by R. Cort Kirkwood, The New American: Kim Cheatle’s job at the top of the Secret Service was apparently too steep a slope on which to stand safely. After a brutal tongue-lashing before the U.S. House Oversight Committee yesterday, followed by a bipartisan demand for her resignation, the disgraced director quit her job today. Cheatle resigned her […]

from Reese Report: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Plus, orange and pink walls. READ MORE...

Everything to know about the traditional Hawaiian dish. READ MORE...

Apparently, Jenna Bush Hager's four-year-old son had quite the love affair with Wilson after meeting her on set. Continue reading…

After I posted a job opening on LinkedIn last summer for my new online journal, New Guard Press, the social media site removed the listing, citing “discrimination.” My crime? I wrote that my post sought “young writers who believe in our mission of reviving American culture.”  A label on that job posting for New Guard Press in my LinkedIn account still says it was “removed for discrimination.” I originally got the notification on July 4, 2023.   This was not the first time I had trouble with LinkedIn’s Jobs section. Two days earlier, I had received the same notification for an almost identical job posting. I appealed, asking LinkedIn to take a second look. I hoped that a more reasonable person would review the job posting, see that there was nothing remotely discriminatory about it, and return the post to the platform.   Twelve minutes after I requested a review of the earlier post, I got another email. LinkedIn confirmed that my job listing did in fact violate its “Jobs Terms and Conditions.”   After capitulating and removing the word “American” from the job description (a decision I now regret), I tried to post an entirely different job. Following this, I got an email July 7, 2023, saying that my ability to post jobs had been suspended for a week.   In August, LinkedIn banned me for another six days for “recurring violations of our Jobs Terms & Conditions and Quality Job Post Guidelines.” By this point, I had found out that LinkedIn doesn’t have accessible customer service. The only option is to direct-message LinkedIn on X (then still called Twitter), which I did after getting banned a second time.   Thirteen days later, I got a message back saying: “It looks like this has already been resolved.  Please let us know if you still experience issues.”   Keep in mind that when all of this took place, New Guard Press had not published a single article. It was barely more than an idea in the head of an 18-year-old in rural southern Ohio who wanted to build a publication for young conservatives.   Some may dismiss this incident as just a flaw in an otherwise good algorithm that keeps the LinkedIn community safe and professional. Even if that were so, LinkedIn has annual revenue north of $13 billion. If removing a job posting on the Fourth of July because it contains the word “American” is a flaw in its automated system, surely LinkedIn has the means to rapidly fix that flaw.   But more to the point, behind algorithms are human beings with ideas.   After LinkedIn removed my job posting for New Guard Press, I made a post on my personal account containing screenshots of a job posting by Planned Parenthood for a “Lead Clinician” that openly included performing abortion as part of the job description. My personal post included screenshots from a job posting by Indiana University Health titled “Academic Ob/gyn and trans/Gender Health Hybrid Position” and one from Rush University Medical Center looking for a “Gender Affirmation Advanced Practice Provider.”  LinkedIn allowed the listings for these two paid positions to remain on its website but removed my posting for an unpaid job at a new publication, New Guard Press. It’s clear that LinkedIn isn’t even pretending to be politically neutral.   “LinkedIn is not only as woke as other social media companies, but probably even more so,” The Heritage Foundation’s GianCarlo Canaparo and Daniel Cochrane wrote for The Daily Signal in April. “And it doesn’t hide it,” they added. “On the contrary, LinkedIn devotes a great deal of its resources to publicizing its ideological bias.”   LinkedIn “regularly publishes blogs touting its commitment to DEI,” Heritage’s Canaparo and Cochrane noted. “It produces hundreds of videos and classes to teach other people how important DEI is. It celebrates the DEI awards it wins from left-wing groups.”  This suggests that LinkedIn took down my job postings not because “reviving American culture” is discriminatory, but because LinkedIn discriminates against conservatives.   If LinkedIn truly wants to be a respected professional platform, it should at the very least fix its algorithms, so they don’t flag the word “American” as a form of discrimination. And if LinkedIn truly wants to be a beneficial part of the online landscape, it should do away with policies that enforce the Left’s political agenda.    The post I Got Banned by LinkedIn for Using ‘American’ in a Job Posting appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Good old Adolf. The Democrats have taken the Hitler dog out for a run so often, they’ve worn out the path. But I was surprised to hear that former President Donald Trump would pick someone as his running mate, who just eight years ago mused on Facebook that Trump was “America’s Hitler.” But yeah, Sen. J.D. Vance wrote that in 2016. I also remember, in 2016, that Vance was the darling of the Never Trump camp. I read his compelling autobiography “Hillbilly Elegy” when it came out, and found it smart, well-written, and supported with actual charts and research. I mean the book is now super-popular, literally flying off shelves. It’s been translated into Korean. You can spend $4,000 for an autographed edition. The book has a study guide. Some guy named Frank Kilgore wrote a response titled “J. D. Vance Is a Fake Hillbilly.” And, of course, our favorite director, the child actor from “The Music Man” and “Happy Days” fame, Ron Howard, directed the movie made from Vance’s book (but you gotta have NetFlix to watch it). That kind of fame inflates a man’s ego like the Grinch’s heart–three times its size. Of course, somewhere along the line, about the time when Vance decided he had political ambitions, he was struck blind on the Road to Washington. A voice came down from Heaven itself: “J.D., J.D., why do you persecute me?” It was Donald Trump, calling Vance to his destiny. By the time 2022 came around, when Vance was running for an Ohio seat in the U.S. Senate, he had fully converted to an stolen-election, J6-supporting MAGA man. Reuters reported that: “Vance has said there was no ‘Eureka’ moment that changed his views on Trump.” Oh, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale for anyone who believes that. “Rather, he gradually realized that his opposition to the former president was rooted in style rather than substance.” Vance, in his book exquisitely details his cigarette-smoking, cursing Mamaw, and his drug-addicted mother. He talks about their kind of Christianity, in which the Bible comes out between drags on her butt, but Jesus can only wonder what they find in it. And he says he had a problem with Trump’s style? Whatever. So now this Trump convert is expected to bring youth and energy to the campaign. I think the boy wonder has a long way to go. Just before Vladimir Putin unleashed war on Ukraine, Vance said “I gotta be honest with you, I really don’t care what happens to Ukraine one way or the other.” Ohio Senate candidate JD Vance in February: “I gotta be honest with you, I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or the other.” #ohsen #ohleg pic.twitter.com/SpdqQKjKmJ— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) April 15, 2022 Now, a certain wing of the MAGA movement, led by figures such as Tucker Carlson, would completely agree with this statement. Let Putin have it, they say. Trump said he’d end the war in Ukraine “immediately,” but the only way that could likely happen is if the U.S. sides with Russia. Even then, Europeans would likely fight on. There is no love lost between, say, Poland–or Finland–and Russia. Siding with Russia against our NATO allies would doom NATO. It would be dead on arrival. Perhaps that’s what some MAGA people want. It seems to be what Vance wants. But there’s a whole lot of Republicans–who vote–who don’t agree. And dealing with people who don’t agree with him is one of Vance’s weaknesses. Famed Never Trumper George Conway posted on Threads “He has that certain … ?? ?? ???? ???? … that, you know, um …. a DeSantis-like way with people.” Now, let’s take that with a swig of Mountain Dew–the clip was pooched from a Kamala Harris campaign account. But I do believe that a guy whose ego has been stretched like Joey Chestnut’s stomach might be a bit–well, arrogant–about dealing with the hoi polloi. And you know, Gov. Mike DeSantis, when he’s not coifed and primped for the cameras, is actually a fairly engaging guy. I don’t know if Vance is an engaging guy to talk to that way. I know that Trump himself was reported by NBC News to prefer Gov. Doug Burgum. His kids persuaded him to go with J.D. It was also reported that Vance was the preferred choice of Elon Musk, who has committed up to $45 million a month to help Trump win. It’s yet to be seen if Vance can dance. If he can go around the country and help convince voters that Trump is a good idea versus Kamala Harris. In certain bubbles, that question has no merit, but it will take more than certain bubbles to win the election in November. John Fogerty titled the last song on his “Centerfield” album in 1985 “Zanz Kant Danz” but then changed it to “Vanz Kant Danz.” The song, the main lyrics of which are “Vanz can’t dance, but he’ll steal your money,” was obviously a stab at record company exec Saul Zaentz, with whom Fogerty had a running feud. Zaentz sued and the case settled out of court, but other cases related to the album ended up going all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled for Fogerty regarding attorney fees. In any case, since the memes on “Vance/Dance” never seem to stop on X/Twitter, I think there’s nothing better than a good dose of the former CCR singer. Don’t blame me for the pig reference. I didn’t choose J.D. Vance as a dance partner. We’ll see if Trump made the right call. Follow Steve on Twitter @stevengberman. The First TV contributor network is a place for vibrant thought and ideas. Opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of The First or The First TV. We want to foster dialogue, create conversation, and debate ideas. See something you like or don’t like? Reach out to the author or to us at ideas@thefirsttv.com.