'President Trump's cardiovascular imaging was perfectly normal'

What do you think?

Their mother often boasted to her three sons that she had very valuable comic books upstairs, but they never sought to verify or explore her claim. Now, her Superman No.1 comic book has become the most valuable one ever auctioned, after hauling in $9.1 million on November 20th. Found where treasures often are—in the attic […] The post Superman No.1 Comic Book Found in Mom’s Attic Bags $9.1 Million in Most Valuable Comic Auction Ever appeared first on Good News Network.

News Stranger Things Stranger Things Season 5 Finale Tickets and Showtimes Quietly Go Live as Netflix Preps Theatrical Release Regal Cinemas seems to have published the tickets and showtimes for the Stranger Things finale a bit early. By Matthew Byrd | Published on December 1, 2025 Photo: Netflix Comment 0 Share New Share Photo: Netflix Netflix surprised many when it announced that the Stranger Things season 5 finale will receive a limited theatrical release. After all, the streaming service has a… notable history of refusing to give its major movies true theatrical releases, so it was hardly a guarantee that the Stranger Things finale would receive that treatment, despite the Duffer Brothers advocating for the film-length finale to receive special considerations. However, it was far less surprising to see Netflix announce that the Stranger Things season 5 finale will air in theaters without actually bothering to release any useful information about where and when to buy tickets to said event. In typical Netflix fashion, we finally know a little more about when and where you’ll be able to watch that episode, and it was announced in the least ceremonious fashion possible. The Regal Cinemas website has just been updated with theatrical showtimes for the Stranger Things series finale. As previously stated, the finale will run in theaters from December 31 (the day the episode premieres on Netflix) to January 1, 2026. There’s no word on how many screens the finale will play on, though Netflix has confirmed that the episode will only receive a theatrical release in the U.S. and Canada. If it feels like a mistake that Regal would just post showtimes with no formal announcement… well, it might be. The Stranger Things social media team recently noted that you’ll be able to reserve your tickets for the finale starting tomorrow (December 2), but it seems like Regal may have jumped the gun. As such, there’s still a very good chance that more theaters will publish their ticket pages and showtimes in the next 24 hours. Regardless, the Regal information makes it clear that this will be a very limited release. Some major cities are only getting a couple of showings, while others have seemingly been excluded entirely. It’s what we all should have expected from the studio that let the most recent (and excellent) Knives Out movie flop at the box office for no reason, though you really should be allowed to expect nice things this time of year. [end-mark] The post <i>Stranger Things</i> Season 5 Finale Tickets and Showtimes Quietly Go Live as Netflix Preps Theatrical Release appeared first on Reactor.

Picking Your Poison Poorly: Trump v the 'Cold' Cotswolds

Sometimes leftist media outlets try to out-dumb themselves like it’s some sort of prestigious competition for who can churn out the most ignoramus hot take of the year. The Washington Post is definitely in the running for first place with its latest stupidity about inflation. Post reporter Julie Zauzmer Weil published a piece of propaganda with a headline that defied any modicum of common sense: “Why you may not want lower prices as much as you think you do.” Her sub-headline was just as bad: “Though Americans might be clamoring for relief on groceries, housing and energy costs, economists say there’s a bigger downside to falling prices.” Imagine being a Post editor with at least a functioning brain agreeing that this insanity was actually going to go over well with the readership. This is just as kooky as when MSNBC tweeted out November 8, 2021, that the spiking inflation running amok under President