Ban men from women's sports.

If they don’t grow in right, most people will treat their wisdom teeth as bio-baggage, useful only for preventing money from burning a hole in one’s pocket due to the surgical costs of removing them. But an astounding new discovery has found that this third set of molars contain a unique form of human stem […] The post Wisdom Teeth Contain Unique Stem Cell That Can Form Cartilage, Neurons, and Heart Tissue appeared first on Good News Network.

Movies & TV Jurassic World Rebirth Jurassic World Rebirth Is More of a Retread We’ve had seven movies and still I must ask: WHEN WILL IT BE ANKYLOSAURUS’ TIME TO SHINE?? By Leah Schnelbach | Published on July 3, 2025 Comment 0 Share New Share Jurassic World Rebirth is a standalone sequel to 2022’s Jurassic World Dominion—a film I did not see. This iterations was directed by Gareth Edwards, and written by screenwriter David Koepp, who co-wrote the original Jurassic Park, and its sequel The Lost World,  also wrote two of my favorite films of the year so far, Prescence and Black Bag, both with director Steven Soderberg. Scarlett Johansson plays Zora Bennett, the guide protecting the mission paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis, and the slutty little glasses he bears on his adorable face. Dr. Loomis is played by Jonathan Bailey, the glasses are played by an excellent pair of glasses. Mahershala Ali, who will always be Blade in my mind even if he never gets to play him onscreen, is Duncan Kincaid, Zora’s right hand person, and Ed Skrein, Philippine Velge, and Bechir Sylvain round out the team as Bobby, Nina, and Leclerc. (The syringe? Big. The glasses? Captivating.) Credit: Universal Pictures The mission is set in motion by ParkerGenix wonk Martin Krebs, who is played by Rupert Friend, thus providing a physical manifestation of the question “If not friend why Friend-shaped?” (For a friendlier Friend, allow me to direct you to this recent Wes Anderson fountain pen ad, of which he is the star.) Manuel Garcia-Rulfo is Reuben Delgado (more on him in a minute), whose family is rescued by Duncan after a totally avoidable shipwreck that is entirely Mr. Delgado’s fault. Mr. Delgado is joined by his two daughters, teenage Teresa (Luna Blaise), and very small Isabella (Audrina Miranda). Teresa’s boyfriend Xavier (David Iacono) is along for the shipwrecking as well, for no reason I can understand, and soon became my second favorite character in the film. I often really love it when a movie is multiple movies in one. I like big swings. I like dissonant tones and jangling character work and mood shifts and weird subplots and tonal cul de sacs. …when they work. Parts of Jurassic World Rebirth work quite well. Jonathan Bailey’s Dr. Henry Loomis is now my second favorite character in the entire franchise, after Dr. Ian Malcolm, and he and Scarlett Johansson develop decent chemistry over the course of the film. The adventure aspects, when all the characters have to troop through the jungle while all manner of dinos surround them, are fun. And best of all, there are a few moments that reach for the transcendent joy of Drs. Alan Grant and Ellie Sattler first staring awestruck at a herd of dinosaurs all the way back in Jurassic Park. Also, and this might be the bit I appreciated the most, almost everyone in the film is on the same page that the dinosaurs are living, feeling creatures, who deserve to be left alone to live their lives. No one’s here to hunt. There was an almost elegiac undertone here, a feeling that these people, decades after Isla Nublar, know that we shouldn’t have dragged the dinosaurs into our time, and know that the environment is too important for human tampering. This is underscored by the idea, repeated a few times, that most people simply don’t care about the dinosaurs anymore. Bringing them back led to about a decade of excited theme park visits, but now everyone’s Over It. Which is interesting as a springboard for worldbuilding, but I’m forced to ask question: Have any of the writers met a four-year-old, ever? As long as humanity keeps producing four-year-olds, I can think of a way these kooky parks might just stay in business. He’s great here, but you have to see him in The Phoenecian Scheme. Credit: Universal Pictures BUT. For the purposes of the film, interest has waned. This is about to leave Dr. Henry Loomis out of a dino job. But the untrustworthy Mr. Krebs has a project: the scientists at his company have discovered that they can synthesize a miraculous heart treatment from the blood of dinosaurs. For some reason that is not adequately explained, they need to get samples from a Land Dino, a Water Dino, and an Air Dino. (I’m assuming this is story takes place before the Fire Dino attacks.) He collects a team to travel to the Caribbean to retrieve blood samples, with Loomis acting as dinosaur expert, Zora Bennett acting as security, and Zora’s ragtag team of misfits and mercs getting them in and out of a region that is technically legally off-limits to any human, of