YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #music #militarymusic #virginia #armymusic #armyband
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Go LIVE! Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

A golden opportunity to highlight Biden’s blunders: September
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

A golden opportunity to highlight Biden’s blunders: September

Imagine if Republicans were to seize a pivotal moment to engage in a sustained national debate over issues like inflation, crime, national security threats, and the costs associated with Joe Biden’s border policies. No political analyst would suggest that Democrats could withstand such focused scrutiny on top national concerns where a supermajority of voters oppose Biden’s policies.So, instead of avoiding a budget fight in September, why not confront it head-on? The timing of September 30, right as early voting begins, could be strategically ideal for a budget fight over the border. Why not leverage your strongest advantage when it matters the most?It is political malpractice to employ a 'run out the clock' strategy based on the uneducated belief we’ve got this election in the bag.Many of us have lamented how Republicans in recent months have given up every leverage point on every must-pass bill for the remainder of Biden’s term. But that assertion is not technically true. As the fiscal year 2024 budget capitulation played out well into the new year, we are just a few months away from the deadline for 2025 government funding, which comes due on September 30. None of us ever viewed fiscal year 2025 as a factor based on the assumption that Republicans would never risk a government shutdown fight right before the election.But shouldn’t the assumption be the exact opposite?Why wouldn’t Republicans want to hang the border invasion funding over the Democrats’ heads precisely as people are beginning to vote? After all, we are not discussing a budget fight defunding Social Security or popular programs people rely upon. We are talking about the funding for a foreign invasion of squatters, gang members, murderers, rapists, and, increasingly, Middle Eastern terrorists and military-age Chinese men.Republicans have enough news stories to inundate a government-funding debate with so many damning consequences of the Biden invasion that Democrats would either need to relent or suffer electoral blowback. Even 42% of Democratic voters support mass deportation. Simply turning back new invaders would easily garner supermajority support.The fact nobody is pushing this strategy exposes the mistake conservatives, including Trump, are making with this election. Trump has been politically matriculated into the establishment way of thinking: We merely need to run out the clock on the election, give Democrats everything they want, and avoid any intra-party fights and drama. Once he wins the election, then we will somehow fix everything. This explains why Trump is backing Mike Johnson’s speakership and strategy of “clearing the decks” of any leverage and why he is endorsing every down-ballot establishment candidate in the primaries.But the strategy wrongly assumes that Trump is a shoo-in and that we don’t need to make any big plays to win. While it’s certainly possible for him to beat Biden, it is quite bizarre — given the losing streak since the 2017 Virginia elections — that we would assume we are sitting on an insurmountable lead and therefore opt for the “run out the clock” strategy.Have we learned nothing from the 2022 elections? Or nearly every special election since then? Or the Wisconsin Supreme Court elections? Or the Pennsylvania Supreme Court elections? Is nobody the least bit curious why Democrats won in 2022 and continue to win most contentious special elections?The polls are internally conflicting and all over the map. They predicted a massive GOP wave in 2022, yet for the first time ever (aside from after 9/11) the party in the White House won the midterms, even in the midst of a terrible economy. Why would we assume things will change on their own by repeating the same lazy and complacent “look at the polls” mantra while refusing to pick any policy fights?To understand why it’s imperative for Trump to demand a border fight on the budget, it’s instructive to examine why Republicans continue to lose elections.The current electoral climate truly defies 200 years of history. Typically, the party occupying the White House always loses the midterm elections to varying degrees, even if the world is relatively tranquil and the economy is humming and the incumbent president is charismatic and well-liked. Think of 2010 and 1994 as examples of when Republicans crushed the midterms against well-liked presidents — despite much less political and cultural malaise — because of blowback to radical Democrat policies.Yet, here we are with an incontinent, dementia-ridden president, record affordability problems, a border invasion, rising crime, and a litany of radical policies that clearly don’t poll well with swing voters, and still Democrats remain ahead in nearly every Senate race.Every conservative should ask how Republicans managed to lose in 2022 (and most elections since) rather than making the wave elections of 1994 and 2010 look like red ripples? Unless and until that question is answered, it is political malpractice to employ a “run out the clock” strategy based on the uneducated belief we’ve got this election in the bag because “this time is different.”What should be clear, based on the dichotomy between Democrats’ poor polling on issues and job approval versus their electoral success, is that we are failing to bring these auspicious political issues to the forefront of voters’ minds. The modern Republican Party is struggling due to a combination of internal weakness, subversive elements, and the personal and image-related baggage of Trump, causing elections to become more about drama than substantive issues.Knowing that, the best way to focus the election on the issues that bedevil the Democrats would be to draw a line on our most popular issue during a budget fight just as voting begins.Wouldn’t Trump rather have a government shutdown over Biden refusing to relinquish funding for Venezuelan gangs and Middle Eastern terrorists crashing into our Marine base than a discussion over Stormy Daniels or his latest court hearing?If we continue to stand for nothing and do nothing to highlight Biden’s unpopular policies, voters will remain exactly where they are, and Republicans will lose yet again.Democrats have superior ground game, a first-rate mail-in-ballot and early-voting operation, and they are outspending Republicans by a mile in nearly every race. Unless Republicans make a big play and win over enough suburban swing voters who care about safety and security, they are unlikely to overcome the built-in blue firewall on the ground that has defied political science during recent elections.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Pride Month evangelists defy nature’s design
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Pride Month evangelists defy nature’s design

In recent years, June has been transformed from the start of summer to a 30-day quasi-religious celebration of all things related to LGBTQIA+ “pride.” The same people who spent the last few weeks chastising an NFL kicker for praising his wife in a commencement speech have no problem forcing the entire country to celebrate kids who want to cut off their genitals. Corporate logos, school districts, government agencies, professional sports leagues, and media outlets all change their logos and post materials signaling their allegiance to the “virtue” of pride. The critics of homemaking have no issue with sexual evangelicalism. Self-worship is a dead-end religion. No amount of slick wordplay can change the fact that man is not God. June is also the month when the left’s most important sacrament was dealt a major blow. The Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade was handed down on June 24, 2022. For pro-life groups, it was a cause for celebration. But for the party of child sacrifice, the decision led to a perverse performance of biblical sorrow, complete with torn garments as well as weeping and the gnashing of teeth. One of the lessons that every American, particularly Christians, should have learned in the last decade is that human beings are religious by nature. We can’t help but worship someone or something. The secularists who attack Christianity as a regressive and hateful religion are far more aggressive with their evangelical outreach than the average churchgoer. The recent story out of Florida about a manhunt for a driver who profaned a sacred symbol of the left is one example. Surveillance video shows someone doing donuts on a large Pride flag mural painted on the street. This apparently was taken as a sign of disrespect to the favorite religion of the regime. A local group of leaders, including members of the clergy, gathered to declare it an act of hate. Somehow, I doubt they would be nearly as protective or defensive if someone tore down an American flag and set it on fire. John Adams, one of the nation’s founding fathers, famously remarked, “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Politicians and pundits never seem to ask what you get when a nation is made up of immoral and religious people. Or put a different way, what do you get when a nation’s religion is one that demands child sacrifice and rejects the generational mandate to propagate the species? The answer is simple: death culture. Anti-natalism and pro-gender-confusion are expected outcomes from an ideology untethered from our Creator. People who deem themselves too sophisticated to worship God inevitably engage in the worship of self. They may cloak their idolatry in the language of intellectualism, but the truth is plain to see. What makes these developments so dangerous is how quickly and thoroughly our culture has been converted. We live in an age where cultural tastemakers and corporate news breakers inform the public – with a straight face – that men can get pregnant. But self-worship is a dead-end religion. And no amount of slick wordplay can change the fact that man is not God. People who know nothing about automobile design marvel at the attention to detail in every aspect of a high-end vehicle. Everything from the paint job and high-end leather interior to the souped-up engine and responsive steering are a testament to the designer’s attention to detail. No one would ever suggest that such a magnificent creation came together by chance. Likewise, no one would suggest that pushing the brake pedal makes the car go faster. But for some reason, we take this approach with human beings. You can infer function from the form of any creation, but purpose can only be established by its designer. Men and women have bodies that literally fit together like hand and glove. Sex is certainly pleasurable, but its primary purpose is for reproduction — within the bonds of marriage. The clerics of Pride reject God’s design and insist that their definitions of man, woman, and marriage should be treated with reverence. For all their adherence to evolution, progressives fail to see how their ideology leads to extinction. The good news is that this rebellion against God’s design and purpose for humanity will not last forever. Abomination appreciation month is only 30 days. Both the Bible and the calendar offer the same hope: Pride comes before the fall.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

LA crime 'Headlines' get no laughs from Leno
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