Joe Biden was “a good thing.” But Weil couldn’t be stopped. She spent 1,456 words worth of column inches attempting to make this lunacy somehow make a lick of sense. Despite her own admission that prices across a litany of sectors soared a whopping 25 percent over the last five years, Weil then basically just told American consumers to deal with it: “The problem is, there’s generally no going back once prices rise. And for good reason.” She then distorted the dismal science of economics to cast falling prices as a de facto indicator of recession: “Ironically, falling prices can both signal a recession and trigger one.” Here’s the glaring problem with that logic. Deflation, as Investopedia explained, could actually be considered a “good thing” for “most of the time.” In fact, with prices as exorbitantly high as they are, a general decrease “gives consumers greater purchasing power.” Aside from price drops from food and energy volatility, which Weil conceded were welcome exceptions, Investopedia further contextualized that “a general, persistent fall in all prices not only allows people to consume more but can promote economic growth and stability by enhancing the function of money as a store of value and encouraging real saving.”  Even the National Bureau of Economic Research wrote in a paper published 2004 that there’s much more nuance to deflation than what Weil let on. “Good deflation, they maintain, occurs when aggregate supply of goods (say from technological advances, improved productivity, and the like) increases faster than aggregate demand, resulting in falling prices,” NBER noted. “Bad deflation in turn occurs when aggregate demand falls faster than any growth in aggregate supply.” NBER even concluded then that “These economists find that, contrary to conventional wisdom, deflation may well be more positive than negative.”  You wouldn’t know any of this nuance reading Weil’s nutty piece painting a broad, negative stroke across a decrease in prices writ large. Instead, she simply conjectured that “If wages stay high but the price of goods fall, companies won’t make enough profit to pay their employees.” She even cited Columbia Business School Professor Laura Veldkamp to take her fringe theory a step further by suggesting that “even the expectation of lower prices can trigger a recession.” How dare Americans not want to pay the price of a new car for a used one! Are we getting that right, Weil? Veldkamp reportedly told Weil that “‘“Price declines are typically associated with really severe negative outcomes,’” which in light of Investopedia’s context clearly shows this is not necessarily true. Mises Institute Associate Scholar Frank Shostak even wrote in January that “Contrary to such thinking, deflation, which is manifested by declining prices, is the mechanism that makes a great variety of goods produced more accessible to individuals.” So what exactly would work to compensate for this dilemma, eh Weil? Well, she gave one suggestion: government price controls. Yes, you read that right:  [Moody’s Analytics economist Matt] Colyar said he thinks government policy could reduce prices in two major areas: housing and health care. The government is heavily involved in health care and could pursue policies that reduce costs. So the solution is the government once again sticking its grubby hands to control the means of production. Now where have we heard that hammer and sickle idea before? Weil continued to go down that cesspool, and even puffed up communist New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s economy-wrecking government tax and spend policies: Some left-leaning activists who have been blaming Trump for high prices acknowledge he can’t return prices to pre-pandemic levels. Instead, while acknowledging the risks that government spending can itself juice inflation, some envision a government that covers more of the costs with which families are struggling. Zohran Mamdani won the New York mayoral race on a platform that calls for subsidizing child care, freezing rent and making public transit free. Holy smokes. It’s like watching a train wreck happen in real time.

“Heard heavy footsteps coming up the stairs,” Kevin Root recalled to KDVR-TV about a heart-stopping 3:30 a.m. encounter at his family's Denver home last month. “As a parent, you know your kids’ footsteps, and this was not any of our kids.”The unsettling noises woke up Kevin and his wife, Sarah, the station said — and Kevin got up to find out where the sounds were coming from.'It feels unsettling that something so invasive and violating is permitted to happen and the person is back on the street.'“We had our door slightly cracked, and I saw the shadow go by, and that just is a sinking feeling,” Sarah added to KDVR.Turns out an intruder had broken the lock on the Roots' front door — and now he was on the staircase, the station said.“As I heard him coming up, I said, ‘Who is this?’ I just yelled, thinking, ‘Let me just let him know, like, we know you’re here. We’re awake,'” Kevin recalled to KDVR.The Roots told the station the intruder kept silent and was heading to where their children were sleeping.“As a mom, it’s just your worst nightmare," Sarah shared with KDVR. "It’s terrifying."Neither parent had any idea if the intruder was armed, either, the station said — but Kevin knew there was only one thing to do."There comes a moment where you’re like, 'This is me. I’m a husband and a father; it’s on me to do something,'" he told KDVR.The station noted that while Sarah called 911 from their bedroom, Kevin got physical: "It was just one of those, like, ‘This is my moment.’ So I jumped out of the bedroom, and I pushed him down the stairs."More from KDVR:He says the man fell all the way to the bottom, knocking some pictures off the wall and leaving a dent in the molding. He took a video as police arrived minutes later while the man laid on the floor.The man eventually went peacefully into custody; all he took from the home was a fall decoration from the porch."We’re just thankful that everyone is OK,” Sarah added to the station.Charley Cooley, 36, faced a felony second-degree robbery charge, KDVR reported, adding that his record shows he already had been arrested in September for another felony robbery charge in connection with an incident earlier in 2025.RELATED: Army vet learns daughter got attacked, but she's at college 1,000 miles away. So he's on a plane that day and settles things. Fox News reported that after his September arrest, Cooley was released just days later."We found out later about his criminal background, and that stirred up a whole new layer of emotion," Sarah added to the cable network. "It feels unsettling that something so invasive and violating is permitted to happen and the person is back on the street."But it gets even worse.The Denver District Attorney’s Office told Fox News that a judge set Cooley's bond at $5,000 property/surety or $500 cash following the break-in at the Roots' home.Sure enough, Cooley posted $500 cash, the cable network said, citing KDVR."Multiple offenses, and he’s been released both times," Kevin shared with Fox News. "The reality is he’s back out and has a history of doing this."Sarah added to the cable network that "we hope there’s justice and that he’s placed somewhere that prevents him from hurting anyone else."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Last week, many of you likely sat around the Thanksgiving table with people who don’t share your worldview, but it didn’t stop you from breaking bread. In the end, family trumped ideological disputes.But not everyone was willing to set aside their differences in the name of community and celebration. Jimmy Kimmel and his wife, Molly McNearney, for example, have cut contact with their family members who voted for Donald Trump.On November 6 during an episode of the “We Can Do Hard Things” podcast, McNearney said, “It hurts me so much because of the personal relationship I now have where my husband is out there fighting this man, and to me, them voting for Trump is them not voting for my husband and me and our family, and I unfortunately have lost relationships with people in my family because of it.”“I feel like I’m kind of in constant conflict, and I’m angry all the time. ... I personalize everything now. When I see these terrible stories every day, I’m immediately mad at certain aunts, uncles, cousins who put him in power. ... I wish I could deprogram myself in some way, but I get really angry,” she added.“It’s weird how things have changed now,” Glenn Beck says in response. “But I've been thinking about it, and I think politics was not the sacred altar that it is now. Washington was not the center of our personal universe. Family was, community was, how we treated each other was. We had room to be wrong, room to disagree, room to be human.” Glenn’s question, not just for McNearney and other like-minded liberals but also people on the right who let politics destroy their relationships, is: “Why is it so important to us that everyone sees the world exactly the way we do?”“My relatives, I don’t hate them because they don’t agree with me. We hash it out, we roll our eyes, and then, ‘Pass the potatoes, will you?’” he says, noting that there are a lot of people in his family who vehemently oppose his views.In the interview, McNearney also stated, “To me, this isn’t politics. It’s truly values,” but Glenn calls out her hypocrisy.“Here’s one value that we all used to share: the value of accepting that other people, even family, even people you love, are allowed to be wrong. They’re allowed to fail. They’re allowed to see a world through a different prism,” he says.“This belief that everybody who doesn’t agree with you, they’re somehow or another misinformed, that they’re somehow lesser, that if they don’t vote the way you want, they’re not voting for your family — that’s not democracy; that’s the seed of authoritarian thinking.”Eventually, that little whispering voice that convinces you to be angry and reject people who don’t agree with you gets louder and louder.“Do you force them eventually to see it your way? Because if you’ve tried to convince them and they can’t be convinced, your choice really is love them or force them into silence,” Glenn says.Or, as Glenn suggests, “You shrug your shoulders and say, ‘Pass the potatoes.’”To hear more of Glenn’s commentary, watch the video above.Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Millions of Americans across the country were told during the pandemic to offer up their arms for the COVID-19 vaccines — the first-ever mRNA vaccines approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — if they wanted to keep their jobs, eat in public, stay in school, or visit their loved ones.Government officials, the establishment media, and pharmaceutical representatives claimed that the vaccines were "safe and effective." Those who dared to suggest otherwise about the experimental drugs that were making liability-shielded vaccine manufacturers record profits were often attacked and censored.Months after the Department of Health and Human Services concluded that "mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses," the Food and Drug Administration admitted in an internal letter that the COVID-19 vaccines killed numerous children.'Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced.'Dr. Vinay Prasad, chief medical officer at the FDA and director at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, noted in an email to staff on Friday that FDA Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance career staff "have found that at least 10 children have died after and because of receiving COVID-19 vaccination."In the email, which was reviewed by multiple publications and shared online by the Washington Post, Prasad indicated that the OBPV performed an analysis of 96 deaths between 2021 and 2024 and concluded "that no fewer than 10 are related. If anything, this represents conservative coding, where vaccines are exculpated rather than indicated in cases of ambiguity. The real number is higher.""These deaths are related to vaccination (likely/probable/possible attribution made by staff). That number is certainly an underestimate due to underreporting, and inherent bias in attribution," wrote Prasad. "This safety signal has far-reaching implications for Americans, the U.S. pandemic response, and the agency itself."RELATED: Pfizer COVID shot sales plummet after Trump administration ends universal recommendations Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty ImagesDespite the strong improbability of a healthy child getting seriously ill from COVID, former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky, and other health officials championed injecting kids with the novel vaccines.On Nov. 2, 2021, then-President Joe Biden's health officials gave final approval to Pfizer's COVID-19 shot for kids ages 5 to 11. Biden said at the time, "It is a major step forward for our nation in our fight to defeat the virus."COVID-19 vaccination for children younger than 5 began across the U.S. in June 2022."These vaccines are safe, highly effective, and will give parents the peace of mind of knowing their child is protected from the worst outcomes of COVID-19," said Biden.Prasad noted in his Friday letter that despite evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine put boys and young men at great risk of myocarditis, Biden health officials "did not quickly attempt mitigation strategies such as spacing doses apart, lowering doses, omitting doses among those with prior COVID-19."Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle that can manifest as various symptoms, including heart palpitations, chest pain, fainting, and weakness, and can also cause fatal cardiac arrest."Worse, the FDA delayed acknowledgement of the safety signal until after it could extend marketing authorization to younger boys 12-15," continued Prasad. "Had the acknowledgement come early, these younger boys, who likely did not require COVID-19 vaccination, may have chosen to avoid the products."The FDA's chief medical officer stressed that the OBPV's finding that the COVID vaccine contributed to the deaths of children amounted to "a profound revelation.""For the first time, the U.S. FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children," continued Prasad, whose agency revoked emergency-use authorization for COVID vaccines earlier this year. "Healthy young children who faced tremendously low risk of death were coerced, at the behest of the Biden administration, via school and work mandates, to receive a vaccine that could result in death. In many cases, such mandates were harmful."Peter Marks, Prasad's predecessor, complained to the New York Times about the "political tone" of Prasad's letter and noted, "I would not be surprised if the attributions turn out to be debatable, as these cases are often quite complex."FDA commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said in a "Fox & Friends" interview on Saturday that his agency would no longer "rubber-stamp things with no data," adding that such a "mockery of science" was alternatively "the M.O. in the Biden administration with the eternal COVID booster approvals for young, healthy kids."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'Predictably Pathetic': ABC News Earns a Ratio for Spin on What Could Have Motivated the DC Terrorist