At the start of the year‚ President Joe Biden announced an indefinite ban on liquified natural gas exports (LNG) out of supposed concern for the environment. The U.S.‚ however‚ is the leading producer of oil and natural gas and also the leading exporter of LNG. So‚ ironically‚ in pausing LNG exports in an effort to reduce emissions‚ the Biden administration—and the radical environmentalists who pushed for this ban—have cleared the way for another less environmentally conscious actor‚ like Russia‚ to take over U.S. market share. American energy leadership is not only good for our nation‚ but good for the global environment.  Rather than continue to wage war on American energy production and push unworkable regulations on everyday Americans‚ this Earth Day the Biden administration should do the environment a favor by unlocking domestic energy production so the U.S. can continue to be the world leader in responsibly producing oil and gas.  More than a half century ago‚ a grassroots movement celebrated the first Earth Day in order to raise awareness of the need to take better care of the environment and the abundant natural resources with which our nation is blessed. These pioneering environmentalists began a trend of reversing grim statistics about the state of the environment‚ so I imagine that they would be proud to learn that‚ over a 20-year period‚ total gross U.S. emissions decreased by 3%. What might shock them—and contemporary environmentalists—is that this was achieved while U.S. oil and gas production increased and reached historic levels.   In step with population growth and increased technology use‚ U.S. energy consumption has increased by 123% since 1960‚ but domestic energy production has kept pace—increasing by 140% since 1960. Since 2005 alone‚ U.S. energy production increased by 48%. This is significant since during the same period‚ net emissions decreased by 16.6%. Contrary to what many may believe and propagate‚ oil and gas production doesn’t necessarily result in increased emissions or harms to the environment.  Results like this are possible in the U.S.‚ but not guaranteed elsewhere. China’s carbon dioxide emissions‚ for example‚ increased by 93.9% since 2005. U.S. energy producers take great care to produce oil and gas in a clean and responsible fashion. American innovation has allowed them to discover new ways to produce more oil‚ but with less waste and pollution.  Many of our competitors in the energy market‚ like China and Russia‚ take the opposite approach and have little to no regard for the environment‚ emissions‚ or the impact on their citizens. So when the U.S. pulls back from a segment of the global energy market‚ as with Biden’s recent prohibition on LNG exports‚ less responsible‚ less environmentally conscious actors step in.  Instead‚ to really champion stewardship of the environment and our resources and lower emissions‚ the U.S. should be the global leader in energy production. Not only would this be good for the environment‚ but it would be good for our national security and our pocketbooks. A robust supply of domestic energy protects us from the whims of foreign states who may wish to withhold exports. And a less constrained market would drive down prices for U.S. consumers—something we all desperately need. When the U.S. leads‚ good things happen for our country and the world—and in this case‚ the environment. It is wishful thinking to suppose that simply limiting our own energy production will lead to lower emissions and a healthier environment. Rather‚ whatever market share we give up is then taken up by someone who almost certainly is less environmentally conscious in how they produce energy.  If we want to give the Earth a gift this Earth Day‚ we should build on our successes of the past two decades‚ which increased energy production while lowering emissions‚ and unlock domestic energy production so we can responsibly lead the world in energy production. The post To Celebrate Earth Day‚ Celebrate American Energy Leadership appeared first on The Daily Signal.

A dust storm of political madness is brewing in Phoenix as Grand Canyon University faces the continued threats of Education Secretary Miguel Cardona. Christians have watched as the Biden administration attacks biblical views left and right‚ with a particularly vehement disregard for the sanctity of life and marriage. As such‚ it can’t be too surprising that Cardona‚ a part of this leftist administration‚ has vowed to shut down America’s largest Christian university. In late October‚ Grand Canyon University was hit with “a $37.7 million fine brought by the federal government over allegations that it lied to students about the cost of its programs‚” The Associated Press reported—an accusation that GCU President Brian Mueller described as “ridiculous.” Around the same time‚ Liberty University‚ America’s second-largest Christian university‚ also was fined $37 million “over alleged underreporting of crimes.” Grand Canyon University appealed its fine in November even though a hearing is not expected until January 2025. But the question Mueller has is one of integrity. Is this genuine consideration for the well-being of students‚ or is this a targeted attack against religious institutions&;#63; “It’s interesting‚ isn’t it‚ that the two largest Christian universities in the country‚ this one and Liberty University‚ are both being fined almost the identical amount at almost the identical time&;#63;” GCU’s president speculated in a speech. “Now is there a cause and effect there&;#63; I don’t know. But it’s a fact.” The House Appropriations Committee held a hearing early this month about the Biden administration’s decision to “crack down on GCU and other universities like it.” During the proceedings‚ Cardona and Rep. Rosa DeLauro‚ D-Conn.‚ made their disapproval of Grand Canyon University and similar universities obvious. “[W]e are cracking down not only to shut them down‚ but to send a message to not prey on students‚” Cardona said. Supporters of GCU agree that the fine seems unprecedented and motivated by ideological bias. American Principles Project Policy Director Jon Schweppe said: “The federal government’s education agenda is punishing schools that do not conform to their progressive ideology. It’s time we take a stand against this egregious abuse of power.” Another conservative think tank‚ the Goldwater Institute‚ sued the Education Department for “refusing to turn over” public documents “that explain why” the agency fined GCU. The goal of the lawsuit is to unmask the reason behind the fine. “With its motto of ‘private‚ Christian‚ affordable’ and its track record of graduating students into high-demand and high-paying jobs‚ GCU is a success story by any metric. And it stands apart from universities across the country that are facing declining enrollment‚ that are indoctrinating students with radical politics‚ and that are under attack for failing to defend the First Amendment‚” the Goldwater Institute wrote. “So then why are the feds targeting GCU‚ a popular university that seems to be doing everything right&;#63; That’s exactly what we’re going to find out.” Although immense uncertainty still surrounds this case‚ Grand Canyon University’s president took the time to share with The Washington Stand how his staff‚ faculty‚ and students are fairing and how believers everywhere can help. Mueller emphasized that GCU has faced various issues over the years. But despite the government’s action‚ he said he wanted people to know that “interestingly enough … it has had zero impact on anything that we’re doing.” He continued: “The enrollments are just continuing to grow … [and] the morale is very high in terms of our faculty and staff. The campus is extremely vibrant. I mean‚ the students absolutely love this place. They’re extremely loyal to [the school] and so we just keep marching through it.” And although the fine that Grand Canyon University was dealt by the Education Department is “a problem‚” Mueller said‚ he is thankful that GCU remains optimistic. Christian “mission‚ not politics‚ is our motivation and it is our hope‚” he told The Washington Stand. As a university‚ Mueller explained‚ GCU exists to “pour into” the community around it. “[O]ur reach into the neighborhood and caring for disadvantaged populations has been a way to live out our faith” in a way “that has risen above … political divide‚” Mueller said. Ultimately‚ with support from “both sides of the aisle” in Arizona‚ he noted‚ “all the issues we have are with a very small number of people in Washington D.C.” “We encourage people to be involved politically and vote‚” Mueller said‚ adding: “But our faith will stand above the politics always‚ and our politics will never become our religion.” Because‚ for “many people in our country today‚ their politics have become their religion‚ and that’s when things … go really bad in our society‚” he said. Mueller pointed out that Grand Canyon University is “trying to be an example of a Christian community that can rise above those things and focus on helping people” through service‚ as Scripture calls believers to do. Mueller concluded with a request for prayer as the university works through these troubling times‚ and for “the hearts of certain people in Washington‚ D.C. to be softened.” He added that “it’s hard to make progress and resolve differences when people just … don’t want to talk to each other.” Published originally by The Washington Stand The post Largest Christian University in America Gets Fined $37 Million. Coincidence or Targeted Attack&;#63; appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The Supreme Court heard oral argument Monday in the case of City of Grants Pass v. Johnson‚ which raises the issue of how states and localities may deal with the problem of homelessness. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held that it violates the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment for a city (in this case‚ Grants Pass‚ Oregon) to fine someone for sleeping on public property if no bed is available at a secular shelter. After Monday’s argument‚ it seems likely that the high court will reverse the lower court’s decision. In its ruling‚ the 9th Circuit relied on two Supreme Court decisions: Robinson v. California‚ which held that a state can’t criminalize the status of being a narcotics addict‚ and Powell v. Texas‚ which held that a state may outlaw being drunk in public. The 9th Circuit read those decisions as prohibiting the government from making it a crime to engage in involuntary conduct and concluded that succumbing to sleep is about as involuntary an act as anyone can undertake. Homelessness is a serious national problem. Sometimes it is caused by a transient economic misfortune that is not the fault of the displaced individual‚ such as losing a job because an employer’s business closed. On other occasions‚ homelessness results from the inability to hold a job because of poor life choices‚ such as abusing controlled substances. In each instance‚ a party might be forced out of his home because he no longer can pay his rent or mortgage‚ but the nature of the reason is quite different. Moreover‚ there is a material difference between one or two isolated homeless parties and an entire encampment of homeless individuals. Both scenarios pose risks to third parties‚ but the latter is far worse. The difference is like the difference between a sprinkle of rain and a monsoon. How to address the problem of homelessness arouses passion on each side. Advocates for the homeless argue that the government has a legal and moral obligation to ensure that everyone has a decent place to live‚ which means that the state must allow the homeless to sleep on public property if no other space is available. Citizens argue that they‚ too‚ are entitled to a decent place to live‚ and the government must be able to protect the quality of life they enjoy in urban‚ suburban‚ or rural neighborhoods against the drug use‚ crime‚ and squalor surrounding homeless encampments. Local governments are caught in the middle. They must prioritize how to spend limited funds while trying to satisfy the competing needs of local constituencies. Unfortunately‚ the 9th Circuit short-circuited the legislative process by making up—yes‚ I meant exactly that; the court willfully made it up—a constitutional right for the homeless to sleep in a public park if no public or private nonsectarian beds are available. That quite astonishing ruling attracted the attention of the Supreme Court‚ which agreed to hear the case. Dozens of parties filed amicus briefs in the Grants Pass case on one side or the other. Three parties argued in the Supreme Court. Theana Evangelis argued on behalf of the city of Grants Pass‚ contending that the 9th Circuit misread the Eighth Amendment. Edwin Kneedler‚ a seasoned veteran in the Justice Department’s Office of the Solicitor General‚ argued on behalf of the United States. Kelsi Brown Corkran argued on behalf of the plaintiff class of homeless people. Oral argument lasted for two and a half hours‚ so the justices and lawyers covered a great deal of ground. Evangelis argued that the 9th Circuit had “constitutionalized” the responses of local governments that were trying to deal with a thorny public policy issue‚ adding that the appeals court had “tied the city’s hand.”  She seemed afraid to follow this argument to its logical conclusion‚ however.  Evangelis could have responded “Yes” to hypothetical questions such as: “Could the city make it a crime to be homeless‚ even if all that someone did was to stand at a bus stop&;#63;” Or “Could the city make it a crime to eat in public‚ because someone could not afford to eat in a restaurant&;#63;” After all‚ the Eighth Amendment was adopted when there were only 13 states bundled along the Eastern Seaboard. At the time‚ there was a vast unknown amount of westward space for someone to try to make a living off the land. No one imagined that the government had the responsibility to provide shelter for anyone. While Evangelis’ arguments could have been stronger‚ especially in the face of tough questions from the Supreme Court’s three liberal justices‚ several of the other six justices appeared to be on her side. Justice Brett Kavanaugh‚ for instance‚ expressed a desire to “avoid the need for having to constitutionalize an area and have a federal judge superintend this rather than the local community.”  And Chief Justice John Roberts rightfully noted that “municipalities have competing priorities‚” wondering: “Why would you think that these nine people [himself and the other eight justices] are the best people to judge and weigh those policy judgments&;#63;” Kneedler tried to refocus the justices’ attention by claiming that Grants Pass effectively sought to banish people from its jurisdiction but arguing that cities such as Grants Pass should have some flexibility in implementing reasonable restrictions on time‚ place‚ and manner to address homelessness. Several justices‚ most notably Justice Neil Gorsuch‚ appeared skeptical. They expressed concern that if the court were to adopt Kneedler’s position‚ local governments couldn’t effectively address the problem of dealing with mentally ill persons or drug addicts‚ particularly those who refuse to enter shelters‚ or for that matter the problem of public defecation. At the end of the day‚ Kneedler likely did not change many minds. Appearing last‚ Corkran argued that the Grants Pass ordinance is indistinguishable from one that makes it a crime to be homeless‚ because everyone must fall asleep eventually and a homeless person can’t do so in Grants Pass without being cited for violating the law. The result‚ she said‚ is that Grants Pass imposes a “24/7 citywide sleeping ban that forces its homeless residents to either move to another jurisdiction or face endless punishment.” Corkran and Roberts batted around answers to the question of whether “homelessness” is a “status” because it can be changed by giving someone a place to sleep. She said that it was‚ but Roberts expressed the view that being a homeless person was no more a “status” than being a bank robber because conduct is involved. Corkran doggedly adhered to her basic position and avoided being caught in logic traps. Nonetheless‚ she also probably did not win any votes from justices that she didn’t already have. At the end of the day‚ a clear majority of the nine Supreme Court justices seemed unwilling to embrace the 9th Circuit’s broad ruling that the Eighth Amendment effectively required localities to find a place for the homeless to stay. The high court will have to work out exactly what its opinion will say‚ and what its rationale will be‚ during the time remaining in the October 2023 term. The post Be It Ever So Humble … : Supreme Court to Decide If City May Ban Sleeping in Public appeared first on The Daily Signal.

'This Isn't a Tinder Date.' You Don't Have to Like Trump to Vote For Him

Prison Apologizes to Rapist for Misgendering Him

More on the Chinese Doping Scandal

The video introduces us‚ a dog with a personality that’s just as colorful as her escapades. She is not just any pet; she is a vibrant character in her own right. From her notorious trips to the neighbor’s house to her expressive grunts and snarfs when fetched‚ each scene shows the lengths of how far... The post Dog dishes out ‘teenage temper tantrum’ when she’s caught sneaking off to neighbors house appeared first on Animal Channel.

Since late January of 2012‚ the Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard has once a week featured a “Mainstream Media Scream” selection in his “Washington Secrets” column. For each pick‚ usually posted online on Monday‚ I provide an explanation and recommend a “scream” rating (scale of one to five). This post contains the “Liberal Media Screams” starting in January 2023. &;gt; For 2021 and 2022‚ for all of 2020. For all of 2019. For all of  2018. (Re-named “Liberal Media Scream” as of June 11‚ 2018.) “Mainstream Media Screams” for: &;gt; July-December 2017 posts; January through June 2017; July to December 2016; for January to June 2016; for July to December 2015; for January to June 2015. (2012-2014 are featured on MRC.org: For 2014; for June 17‚ 2013 through the end of 2013. And for January 31‚ 2012 through June 11‚ 2013.) Check Bedard’s “Washington Secrets” blog for the latest choice and his other Washington insider posts. Each week‚ this page will be updated with Bedard’s latest example of the worst bias of the week. (For more of the worst liberal media bias‚ browse the Media Research Center's Notable Quotables with compilations of the latest outrageous‚ sometimes humorous‚ quotes in the liberal media.)   â–  New on April 22: Liberal Media Scream: Historian Meacham says ‘patriotism’ demands Biden win See the posting on the Washington Examiner's site where you can watch the video and read Baker's assessment. A week later‚ Bedard's article will be posted here.   â–  April 15: No Liberal Media Scream this week.   â–  April 8: Liberal Media Scream: Joy Reid wants prison‚ not airport‚ named for Trump (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream revealed again just how easy it is to make cable TV hosts suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome” go nuts. With Congress on Easter break‚ there wasn’t much Capitol Hill news last week. So when a report was posted about a GOP proposal to rename Dulles International Airport after former President Donald Trump‚ MSBNC turned all its guns on the idea. On the ReidOut‚ host Joy Reid said it was bad enough that the “worst” airport in America is named after Eisenhower-era Secretary of State John Foster Dulles. “Let’s make it worse” by naming it for Trump‚ she said. Instead‚ she suggested that Trump’s name be put on a Miami prison‚ a reference to the legal cases he faces‚ one in Florida. She and her guests‚ including Ali Velshi and Fordham University professor Christina Greer‚ piled on. Greer even bashed Washington’s national airport being renamed after former President Ronald Reagan. Reid said‚ “Yeah‚ I just call it ‘DCA.'” From Friday’s The ReidOut on MSNBC: JOY REID: Let’s talk a little about this idea of renaming Dulles. Now‚ Dulles is not the best airport — it might be the worst airport in America. The Republicans are like‚ “Let’s name it after Donald Trump.” I love the fact that it’s named after one of the most diabolical secretaries of state who destroyed Iran and a bunch of Central America. ALI VELSHI: But let’s make that worse. REID: Let’s make it worse. Also‚ the Democrats have said‚ “Instead‚ let’s name a prison after Trump.” Thoughts&;#63; Thoughts&;#63; Thoughts&;#63; Name a prison in Miami&;#63; VELSHI: That is a fantastic idea. … REID: I think this is a great opportunity for the nerds at the table just to talk about Allen Dulles and also his brother — it was John Foster Dulles‚ I think‚ and Allen Dulles‚ and both of them were involved in destroying Guatemala and Iran. VELSHI: Yeah. REID: So I feel like that’s important‚ and that’s given me the opportunity‚ so‚ thank you‚ Republicans. CHRISTINA GREER: Well‚ I mean‚ we’ve — they’ve already renamed National‚ Reagan‚ which I refuse to call it. REID: Yeah‚ I just call it “DCA.“ Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explained our weekly pick: “Glad something about Trump made them laugh‚ a brief break from the usual full hour of irrational anger at any mention of anything Trump. Naturally‚ Reid couldn’t hide how her contempt for Republicans goes way beyond just Trump. It’s a disdain so deep she’s still mad about Ronald Reagan getting an airport named for him and the foreign policy of a president who left office more than 60 years ago.” Rating: THREE out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  April 1: Liberal Media Scream: Top editor joins CNN host in ripping MAGA with their ‘truth’ (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream is a rare but deserved five-screamer in which the editor of the Cleveland Plain Dealer joins with a CNN host to condemn former President Donald Trump and his MAGA followers. Appearing on CNN This Morning with Kasie Hunt‚ editor Chris Quinn explained why he wrote a weekend letter to readers about the paper’s anti-Trump coverage. He said‚ “These are people that watch Fox News or Newsmax and they believe it because they — it appears credible. Then they come to our platforms and see the opposite and they’re conflicted because they like us. They read us for the sports coverage or the local news‚ or what have you.” Quinn added‚ “This was for them. I had to‚ I owed them some sort of an explanation. And the reason it was so difficult is I don’t want to demean them. I don’t want to criticize them. But I can’t stray from the truth. The truth is this guy is a monster. He’s the worst president in history and many people understand that. Those who get their news from not credible sources believe what they’re hearing.” Hunt said‚ “You said — another piece of this to your point of what the truth is‚ you said‚ ‘Trust your eyes. Trump‚ on Jan. 6‚ launched the most serious threat to our system of government since the Civil War. You know that. You saw it.’ And just before that you write‚ ‘This is not subjective. We all saw it. Plenty of leaders today try to convince the masses we did not see what we saw but our eyes don’t deceive us.'” “And I think that this is the piece of it that gets me because I was there on that day and I looked out the window and I saw these people trying to attack the Capitol. And then‚ now‚ half of these political leaders are trying to say no‚ actually‚ that thing that you saw with your own eyes did not happen.” From today’s CNN This Morning with Kasie Hunt: KASIE HUNT: How to cover former President Donald Trump is — quite literally — one of the hardest‚ thorniest questions facing us as journalists. It is something that I think about quite literally every single day when I wake up to join all of you. And it is especially true in the wake of Jan. 6‚ which affected me both personally and professionally in addition to‚ of course‚ having enormous implications for our democracy. This is why this all stood out to me. The Cleveland Plain Dealer decided they wanted to address this with their readers head-on over the weekend. The editor‚ Chris Quinn‚ writes this: “The north star here is truth. We tell the truth‚ even when it offends some of the people who pay us for information. The truth is that Donald Trump undermined faith in our elections in his false bid to retain the presidency. He sparked an insurrection intended to overthrow our government and keep himself in power. No president in our history has done worse.” And joining me now is Chris Quinn. He is the editor of the Plain Dealer and Cleveland.com. Chris‚ thank you so much for being here. It’s an honor to have you. CHRIS QUINN: Good morning. HUNT: So I loved how you approached this because you started with your readers — with the people who write to you about this. Many of them‚ of course‚ are supporters of Donald Trump. And you write some of them are more thoughtful than others‚ shall I say. But this is something that I have wrestled with because there are so many people in the country who support Donald Trump and many of them have reasons for doing that that have to do with the circumstances that they face. We don’t want to lose empathy for those people. We don’t want to not speak to those people. To be‚ you know‚ advocates and helpful in terms of providing those people with information. But you sat down and you grappled with this question‚ and you tried to explain why you’re doing what you’re doing in the way that you’re doing it. Can you explain a little bit more of that to all of us right now&;#63; QUINN: Yeah. This was a very challenging piece to write. It actually took me almost six months to get my thoughts together. I get two kinds of correspondence from Trump supporters and one is not nice. It’s very condescending and sneering. And I kind of chalk that up to people who had felt left out of society. Donald Trump gave them a club to participate in. And there’s nothing I can say or do to help them understand what we’re doing. But the other half write me with great courtesy and implore me for an explanation. They say‚ “You are dismissing a large segment of the country when you say that Donald Trump is the monster you describe him as and I don’t see him that way. What do you