LA crime 'Headlines' get no laughs from Leno

Have progressives had enough yet?We’ve already seen several character actors get attacked on the mean streets of New York City, including Steve Buscemi of “The Sopranos” fame. “Saturday Night Live” even made an unfunny bit about it. (Does it make any other kind?)The City of Angels is no better.Los Angeles denizens have faced similar woes thanks to the city’s pillow-soft-on-crime rules. Recently, “General Hospital” actor Johnny Wactor died after confronting thieves attempting to steal his car’s catalytic converter.There’s more.Fellow actor Jonathan Tucker had to step in during a neighbor’s home invasion nightmare this week in Los Angeles. Luckily, no one was hurt, and Tucker proved heroic when the family in question needed him.Now, one of the most mainstream, apolitical souls is sounding the alarm over the sorry state of affairs.Jay Leno blasted L.A. officials for treating catalytic converter thefts like a misdemeanor, helping spark the current crime wave. Elections have consequences. Blind party loyalty does too.Will Smith's slap-happy slumpDoes Hollywood have another summer bummer on its hands?The industry is still reeling from the under-performing duo of “The Fall Guy” and “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga.” Who knew a Mad Max movie without Mad Max might struggle at the box office?Now, Deadline reports the fourth film in the “Bad Boys” series could join them. “Bad Boys: Ride or Die,” once again starring Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, could bring in as little as $30+ million.That just won’t do for an action-packed sequel that cost $100 million.This is Smith’s first populist film following “The Slap Heard ‘round the World,” and that will get some of the blame should “Ride or Die” underwhelm.Maybe.It could be a movie-going public exhausted by both endless sequels and sanctimonious stars. Or they’re willing to wait until the film hits VOD sooner than later. You can watch “Fall Guy” at home now and “Furiosa” by month’s end.Jon Stewart's moment of MAGA Jon Stewart said what a good progressive shouldn’t say. Again.Remember how much fire he took from fellow liberals when he suggested COVID-19, which began in Wuhan, China, may have been created in a virus research lab in Wuhan, China?He also got singed after he suggested President Joe Biden wasn’t the second coming of Abe Lincoln during his return to “The Daily Show” faux anchor chair.Now, he’s committing the ultimate far-left sin: admitting the legal system is rigged against Donald Trump.Stewart told fellow comedian Tom Segura that the system had to get rid of Trump one way or another.“Everything other than just have a better idea.”The 61-year-old retreated to his far-left talking points Monday on “The Daily Show.” Maybe he hoped his base wouldn’t see the Segura interview and miss a rare “truth to power” moment from the fading comic. Those comments still could go viral at the worst possible time for his party.Let’s hope so.Lupita Nyong'o's press junket hellOscar winners sure have it good. Fame. Fortune. Celebrity. Did we mention fortune?For Lupita Nyong’o of “12 Years a Slave” fame, there’s a downside, and it’s “a torture technique.”Waterboarding? Starvation? Watching a Hannah Gadsby special? No, it’s undergoing a day’s worth of interviews from a mostly fawning press. She recently whined about enduring press junkets, events where a star is questioned by dozens of journalists who come in waves from around the country, if not the world.“Different people are being ferried in … You have to give each one of them attention, focus, and an articulate answer that you just gave to the person before. That’s irritating.”There’s a grain of truth in what she said. This reporter participated in many press junkets in the early 2000s. Some of the questions posed were dumb. Others proved downright insipid.Still, complaining about irritating Q&As is like saying the cruise ship’s crème brûlée wasn’t as tart as the one from your favorite French bistro.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Wednesday Western: 'Cimarron' (1960)
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Wednesday Western: 'Cimarron' (1960)

HighbrowEdna Ferber’s novel "Cimarron" was published in 1930 as America sank lower into the Great Depression. "Cimarron" is high-brow art, with Pulitzer Prize-winning Ferber offering gorgeous, if not overwrought sentences like: “Lean hounds drowsed in the sun-drenched untidiness of the doorway, and that untidiness was hidden and transformed by a miracle of color and scent and bloom.”The nobodies of the world love tradition, while the cultural elites need constant renewal, even to the point of destruction.A year after the book’s release, RKO Radio Pictures Inc. purchased the rights to "Cimarron" and threw big money into the project.It's reception evinces a Hollywood paradox: The movie lost money and the general public didn’t care for it, but it was a hit among critics and industry elites. Despite being unpopular with audiences, "Cimarron" was also the first film to earn Academy Award nominations for each of the five big categories. It also became the first Western to win the Oscar for Best Picture, one of only four to have done so, none of which were made by John Ford. It would be another 60 years before another Western, "Dances with Wolves," earned the top prizeA decade later, MGM bought the film rights from RKO.The studio spent another 10 years trying to bring it to life, at one point casting Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor as Yancey and Sabra, the husband and wife at the heart of "Cimarron."They eventually landed on Glenn Ford, a kind of victory lap after his performance in "3:10 to Yuma" (1957). The two-decade delay placed the remake in 1960, for better or worse because 1960 was a teenager year for the Western movie genre: hints of rebellion, annoyance with the status quo, eagerness to impose its youth. We were closer to movies like Sam Peckinpah’s "The Deadly Companions" (1961) and John Ford’s "How the West Was Won" (1962) and "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance" (1962) than we were to Ford’s "Stagecoach" (1939) or Delmer Daves’ "Broken Arrow" (1950).The Civil Rights movement offered a new chance for Ferber’s humane messaging to resonate. Where you can find itAmazon Prime - $3.99 to rentAppleTV - $3.99 to rentFandango at Home - $3.99 to rentYouTube - $3.99 to rentGoogle Play - $3.99 to rentMy Mann, Anthony"Cimarron" is an unusual choice as my first Anthony Mann Western. There’s disagreement about whether or not "Cimarron" even classifies as a Western. The sophistication of Ferber's work makes it deeply literary, like a slow-moving stage play. Chronologically, it extends past the cut-off for Westerns into a world with cars. Its tone is markedly feminine, emphasizing relationships and anxieties in a way that’s foreign to the genre. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a remarkable, stunning film, one well worth your time. But it’s also a bit of a slog. He was in the final third of his illustrious three-decade career. By then, he’d already built, and burned, multiple bridges, including the one joining him and Jimmy Stewart in friendship and artistic collaborationHe had cut his teeth making lean, low-budget B-films through the 1940s — the kind of gangster movies and cop dramas that established film noir as a revolutionary moment in cinema history. He built momentum into the 1950s with masterpieces like "The Furies" (1950) and "Winchester ‘73" (1950) — every single movie referenced here will get an entry soon enough. During this phrase, he caught his stride with Westerns, beginning with the Stewart collaborations "Bend of the River" (1952), "The Naked Spur" (1953), "The Far Country" (1954), and "The Man from Laramie" (1955), which was to be the last time the duo worked together.He closed the decade with "The Tin Star" (1957), starring Henry Fonda, followed by "Man of the West" (1958), the Gary Cooper gem that critics hated until the Europeans began to praise it. Next, MGM enlisted Mann for a trio of epic films. The latter two were "El Cid" (1961), which features Charlton Heston as an 11th century warlord with Sophia Lauren at his side, and "The Fall of the Roman Empire" (1964), which also stars Lauren. The first was "Cimarron." The remake. MGM would throw even more money at the project than RKO had, shelling out for a thousand extras, 700 horses, and 500 wagons. More cameras. More fire. More explosions. More gunfire. More spectacle. Make it electric with Metrocolor, open the screen with Cinescope. They wanted big. Maximalist. Epic.Boomer SoonersIn the foreword to "Cimarron," Edna Ferber writes that “only the more fantastic and improbable events contained in this book are true,” adding that “there is no attempt to set down a literal history of Oklahoma.” She charts some of the research methods she used and reveals the balance of truth and fiction at work before returning to the openness of the territory she captures. “Anything can happen in Oklahoma,” she concludes. “Practically everything has.” "Cimarron," both the book and the films, is special to me in part because I’m an Okie, and I grew up learning about the events she dramatizes. The passage of the Indian Appropriations Act of 1889 opened up Indian territory to settlers. The subsequent feverish dash for land characterized the Oklahoma Land Rush of 1889, the first of seven homesteading races across wild territory, as 50,000 maniacs fought for each leap toward their stake of untouched land. They rushed however they could: unicycles, wagons, carriages, stagecoaches, ponies, mules.Two million acres of verdant land were up for grabs on the promise that the settlers would improve the territory they claimed. As we see in "Cimarron," this deal fell apart when all those rowdy adventurers wound up in the same makeshift towns. Revolver-wielding brutes spilled out of the saloons, itching for someone to shoot. It’s a familiar human outcome, this teenage habit of going overboard with freedom. Then, there’s the next stage: darkness. Outbursts, violence, even lynchings, the the most cowardly type of murder, which masquerade as last-ditch justice. The shadowIn the realm of the Western, such evildoings rarely go unavenged. The hero often appears no different from the deviants, capable of all the same tricks and gunplay, as quick and ruthless in combative endurance. There are a million variations of this shadowy hero, one of the most prominent figures throughout the Western genre — from the earliest silent movies right up to contemporary films. Typically, this man, or woman, has a checkered past that they’re careful to hide. They belong to a story that you can’t drag out of them. Often, they’re hiding from fame, or infamy. But this effort inevitably fails, usually when they cross paths with old acquaintances who force them into combat.This wandering, mysterious redeemer almost always witnesses the injustice of a new world and resolves to do something about it, which is never as easy as it sounds, and never as bloodless.Yancey Cravat’s golden voiceIn "Cimarron," this shadowy figure is hypnotic and peculiar, at odds with the status quo. His name is Yancey Cravat, although townsfolk suspect it's an alias. In the 1960 remake, Yancey is played by Glenn Ford. Sabra is played by Maria Schell with her beautiful Austrian purr. A hulking man with a surprising bounce of grace and ease, Yancey is possibly the greatest criminal lawyer of his day, “a bizarre, glamourous, and slightly mythical figure,” who entranced Sabra Venable, prized daughter of Felice Venable, with the musicality of his voice and the mysterious reach of his warmth and the hypnotic dance of his slim, pliant hands. An actor; a fanatic; a charlatan with eyes that are “a deep and unfathomable gray,” Yancey rattles off passages from Shakespeare, the Bible, and "The Odyssey."His origins are unknown, but it appears that he came from Texas and Cimarron — his son’s name is “Cim.” Rumors and gossip did the rest of the work, with whispers that Yancey had Indian lineage, that his real name was in fact Cimarron, a Spanish word meaning “wild or unruly.” He wooed Sabra right into marriage.Ferber uses her feminine tone to describe Sabra: “Twenty-one now, married at 16, mother of a four-year-old boy, and still in love with her picturesque giant of a husband, there was about Sabra Cravat a bloom, a glow, something seen at that exquisite and transitory time in a woman’s life when her chemical, emotional, and physical make-up attains its highest point and fuses.” Like Ferber’s novel, "Cimarron" starts as an ornamental film, an escapade of high society. We begin deep within the civilized boredom of Kansas City. The characters are extravagant, bold, eloquent, sophisticated. They might as well be ancient gods, empty figurations of pure status. In the novel, Ferber tells us that, while the Venables transplanted from Mississippi to Kansas two decades earlier, “the mid-west had failed to set her bourgeois stamp upon them.” Yancey convinces Sabra to leave her station among the gentry of the South so that they can chase the dream of wide-open land, the prospect of a new kingdom.Before long, the hedges and exclusivity will vanish underneath a stampede. Bare lifeSeparated from her well-to-do family, all puffy with the elaborate clothing of the upper class, Sabra is reduced to bare life. Our one-time daughter of privilege finds herself shivering in fear, clinging naked to the ridge of a pond as hyena teenagers heckle her, only for her husband, Yancey, to side with these rapacious losers. “How do you know these drunk pests?”This is Sabra’s first glimpse at the hidden machinery of Yancey Cravat. The farther they get into the territory, the wilder he gets. He fights bare-fisted when the situation calls to the crowd for a real man. He howls, he smiles differently than Sabra has ever seen. All the prostitutes know him, the entire wagon of singing whores. With each new revelation, Sabra learns both more but knows less, fetching the truth from the man she loves without destroying his enigmatic prowess.Will he keep getting wilder? Can he ever be tamed? This lingering pursuit follows Sabra over the years, offering a view of the institution of the family. A sprawling castRuss Tamblyn shines as the Cherokee Kid. Who could have guessed that he would eventually become father-in-law to one of the most iconic comedians of the last 20 years, David Cross, as seen in "Mr. Show," "Arrested Development," and "Scary Movie 2."Vic Morrow makes an appearance — two decades later, while filming a wartime scene for "Twilight Zone: The Movie," a helicopter hovering overhead spiraled, killing Morrow and two child actors with him. There’s Harry Morgan, who charted out a career over the course of nearly 70 years with beloved roles in "Dragnet" and "M*A*S*H."There’s William Edgar Buchanan II, who played Uncle Joe Carson in "The Beverly Hillbillies." And just like the Beverly Hillbillies, the Okies in Cimarron struck oil. Glenn and MariaBehind the scenes, there was a different kind of land-grab taking place between the two lead actors, Maria Schell and Glenn Ford. At the time, Maria Schell was married to German actor/director Horst Hächler. The couple traveled from Austria only to discover that she’d been largely edited out of the film. Glenn Ford was married to actress and dancer Eleanor Powell. Ford was a notorious womanizer, a compulsive cheater. Ford and Schell snuck into an intense affair. You can tell throughout the movie. By the time of the premiere, however, this relationship had changed. Anne Baxter, who played Dixie Lee, described their dramatic fallout in her autobiography: "Ice had formed between Glenn Ford and Maria Schell for ugly private reasons, which didn't help. During shooting, they'd scrambled together like eggs. I understood she'd even begun divorce proceedings in Germany. It was obviously premature of her. Now, he scarcely glanced or spoke in her direction, and she looked as if she were in shock."Light breaks shadowYancey’s knack for retribution is markedly political. This political element is always interesting, and buoyant, with Westerns. In this case, the cast members were evenly spread throughout the political compass. Glenn Ford was a JFK Democrat at the time but would turn Republican with Reagan. L.Q. Jones was Republican, Methodist. Mary Wickes, an outspoken Republican. And the beautiful and gifted Anne Baxter, an enthusiastic Republican, was the granddaughter of Frank Lloyd Wright.Mercedes McCambridge, who voiced the demon in "The Exorcist," was a loud-and-proud liberal. Aline MacMahon had been blacklisted for having communist associations and spent much of the rest of her life being monitored by the FBI. And, perhaps most of all, Edna Ferber, the woman who wrote the story, was a liberal with a stir for revision. Ferber, who was Jewish, visited Europe throughout the 1920s and 1930s. She witnessed the rise of Nazism: “It was a fearful thing to see a continent – a civilization – crumbling before one's eyes. It was a rapid and seemingly inevitable process to which no one paid any particular attention."This explains her fascination with the idealism of homesteaders, who are often reckless, and her interest in the institution of the family, even though Ferber herself never got married or had children and is rumored to have been a lesbian. Does that make "Cimarron" an anti-Western? Because this distinction — between true-hearted Westerns and cynical Trojan Horses — is one of the clearest divisions among people who love Western art and film. This dynamic is similar to the Hollywood paradox we discussed above: The nobodies of the world love tradition while the cultural elites need constant renewal, even to the point of destruction. Because what are we really talking about when we attach terms like “anti-Western” to revolution-minded cultural movements? What claim do liberals have to a rare genre in which the general sentiment is conservative? It is conservative, right? Why else would the elitists who host the "Why Theory" podcast whine about how Westerns are “very problematic”? (We’ll get back to this idiotic notion in due time.) Sure, plenty of liberals enjoy Westerns, but why? These days, the liberal touch extends to every aspect of culture, with very few exceptions — "The Chosen," "Yellowstone," Mel Gibson. The loud and proud Hollywood conservative is gone. This has driven us into art that is lopsided, with no rest from the revolution and nobody to say, “Please, stop.” So, one of the questions I’m interested in with Wednesday Western, is “Why did American culture lose its political symmetry?” It’s certainly relevant to our pursuit: John Wayne and Walt Disney and Barbara Stanwyck and Gary Cooper and a dozen other A-list actors had communists on their heels in Hollywood, with the House Un-American Activities Committee tucked into their holster. Unlike today’s Hollywood conservatives, they were unflinchingly outspoken. Who’s laughing now? My main complaint is that "Cimarron" is humorless. This says a lot about Westerns as an art form, which is nuanced enough to lace comedy into its grand narrative. I don’t know whether there’s a single humorous moment in "Cimarron." In the only scene with laughter, it’s used to indicate that the postpartum mother has lost her mind. This lack of a comedic undercurrent is strange for Anthony Mann, who specializes in revealing emotions and impulses at their most raw. My suspicion is that the movie’s staid tone comes from Edna Ferber, who seems far more concerned in promoting social change than letting her audience bask in the breeze of enjoyment. A serious pursuit that demands everything from its host. This activist’s zeal is no laughing matter! Ride lonesomeUnderneath all of it, however, Anthony Mann was struggling, dissatisfied. When filming began, producer Edmund Grainger, an industry pro near the end of his career, forced Mann to film indoors. He wasn’t stingy about it: The entire city of Osage sprawled across 11 acres of land, over three sound stages, creating in the largest town set for a Western ever constructed by MGM.But landscapes and endless skies are fundamental to an Anthony Mann Western. How much compromise is too much? He was a restless man, perfectly willing to throw his hands up and leave if he felt he was being micromanaged. Which is what he did. The studio replaced him with an uncredited director. The final cut of "Cimarron" was a mess. Nearly two-and-a-half hours in length, it met the baseline qualifications for an Epic Western without actually being one. It all felt so ornamental. The film premiered in Oklahoma City on December 1, 1960, without much pageantry. It bombed among both critics and audiences, losing $3.6 million at the box office. The worst repudiation, though, came from Edna Ferber in letter to the New York Times: I received from this second picture of my novel not one single penny in payment. I can't even do anything to stop the motion-picture company from using my name in advertising so slanted that it gives the effect of my having written the picture ... I shan't go into the anachronisms in dialogue; the selection of a foreign-born actress ... to play the part of an American-born bride; the repetition; the bewildering lack of sequence ... I did see 'Cimarron' ... four weeks ago. This old gray head turned almost black during those two (or was it three?) hours.Anthony Mann never made another Western. Like so many of the characters he brought to life, he just vanished into the horizon. As Roy Rogers loved to say, “Goodbye, good luck, and may the good Lord take a liking to you. See ya next week.”
Like
Comment
Share
Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
1 y

Ex Dishonored and Deathloop dev drops demo for new Steam horror game
Favicon 
www.pcgamesn.com

Ex Dishonored and Deathloop dev drops demo for new Steam horror game

With games like Blade, Deathloop, Dishonored, and Crysis 4 under their belt, this storied developer just released a demo for their short, low-poly horror game Threshold. It'll make you anxious, it'll entrance you in its visuals, and best of all it's available on Steam right now. Continue reading Ex Dishonored and Deathloop dev drops demo for new Steam horror game MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best horror games, Upcoming PC games, Best single-player games
Like
Comment
Share
Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
1 y

Already divisive Ark remaster splits opinion again with monster DLC
Favicon 
www.pcgamesn.com

Already divisive Ark remaster splits opinion again with monster DLC

Ark: Survival Ascended is a remaster of the original Ark: Survival Evolved that came instead of the promised sequel, Ark 2. Unlike the beloved original, this remaster has split the community, and its latest update, that includes a single tameable creature as paid DLC, is only starting more arguments. Continue reading Already divisive Ark remaster splits opinion again with monster DLC MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best survival games, Best dinosaur games, Best co-op games
Like
Comment
Share
Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
1 y

Corsair’s new wood and white PC gaming desk looks gorgeous
Favicon 
www.pcgamesn.com

Corsair’s new wood and white PC gaming desk looks gorgeous

Corsair has shown off and announced a host of new hardware at its booth at Computex 2024, but one product that hasn't been mentioned at all that still caught our eye is the Corsair Platform:4 gaming desk. The new Corsair desk gets its name from the fact that it's just four feet wide rather than the six foot wide Platform:6. But perhaps more notably, the new smaller best gaming desk contender is available in an option other than black. Continue reading Corsair’s new wood and white PC gaming desk looks gorgeous MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Corsair HS80 Max headset review, Corsair M75 Air mouse review, Best gaming keyboard
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Alabama Mercedes-Benz Employees Declined to Unionize. The UAW May Win Anyway
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Alabama Mercedes-Benz Employees Declined to Unionize. The UAW May Win Anyway

With help from the Biden administration, the UAW could resort to legal trickery to reverse a unionization vote that didn’t go its way.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Lina Khan’s Amazon Flip-Flop
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Lina Khan’s Amazon Flip-Flop

Consumer welfare, not political agendas, should be the focus of antitrust agencies moving forward. 
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

De Niro’s Downfall (and Ours)
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

De Niro’s Downfall (and Ours)

The fall of a people’s movie star.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 58283 out of 89016
  • 58279
  • 58280
  • 58281
  • 58282
  • 58283
  • 58284
  • 58285
  • 58286
  • 58287
  • 58288
  • 58289
  • 58290
  • 58291
  • 58292
  • 58293
  • 58294
  • 58295
  • 58296
  • 58297
  • 58298
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund