The world is a big, strange place! Especially Bulgaria I guess. At first I thought this was Macron’s wife…. Then I thought it was fake…. But it’s apparently neither. Meet the Princess of Bulgaria: Initially I thought this was an AI generated image, but apparently the person on the right is Princess Kalina of Bulgaria. I don’t even know what to say. pic.twitter.com/vsGfzHK6PV — VINCENT OSHANA (@VincentOshana) June 15, 2024 I have Fact-Checked it and that is indeed an accurate, unedited photo. You can find the source here. Two things immediately jump out at you…. One is the face, which appears almost non-human and definitely non-feminine (more on that in a minute) and the other are the arms which look like they could benchpress a house: The Princess of Bulgaria seems to be lifting … pic.twitter.com/ss5yaf4LpU — Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) June 14, 2024 She apparently used to look like this on the left and now looks like this on the right: DEVELOPING: The princess of Bulgaria is going viral for her new appearance. Fans believe she looks completely different from the photo on the left which is how she used to look. pic.twitter.com/j3bc812WvK — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) June 15, 2024 Historical pictures of what was once a beautiful woman: Just stumbled down the Princess Kalina of Bulgaria rabbit hole and now I need to see her life story on the big screen. pic.twitter.com/zi6ZjAVjpA — Huff (@Huff4Congress) June 14, 2024 Before and after: Princess Kalina of Bulgaria before and after. Just a thought, but if humans “feel”they need change, maybe chill for a second before morphing into…whatever this is. pic.twitter.com/O3FdZAJBZM — FoxyFarmer (@GardensR4Health) June 14, 2024 So is this just a case of vanity and plastic surgery gone awry? Maybe not the best surgeons in Bulgaria? Some reports claim she had a dental infection that led to many (failed) surgeries: Sad part is , this was Princess Kalina of Bulgaria before… She suffered some kind of dental infection which spread to other parts of her face – She had plastic surgeries (obviously failed) to reconstruct . pic.twitter.com/xHMv8n2YAT — Lyra Korvin (@Zero2Crow) June 14, 2024 Grok reports the following: Now let’s talk about Macron’s wife, because the resemblance here at least to me is uncanny…. Take a look: French President Macron was 16 years oldHis teacher Brigette was 40 and married Her son was 3 years older than Macron Brigette groomed Macron as a young kid, divorced her husband, and married him Why don’t people talk about this? pic.twitter.com/nofCglAF4M — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 3, 2024 Macron was indeed a minor when his future wife Brigette seduced him when she was 40. Unreal. This kind of perversion needs to be discussed as who knows the negative effects its had on Macron as an adult. Are his failures as a leader linked to his sęxual abuse as a child? pic.twitter.com/3YCXwI5p56 — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) March 3, 2024 Video of Macron’s wife, Bridget: This is Macron’s wife What do you see? pic.twitter.com/sVdZ6wA8Sr — MAVERICK X (@MAVERIC68078049) March 19, 2024 More here: EMMANUEL MACRONS WIFE BRIGITTE IS A MAN She is really Jean-Michel Trogneux (which is the name of Brigitte Macron’s supposed brother) No pictures of Brigitte before her 30s have been produced, and no pictures or appearances of her brother have been seen since Brigitte Macron… pic.twitter.com/my1Mf8AjWq — Redpill Drifter (@RedpillDrifter) March 13, 2024 Want to go DEEP down the Macron rabbit hole? Let’s do this…. French President Macron’s Wife Sues Over Conspiracy Theory About Her Identity “The game is on, Watson!” For tonight’s mystery, we have The Case of The Swapped Sibling, involving French President Emmanuel Macron’s wife, Brigitte. And unlike other cases, you will get to participate. Yes, you the reader will get to interact. You up for it? Right. Let’s dive in then, shall we? When looking at the facts though, keep in mind the words of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” Additionally, in the case of ‘this or that’ the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. Were the Twin Towers taken down by aeroplanes or explosive devices on 9/11? The answer is in the middle, of course. The concealed third option is where the truth tends to hide. What turned them to dust is the real question? But that’s a case for another time. What we have on our hands is a French conspiracy that has France’s First Lady being accused of being the same person as her brother. She is now suing those that brought the subject to light, choosing to fight them in court. Very curious course of action. Why not simply produce some documents, such as a photos from her childhood or even a meeting with her brother? But the two are never seen together. Like Superman and Clark Kent. Anyone heard if Big Mike and Barry are suing anyone?Emmanuel Macron Breaks Silence on Claims Wife Is Trans After Paper Publishes Details of Defamation Ruling Against Women Who Spread Theory https://t.co/K1VYFTMsHK — Smokehouse Casey (@smokehousecasey) March 14, 2024 New York Post reports: France’s elegant first lady, Brigitte Macron, is about to take the extraordinary step of going to trial in a Paris court to fight a conspiracy theory — amplified last month by American conservative commentator Candace Owens — that she was born a man. Brigitte, 70, has long been the subject of fascination because of her marriage to the much younger Emmanuel Macron, 46. The two met in northern France when he was a 15-year-old student and she was his drama teacher, and wed in 2007. But now wild claims, made by two female French Internet influencers, that she was actually born Jean-Michel Trogneux and became a trans woman in the 1980s have electrified France. The French scornfully call it part of the burgeoning “complosphère,” or world of conspiracy theories. Mme. Macron’s libel trial is set for June, where she will face off against the right-wing accuser and freelance journalist Natacha Rey, who hides behind avatars to push rumors that powerful members of the French establishment are hiding Brigitte’s true identity. Emmanuel Macron has angrily hit back at the rumors, calling them “false and fabricated.” He was unusually candid and emotional about the ongoing speculation about his wife, whom he married in 2007. “The worst thing is the false information and fabricated scenarios,” Macron said at an International Women’s Day event in Paris in February after he guaranteed the right to abortion in France’s Constitution. “People eventually believe them and disturb you, even in your intimacy.” The bizarre saga began back in December 2021 when Rey, 49, a self-described freelance journalist and Amandine Roy, 53, who calls herself a clairvoyant, made a now-deleted YouTube video as part of Roy’s online show “Mediumsation,” in which they claimed that Brigitte was born as a baby boy called Jean-Michel Trogneux in 1953. Trogneux is Brigitte’s maiden name, and Jean-Michel is her older brother. The conspiracy theory first surfaced in an article written by Rey in the far-right French magazine “Faits et Documents” after Macron was first elected president of France in 2017. The women also alleged that Brigitte Macron’s first husband, André-Louis Auzière, had never actually existed. The two, who were married from 1974 to 2006, shared three children: daughters Tiphaine, 40, and Laurence, 47, and son Sébastien, 49. Auzière passed away in 2019 at age 68.   Get out your magnifying glass and let’s compare these faces. The top row of teeth look identical. Front two are the same. And the two on either side of them have the same exact slant. Do brothers and sisters usually have the same exact incisors? The nose is identical. The wrinkle on the left side of the nose, that sort of has an arrow look to it, are both present. And then there’s the horizontal wrinkle under the nose. They both have that? I deduce these are in fact the same person. Seems like an open and shut case, doesn’t it? But us detective types need to look at the rest of the clues. Is she a female? Is she a ‘trans’ female? The truth may lie in the middle, in the third option. At this stage of the Great Awakening, and with all the layers of lies these people hide under, I wouldn’t be surprised if that photo of ‘her brother’ was simply her on testosterone therapy. That photo of ‘her brother’ looks a bit feminine to me. Was it a case of Brigitte raised to be a ‘trans’ male and changed her mind? Many do. Let’s look at some of the facts: She has the overall small frail frame that is generally found more often among woman. And let’s look at her ring finger. But first, here’s the part where you get to participate. It’s fairly simple. All I need you to do is to hold out your hand, straighten your fingers and put them together. Right. Now is your ring finger the same length or shorter than your index (pointer) finger? If so, chances are you’re female. Or is your ring finger is longer than your index finger. If so, chances are you’re male. Well done. You’re well on your way to being a sleuth extraordinaire. Now look at Macron’s wife’s rather small hand. The ring finger is clearly shorter than the index finger. Though, this isn’t always the tell-tale clue, but it is a good starting point. Add up the anatomy details we can gather so far and it points to the fact that this person exhibits many female traits. Am I saying she has a brother? No. Let’s not forget this lady has 0 photos of herself from the first 30 years of her life. Clearly deception is at play. This episode is blowing up so I just want to say—After looking into this, I would stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man. Any journalist or publication that is trying to dismiss this plausibility is immediately identifiable as… — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) March 12, 2024 Fellow sleuth Candance Owens posted a link to a video that went over this transinvestigation. Stop everything and watch this! Not a joke or an exaggeration to say that barring political assassinations, this is likely the biggest scandal that has ever happened in politics in human history. #JeanMichelTrogneuxhttps://t.co/8RasOT78oy — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) March 11, 2024 Curious that the video is now gone. But I found it nonetheless: I end my investigation concluding that there is no sibling. And two possiblities remain: Brigitte was born female and lived as a transmale (we see this a lot in Hollywood) and later changed her mind or Brigitte was born male and is currently is a trans female. Confusion is where the enemy excels. Either option, it doesn’t look good for President Macron. What do you deduce? MORE: French President Macron FURIOUS Over Rumors His Wife Is a Transgender We’ve all heard the rumors about “Biiiiiig Mike” but move over Michelle — there’s a new contender in the “First Lady Transgender conversation…. And French President Macron is NOT happy about it. We make absolutely no claims here either way, we’re just reporting. And the report is that Macron is furious about these rumors continuing to persist: Macron Furious Over Persistent Rumors His Wife Is Transgender https://t.co/LL0oBVfHAg #breaking #news — Off The Press (@OffThePress1) March 9, 2024 French President Emmanuel Macron finally addressed transphobic rumors circulating about his wife Brigitte on Friday, dismissing conspiracies that she was assigned male at birth, according to The Daily Mail.https://t.co/t5RRz6eLJB — The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast) March 9, 2024 Here’s what MAGA Kitty writes: It’s very INTERESTING that this news about Macron’s wife allegedly being transgender is breaking now Who knows if she indeed is but, we DO know that she was Macron’s drama teacher in school and they started a “relationship” when he was JUST 15, and she was 40 BUT… look at this From August 2022 in Newsweek quote “Information about France’s President Emmanuel Macron is among the documents the FBI seized from Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate , according to reports. During the seizure of the Florida residence, the FBI is said to have recovered handwritten notes, photos and top-secret materials the former president should have turned over to authorities when leaving the White House. According to a story in Rolling Stone, the federal investigators’ inventory contained items related to Macron listed as “info re: President of France.”” #Macron It’s very INTERESTING that this news about Macron’s wife allegedly being transgender is breaking now Who knows if she indeed is but, we DO know that she was Macron’s drama teacher in school and they started a “relationship” when he was JUST 15, and she was 40 BUT… look… pic.twitter.com/7CfEm3gP3L — MAGA Kitty (@SaveUSAKitty) March 9, 2024 And from Collin Rugg: NEW: French President Emmanuel Macron lashes out after two women came forward accusing his wife of being transgender. The women claim they were intimidated “by the authorities” who allegedly covered up the “state secret.” Macron was only 15 years old when he started dating 40-year-old Brigitte Auzière who was a mother and his teacher. Macron says the allegations that his wife is transgender are false and fabricated. “The worst thing is the false information and fabricated scenarios. People eventually believe them and disturb you, even in your intimacy.” The accusers, 52-year old Amandine Roy and journalist Natacha Rey, claim Brigitte was born a boy named Jean-Michel Trogneux in 1953. NEW: French President Emmanuel Macron lashes out after two women came forward accusing his wife of being transgender. The women claim they were intimidated “by the authorities” who allegedly covered up the “state secret.” Macron was only 15 years old when he started… pic.twitter.com/lXhHeRTQdX — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) March 9, 2024 Here’s more, from The Daily Mail: French President Emmanuel Macron has spoken out for the first time against claims that his wife was born a man – saying the rumours were ‘false and fabricated’. Mr Macron, 47, expressed his anger and frustration about continual speculation about Brigitte Macron, 70, whom he married in 2007. ‘The worst thing is the false information and fabricated scenarios,’ said Mr Macron. ‘People eventually believe them and disturb you, even in your intimacy.’ The president was speaking on International Women’s Day on Friday, after inscribing the guaranteed right to abortion into France’s constitution. He said the transgender claims about Ms Macron were typical of misogynisitic online attacks that women have to put up with every day. Two women who claimed the première dame was born a man were punished with ‘symbolic fines’ reduced on appeal last June. In turn, both claimed they were subjected to ‘intimidation by the authorities’ as ‘ultra protected’ members of the Paris establishment tried to cover up a ‘state secret’. Details of the bizarre case were revived after her own daughter talked publicly about the accusations for the first time. Tiphaine Auzière, 40, told Paris Match magazine: ‘I have concerns about the level of society when I hear what is circulating on social networks about my mother being a man.’ Ms Auzière also discussed how wounded she remained after discovering as a 10-year-old child that her teacher mother was seeing the teenage Emmanuel Macron. The future politician was just 15 when he began a relationship with the then married mother-of-three Brigitte Auzière, who was 40 at the time, and teaching drama at La Providence high school in Amiens, northern France. Those spreading the transgender rumours were Amandine Roy, a 52-year-old clairvoyant, and Natacha Rey, 48, who styled herself as a freelance journalist. Both had appeared on a four-hour YouTube video in December 2021 in which they claimed that Brigitte was in fact born as a baby boy called Jean-Michel Trogneux in 1953. This is the name of Brigitte’s brother, and Ms Macron was called Brigitte Trogneux before her first marriage. The defendants also claimed that Brigitte’s first husband, André-Louis Auzière, had never actually existed before his reported death in 2020, aged 68. A judge sitting at Lisieux, in Normandy, originally fined the two women the equivalent of £1700 each, after finding them both guilty of libel. DEVELOPING: Is French President Emmanuel Macron’s wife transgender? You be the Judge. pic.twitter.com/b7hf4fiOk6 — PO? (@PoliticsOnX) March 9, 2024

The family of the cinematographer, who was killed during the set of the film Rust, has dropped their lawsuit against Alec Baldwin.

President Joe Biden elicited a strange reaction from Argentinian President Javier Milei when, during a meeting with Pope Francis, Biden leaned in and rested his forehead against the Pope’s. Biden met with Pope Francis while he was in Italy for the G-7 meetings with a number of other world leaders, and while he was speaking to the Catholic leader, he kept leaning in closer and closer until finally, the two were forehead to forehead. Pope Francis’ expression was one of mild surprise at the president’s actions, but as Milei turned and saw the scene playing out, he appeared to recoil. Priceless: @JMilei‘s reaction to Biden and Pope ?pic.twitter.com/oU6cheTkaT — Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) June 15, 2024 Milei literally backed away as he realized what was happening, prompting a series of reactions on social media as well. The Babylon Bee made use of the awkward moment, running with the headline, “Biden Disappointed After Huge Scoop Of Vanilla Ice Cream Turns Out To Be Pope Francis.” Biden Disappointed After Huge Scoop Of Vanilla Ice Cream Turns Out To Be Pope Francis https://t.co/eTNGEe0MHx pic.twitter.com/5bLPMEVdjY — The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) June 14, 2024 “Heads up, Your Holiness!” the New York Post added, sharing a video of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s reaction — apparent disbelief — as well. Heads up, Your Holiness! https://t.co/kqUMtcz7aO pic.twitter.com/Ahh3MHjN3V — New York Post (@nypost) June 14, 2024 “Look at Javier Milei’s ‘wtf’ face as he witnesses the exchange between the Pope and Dictator Biden. Lol,” Liz Churchill posted. CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP Look at @JavierMilei_ ‘s ‘wtf’ face as he witnesses the exchange between the Pope and Dictator Biden. Lol. pic.twitter.com/3rgbRDPdeR — Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) June 15, 2024 “The pope doesn’t look like he enjoyed Biden‘s strange head bump greeting. Biden doesn’t know the definition of personal space,” Sara Rose added. The pope doesn’t look like he enjoyed Biden’s strange head bump greeting. Biden doesn’t know the definition of personal space ?pic.twitter.com/JQp6IaHVOL — Sara Rose ??? (@saras76) June 14, 2024 Biden’s trip to Italy for the G-7 meetings was marked by a series of viral video clips that raised questions about the president’s overall fitness for duty — including once when he appeared to wander away as the other world leaders were gathering to take photos, and then a press conference during which he complained that reporters who did not limit their questions to the topic he preferred to address should “play by the rules.”

As Al Ghais says, it is crucial for governments to base energy decisions on the reality of the world at hand, rather than on the desire to continue pushing costly and unrealistic energy fantasies.

Garbage is an American rock band formed in 1993 in Madison, Wisconsin. The band consists of Scottish singer Shirley Manson and American musicians Duke Erikson, Steve Marker, and Butch Vig. Vig is notably one of rock’s most prolific producers, having produced seminal albums such as Nirvana’s Nevermind. Garbage is known for their fusion of alternative rock with electronic music, a sound that garnered them considerable success throughout the 1990s and 2000s. They debuted with their self-titled album in 1995, which was critically acclaimed and sold over four million copies worldwide. To date, Garbage has released seven studio albums, including a The post Complete List Of Garbage Albums And Songs appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.

Editor’s Note: The group quota regime is a revolutionary threat which aims to overthrow the political order of the United States and the Constitution that underlies it. In its maneuvers for political power, this revolutionary enemy already operates on a set of legal and constitutional principles entirely different from those on which our country was founded. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the corrupt prosecution of President Donald Trump, and the attendant, authoritarian insistence that criticism of the machinations of “justice” is unwelcome in a democratic society. In the wake of his conviction in a New York court, President Trump has complained that the process was rigged against him, that the whole proceeding was a corrupt effort to persecute him with a view to influencing the 2024 presidential election. In response, many of his opponents have criticized him for undermining public confidence in our system of criminal justice and thus harming our democracy—a criticism that has been magnified by many in the media. These critics, however, are missing the point and undermining a principle that is in fact essential to preserving our republic: namely, that criticism of the justice system when it errs or overreaches is necessary to preserving freedom under the rule of law. Those who founded our nation were aware of this necessity. Alexander Hamilton, representing the defendant in the famous libel case People v. Croswell, warned that “the most dangerous, the most sure, the most fatal of tyrannies” operated “by selecting and sacrificing single individuals, under the mask and forms of law, by dependent and partial tribunals.” “Against such measures,” Hamilton continued, “we ought to keep a vigilant eye and take a manly stand. Whenever they arise, we ought to resist, and resist till we have hurled the demagogues and tyrants from their imagined thrones.” No sensible American would look back on these remarks and think that, by them, Hamilton was undermining democracy. Hamilton’s great rival, Thomas Jefferson, acted on a similar view. As president, Jefferson pardoned publishers who had been convicted under the Sedition Act of 1798. Jefferson’s course of action here was inseparable from his belief that the Act was unconstitutional and that the courts of the United States had made themselves party to serious injustices by convicting defendants under it. Indeed, the pardoning power is included in the United States Constitution, and in many state constitutions, and is used routinely, precisely because prosecutors and courts can make mistakes and sometimes even willfully abuse their power over the lives and liberties of citizens. These dangers are also recognized in federal law. Title 18 of the United States Code prohibits and punishes “deprivation of rights under color of law.” By its very terms this provision acknowledges that sometimes those entrusted with the administration of justice are themselves guilty of behaving lawlessly and abusively. The United States Department of Justice’s website observes that this provision may be applied not only against “police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards” but also, as appropriate, against “judges, district attorneys,” and “other public officials.” This important provision is itself an acknowledgment by the government that all the proceedings of our justice system are not entitled to uncritical acceptance. Everyone conversant with American history knows that the problem of politicized and corrupt abuses of the justice system has not disappeared in the modern era, that it continues to rear its ugly head precisely when political passions run high and communities are inflamed against leaders for whom they harbor deep animosities. In the 1960s, Alabama state authorities brought Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to trial on charges that he had committed perjury in relation to his tax filings. This prosecution was a transparently cynical attempt to deprive an important American political and social movement of its most effective leader. In that case, however, even the Alabama jury, composed exclusively of white men, perceived the abusive character of the case and returned an acquittal. Afterwards, Dr. King thanked the jury for their “fair, honest, and just verdict” and commended the Alabama judge for the “high and noble manner” in which he had conducted the case. If criticism of prosecutors and courts is permissible and necessary in certain circumstances, the only important question at present is whether such criticism is justified in the case of President Trump’s New York conviction. Would it be reasonable for impartial Americans today to echo Dr. King’s words and congratulate the Manhattan jury for a “fair” verdict and commend Judge Merchan for his “high and noble” handling of the case? For an answer to that question, we need not rely on Trump or his aggrieved supporters. We need only look to the evaluation of respected CNN legal analyst and former federal prosecutor Elie Honig, writing in New York Magazine: “Prosecutors Got Trump, But They Contorted the Law.” This article was made available by RealClearWire. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Americans Must Criticize Our Corrupt Courts appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Success in Classrooms