say to me&;#63;” These are people that watch Fox News or Newsmax and they believe it because they — it appears credible. Then they come to our platforms and see the opposite and they’re conflicted because they like us. They read us for the sports coverage or the local news‚ or what have you. So this was for them. I had to‚ I owed them some sort of an explanation. And the reason it was so difficult is I don’t want to demean them. I don’t want to criticize them. But I can’t stray from the truth. The truth is this guy is a monster. He’s the worst president in history and many people understand that. Those who get their news from not credible sources believe what they’re hearing. HUNT: Yeah. I will just say I think that the decline in our local media is a crisis for many‚ many reasons‚ but not least is that you‚ as a local paper‚ have a level of trust with people in your communities that is simply not possible to establish when you are a national news organization. And I think that really comes through in this piece that you wrote. And you said — another piece of this to your point of what the truth is‚ you said‚ “Trust your eyes. Trump‚ on Jan. 6‚ launched the most serious threat to our system of government since the Civil War. You know that. You saw it.” And just before that you write‚ “This is not subjective. We all saw it. Plenty of leaders today try to convince the masses we did not see what we saw but our eyes don’t deceive us.” And I think that this is the piece of it that gets me because I was there on that day and I looked out the window and I saw these people trying to attack the Capitol. And then‚ now‚ half of these political leaders are trying to say no‚ actually‚ that thing that you saw with your own eyes did not happen. Was it that that really was the thing that underscored this the most to you as well&;#63; QUINN: Yeah. And look‚ it’s heartbreaking what you’re seeing today. I come from a state where we’ve had senators like George Voinovich and John Glenn — people who would never have stood by during these recent years and allowed what’s happened to happen. And today‚ we have J.D. Vance and we might have Bernie Moreno‚ whose claim to fame is they want to be puppets for Donald Trump. And it’s not what we should be about. And that’s why I referenced that New Yorker piece in what I wrote because the New Yorker had a book review that looked back and said the reason Hitler came to the fore wasn’t because a bunch of people went and voted to have a fascist leader. It was because the people in government‚ in trying to get power for themselves‚ appeased him and that allowed him to rise. That’s what we have going on. Everybody knows what the truth is. The people in Congress were there. They were under threat from it. But for expedience‚ they’re denying it happened. HUNT: Do you think that those people who are looking to enable Donald Trump‚ as you say‚ what is the — their level of culpability here&;#63; I mean‚ obviously‚ you talk about Trump‚ himself‚ and his‚ the actions that he takes and his role in trying to hang on to power. But these enablers‚ I mean‚ what responsibility do they bear&;#63; QUINN: I think they have full responsibility. I think journalists who veer from the truth are going to end up having full responsibility. Look‚ we’re a regional newsroom and we’re doing well. We’re actually one of the local newsrooms that’s kind of figured it out and we’re thriving and we’re not in any danger of going away. But we have our limited influence. And so‚ we’re doing what we can. We’re‚ you know‚ we ask ourselves what’s the right thing to do here&;#63; The right thing to do is to call this out‚ not to say there’s two sides to Donald Trump. There aren’t two sides to Donald Trump. Anybody who has been watching and trying to discern what the truth is here knows that this guy tried to destroy our entire system of government and will do so again. Somebody has to say it. I wish people like Dave Joyce‚ a congressman from Ohio who’s a good guy‚ would stand up and just denounce it. Because if you started to have a few people of good conscience do that‚ maybe we could stop this wave‚ which is frightening beyond belief. HUNT: Well‚ I’m very grateful that you took the time to join us today‚ Chris‚ and I do commend reading this column. I will again say this is something I think about literally every single day because we do want to be a resource‚ a place for people who want to support Donald Trump or who feel dissatisfied with the system in their own lives. I just had to make sure that those ears are continuing to be open to us is a challenge that I grapple with every day. And I really appreciated reading this. Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “With his smug moral superiority‚ Quinn encapsulates everything that’s wrong with modern journalism. He’s decided what ‘the truth’ is and his readers better get on board. No wonder fewer and fewer are buying local newspapers. They’ve become just as insulting to their readers as the national media have been for decades. Incredulous that anyone could see Trump as a better president than Biden.” Rating: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  March 25: Liberal Media Scream: Condescending ‘Really&;#63;’ to Rubio’s wish to be Trump VP (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream reveals just how deep the disrespect for former President Donald Trump goes in the press‚ especially with those who have created a profitable side gig writing and talking about him. In just one word‚ ABC’s Jonathan Karl heaved up a sanctimonious putdown of Trump and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) when the topic of the likely 2024 GOP presidential nominee’s pick for running mate was raised. Rubio has said he would be honored to get the nod‚ as have about a dozen other leading Republicans. What’s more‚ Rubio would likely help Trump add to his coalition to create a potentially winning ticket. But all Karl had to say was‚ “Really&;#63;” It didn’t end there. As Rubio explained the problems President Joe Biden dumped on America‚ Karl couldn’t help but complain‚ “You’re not suggesting that’s all happening because of Biden&;#63;” Rubio affirmed‚ “Absolutely I am.” Here’s the exchange on Sunday’s This Week on ABC: JON KARL: There was some reporting this week that you are possibly under consideration to be Donald Trump’s running mate. I don’t put a lot of stock in this reporting right now. We’re early. But you said it would be “an honor” to be offered a spot on his ticket. Really&;#63; SEN. MARCO RUBIO: Yeah‚ I think anyone who is offered the opportunity to serve this country as vice president should be honored by the opportunity to do it if you are in public service. I’m in the Senate because I want to serve the country. Being vice president is an important way to serve the country. But I’ve also been clear. I’ve never talked to Donald Trump. I’ve never talked to anybody on his team or family or inner circle about vice president. That’s a decision he’s going to make. He has plenty of really good people to pick from. KARL: I mean‚ the reason why I asked is‚ I mean‚ look what happened to the last guy. I mean‚ a mob stormed the Capitol‚ literally calling to hang Mike Pence‚ and Trump defended those chants of “hang Mike Pence.” RUBIO: I will tell you this‚ that when Donald Trump was president of the United States‚ this country was safer. It was more prosperous. We had relations‚ for example‚ in a part of the world that I care about called the Western Hemisphere that were very strong. We had a lot of good things done there. I think the country and the world was a better place when he was president‚ and I would love to see him return to the White House in comparison to the guy who’s there now‚ Joe Biden‚ who’s been a disaster economically. Look at the world. Every single day‚ we wake up to a new crisis‚ to a new conflict. Everything has gone on fire since the time Joe Biden took over. Afghanistan’s gone down. Ukraine has been invaded. Now the Philippines and the Chinese are on the verge of something bad happening every single day. Not to mention the threats to Taiwan. And we have this blowup in Haiti going on in our very own hemisphere. We wake up every single day‚ terrorist attacks‚ 9 million people across the border. That’s what matters to me. KARL: But‚ I mean‚ you’re not suggesting that’s all happening because of Biden&;#63; RUBIO: Absolutely I am. Absolutely I’m suggesting it’s happening because of Biden. He’s president and his weakness and his — KARL: It’s because of Biden that Russia invaded Ukraine&;#63; RUBIO: Absolutely. KARL: It’s because of Biden that Haiti&;#63; RUBIO: Absolutely. I mean Putin is sitting there‚ saying these guys can’t even stand up to the Taliban and they have to fly people hanging off the wings of these airplanes. Now is the time to go. Brent Baker‚ the vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “How arrogant and condescending for a broadcast