any nation, for any reason. Obviously nothing’s gonna go wrong. After way too much exposition, and a scene of trauma-info-expo-dump that Johansson and Ali somehow made almost palatable, they’re all underway, and for a little while the film just about works. Meanwhile, the Delgado family are sailing through this off-limits area for reasons that defy reason, and they are on a collision course with wackiness CERTAIN BLOODY DINOSAUR-BASED DEATH. I’m going to do my best not to spoil the film, as I’ve said, but I do have to talk about one thing,  and that one thing is that this family, who end up crossing paths with our expedition and becoming co-leads, are being led by the worst cinematic dad I have ever seen. Not the actor! Manuel Garcia-Rulfo does a fine job with the role. But this Dad needs to seriously rethink his Dadding. He’s worse than Sarik. Worse than the dad from East of Eden. Worse than Darth Vader. You have to work your way down the list to King Triton and Leland Palmer to out-do this Dad. The only way his decisions make sense is if he’s actively trying to lose his kids in an “accident” for insurance purposes.   This man decides that in order to celebrate the last summer before his teenage daughter goes off to NYU, he needs to sail across the Caribbean with her very small younger sister, and, INEXPLICABLY, her boyfriend, whose only character trait for the first 1/3 of the film is “this boy is so lazy and sleepy all the time it’s incomprehensible that he got off the couch to join them on this trip.” (As I said, he gets better, provides some of the best laughs in the film, and became my Second Favorite Character by the end.) The introduction of the family is mostly just Mr. Delgado being angry at Xavier for not helping out on the boat, but I missed a lot of the nuance because my entire brain was screaming “Why is he on this family trip? Why have you brought your tiny daughter who doesn’t even know how to tie knots yet?? Why are any of you on this trip through the forbidden dinosaur ocean???” Mosasaurus has long been known as the Orca of the ancient world. Credit: Universal Pictures And like, what are the sleeping arrangements on this small boat????? On this trip that consists of Dad, Teenage Daughter, Tiny Innocent Daughter, and Teenage Daughter’s Teenage Boyfriend!!!!! This is not a yacht, this is a mid-size sailboat, and there is no privacy. I just…I can’t think about this anymore, let me get back to Dad’s incompetence. Naturally things go sideways, (“things” = their tiny, tiny boat, and, eventually, Dad’s leg) which means they have to join up with Zora, Dr. Loomis, and their whole crew. But at one point all the people have to split up and trek across Ile Saint-Hubert, where the poor little girl is terrorized into a night catatonic state. And here’s where the dad’s other fuckup lies: he keeps telling them all “It’ll be OK”, “You’re OK”, “The [place I’ve never been to] is only a mile away”—stuff like that. And maybe this is simply my abrupt and unexpected passion for The Pitt speaking, but DON’T MAKE PROMISES YOU CANNOT KEEP. Especially not to terrified children. If you’re in a life-threatening situation, you don’t tell the kids “You’re ok” when they’re obviously NOT, and you don’t tell them places are a specific distance when you have no clue how much they’ll have to walk. Of course you need hope in a situation like that (ummm a situation where you’re on the run from dinosaurs who have been brought back to life WHY WERE YOU SAILING THROUGH THESE WATERS THERE ARE SO MANY OTHER DINO-FREE WATERS) but false hope is just going to be demoralizing in the long run. OK. Thank you for letting me get that out of my system. Just imagine how cool this character would look in a black leather duster, wielding a sword, killing vampires. Credit: Universal Pictures As I said, once everyone’s on Ile Saint-Hubert, and they’re evading being a dino charcuterie board, this film can be a fun watch. But even here it’s so tonally jarring that I was pushed out at times. One second we’re fully invested in Dr. Henry Loomis’ awestruck wonder at seeing live dinosaurs in their natural habitat, the next we’re watching little Isabella get menaced by a T-Rex in a scene that verges on trauma porn, and finally tips into emotional manipulation, and I say this as someone who can’t keep the grin off my face every time I see the “Tim and Lexi are trapped in the car by the T-Rex” scene in the original. But then they have to climb down to a Quetzalcoatlus’s nest, or a Raptor Pack makes an appearance, and all is forgiven again. My biggest issue with the film, other than the inclusion of the Delgado contingent, is that the writing is too expository and repetitive—if it turned out that this was two separate drafts, outlining two separate directions for the franchise, that were then mashed together into one script not unlike an ungainly mutated dinosaur, it would not surprise me. I ended up feeling like we were told almost everything at least twice, but in slightly different way. The same dinosaur is described as being the size of a school bus and the size of an F-16—just pick one! And only tell us once! This is a movie, we want to be surprised when we see it! People repeat their traumas multiple times while different slowed-down variants of John Williams’ classic theme plays—we get that they’re traumatized! Let us stay in the moment! Reuben Delgado tries to act vaguely Father Figure-ish to Xavier multiple times, which like, no! He can do better! Let Dr. Loomis parent him! The film is also at least a half an hour longer than it needs to be. I kept imagining a stronger version, that was simply about a scientific expedition to the island with way less tragic backstory and way more dinosaurs. One thing that works really well, and maybe brings this closer to being a horror film, is that multiple times the audience realizes that there’s a dinosaur lurking near a human long before the human realizes it. This creates an effective sense of dread and menace—there are a few actual jump scares, but a lot of these scenes are just hammering home the idea that the humans do not belong there. They are in someone else’s home, and they need to be polite and get out as fast as possible. We get some greatest hits: Dilophosaurus (The One that Ate Newman) Compsognathus (The Vicious Little Suckers from the opening of The Lost World), T-Rex of course, some Velociraptors, and one way-too-brief appearance by the Objectively Best Dino: Ankylosaur. (Don’t worry, she doesn’t get hurt.) We’re treated to star turns from four newer ones: Aquilops, Mosasaurus (who made such an, um, impression in Jurassic World), a Titanosaurus, and a Quetzalcoatlus. There’s one more dinosaur who gets a big role, but to discuss her I’ll need to get a little more spoilery, so please skip down a paragraph if you want to go in cold. The Arrival sequel takes a dark turn. Credit: Universal Pictures This movie’s big reveal is a mutated creature called a D-Rex, and my question here is a simple one: WHY. WHY WOULD SOMEONE CREATE THIS. WHO SIGNED OFF ON IT. WHY DID NO ONE EVER SAY NO. It’s literally a supersized T-Rex, except with a fucking Xenomorph head. I’m not kidding. I often mention in my review of horror movies that nothing scares me, but, well, we might have found the thing. Spoilers are now extinct! It’s safe to rejoin the review! But by far the best aspect of the film, as I said, is just how much it’s #TeamDino. At one point a merc shows off the neurotoxin darts he’s brought along for protection, and when Dr. Loomis is horrified at them, the merc says “Is this the part where you tell me it’s a crime to kill a dinosaur?” and he snaps back with “No, it’s a sin to kill a dinosaur.” The other mercs smile at that, but it quickly becomes clear that they agree with him more than Mr. Neurotoxin. Dr. Loomis is a proud, enthusiastic nerd, and no one ever barks at him to “Speak ENGLISH!” or rushes him along when he finally comes face-to-face with creatures he’s only seen in books. Look how happy he is! Why can’t the whole movie be this? Credit: Universal Pictures At one point he tells the others, “I want to die in a shallow pool and be covered by silt,” one of the grizzled jacks-of-all-trades sincerely replies with “That’s beautiful, man,” only for Loomis to follow up with “that’s the best chance of fossilization.” Which is a really funny bit, but he means it, and no one makes fun of him for it. Later, when he explains that humans probably won’t last as long as dinosaurs did, and that “Earth will shake us off like a summer cold” everyone just listens to him and accepts it. His nerdery is appreciated and respected, and he and Zora develop a really nice bond over the course of the film that I suppose could become romantic if they make more of these, but as it stands they become two coworkers who like each other as people, and have each others’ backs. Of course, Zora’s own personality and motivation is all over the map, but at least she’s a bad ass without being a bully for no reason. (There’s also no weird subplot implying that any of the women in the movie need to get cracking on the childbearing—a plus after Jurassic World!)   Does the film stick the landing? Parts of it. The action all culminates in a series of pretty intense, Alien-ish chase scenes, with characters either acting in their own or each others’ interests in ways that make emotional sense, even if they do become a bit ham-fisted. And don’t worry, just as in all Jurassic films, a couple people make truly idiotic decisions that might lead to sequels. But at the same time , does the film really need to exist? Not really. It’s much, much better than Jurassic World, but that’s not much of a bar to clear. I just hope that, if filmmakers are going to keep bringing these poor creatures back from extinction, they’ll come up with more interesting stuff for them to do.[end-mark] Note: Comments will be closed through the weekend, and will re-open on Monday, July 7th. The post <em>Jurassic World Rebirth</em> Is More of a Retread appeared first on Reactor.

Few films have left a mark on pop culture quite like Back to the Future. Released in 1985, Robert Zemeckis’ time-traveling adventure wasn’t just a box office smash, it became a generational touchstone. From its CONTINUE READING... The post Back to the Future: A TRN Round Table appeared first on The Retro Network.

Hamas has placed bounties on the heads of American and local Gaza Humanitarian Foundation workers. But the Rev. Johnnie Moore, the group’s executive chairman, says, “If all of these threats are intended to shut us down, it’s just not going to work.”   “Terrorists want to cause you to be afraid,” Moore said. “I’m a Christian. The Bible says, ‘God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of sound thinking, of clear thinking,‘” the evangelical leader said, citing the Book of 2 Timothy in the Bible. Since its launch May 26, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has delivered over 50 million meals to the people of Gaza, continuing to work in the war-torn region even after Hamas attacked a group of Palestinian Gaza Humanitarian Foundation workers in June. Hamas has killed 12 local Gaza Humanitarian Foundation workers and tortured others, according to the humanitarian group.   Before the launch of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, Hamas confiscated much of the aid that entered Gaza, Moore told The Daily Signal.   As aid trucks entered Gaza, Hamas would “at gunpoint, take over the truck … many hundreds of trucks, steal the aid entirely, then they resell it to the Gazans, aid meant to be given for free to Gazans,” Moore said. Hamas hoards the food “in warehouses for their own purposes, they use it for other nefarious purposes, and so our one goal is to get free food to Gazans,” he said.   To deliver food to the people of Gaza and prevent Hamas from disrupting the aid deliveries, Moore said the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has created a system “from the bottom up” to ensure the aid is not diverted.   Both the U.S. and Israel are backing the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. At the end of June, the Trump administration approved $30 million in funding for the aid group. Moore, a longtime supporter of President Donald Trump, was co-chairman of Trump’s evangelical advisory board during the 2016 campaign.    Despite Moore’s message that the group’s only objective is to deliver aid to the citizens of Gaza, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is facing opposition from more than just Hamas.   The humanitarian group has faced repeated criticism from the United Nations. As recently as last Friday, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation “inherently unsafe,” claiming the group “is killing people.”  In June, the U.N. human rights office claimed that about “410 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli military while trying to fetch from controversial new aid hubs in Gaza—a likely war crime.”   In addition to the U.N., a group of 171 charities and nongovernmental organizations, including Amnesty International and Save the Children, have called for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to be dismantled, citing concerns over civilian deaths at distribution sites.   Medical authorities in Gaza claim 500 people have been killed while trying to access aid or along aid transportation routes since the humanitarian group began its operation in the region.   Moore pushed back on the claims, saying “there have been no violent incidences at our sites or involving any of our people.”   “We contest some of these reports for a couple of reasons,” Moore said. “The first reason is … we can’t control outside the perimeter of our sites. This is a hot war, we’re not operating in a ceasefire, we are operating in the middle of a war.”   It is clear, according to Moore, that there “have been some civilian deaths, but circumstances around those deaths, the scale of those casualties, all of those details, it’s quite clear that no one knows those things.”  “But what we do know,” he continued, “is that every single day, the Hamas health ministry in Gaza releases numbers of casualties and they attribute 100% of those casualties to having happened at or near our sites, and it’s just not true. It’s a lie. It’s like part of the information warfare part of Hamas’ military operation.”   The reports of death from the Gaza Health Ministry are intended to “scare Gazans from coming to our sites or to rally international opposition to us,” Moore said.   When there have been incidents involving the Israel Defense Forces around aid distribution sites, Moore says the IDF has “been open about it” and opened investigations to determine what happened.   The IDF has acknowledged that some Palestinian civilians have been killed by its gunfire near aid distribution sites and says it is investigating each incident but says the number of deaths reported from the Gaza Health Ministry have been exaggerated.   “What we know on the Hamas side is they are absolutely intentionally murdering people and for two reasons: to lie and say that we killed those people, or the IDF killed those people, and to try to turn the world against us and to keep the Gazan people from coming to us,” Moore said.   Despite concerns over violence around aid distribution sites, Moore says, “Gazans keep showing up, and we keep showing up and we try to set the record straight for one reason: The people of Gaza deserve to eat, and they can’t rely on anybody else. They got to rely on us. And we’re 50 million meals in, and we’re just going to keep at it, despite all the lies.”   The post Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Won’t Stop Aid Distribution After Hamas Puts Bounties on Workers appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) is stepping into a legal battle that challenges the powerful alliance between major media outlets and tech corporations accused of stifling independent journalism. The case, brought by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and a collection of independent publishers and reporters, targets the “Trusted News Initiative” (TNI), an international consortium that includes the likes of the BBC, Reuters, The Associated Press, and The Washington Post. Central to the lawsuit is the charge that TNI and its tech partners unlawfully coordinated efforts to silence smaller media competitors by branding their work as “misinformation” or “disinformation” and throttling their reach online. We obtained a copy of the notice of intent for you here. The plaintiffs contend that this alleged scheme violates the Sherman Antitrust Act by effectively shutting independent voices out of the marketplace of ideas. The lawsuit, originally filed in 2023, had seen little movement until recently. The DOJ last week filed a formal notice in federal court indicating it will submit a statement of interest by mid-July. The agency cited the case’s focus on “anticompetitive collusion among competitors over product features” as a matter of federal concern. For those fighting the case, the DOJ’s involvement signals a hopeful shift. Mary Holland, CHD’s CEO, called the announcement “welcome” and pointed to what she described as years of weak federal antitrust enforcement. Kim Mack Rosenberg, CHD’s general counsel, added that the DOJ’s interest could help break the logjam that has slowed the case, stating that she is “awaiting the statement of interest here with great interest.” The plaintiffs represent a broad swath of independent media and public figures, including Creative Destruction Media, TrialSite News, The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft, Health Nut News publisher Erin Elizabeth Finn, Dr. Joseph Mercola, journalist Ben Swann, and Ty and Charlene Bollinger, known for their platforms The Truth About Cancer and The Truth About Vaccines. They argue that through shadow bans, removals, and other forms of suppression, tech firms aligned with TNI deliberately crippled their ability to operate and reach audiences. The TNI brands itself as a coalition working to counter harmful “disinformation.” Among its participants are not only legacy media institutions but also tech giants like Google, Meta, and Microsoft. The plaintiffs argue, however, that behind this mission lies a coordinated strategy to crush economic competition. Evidence cited in the complaint includes public remarks from TNI insiders. For instance, former BBC senior news controller Jamie Angus described the real competition facing major news outlets as “a tidal wave of unchecked [reporting] that’s being piped out mainly through digital platforms.” CHD contends that this reflects TNI’s true motivation: protecting market share under the pretext of curbing false information. Holland stated plainly, “They colluded expressly to suppress economic competition.” Further allegations center on TNI’s targeting of COVID-19 narratives that did not align with government and establishment positions. The complaint outlines how the initiative’s so-called early warning system alerted Big Tech companies to voices labeled as problematic, leading to what the plaintiffs describe as a coordinated group boycott that devastated their visibility and advertising income. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post DOJ Joins Lawsuit Against Media-Tech Collusion Over Free Speech appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

We’re absolutely thrilled to share that History Hit won Best Factual Channel at the prestigious Broadcast Digital Awards 2025! Furthermore, Endurance, which we co-produced with Little Dot Studios, National Geographic Documentaries, Consequential LLC and Little Monster Films for Disney+, won the award for Best Documentary Programme. Our win for Best Factual Channel follows two consecutive years of being named as Best Specialist Channel. The judges at Broadcast (MBI) recognised History Hit’s unique approach to bringing history to life, praising our “real ambition” and “dynamic approach” to the genre, noting that our “multiplatform reach, consistent output, and expert-led storytelling” make us a “standout destination for passionate audiences.” Another judge commended our truly “360-degree approach across YouTube, SVOD and podcasts in a way that feels digital first and impressively authentic.” Such recognition is particularly meaningful, given we were shortlisted alongside industry giants including National Geographic, BBC Earth, LadBible Stories, More 4, and U&Yesterday.  As our Executive Producer, Bill Locke, put it: Winning Best Specialist channel two years in a row was already pretty amazing, but to score a hat-trick with the Best Factual Channel this year is totally gobsmacking! We’re really lucky to make films about the subjects we love. We’ve got a top team who work really hard to share great stories from the past – it may sound corny, but we can only do that thanks to our subscribers who help keep us on the history road. Thank you to Broadcast and the judges for these incredible honours, and a huge thank you to you, our subscribers, for being a part of our winning journey.

The planet's day length was particularly tricky to pin down, even more so than Jupiter's.

This content is for members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read. The post DNA and 64-Codon Mystery: Is Biology the Key to Proving Simulation? appeared first on Anomalien.com.

President Donald Trump determined on his first day back in office that the "current situation at the southern border qualifies as an invasion under Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution."He then proclaimed, pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act, that migrants stealing into the homeland would henceforth be restricted from claiming asylum until the invasion was over. Those who failed to provide federal officials with sufficient personal information at legal ports of entry would similarly be restricted in making asylum claims.Of course, this proclamation enraged all the usual suspects on the left, including the American Civil Liberties Union, which challenged the asylum ban in February on behalf of three radical activist groups and a handful of foreigners denied asylum.'An appeal to necessity cannot fill that void.'According to the activist groups' complaint, the proclamation was "as unlawful as it is unprecedented," and "immigration — even at elevated levels — is not an 'invasion.'"On Wednesday, an Obama judge weaseled around the U.S. Supreme Court's June 27 determination regarding nationwide injunctions in Trump v. CASA Inc. in order to universally bar the administration from expelling asylum seekers from the United States.RELATED: Lawfare strikes again: Rogue judge ignores SCOTUS, shields 500,000 from Trump's immigration crackdown Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesU.S. District Judge Randolph Moss said Trump had exceeded his executive authority in adopting "an alternative immigration system" and that his day-one proclamation was unlawful."Nothing in the INA or the Constitution grants the president or his delegees the sweeping authority asserted in the Proclamation and implementing guidance," wrote Moss. "An appeal to necessity cannot fill that void."While the Supreme Court indicated last week that the national injunctions weaponized against the Trump administration by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts," Justice Brett Kavanaugh recognized in his concurring opinion that district courts may still be able to "grant or deny the functional equivalent of a universal injunction — for example, by granting or denying a preliminary injunction to a putative nationwide class under Rule 23(b)(2)."Moss embraced this "functional equivalent of a universal injunction" and certified all border-jumping asylum seekers "who are now or will be present in the United States" as a protected class.'The American people see right through this.'Moss did, however, stay his ruling two weeks pending an appeal from the Trump administration. Depending on how the appeal goes, the floodgates could be reopened to multitudes of foreign nationals seeking asylum."To try to circumvent the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions a marxist judge has declared that all potential FUTURE illegal aliens on foreign soil (eg a large portion of planet earth) are part of a protected global 'class' entitled to admission into the United States," wrote White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.Miller added, "The West will not survive if our sovereignty is not restored."Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin similarly underscored the gravity of Moss' ruling, noting in a statement obtained by CNN, "The President secured the border in historic fashion by using every available legal tool provided by Congress. Today, a rogue district judge took those tools away, threatening the safety and security of Americans and ignoring a Supreme Court decision issued only days earlier admonishing district courts for granting nationwide injunctions."RELATED: Alligator Alcatraz is a warning to illegal immigrants in the US: Leave now or end up here Photo by GUILLERMO ARIAS/AFP via Getty ImagesWhile the White House did not comment on whether Trump might follow President Abraham Lincoln's example of taking actions that bypass or supersede the rulings of meddlesome judges, it indicated the administration expects to win on appeal."A local district court judge has no authority to stop President Trump and the United States from securing our border from the flood of aliens trying to enter illegally," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement to Blaze News. "The judge's decision — which contradicts the Supreme Court's ruling against granting universal relief — would allow entry into the United States of all aliens who may ever try to come in illegally.""This is an attack on our Constitution, the laws Congress enacted, and our national sovereignty," continued Jackson. "We expect to be vindicated on appeal."Attorney General Pam Bondi characterized Moss as a "rogue" judge "trying to circumvent the Supreme Court's recent ruling against nationwide injunctions.""The American people see right through this," said Bondi. "Our attorneys ... will fight this unconstitutional power grab as [Trump] continues to secure our border."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!