This old-school dessert is a classic for a reason. READ MORE...

There’s a reason people love it! READ MORE...

Dr. Francis Collins, former director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was confronted over the experimental COVID-19 shot. “Dr. Francis Collins, former head of the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Anthony Fauci’s boss, gets called out over COVID-19 vaccine injuries during a night out with his wife,” The Canadian Independent wrote. “Dr. Collins, you and Ralph Baric, and Tony Fauci, deserve to be in prison for the rest of your lives,” an individual behind the camera told Collins. “You have so much blood on your hands. I hope you sleep well at night,” the individual continued. “And remember the name Brianne Dressen, because you left her stranded after she was severely injured by the COVID vaccine in your study,” the individual added. WATCH: WATCH: Dr. Francis Collins, former head of the National Institutes of Health and Dr. Anthony Fauci’s boss, gets called out over COVID-19 vaccine injuries during a night out with his wife. pic.twitter.com/mibtkarxzM — The Canadian Independent (@canindependent) August 18, 2024 X users reacted to the exchange: This is the way. https://t.co/EbwHBY6mOZ — Emerald Robinson (@EmeraldRobinson) August 18, 2024 The COVID criminals have nowhere to hide. https://t.co/JP6hpg8Jsl — Craig Kelly (@CraigKellyPHON) August 18, 2024 Everybody who pushes "vaccines" needs to be challenged. https://t.co/87ZRVCLpsA — Robin Monotti (@robinmonotti) August 18, 2024 He should be eating prison food. https://t.co/LmAP7eehQH — Catturd (@catturd2) August 18, 2024 This is exactly what needs to be done to every one of these evil people. https://t.co/9q4g4MVuMV — The Disrespected Trucker (@DisrespectedThe) August 18, 2024 According to her X profile, Brianne Dressen is a “Mom of two. Injured AstraZeneca clinical trial participant, now disabled. Vaccine injury advocate. Co-Founder @react19org.” Dressen sued AstraZeneca earlier this year. 42-Year-Old American Woman Sues AstraZeneca, Says COVID-19 Shot Left Her ‘Permanently Disabled’ During Clinical Trial "Well... I am officially suing the drug manufacturer. How? Due to breach of contract. AstraZeneca's contract with me states they will cover any costs from a research related injury. I was offered a settlement of $1200, final payment," Dressen said. Well... I am officially suing the drug manufacturer. How? Due to breach of contract. AstraZeneca's contract with me states they will cover any costs from a research related injury. I was offered a settlement of $1200, final payment. 1/ pic.twitter.com/PnHzeWUp7x — Brianne Dressen (@BrianneDressen) May 13, 2024 "This is another first for the US as PREP act protections are impenetrable. Being the first and only effort I have done solo, I want our community to know that am 100% committed to continue to advocate to ensure that consumer protections are rightfully restored," Dressen continued. "I am hopeful that this provides accountability for my individual case but also bolsters a pathway forward for my injured colleagues both in the US and abroad. Namely each and every plaintiff in the UK seeking restitution from @astrazeneca also," she added. I am hopeful that this provides accountability for my individual case but also bolsters a pathway forward for my injured colleagues both in the US and abroad. Namely each and every plaintiff in the UK seeking restitution from @astrazeneca also.@ukcvfamily @VIBUK1 @ake2306 — Brianne Dressen (@BrianneDressen) May 13, 2024 From 100 Percent Fed Up: A 42-year-old woman from Utah is suing AstraZeneca, claiming she was left “permanently disabled” after she participated in the drug manufacturer’s U.S. COVID-19 jab trial in 2020. Brianne Dressen, who developed a severe neurological condition after volunteering for the trial, said AstraZeneca did not provide enough funds to cover her medical expenses. She developed adverse effects hours after taking the shot and was hospitalized. “I walked into the clinic fine, and walked out the beginning of a nightmare I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy,” Dressen said, according to the New York Post. Utah mom sues AstraZeneca, claiming she was left ‘permanently disabled’ in COVID vaccine trial https://t.co/tRL7KXcBKx pic.twitter.com/ECOWeqdKca — New York Post (@nypost) May 14, 2024 According to Daily Mail, 32,000 people participated in the 2020 study. "Ms Dressen was diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy — a condition that causes numbness and pain due to damaged nerves," the outlet noted. "Doctors later classified her condition as a 'post-vaccine neuropathy' because of its links to the jab," it added. Per Daily Mail: In her legal complaint, filed in the US District Court in Utah, she says she has become 'a shadow of her former self'. '[I am]unable to work, unable to do any athletic activity, unable to parent the way she had, and unable to drive more than a few blocks at a time,' the filing adds. She also said her athletic life has collapsed, with Ms Dressen now unable to rock climb, hike, snowboard or wakeboard like she used to. Before receiving the vaccine in the trial, Ms Dressen claims she signed an agreement with the company that promised it would 'pay the costs of medical treatment for research injuries, provided that the costs are reasonable, and you did not cause the injury yourself'. But she says that ever since the severe sensations emerged across her body after receiving the jab, AstraZeneca has refused to cover her care. AstraZeneca has so far offered her a small sum in a deal that would have limited the company's liability in a lawsuit. Utah law allows those who sue for breach of contract to claim for costs resulting from the breach and for damages — which could result in a significant payout for Ms Dressen. The US trial of the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine involved 32,000 people and found that the jab was 79 percent effective at preventing a symptomatic Covid infection.

In peak irony, security officials have constructed a “15-foot buffer” around the site of the Democratic National Convention. Massive protests are expected around the DNC in Chicago, with approximately 100,000 anticipated protestors. House Democrats Reportedly Fear For Their Safety at Democratic National Convention, Approximately 100K Protestors Anticipated "The security footprint area encompasses a 15-foot buffer around the perimeter of McCormick Place and the United Center, and includes Union Park and Park 578, where large-scale protests are planned," ABC 7 Chicago reports. Officials brought in "metal fencing" and "barricades" to place around the perimeter. WATCH: IRONIC! Democrat officials are now building a wall around the venue for the DNC They are scared of the imminent protests, riots, and lootings. I guess walls really do work Police are also preparing to make mass arrests every night of the convention Nothing like this happened… pic.twitter.com/pHf3aZvRQQ — George (@BehizyTweets) August 17, 2024 ABC 7 Chicago reports: Within this area you cannot "push, pull or transport any vehicle, cart or float" or throw any item. You are also not allow to possess any item deemed a potential safety hazard, including large bags and suitcases as well as laptops, sealed packages, drones, animals other than service/guide dogs, bicycles, scooters, folding chairs, balloons, coolers, glass, thermal or metal containers, umbrellas with metal tips, tobacco products including e-cigarettes, lighters, matches, firearms, ammunition, fireworks, tents and structures, and pointed objects of any kind, including knives. In issuing those rules prohibiting those items from the demonstration zones, CPD says they're in accordance with city ordinance. Violators could face jail time. The security restrictions and footprint will remain in place until 12:01 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 26. Crews also worked to set up vehicle screening checkpoints around the McCormick Place, which will start screening cars in the area around the convention center as early as Friday night into Saturday morning. "Hopefully the checkpoints go smoother than I thought, because I'll be driving to work this week, but I'm glad they're taking it seriously," said Melinda Fried, South Loop resident. "Personally I think it's a little overkill, but I'd rather have overkill than not enough, so it works for me," said William Burns, South Loop resident. The area around the United Center has become more fortified with eight-foot-tall fences and concrete barriers. "In accordance with City of Chicago ordinance O2024-8373, a security footprint is being established for the upcoming 2024 Democratic National Convention to facilitate safety and order during the convention," Chicago Police Communications & News Affairs wrote. "The security footprint will be operational for the convention period which commences at 12:01 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Saturday, August 17, 2024 and extends until 12:01 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Monday, August 26, 2024," it added. The security footprint will be operational for the convention period which commences at 12:01 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Saturday, August 17, 2024 and extends until 12:01 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Monday, August 26, 2024 — Chicago Police Communications & News Affairs (@CPD_Media) August 17, 2024 WATCH:

Chinese authorities have started monitoring both people and goods entering the country for monkeypox, or what it is now known as mpox. China’s General Administration of Customs (GAC) said that the new measures will remain [...] The post China To Start Screening Arrivals For Monkeypox appeared first on The People's Voice.

In a candid “Sunday Special” interview with Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro, actor Dennis Quaid revealed what led him to accept the titular role in his newest movie “Reagan,” and discussed how Hollywood has “lost its relevancy with an audience.”  “Reagan” hits theaters on August 30 and also stars Jon Voight as a fictional ex-KGB agent and Penelope Ann Miller as Nancy Reagan. Quaid told Shapiro that he was initially hesitant to take on the role of President Ronald Reagan, citing the former president’s iconic status and the challenge of portraying him authentically.  “Reagan was my favorite president,” Quaid said. “I voted for Jimmy Carter in ’76. It was the first time I could vote, but then I voted for Reagan in ’80.” WATCH THE FULL ‘SUNDAY SPECIAL’ INTERVIEW WITH DENNIS QUAID The actor revealed that visiting Reagan’s ranch was a turning point in his decision to accept the role, and emphasized the importance of capturing Reagan’s essence beyond mere impersonation.  “Acting is about what makes people tick, you know, and you have the public persona, but you have to be able to get behind that as an actor in order to make someone come alive and not just make an impression,” he stated. Regarding his approach to acting, Quaid emphasized the importance of research and character development. For his portrayal of Reagan, he said he had “a couple of years really before we even started filming” to prepare, allowing him to capture the nuances of Reagan’s speech and mannerisms across different periods of his life. “One of the things that’s fascinating when you read biographies of Reagan is that pretty much everybody who knew him, maybe except for Nancy, talks about him having this sort of inner reserve, how he would you know, he would be in the room with you and obviously he would interact with you, but there was a part of him that he sort of kept behind a wall,” Shapiro said. “What do you think that was?” Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you. “That’s the thing between the impersonation and getting to the person about what makes them tick,” Quaid replied, adding, “And there was that thing of Reagan I heard from everyone that knew him, there’s this impenetrable space that he always had that, you know, this is the ‘Great Communicator,’ quite jovial of a person, but there was this place that you couldn’t get past as well, a very private place. And I think that was always there with him from childhood, really.”  The film’s independent financing allowed for greater creative control over the story, Quaid said, adding that this approach enabled the filmmakers to present a more nuanced and potentially positive portrayal of Reagan than might have been possible through traditional Hollywood channels. Reflecting on the current state of Hollywood, Quaid observed, “I think that Hollywood has sort of lost its relevancy with an audience to a certain extent.” Quaid told Shapiro that he sees potential in emerging film production centers outside of Los Angeles, such as Atlanta and Texas, as new hubs for creativity and talent. Quaid expressed hope that the Reagan biopic would not only entertain but also educate younger audiences about an important period in American history. “For those who are like your age, you know, you get a glimpse into what this country used to be like. And for those like my age, you’re reminded what this country was and what it still can be,” he said. The actor concluded by sharing his desire to see more diverse stories told in Hollywood, mentioning a potential project about Crazy Horse and the Lakota Sioux as an example of an untold narrative he’d like to bring to the screen.