YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #police #law #racism #civilrights #ai #funny #fourthamendment #utah #cops #privacy #lawenforcement #warrant #environmentalscience #eff #block
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

AllSides - Balanced News
AllSides - Balanced News
1 y

Favicon 
www.allsides.com

USAID funded Ukraine group that smeared VP Vance as pro-Russia ‘propagandist’

The US government funded a Ukrainian military intelligence firm which smeared US Vice President JD Vance, US Counterterrorism Director Joe Kent, and Rep. Thomas Massie as “foreign propagandists of the Russian Federation.” To this day, the online blacklist published by the USAID-funded Ukrainian group, known as Molfar, lists Vance, Massie, and Kent as “foreign propagandists” aligned with the Russian government, and demands their “removal from public positions, the introduction...
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

The Beatles song George Harrison loved but John Lennon hated: ‘A song I never thought much of’
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

The Beatles song George Harrison loved but John Lennon hated: ‘A song I never thought much of’

"A sort of throwaway song of mine"
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Most Beautiful Architecture in El Salvador: A Local’s Guide (2025)
Favicon 
curiosspot.com

Most Beautiful Architecture in El Salvador: A Local’s Guide (2025)

El Salvador, Central America’s smallest country with 6.34 million people, showcases some of the region’s most beautiful architecture. The country’s architectural wonders span from ancient ruins dating back to 5000 BC to breathtaking modern structures. My experience as a local has shown how our architectural heritage combines historical significance with artistic brilliance. The Joya de Ceren Archeological Park, a UNESCO World Heritage site, has been home to civilizations since 1200 BC. The site stands among masterpieces like the neo-Gothic Santa Ana Cathedral and the distinctive Iglesia El Rosario, celebrated for its vibrant stained glass windows and abstract metalworks, all showcasing the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. This piece explores El Salvador’s most remarkable architectural landmarks. The historically rich National Palace features color-coded governmental rooms, while the symbolic Divine Savior of the World Monument stands as our nation’s pride. Our small country’s architecture continues to fascinate visitors worldwide through its colonial churches, modern buildings, and ancient ruins. Religious Architecture Highlights “Since 1971, El Rosario church is a religious heritage of Salvadorans as one of the last churches built in the capital, which retains a modern architectural design, enriched with European influence and unique to the continent.” — Xtreme Collections, Travel and culture content creator San Salvador’s religious buildings are proof of the country’s rich spiritual heritage. Traditional and avant-garde designs fascinate visitors and locals alike, showcasing the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. El Rosario Church Design Elements The remarkable Iglesia El Rosario, completed in 1971, broke away from traditional church architecture. Sculptor Rubén Martínez created the architectural plans in just six days. His design was so innovative that Pope John XXIII personally watched over parts of its construction. The church looks like a simple concrete structure from the outside, similar to an airplane hangar. However, the interior is a stunning example of the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. French-imported stained glass panels create a breathtaking rainbow effect, while the church’s unique “Stairway to Heaven” features a tiered, arched ceiling. Vibrant glass panels line this ceiling, bathing the altar and pews in brilliant colors. The builders completed this masterpiece with a modest budget of $260,000, showing remarkable resourcefulness. The structure has an innovative ventilation system and recycled iron sculptures throughout the Stations of the Cross. Central America’s highest isolated wall stands at the north end, housing the main altar. Metropolitan Cathedral Features The Metropolitan Cathedral of the Holy Savior became the principal church of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese after its completion in 1999. The cathedral’s unique look is different from typical Salvadoran colonial churches, making it a remarkable example of the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. This makes it the third building to serve as the Holy Savior’s cathedral. The main altar displays an extraordinary image of the Divine Savior of the World. Friar Francisco Silvestre García sculpted this piece in 1777. Holy Roman Emperor Charles V donated the original work in 1546. The image sits on a four-column baldacchino with statues of Moses and Elijah around it. Artistic elements fill the cathedral. Eight large paintings by Andrés García Ibáñez show Christ’s life. A bright Churrigueresque cupola tops the structure. The cathedral’s crypt holds Archbishop Óscar A Romero’s tomb, featuring Italian artist Paolo Borghi’s sculpture. This cathedral means more than just architectural beauty. Many historical events that shaped the nation happened here. Pope John Paul II visited twice and recognized the building’s deep connection to Salvadoran people’s hopes and dreams. Cultural Buildings Worth Visiting “Initially, this site supported the historic Parish Church of San Salvador, whose builder was the presbyter and hero of independence José Matías Delgado in the eighteenth century.” — Xtreme Collections, Travel and culture content creator El Salvador’s architectural masterpieces reflect its rich cultural heritage, each building telling a unique story of artistic progress and tradition, showcasing the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. National Theater Architecture The National Theater, inaugurated in 1917, is a stunning example of beautiful architecture in El Salvador, shows French Renaissance excellence with modern elements. French architect Daniel Beylard won the design competition among 12 international entries and created one of Central America’s most elegant performance venues. Italian architect Lucio Cappellaro decorated the theater’s Great Hall, which blends Versailles Style, Rococo, Romanticism, and Art Nouveau influences beautifully. Salvadoran architect Ricardo Jiménez Castillo led a major renovation in 1976 with local artists. Carlos Cañas created beautiful murals, including the 230-square-meter fresco “El mestizaje cultural” on the cupola. Japanese technology upgraded the theater’s sound and light systems in 1992, making it a premier cultural destination. Museums and Galleries The Museum of Art of El Salvador (MARTE), a 20-year old institution, showcases an impressive collection of Salvadoran art. MARTE’s location in Colonia San Benito allows it to refresh its semi-permanent exhibitions and temporary displays that give new viewpoints on local and international art movements. The museum works with prestigious institutions like Mexico’s Soumaya Museum and Costa Rica’s Museum of Contemporary Art and Design, all showcasing the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. The State Museum of Anthropology, built in 1962, showcases international modernism through its elegant design with hyperboloid concrete shell elements. This architectural gem perfectly balances form and function. Educational Institutions The University of San Salvador started its architecture faculty in 1954, which changed architectural education forever. Students learn to create spaces that meet human needs, from religious buildings to industrial facilities. Modern educational buildings now feature innovative designs with neurostimulating architecture, strategic color choices, and thoughtful decorations that boost learning. The Faculty of Informatics and Applied Sciences represents modern educational architecture at its best. Mac computers fill its specialized facilities, including the Multimedia Technology and Animation lab. These spaces give students ground experience in architecture and design. Best Places to See Modern Design El Salvador’s urban skyline shows a beautiful mix of modern architecture against its historic buildings. San Salvador Skyscrapers The Millennium Tower dominates the capital’s skyline with its 24 floors. Torre El Pedregal stands proud at 361.9 feet, reaching 28 stories in Antiguo Cuscatlán. The city keeps growing taller, especially when you have the government’s new tax breaks for high-rise buildings. San Salvador Centro and La Libertad Este will soon see at least five investors building projects over 35 floors. These new buildings will help house the growing urban population and solve the lack of land. Contemporary Shopping Centers The retail sector is worth USD 4.50 billion and boasts amazing modern shopping spots. Multiplaza leads the pack with its international brands and high-end boutiques. La Gran Vía adds to this mix by blending modern design with huge retail spaces. Presidente Plaza brings fresh modern style with its trendy boutiques. Next door, Bambu City Center mixes fashion stores with local artisan shops. Plaza Futura sits in the World Trade Center complex. It covers 3,000 square meters with 25 stores and gives shoppers amazing views of San Salvador. New Residential Developments Apartment tower projects will push the construction sector up by 18%. The metropolitan area has 40 housing projects running now, and 60 more are coming up across the country. Builders are moving into new areas like Zaragoza and Soyapango to create cheaper housing options. Some standout residential projects include: Casa 159: El Salvador’s first building with seismic isolators Trè Lum: A 14-floor tower with 70 apartments Torre Humana: The newest addition to Avante projects Vertical housing leads the residential market’s changes. Private projects will bring in USD 600.00 to USD 700.00 million. Projects worth USD 1.00 billion have gotten the green light, and this is a big deal as it means that USD 4.00 billion more in projects are being reviewed. Planning Your Architecture Tour The right timing will give you the best experience while learning about the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. Here are some insider tips to help you plan an exceptional architectural tour Best Times to Visit Buildings The dry season between November and April gives you ideal conditions to see the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. January and February are perfect with sunny days and lower humidity. Tourist activity peaks during March and April because of Easter celebrations, but the heat can be uncomfortable. Photographers who want dramatic lighting should shoot early morning or late afternoon to create stunning effects on building facades. November is a great time since crowds are smaller and the weather stays pleasant. Photography Tips You need thoughtful techniques to capture El Salvador’s architectural beauty. Soft, even morning light brings out intricate building details. The midday sun creates dramatic effects as it streams through skylights. To get the best shots: Skip the tripod to move quickly between angles Use vari-angle screens in crowded spaces Watch how light moves around buildings all day Try different weather conditions for unique moods Getting Around Efficiently Your needs and budget will determine your transportation options. Bilingual guides provide tailored tours that cost $35 per person. These include air-conditioned vehicles and pickup services, making it easier to explore the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. Budget travelers can use local busses that connect major architectural sites for 50 cents within cities. Bus travel between towns costs $2-5. Shared minivans are more comfortable and cost about $10 per trip. A private driver is great for full-day trips, especially when visiting multiple sites. You’ll get flexibility and comfort, plus drivers who know the best photo spots and timing. Scheduled transportation services help you reach locations reliably for night photography or early morning shoots. Conclusion El Salvador’s buildings tell a fascinating story of our nation’s progress, stretching from ancient ruins to modern skyscrapers. Religious landmarks like El Rosario Church show how artistic innovation and spiritual meaning come together beautifully. The National Theater stands as evidence of our rich artistic heritage, and new developments point to our country’s bold future, all showcasing the beautiful architecture in El Salvador. I’ve spent years getting to know these architectural wonders, and each building has its own story to share. El Rosario Church’s rainbow-colored interior surprises visitors, while the State Museum of Anthropology’s elegant design creates an unexpected experience. These spaces challenge what people think they know about architecture. The dry season is the perfect time to see these architectural masterpieces. Our small country packs as much architectural variety as many larger nations. Old historical buildings stand next to bold new structures, creating a striking contrast that attracts architecture lovers worldwide. Want to learn more about El Salvador’s hidden architectural treasures and other amazing spots in Central America? Subscribe to Curiosspot history blog. Let’s keep learning about the remarkable buildings that make our country one of a kind. Explore Similar Architectural Wonders If you love discovering historical and architectural marvels, check out these fascinating articles: Mohenjo Daro & Harappa: Ancient Indus Valley Cities Traditional Islamic Architecture: A Legacy of Craftsmanship Lahore Fort: A Timeless Mughal Masterpiece Historic Places in Sacramento California Guide to Cancun Mayan Ruins Excursions The Mystery of the Barabar Caves Meroe: Sudan’s Ancient Lost City of The Sands FAQs Q1. What is the most iconic architectural landmark in El Salvador? The Monumento al Divino Salvador del Mundo (Monument to the Divine Savior of the World) is considered the most iconic architectural landmark in El Salvador. Located in San Salvador, this monument was inaugurated in 1942 and serves as a symbol of the country’s patron saint, Jesus Christ. Q2. When is the best time to visit El Salvador for architectural tours? The best time to visit El Salvador for architectural tours is during the dry season, from November to April. January and February are particularly ideal, offering sunny days with lower humidity. These months provide excellent conditions for exploring and photographing the country’s architectural wonders. Q3. What unique features does El Rosario Church in San Salvador have? El Rosario Church in San Salvador is known for its innovative design. From the outside, it resembles a concrete airplane hangar, but the interior features a stunning rainbow effect created by French-imported stained glass panels. The church also has a distinctive “Stairway to Heaven” with a tiered, arched ceiling lined with vibrant glass panels. Q4. Are there any modern architectural developments in El Salvador? Yes, El Salvador is experiencing significant modern architectural developments, especially in San Salvador. The capital’s skyline is evolving with new skyscrapers, such as the Millennium Tower. Additionally, there’s a growing trend in vertical housing, with numerous apartment tower projects under development across the metropolitan area. Q5. What transportation options are available for architectural tours in El Salvador? There are various transportation options for architectural tours in El Salvador. These include private tours with bilingual guides and air-conditioned vehicles, local busses for budget travelers, and shared minivans for a balance of comfort and affordability. For flexibility and convenience, hiring a private driver for full-day exploration is also a popular choice among visitors.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Right-Wing Feminists Thrown Out of Paris Women’s Day Demonstration
Favicon 
www.infowars.com

Right-Wing Feminists Thrown Out of Paris Women’s Day Demonstration

Left-wing feminists have decided they are the only ones with the right to defend the cause of women.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Brian Mock joins Mike Adams to give the latest breaking news on what’s happening with the j6 political prisoners and the US Federal Government
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Brian Mock joins Mike Adams to give the latest breaking news on what’s happening with the j6 political prisoners and the US Federal Government

from Health Ranger Report:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Why Were the Texas Rangers Formed?
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Why Were the Texas Rangers Formed?

  Texas occupies a unique position in American history. Besides being the only nation-turned-state, Texas officially founded one of the oldest American law enforcement agencies in 1835, the Texas Rangers. Their first role involved protecting settlers against Native American tribes. That role would later expand.   Who Founded the Rangers? Comanche Territory and Raids 1830s Source: Texas Beyond History   Americans first came to Texas in the early 1820s, founding settlements with Spanish and then Mexican government permission. Moses Austin and his son Stephen F. Austin formed their town, numbering 300 families. Stephen organized about a dozen men, calling them Rangers as protection from Native American tribes. Later, as more people emigrated to Texas and more settlements formed, they created the Texas Rangers.   Austin’s creation of the Rangers showed foresight. In 1826, rising tensions and clashes with a local tribe boiled over. Sick of the murders and raids, American settlers with Rangers attacked the Karankawa people along the Colorado River, killing upwards of 50. The Rangers faced off against their greatest foe, the Comanche tribe, in a few short years. Their clashes and struggles would last for the next fifty years.   What Made Up the Ranger’s Organization? Texas Ranger 1st Regiment Source: Library of Congress   The Rangers grew from that small band into a more organized group as more Americans came to Texas. Operating like a militia, they organized into companies. Led by either a captain or lieutenant, these frontiersmen were rugged. Each knew how to survive, fight, and ride well. At first, each man needed to provide their mounts and weapons. The salary was $1.25 a day.   As American settlements grew, so did the need for the Rangers. From that protection role, the Rangers patrolled the fringes, pursuing criminals and keeping order. After the 1835-1836 Texas Revolution, the Rangers, based in Austin, answered to the Secretary of War. This arrangement helped the Rangers get additional resources.   Where Did the Rangers Fight in the Mexican-American War? Comanche War Party 1830s Source: Smithsonian American Art Museum   During the Mexican-American War of 1846-1848, the Rangers fought outside of Texas. They fought as part of the U.S. Army and as a regiment. The Rangers fought in several important battles – the Buena Vista and Monterrey Battles.    In this role, the Rangers carried out fast raids and reconnaissance, skillfully finding their way. They fought hard but sometimes brutally. Both sides executed or tortured prisoners, the Rangers being no exception. The Mexican soldiers nicknamed the Rangers the “Los Diablos Tejanos” or Texas Devils. The Rangers returned to their original role when the War ended.   Who Were the Rangers’ Greatest Opponents? Sharps Carbine with Ladder Sight Source: Wikipedia   Until their defeat in the 1870s, the Comanches emerged as the Rangers’ greatest foe. Considered among the most formidable American tribes, the Comanche won battles but not the war. The Comanche were expert horsemen with strong leadership and unmatched knowledge of the terrain. They also formed solid alliances with other Texas tribes.   Their first great clash came at the 1840 Battle of Plum Creek. This fight came at the end of the Comanche’s Great 1840 Raid, which struck deep with much destruction. Both sides fought to a standstill. While not defeated, the Ranger inflicted bloody nose meant no more great raids.   What Famous Outlaws and Gangs Did the Texas Rangers Chase? 1920s Silent Movie About the Rangers Source: American Film Institute   By 1874, the Rangers (and U.S. Army) inflicted final defeats on the Native Tribes. Forced to Oklahoma, the tribes ceased to be a problem. But replacing them came the rush of pioneers as settlements appeared overnight. The Rangers morphed into a law enforcement unit. They reorganized to enforce these laws, which coincided with a tremendous rise in outlaws and bandit gangs.   Outlaws like John Wesley Hardin fell to the Rangers in 1877. A Texan by birth, Hardin’s kill count allegedly reached 21 by his capture. Besides murder, he also committed cattle rustling and robbery. Besides outlaws, the Rangers also stepped into end feuds. The 1875 Mason County War resulted from flagrant cattle rustling. German-born settlers soon had enough. Lynchings, murders, and vigilante gangs appeared as both sides retaliated. The Rangers got involved, mostly settling the feud, but not before 12 men died.    The Rangers ended the Sam Bass Gang in 1878. This notorious gang specialized in train robberies. One heist netted them $60,000 in new gold coins in 1877. The Rangers cornered Bass’s gang at Round Rock, Texas, on July 19, 1878, after robbing four Dallas area trains. Bass perished in the shootout.   Why Were the Texas Rangers Considered Controversial?   The Rangers’ history is one of hard-won success but not without debate. Violence in the Old West occurred frequently but sometimes blew up. Tejanos, or Mexican descendants, had multiple bad encounters with the Rangers, the worst being the 1918 Porvenir Massacre of 15 men and boys.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

What Is Australia’s Day of Mourning?
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

What Is Australia’s Day of Mourning?

  The 1938 Day of Mourning was a turning point in the history of Australia and Aboriginal activism. It showed white Australians that Aboriginal people, far from being members of an uneducated, “uncivilized” and doomed race, were well aware of their rights and their history. It showed them that they had the means to campaign against the racist measures employed by white-led institutions, first and foremost the New South Wales Aborigines Protection Board. Most importantly, The Day of Mourning became possible when men and women from various Aboriginal groups in New South Wales and Victoria united to voice their demands.   The Men and Women Behind the Day of Mourning Aboriginal rights activists Tom Foster, Jack Kinchela, Douglas Nicholls, William Cooper, and John Patten during the Day of Mourning in Sydney, 1938. Source: National Museum of Australia   Jack Patten, Pearl Gibbs, William Ferguson, Herbert Stanley “Bert” Groves, and William Cooper are the names that will forever be associated with the 1938 Day of Mourning. Except for William Cooper, they were all born and bred in New South Wales.   Jack Patten (1905-1957) was a Yorta Yorta man born at Cummeragunja Mission, just across the Murray River. “Aunty” Pearl Gibbs (1901-1983) was born in La Perouse, New South Wales, to a mother with Ngemba ancestry and a white father. William “Bill” Ferguson (1882-1950) came from Waddai, Darlington Point, and he was the son of an Aboriginal woman and a Scottish shearer. Herbert Groves (1907-1970) was a Kamilaroi man from the Walhallow (Caroona) Aboriginal station near Quirindi. William Cooper (1861-1941), the eldest in the group, belonged to the Yorta Yorta people but was born in Victoria, at the intersection of the Goulburn and Murray rivers.   Aboriginal girl at the Australian Aborigines’ Mission in La Pérouse, New South Wales, 1910. Source: National Library of Australia   They all shared a common goal of dismantling the New South Wales Aborigines Protection Board, which imposed racist and discriminatory measures to control the lives of Aboriginal people.   Groves was a young man working as a handyman on the Bulgandramine Aboriginal reserve for the Protection Board when he met Ferguson, who was actively campaigning against the Board at the time.   Patten began his activism in the boxing ring under the name “Ironbark.” While on tour, he witnessed the poor living conditions endured by Aboriginal people at the Clarence River Aboriginal Settlement, where he also met his wife, Selina Avery. The local school denied admission to the community’s children based on their ancestry, just like Patten had been excluded from the Navy on purely racial grounds.   When and Where John Patten (right) reads the Day of Mourning Resolution in Sydney. Source: Museum of Contemporary Art   In 1937, Patten, Ferguson, and Cooper established the Aborigines Progressive Association (APA), with Patten as president. Less than a year later, on January 26, 1938, they organized the first Day of Mourning. As 120 motorized floats paraded through the streets of Sydney to celebrate the sesquicentenary of European settlement, a group of around 100 Aboriginal men, women, and children gathered at the Australian Hall, a popular venue for concerts at 150-152 Elizabeth Street, now owned by the Metropolitical Local Aboriginal Land Council. Around 1,000 supporters marched through the streets of Sydney wearing black.   It was the first time that Aboriginal people had organized themselves on a national level, with activists coming from different states, to protest the dispossession and discrimination they had experienced since 1788. They renamed January 26 a “Day of Mourning.”   Aboriginal people at the Coranderrk mission, Source: National Museum of Australia   In 1938, the Day of Mourning represented the culmination of years of meetings and petitions organized by the Aborigines Progressive Association (APA) and the Australian Aborigines League (AAL), which had been established by William Cooper in 1932. The Day of Mourning was, first and foremost, a chance to call attention to Aboriginal rights and the need for practical political changes.   It was also the moment when Aboriginal people could come together and mourn the loss of their lands, the attempt to erase their culture, and the colonial attack on their languages and their children, who, in 1938, were systematically being removed from their families and placed in missions, reserves, and stations (also called “managed reserves”), often far away from their country. Here managers and church officials could “save” them and turn them into “white” children with a British education.   William Ferguson (third from left) and Herbert Groves (first from left) at a committee meeting of the Australian Aborigines’ League Group. Source: AIATSIS   From 1940, the Day of Mourning became known as “Aborigines Day.” Every year, on the Sunday before Australia Day, Aboriginal organizations gathered to remind white Australians of their role and the role of their ancestors in the building of the nation. In 1955, the Day of Mourning was moved to the first Sunday in July and from a day of protests, it turned into a day of celebration of Aboriginal culture.   In 1974, from a day of celebration of Aboriginal culture, Aborigines Day became a week of celebration, after the formation of the National Aborigines Day Observance Committee (NADOC).  It usually takes place from the first to the second Sunday in July. In 1991, NADOC became known as NAIDOC, National Aborigines and Islanders Day Observance Committee, in an effort to include and acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.   The Importance of January 26 Painting celebrating the famous picture of William Ferguson, Jack Kinchela, Isaac Ingram, Doris Williams, Esther Ingram, Arthur Williams, Philip Ingram, Louis Agnes Ingram holding her daughter Olive, and Jack Patten, 1997. Source: Museum of Contemporary Art, Australia   On January 26, 1938, non-Indigenous Australians gathered in Sydney to celebrate the birth of Australia, that is, the 150 years since Captain Arthur Philip (1738-1814) landed at Sydney Cove in present-day New South Wales on January 26, 1788.   Organizers had pressured Aboriginal people living in Sydney to participate in the celebration. When they staunchly refused, the organizers turned to a group of Aboriginal men from western New South Wales and made them travel to Sydney. Here, as part of the celebrations, they had them wear what they considered “traditional” Aboriginal clothes and run up the beach away from the British in a grotesque re-enactment of Philip’s landing at Farm Cove. It didn’t matter that this is not how the Eora, the Traditional Custodians of the south-east foreshore of Australia, had reacted to the British invasion. This was how white Australia in the late 1930s was determined to see Aboriginal people.   Aboriginal men from western New South Wales were brought to Sydney to re-enact Captain Philip’s landing at Farm Cove. Source: National Museum of Australia   The first European settlement dates back to 1788. Aboriginal people didn’t simply run away, nor did they give up their lands, as colonial propaganda has conveniently portrayed them for centuries. It took colonists 50 years to fully penetrate and settle the Australian continent — 50 years of clashes and escalating violence between the settlers, who soon started to build huts, grow crops, and import livestock. Aboriginal groups witnessed imported weeds and cattle scour their native grasses and bush food.   On January 26, 1938, the Aboriginal men and women gathering at the Australian Hall and on the streets of Sydney protested not only the discrimination and dispossession they had been experiencing since 1788 but also the Western, non-Indigenous take on history that white Australia was imposing on them and their descendants. The 1938 Day of Mourning was about the present as much as it was about the past.   Just the Beginning Aboriginal Land Rights Demonstration at Parliament House, Canberra on July 30, 1972, 1972, photograph by Ken Middleton. Source: National Museum of Australia   The Day of Mourning was also the beginning of Aboriginal activism. In 1939, Jack Patten led what is now known as the Cummeragunja Walk-Off to protest the poor management of the mission where he was born. 27 years later, Gurindji man Vincent Lingiari led 200 other domestic workers and stockmen with their families to walk off the Vesteys’s cattle station at Wave Hill in the Northern Territory. The strike lasted seven years and is now known as the Wave Hill Walk-Off.   The 1960s saw the emergence of the Aboriginal Lands Rights Movement. In March 1963 the government announced the granting of mining leases for bauxite mining in an area of over 300 square kilometers (115 square miles) of land excised from the Aboriginal reserve of the Yolngu people, who had been living in Yirrkala, in the Gove peninsula in north-east Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory, from time immemorial. The community elders were not consulted.   Silas Roberts (left) and Galarrwuy Yunupingu holding the Yirrkala bark petitions at Parliament House in Canberra, 1976. Source: National Museum of Australia   The Yolngu people requested an inquiry and presented the Australian Parliament with the so-called Yirrkala Petition. Yolngu artists typed it up and placed it on bark sheets before painting the sheets’ borders with stories of their moieties Dhuwa and Yirritja.   The fact that the petition was first written in Yolngu Matha, and then later translated into English, makes it unique. It was also the first Aboriginal petition and the first document written in an Aboriginal language to be officially recognized by the Commonwealth government. Eventually, the Select Committee on Grievances of Yirrkala Aborigines, Arnhem Land Reserve issued a report recommending that Yolngu sacred sites be protected, and compensation paid to them. 25 years later, the 1988 Barunga Statement, presented to then-President Bob Hawke, was placed on a sheet of composite wood too, and its sides were painted by Yolngu, Arrernte, and Warlpiri artists from central Australia.   Vincent Lingiari, the Gurindji man behind the Wave Hill Walk-Off, here standing beside a plaque marking the handing over of the lease in Wattie Creek, 1975. Source: National Museum of Australia   The Yirrkala and Barunga bark petitions, the success of the 1967 Referendum, the massive protests that accompanied the 1988 Australian Bicentenary, the groundbreaking Mabo Case in 1992, the Wik Peoples v Queensland in 1996, as well as the Griffiths v Northern Territory case (hailed as one of the most significant cases since the Wik and Mabo cases) all have their roots in the determination of the men, women, and children behind the 1938 Day of Mourning, those who organized it, those who took part in it, and those who ensured its success.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

The Rise and Fall of the Byzantine Empire’s Macedonian Renaissance
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

The Rise and Fall of the Byzantine Empire’s Macedonian Renaissance

  The Byzantine Empire in the 7th century was wrecked by military strife. The empire was halved, with its richest territories in Egypt, North Africa, and the Levant lost to the expanding Islamic Caliphate. However, the empire not only survived its losses but had a resurgence in the 9th to 11th centuries, with a revival of classical Hellenic art and literature that coincided with the reconquest of nearly half of its lost territories. This had an irreversible impact on Byzantine culture and society, as the definition of “Roman” would go through an evolution during the Macedonian Renaissance.   The State of the Byzantine Empire During the Dark Ages  Emperor Justinian and members of his court, 6th century. Source: The Metropolitan Museum of Art   The Byzantine Empire during the late 6th to late 7th centuries was in decline. Following the reconquest of the Western provinces of Italy and North Africa under Justinian the Great, the empire was left financially exhausted and also militarily overextended. Coupled with the constant war in the east with the Sassanid Dynasty of Iran, the empire was in a weak position by the end of Justinian’s reign. In addition to the Plague of Justinian from 541-549 CE which killed 20%-40% of Constantinople’s population, the empire was left in material ruins by the dawn of the 7th century.   The production of buildings and literature reached a low in the empire during this period, as the emperors had neither the resources nor time to patronize the arts like in previous centuries. As a result of the weakness of the Byzantines, the rising Islamic Caliphate had conquered rich Roman provinces from the Levant to North Africa by 647 CE. The situation in Italy was equally grim, as the Lombards took over half the Peninsula, permanently weakening the Byzantine presence there.   Byzantine Medallion, depicting Christ, 1100 CE. Source: The Metropolitan Museum of Art   The empire was also struggling with religious tensions. The Iconoclasm Dispute which divided the empire on a theological level began due to different interpretations of the Ten Commandments, with the iconoclasts believing that all religious images and icons went against the correct doctrine. Starting in 726 CE under Emperor Leo III, state-sanctioned iconoclasm—meaning the “breaking of icons”—occurred until 787 CE. A second period of iconoclasm happened between 814 and 842 CE.   Aside from the vast loss of art and icons, the theological dispute split the empire in half, as the papacy in Rome opposed the doctrine throughout both Iconoclast periods. This further weakened the Byzantine position in Italy, as by 752 CE the popes no longer sought imperial recognition from Constantinople. This would be the first of many breakdowns in relations between the Eastern and Western Churches.   Revival of Learning and the Arts Iconoclasts whitewashing an image of Christ, from the Khludoff Psalter, 9th century. Source: Wikimedia Commons   The Iconoclasm dispute and the Macedonian Renaissance are two seemingly polar opposite events that are more intertwined than what meets the eye. The Iconoclasm dispute was a struggle against the reliance on monastic art to venerate religious figures, and despite its ultimate failure, it did succeed in opening up Byzantine art and culture to different influences and traditions.   “Iconoclasm had also challenged the monastic domination of culture, which had been a feature of the seventh century. The level of education rose; secular learning was cultivated for its own sake and there was a recovery of many aspects of classical culture” (Angold 96).   As a result, the 9th and 10th centuries saw a revival of art and literature. This was reflected in a new Greek writing style called the minuscule hand, which featured smaller and more connected letters that made reading more accessible and books cheaper.   Most of the scholars of the early Macedonian Renaissance were civil servants and part of the imperial hierarchy. During this era, the emperors recruited many scholars as civil servants through patronage. A prominent example is Leo the Mathematician, one of the greatest scientists in Byzantine history. He is credited with creating a beacon system in Anatolia, which was a series of nine towers that stretched over 720 km (447 miles). If a raid occurred, a bonfire was lit to alert the emperor of any incoming Arab raids within the hour. In addition, a series of synchronized clocks were implemented in each tower, as different messages could be conveyed by the timing of when the fire was lit.   David Composing the Psalms, from the Paris Psalter, c. 900 C.E. Source: BnF   Aside from creative inventions like the beaconing system, the Byzantines also looked toward the past. A feature of the Macedonian Renaissance was the departure from Late Roman art forms and the revival of Hellenistic styles. Byzantine artists during this era blended Hellenistic art with religion, as they depicted Christian scenes and Biblical references through Classical Art. The Paris Psalter manuscript is one prominent example.   The Economic and Military Revival  Monomachos Crown, 11th century. Source: Wikimedia Commons   With the revival of art and learning well underway by the late 9th century, the empire entered a military and economic golden age during the Macedonian Dynasty. The first ruler of this dynasty was Basil I, a poor peasant from Macedonia who rose up the imperial hierarchy and eventually became emperor of the Romans in 867 CE. Under subsequent emperors, the empire managed to make advances against the weakening Abbasid Caliphate.   In 961 CE and 967 CE, respectively, the Byzantines reconquered Crete and Cyprus which reaffirmed Byzantine naval superiority in the Aegean Sea, and in 965 CE, Cilicia in Anatolia was also retaken from the Arabs. The most impressive series of reconquests came during the reign of Basil II (976 CE-1025 CE), as he destroyed the Bulgarian Empire in 1018 CE and absorbed the entire state into the empire.   During this era, the empire saw its last resurgence in Italy after Otto II of the Holy Roman Empire failed to conquer the south in 982 CE. As a result, a temporary peace ensued in the region. This was followed by an alliance with Venice that traded lower tariffs for naval support in Italy.   Coin of Basil II, 960-1125. Source: The British Museum   The expansion of the empire’s territorial possessions also increased its tax base and the amount of resources it had. For example, Basil II left the treasury with a surplus of 14,400,000 nomismata and an annual income of 5,900,000 nomismata by 1025 CE, in comparison to an annual revenue of 2,900,000 nomismata right before the reign of Basil I.   The Byzantine Emperors depended on the urban bureaucracy for vital functions such as tax collection and balancing accounts, and the rise of literacy during the Macedonian Renaissance no doubt enlarged the pool of talent that the empire could draw from. As a result, it is no coincidence that the greatest economic and military successes of the Macedonian Dynasty came during the late 10th century when the intellectual revival of the empire had already been ongoing for more than 50 years.   Change in National Identity  Goblet with Personifications of Cyprus, Rome, Constantinople, and Alexandria, 8th century. Source: The Metropolitan Museum of Art   The Byzantine Empire was in a very different position by the end of the Macedonian Renaissance than it was in the 7th and 8th centuries. Although the empire was in military and economic decline during the two centuries of the Islamic Conquests, it still had an undisputed claim as the sole Roman Empire. The empire was still a largely multiethnic state, holding pockets of land in Italy, Spain, Greece, and North Africa.   By the 10th century, the empire was a largely homogenous state of Greeks under the name of “Roman.” As a result, the Roman identity shifted to a more narrow term that only encompassed somebody who was raised speaking Greek and was an Orthodox Christian living in the Byzantine Empire. The empire still had minority populations, but as long as they assimilated into the cultural norm of the empire, they could be recognized as Romans.   “Overall, Romania (Byzantium) looked more like a Roman Kingdom that had minorities than a true multiethnic empire, though in the later tenth and eleventh centuries, the balance would shift toward imperial rule over recently conquered or annexed foreign territories. Still, the boundaries between Roman and barbarian were never as stark as our sources suggest” (Kaldellis, 2).   Basil I, and his son Leo, 13th century. Source: National Library of Spain   This is reflected in the perception of the Byzantine Empire by other states and peoples during the Macedonian Renaissance. For example, the coronation of Charlemagne in 800 CE as emperor of the Western Roman Empire caused the Latin West to view the Byzantines as Greeks, whose rulers in Constantinople were not emperors of the Romans but the emperors/kings of the Greeks. The Macedonian Renaissance also had a hand in this perception. Although citizens during this era considered themselves Roman, the revival of literature and art was directly inspired by ancient Greece.   Laws and codes were still written in the Hellenistic Koine Greek despite the spoken form of Greek being far evolved by the 10th century. Consequently, the Macedonian Renaissance was also the first period in Byzantine history that the empire consciously drew on its Hellenic heritage for literary and artistic inspiration.   The Impact of the Macedonian Renaissance The Byzantine Empire in 1025, under the Macedonian Dynasty. Source: Wikimedia Commons   The Macedonian Renaissance was a fascinating period in Byzantine History that has multiple meanings. A rebirth in Hellenic art and literature? A revival in the military and economic fortunes of the empire? All of these things are interconnected, and the result was a period of rapid change in Byzantine identity from the 10th to 11th centuries.   Rather than the wide-reaching Roman Empire of the ancient era, the medieval Byzantines were limited to a predominately Hellenic sphere of territories. This had an irreversible impact on the definition of “Roman,” which became far more specific to Hellenized citizens of the reduced Roman Empire.   Despite the changes in identity and culture, the empire reached its largest extent since the 6th century. Although its economic and military golden age would not last long after Basil II, the revival of learning and literature during the Macedonian Renaissance would continue for centuries longer.   Bibliography   Angold, M.J. (2001). Byzantium: the Bridge from Antiquity to the Middle Ages.  Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Kaldellis, A. (2017). Streams of Gold, Rivers of Blood: The Rise and Fall of Byzantium, 955  A.D. to the First Crusade. Oxford University Press. Treadgold, W. T. (1979). The Revival of Byzantine Learning and the Revival of the Byzantine State. The American Historical Review, 84(5), 1245–1266. https://doi.org/10.2307/1861467
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

All the Governments in Exile in WWII (and Where They Went)
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

All the Governments in Exile in WWII (and Where They Went)

  The term “government in exile” describes political parties that claim themselves as the legitimate government of an independent, sovereign state but cannot carry out their duties due to instability, conflict, or foreign occupation. The local government is compelled to move to a secure location.   During World War II, the majority of the European governments of the nations under occupation went into exile in London, England. For this reason, London acquired the characterization of “Miniature Europe.” Read on for an overview of all those WWII governments in exile.   1. Free France General De Gaulle inspecting sailors on the Free French ship Leopard photographed by Reginald George Guy Coote. Source: Imperial War Museums   Nazi Germany invaded France on May 10, 1940. On June 16, 1940, Marshal Henri Philippe Pétain was appointed prime minister of France. On June 17, he informed Nazi Germany about the French surrender. Paris, as well, fell. Soon thereafter, Marshal Pétain established a German puppet state known as Vichy France. The same day, Charles de Gaulle, who had a minor position in the French government, decided to fight for French independence. He left Paris for London, intending to form the French government in exile.   During this time, de Gaulle had been undersecretary in the French government for only 12 days and was not as prominent on the international stage as Marshal Pétain. De Gaulle named the French government in exile Free France, claiming it to be the one and only legitimate government.   Already on June 18, despite the opposition from Britain’s cabinet, Prime Minister Winston Churchill allowed de Gaulle to deliver a five-minute speech on BBC radio.   “Whatever happens, the flame of the French resistance must not be extinguished and will not be extinguished,” de Gaulle declared, calling for Frenchmen to join the newly established Free French Forces.   Crowds of French patriots line the Champs Elysees to view Allied tanks and halftracks pass through the Arc du Triomphe after Paris was liberated on August 25, 1944. Source: Library of Congress   The primary goal of the Free French Forces, led by General de Gaulle, was to seize control of the North African territory by fighting both the forces of Vichy France and the Axis powers. In an effort to assert control over the French possessions in central Africa, Asia, and Oceania, Charles de Gaulle founded the French National Committee on October 27, 1940. At first, it was known as the Empire Defense Council.   The French Liberation Army (AFL) was founded on August 1, 1943, when the Army of Africa and the Free French Forces merged. De Gaulle’s government in exile was able to assemble almost 500,000 conscripts in the AFL in only three years. AFL successfully participated in the liberation of Paris in August 1944 and all subsequent Allied war efforts.   Just months before the end of World War II, in June 1944, on the territory of liberated France, de Gaulle proclaimed the establishment of the Provisional Government of the French Republic. This marked the transition of de Gaulle’s government in exile to Free France’s formal authority on French territory. Charles de Gaulle was greeted as a national hero in France for his wartime efforts. On November 13, 1945, the assembly unanimously elected Charles de Gaulle as head of the French government.   2. Polish Government in Exile Adolf Hitler receives a parade of German troops at Aleje Ujazdowskie in Warsaw, October 5, 1939. Source: National World War II Museum, New Orleans   The idea of forming the Polish government in exile was born when Nazi Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939. Soon, on September 17, the Soviet Union’s invasion of Eastern Poland followed. Polish officials initially established a government in exile in Paris, France, in an effort to protect Poland’s integrity and sovereignty.   Władysław Raczkiewicz served as president, while Władysław Sikorski assumed the roles of commander-in-chief and prime minister. The Polish government was compelled to move to London in the wake of the Nazi invasion of France in June 1940, with the primary goal of gaining support and recognition from key players in international affairs.   The Polish armed forces—land, air, and naval—participated extensively in the military activities of Allied forces. Throughout the war years, Polish intelligence operations proved extremely beneficial. Assisting the Allied forces to break the Enigma code, widely utilized by Nazi Germany, proved crucial in learning about Germany’s covert military schemes.   The Polish government in exile also coordinated the Polish resistance movement (Polish Home Army) within the occupied homeland.   The Polish government in exile played a significant role in bringing attention to the horrors of the Holocaust, including the systematic elimination of Jews and the mass murder of several Polish ethnic groups by Nazi Germany in German-occupied Poland. Utilizing the press, mass media, and diplomatic connections, the government released a number of periodicals, including the Polish Fortnightly Review, which provided early and detailed accounts of Auschwitz, a Nazi-established concentration camp in occupied Poland.   The British media, primarily the BBC, assisted the Polish government in exile in distributing these in-depth accounts to the general public. By 1944, the international society was well aware of the mass killing of ethnic minorities in occupied Poland.   The Polish Government in Exile, November 6, 1989. Source: Janusz Buda, Waseda University   The Polish government’s actions in exile were undermined during high-level conferences held in Tehran (December 1943), Yalta (February 1945), and Potsdam (June–July 1945), where the Big Three—US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Soviet Leader Joseph Stalin, and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill—discussed the post-war arrangement of the international order.   By the time of the Yalta Conference in February 1945, the Soviet Union had already occupied large parts of Poland. Stalin demanded to install the Soviet-friendly government in Poland, which would discredit the Polish government in exile. Roosevelt and Churchill, aiming to preserve the balance of power against Nazi Germany and Japan, sought to maintain the Soviet engagement in war efforts in Europe and Asia. Thus, they were willing to compromise and make concessions at the expense of smaller nations, such as Poland. Thus, the dreams of Poland becoming an independent and sovereign nation were crushed at the Yalta Conference, where the Soviet Union acquired control over Poland without the Polish government in exile being able to participate in the negotiation processes.   This marked the start of the decline of the activities of the Polish government in exile. Even though it remained in London until the dissolution of the Soviet Union, its function was limited due to a lack of international recognition. After the war, the Polish government in exile tried to keep the idea of an independent, sovereign Poland alive by cooperating with Polish émigré communities in Great Britain, preserving the Polish language and culture within these communities, as well as raising awareness of the Polish history of occupation.   The Polish government in exile was ultimately dissolved in 1990 when the first free elections were held in Poland.   3. Norway’s Government in Exile From one of the Norwegian squadrons in Great Britain. The map is studied before a cruise over France. Source: National Archives of Norway   Norway had proclaimed its neutrality during World War I and hoped to maintain it during World War II as well. It succeeded until Nazi Germany invaded Norwegian territories on April 9, 1940. Sailing into the Oslofjord port, German cruisers were ordered to capture King Haakon VII, royal family members, and the representatives of the government, hoping for an easy and rapid capitulation.   Despite initial refusal to leave Oslo, on June 7, King Haakon VII and his family, along with Johan Nygaardsvold’s government, fled to London, where they established the Norwegian government in exile at Kingston House North, Princes Gate. In the king’s view, preserving constitutional authority was essential to restoring Norwegian independence and sovereignty.   Like Charles de Gaulle, the leader of Free France, the Norwegian king inspired his country by broadcasting on British BBC radio. On July 8, 1940, King Haakon gave a public address defying Reich Commissioner Josef Terboven’s demands for his abdication to establish a legitimate Nazi administration in occupied Norway. By the end of September, Nazi Germany had given up on the idea of forming a legitimate administration. Rather, they imposed censorship on any expression of support or allegiance to the royal family and outlawed all political organizations except for the Norwegian National Socialist Party.   The king returns to Norway, June 7, 1945. Source: The Royal House of Norway   Throughout the five years of Nazi occupation, the royal family and Johan Nygaardsvold’s government advocated for Norway’s independence by supporting the Home Front, a local resistance movement. On June 20, 1944, Crown Prince Olav was appointed commander of defense, leading the Norwegian armed forces to support the Allies.   On May 8, 1945, Nazi forces withdrew from Norway following Germany’s surrender. On May 30, 1945, Prime Minister Johan Nygaardsvold and his administration returned to Oslo. The royal family arrived on June 7, exactly five years after the beginning of Norway’s occupation.   4. Belgium’s Government in Exile: The Pierlot IV Government The first German troops enter Belgium. August 1914. Source: Hodder Education Magazines   The Nazi invasion of Belgium on May 10, 1940, led to the formation of the Belgian government in exile, initially based in Bordeaux, France. In occupied Belgium, Nazi Germany installed a military administration.   After France fell to Nazi forces in June 1940, the Belgian government, led by Prime Minister Hubert Pierlot, was compelled to flee to London. In October 1940, the prime minister declared his government, widely referred to as the Pierlot IV Government, the only legitimate representative of occupied Belgium.   Not able to function on Belgian territory, it was the government in exile in London that governed the mineral-rich Belgian Congo and from there exported uranium, gold, rubber, and other raw materials. The Allies heavily relied on these resources to support their war efforts. Additionally, the Belgian government in exile was the only exiled government with its national gold reserves also located in London. The resources provided financial independence and flexibility in its actions that the other governments in exile could not afford.   Thus, Pierlot was actively engaged in international cooperation. The Benelux Customs Union was founded on September 5, 1944, by the exiled governments of Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. By signing the UN Declaration in January 1942, Belgium gained the right to be admitted into the newly established United Nations.   The Belgian government in exile formed the Belgian Military Camp for Regrouping, which accommodated Belgian migrants and troops rescued from Dunkirk during Operation Dynamo. On September 6, 1944, the Allied forces liberated Brussels. Just two days later, the Belgian government in exile returned to its country.   5. Dutch Government in Exile: The London Cabinet Queen Wilhelmina, with a helmet in her left hand, on her arrival in London, May 14, 1940. Source: Anne Frank House, Amsterdam   On May 10, 1940, Nazi Germany invaded the Netherlands. The Dutch government, along with Queen Wilhelmina and her family, fled to London. They arrived on May 13 at Stratton House and formed the Dutch government in exile, widely referred to as the London Cabinet. The Dutch armed forces surrendered to Nazi Germany on May 15, 1940.   Fearing that Nazi Germany would invade Great Britain, Dutch Princess Juliana, the heir to the throne, relocated to Canada.   Inspired by the collaborative government of Vichy France, Prime Minister Dirk Jan de Geer suggested the queen collaborate with Adolf Hitler and return to the Netherlands. The queen resisted. Her strategic calculation was based on the fact that, in the case of collaboration, the Netherlands would be compelled to cede its oil-rich colonies of the Dutch East Indies to the Axis powers (namely Japan), as Vichy France had done in French Indochina. On September 23, 1941, Pieter Sjoerds Gerbrandy replaced Jan de Geer as the prime minister of the exiled government.   Netherlands after the Allied bombardment, February, 1944. Source: Never Was Mag / Centraal Regionaal Archief Nijmegen   On November 23, 1941, the Dutch government in exile made an agreement with the United States. The United States would control Dutch Guiana (Surinam), with the primary aim of protecting the bauxite mines from Japan. Winston Churchill, mesmerized by the Queen’s dedication and loyalty to the country, described her as “the only man in the Dutch government.”   In September 1944, the Dutch government in exile signed an agreement for a Benelux Customs Union with the Belgian and Luxembourgish governments in exile.   The Dutch government in exile formed a Dutch-led provisional military administration in 1943, also known as Militair Gezag, or Military Authority. When the Allied forces entered the Netherlands in June 1944, Maastricht became the first Dutch city under the Military Authority. The Militair Gezag was dissolved on March 4, 1946, following the end of World War II, and the government returned to the Netherlands.   6. Czechoslovakia’s Government in Exile Members of the Czech government in exile visiting Northern Ireland. Jan Masaryk, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Czechoslovakia on the right. Source: CEU Review of Books   The Czechoslovak government-in-exile, also referred to as the Provisional Czechoslovak Government, was established following the Nazi occupation of Sudetenland on March 15, 1938, and the subsequent surrender of the whole country.   On November 15, 1938, the Czechoslovak president, Edvard Beneš, and the government headed by Prime Minister Rudolf Beran arrived first in Paris, then in Angers. Angers, located southwest of Paris, was considered a relatively safer location compared to Paris. Following the Nazi invasion of France, the government in exile moved to London.   Parts of the military forces left in Czechoslovakia were ordered to evacuate to Poland, and later, they relocated to France as part of the agreement reached on October 2, 1939, which approved the reconstitution of the Czechoslovak army on French territory. The First Division of the Czechoslovak Army played a decisive role in the Battle of France.   The government in exile actively supported the local resistance movement, the Central Leadership of Home Resistance, and its military unit, the Nation’s Defense.   In 1939, the Czechoslovakian government in exile became known as the Czech National Liberation Committee. The key objective of the committee was international recognition as the legitimate representative of the country and the annulment of the Munich Agreement. This agreement, signed on September 30, 1938, by Nazi Germany, France, and Italy, formalized the German annexation of the Sudetenland, a region with a predominantly German population.   The government in exile achieved this aim following the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, a high-ranking Nazi official, in occupied Prague in June 1942. Heydrich’s assassination was orchestrated by Czechoslovak resistance fighters. Nazi Germany responded by severe repressions in occupied Czechoslovakia. The government in exile shed light on Nazi atrocities in their country, contributing to the rise of the international awareness of Czechoslovakia’s plight.   London in World War II. Source: Moss and Fog   The same year, Edvard Beneš repudiated the Munich Agreement together with Charles de Gaulle and Winston Churchill, earning much-needed legitimacy over the pre-1938 Czechoslovak Republic. The government in exile suggested the deportation of the ethnic Germans from the Sudetenland to Germany and Austria. The final agreement on this issue was reached at the Potsdam Conference held on August 2, 1945.   Planning the future of Czechoslovakia, in December 1943, Beneš sought close cooperation with the Soviet Union. His intentions were based on two key assumptions: first, by forming friendly relations with the Soviet Union, he hoped to avoid future communist coups in Czechoslovakia; secondly, according to his vision, Czechoslovakia had the mission of being “a bridge” between the Soviet Union and Western powers after the war. In December 1943, Beneš visited Moscow and concluded the alliance treaty, in which the Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin, recognized the pre-1938 borders of Czechoslovakia in exchange for the communist dominance in Czechoslovakia.   By April 1945, just before the end of World War II, Beneš arrived in Košice in eastern Slovakia. The Soviet Red Army had already liberated it from the Nazi forces. Beneš declared Košice the temporary capital of Czechoslovakia. Beneš announced the formation of a coalition government, with Klement Gottwald, the leader of the Communist Party, serving as prime minister. Edvard Beneš returned to Prague on May 16, 1945, following the end of World War II, and on June 19, 1946, he was reelected as president of Pro-Soviet Czechoslovakia.   7. Luxembourg’s Government in Exile Reconnaissance squads head the German advance into Luxembourg, May 10, 1940. Source: The Associated Press   Nazi Germany invaded the Duchy of Luxembourg on May 10, 1940. The government of Luxembourg, led by Pierre Dupong and the royal family, with Grand Duchess Charlotte, first fled to France, then to Lisbon, and finally settled in London in 1940. The royal family settled in Montréal, Canada.   The government in exile’s key aim was to acquire Luxembourg’s recognition as an equal member of Western society despite its weak military capabilities. In this regard, the government broadcast in occupied Luxembourg in the Luxembourgish language through BBC radio.   Meanwhile, in Luxembourg, Nazi Germany was actively pursuing Germanization policies. The Luxembourg Grey Book was published for English-speaking readers and press representatives. Grand Duchess Charlotte was vocal in Canada and the United States, advocating for an independent Luxembourg. Over time, the royal family became close to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and received multiple invitations to the White House.   By 1944, the government in exile had abandoned its earlier declared neutrality and formed the Luxembourg Battery. It was incorporated into the Piron Brigade of Belgium. Prince Jean, son of the Grand Duchess and future Grand Duke, participated in Irish Guards military operations (for example, the Battle of Caen, the liberation of Brussels, the liberation of Luxembourg, and Operation Market Garden in the Netherlands).   A meeting in London with Grand Duchess Charlotte and the four members of her government. Source: Europe Remembers / Cour grand-ducale   The Nazi occupation provided the Belgian and Luxembourgish governments in exile with new opportunities for cooperation. In an effort to deepen their economic ties, the two nations signed the Benelux Monetary Agreement on October 21, 1943, and the Convention of the Benelux Treaty with the Netherlands on September 5, 1944.   The Allied forces liberated Luxembourg on September 10, 1944. The government-in-exile returned a week later. The royal family and the Grand Duchess arrived in Luxembourg on April 14, 1945.   8. Greece in Exile: The Cairo Government A stereograph depicting the Nazi invasion of Athens, Greece, c. 1941-1942. Source: The Wiener Holocaust Library   Nazi Germany embarked on the invasion of Greece in April 1941. Greece’s King George II and his government, headed by newly appointed Prime Minister Emmanouil Tsouderos, were forced to leave mainland Greece for Crete on April 25, 1941. On May 24, they were forced to evacuate to Cairo, Egypt. For this reason, the Greek government in exile is often referred to as the Cairo Government. The Cairo Government remained primarily in Egypt until the end of World War II.   The Greek government in exile experienced numerous diplomatic challenges and internal divisions. Fortunately, Greece’s strong merchant marine fleet provided the government in exile with advantages and political leverage when negotiating with British officials since the Greek fleet proved significant in supplying food and other goods to the British Marines. Tsouderos had several reservations about the territorial expansion of post-war Greece. He clearly outlined to Britain that the Greek government in exile sought “enosis,” meaning reunion with the Greek-speaking population of Cyprus, the Dodecanese islands, southern Albania—or Northern Epirus as the Greek government called it—and Macedonia. According to Greek historian Procopis Papastratis, the territorial expansion plans of the Cairo government were “completely unrealistic.”   Communist partisans being arrested in Athens, December 1944. Source: BBC   By 1943, strong resistance groups had emerged in occupied Greece. Over time, the communist-leaning factions, the National Liberation Front (EAM), and its military wing, the National People’s Liberation Army (ELAS), acquired control over Greece’s vast mountainous territories. Sympathies towards the resistance movements grew among Greek forces in Cairo as well. Tsouderos was eventually forced to resign in 1944.   The Beirut Conference was held on May 17–20, 1944, between the government in exile and the representatives of the key Greek politicians, as well as the resistance groups, including EAM. According to the conference, a referendum would be held in post-war Greece regarding the king’s return. Guerrillas would accept the authority of the government-in-exile, and the resistance groups would be given a political voice in the Greek cabinet.   On October 17, 1944, Nazi Germany withdrew from Greece. The government in exile returned home, accompanied by British forces.   9. Yugoslavia’s Government in Exile Partisans liberate Sarajevo. Source: Balkan History   Nazi Germany, along with other Axis forces (Italian, Bulgarian, and Hungarian), invaded Yugoslavia on April 6, 1941. The capital city of Belgrade fell on April 12, 1941. In just two days, Yugoslavia’s King Peter II and the government, headed by Dušan Simović, went into exile. The government-in-exile’s road before settling in London in June 1941 was long, encompassing Greece, Palestine, Cairo, and Egypt. King Peter II, an 18-year-old monarch, was greeted with honor in Britain, symbolizing the struggle and freedom of rapidly destabilized Yugoslavia.  In occupied Yugoslavia, an armed resistance movement emerged almost simultaneously with the Nazi occupation. The most well-known and influential group was the Chetniks, headed by Draža Mihailović, composed of the remnants of the official Yugoslav army. The Chetniks supported the integration of Yugoslavia with the Western Allies against communism. The Communist partisans, led by Josip Broz Tito, envisioned the reunification of war-torn Yugoslavia in the form of a socialist state.   In the struggle for power, Tito prevailed and became the dominant force in resistance movements. In 1942, he declared the establishment of the provisional government of Yugoslavia, the National Liberation Movement (NLM).   Planning for Yugoslavia’s post-World War II future, the government in exile, led by recently appointed President Ivan Šubašić, reached a deal with the temporary government on June 16, 1944, acknowledging Tito’s accomplishments and efforts in liberating Yugoslavia. The British government mediated the agreement.   Portrait of Josip Broz Tito. By Yousuf Karsh. 1954. Source: Yousuf Karsh Gallery   These two sides signed the Belgrade Agreement on November 1, 1944. The agreement stated that members of the government in exile and Tito’s National Liberation Committee of Yugoslavia would form a temporary government. The new government would be tasked with arranging elections for the Constitutional Assembly, which would have the authority to choose Yugoslavia’s future governance.   In a national election held on November 11, 1945, the United National Front (UNF), led by Tito, won. The government in exile of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia dissolved on March 7, 1945, when Tito was elected president of the newly established Democratic Federal Yugoslavia.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

“If you look at it, it’s my reputation… I need five months to prepare a show, and I can’t be writing new songs or promoting the album”: Is this why Kate Bush only ever toured once?
Favicon 
www.loudersound.com

“If you look at it, it’s my reputation… I need five months to prepare a show, and I can’t be writing new songs or promoting the album”: Is this why Kate Bush only ever toured once?

Gruelling exertion, exhilaration, determination and a human tragedy all played a part in her 1979 Tour Of Life – and she never hit the road again
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 61341 out of 126232
  • 61337
  • 61338
  • 61339
  • 61340
  • 61341
  • 61342
  • 61343
  • 61344
  • 61345
  • 61346
  • 61347
  • 61348
  • 61349
  • 61350
  • 61351
  • 61352
  • 61353
  • 61354
  • 61355
  • 61356
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund