In a memorandum dated July 20, addressed to "Concerned Citizens of the United States," former President Donald Trump's former physician, Dr. Ronny Jackson, detailed the alarming nature of the injury Trump sustained when a bullet, fired by 20-year-old would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks, struck his ear. Dr. Jackson -- who...

Well, well, well….it looks like our reporting was SPOT ON once again….and about 5 days before Fox News figured it out. Actually, I don’t want to imply that it was anything I did. No, I simply talk to the right people and have good sources. All the credit for this one goes to Jovan Pulitzer, who told me this back on Tuesday of this week in our interview that has since gone absolutely viral. And for good reason. Because Jovan was not only early in his analysis, but he was dead on in everything he was telling me. Let’s take a moment to see the new update from Fox News and then I’ll tell you everything Jovan told me. BREAKING: Fox News reports that a local sn*per team *did* fire a shot during the assas*ination attempt on Donald Trump. The development appears to confirm that there were indeed three separate sho*ters as the incident unfolded. According to Fox, a local sn*per tried taking… pic.twitter.com/3B0K7GV6ki — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 20, 2024 BREAKING: Fox News reports that a local sn*per team *did* fire a shot during the assas*ination attempt on Donald Trump. The development appears to confirm that there were indeed three separate sho*ters as the incident unfolded. According to Fox, a local sn*per tried taking out Crooks but missed. A USSS sn*per was the one who took out Crooks in what they call a “one in a million shot.” “We’re also told a local police sn*per took a single shot as well, but missed.” Ok, so now let’s analyze what Jovan told me. Because I think what’s happening here is what the MSM always does…. They slow drip the truth, and it’s never quite the real truth, it’s always some deviation of the real truth, but they have to slow drip it to move the narrative from what they initially told you — because they’re usually so wrong it takes a lot of effort and a long time for them to gradually drift towards the truth. And the truth here is that Jovan believes there were indeed two snipers, but not in the way Fox News explains it. Not two different snipers for the good guys….but two different snipers for the bad guys! In other words, a second shooter who was the REAL shooter.  The kid was just the patsy, designed to distract everyone from the real shooter. That’s Jovan’s take. So why is Fox News now coming out and admitting there was a THIRD shooter? Because it’s undeniable at this point that there were at least three shooters. That dam has broken. News was flooded on Friday with multiple people releasing forensic audio analysis proving at least three distinct shooters. Like this: BREAKING: Audio Analysis Is 100% Clear Trump& Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People So that's why the MSM is now admitting it. They have to. They can't keep this genie in the bottle, it's already out. So what's they're only other option. Spin it with misinformation. Admit to three shooters, but claim the third one was a good guy sniper. The truth is almost always a complete 180 from whatever narrative the MSM is telling you. Here's the real truth and we had it from Jovan back on Tuesday: Jovan Pulitzer: "Return Snipers Did NOT Kill Him" -- "There Was A Second Malvo Shooter!" This is an absolute bombshell report and interview....and for those of you who know me, I don't throw that word around very often because I like it to retain it's meaning and impact. So I had Jovan Pulitzer back on my show today to discuss a full forensic audit of the Trump shooting. There's no one better out there to conduct a forensic audit than Jovan, and those of you who know him know that to be true. The man leaves NO stone unturned and he thinks outside the box most people think in. So I was fascinated to hear what he had to say about everything....and absolutely blown away by some of his early conclusions. First up, while I had him I got his quick thoughts on Vice President JD Vance and while I won't go into those in this article, I'll say they very closely matched mine -- and even my process for coming to the same conclusions.  So that was nice to see. Ok now to the shooting.... The first thing I wanted to get off the table quickly was whether or not it was possible this was staged in any way by Team Trump.  A "sympathy shooting". Jovan quickly put that to bed with a firm no. You can listen to the interview to hear exactly why, but I agree 100%. So then we started talking about the "Balance of Possibilities" and applying Occam's Razor to come to a theory of what likely happened here. Jovan says in situations like this he likes to find the "Second Right Answer" meaning (I think) that the answer they give you at first, and the narrative they try to sell you, likely isn't the truth. So in this case, that means the 20 year old kid being the shooter, and being noticed by people in the crowd, and even confronted by police at one point, and now dead so case closed -- that probably isn't the right answer. So what is? Basically, this.... You need to listen to the interview in full (and maybe even twice -- many people are telling me they are listening twice already, that's how big this is becoming), but here's the quick summary.... Jovan does not think the 20 year old kid was the Trump shooter.  He was the patsy.  Sure, he was allowed to carry the gun up there and get in position and ultimately got blown away.  But he wasn't the Trump shooter. Also, Jovan does not think the Snipers on the rooftop behind Trump are the ones who took out the kid.  He says if you look at the pictures of the kid after he was dead, all of the evidence (teeth pointing forward, etc) all suggest the kid was shot from behind. So where does that leave things? Simply this: there were at least one and maybe two other shooters. Hello, grassy knoll!  We've got a new JFK. But it makes total sense. The kid was a very bad shot, nothing about his story lines up, and it's highly unlikely that even at a (relatively) close distance for most good shooters, that he would make such a perfect shot on Trump. Remember, it was only by the grace of God that Trump turned his head those 1-2 inches at the exact last moment, otherwise it would have been a PERFECT kill shot. The trajectory of the bullet also tells a different story, but you have to watch the interview to have Jovan explain that in detail.  We went over it multiple times. In short, Jovan thinks this was the work of an expert gunman farther away. The kid was the cover story. The real shots came from the expert sniper farther out. And then either that sniper or someone else took out the kid, because of course we need a dead assailant to say "case closed!" And now the kicker..... Jovan also thinks that second shooter was likely done Malvo-style. Do you remember Malvo? The DC shooter? The guy who they couldn't catch because he shot out of a small hole in the back of his car? Jovan thinks something exactly like that happened here. There would be no chance of it being caught on video surveillance or cell phone anywhere.  Not out in the open. Just a Cadillac DeVille perhaps, parked maybe 300 yards out with the perfect line of sight? Oh my! I told you this was a bombshell. Folks, if Jovan is right about even 50% of this, then you have a conspiracy the likes of which could tear this country apart! But the truth must come out, at all costs. We talked about a ton more, including Trump body doubles, what Trump should do next, whether Trump immediately goes into a bunker for his 2nd Term, Bitcoin, crypto, the US Dollar, and a lot more! This was truly one that blew me away, and in no part due to anything I did or said -- this was all my guest and he absolutely blew the lid off this thing. Please watch here: Backup on Twitter here: Incredible chat with Jovan Pulitzer breaking down the Trump shooting..."RETURN SNIPERS DID NOT KILL HIM!"@JovanHPulitzer WATCH HERE? pic.twitter.com/QGVAzHIayu — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 16, 2024 Incredible chat with Jovan Pulitzer breaking down the Trump shooting... "RETURN SNIPERS DID NOT KILL HIM!"@JovanHPulitzer WATCH HERE pic.twitter.com/QGVAzHIayu — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) July 16, 2024 If you want more, follow Jovan on Rumble here: https://rumble.com/c/JovanHuttonPulitzer And Telegram here: https://t.me/JovanHuttonPulitzer I would really love to hear what you all think! Please leave a comment below. And SHARE to get this word out. Thank you. And if you missed my last interview with Jovan, you can catch that here -- he's quickly becoming a great new friend: My EXCLUSIVE Interview With Jovan Pulitzer A few days ago, I published a look back at the 2020 Election and all the "election fraud" that may or may not have been captured at the time. One of the leading experts in that work was Jovan Pulitzer, and I re-ran this report to remind people just how much evidence we have already gathered and confirmed: FLASHBACK: Jovan Pulitzer: It’s Not the ‘Watermarks’ on the Ballots – It’s Better! I met Jovan in person last year at an event we were both at, and he's truly one of the best people to chat with. We had an absolute blast chatting about all things politics and really digging into the mechanics of the 2020 Steal....often chatting for 2+ hours in between sessions of the event we were attending. I told him we needed to have that same chat live on my show and life got in the way and we never made it happen...until now. When he saw me run that article above, he reached out and we finally connected to do this chat live on my show! And I am SO EXCITED to show it to you! We went for almost 3 hours and I was absolutely fascinated all the way through.  The time flew by! I have multiple pages of notes, but here are some highlights: We talked about his Christmas 2023 visit to Mar-a-Lago and his meeting with President Trump in his secret back office. People, Paper, Programs -- he explains what this means in the interview. We talked about the results of his Arizona audit (440,000 discrepancies out of 2,000,000 votes, and 70/30 of those swinging to Biden!) Voter Fraud vs. Election Fraud Is it "watermarks" or something much more? 20 different factors! The "stochastic pixel" We spent a lot of time talking about Jovan's incredible inventions and patents (you have no idea all this man has done!) And a ton more! We also talked about his two books, which I will put links for down below. I then asked him the million dollar question: if they stole it in 2020, what will stop them from stealing it again in 2024? The answer is something every single patriot needs to hear right now. At the end, we did a rapid fire set of questions where I asked him "White hat or Black hat"..... Vivek Elon Musk Kash Patel Kari Lake General Flynn And many more..... He answered almost all of them, with a few surprises! Only a few he didn't answer if he didn't have enough personal interactions on which to base an opinion. I think you're really going to love this. Please enjoy: Backup on Twitter here if needed: ? EXCLUSIVE: Jovan Pulitzer Explains How He Caught Them All In Arizona! (Watermarked Ballots?)#DailyTruthReport@JovanHPulitzer Such an amazing time chatting with Jovan Pulitzer today.... Please enjoy! ⭐ Countdown to Chaos (Paperback): https://t.co/kxilJB969j ⭐ Food… pic.twitter.com/edWPLn7orn — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 29, 2024 Full video player: EXCLUSIVE: Jovan Pulitzer Explains How He Caught Them All In Arizona! (Watermarked Ballots?)#DailyTruthReport@JovanHPulitzer Such an amazing time chatting with Jovan Pulitzer today.... Please enjoy! Countdown to Chaos (Paperback): https://t.co/kxilJB969j Food… pic.twitter.com/edWPLn7orn — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 29, 2024 And here are the links you need: Countdown to Chaos (Paperback): https://amzn.to/4cDlrj6 Food Forest Bible (Paperback): https://amzn.to/4coEaPU Food Forest Bible (Hardcover): https://amzn.to/4eJXqbZ Follow Jovan Pulitzer on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/JovanHuttonPulitzer It was a real blast and I hope everyone will help me share this far and wide....we all need to jump in and help before the November 2024 election.  It's our only chance. We plan to do another show in a few months and this time talk about the Invention Secrecy Act of 1952 and how much technology the government is currently hiding from us. Spoiler alert: it's a lot! Thanks for watching!

Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX), a former White House physician, provided an update on President Trump’s gunshot wound in a statement issued Saturday. “As the former appointed Physician to the President for President Donald J. Trump, I was naturally very concerned, as was the entire world, about his wellbeing after the assassination attempt on his life,” Jackson wrote. “As such, I met him in Bedminster, New Jersey, late that evening to personally check on him, and offer my assistance in any way possible,” he continued. “I have been with President Trump since that time, and I have evaluated and treated his wound daily. He is doing well. As reported and witnessed by the entire world, he sustained a gunshot wound to the right ear from a high-powered rifle used by the would be assassin,” he continued. “The bullet passed, coming less than a quarter of an inch from entering his head, and struck the top of his right ear. The bullet track produced a 2 cm wide wound that extended down to the cartilaginous surface of the ear. There was initially significant bleeding, followed by marked swelling of the entire upper ear. The swelling has since resolved, and the wound is beginning to granulate and heal properly. Based on the highly vascular nature of the ear, there is still intermittent bleeding requiring a dressing to be in place. Given the broad and blunt nature of the wound itself, no sutures were required,” he added. Read the full memo: MY FULL STATEMENT ON PRESIDENT TRUMP’S RECOVERY POST-ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT. pic.twitter.com/24OokVxfXf — Ronny Jackson (@RonnyJacksonTX) July 20, 2024 From The Hill: According to an interview published earlier this week in The New York Times, Jackson had been onboard Trump’s plane the day following the rally. He redressed Trump’s ear while flying to Wisconsin for the Republican National Convention. “The bullet took a little bit off the top of his ear in an area that, just by nature, bleeds like crazy,” Jackson told the Times. “The dressing’s bulked up a bit because you need a bit of absorbent. You don’t want to be walking around with bloody gauze on his ear.” In his first rally since the assassination attempt, Trump came out with a smaller bandage than the large white one he wore at the Republican National Convention. Trump’s big white ear bandage is gone. pic.twitter.com/OzsUaIvXzf — Keith Boykin (@keithboykin) July 20, 2024 From the New York Post: The swelling has since resolved, said Jackson, who thanked the medical staff who initially treated Trump at Butler Memorial Hospital in Pennsylvania, where he received a CT scan during his evaluation. The letter comes a day after Dr. Anthony Fauci, the controversial former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, downplayed Trump’s injuries as “superficial” and said the bullet “grazed his ear.” “I don’t think there is much more to it,” Fauci told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer Friday night. Trump, 78, dropped to the ground after gunfire from Crooks, who was perched on a rooftop, erupted while he was speaking July 13 at an outdoor campaign rally. The former commander in chief emerged surrounded by Secret Service agents with blood gushing from his right ear and has since covered the wound with a bandage in public.

Crazy Keith Olberman is an ear denier, claiming Donald Trump was not shot in the ear, and he presented no evidence. Other than watching it live and the Secret Service saying it happened, there is no evidence. Dr. Ronny Jackson came out with an official report today. Donald Trump almost died. He came less than […] The post Keith Olberman Smears DJT with the Ear Truther Lie appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Rydbeck appeared on numerous TV shows, including 'The Brady Bunch,' 'M*A*S*H,' 'Cagney & Lacey,' 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' and 'Scrubs'

'They are highly trained and skilled professionals'