The post Now You Can Build ANY Shed In A Weekend Even If You’ve Zero Woodworking Experience! appeared first on Prepper Website.

The post Flour from Mesquite appeared first on Prepper Website.

The post Sunlight and Chickens: What You Need to Know appeared first on Prepper Website.

The post The Entire System Is Crumbling! Major Red Flags Are Popping Up For Banks, Small Businesses And Retailers appeared first on Prepper Website.

The post 18 Startling Realities About Life During a Nuclear Winter appeared first on Prepper Website.

Another week, another phony Supreme Court justice scandal covered by ABC’s The View. This one being especially , only Whoopi Goldberg tried to insist it was actually a scandal. On Tuesday morning’s segment, the group discussed a deceptive audio secretly taken in hopes of embarrassing both Justice Samuel Alito and his wife. The tape, being of no great consequence, only highlighting the justice’s faith, once again, sent Whoopi on a tangent, calling for the necessity of a class action suit! Surprisingly, many of the other hosts disagreed. This secretly taped audio was taken by Lauren Windsor, a liberal activist, who specializes in the deception of politicians with her faux conservative persona and Whoopi wondered, “Why can't we sue them in a class action suit?... I don't know why you can't pull a class action suit that says, listen, you are no longer doing the job you're supposed to be doing. I don't understand.” However, even Sara Haines and Alyssa didn’t see what the big deal was stating: HAINES: I don't like how these were obtained. I don't think this woman presented as something she wasn't, she lied then she did this gotcha moment. And I thought it was worse in the headlines than what I heard on the ground because I did listen to more of the tapes.     She continues, complimenting Chief Justice Alito in handling the ill intentioned reporter: HAINES: Alito goes on to say, it sounds like he's being polite to this woman because she seems a little nutty. She's leading every question and he's sitting there. Eventually he says, the Court has a limited role and Justice Roberts handled it like a pro and this is where you always talk, Sunny, as a lawyer, judges, they're trained in this. They are allowed to be highly religious people and not then adjudicate in that same vein.\ (...)  Justice Roberts says, ‘I am not – you do not want me deciding morals in this country. That's for your elected officials.’ And then as she said she wanted to return to a Judeo-Christian or something Christian-- and he said, ‘but I have Muslim friends, I have Jewish friends.’ So, I don't know if this completely disqualifies and I think it's, it is a little dangerous to dance into delegitimizing the highest court in the land. I don't like the structure of it right now, but as we say about democracy and everything being up in flames, to do that to this court as we're trying to reinstill faith in institutions, I don't see it as egregious when I read into it. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: Well and I had the same take that I think Chief Justice Roberts answered the way I would have expected, any Supreme Court justice of all time to answer. Acknowledging the role of the court to uphold the law, to interpret the Constitution but decisions around the morality or direction of the country are left to Congress, the representatives of the people and I think people need this constant civic reminder of how our three branches of government work. It is surprising enough that Haines and Farah Griffin are so outspoken regarding the topic, especially as they, in many ways, have played into delegitimizing the Court in the many petty stories regarding the justices in the past few weeks. Yet, beyond the outrageous call for a class action lawsuit against the court made by Whoopi on Tuesday morning, The View was a pleasant surprise The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View 6/11/2024 11:04:03 AM EST Run Time: 7 minutes 55 seconds   WHOOPI GOLDBERG: So if these recordings are legit, does this compromise finally Alito's ability to serve on the Supreme Court? JOY BEHAR: Well, I have to say I have a problem with it a little bit, because this other group, ‘Veritas’  –  GOLBERG: Yes, yes BEHAR: – what are they called GOLDBERG: You remember them, this is what they did. BEHAR: – ‘Project Veritas’, it's the same thing but they infiltrated liberals so it goes both ways.  GOLDBERG: Yeah BEHAR: So, I have a little bit of a problem because it can be altered also. But the Supreme Court at the moment is so biased and so pro-theocracy as you saw in what we just watched, that somebody has to expose them because they are running around arrogant and they have the whole GOP on their side and we're losing the Supreme Court's objectivity and somebody needs to expose them. So, and they have no consequences whatsoever these people. They're there for the rest of their lives. GOLDBERG: Why can't we sue them in a class action suit? Why can’t it be the U-- BEHAR: I'm not sure you can do that. They're the highest court. GOLDBERG: Yeah but I don’t know why? Listen, I don't know why you can't pull a class action suit that says, listen, you are no longer doing the job you're supposed to be doing. I don't understand. BEHAR: The question is does Roberts have the “bazooz” – That's the word I learned somewhere. But we all know what it is. The “bazooz” to tell these people to recuse themselves, especially in the cases of Trump. SUNNY HOSTIN: Well you know I think it's like corralling cats for Justice Roberts. I think he wants to maintain the integrity of the court. I think that's very important to him. I think it's very difficult with the composition of this particular court. It is a lifetime appointment. I am extremely disappointed at what I heard, but I also am not comfortable with snippets of tape recordings without consent being taken out of context. BEHAR: It's legal, right? HOSTIN: It is legal if there is a one-party consent state and this is done in D.C., which it is a one-party consent district. My problem is, this happens to us at the table all the time. We have a full on conversation, someone takes a clip of what we say, they blow it out of proportion. GOLDBERG: Do you think that's what was here? You think this was blown out of proportion? HOSTIN: Well, I didn’t hear – I didn't hear everything and so I'm uncomfortable with this sort of hit job. But I will say this, in my lifetime as an attorney I never knew the religion of the Supreme Court Justices.  GOLDBERG: Never HOSTIN: I never knew the political affiliations of the Supreme Court Justices. They are supposed to be the highest court in the land and really in the world, the world looks to the Supreme Court. And this kind of thing compromises the Supreme Court and Justice Sotomayor said it so well, “How does a Supreme Court recover from the stench coming from the court at this point?” SARA HAINES: Well I think, Sunny what you’re saying is – I actually agree with both of you. I don't like how these were obtained. I don't think this woman presented as something she wasn't, she lied then she did this gotcha moment. And I thought it was worse in the headlines than what I heard on the ground because I did listen to more of the tapes, and -- HOSTIN: Did you listen to all of them, though. HAINES: What was posted. HOSTIN: What was posted? HAINES: All of them but is still a clip bit. But Alito goes on to say –  it sounds like he's Alito goes on to say, it sounds like he's being polite to this woman because she seems a little nutty. She's leading every question and he's sitting there. Eventually he says, the Court has a limited role and Justice Roberts handled it like a pro and this is where you always talk, Sunny, as a lawyer, judges, they're trained in this. They are allowed to be highly religious people and not then adjudicate in that same vein. HOSTIN: And they should not. HAINES: Justice Roberts says, at one point to this woman, presenting the same way trying to guide him down the road. He says, “I am not – you do not want me deciding morals in this country. That's for your elected officials.” And then as she said she wanted to return to a Judeo-Christian or something Christian-- and he said, "but I have Muslim friends, I have Jewish friends.” So, I don't know if this completely disqualifies and I think it's, it is a little dangerous to dance into delegitimizing the highest court in the land. I don't like the structure of it right now, but as we say about democracy and everything being up in flames, to do that to this court as we're trying to reinstill faith in institutions, I don't see it as egregious when I read into it. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: Well and I had the same take that I think Chief Justice Roberts answered the way I would have expected, any Supreme Court justice of all time to answer.  HOSTIN: Especially the chief justice. FARAH GRIFFIN: Acknowledging the role of the court to uphold the law, to interpret the Constitution but decisions around the morality or direction of the country are left to Congress, the representatives of the people and I think people need this constant civic reminder of how our three branches of government work. What I took issue with and I actually see -- I agree with all on the -- we've got to hear the whole thing and context  – but I in general don't like language that's risen in this moment of political polarization where you talk about the other side as the enemy –  HOSTIN: Yes FARAH GRIFFIN: – or as if we're in a battle where both sides are actually active players with a valid role in American democracy. The religious right, the Muslim you know, the Muslim faith, these things have always existed in America and found ways to co-exist. The liberal left. And been able to say, like, you may have certain viewpoints we’re going find a place