YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Featured Content
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
1 y ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Jordan Peterson exposes 'nightmare' of UK's blind eye to immigrant crime, censorship regime
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

‘The Trump Effect’: How Trump Wrangled Republicans And Won Mike Johnson The Speakership
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

‘The Trump Effect’: How Trump Wrangled Republicans And Won Mike Johnson The Speakership

Louisiana Republican Mike Johnson secured back-to-back terms as House speaker on Friday after President-elect Donald Trump intervened to pressure GOP holdouts. Trump began Friday prior to the speakership vote by calling House Republicans who were shaky or undecided on Johnson serving another term as speaker. By the time of the vote, only three holdouts remained, one of which, Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, had already been tallied as a loss by the Trump team. The other two holdouts, Ralph Norman of South Carolina and Keith Self of Texas, agreed to switch their votes and support Johnson after a phone meeting with Trump, according to Fox News’ Chad Pergram. South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace huddled Norman and Self in a phone meeting with Trump where the president-elect pushed them to support Johnson, arguing that extending the speakership fight would be “disrespectful to Americans.” Trump never visited with Massie, who was the lone Republican vote against Johnson. “It would be disrespectful to Americans who voted in an historic Presidential election – to have this speaker’s vote go to a second or third ballot. And it would be disrespectful to me,” Trump said, according to Pergram. “Fellas, we have a lot to do. Let’s get to it.” Self said later in a statement posted to social media that he agreed to support Johnson after “receiving firm assurances from the Speaker, that Republicans in the House will have strong representation during the budget reconciliation process — a cornerstone of President Trump’s agenda.” RE: Speaker’s Vote My sole focus was advancing the Trump agenda. To ensure this, I expressed concerns to Speaker Johnson about fiscal responsibility and holding the line on deficit spending—key priorities for my constituents. After receiving firm assurances from the Speaker,… — Rep. Keith Self (@RepKeithSelf) January 3, 2025 Norman appeared on Fox News and said that he would “do it again” the same way. “[Trump] just said, ‘Mike Johnson is the only one that’s got the support among the body to become speaker.’ And I get that. But, you know, the only way I had to let my voice be heard was what I did,” Norman said. "I'd do it again," Rep. Ralph Norman tells me after holding up Mike Johnson's speakership. A phone call from President-elect Trump led Norman to change his vote. "He just said, Mike Johnson is the only one that's got the support among the body to become speaker. And I get… pic.twitter.com/wwhGNZ2pqs — Jacqui Heinrich (@JacquiHeinrich) January 3, 2025 The Washington Examiner’s Byron York, a longtime political columnist and Hill watcher, atributed Friday’s relative lack of excitement and chaos around the speakership vote to the “Trump effect.” “Why was this Speaker election not the multi-ballot, multi-day ordeal that the McCarthy vote was in 2023? The Trump effect. The number of GOP members who were willing to stand in defiance of the president-elect’s wishes was exactly 1,” York noted. Why was this Speaker election not the multi-ballot, multi-day ordeal that the McCarthy vote was in 2023? The Trump effect. The number of GOP members who were willing to stand in defiance of the president-elect's wishes was exactly 1. pic.twitter.com/67iHeS8T1p — Byron York (@ByronYork) January 3, 2025
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 y

My Predictions For 2025
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

My Predictions For 2025

Happy New Year. It’s January, 2025, the beginning of the second quarter of the 21st century and the end of all your resolutions as you slowly sink back into a pear-shaped blob careening into oblivion like George Clooney in “Gravity” but without the paycheck. So after you’ve canceled that gym membership and put all your new workout gear on eBay, let’s gather together around the crystal ball of the imagination while I pretend to gaze into the future so I can make ridiculous predictions that I hope you’ll forget by the time I get around to claiming I was right about everything. In politics, I predict that Donald Trump will take office January 20, and on Day One, he’ll reduce corruption in government eighty percent by not being Joe Biden. I predict that on Day One, Trump will issue a blanket pardon of half the J6 demonstrators. The other half, who are undercover FBI agents, will be put in prison where they belong. And I predict that on Day One, Trump will issue a declaration that there are only two genders, and that men are the ones with testicles, unless they’re Republicans in the House of Representatives. In journalism, I predict ABC will fire George Stephanopoulos for intimidating women into silence until they realize that’s why they hired him in the first place, then he’ll be rehired and assigned to “The View.” I predict that CNN will double its viewership when an old man in Milwaukee forgets how to use his remote. And I predict that the New York Times will save space by publishing nothing but Trump emojis followed by crap emojis followed by crying emojis, until the paper is so simplistic and repetitive it can be written by A.I. but without the I, so it’s just A, as in “A, this paper sucks, cancel my subscription.” WATCH: The Andrew Klavan Show In the culture, I predict the Disney company will hire an armed security force to hunt down every last person who still occasionally feels inspired or delighted or even mildly entertained by a “Star Wars” movie and compel them to watch movies with unattractive lesbians in baggy clothes having totally absurd sword fights until the viewers confess there is no such thing as a god-like Force or Jedis or manhood and that everything is meaningless and they’re sorry they ever liked “Star Wars” in the first place and we should all just die. I predict that a starlet will show up at a French film festival wearing a completely transparent dress, and a news site will describe the outfit as “shocking” even though no one is shocked or even particularly interested. I predict June will be gay pride month, yet, in a stunning paradox, the entire month will pass without a single person feeling proud of being gay, although there will be a general sense of relief when it’s finally July and we can just drop the entire subject which has been making everyone feel oppressively uncomfortable. Finally, I predict that in December, a pear-shaped man will go on eBay to buy some good-as-new workout gear and discover he has sent his money to himself and now has to dig the gear out of the closet and mail it to himself so he can put it on eBay. Those are my 2025 predictions. * * * This excerpt is taken from the opening satirical monologue of “The Andrew Klavan Show.” Andrew Klavan is the host of “The Andrew Klavan Show” at The Daily Wire. He is the bestselling author of the Cameron Winter Mystery series. The fourth installment, “A WOMAN UNDERGROUND,” is now available. Follow him on X: @andrewklavan The views expressed in this satirical article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 y

Baskin-Robbins Kicks Off 2025 With A New & Exciting Flavor
Favicon 
www.inspiremore.com

Baskin-Robbins Kicks Off 2025 With A New & Exciting Flavor

For many people, January just drags. After the mad rush of the holidays, it seems like there’s not much to do at the beginning of the year, and we’re not sure what exactly we have to look forward to next. Not to worry, friends. Baskin-Robbins has us all covered. The ice cream shop’s first flavor of the month for 2025 is here and it sounds great. According to a news release, for their Cinnamon Roll ice cream, “We’re putting a flavorful twist on a classic bakery favorite.” View this post on Instagram A post shared by Baskin-Robbins (@baskinrobbins) Baskin-Robbins Is Very Excited About The New Flavor The new flavor aims to give fans a chance to enjoy the cinnamony goodness without having to turn on their oven. “Our Flavor Experts have transformed your fave pastry into a delicious and cozy ice cream. Cinnamon Roll is made with real cinnamon and features cinnamon roll ice cream, dough pieces and gooey cinnamon cream cheese-flavored swirls. Each pink spoonful is like a warm hug—and it’s just as dreamy in our signature Milkshakes,” Baskin-Robbins explains. Additionally, fans can join the Baskin-Robbins Rewards program to earn free ice cream. Anyone new to the program who signs up now can earn a free scoop and try the Cinnamon Roll ice cream themselves. The company teased the new release with some delectable-looking pics on Instagram and Facebook. One pic reads, “Leave no crumbs.” Baskin-Robbins fans are ready. A follower wrote on Facebook, “I tried it yesterday in sample and WOW, it’s sooooo good! It’s my second time trying breakfast-themed ice cream! This person can’t wait to try it, “I just try it I love cinnamon rolls.” This person loved it, “I tried it yesterday in milkshake and it’s sooooo good, even though it’s sweet!” So did this one, “Yeah, it’s wonderful flavor! I love cinnamon flavor!” This story’s featured image is by Robert Way via Shutterstock. The post Baskin-Robbins Kicks Off 2025 With A New & Exciting Flavor appeared first on InspireMore.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

Soldier In Las Vegas Cybertruck Explosion Appears To Have Had PTSD, Heavy Guilt, Police Say
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Soldier In Las Vegas Cybertruck Explosion Appears To Have Had PTSD, Heavy Guilt, Police Say

'I needed to cleanse my mind'
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 y

‘Fantasy Land Of Hotbed Anti-Trumpism’: Former Prosecutor Raises Eyebrows At Trump’s Sentencing, Calls It A Disgrace
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

‘Fantasy Land Of Hotbed Anti-Trumpism’: Former Prosecutor Raises Eyebrows At Trump’s Sentencing, Calls It A Disgrace

'Absolutely ridiculous case'
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 y

'I Think It's Over': Sixth Circuit Kills Biden Attempt to Control Internet
Favicon 
hotair.com

'I Think It's Over': Sixth Circuit Kills Biden Attempt to Control Internet

'I Think It's Over': Sixth Circuit Kills Biden Attempt to Control Internet
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Resigning Anti-Free Speech Meta Exec Babbles About ‘Transparency,’ ‘Accountability’
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Resigning Anti-Free Speech Meta Exec Babbles About ‘Transparency,’ ‘Accountability’

A Meta executive who leaves a legacy of censorship hypocritically pontificated about “transparency,” “accountability” and the pride he has in his work as a top executive with the election-interfering platforms. Months after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg finally admitted to censoring Americans’ free speech after government pressure, global policy chief Nick Clegg is stepping down, and he seems to have no regrets about Meta’s lack of transparency and censorship under his watch. In a thread on X Jan. 2, Clegg thanked Zuckerberg and former Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg for taking him on at the company and even attempted to prop up his incoming replacement Joel Kaplan. Read the full blog on MRC Free Speech America’s site.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

KJP Ducks This Simple Question From Fox’s Tomlinson in First Briefing of 2025
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

KJP Ducks This Simple Question From Fox’s Tomlinson in First Briefing of 2025

The Biden White House snuck in a press briefing Friday afternoon amid the House speaker vote hullabaloo and it had the predictable tone of senioritis with networks reaching deep into their bench for correspondents and producers willing to listen to Karine Jean-Pierre stammer and stumble her way through process questions about Biden’s final days in office, Biden blocking the sale of U.S. Steel, and the Islamic terror attack in New Orleans. Thankfully, Fox’s Lucas Tomlinson came ready with a probing question, but Jean-Pierre chose to ignore it: KJP ducked this question from Fox’s @LucasFoxNews Tomlinson as she left the Briefing Room: “Does the President still consider white supremacy the greatest terrorist threat to the United States?” pic.twitter.com/fDdWGB0n4x — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) January 3, 2025 The comments in question Tomlinson was referring? Here was Biden on 1, 2021 in Tulsa, Oklahoma: “According to the intelligence community, terrorism from white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today. Not ISIS, not Al-Qaeda, white supremacists.” Biden also made the claim on October 21, 2021 at the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial in Washington D.C.: “According to the United States intelligence community, domestic terrorism from white supremacists is the most lethal terrorist threat in the homeland.” He also said this on May 13, 2021 at Howard University’s commencement: “The most dangerous threat to our homeland is white supremacy.” A few minutes earlier, we were subjected to this softball from the left by a CNN producer: “President Biden has staked his presidency on the preservation of democracy and has commemorated January 6th in different ways every year. What, if anything, will he do to commemorate the anniversary on Monday and in that context, does he still believe Donald Trump is a threat to democracy?” NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell also had to make part of her turn with Jean-Pierre about Donald Trump, seeming to suggest Biden should do something about the level of intelligence access afforded to the President-Elect (click “expand”): O’DONNELL: President-Elect Trump had communicated on his social media some inaccurate information related to New Orleans early on. Is the President at all concerned about the flow of information and briefing and access to whatever intelligence or whatever he might need in terms of this transition. Are you — is he comfortable with the information flow to the President-Elect on matters like this? JEAN-PIERRE: I mean, look, and I'm actually glad you asked this question because one of the things that you all do as a — uh — um — a journalist — journalist body is that you were able to fact check and say that what was stated — uh — the President-Elect was — uh — simply false, and I think that is important — right — which is why we respect — uh — uh — the — the hard work that all of you do. As it relates to the President and the information that he gets, obviously that's something for ODNI if it's — if it's related to intelligence and specific information in that nature. I'm not going to speculate beyond that and I'm just going to leave it there. On the more productive front, CBS sent Homeland Security & Justice reporter Nicole Sganga and she was the only reporter to ask about the Chinese hack of the Treasury Department: CBS’s @NicoleSganga: “[T]here have been reports that Chinese government hackers have reached a really sensitive office within the U.S. Treasury. OFAC, of course, administers economic sanctions. What more can you tell us about the scope of this and what information has been… pic.twitter.com/H39Cifk0AS — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) January 3, 2025 Most of the questions concerned Biden’s block of Japanese steelmaker Nippon from buying U.S. Steel (which had bipartisan support, including from Trump). NPR’s Franco Ordoñez asked two important questions about whether Biden would feel responsible if U.S. Steel turns around and lays off workers and/or shutters factories (click “expand”): ORDOÑEZ: U.S. Steel has warned that that it may or likely would have to close steel mills if the deal fell through. To what degree did the President take that into consideration? JEAN-PIERRE: So, I can say this, that we are confident — the President is confident that — uh — domestic steel and domestic steel workers are going to continue to thrive because of the work that he's done, because of the commitment that he has had to — uh — to — uh — to this industry. As I said at the top, this is the strongest — it is — it’s in its strongest — the steel industry is the stronger than that it's been in years because of what the President has been able to do, and you think about manufacturing investment. You think about tariffs on Chinese steel imports. That’s [sic] has made the industry stronger, those actions that the President has taken. You see more than 100 new steel and iron mills have opened since the President took office, so we're very confident that this is an industry that's going to continue to thrive. ORDOÑEZ: If — if there are — if there are mills that are closed, if there are layoffs, would the president need to take some responsibility for that? JEAN-PIERRE: I — I mean, that's — that's a hypothetical. I'm not going to get into hypotheticals. What I can say is the President has taken strong actions over the last four years. I just mentioned 100 new steel mills that were created. What he was able to do on Chinese steel imports — tariffs on Chinese steel imports that has made — uh — made that industry stronger, manufacturing investments, all of that has made that industry stronger and so, we believe it's going to continue to thrive. I'm not going to get into a hypertheticals [sic] from here. Obviously, the President — uh — took — took this decision — uh — really — uh — you know, he — he really took it seriously — uh — and made a decision on behalf of — on behalf of the American people, and that's how he came to this decision. Obviously, this is a President that has had a lot of — a lot of focus and wanting to continue to make sure we uplifted — uh — certainly union workers, and that's what you've seen from this President. To see the relevant transcript from the January 3 briefing (including O’Donnell’s questions to Jean-Pierre about U.S. Steel), click here.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 y

‘Goodbye’: If your man does this, it’s time to go
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

‘Goodbye’: If your man does this, it’s time to go

Times have changed, and in terms of relationships — it hasn’t been for the better. Women everywhere are finding themselves growing older while their long-term partners are failing to get down on one knee and commit, and one recent post on X brought this glaring and painful issue into the spotlight. “I have a friend who has been in a relationship for five years. She is 32 now, he is 35. He says that he loves her but doesn’t feel ready to move in or commit. Thoughts?” Italian journalist Alessandra Bocchi posted on X. Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” has some advice. “I will say that I am not really in the business of telling people that I do not know to break up,” Stuckey begins. “There are a lot of different details and different nuances in people’s relationships. There could be different caveats, different circumstances.” “But this person asked, in general, what are your thoughts about this situation. And from the information that we have, someone who is 32 and 35, they’ve been dating for five years, she doesn’t give any extenuating circumstances or reasons other than he doesn’t feel ready to move in or commit,” she continues. “Based on that knowledge, I am saying goodbye. Goodbye. You break up with him, and you move on. No, no, no. He is a man-child at this point. There is a failure to launch. There is something going on here, and there is no innocuous good reason, no justification, no valid excuse for him not to commit,” she adds. While women, often blinded by the love they feel for someone in a relationship, will psychoanalyze the situation and find reasons for their man’s refusal to commit — the real reason is much simpler. “It is usually that he simply does not want to. Because the phrase is true,” Stuckey concludes, “If he wanted to, he would.” Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 64348 out of 120384
  • 64344
  • 64345
  • 64346
  • 64347
  • 64348
  • 64349
  • 64350
  • 64351
  • 64352
  • 64353
  • 64354
  • 64355
  • 64356
  • 64357
  • 64358
  • 64359
  • 64360
  • 64361
  • 64362
  • 64363
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund