The Trump campaign has reportedly requested to use military planes and vehicles in the final weeks of the race to increase security measures for the former president. 

After the disastrous reign of the Harris-Biden administration, you would think Harris would back off the failed economic policies, but no, she is revving them up. When Harris proposes new ideas, they are bad, more of the same, and unwelcome. She fully supports Bidenomics and wants to continue it and make it worse. Harris’s economic […] The post Harris’s Economic Spox Eviscerated on CNBC by a Democrat appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Drew Barrymore and Jimmy Fallon are reliving their Fever Pitch days. Drew released a clip of her new upcoming episode of The Drew Barrymore Show in which she and Fallon spent some time reminiscing. The dynamic duo shared secrets about some behind-the-scenes moments from this epic film. Drew Barrymore Shares Some Behind-The-Scenes Moments From “Fever Pitch” In an Instagram clip, Drew Barrymore and Jimmy Fallon discussed the end of the movie. Apparently, the ending we all saw, where the two share a romantic kiss on the field after the Red Sox win, was not the original ending. View this post on Instagram A post shared by The Drew Barrymore Show (@thedrewbarrymoreshow) PEOPLE Magazine shared the original ending of the film. “The Red Sox were supposed to lose since they hadn’t won in real life…The film was initially meant to conclude with the stars’ characters dressing as old people in the future when the Sox finally win.” However, while they were filming the strangest thing happened. Jimmy Fallon recalled that while they were at the Red Sox game, they witnessed baseball history. Although the Red Sox hadn’t won in 86 years, their luck was about to change. He said, “This is baseball history; as we’re filming this film, they make it into the wild card. Then they make it into the playoffs.” Jimmy Fallon described it as “the most magical year.” Even More Hilarious Moments Along with revealing that the ending was different, Drew Barrymore also shared some secret information about how Fever Pitch affected her personal life. When chatting with Jimmy Fallon, she recalled all the cameras at the game. She said, “And we happen to have cameras at every single one of these games.” She continued explaining how Fox Sports allowed them to use their cameras to film because they didn’t want movie cameras on the field. Although Jimmy Fallon asked them not to air any footage because no one knew of the movie yet, someone dropped the ball. Barrymore explained, “My boyfriend at the time, Fabrizio Moretti, is watching the series finale of the Red Sox, and there we are on the field kissing.” What a sight to see that must have been! Don’t worry, Drew! We’re sure it all made sense once Fever Pitch premiered. This story’s featured image is by Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images for Variety. The post Drew Barrymore Makes Sweet Admission While Chatting With Former “Fever Pitch” Co-Star Jimmy Fallon appeared first on InspireMore.

'A sound dollar'

'She is wholly unqualified to be President'

Within minutes of Hamas jihadists breaching the Israeli border on Oct. 7, 2023, and commencing the largest slaughter of the Jewish people since the Holocaust, Western leftists and other defenders of the genocidal Palestinian-Arab cause rallied around a talking point: “This did not occur in a vacuum.” The claim—blithely offered by armchair revolutionaries without even acknowledging the many hundreds of butchered babies, sadistically tortured families, raped women, and young music festivalgoers taken hostage—was that Israel had somehow impelled the horrific rampage on its own civilians. Those with a functioning moral compass recognize this as obvious terrorist apologia. Reflecting back one year later on the Hamas massacre and the current Middle East imbroglio, in which Israel is now fighting a seven-front war, however, I wonder whether the terrorist apologists may have had a point. That is not to suggest that these moral monsters were in any way whatsoever correct to justify, defend, or praise a pogrom so barbaric that it would have made Heinrich Himmler blush. But the mini-jihadists were correct to suggest there was a broader geopolitical context to the massacre—just a totally different one than what they had in mind. The actually relevant context was the weak, failed, and Iran-emboldening foreign policy of former President Barack Obama, President Joe Biden, and Vice President Kamala Harris. As Americans get ready to select our next commander in chief, the stark contrast between the failed foreign policy of successive Democratic administrations and the successful foreign policy of the interregnum Republican administration, that of former and perhaps future President Donald Trump, is instructive. The basic Obama-Biden-Harris foreign policy doctrine is simple: Reward America’s enemies and punish America’s friends. Obama famously sought to create “daylight” between the U.S. and Israel, America’s most dependable and national interest-aligned Middle East ally. He removed a bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office—a symbolic slap in the face to the United Kingdom, with which America has (had?) a “special relationship.” He emboldened the Islamist fanatics in Tehran, bamboozling a skeptical American public with his wretched nuclear accord and even secretly sending $400 million in wooden pallets of cash to the mullahs. The Biden-Harris administration has doubled down on every count: It has been the most anti-Israel administration since Israel’s founding in 1948; it has lavished the mullahs with billions in ransom payments and sanction waivers; and it has continued the Obama-Biden administration’s mollycoddling of America’s Chinese Communist Party civilizational archfoe. The results of the Obama-Biden-Harris foreign policy doctrine have been catastrophic. Across both Democratic administrations, we have witnessed unprecedented Islamist fanaticism and murderous jihadism across the Middle East, Russian President Vladimir Putin invading Ukraine twice (in both 2014 and 2022), a Chinese military that feels free to brazenly intimidate core American allies like Japan and the Philippines, and the emergence more generally of a breathtaking Chinese global footprint—from the sprawling Eurasian “Belt and Road Initiative” to Beijing’s menacing military presence in our own hemisphere. This is an abominable track record. The basic Trump foreign policy doctrine is equally simple but the opposite: Reward America’s friends and punish America’s enemies. Trump was by far the most pro-Israel president in American history: He moved the U.S. Embassy to its rightful home in Jerusalem, recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, defunded anti-Israel U.N. bodies, and much more. Trump was also, by just as far, the most anti-Iran president since the Islamic Revolution overthrew Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in 1979. His secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, bankrupted the mullahs, isolating and sanctioning them for all their malign activities. He restored America’s warm relations with the nationalist, non-Islamist Sunni Arab states, such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain. He was, notwithstanding Russia collusion hoax-induced hysteria to the contrary, very tough on Russian President Vladimir Putin. He became the first president since Richard Nixon’s fateful 1972 visit to Beijing to fundamentally reorient U.S.-China relations—for the better. The results of the Trump foreign policy doctrine were tremendous. The Iranian regime was contained and, due to oil export sanctions, near the brink of insolvency. There was transformative, generational Middle East peace in the form of the Abraham Accords between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. European nations paid their fair share toward NATO, and Putin was kept at bay. American relations with Japan and India thrived, while Chinese President Xi Jinping was restrained. The contrast could not possibly be clearer. I saw Trump speak Monday evening in Doral, Florida, on the anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas massacre. Trump emphasized that the massacre would never have happened if he were president. He is correct on that score. And to that extent, it is thus true that the pogrom “did not occur in a vacuum.” The American people could not ask for a clearer electoral contrast. Choose wisely. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post How Oct. 7 Underscores Stark Foreign Policy Choice Voters Face appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Kamala? Don't Worry. She's 'In Excellent Health'

Last week, CBS Saturday Morning ran a glowing profile of far-left activist and celebrity Jane Fonda. This week, it was former Bill Clinton strategist James Carville’s turn as co-host Michelle Miller claimed he “laid aside party loyalty” to urge President Biden to drop his re-election bid and viewed winning as his "religion."  Miller, whose husband was the former Democratic mayor of New Orleans and is the current president of the National Urban League, began in studio by declaring that, “James Carville is a one-of-a kind personality full of candor and political force for decades. But now, he's bringing viewers behind closed doors in a deeply personal new documentary for CNN just in time for another presidential election.”     In the featured report, she elaborated, “His wicked wit and combative style... have made him one of the most outspoken voices of our time.” Miller further described Carville as “a progressive pit bull, some say helped form the tone of cable news talk.” However, “earlier this year, James Carville laid aside party loyalty and sounded the alarm for President Biden to drop out.” That’s not what “laid aside party loyalty” means. If Carville really laid aside party loyalty, he would’ve endorsed Donald Trump. Instead, he simply wanted another Democrat with a better chance of winning. Still, Miller told him, “You seem to have predicted what we've seen this entire summer,” to which Carville replied, “Well, I guess it's fortunate sometimes to make a big call right in the middle of the film.” In a voiceover, Miller explained, “That film, Carville: Winning is Everything, Stupid also recounts his four decades in politics.” Again substituting statements for questions, Miller declared, “Someone said of you ‘that the path to victory is his religion. That's what he cares about: winning.’” Carville answered, “Right. I was obsessed with winning because you would hear this -- there were a lot of Democrats and kind of progressive people that wanted to feel good about themselves. ‘Oh, we were just way ahead of our times, and no one could appreciate us.’ That doesn't do any good. That's [bleep]. If you don't win, you've nothing.” If a Republican said “winning is everything,” we would be subject to lectures about misinformation or about the decline of morality in politics. When the former Clinton operative says it, it is deemed to be part of his charm, “We first saw that fervor in The War Room, a film chronicling Carville's 1992 presidential campaign to elect a relatively unknown governor from Arkansas, a victory that put Democrats back in the Oval Office for only the second time in 24 years.” It would have been nice if Miller asked Carville if he had any regrets about this “religion,” but this is CBS, and asking left-wing guests those types of questions is frowned upon. Here is a transcript for the October 12 show: CBS Saturday Morning 10/12/2024 9:09 AM ET MICHELLE MILLER: James Carville is a one-of-a kind personality full of candor and political force for decades. But now, he's bringing viewers behind closed doors in a deeply personal new documentary for CNN just in time for another presidential election. JAMES CARVILLE [1992]: And President Bush has been a do-nothing president, and now he's a do-nothing candidate. That's the way a political strategist thinks. MILLER: His wicked wit and combative style. CARVILLE: Go ask them what they think about it. I'm a political strategist. MILLER: Have made him one of the most outspoken voices of our time.  Mr. Carville, how are you? CARVILLE: Mister? I like that.  MILLER: A progressive pit bull, some say helped form the tone of cable news talk. CARVILLE [2004]: Iraq is getting more violent by the day, and we've been there forever and the thing is going to hell in a handbasket. MILLER: But, earlier this year, James Carville laid aside party loyalty and sounded the alarm for President Biden to drop out. CARVILLE: Somebody better wake the [bleep] Up. He's going to come to the conclusion that this is just not a good idea. MILLER: You seem to have predicted what we've seen this entire summer. CARVILLE: Well, I guess it's fortunate sometimes to make a big call right in the middle of the film. MILLER: That film, Carville: Winning is Everything, Stupid-- CARVILLE: Hey, give me a call when you get a chance. MILLER: Also recounts his four decades in politics. Someone said of you “that the path to victory is his religion. That's what he cares about: winning.” CARVILLE: Right. I was obsessed with winning because you would hear this -- there were a lot of Democrats and kind of progressive people that wanted to feel good about themselves. “Oh, we were just way ahead of our times, and no one could appreciate us." That doesn't do any good. That's [bleep]. If you don't win, you've nothing. MILLER: We first saw that fervor in The War Room, a film chronicling Carville's 1992 presidential campaign to elect a relatively unknown governor from Arkansas. CARVILLE [1992]: Let me tell you what's at stake in this election. MILLER: A victory that put Democrats back in the Oval Office for only the second time in 24 years. CARVILLE: Talk about things that matter to people. It's the economy, stupid. MILLER: Carville's simplicity and turning of phrase struck a chord with voters, and today, remains one of the most quoted slogans in politics.