Sit back, relax, and let’s Break It Down in episode 29...

The bridge is over 7 meters (25 feet) long and dates back at least 5,600 years.

The alphabet perverts are grooming another young child. A video of what appears to be a young boy scantily dressed as a girl broke the internet this week. The child is seen provocatively dancing on a stage, surrounded by half-naked grown adults shaking their naughty bits in his face.  ??BREAKING: This little boy is going viral for dancing in a shocking and provocative way at a drag queen party in Los Angeles. The young man can be seen doing hand stand splits and dancing with grown transgenders, men, and women while being cheered on by a crowd in this… pic.twitter.com/cIcSpo8JXF — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) August 29, 2024 It is difficult to tell which of the adult accomplices are men and who, if anyone present, is actually a woman. Multiple he/she’s are seen wearing nothing but bras, thongs with straps attached to high-heeled boots, and other lingerie.  Meanwhile, the child is flopping around in front of a cheering crowd, whilst wearing a women’s crop top. The X account criticizing the creep show insists no little girl “would be allowed to do this without her parents getting arrested.”

Vice President Kamala Harris sat down this week to field softball questions from a friendly liberal network after spending several weeks avoiding the fourth estate. In her interview Thursday with CNN's Dana Bash, Harris was afforded an opportunity to account for her mischaracterization of President Joe Biden's competency when it still benefited her to do so. Rather than admit fault, Harris doubled down and emphasized that she has no regrets. "You were a very staunch defender of President Biden's capacity to serve another four years right after the debate," said Bash. "You insisted that President Biden is 'extraordinarily strong.'" After Biden's disastrous debate with President Donald Trump on June 27, Harris told CNN host Anderson Cooper, "Yes, there was a slow start, but it was a strong finish. And what became very clear through the course of the night is that Joe Biden is fighting on behalf of the American people. On substance, on policy, on performance, Joe Biden is extraordinarily strong." When Cooper gently pushed back, highlighting anxiety among congressional Democrats over Biden's performance, Harris responded, "People can debate on style points, but ultimately this election and who is the president of the United States has to be about substance. And the contrast is clear." Bash asked Harris on Thursday, "Given where we are now, do you have any regrets about what you told the American people?" "No. Not at all," said Harris. "I have served with President Biden for almost four years now, and I'll tell you: It's one of the greatest honors of my career. Truly." 'Joe Biden is very much alive.' "He is so smart and loyal to the American people," continued Harris. "I have spent hours upon hours with him, be it in the Oval Office or the Situation Room. He has the intelligence, the commitment, and the judgment, and disposition that I think the American people rightly deserve in their president." CNN panelists later spun Harris' long-standing mischaracterization of Biden's abilities as the result of "loyalty" and "grace." The Trump campaign, on the other hand, said of Harris' admitted lack of remorse: "She lied to the American people as she perpetuated a massive, wide-reaching fraud — until it was no longer tenable." Harris' post-debate spin earlier this summer was hardly the first time she tried to firm up public confidence in Biden's abilities. He gave critics and allies alike cause to worry in recent years with his evident difficulty completing sentences; heavy reliance on cue cards; struggles to stay upright; repetition of the same debunked anecdote nearly word for word, in short succession; confusion of the living for the dead, his sister for his wife, and the names of disparate nations; apparent need to spend roughly 40% of his presidency out of office; identification as a proud black woman; and his apparent need for former President Barack Obama as an escort. When asked in September 2023 whether Biden was too old to run again, Harris told reporters, "Joe Biden is going to be just fine," reported Reuters. "Joe Biden is going to be fine. Let me tell you something: I work with Joe Biden every day," added Harris. Harris was asked in an October 2023 "60 Minutes" interview what would happen in the event that something should "befall President Biden, and he is not able to run." Harris answered, "Joe Biden is very much alive and running for election." In February, Harris condemned special counsel Robert Hur's report about Biden's handling of sensitive classified information, which suggested that the Democratic president had a "poor memory" and was possibly too senile to charge. She called the report "gratuitous, inaccurate and inappropriate." Harris told reporters that contrary to Hur's characterization, Biden was capable — "in front of and on top of it all." "The way that the president's demeanor in that report was characterized could not be more wrong on the facts and clearly politically motivated," added Harris. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Ask a friend who hates former President Donald Trump to put aside any outrage over the Jan. 6 riot and explain just what was so awful about his four years in the White House. All but the most addicted political junkies will struggle to answer. We can all remember that there were daily scandals and weekly outrages, but what were they again? There’s the silly Belleau Wood story, which was debunked by on-the-record, Trump-hating witnesses. Then there’s building the wall on the southern border, which is now among the Democrats’ campaign promises. And then maybe the “fine people” thing? Though that’s been thoroughly debunked as well. Just one more breaking news banner and one more special report has become just one more blip. No one can clearly remember because it was all so fake. Faux media outrage served fresh every hour in exchange for ratings boosts. Outlets like CNN became addicted to the high. Remember that reporter screaming at Trump about Russia (or was it Ukraine?) at the annual White House Easter Egg Roll? The ratings have never recovered since the Bad Orange Man left. The insanity began right away. Right after Trump won, reporters accused the president-elect of murdering the First Amendment for sneaking away from his press pool to grab a steak with the family. It never let up from there, ranging from the silly to the stupid. Red Christmas decorations? That’s racist. Ask NATO allies to meet treaty obligations? That’s treason. One newspaper-style writer said his music playlist was “fascist.” They’re at it again. On the third anniversary of America’s deeply embarrassing withdrawal from Afghanistan, the corporate media wants to mark the occasion by saying Trump violated the dignity of Arlington Cemetery by accepting an invitation from Gold Star parents whose children were killed in the sloppy retreat. Gold Star parents, mind you, who have never received a call from the sitting president and whose only meeting was on the tarmac, where he repeatedly checked his watch while accepting their sons and daughters. These same parents asked for the media to come. They wanted the moment “respectfully captured.” That didn’t stop the bureaucrats in the military from condemning the whole affair. You’ll notice no one complained when Biden was captured in the exact same section of the cemetery. Nor when he used footage from his visit to a U.S. military cemetery in France in a political ad against Trump (one that repeated the Belleau Wood fraud). To the corporate left-wing media, the real scandal is “Trump” and “norms.” The same thing we’ve been hearing now for eight years; the same line used to explain how global standing and prestige would return if we just got rid of Trump and replaced him with, well, the guy who turned the long-overdue withdrawal from Afghanistan into a televised global embarrassment. Examples abound. How about that time Trump went to a town that was apparently a racist town, whatever that is? Well, it turned out President Joe Biden had gone to the same little town a few years earlier, so the press dropped the story. But it doesn’t seem to be working any more. No one cares. Just one more breaking news banner and one more special report has become just one more blip. Just a little white noise. Blaze News: Days after RFK Jr. signaled desire to ‘Make America Healthy Again,’ Time issues defense of ultra-processed foods Blaze News: MSNBC’s Ari Melber locks down his X account after falsely accusing Corey Lewandowski of misquoting him in on-air meltdown Sign up for Bedford’s newsletter Sign up to get Blaze Media senior politics editor Christopher Bedford's newsletter.

The Biden-Harris administration’s Department of Homeland Security announced Thursday that it plans to restart one of its controversial immigration programs — referred to as CHNV — that was briefly paused after the discovery of rampant fraud.The administration’s CHNV program allows 30,000 individuals per month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela to immigrate to the United States. Beneficiaries are flown into the country and provided with a two-year work permit. 'A massive shell game.'Applicants must pass a vetting process and have a U.S.-based sponsor to be eligible for the program.A report by the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate found fraud among the sponsors’ applications. Some sponsors used the same social security numbers, addresses, and phone numbers hundreds of times. Roughly 3,000 sponsors had filed more than 100,000 forms. The internal report found instances in which sponsors used phone numbers belonging to deceased individuals, addresses of storage units, and fake zip codes. As a result, the DHS stated that it paused the program in mid-July “out of an abundance of caution.”Approximately a month and a half later, the Biden-Harris administration has decided to restart the program, claiming that additional safeguards have been implemented.A DHS spokesperson said it will conduct “additional vetting” of sponsors, including assigning two subagencies to investigate “financial records and criminal background.”According to the spokesperson, most cases included errors or other application oversights, and only a small number of sponsors were responsible for committing fraudulent activity.House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-Tenn.), a strong critic of the “clearly flawed” program, slammed the administration for continuing the immigrant flights, which he views as illegal.He accused the DHS of not “rooting out the fraud or putting adequate safeguards in place to prevent exploitation by sponsors.”“It should come as no surprise that the Biden-Harris administration has rushed to restart its unlawful CHNV mass-parole scheme, despite the clear evidence of fraud permeating the program,” Green continued. “The CHNV program, along with the use of the CBP One app at the Southwest border, has helped the president and his border czar play a massive shell game, encouraging otherwise-inadmissible aliens to simply cross at ports of entry instead of between them.”“But fundamentally, there would be no fraud to prevent if DHS simply stopped importing 30,000 inadmissible aliens every month in the first place,” Green added.A DHS spokesperson reported that Border Patrol encountered 98% fewer illegal aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela since December 2022, the New York Post reported.Green and National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd have called the Biden-Harris administration’s CHNV program a “bait and switch.”Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has shocked the world with his complete 180-degree reversal on the subject of government control over virtual platforms. In 2018, he was gung ho on government overreach. But now … not so much. In a recent letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the tech mogul outs the Biden administration for "repeatedly pressuring" Meta to censor COVID-19 posts and squash the "laptop from hell" story about Hunter Biden in 2021. Rumor has it Zuckerberg might be trying to align himself with Donald Trump as the likelihood of his return to power swells. Is the tech giant’s sudden change of heart authentic? Or is he simply reversing course to match the shifting political tides? Pat Gray and the “Unleashed” team discuss the situation. - YouTube www.youtube.com “It was every dissenting voice,” corrects Pat, noting that social media censorship went far beyond ridding the internet of COVID narratives and Hunter Biden chatter. But despite being asked point-blank if the administration was pressuring social media companies to shut down free speech, Jen Psaki, who was Biden’s press secretary at the time, stated: “We don’t shut anything down. We don’t block anything. Our point is that there is information that is leading to people not taking the vaccine, and people are dying as a result. And we have a responsibility as a public health matter to raise that issue.” “So the answer is yes,” Pat translates, making the point that while the government may not have taken down information itself, it bullied social media platforms with “or else” ultimatums. And now, the reality of government censorship has come to light in Zuckerberg’s admission. While many are excited about the Meta CEO’s reversal, Pat isn’t convinced it’s a genuine change of heart. “Why now?” he asks. Could it be because Zuckerberg is simply playing the tune of the administration he believes is next in line? After all, he is “the guy who's been begging for government regulation on the internet forever.” To hear more, watch the clip above. Want more from Pat Gray?To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz (D-Minn.) sat down for their first interview Thursday afternoon, with CNN’s Dana Bash, aired later that night. What we got was a soft Donald Trump platform. Interesting stuff from a literal San Francisco Democrat. The campaign sold a dual interview with a friendly network, which signals softballs about how they met and interacted. But the campaign may have waited too long to give the press a bite at the apple, and Dana (that’s Dan-ah — new CNN employees are instructed that she hates “Day-na”) virtually blocked Walz out of the 18-minute interview, directing her questions almost entirely toward the top of the ticket. The takeaway is that Harris looked all right in a populist skinsuit. Those questions weren’t underhand pitches, either. She asked about flip-flops and her incumbency, and when she spoke to Walz, she asked about the repeated lies he’s told about his military service and his family’s fertility treatments to advance his political career. Harris made it through the drizzle (it was no storm) clinging to Donald Trump’s playbook, promising to complete the wall, bring industry back to the United States, and expand the child tax credit, among others. When it was finally Walz’s turn, he went deeper into Republican lore, pulling out Rep. Richard Nixon’s vice presidential playbook and talking about his family dog. Amazing stuff. While Bash asked some solid questions, her pushback was soft, and worse yet, CNN only aired portions of the 18-minute interview and played clips interspersed between what could have been Democrat informercials (including a segment on a “viral photo” from the Democratic National Convention no one I know had ever seen). The takeaway, however, is that Harris looked all right in a populist skinsuit. If you don’t know her, you might buy it. She barely cackled, her weird head nod tic was largely (and studiously) held at bay, and she made it through. Republicans betting that she would self-destruct either here or on the debate stage in 11 days got word that she will not. She's a real opponent now, no matter the lore behind her rise, and Trump will have to beat her on his own turf. Blaze News: Selling the new Kamala Spectator: Kamala Harris' ‘Frankenstein’ campaign Sign up for Bedford’s newsletter Sign up to get Blaze Media senior politics editor Christopher Bedford's newsletter.

FATALITY! Megyn Kelly CURB-STOMPS CNN's Kamala Harris (Tim Walz) Interview Lie-By-BLATANT-Lie

Yup, She Went There: THIS Was Kamala's WORST Moment During CNN Interview and Folks, It's a DOOZY (WATCH)