in the middle but the diminishing of one side as though they don’t have a role is dangerous and it’s dangerous if the left does it and where we say we need to eradicate, you know the Christian right as well -- GOLDBERG: I’m going to, I’m going to say, because I don't agree with y'all which is unusual. HOSTIN: The view. GOLDBERG: That's right, that’s what I always say. Because I listened to you all talk about how, you know,  Democrats don't get out there and they don't -- so, this woman got out there and did exactly what you all have been saying she should do. HAINES: Not this way. GOLDBERG: Well, that's not -- it never comes across that way. It comes across, they're not doing it, why isn't it happening and so I'm saying, here we are, someone has done the same thing that cinema veritas or whatever the name of that group is that really, you know, it's not like we're not aware that this money has gone through. You know, they've destroyed people. HOSTIN: Yes. GOLDBERG: Those people destroyed people so I'm not advocating that. I'm happy to finally hear someone say something that makes justice -- HAINES: Alito? GOLDBERG: -- Alito – and HOSTIN: Roberts? GOLDBERG: No. BEHAR: Thomas. GOLDBERG: Thomas. To explain how do you take that money from these people who are there for that reason? This whole -- well, you know, it is a conversation that should be had and I know what the Justices are supposed to be doing. I remember as I've said to you many times, people get on as Supreme Court justices and they learn how to do the job. HOSTIN: Yes. GOLDBERG: Because we've had people who led the KKK, you know, we've had all kinds of people on the Supreme Court who get in there and then have to do it for the people. BEHAR: Yeah. GOLDBERG: Unfortunately, these two don't seem to have that same kind of -- BEHAR: But they're supposed to have a leader like Roberts who supposed to tell them things like that. GOLDBERG: Well, yes, and they don't seem to be paying attention. And this is when I, this is why I say I would like there to be some kind of thing that says, no, nobody gets away with this. HOSTIN: Some sort of -- GOLDBERG: Some sort of consequence. HOSTIN: – consequence. There is an ethics now. GOLDBERG: I see it. HOSTIN: There is an ethics rule. GOLDBERG: I know. BEHAR: Oh, you have a legal note. HOSTIN: Oh I do. An ethics code now for the justices that has never been in existence and I think that's a start but I agree with you. There must be consequences. GOLDBERG: Has to be something. HOSTIN: To reinstill the integrity of the court. HAINES: And faith in the court. HOSTIN: And faith in the court but I have a legal note. GOLDBERG: Right, I know. HOSTIN: Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito and his wife did not respond to requests for comment. The Supreme Court Historical Society condemned the recordings. WHOOPI: We’ll be right back.      

MSNBC’s Joy Reid devoted a significant portion of Monday’s night’s episode of The ReidOut to launching yet another attack on Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and his wife, Martha-Ann. Reid celebrated a secret recording by leftist Lauren Windsor attempting to expose and embarrass the Alitos as conservative crazies.  Reid began with her standard, generalizing smear of conservative justices, alleging that they have become increasingly defiant and corrupt. “A number of these conservative justices have become emboldened and even self righteous, particularly Alito, whose power has grown alongside his public grievances with the secular direction of American society,” she proclaimed. She rehashed Alito’s past offenses before turning to “blockbuster new audio” recorded by Windsor, whom she praised for the deceptive tactics she employed in attempting to elicit views that would incriminate Alito as partisan. In the audio, he stated the simple fact “one side or the other is going to win,” admitting that peaceful collaboration between both sides was possible, though necessarily difficult due to extreme polarization of values.     To Reid, Alito was a clearly biased, Christian nationalist for agreeing with Windsor’s outrageous suggestion that “people in this country who believe in God have got to keep fighting for that, to return our country to a place of godliness.” She juxtaposed Alito’s “shocking” response with that of Chief Justice John Roberts who maintained that “It's our job to decide the cases as best we can.” Reid was astounded that “[Alito] seemed undeterred by the fact that you're someone he doesn't know personally, and he was willing to say a lot to you,” as if he should have felt the need to conceal his beliefs for fear of exaggerated condemnation from rabid hosts such as herself. She switched gears to mock Alito’s wife Martha-Ann who, in the audio, wisecracked about filing a defamation lawsuit against the media upon Justice Alito’s retirement from the Supreme Court. Even more offensive to Reid was her desire to design a flag of the Sacred Heart of Jesus as a counter to the rainbow flags inordinately displayed during “Pride Month” (June is traditionally venerated as the month of the Sacred Heart in the Catholic Church). Windsor, by this point evidently lacking in verbal ammunition, stumbled through her opinion on Martha-Ann’s “rant”: Well, um, throughout this, uh, sort of rant, there was a lot of, you know, it just–aggression and, you know, against the media, getting even, and it felt like, you know, another instance of getting even, ‘shame, shame,’ and at one point she talked about being German, and I really had more of the impression that she was Italian by the way that she was talking about it. Reid weakly attempted a further gibe, replying, “And she said ‘I'm German and that i–and you’ll n–you just can't believe how much I can, I can come at you and give, uh, more, uh, revenge.’” Alito’s assessment of the media in the recording, then, undeniably rings true: “It's easy to blame the media, but I do blame them because they do nothing but criticize us. And so they have really eroded trust in the Court.” The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: MSNBC’s The ReidOut 6/10/2024 07:03:49 PM EST JOY REID: A number of these conservative justices have become emboldened and even self righteous, particularly Alito, whose power has grown alongside his public grievances with the secular direction of American society. In 1985, while applying for a job in the Reagan administration, he explained what drew him into conservative–into government and politics, writing, quote, “The greatest influences on my views were the writings of William F. Buckley Jr., and the National Review, and Barry Goldwater's 1964 campaign.” You know, the Barry Goldwater who opposed the Civil Rights Act. He added that he had particularly opposed a number of Warren Court rulings that led to the most expansive civil rights era in American history.  In 2008, after being on the court for nearly three years, Alito spoke at a fund-raising gala for a right-wing magazine. After disparaging President Obama, he went on to criticize the, quote, “legal vanguard” that imagined that “law would move dramatically” leftward after the Warren Court. He ended by saying, they turned out to be wrong. Alito disrespected President Obama again during a 2010 State of the Union address, after the president correctly criticized the Citizens United decision that kicked open the flood gates–to billionaires like Leonard Leo and Alito’s and Clarence Thomas’ benefactors–to buy up politics and apparently our courts.  Then there was that time, months after he penned the Dobbs decision overturning Roe, when Alito attended an event in Rome and complained about the rise in secularism. Unprompted, he went on to complain that world leaders dared to question his ruling. [Cuts to video] JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO: I had the honor this term of writing, I think, the only Supreme Court decision in the history of that institution that has been lambasted by a whole string of foreign leaders, who felt perfectly fine commenting on American law. One of these was former Prime Minister Boris Johnson. But he paid the price. (transition) All I am going to say is that ultimately, if we are going to win the battle to protect religious freedom in an increasingly secular society, we will need more than positive law. [Cuts back to live] REID: He added that if religious liberty is protected, then men and women of faith will be able to speak out on social issues, which is exactly what he's been doing. And while he likes speaking up, he doesn't like being called out. Alito posted an unprecedented rebuke of ProPublica in the Rupert Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, before ProPublica posted a stunning report that he had accepted a luxury fishing trip from Republican mega-donor Paul Singer, who had active cases in front of the Supreme Court.  That's all before the upside down flag, the upside down American flag, I should note, and the “Jesus at the insurrection” flag flew at his homes. And, also, that's just the stuff Sam Alito’s been saying in public, which kinda makes you wonder what he's been saying behind closed doors. Well, there's blockbuster new audio today that gives us some insight into that. It comes from progressive activist and documentarian Lauren Windsor. Ms. Windsor, who is known for approaching high profile conservative figures, pretending to be an ally and then recording them making candid comments, spoke to Justice Alito at the Supreme Court Historical Society's annual dinner earlier this month, where she asked him about political polarization. [Cuts to audio] LAUREN WINDSOR: As a Catholic and as someone who, like, really cherishes my faith, I just don't–I don't know that we can negotiate with the left in the way that, like, needs to happen for the polarization to end. I think that it's a matter of, like, winning. ALITO: I think you're probably right. I mean, one side or the other–one side or the other is going to win. I don't know. I mean, there can be a way of working–a way of living together peacefully, but it's difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can't be compromised, you know. They really can't be compromised. So it's not like you can split the difference. WINDSOR: And that's what I'm saying. I think that the solution really is, like, winning the moral argument. Like, people in this country who believe in God have got to keep fighting for that, to return our country to a place of godliness. ALITO: Oh, I agree with you. I agree with you. [Cuts back to live] REID: And just to underscore how unusual that kind of response is from a Supreme Court justice, here is Chief Justice John Roberts after being asked a similar question by Ms. Windsor. [Cuts to audio] WINDSOR: You don't think there's, like, a role for the Court in, like, guiding us toward a more moral path? CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS: No, I think the role for the Court is deciding the cases. If I start–would you want me to be in charge of guiding us toward a more moral path? That's for the people we elect. That's not the lawyers. WINDSOR: Well, I guess I just–I believe that the Founders were godly, like, were Christians. And I think that we live in a Christian nation, and that our Supreme Court should be guiding us in that path. ROBERTS: I don’t know if that’s true. Yeah, I don't know that we live in a Christian nation. I know a lot of Jewish and Muslim friends who would say maybe not. And it's not our job to do that. It's our job to decide the cases as best we can. [Cuts back to live] REID: Joining me now is the creator and executive producer of The Undercurrent, Lauren Windsor, whose voice you just heard in those secret recordings. We should also note that Lauren attended this dinner as a dues-paying member of the Society under her real name. Lauren, thank you for being here. WINDSOR: Thank you, Joy.  REID: Welcome back to the show. Uh, “One side or the other is going to win. It's not like we can split the difference.” These are shocking comments. But, before I get to how you reacted–how you internally reacted to them, I do want to just underscore that. How did you get into this, uh, this event? WINDSOR: Uh, I was a dues-paying member. I bought a ticket. REID: Were you surprised–because there's another part of your recording where you say, “Hey, I talked to you in 2022,” but Alito kept talking. He didn’t seem unde–he seemed undeterred by the fact that you're someone he doesn't know personally, and he was willing to say a lot to you. WINDSOR: Well, so, it was 2023, um, and I included both of the interactions there just so people could see that, you know, um, I think some of the criticism is “Oh, well he was just, uh, agreeing with you,” or, uhh, whatnot, but look at his answer in 2023. It was different. It was “No, we don't have a role. I don't know, I don't know.” And, it was also contrasted to Roberts' answer. REID: Let me play that. Let me play that. This is Justice Alito in 2023 also talking to you, Lauren WIndsor, and talking about the media. Take a listen. [Cuts to audio] WINDSOR: Like, this is, like, the last bastion of I think, like, public trust. And, like, how do we get back to that? ALITO: I wish I knew. I don't know. It's easy to blame the media, but I do blame them because they do nothing but criticize us. And so they have really eroded trust in the Court. I don't know. I really don't know. I mean, ordinary people–ordinary isn't the right word–American citizens in general need to work on this, to try to heal this polarization because it's very dangerous. I do believe it's dangerous. [Cuts back to live] REID: So he had a very different answer back then. WINDSOR: Yeah. REID: Um, were you surprised at how candid he was about saying “One side or the other is going to win. It's not like we can split the difference.” He's essentially saying–he's agreeing, “Yes, we need to win this culture war.” WINDSOR: Yes, of course. I mean, uh, when the first interaction happened, I was, like, okay, well, it's very hard to get a judge, a justice, even lower level judges to talk about politics, anything that might imply politics, to give any sort of hint or signal as to what their own opinions may be. And, so, after that first interaction, I didn't publish it because it wasn't very newsworthy. Interesting, but not newsworthy. But I felt, like, in the course of the last year–because that was before the spotlight was on him with ProPublica. So, I felt like that grievance was more piqued over the past year with his own experience. And, so, I wanted to see if he had a different reaction. REID: And he certainly did. Uh, let's talk about Martha-Ann.  WINDSOR: (Laughs) REID: Uh, Justice Alito has blamed Martha-Ann, his wife, and said “It is her flag, she’s the one who flew them, it’s her fault that there was an upside down American flag and then a, uh, what is it–”consent to Jesus” or, or… WINDSOR: Appeal to Heaven. REID: Appeal to Heaven flag, uh, outside their, uh, g–vacation home. Let me play for you–and this is new audio, it just recently went up on your social media, and on RollingStone. Here is Martha-Ann Alito, and you go up to her and you start by saying, “Hey, I'm a big fan of your husband,” and let's hear what happens after that. [Cuts to audio] WINDSOR: I'm a huge fan of your husband, and, um, everything that you're going through, I just want to tell you that, like– MARTHA–ANN ALITO: It's okay! It's okay! WINDSOR: Well, it's not okay, though. It's not okay. ALITO: It's okay. It’s okay because if they come back to me, I'll get them. I'm going to be liberated and I'm going to get them. WINDSOR: What do you mean by “they”? ALITO: Oh, well, there's a five-year defamation statute of limitations. WINDSOR: And, I don't know what you mean by “they,” like, by “get them.” ALITO: The media. WINDSOR: Oh, okay. ALITO: Come on, come on. I'll get you. Come on. [Cuts back to live] REID: (Laughs). I am normally not speechless. “I'll get them, I'm gonna get them. I'll be liberated and I'm gonna get them.” She talks about a five-year defamation statute of liber– of limitations. We know that there are conservative legal groups who would like to allow the media to be sued for defamation. Donald Trump talks about it all the time. Do you think that's what she was talking about? WINDSOR: Well, uh, I certainly feel like, yeah, she would like to go after the media, but the implication here with the five-year statute of limitations is that Justice Alito will be retired by then. And he would only retire– REID: If there’s a conservative, yes. WINDSOR: If Trump were in the White House again.  REID: Sure. WINDSOR: So she’s–there's an assumption there that Trump wins the White House. And, so, that adds an additional layer of self-interest to all of these decisions that he's deciding because he's thinking about impending retirement– REID: Sure. WINDSOR: –amongst other things. REID: Yeah, I'm quite sure that the moment Donald Trump is inaugurated they'll retire probably a day, uh, after that. There’s another piece and this one is even more bizarre but, I think, also more relevant since she is the one who Samuel Alito blamed for the various flags that flew both at their home and their vacation home. Here is Martha-Ann Alito talking about flags. Take a listen. [Cuts to audio] ALITO: You know what I want? I want a Sacred Heart of Jesus flag, because I have to look across the lagoon at the pride flag for the next month. WINDSOR: Exactly! ALITO: And he's like, “Oh, please, don't put up a flag.” I said, I won't do it because I'm deferring to you, but when you are free of this nonsense, I'm putting it up and I'm going to send them a message every day, maybe every week, I'll be changing the flags. There’ll be all kinds–I made a flag in my head, this is how I satisfy myself. I made a flag. It's white and it has yellow and orange flames around it, and in the middle is the word “vergogna.” “Vergogna” in Italian means shame. REID: (Mispronouncing) Fegonia. For those of you who did not hear that clearly, I'm just gonna reread this to you because I think you need to understand what she said. This is Mrs. Samuel Alito. “You know what I want? I want a Sacred Heart of Jesus flag because I have to look across the lagoon at the pride flag for the next month.” Then she says, “Oh, please don't put up a flag, he’s like–and he's like”–she means Samuel Alito– “Oh, please don't put up a flag.” She said, “I won't do it because I'm deferring to you, but when you are free of this nonsense, I'm putting it up and I’m going to send them a message every day. Maybe every week I’ll be changing the flags. They'll be all kinds. I made a flag in my head. That’s how I satisfy myself. I made a flag. It's white and it has yellow and orange flames around it and in the middle of it is the word vegonia. Vegonia.” She emphasized that as an Italian word that means shame. What were your immediate thoughts after hearing that? WINDSOR: Well, um, throughout this, uh, sort of rant, there was a lot of, you know, it just–aggression and, you know, against the media, getting even, and it felt like, you know, another instance of getting even, “shame, shame,” and at one point she talked about being German, and I really had more of the impression that she was Italian by the way that she was talking about it. REID: (Laughs) The (inaudible) the vegonia.  WINDSOR: Yes, exactly. REID: And she said “I'm German and that i–and you’ll n–you just can't believe how much I can, I can come at you and give, uh, more, uh, revenge. Vegonia. Lauren Windsor, congratulations. This is a huge scoop, uh, perhaps your biggest yet. Thank you for bringing it to The Reidout. WINDSOR: Thank you. REID: Much appreciated. And we'll be right back. (...)

Several immigrants with possible ties to the ISIS terror groups were caught in a sting operation after they crossed into the U.S. via the southern border. The New York Post reported that its sources told them six possible terrorists had been caught in the sting operation in Los Angeles, New York, and Philadelphia. Two others were arrested after being surveilled for “several months” by a Joint Terrorism Task Force.The immigrants had initially been "fully vetted" and cleared to remain the country. After they gained entry, officials grew suspicious of the group after hearing derogatory comments on a wiretap.The foreign nationals are said to be from Tajikistan, a former Soviet Republic in central Asia. One of the suspects allegedly made comments regarding a bomb, according to the Post. "Remember the Boston marathon [bombing]? I’m afraid something like that might happen again or worse," said a source to the Post. 'Individuals or small groups will draw twisted inspiration from the events in the Middle East to carry out attacks here at home.'The FBI and Department of Homeland Security released a joint statement about the report. “Over the last few days, ICE agents arrested several non-citizens pursuant to immigration authorities. The actions were carried out in close coordination with the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces. The individuals arrested are detained in ICE custody pending removal proceedings," the statement read. "As the FBI and DHS have recently described in public and partner bulletins, the U.S. has been in a heightened threat environment," it added. "The FBI and DHS will continue working around the clock with our partners to identify, investigate, and disrupt potential threats to national security. ”At least two of the men are believed to have crossed the border during spring 2023. CBS News reported that sources told them there was no evidence of an active terror attack being plotted by the group. The report is especially alarming after Tajikistani terrorists attacked civilians in a horrific attack at the Crocus City concert hall in a suburb near Moscow in March. 145 people were killed, and hundreds were injured. ISIS-K later took credit for the massacre. FBI Director Christopher Wray has previously testified to Congress about the threat of a possible terror attack in the U.S. from militants crossing the border among other migrants. “Our most immediate concern has been that individuals or small groups will draw twisted inspiration from the events in the Middle East to carry out attacks here at home,” said Wray to a House Appropriations subcommittee. “But now, increasingly concerning is the potential for a coordinated attack here in the homeland, akin to the ISIS-K attack we saw at the Russia concert hall a couple weeks ago.” Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Two female teachers resigned after a Janesville School District probe found that they had sent sexually explicit messages and photos to at least one student of a high school in Wisconsin. Joseph Craig High School officials were tipped off to the inappropriate conduct after a teacher saw photos of Alexsia Saldaris, her colleague, in lingerie on a cellphone of one of the students on April 11. The teacher reported it to officials, and they opened an investigation into the teacher. '... involving cuddling, flirting, and the implication of alcohol.' The probe found that Saldaris and another business education teacher, Jennifer Larson, had sent messages via Snapchat to one student while they were all on a field trip between April 7 and April 9. The messages included suggestions of "cuddling" and including another student in their "fun," according to WMTV-TV. Saldaris also allegedly allowed the student to "take a lap" with the district van in a parking lot and kissed the student in the van while she was taking off her shoes. The report said that Saldaris then sent the student five images of herself in lingerie and other undergarments on April 9. Other messages indicated that they planned to meet on the weekend. Saldaris admitted to sending the images while Larson admitted to sending messages “involving cuddling, flirting, and the implication of alcohol," according to the report. At one point, Saldaris had reportedly sent a message telling the student that their relationship had to end, and he agreed. Both teachers were placed on administrative leave on April 12, and the district accepted their resignations on April 22. Saldaris had only been a teacher for one year while Larson was an 11-year veteran. Larson was also the school advisor for the Wisconsin DECA, a group focused on fostering leadership skills in young people. WMTV said that the school had concluded its investigation and the Janesville Police were considering filing criminal charges over the incidents. Janesville is a city of about 65k residents on the southern border of Wisconsin. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WaPo: Iron Dome Defense Perpetuates Israel-Gaza Conflict