YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #liberals #trafficsafety #assaultcar #carviolence #stopcars #notonemore #carextremism #endcarviolence #tennessee #bancarsnow #stopcrashing #pedestriansafety #tragedy #thinkofthechildren #memphis
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 y

Dead Trout Swimming And Pigeon Missiles – 2024 Ig Nobel Prizes Are Outrageous As Ever
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

Dead Trout Swimming And Pigeon Missiles – 2024 Ig Nobel Prizes Are Outrageous As Ever

Also, if you want to live to 100 your best shot is to be born somewhere without reliable birth certificates.
Like
Comment
Share
Strange & Paranormal Files
Strange & Paranormal Files
1 y

Supernatural or Pareidolia: 20-Foot “Alien” Spotted in Rocky Mountains
Favicon 
anomalien.com

Supernatural or Pareidolia: 20-Foot “Alien” Spotted in Rocky Mountains

In August 2024, two female tourists, Jessee Clauson and Camille Avarella, embarked on a 15-day climbing adventure in the Longs Peak area of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado. Their usual routine of posting scenic climbing photos on social media took an unexpected turn when they captured a bizarre image that quickly went viral. The photo, initially intended to showcase a beautiful morning landscape with a gray cloud hanging over the mountain, featured something unusual in the center—a strange, squiggly shape. When the image was enlarged, this “squiggle” revealed itself to be a thin, humanoid-like figure, seemingly clinging to the side of a steep cliff. Two hikers have been left stunned after encountering a frightening anomaly (a zoom on the specimen is pictured). Standing in stark contrast to the natural surroundings, the figure appeared to be around 20 feet tall (6 meters). Nothing similar had been seen in any other photos taken by Clauson and Avarella. The duo was left baffled, unable to determine if what they saw was something supernatural or simply a case of pareidolia. Pareidolia is a psychological phenomenon where people see familiar shapes, like faces or human figures, in random objects or patterns. In this case, it refers to the possibility that the strange figure in the photograph is just an illusion created by shadows, rocks, or other natural features. To resolve the mystery, the pair turned to the internet for opinions, but online users were equally divided. Some speculated that the figure might be nothing more than the tangled roots of a creeping plant, while others believed it could be something more sinister, like a wendigo—a mythical creature from Native American folklore. Other suggested that the climbers return to the location to investigate, but both Clauson and Avarella hesitated. Despite their curiosity, they admitted they weren’t keen on undertaking another grueling 15-day trek into the mountains. Avarella recounted how the figure was first noticed: “We were watching the mountain photos on our TV, and suddenly my dad asked, ‘What’s that hanging there?’ And we all just stared, saying, ‘What the hell is that?’ It could be a piece of rock, but the anatomy is so human-like—it’s freaky.” Clauson added with a laugh, “I like to think it was an alien.” The post Supernatural or Pareidolia: 20-Foot “Alien” Spotted in Rocky Mountains appeared first on Anomalien.com.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y ·Youtube Music

YouTube
Legends of Classic Rock?Aerosmith, ACDC, Nirvana, Queen?70s, 80s 90s Full Album Collection #rock
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y ·Youtube Music

YouTube
Retribution,Addict - NEFFEX
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Column: 'Fact Checking' Is Often Spin Spoiling, Especially on Abortion
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Column: 'Fact Checking' Is Often Spin Spoiling, Especially on Abortion

The debate debacle hosted by ABC underscored why the conservative half of America is hostile to “fact checkers.” Object to them, and the Left decrees it’s because you’re hostile to facts. But what conservatives actually oppose is leftist argumentation that’s poorly disguised as nonpartisan and devoid of opinion. “Fact checking” is often an exercise in spin-spoiling. The most obvious example from the ABC debate was the Democrat position on abortion. It is, as plainly stated in the 2020 DNC platform, for the woman’s “right to choose” without exception. That is what congressional Democrats have pushed in legislation, to repeal every limitation states have imposed. Donald Trump routinely turns to the 2019 comments of then-Governor Ralph Northam of Virginia on the radio as he discussed a bill by state legislator Kathy Tran to make third-trimester abortions easier. She admitted it was so extreme it would allow a baby to be killed as they were about to be born.   So Northam explained how a baby that was born could be “kept comfortable” while the parents decided if they wanted abortion. After this clip went viral, Northam’s team said he didn’t mean abortion. That’s not credible, but the spin spoilers will quote it like it’s rock-solid. In response to Trump, ABC moderator Linsey Davis made a face like she was smelling rancid meat and said “There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born.” Kamala Harris happily piled on: “Well, as I said, you're going to hear a bunch of lies. And that's not actually a surprising fact.” That fact check is false. Just look at Minnesota under her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz. A state law that was on the books since 1976 required “responsible medical personnel” to use all “reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice” to “preserve the life and health of the born-alive infant.”  The legislation Walz signed in May 2023 disposed of the word “preserve” and replaced it with a revised requirement “to care for the infant who is born alive.” Conservatives can detect the spirit of Northam in that verbiage. Leftists already use the term “abortion care.” That could apply to this. At the very least, the knee-jerk reflex to “fact check” should be suppressed. “Fact checkers” all over the media descended on Trump over his latest citation of Northam, as they have for years now. They spew in outraged protest that late-term abortions are “rare,” like that somehow makes the extreme Democrat stance untrue. ABC had carefully prepared to pounce on this. After the debate, Linsey Davis admitted to Stephen Battaglio at the Los Angeles Times that the decision to attempt to correct the candidates was in response to the CNN debate between Trump and Joe Biden, “whose poor performance led to his exit from the race.“ They claimed to have researched the speeches of both candidates, and Davis said she fully anticipated that Trump's “erroneous” abortion claim would come up when she questioned him. "That was an obvious thing to get on the record," Davis said. But there was no attempt, after all this apparent research on both candidates, to question anything Harris said to “get on the record.” Not one thing. Let’s guess that shameless zero occurred because on the Left, any attempt to fact-check a Democrat opposing Trump is objectionable, because it suggests that a Democrat’s falsehoods might be made equivalent to Trump’s. Every anti-Trump journalist acts on the belief that any measure of neutrality is an atrocity. But they don’t think late-term abortion is an atrocity.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

PBS News Relished Debate’s Dubious Fact Checks on ‘Defensive’ Trump

The PBS News Hour relished the presidential debate between Vice-President Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump, who they believe was fact-checked into oblivion and who succumbed to Harris’s baiting tactics. Co-anchor Geoff Bennett loved that “the former president was repeatedly fact-checked for inaccuracies” by ABC News’s hopelessly hostile moderators, before throwing the story to PBS's Harris campaign reporter/cheerleader Laura Barron-Lopez. After relaying the Trump-Harris debate’s back and forth over the economy and Harris’s closeness to Biden, PBS ran clips of Harris having successfully “baited Trump” over what the reporter called Trump’s “fondness of dictators” and crowd size at his rallies.  Barron-Lopez: For much of the night, Trump was on defense, not answering whether he'd sign or veto a national abortion ban. That's not true. Harris claimed Trump would sign a national ban, and Trump said: "Well, there she goes again. It's a lie. I'm not signing a ban. And there's no reason to sign a ban." She portrayed Trump as on defense two more times in similar fashion, with the help of ABC moderators Linsey and Muir, regarding Ukraine and January 6. Meanwhile, Harris was merely expanding her appeal to “undecided voters.” When PBS did eventually address the obvious bias of ABC’s moderator duo of David Muir and Linsey Davis, it was to make Republicans’ justified complaints look desperate. Barron-Lopez: Trump and Republicans were quick to attack the moderators for fact-checking him in real time, including on abortion. Trump: Her vice-presidential pick says abortion in the ninth month is absolutely fine. He also says execution after birth. It's execution, no longer abortion, because the baby is born. Moderator Linsey Davis: There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born. Gov. Tim Walz's state of Minnesota is extreme, allowing abortions at any stage of pregnancy. Barron-Lopez: And on a debunked conspiracy theory about Haitian immigrants in an Ohio town eating pets, one that's been peddled by far-right activist and 9/11 truther Laura Loomer, who traveled with Trump to the debate. No one likes a 9/11 Truther, and neither should Trump. Loomer is being called one based on an old Twitter post in which she forwarded another user's gross video about 9-11 being an “inside job.” But a Nexis search suggests PBS never mentioned Democratic Rep. Jamaal Bowman touting his very own 9-11 conspiracies (and a truly ghastly poem meditating upon them) on his personal blog, which he maintained up to 2014. If being a Truther is bad for a Republican gadfly, surely it’s bad for an actual elected Democrat. Barron-Lopez: Katie Sanders of PolitiFact defended the moderators. (PBS News Hour has partnered with Sanders and her left-leaning PolitiFact for the 2024 campaign, with predictable results.) Katie Sanders, Editor in Chief, PolitiFact: When a candidate is lobbying conspiracy theories, that's kind of a softball for a moderator, and it's particularly glaring if you don't address that. Barron-Lopez: She said Harris was not immune from critique for leaving out finer details, but it was Trump who required more immediate fact-checking. Sanders: I think one candidate, former President Trump, was repeating conspiracy theories that are pretty well-known to be false at this point and so it's almost easier to call those out in real time. Anchor Geoff Bennett seemed pleased with how the campaign was going for Harris, post-debate. Bennett: So, Laura, the Harris campaign feels good about how last night went both in terms of Harris' performance and the degree to which Donald Trump lost his composure multiple times last night. How does the debate in their view help her position in this campaign moving forward? Barron-Lopez: Well, the campaign feels as though it helps her immensely, that essentially the momentum she has had since she jumped into the race, they feel as though it's only going to be furthered by the debate. And that's what a lot of Democrats that I spoke to said. They feel as though it's totally different than how they felt after that June debate between President Biden and Donald Trump….. In another segment Wednesday about accusations that recent Haitian immigrants are eating pets in Springfield, Ohio, PBS reporter William Brangham tracked down show favorite and hard-left academic extremist-hunter Cynthia Miller-Idriss, who understood the assignment: Cynthia Miller-Idriss, American University: There's always been this idea of a threat from the other, from immigrants, from people of color to the nation, to white families, to civilization itself, right? This idea that there's some terrible threat coming that has to be defended against, and then, as evidence of that….It demonizes and it dehumanizes. Miller-Idriss once linked going to the gym with far-right extremism, which sounds extreme in itself. This segment was brought to you in part by Consumer Cellular. A transcript is available, click "Expand." PBS News Hour 9/11/24 7:03:03 p.m. (ET) Amna Nawaz: Tens of millions of Americans tuned into last night's consequential presidential debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. Geoff Bennett: The contentious debate may be the only face off of the campaign season. Vice President Harris tried to walk a fine line between being both an incumbent and a change candidate all while fending off attacks from Donald Trump. And the former president was repeatedly fact-checked for inaccuracies. Laura Barron-Lopez reports. Kamala Harris, Vice President of the United States (D) and U.S. Presidential Candidate: Kamala Harris. Donald Trump, Former President of the United States (R) and Current U.S. Presidential Candidate: Nice to see you. Have fun. Laura Barron-Lopez: The night began cordially before the gloves came off. Kamala Harris: World leaders are laughing at Donald Trump. I have talked with military leaders, some of whom worked with you, and they say you're a disgrace. Donald Trump: She got zero votes, and when she ran, she was the first one to leave because she failed. Laura Barron-Lopez: It was their first face-to-face meeting, and their first head-to-head clash on the issues, like on the economy. Kamala Harris: I have a plan, $6,000 for young families for the first year of your child's life to help you in that most critical stage of your child's development. I have a plan. Donald Trump: She copied Biden's plan, and it's like four sentences, like run, Spot, run. Four sentences that are just, oh, we will try and lower taxes. Laura Barron-Lopez: The former president tried to link Harris to President Biden. Donald Trump: She is Biden. She's trying to get away from Biden. I don't know the gentleman she says. She is Biden. Kamala Harris: Clearly, I am not Joe Biden, and I am certainly not Donald Trump. Laura Barron-Lopez: And Harris, a former prosecutor, repeatedly baited Trump. Kamala Harris: They're so clear they can manipulate you with flattery and favors. Laura Barron-Lopez: From highlighting his fondness of dictators to needling Trump about the crowd size at his rallies. Kamala Harris: I'm going to invite you to attend one of Donald Trump's rallies, because it's a really interesting thing to watch. You will see during the course of his rallies, he talks about fictional characters like Hannibal Lecter. He will talk about windmills cause cancer. And what you will also notice is that people start leaving his rallies early out of exhaustion and boredom. Donald Trump: People don't leave my rallies. We have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics. That's because people want to take their country back. Laura Barron-Lopez: For much of the night, Trump was on defense, not answering whether he'd sign or veto a national abortion ban. Linsey Davis, ABC News Live "Prime" Anchor: If I could just get a yes or no, because you're running mate, J.D. Vance, has said that you would veto if you did come to your desk. Donald Trump: Well, I didn't discuss it with J.D., in all fairness. Look, we don't have to discuss it. Laura Barron-Lopez: Refusing to say if he thought defending Ukraine against Russia was in America's national security interests. David Muir, "World News Tonight" Anchor and Managing Editor: I want to ask you a very simple question tonight. Do you want Ukraine to win this war? Donald Trump ® Former President of the United States and Presidential Nominee: I want the war to stop. I want to save lives that are being uselessly — people being killed by the millions. It's the millions. David Muir: Just to clarify in the question, do you believe it's in the U.S. best interests for Ukraine to win this war, yes or no? Donald Trump: I think it's the U.S. best interests to get this war finished and just get it done. Laura Barron-Lopez: And taking no responsibility for his role in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. David Muir: Is there anything you regret about what you did on that day, yes or no? Donald Trump: I had nothing to do with that, other than they asked me to make a speech. Laura Barron-Lopez: Vice President Harris used that moment to appeal to undecided voters. Kamala Harris: It's time to turn the page. And if that was a bridge too far for you, well, there is a place in our campaign for you to stand for country, to stand for our democracy, to stand for rule of law, and to end the chaos. Laura Barron-Lopez: Moments after the debate ended, Harris picked up a superstar endorsement, Taylor Swift. And in a rare move for a presidential candidate, Trump went to the spin room afterward. Over the last 24 hours, in multiple FOX News interviews, Trump questioned whether he'd do another debate, and said ABC should lose its license. Donald Trump: It was three to one. It was a rigged deal, as I assumed it would be. I think ABC took a big hit last night. I mean, to be honest, they're a news organization. They have to be licensed to do it. They ought to take away their license for the way they did that. Laura Barron-Lopez: Trump and Republicans were quick to attack the moderators for fact-checking him in real time, including on abortion. Donald Trump: Her vice presidential pick says abortion in the ninth month is absolutely fine. He also says execution after birth. It's execution, no longer abortion, because the baby is born. Linsey Davis: There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born. Laura Barron-Lopez: And on a debunked conspiracy theory about Haitian immigrants in an Ohio town eating pets, one that's been peddled by far right activist and 9/11 truther Laura Loomer, who traveled with Trump to the debate. Donald Trump: In Springfield, they're eating the dogs, the people that came in. They're eating the cats. They're eating — they're eating the pets of the people that live there. David Muir: ABC News did reach out to the city manager there. He told us there had been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community. Donald Trump: Well, I have seen people on television. David Muir: Let me just say… Laura Barron-Lopez: Katie Sanders of PolitiFact defended the moderators. Katie Sanders, Editor in Chief, PolitiFact: When a candidate is lobbying conspiracy theories, that's kind of a softball for a moderator, and it's particularly glaring if you don't address that. Laura Barron-Lopez: She said Harris was not immune from critique for leaving out finer details, but it was Trump who required more immediate fact-checking. Katie Sanders: I think one candidate, former President Trump, was repeating conspiracy theories that are pretty well-known to be false at this point and so it's almost easier to call those out in real time.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

Blaze News investigates: Staff from migrant shelter accused of funneling taxpayer funds to family's business
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Blaze News investigates: Staff from migrant shelter accused of funneling taxpayer funds to family's business

Nongovernmental organizations have been tasked with providing shelter accommodations and a variety of humanitarian services to those flooding into the country in unprecedented numbers under the Biden-Harris administration's illegal immigration crisis.The federal government's massive investments in NGOs have ignited concerns that the organizations are operating less like nonprofits and more like government contractors. However, these organizations are not beholden to the same transparency requirements as contractors, leaving them potentially more vulnerable to waste, fraud, and abuse. So far in fiscal year 2024, Pima County, Arizona, has reportedly received nearly $21.3 million of taxpayer funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Shelter and Services Program. The vast majority of that money was directed to Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona's Casa Alitas, a program offering "shelter, necessities and travel assistance to asylum seeking families," according to its website. 'Are we going to find out more inappropriate activities with taxpayer money?'While Casa Alitas started from humble beginnings in 2014 with an all-volunteer staff, it has since rapidly expanded as the immigration crisis has exploded. As recently as 2019, the program only provided services to 30 individuals a day. Those estimates have since climbed to as many as 1,800 daily. In recent weeks, the Tucson-based program has been rocked by a massive corruption and conflict-of-interest scandal, with allegations that two of its former employees funneled taxpayer funds to a family-run business, intentionally overcharging to rake in additional profits. As a result, the workers have since been removed from their positions, but now the program is facing calls for a federal investigation into the alleged misused funds. Casa Alitas faces corruption accusations According to publicly available tax records, Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona, a service network in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Tucson, spent $14.5 million in federal funds in 2023. That same year, it nearly doubled its revenue, $42.2 million, compared to 2022, $24.3 million. Within the last several months, the group's Casa Alitas program has come under fire after a couple of its employees were accused of misusing taxpayer funds. The New Republic first reported that Pima County Administrator Jan Lesher released a May 17 memo stating that one of CCS' vendors was providing services to Casa Alitas "without a contract," which she noted was "in violation of County and federal procurement rules for the Federal Emergency Management Agency Shelter Services Program grant." Lesher wrote that CCS had "taken disciplinary action against the employees involved in hiring the vendor and alerted the County about the lack of required procurement procedures and contracting." She added that CCS was "taking the appropriate corrective actions" in response to the violations. However, the details and circumstances leading up to the realization of the violations were unclear at the time. Lesher's memo quoted CCS Chief Executive Officer Elena Dwyre as stating that, following an internal review, the organization discovered that Casa Alitas had been "overcharged for services by a contractor." "Upon further investigation we learned that two employees with that program [Casa Alitas] had violated our conflict of interest and purchasing policies," Dwyre was quoted as saying. "Those employee relationships were quickly terminated, the contractor relationship was likewise discontinued, and program partners were promptly notified of the issue." The organization did not divulge the names of the employees. However, last month, an anonymous source shared internal documents with the New Republic that revealed who was allegedly involved in the illegal vendor contract. According to the documents obtained by the news outlet, that questionable contract was with Amado Laundry Service, located in Amado, nearly 40 miles away from Casa Alitas in Tucson. The company reportedly sent 37 laundry invoices to the organization totaling $411,967. The Arizona Daily Star reported that the laundry vendor was providing services without a contract and was selected without a competitive bid process. The New Republic noted that the laundry company charged excessively high prices compared to other operators in the Tucson area. The news outlet found that other vendors charge anywhere from $1.15 to $2.80 per pound of laundry, while Amado Laundry Service charged the nonprofit between $3.10 and $4.50 per pound — a nearly 300% markup. Additionally, photocopies of checks obtained by the New Republic revealed that the organization may have overpaid the vendor, sending it $438,940.55. Furthermore, Arizona Corporation Commission records showed that the laundry company was not formed until several weeks after it started submitting invoices. However, the real bombshell was revealed when the news outlet uncovered who the laundry business was registered to — the mother of Diego Piña Lopez, the organization's then-executive director. While the nonprofit never released the names of the two employees who were removed from their positions, after the scandal was uncovered, Piña Lopez and his immediate supervisor, Teresa Cavendish, were no longer employed by CCS. Despite the shady business dealings, Dwyre confirmed that the vendor did, in fact, provide laundry services to Casa Alitas. While Piña Lopez was allegedly allowing his mother's business to soak up taxpayer dollars, Casa Alitas, the largest shelter in Arizona, was heading into a potential funding crisis. Federal funding was set to run out at the end of April, and local leaders, including Piña Lopez, were voicing concerns that illegal immigrants could be released onto the streets unless the organization received additional financial resources from the federal government. At the time, he told the Arizona Republic, "I think that's going to lead to a lot of chaos, and a lot more cost across the board for folks to get services, as many of the people coming through leave fairly quickly here." Casa Alitas warned 30 workers — half its staff — that they may no longer receive pay after March 31. The organization even geared up to shut down the largest county-owned building it used to provide services to illegal aliens due to the potential dried-up funds. Piña Lopez claimed that the nonprofit would be forced to prioritize providing shelter to families with children, warning that the county's street releases would reach up to 400 individuals daily. "We've avoided the street releases for so long because we've all worked together and we've developed a really nuanced system, and I think we just need to keep working towards that," Piña Lopez told the Arizona Republic. "And if we're going to have this problem where the funding is going to be held up for a little while, then we need to figure out as a team how we're going to work through as Tucson, and to build out our resources to look different, but not to be different." He noted that the organization would have to rely on community donations and volunteers to keep its operations going if the funding were to end. Lesher noted that "everybody was out looking very hard to see how we can squeeze the nickels and roll the programs as far as they could be rolled," unaware at the time that the laundry vendor was absorbing some of those needed funds. Ultimately, the funding did not run out, with Congress passing a $1.2 trillion spending package in March. Piña Lopez declined requests for comment from the New Republic or the Arizona Daily Star. Cavendish did not respond to requests for comment from either news outlet.What now? The scandal involving Casa Alitas prompted concerns about how taxpayer funds are being spent by organizations and NGOs tasked with providing services to illegal aliens. County Supervisor Steve Christy told the Arizona Daily Star that his "first response" to the uncovered unethical activity was that "maybe it's symptomatic of a bigger problem." "Are we going to find out more inappropriate activities with taxpayer money? It's certainly very troubling to me," Christy stated. On August 20, Congressman Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.) penned a letter to the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Joseph Cuffari asking the agency to take a closer look into CCS and the potential misuse of taxpayer funds. Ciscomani requested a "comprehensive investigation into the use of federal funds," noting that Pima County has already received more than $20 million in fiscal year 2024 through FEMA's SSP. 'We were shocked to discover two Casa Alitas employees had violated our conflict of interest and purchasing policies.'"It is my understanding that while Pima County is the fiscal agent, these funds go primarily to Casa Alitas migrant operations. Moreover, it is my understanding that when compared to other SSP grant recipients, the burn rate of funds used by Casa Alitas has been incredibly high," Ciscomani told Cuffari.The congressman requested the Office of Inspector General to conduct a review of "all federal dollars" provided to the county through SSP since 2020. "Specifically, the dollar amount provided to Catholic Community Services' Casa Alitas," he noted. The congressman also requested reviews of "all procurement processes documented by" Casa Alitas and a "comparison of the cost per migrant, per day, of all funds awarded under SSP." A spokesperson for Ciscomani told Blaze News that the DHS OIG acknowledged receiving the letter but has not yet responded. "Amid allegations of corruption and the misuse of taxpayer dollars, I am calling for a thorough and comprehensive investigation into the operations and use of funds by Casa Alitas," Ciscomani said in a statement sent to Blaze News. "It is critical that we ensure transparency and accountability in the use of federal funds meant to address the ongoing migrant crisis. Congress, and the American people, deserve transparency and anyone who has taken advantage of these programs must be held accountable." The DHS OIG did not respond to requests for comment. Lorraine Rivera, the director of communications for the Diocese of Tucson, told Blaze News, "We are aware of the matter regarding Casa Alitas, and we are grateful for Catholic Community Services' professional and transparent approach in addressing this issue and promptly self-reporting it to Pima County, as well as the Diocese. CCS has assured us of its commitment to operate with integrity, cooperate with County officials, and continued dedication to our Catholic mission." In a statement to Blaze News, Dwyre said: As an organization rooted in faith, we at Catholic Community Services take seriously our duty to operate with integrity and to be good stewards of the resources entrusted to us. Earlier this summer, we learned our migrant shelter program, Casa Alitas, had been overcharged for laundry services by a contractor. Following an investigation into this discrepancy, we learned this contractor had not been procured in line with County guidelines, and we were shocked to discover two Casa Alitas employees had violated our conflict of interest and purchasing policies, which are in place to ensure fiscal responsibility.Importantly, Casa Alitas promptly self-reported this incident to its program partners, including Pima County and the Diocese of Tucson. This was a clear violation of not only our best practices, but also of our values, faith and trust, and we are deeply disappointed by these actions. Those employees were quickly removed, and the contractor relationship was likewise discontinued.Since that time, we have worked closely and cooperatively with Pima County leadership to thoroughly review all our contracts to confirm they are aligned with necessary federal rules and guidelines. Additionally, we have taken steps to rectify these billing issues with the County, improve training practices for employees and strengthen oversight of our purchasing processes.While we are confident this matter will not impede our operations or our mission, we will continuously seek ways to strengthen our best practices.NGOs profit off administration's crisis The Biden-Harris administration has used its self-inflicted border crisis to pump billions of dollars into organizations that provide services to illegal aliens who are awaiting years-out court dates to review their not-yet-verified asylum claims. In addition to the chaos at the southwest border, the federal government has also expanded so-called "lawful pathways" to expedite the entry of foreign nationals in other ways, including by providing direct flights into the United States. These efforts have led to an urgent need to provide shelter and humanitarian services to the illegal alien arrivals. In late August, the administration announced it would distribute another $380 million to 50 nonprofit organizations and local municipalities providing such services, including funding to SSP. According to the federal government, the funds help to ensure that Customs and Border Protection's holding facilities do not become overcrowded. So far this year, the administration has already earmarked $640 million in SSP grants. The latest round of funding will give Maricopa County and Pima County $38 million to split between them. Jessica Vaughan, the director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, recently sounded the alarm about the potential of misused taxpayer funds, telling Blaze News, "These organizations, they call themselves advocacy groups or charitable organizations, or even NGOs, but what they really are is government contractors who are being paid by the government, seeking work with the federal government to perform these services to illegal migrants. In effect, resettling illegal migration, assisting illegal migrants." She noted that some of the organizations have even crossed the line "into actually sheltering and harboring, and thereby encouraging illegal immigration." "They operate funded primarily with taxpayer dollars, and yet they consider themselves to be largely immune from transparency or any examination of their activities," Vaughan explained. In an effort to stop these potentially unlawful activities, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed what Vaughan called a "very important and groundbreaking" lawsuit against an NGO that he claims is facilitating unlawful crossing and shielding illegal aliens from federal immigration officials, Blaze News previously reported. Paxton's complaint claims that El Paso-based Annunciation House, a Catholic nonprofit, "by its own admissions" has facilitated illegal immigration. His office has stated that "Annunciation House is in a category of its own among these NGOs" because it is "openly operating in violation of the law without any pretense of trying to comply with the law." The lawsuit aims to shut down the nonprofit's operations in Texas. Annunciation House has denied these claims, stating that Paxton holds an "illegal, immoral and anti-faith position."
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

On This Day in 1899, a Car Fatally Struck a Pedestrian for the First Time in American History
Favicon 
www.smithsonianmag.com

On This Day in 1899, a Car Fatally Struck a Pedestrian for the First Time in American History

Henry Hale Bliss' death presaged the battle between the 20th-century automobile lobby and walkers in U.S. cities
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Rescuing Patriotism in a Nation on the Brink
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Rescuing Patriotism in a Nation on the Brink

Conservatives will not win every election, but we can still work to better this country by encouraging civic-mindedness and unity among our fellow citizens.
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
1 y

Media Hawks and Media Naifs’ Dishonesty and Bias
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

Media Hawks and Media Naifs’ Dishonesty and Bias

The obvious prejudice shown by debate moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis should surprise no one.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 58460 out of 100416
  • 58456
  • 58457
  • 58458
  • 58459
  • 58460
  • 58461
  • 58462
  • 58463
  • 58464
  • 58465
  • 58466
  • 58467
  • 58468
  • 58469
  • 58470
  • 58471
  • 58472
  • 58473
  • 58474
  • 58475
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund