A provocative commentary by Cortney Weil appearing at Blaze Media last week warned against “black-pilling.” Weil associated this activity with a misguided right whose members are underestimating Donald Trump’s chances of being re-elected. This unhelpful gloom, we are told, might foster despair among those who otherwise would be working energetically for a Republican victory in November.Although Weil warns against pessimism, she doesn’t quite prove that it’s misplaced. She is just upset to hear defeatist attitudes coming from the ranks, even if they’re justified. Moreover, Weil indiscriminately throws together two groups that are spreading this gloom, both of which she identifies with the right. As someone who most emphatically favors the right, I can’t figure out how I’m in the same camp as National Review’s Jim Geraghty. Like others at his magazine, Geraghty earns his bread by attacking Trump while fronting for the now displaced Republican establishment.It is naïve to believe we are not living through a government-driven cultural revolution, one that the media, the culture industry, and American schools are pushing nonstop.Also, unlike Isaac Schorr, who is published in the moderately conservative New York Post, I have not condemned Trump for naming JD Vance as his running mate. I’m delighted that the former president made that choice. In fact, I would be happy to vote for Vance for any office.Weil unfortunately failed to make an important distinction. The honest right expresses pessimism, while those who profit from their association with the old Republican establishment ridicule Trump. These two groups do not overlap, and they certainly don't question Trump's chances of re-election for the same reasons.Although a distributor of black pills, I am nonetheless rooting for Trump and Vance. I even placed a highly visible sign for them on my front lawn and sent several contributions to their campaign.I would be amazed if they won, for all the reasons other pessimistic right-wingers have highlighted. I believe Democrats cheat, which is why they introduce less secure forms of voting and try to give the vote to illegal aliens they deliberately bring into this country to boost their party’s numbers. The left also controls most vital institutions in the United States, especially government administration, the mass media, and educational institutions.Considering the insanely radical positions of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, which they held until only recently, this election shouldn’t even be close. I’m struck by the absence of a mass outcry that Harris has deliberately avoided interviews and policy questions. In a normal society, I would also expect to find very widespread revulsion for the elementary school gibberish in which she speaks.But this is not the case. Kamala’s popularity has been growing, or is at least staying the same, no matter how hard she runs away from questions and no matter how frenetically the media shields her.Further, the inflation of abortion rights into a leading electoral issue should cause one to doubt the Fox News bromide that American voters are reasonable. Since the Dobbs decision that supposedly stripped women of their “reproductive rights,” more abortions have been performed in America than before. That Kamala Harris is now pinning her race on abortion as her “key issue” and is achieving success by doing so should lead us to question the rationality of about half the American electorate.The fact that the Democratic candidates are tied and possibly ahead in a race against a former president who presided over an excellent economy, well-protected borders, and safe streets indicates how powerful the ubiquitous left has become. This is not a temporary blip in our political and cultural situation. It reflects long-established trends in our national life which go back at least as far as the 1960s.It is naïve to believe we are not living through a government-driven cultural revolution, one that the media, the culture industry, and American schools are pushing nonstop. This transformation has influenced our politics profoundly, which makes me hesitate to designate Trump and Vance as the likely victors in the presidential election.Even if “our guys” prevail and their party does better than expected in congressional races, the battle against an all-pervasive left remains. That left may even accelerate the warfare launched during Trump’s first term. Why would anyone think the left’s attempt to wear down its opposition would stop simply because the Republicans won some elections?Trump’s victory would likely lead to well-planned riots and the further weaponization of the administrative state. Meanwhile, the media would be openly calling for Trump’s removal from office by any means. And oh yes, our adversaries would have ample financial resources to achieve their ends thanks to America’s woke capitalist class.Although the other side may be obnoxious, let’s not underestimate their will to gain power nor their resourcefulness in going after what they want. If pointing that out means serving black pills, then I’ll gladly plead guilty.

The 29-year-old former girlfriend to FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced to two years in prison on Tuesday for her part in the massive cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme. 'I've seen a lot of cooperators in 30 years here. I've never seen one quite like Ms. Ellison.' Caroline Ellison had been the CEO of Alameda Research, a privately-controlled hedge fund that Bankman-Fried had been improperly funneling money into from the massive FTX cryptocurrency exchange. In Dec. 2022, Ellison pleaded guilty to seven counts related to the scheme, including conspiracy to commit commodities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud. Although she faced up to 110 years in prison for the seven charges, a judge in New York gave her a shortened sentence due to her "very, very substantial" cooperation with the government's case against her former boyfriend and other FTX executives."She cooperated and he denied the whole thing," said Judge Lewis Kaplan. "I've seen a lot of cooperators in 30 years here. I've never seen one quite like Ms. Ellison."Bankman-Fried had previously been ordered by Kaplan to turn over $11 billion in funds to the government in order to compensate the victims of the FTX scandal. He was convicted on seven charges, including wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Kaplan went on to note that Bankman-Fried continued to claim innocence while Ellison had expressed guilt and regret. "You are genuinely remorseful," the judge continued. "He's sorry the gamble he took didn't work out, and he's really sorry he got caught."Ellison apologized for her behavior at a podium before the sentence was announced. "I want to apologize most of all to the victims," said a tearful Ellison. "Not a day goes by when I don't think about all the people I hurt."Bankman-Fried has filed an appeal of the conviction on the basis that it was an unfair trial a year after he was sentenced to 25 years in prison. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Argentina’s firebrand leader, Javier Milei, keeps winning. He promised a libertarian revolution in the long-socialist country, and this month, he’s crushing inflation, advancing an austere new zero-deficit budget, and scheduling a high-level sit-down on the future of cryptocurrencies with the founder of Cardano. But unfortunately, there’s another side to Milei’s policy plans — one straight out of dystopian sci-fi. When Javier Milei secured the presidency of Argentina last November, the global far right erupted in celebration. Milei’s landslide victory over the Peronist candidate, Sergio Massa, by nearly 3 million votes ignited hope among populists worldwide. Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro were among the first to cheer their Argentine ally, with Trump confidently predicting that Milei would “truly make Argentina great again” and Bolsonaro praising the win as a triumph for “honesty, progress, and freedom.” The admiration and praise were understandable — after all, the Argentinian people elected a man of the people, someone who promised to do his utmost to work in their best interests. Authorities could potentially detain individuals based on predicted future crimes, stripping away the very essence of free will and personal liberty. Which makes Milei’s latest initiative so baffling and unsettling. Under his leadership, Argentina recently established a so-called Applied Artificial Intelligence for Security Unit. This new agency, part of the Ministry of Security, is tasked with leveraging AI to analyze vast amounts of historical crime data and monitor social media interactions, all to predict and prevent criminal activities. Such an initiative might seem forward-thinking and innovative. The idea that AI can forecast criminal behavior based on historical patterns sounds efficient, and perhaps in a certain way, it is. But it’s littered with potential land mines: overreach, profiling, and unwarranted surveillance. The emphasis on scanning social media for “potential threats” risks devolving into invasive scrutiny of the everyday lives of ordinary citizens, all under a vaguely defined and potentially overbroad mandate. Lamentably, this isn’t just about Milei or Argentina. AI-driven surveillance is becoming increasingly common in countries worldwide, including in the United States. In China, a country I worked in for 18 months, AI is already employed to monitor citizens’ behavior, with those deemed “untrustworthy” facing consequences ranging from travel bans to restricted access to social services. One could argue that the situation has already shifted, with cities like New York and London now resembling Beijing and Shanghai in terms of surveillance. Of course, this dystopian reality is eerily similar to what we’ve seen depicted in episodes of "Black Mirror" or the movie "Minority Report." Authorities could potentially detain individuals based on predicted future crimes, stripping away the very essence of free will and personal liberty. Social media posts, online searches, and even the most mundane activities could fall under the relentless gaze of automated systems designed to flag anything deemed suspicious. As if that’s not bad enough, these systems can easily be misused, leading to unwarranted interventions, the targeting of political dissenters, or the suppression of dissenting voices. As I write this, all across Europe, including in Ireland, my place of birth, "hate speech" laws are being implemented with increasing severity. Individuals found guilty of crossing the line, even through a social media post, are facing lengthy prison sentences. Now is the time for citizens and lawmakers to engage with these developments critically. Ensuring that the pursuit of security does not come at the cost of the liberties it aims to protect is of vital importance. AI can be a tool for good, but only if everyday people have a say in how it is used. The power to shape our future should not be left solely in the hands of governments or tech giants. We must demand transparency, accountability, and a say in how these technologies are deployed. Otherwise, Big Brother will get a whole lot bigger and, without a doubt, a whole lot badder.

Antony Blinken Urges Republicans to Reconsider Contempt Proceedings

Cornell University PhD Student Very Shocked America Won't Allow Him to Harass Jewish Students Any Longer

Thread Highlights DEADLY Consequences of Kamala Harris' Weak Stance on Immigration and Sanctuary Cities

The Surprising Evolution of Mark Zuckerberg - Dems Aren't Going to Like This

WATCH: Nancy Pelosi Erupts Over Jake Tapper Question About Trump, Tells Whopper on Advising Campaigns

New Charges Filed Against Would-Be Trump Assassin - and There's an Ironic Twist With the Judge Assigned

Whenever I consider the current state of play in the field of artificial intelligence -- particularly regarding the way companies like OpenAI are scrambling to create a kind of digital god, as it were -- it reminds me an awful lot about the earful we all got during the Covid pandemic about the concept of gain-of-function research. That term, of course, refers to the controversial process by which the evolution of potential pathogens and viruses is artificially sped up in a lab. The idea is that scientists shouldn't have to wait around helplessly to see what sorts of nasty surprises nature eventually has in store for us; they can sort of jump to the end, as it were, and in the controlled setting of a lab figure out how to contain this or that threat before it ever materializes. Needless to say, there's a lot about that process that's incredibly stupid and dangerous -- starting with the possibility that academic nitwits with tunnel vision just might, in fact, be unable to control what's inside Pandora's Box after they've cracked it open. I say all that because I remain convinced that a version of the same thing is going on with AI, particularly because of the cultish manner with which OpenAI has always talked about its reason for being: We have to proactively develop artificial superintelligence to our benefit, they insist, lest it just sort of spring forth from the bowels of the web fully formed -- like some kind of immaculately conceived digital intelligence that immediately put us under its heel. Or something. So insists OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, a Silicon Valley veteran who's built a career out of failing upward, who believes there is such a thing as a “median human,” and who has yet to be candid about why OpenAI fired and then rehired him. OpenAI, I should offer as a reminder, is the same company whose CTO a few months ago also mused publicly that some of the jobs that get killed off by AI maybe shouldn't have existed in the first place. Wonderful people, this crew. And it's not just me popping off and saying these sorts of things about Altman & Co. People who've worked closely with Sam likewise portray him as essentially a toxic bullshit artist. Nevertheless, each time he opens his mouth and makes some new proclamation -- as he's just done with a blog post titled The Intelligence Age -- the headlines pile up. The internet goes wild. And very serious people continue to take him very seriously. "It is possible that we will have superintelligence in a few thousand days (!)," Sam writes in his new essay. "It may take longer, but I’m confident we’ll get there." He goes on: "It won’t happen all at once, but we’ll soon be able to work with AI that helps us accomplish much more than we ever could without AI; eventually we can each have a personal AI team, full of virtual experts in different areas, working together to create almost anything we can imagine." Folks, please don't make a fool of yourselves by buying into any of that garbage. As computer scientist Grady Booch wrote in response to Altman's new bluster on X/Twitter: "I am so freaking tired of all the AI hype: it has no basis in reality and serves only to inflate valuations, inflame the public, (garner) headlines, and distract from the real work going on in computing." Likewise on X/Twitter, Bloomberg columnist Matthew Yglesias writes: "Notable that @sama is no longer even paying lip service to existential risk concerns, the only downsides he's contemplating are labor market adjustment issues." We're not talking about some kind of pitched battle here between true believers who think the light of consciousness will eventually be found in computer code versus everyone else. It's really a disagreement between people who think Sam's artificial intelligence woo-woo heralds a positive future for humanity -- and people like me, who see what they're doing as the Silicon Valley version of HR laying off Bob in Accounting ("Look at it this way, Bob, now you've got time to take that vacation you and Shirley have always been talking about"). We'll be so much happier, OpenAI promises! We'll be so much happier when their digital assistants 10x our free time, our happiness, our prosperity. Even though the fact of the matter is that OpenAI and their fellow AI cultists aren't, in fact, trying to save us from the hypothetical future effects of Big Tech; if they get their way, our lives will be wholly and completely dependent on it. Sam tells you so, straight up, in his new essay ("People have an innate desire to create and to be useful to each other, and AI will allow us to amplify our own abilities like never before"). It's as if you and I have been forcibly heaved into seats on a crowded train to a Dystopian Elsewhere. Our destination is still under construction, but the po-faced conductor with vocal fry promises we're totally gonna love it. Don't Miss: OpenAI CTO thinks AI will kill some jobs that shouldn’t have existed in the first place The post ‘I am so freaking tired of all the AI hype’: Reaction to Sam Altman’s latest bluster appeared first on BGR. Today's Top Deals Today’s deals: $199 iPad 9, $99 TP-Link WiFi 7 router, $400 off Narwal Freo X Ultra robot vacuum, more Today’s deals: $510 M1 MacBook Air, $54 11-piece cookware set, $40 Anker MagSafe battery pack, more Today’s deals: $20 Amazon credit, 23% off Galaxy Z Flip 6, $50 Ninja blender, $48 Anker ANC earbuds, more Today’s deals: $129 AirPods 3, Nintendo Switch game sale, $30 Fire TV Stick 4K, $16 TOZO earbuds, more