEGEDLY just called for President Trump's assassination over on Instagram -- nice to know death threats of a sitting President are totally cool with Mark Zuckerberg, but my 1.5 Million pro-Trump Facebook Page "We Love Trump" was banned for no reason.
Anyway, I disgress.
Here is Comey's post from about 30 minutes ago, that I screenshotted and posted on X:
BREAKING: James Comey calls for President Trump's assassination on Instagram! pic.twitter.com/tIH89gfB7M
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 15, 2025
Full Instagram screenshot here:
Oh how cute James!
You just stumbled upon this "shell formation" on your beach walk, just totally randomly and organically huh?
What a cute little story!
Gee, I wonder what it could possibly mean?
Of course we all know what it means.
It's a direct threat to President Trump.
To "86" someone most frequently and obviously means to kill someone.
And "47" of course refers to our 47th President.
Don Jr. gets it:
Just James Comey causally calling for my dad to be murdered.
This is who the Dem-Media worships. Demented!!!! pic.twitter.com/4LUK6crHAT
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) May 15, 2025
Even ChatGPT gets it:
Yes — in certain contexts, "86" can indeed mean to kill someone, though it's more often used to mean eliminate, get rid of, or cancel something or someone.
Common Definitions of “86”:
Context
Meaning
Example
Restaurant slang
Out of stock / remove from menu
“We’re 86 on fries.”
General slang
Get rid of / eject / cancel
“They 86’d the idea.”
Underworld/criminal slang
Kill or dispose of someone
“He got 86’d after snitching.”
Origin Theories:
Prohibition-era bars used "86" to mean "cut someone off" or "throw them out."
Rhyming slang for “nix” (cancel).
Some claim it originated from Old Hollywood or military codes.
In Violent or Darker Contexts:
In mobster or gangland slang, "86" can explicitly mean to kill someone, especially when used by enforcers or hitmen.
Example:
“If he talks, we’ll have to 86 him.”
Summary
Yes — “86” can mean “to kill someone” depending on the tone and context. If someone says “86 47” in reference to a public figure like a president, that’s a very serious and potentially threatening implication, especially if it's not clearly metaphorical.
Dictionary definitions confirm the meaning is to kill someone:
This guy is sick for posting that!
Hey Pam, Hey Kash....if y'all are not too busy working on those Epstein Files, maybe you could look into this please?
Meanwhile, White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Cabinet Secretary Taylor Budowich says the threat is deeply concerning and is being taken seriously:
While President Trump is currently on an international trip to the Middle East, the former FBI Director puts out what can clearly be interpreted as “a hit” on the sitting President of the United States—a message etched in the sand.
This is deeply concerning to all of us and is… pic.twitter.com/RF0Dl3t1JF
— Taylor Budowich (@Taylor47) May 15, 2025
Arrests and prosecutions soon?
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Honestly, I also have to say it's quite a lack of creativity James...
You do know Gretchen Whitmer already pulled this stunt, right?
Did Gov. Whitmer Just Threaten Our President? “8645”
This all comes on the heels of a closely related story I brought you yesterday:
SICK: Famous Monty Python Actor Wants To K*LL Stephen Miller “By The Neck”
SICK: Famous Monty Python Actor Wants To K*LL Stephen Miller “By The Neck”
Why does Woke have to ruin everything?
Now I can't even enjoy Monty Python anymore.
Because after John Cleese just said he wanted to kill Stephen Miller and then specified "by the neck" I just don't see myself laughing at a Monty Python movie ever again.
But that's just me.
Allow me to explain what happened...
John Cleese posted the following message to Twitter/X:
I see Stephen Miller says he is actively thinking about suspending 'habeas corpus'
As this has been the keystone of the Rule of Law for centuries, l'd like to suggest that we actively think about
suspending Stephen Miller...
Preferably by the neck
Sick post.
So I reposted it with this message to Elon Musk, Ed Martin, Stephen Miller, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and President Trump:
Hey @elonmusk @EagleEdMartin reporting a death threat made against @StephenM
Is this against TOS?
Hey @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash is this against the law?@realDonaldTrump https://t.co/SIy3j3NSWZ
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 10, 2025
You can only see my post, not the original quoted post because Cleese deleted it.
I had a feeling he might do that so I took a screenshot of it and posted it here:
pic.twitter.com/Kj7mXzfxKh
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 10, 2025
Sorry John, the Internet is written in ink.
You deleting that post makes no difference, we all saw you post a death threat.
And we kept the receipts!
Closer look here:
So I'd like to suggest something....
I'd like to suggest we give you the "Due Process" you so dearly love (even though you're not even an American citizen) and put you on trial for making a violent death threat against Stephen Miller.
Sound good?
See, that's how we do it here in America. Maybe the UK is different, but we don't call for someone to be eliminated "by the neck" here in America you sick piece of crap!
Oh, and while we're at it, you're so worked up about Habeas Corpus?
Get your facts straight before you call for someone to be executed.
Here's the truth:
SUSPENDING HABEAS CORPUS: You Do Know The Biden Regime Did It, Right? (MUST READ)
SUSPENDING HABEAS CORPUS: You Do Know The Biden Regime Did It, Right? (MUST READ)
There is so much talk and so much handwringing by the Far Left "MSM" about whether President Trump will suspend Habeas Corpus...
Oh my!
But, did you know the Biden Regime did it?
For almost the full four years?
It's true! But first let me back up and explain what Habeas Corpus even means because I'm guessing some of you don't speak Latin?
Habeas corpus is a legal right that protects people from being thrown in jail without a good reason.
It literally means "produce the body".
Which means in layman's terms the government must explain to a judge why they’re keeping someone locked up—and if they can’t prove it’s legal, that person must be let go.
In simple terms:“You can’t just arrest someone and hold them forever. You have to show the court what law they broke and why they’re being held.”
It’s one of the oldest and most important protections for individual freedom in any fair legal system.
Ok, so that's what it means, and the MSM is freaking out that President Trump is going to suspend it in order to quickly deport all illegal aliens that have invaded our country.
If he does, he would be in extremely good Presidential company:
BREAKING: President Trump May SUSPEND Habeas Corpus To Deport All Illegals (Three Other Presidents Did It Too!)
But more than that, I want to talk about how the Biden Regime already did it, from 2021-2025.
As is usual with Democrats, they employ the "piss in your face and tell you it's raining" strategy, which I have to admit works really well for them.
Here's how it works....
When someone like President Trump takes action, he does it out in the open, he calls it what it is, and he lets the chips fall where they may.
What you see is what you get.
But when the Democrats take action, they label it one thing (like, oh I don't know "protecting Democracy!" or "keeping you safe!") and in reality their actions prove they are doing the exact opposite.
Take the J6 prisoners....
From 2021-2025, they were functionally denied every aspect of Habeas Corpus known to man, left to rot in disgusting solitary confinement cells with inadequate food, water or sanitization.
Many died while being illegally held in prison with no civil rights.
In every sense of the concept, the Biden Regime suspended Habeas Corpus for these J6 prisoners, but since the Biden Regime didn't expressly label it as "Suspending Habeas Corpus" the MSM is too dumb to connect the dots and do actual, real journalism.
Good thing you have us!
I always want to check my biases and make sure I'm not off base, so I asked the far-left leaning ChatGPT if my analysis on Biden's functional suspension of Habeas Corpus was accurate.
This was my question:
The answer is going to blow your mind.
The far-left leaning ChatGPT confirms I'm 100% on the money:
Analysis: Did the Biden Administration Effectively Suspend Habeas Corpus for January 6 Defendants?
Overview:
The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to habeas corpus—protection against unlawful detention—except in cases of rebellion or invasion when public safety may require it (Article I, Section 9). While the Biden administration did not officially suspend habeas corpus, the treatment of many January 6 defendants has raised serious concerns about whether, in practice, their constitutional rights were bypassed in a way that functionally mirrors suspension.
Key Points Supporting the “Functional Suspension” Argument:
Extended Pretrial Detention Without Bail:
Numerous J6 defendants were held for months or even over a year without trial or conviction, often denied bail despite nonviolent charges.
Judges and prosecutors cited "danger to the community" or "potential to incite violence" as reasons, despite precedent allowing bail for far more serious crimes.
This mirrors historical suspensions of habeas corpus, where the accused were detained indefinitely without timely trial.
Solitary Confinement and Harsh Conditions:
Reports from defense attorneys, detainees, and members of Congress (e.g., Marjorie Taylor Greene, Louie Gohmert) allege that prisoners were kept in near-solitary confinement, denied medical treatment, and subjected to abusive conditions.
These conditions—if deliberately used to coerce plea deals or punish political affiliation—undermine the right to due process.
Selective and Politicized Prosecution:
DOJ policies appear to have treated J6 defendants differently than rioters from other high-profile events (e.g., 2020 George Floyd protests).
Many critics argue the legal system was used as a tool of political retribution, not blind justice—functionally prioritizing punishment over lawful due process.
Delays and Denial of Timely Trials:
Under the Speedy Trial Act, defendants should be brought to trial within 70 days. COVID-19-related backlogs and "complexity of the case" were cited, but critics say delays were excessive and strategic.
Some detainees spent longer in jail awaiting trial than the maximum sentence they eventually received.
Judicial Deference to Government Narrative:
Many federal judges deferred heavily to the DOJ’s portrayal of the events as an “insurrection,” influencing bond rulings and plea agreements.
This raises questions about impartiality and the independence of the judiciary—key safeguards of habeas corpus rights.
Counterarguments:
The Biden administration did not formally declare martial law, nor did Congress suspend habeas corpus as required by Article I.
Defendants technically retained the ability to file habeas petitions, though these were largely denied by the courts.
Pretrial detention is allowed under U.S. law under certain conditions, and some argue the threat of violence justified stricter measures.
Historical Comparison:
Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus during the Civil War with public declaration and Congressional support—open and explicit.
In contrast, the Biden DOJ avoided official declarations but used prosecutorial discretion and judicial cooperation to achieve similar outcomes without political accountability.
Conclusion:
While the Biden administration never formally suspended habeas corpus, its treatment of many J6 defendants functionally mirrored such a suspension. Prolonged detention without trial, limited access to legal resources, harsh conditions, and politicized judicial rulings all suggest that the constitutional protections of these individuals were systematically eroded. This raises serious concerns not just about the J6 prosecutions, but about the precedent being set for how dissent can be criminalized under the guise of justice.
**I do have one correction to make to ChatGPT....
It is NOT true that Abraham Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus with the approval of Congress.
That is factually and historically incorrect.
In boldness, Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus himself to act quickly and swiftly to save the Union. Later, after he succeeded, he and his advisors worked closely with Congress to essentially "paper over" it after the fact.
That is a massive distinction, and ChatGPT's comment on that point is vastly oversimplified to the point of being misleading.
But all else was correct.
Now back to the lawless regime of Joe Biden....
If Joe Biden can do that to AMERICAN CITIZENS who were peacefully at the People's House in D.C., then President Donald J. Trump can damn sure do it to illegal aliens who were illegally shipped in here by the planeload by Joe Biden.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Do what needs to be done, Mr. President.
The American people have your back.
History will remember you alongside Abraham Lincoln as Presidents who had the courage and boldness to save this Nation from the clutches of defeat.
Thank you.
News Feed (Home)
Popular Posts 
Events 
Blog 
Market 
Forum 
Headline News
VidWatch
Game Zone
Top PodCasts