network TV host to scoff at a U.S. senator for saying he’d be ‘honored’ to serve as the vice presidential candidate of his party. And then‚ to act astonished over a common Republican talking point about President Biden’s foreign policy failures shows Karl is little more than a liberal political operative in the guise of a journalist who is incredulous that anyone could see Trump as a better president than Biden.” Rating: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  March 18: Liberal Media Scream: ‘Bloodbath’ is what media are doing to Trump (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream focuses on the media and President Joe Biden’s distortion of former President Donald Trump’s warning of an economic “bloodbath” if he’s not returned to the White House to stop China’s dumping of autos in the U.S. under Biden. The media‚ and now the Biden campaign‚ pulled the word out of a long Trump explanation at an Ohio political rally of auto sales to make it sound like he was calling for a civil war if he’s not elected. It’s very similar to what the media did after the Jan. 6‚ 2021‚ Capitol riots and spelled out how they’d treat a President Trump if given a chance. Leading that fake rant over the weekend was ABC and a guest on This Week‚ New York magazine’s Susan Glasser‚ formerly with the liberal-left Washington Post and Politico. Without any sign of embarrassment for distorting Trump’s words‚ Glasser ranted on about how threatening Trump is. In office‚ Trump did assail reporters for their “fake news” and overwhelming bias but also was the most accessible and talkative president during his one term. He followed an Obama-Biden administration that was condemned by journalists for avoiding reporters and using technology to go around the media. Susan Glasser on Sunday’s This Week on ABC: “Donald Trump‚ it seems to me‚ it’s very hard eight years into this. We still struggle with how to cover him as journalists‚ but in a way‚ the unhinged‚ rambling rants that you see from the former president of the United States are baked in‚ and I think‚ in a way‚ we are all desensitized and inured to the extraordinary‚ remarkable and very at times un-American and threatening things that the former president is saying. “I’m not saying it’s easy to understand how to cover it‚ but I think we have to cover it when the former president‚ who’s already incited violence among his followers‚ says that there’s going to be a bloodbath after the election if he does not win. He is telling us what he is going to do. … I’m sorry. I just have to say something. Like Donald Trump is attacking‚ in a broad-brush sense‚ the basic pillars of American democracy. Period. Full stop. If that’s not news to you. It’s not about tariffs. That’s not the reason why millions of Americans are supporting Donald Trump. Let’s be real about that.” Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “Yes‚ after eight years of constant hyperventilating by journalists‚ over supposed outrageous comments from Donald Trump‚ many have become ‘inured‚’ but it’s not journalists. It’s the public to the media’s never-ending scare-mongering about Trump bringing an end to ‘the basic pillars of American democracy.’ Glasser’s answer: Double down and get more journalists to be even more aggressive in denouncing Trump. Good luck with that‚ convincing anyone who has already tuned out such vitriol.” Rating: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  March 11: Liberal Media Scream: Hollywood freaks over Trump (Washington Examiner post) Hollywood’s awards season has finally ended and in perfectly normal election-year fashion: Tinseltown freaking out over former President Donald Trump’s possible return to the White House. Oscars host Jimmy Kimmel got a retort from Trump after he blasted the former president and his Republican allies. Kimmel responded‚ “Well‚ thank you‚ President Trump. Thank you for watching. I’m surprised you’re still — isn’t it past your jail time&;#63;” But his shruggable performance was far outdone by the angry venting of actor Robert De Niro‚ who stepped up his attacks on Trump. On Friday‚ De Niro pleased Bill Maher’s audience by blasting Trump. “Vote for Trump and you’ll get the nightmare. Vote for Biden and it will be back to normalcy‚” he began. To laughter and applause from Maher’s Los Angeles studio audience‚ De Niro marveled at how anyone could support Trump. He called the poll-leading former president “a total monster” who will install a “dictatorship.” More insults followed: “sociopathic‚ psychopathic‚ malignant narcissist‚” as well as an “idiot” and “clown.” From Friday’s Real Time with Bill Maher on HBO: ROBERT DE NIRO: The bottom line is: It’s Biden vs. Trump. We want to live in a world that we want to live in and enjoy living in or live in a nightmare&;#63; Vote for Trump and you’ll get the nightmare. Vote for Biden and it will be back to normalcy. … The guy is a total monster‚ and anybody‚ I don’t understand it. I guess they get behind the kind of logic: They want to f*** with people‚ screw them because they’re unhappy about something. He’s such a mean‚ nasty‚ hateful person. I’d never play him as an actor because I can’t see any good in him — nothing‚ nothing at all‚ nothing redeemable in him. Whoever the people are who want to vote for him‚ and they look like intelligent people around there‚ for some reason‚ it can’t be‚ it cannot be. If he wins the election‚ you won’t be on the show anymore. He’ll come looking for me. They’ll be things that happened that none of us can imagine. That’s what happens in that kind of a dictatorship — which is what he says. Let’s believe him. Take him at his word. He’s a sociopathic‚ psychopathic‚ malignant narcissist. He is a dangerous person … the people who somehow think he’s going to be the answer to their prayers‚ whatever those are. BILL MAHER: Did you know him as fellow New Yorkers&;#63; DE NIRO: Never wanted to know him. MAHER: Never wanted to‚ you must have crossed — DE NIRO: He was an idiot. He was a clown. He was a clown in New York. Brent Baker‚ the vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “Rants like this from pretentious Hollywood celebrities probably drive more to vote for Trump than dissuade anyone from supporting him. How many care about the all-too-predictable left-wing political views of lefties in Hollywood who always denounce the Republican candidate and advocate for the Democratic one&;#63; Not anyone who is drawn to Trump.” Rating: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  March 4: Liberal Media Scream: Media role is reeducating you on greatness of Bidenomics (Washington Examiner post) President Joe Biden has apparently realized that pitching “Bidenomics” is a loser politically‚ but his White House forgot to tell its media echo chamber. According to an Issues &; Insights report‚ Biden has “ditched” the term‚ with the report noting Biden and his White House used the term 59 times last July. By last month‚ it got a mention just 10 times. That makes sense since most polls show that the public viewed the term negatively because they feel that the economy is poor and that prices are unjustifiably high. But the well-paid Washington media thinks the public is stupid and needs to be reeducated on just how great Bidenomics is for them. For example‚ this week’s Liberal Media Scream features longtime editor and columnist Margaret Sullivan telling fellow anti-Trumper Christiane Amanpour that it’s up to them to make sure people understand the consequences of their wrong-headedness. “You know‚” Sullivan said on Amanpour’s show‚ “people think that the economy is not doing well. You know‚ do our public service mission‚ which is to make sure‚ as sure as we can‚ that we have an informed electorate. Whose fault is that&;#63; Well‚ it’s partly the fault of the media. And I think that that ought to be rectified.” From Saturday’s The Amanpour Hour on CNN CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: The horse race and an age-old dilemma. Why the obsession over Biden’s age misses the point. MARGARET SULLIVAN‚ GUARDIAN: I wonder whether people are as aware of Trump’s authoritarian plans as they are of Biden’s age. AMANPOUR: My next guest says enough is enough with the media’s hyperbolic herd mentality coverage of Biden’s age and competency. Critic‚ columnist‚ and academic Margaret Sullivan urges us to get real about the issues because this election is about much more than‚ quote‚ “chasing clicks.” SULLIVAN: I think that the leaders of major American news organizations should have front and center in their minds‚ and be communicating to their staffs‚ that this is an extremely consequential election and we should be doing our public service role that it’s not so much about chasing the latest clicks and the latest horse race coverage but rather to make sure that we’re getting the stakes of the race across to people. You know‚ people think that the economy is not doing well. You know‚ do our public service mission‚ which is to make sure‚ as sure as we can‚ that we have an informed electorate. Whose fault is that&;#63; Well‚ it’s partly the fault of the media. And I think that that ought to be rectified. Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “What Margaret Sullivan advocates is exactly why the media have lost all credibility and trust for most Americans. She’s decided Trump is too dangerous to be president‚ so journalists should throw away all standards of journalism by openly joining Team Biden to convince voters of Biden’s virtues while downplaying his negatives. And then journalists wonder why they are seen in such low esteem when they are little more than Democratic Party operatives.” Rating: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  February 26: Liberal Media Scream: Trump Derangement Syndrome flies off the charts (Washington Examiner post) The media have been on a rantfest lately‚ warning that former President Donald Trump will end democracy and execute his enemies. Just consider what Bob Costas said over the weekend. “You have to be in the throes of some sort of toxic delusion in a toxic cult to believe that Donald Trump has ever been‚ in any sense‚ emotionally‚ psychologically‚ intellectually‚ or ethically fit to be president of the United States‚” he said. But that’s nothing compared to our Liberal Media Scream focus on Tom Schaller‚ the author of White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy‚ who went further to attack the half of the nation that has supported Trump over the years. White rural voters‚ he told MSNBC’s Morning Joe host Mika Brzezinski‚ “are the most racist‚ xenophobic‚ anti-immigrant‚ and anti-gay geodemographic group in the country. … They’re the most conspiracist group: QAnon support and subscribers‚ election denialism‚ COVID denialism and scientific skepticism‚ Obama birthism.” And that’s just the start of his five scream rant. From Monday’s Morning Joe on MSNBC: MIKA BRZEZINSKI: As we barrel toward a likely rematch of the 2020 election‚ one candidate continues to have a hold over white rural voters. But it’s not Joe Biden‚ seen here as a boy on the right side of your screen‚ who went to public school‚ is the son of a used car salesman‚ and was born to a middle-class family in Scranton‚ Pennsylvania. Instead‚ it is Trump‚ here on the left side‚ a private school-educated son of a New York City real estate tycoon who became a millionaire at 8 years old and didn’t have to serve because he claimed he had bone spurs in his little feet. So‚ why is it that Trump appeals so much to a group he couldn’t be more different from&;#63; Joining us now‚ professor of political science at the University of Maryland‚ Baltimore County‚ Tom Schaller‚ and journalist and opinion writer Paul Waldman. Their new book out tomorrow is entitled‚ White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy. Tom‚ I’ll start with you. Why are white rural voters a threat to democracy at this point&;#63; You would think‚ as we pointed out‚ looking at Joe Biden’s background and Donald Trump’s‚ that the opposite would be true. TOM SCHALLER: “We lay out the fourfold interconnected threat that white rural voters pose to the country. First of all‚ we show 30 polls and national studies that demonstrate this. So we provide the receipts in Chapter 6. They are the most racist‚ xenophobic‚ anti-immigrant‚ and anti-gay geodemographic group in the country. “Second‚ they’re the most conspiracist group: QAnon support and subscribers‚ election denialism‚ COVID denialism and scientific skepticism‚ Obama birthism. Third‚ anti-democratic sentiments. They don’t believe in an independent press — free speech. They’re most likely to say the president should be able to act unilaterally without checks from Congress or the courts or the bureaucracy. They’re also the most strongly white nationalist and white Christian nationalists. And fourth‚ they’re most likely to excuse or justify violence as acceptable alternative to peaceful public discourse… “I think this is the disconnect‚ right&;#63; They’d rather channel their rage. I think what a lot of white rural Americans have decided is that their economic fortunes are decided by globalization and frankly‚ late-stage capitalism‚ which is eating up all the mom and pop stores and taking away the extractive industries‚ in coal and farming and so forth‚ so they might as well vote on their culture issues‚ they might as well vote on God‚ guns‚ and religion because they feel like neither party is going to deliver any material benefit. “They’re not going to reverse the closure of rural pharmacies and rural hospitals and rural healthcare facilities‚ which are disappearing not because of communism and not because of socialism but because of capitalism‚ right&;#63; Rural pharmacies and hospitals are closing because they’re not moneymakers‚ and unless they’re part of a regional chain‚ they’re disappearing. So Trump comes in and says‚ let’s just hate on cities‚ let’s just hate on minorities‚ let’s hate on immigrants‚ and at least they can deliver on that. And so they’re not even voting in their material interest anymore‚ and that’s causing a further decay and decline of rural communities.” Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explained our weekly pick: “So‚ if a class of voters prefers a candidate you don’t like‚ it couldn’t be that they just have a differing opinion with which you can respectfully disagree. No‚ you must impugn and demean them to discredit their irrational preference for the candidate you condescendingly have decided is not in their best interest. And since this makes MSNBC viewers feel superior‚ you get a welcoming platform on the left-wing cable channel’s morning show.” Rating: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  February 19: Liberal Media Scream: Colbert says Trump ‘going to prison’ better than sex (Washington Examiner post) Remember when late-night comedy shows were funny instead of being populated by left-wing lecturers&;#63; Case in point in our weekly Liberal Media Scream is Late Show host Stephen Colbert. Along with many people last week‚ he watched the televised testimony of Fulton County‚ Georgia‚ District Attorney Fani Willis and her explanation of her affair with an attorney she put in charge of the election case against former President Donald Trump. “How good was this sex&;#63; Good enough to risk democracy over&;#63;” he asked in his monologue. Colbert then added‚ “You know what feels really good&;#63; Donald Trump going to prison. That — that‚ my friends — is what they call a real happy ending.” From Thursday’s Late Show with Stephen Colbert on CBS:     STEPHEN COLBERT: Now‚ I don’t know who’s telling the truth here yet‚ but I will say exchanging business cards isn’t exactly a meet cute. The movie’s not called When Harry Networked with Sally. Now‚ at one point‚ Willis had had enough and really laid into opposing counsel. FANI WILLIS: You’re confused; you think I’m on trial. These people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020. I’m not on trial‚ no matter how hard you try to put me on trial. COLBERT: Damn straight. Yeah. That’s right. That’s right. Here’s the thing. Yes‚ it’s true Donald Trump and his associates are on trial in this‚ one of the most important cases in the history of our republic. So‚ and‚ I’ve just got one follow-up question here: Given that if you are removed from the prosecution‚ it could delay this trial until after the election: How good was the sex&;#63; Good enough to risk democracy over&;#63; Because I’ve never had sex that good. You know what feels really good&;#63; Donald Trump going to prison. That — that‚ my friends — is what they call the real happy ending. Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “Liberals love to complain that Donald Trump has broken many norms‚ but prominent entertainment media figures like Colbert have destroyed late-night TV. It was a comedy refuge from hard-edged politics‚ but Colbert is using his show to advance left-wing talking points and push his hate of Trump and conservatives in the guise of comedy. It’s not funny‚ and a legend like Johnny Carson‚ whose political jokes were light-hearted and chided both sides‚ is rolling over in his grave.” Rating: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  February 12: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC host laughably says press against Biden (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream has LOL written all over it. Imagine any cable news show host claiming that the media has a negative bias against President Joe Biden. LOL‚ right&;#63; That’s what happened on Sunday’s Meet the Press when MSNBC host Jen Psaki said the media showed its bias when it simply repeated what the nearly 400-page report from special counsel Robert Hur said about the president’s foggy mind. Psaki‚ who was Biden’s first White House press secretary‚ complained that the media should be attacking former President Donald Trump‚ not her former boss. “If you’re sitting in the White House and on the campaign right now‚ you’re absolutely banging your head against the wall at the way that the Thursday report has been covered‚ given all of the things” Trump has said and done‚ she said. From the roundtable on Sunday’s Meet the Press: JEN PSAKI: If you’re sitting in the White House and on the campaign right now‚ you’re absolutely banging your head against the wall at the way that the Thursday report has been covered‚ given all of the things that have happened this week‚ including‚ and I know you asked Chris Christie about this‚ the fact that Donald Trump yesterday suggested that Vladimir Putin should have free rein in attacking NATO allies‚ and what do we see is wall-to-wall coverage of whether a guy who is four years older than his opponent is too old to be president. KRISTEN WELKER: And we are going to get to NATO. Go ahead. BRENDAN BUCK‚ former spokesman to ex-speaker Paul Ryan: Part of that job‚ to bring that to the front is‚ it’s the president’s job to bring that out and attack his opponent. I mean‚ the president is not taking the opportunity on Super Bowl Sunday. He’s not taking‚ really‚ any opportunities. And we hear‚ time and again — PSAKI: First of all‚ that’s not true. It’s not being covered. He has traveled just as much as Donald Trump‚ as Barack Obama. It is hard to break through the cloud of Donald Trump in this media environment. That is true. Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “A media hostile to a liberal cause or Democratic politician is such a novelty that liberal political operatives like Jen Psaki just can’t comprehend it. After three-plus years of sycophantic coverage of Joe Biden‚ he gets a few days of negative coverage‚ and she lashes out at the media for daring to briefly act as real journalists. Welcome to the world endured every day for decades by conservatives and Republicans.”   Rating: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  February 5: Liberal Media Scream: Kristen Welker likes to lecture Republicans‚ too (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream features a look at new Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker’s treatment of Republican leaders. And surprise — not — she continues to be just as biased as former host Chuck Todd. First‚ she lectured House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on the border bill released by the Senate on Sunday. “You are now the speaker of the House. Do you not have a responsibility to your voters‚ to the people who put you in office‚ to address what you have called a crisis and catastrophe&;#63; Isn’t something better than nothing&;#63;” she said. Then‚ she passed along the Democratic talking point that after three years of aggressively enacting open border policies‚ “Joe Biden said he would shut down the border.” From Sunday’s Meet the Press on NBC: KRISTEN WELKER: You have been calling for legislative change to actually deal with this problem. You are now the speaker of the House. Do you not have a responsibility to your voters‚ to the people who put you in office‚ to address what you have called a crisis and catastrophe&;#63; Isn’t something better than nothing&;#63; SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON: Kristen‚ we did that. We did that nine months ago. And since we passed our measure in the House to solve this problem‚ and the reason we had to do it is because we saw that President Biden was not fulfilling his obligation under the law. That’s why it is such a failure of leadership‚ but we did our part. And by the way‚ since then‚ in the nine months since that bill sat on [Senate Majority Leader] Chuck Schumer’s desk‚ collecting dust‚ 1.8 million illegals have been allowed into this country‚ welcomed into the country‚ sent around the nation into every community — communities near everyone listening and watching this morning. And that is a catastrophe‚ and the American people know it‚ and that’s part of the reason that Joe Biden has the lowest approval rating of any president facing reelection. WELKER: Even former President Trump‚ though‚ called for legislative change on this issue. You have one of the slimmest majorities in the House in history. Don’t you have to compromise to get something done&;#63; What you passed in the House can’t pass in the Senate‚ Mr. Speaker. You know that. JOHNSON: We are willing to work. We are willing to work with the Senate. I am not disclosing that‚ and I’ve been very consistent for the hundred days that I’ve had the gavel. We are willing to work‚ but they have to be serious about it. If you only do a few of those components‚ you are not going to solve the problem‚ and Kristen‚ that is not a Republican talking point. That’s what the sheriffs at the border‚ the Border Patrol agents‚ the deputy chief of U.S. Border Patrol‚ a 33-year veteran of the agency‚ told us. He said that it’s as though we’re administering an open fire hydrant. He said‚ “I don’t need more buckets‚” like the president has proposed. I need to stop the flow‚ and we know how to do that‚ but Joe Biden is unwilling to do it. WELKER: Let me ask you about your decision‚ and by the way‚ Joe Biden said he would shut down the border. He’s calling for more funding. He’s calling for you to pass this legislation. Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “A perfect example of a so-called journalist serving as an advocate for Washington’s media-political establishment‚ demanding a recalcitrant conservative get in line and adopt the approved narrative.” Rating: THREE out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  January 29‚ 2024: No Liberal Media Scream this week.   â–  January 22‚ 2024: Liberal Media Scream: Washington Post’s Rubin wants Trump ‘fascists’ reeducated (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream features popular Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin doubling down on her Never Trump campaign. Appearing on the MSNBC weekend show Velshi exactly a year from Inauguration Day‚ the onetime conservative opinion writer said that the masses appearing at former President Donald Trump’s rallies “are part of a fascist cult.” And‚ she added‚ “they’re impervious to any kind of data‚ any kind of information. But what you have to do‚ if you care about democracy‚ is mobilize the people who already know that he’s a danger and reaffirm and reeducate the people who are perhaps kind of flirting in the middle — they’re soft Republicans‚ they’re never Republicans — about the danger of going back to Trump.” Rubin on MSNBC’s Velshi on Saturday: “Why it’s perhaps important to go to one of these rallies is to understand why he does have supporters. These people are part of a fascist cult. And let’s be honest‚ there are a lot of them. But a lot of them doesn’t mean that they are behaving logically or rationally. To the contrary‚ we’ve seen in other fascist regimes that millions of people‚ sometimes even a majority of the country‚ becomes intoxicated with an authoritarian figure‚ and these people are utterly irrational. If you speak to some of them‚ they will spit back these bizarro conspiracy theories. They actually believe in all of the mumbo-jumbo that he tells them. “So I think it would be a wake-up call about what these people are about‚ and‚ no‚ we’re not going to convince people who are part of the cult to switch. As you say‚ they’re impervious to any kind of data‚ any kind of information. But what you have to do‚ if you care about democracy‚ is mobilize the people who already know that he’s a danger and reaffirm and reeducate the people who are perhaps kind of flirting in the middle — they’re soft Republicans‚ they’re never Republicans — about the danger of going back to Trump. And I think that’s the job between now and November‚ and that’s the challenge for the Biden administration.” Brent Baker‚ the vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “How condescending of Rubin to be so comfortable denigrating supporters of a presidential candidate she despises with one of the most vile insults. Just because she hates Trump doesn’t make those going to his rallies‚ the very embodiment of democracy in action‚ ‘fascists.’ Whatever happened to liberals wanting to expand participation in the democratic process&;#63;” Rating: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  January 15‚ 2024: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC’s Mika all in to help Biden’s reelection (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream features Mika Brzezinski‚ the co-host of MSNBC’s Morning Joe‚ fawning over first lady Jill Biden in a sign of where the cable network stands before the 2024 presidential primary season begins. With easy questions quizzing Biden about her favorite emoji to dismissing chants of “Let’s go Brandon” that still follow the president‚ Brzezinski put on an able defense of the Biden White House. Among the questions posed to the first lady was this: “The division in this country‚ the cruelty of MAGA Republicans against your family. Does any part of you once in a while think‚ ugh‚ maybe we bow out&;#63;” The questions were part of Brzezinski’s Know Your Value “movement.” Our partners at the Media Research Center highlighted these from last Thursday’s show and today’s event at the White House: MIKA BRZEZINSKI: You’ve been married to President Joe Biden for 46 years. There have been Senate races‚ three presidential campaigns‚ eight years of your husband serving as vice president. Unthinkable personal loss and challenge‚ and now democracy is on the ballot. What do you think when you hear people say‚ “Well‚ I just can’t vote for Joe Biden this election&;#63;” What is it that they may not know about him at this point‚ especially when the alternative seems to want to change this nation so radically&;#63; BRZEZINSKI: Potentially another four years in the White House. With everything you do here‚ does yet another one give you any pause thinking of‚ like‚ the personal health and well-being for both of you&;#63; The division in this country‚ the cruelty of MAGA Republicans against your family. Does any part of you once in a while think‚ ugh‚ maybe we bow out&;#63; BRZEZINSKI: How have you been coping personally with the onslaught of accusations against your husband and your family‚ including and especially Hunter‚ the focus of a House Oversight Committee hearing holding‚ holding him in contempt‚ obsessing over him‚ showing pictures of him during vulnerable moments in his battle with addiction on the floor of the House. This would crush any family. BRZEZINSKI: What do you think when you hear Trump Republicans calling it “Biden crime family” or one congresswoman‚ “The Biden crime family sold out America‚” Marjorie Taylor Greene‚ “He’s a liar‚ he’s mentally incompetent‚” and let’s not even talk about what “Let’s go Brandon” means. But you have U.S. senators holding signs that say that. ….BRZEZINSKI: Your favorite emoji&;#63; JILL BIDEN: Oh‚ my gosh. The turquoise heart. BRZEZINSKI: Turquoise heart&;#63; BIDEN: Yeah. BRZEZINSKI: I don’t have the turquoise heart on my phone. What does that mean&;#63; BIDEN: It’s like the beach. It’s calm. BRZEZINSKI: Oh‚ I like that. BIDEN: Color of the sea. BRZEZINSKI: Do I type out turquoise heart&;#63; Comfort food&;#63; BIDEN: Oh‚ french fries. BRZEZINSKI: Umm. Yeah‚ yeah. Brent Baker‚ vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “Mika Brzezinski is all in on the reelection of Joe Biden. First lady Jill Biden picked well in selecting Brzezinski to interview her‚ confident she wouldn’t be challenged as they both could commiserate with how awful Trump is and how mean Republicans are to her family‚ topped by letting her tout the turquoise heart emoji. How informative.” Rating: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  January 8‚ 2024: Liberal Media Scream: Stephanopoulos judges Trump an insurrectionist‚ unqualified for 2024 (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream is a five-screamer featuring an ABC host and former Clinton handler acting as judge‚ jury‚ and executioner of former President Donald Trump and his effort to remain on the 2024 primary ballots and let voters‚ not partisan state officials‚ decide his fate. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos‚ on his Sunday show This Week‚ was quizzing his panel about the campaigns in some states to declare Trump ineligible for election because an official decided that the former president triggered a 14th Amendment ban on insurrectionists. On his show‚ which occurred the day after the third anniversary of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot‚ one of his panelists suggested the Supreme Court will decide Trump is guilty but that it will be up to Congress and not the states to erase the GOP front-runner’s name from the ballots. “If you say he engaged in insurrection‚” Stephanopoulos said‚ “I don’t see how you can escape the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment and say he’s qualified to run for office.” Panelist Donna Brazile‚ an influential liberal and former acting Democratic Party chairwoman‚ told her host‚ “I totally agree with you‚ George.” From the roundtable on Sunday’s This Week on ABC: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Sarah‚ what’s your guess on what the court does here&;#63; SARAH ISGUR‚ SENIOR EDITOR OF THE DISPATCH: I think you’ll have the Supreme Court hold that he is not disqualified from being on the ballot. They’ll overturn the Colorado Supreme Court. STEPHANOPOULOS: The question is‚ how will they do it though&;#63; ISGUR: Correct. I think they’ll say that‚ in fact‚ the 14th Amendment makes clear it’s up to Congress. If Congress can requalify someone by a two-thirds vote‚ there’s no timeline on that. Which means that‚ you know‚ as one of the amicus briefs has pointed out‚ it’s really supposed to be post-elections about holding office‚ not running for office. And so I think they’ll say it’s really Congress’s job. The states can’t make up their own standard. Is it beyond a reasonable doubt&;#63; Is it more likely than not&;#63; Et cetera. What’s interesting to me will be whether or not the Supreme Court goes out of their way in order to get those three‚ Kagan‚ Sotomayor‚ Jackson votes‚ in saying‚ “Yes‚ it was an insurrection‚ and yes‚ he engaged in it‚ but it’s up to Congress.” STEPHANOPOULOS: I don’t see how they can do that‚ Donna Brazile. If you say he engaged in insurrection‚ was the question I asked Nancy Pelosi‚ I don’t see how you can escape the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment and say he’s qualified to run for office. DONNA BRAZILE: I totally agree with you‚ George. Brent Baker‚ the vice president of research and publications for the Media Research Center‚ explains our weekly pick: “Another example of how Stephanopoulos remains a Democratic partisan first‚ a journalist a distant second. No true journalist would weigh in with a definitive conclusion on what the Supreme Court should do weeks before a ruling on such a contentious issue which divides Americans. Stephanopoulos has clearly put himself in the camp with those who want to deny the public’s ability to vote for whomever they prefer. So much for saving democracy from Trump when you want to subvert the process.” Rating: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS.   â–  December 25‚ 2023 and January 1‚ 2024: No Liberal Media Screams these weeks.   â–  December 18‚ 2023: Liberal Media Scream: Scaremonger Scarborough: Trump will ‘execute’ foes‚ crush ‘American experiment’ (Washington Examiner post) This week’s Liberal Media Scream features MSNBC Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough’s latest anti-Trump ranting. The host‚ whose earlier claim that former President Donald Trump will “execute” foes should he be reelected won the Media Research Center’s “Worst Quote of the Year‚” said on Monday that Trump would destroy America’s democracy‚ too. “A year from now‚ it could be over‚ the American experiment at an end one year from now‚” Scarborough said in comments we graded a rare five out of five “liberal media screams.” His comments are clearly what the latest Rasmussen Reports survey was tapping into when it found that more voters than ever believe the left bias in the media has reached a new high. The comments also raise a question about what scaremongering liberal media figures will be saying in 11 months if Trump is on the verge of beating President Joe Biden. Scarborough on Monday’s Morning Joe in a discussion with Politico’s Jonathan Lemire: “One year from now‚ it could be over. American democracy could be over. Donald Trump‚ one year from now‚ could win. He’s told us what he is going to do. When I say Amer

Joe Biden has failed women once again with new Title IX amendments that largely overhaul Trump-era rules. Title IX‚ which was intended to protect women in athletics‚ will now pave the way for female athletes to continue being overpowered by trans competitors‚ as Biden’s new rules stipulate more protections for LGBTQ+ students. The rules state that students cannot be discriminated against for sexual orientation or “gender identity‚” although a mandate on whether trans athletes can be barred from competing in the division opposite of their biological sex remains undecided. The changes also target the way sexual harassment and sexual assault are defined and how due process is conducted. Per Biden’s revisions‚ the definitions of sexual harrassment and sexual assault will be expanded‚ and alleged victims will no longer be required to attend live hearings or cross examinations where they would otherwise have to face the accused. Megyn Kelly‚ who Dave Rubin says is “loud and proud and hear me roar” in all the right ways‚ had something to say about Biden’s revisions as well as her voting history. “I voted for Donald Trump to prevent things like this‚” she said. “What Joe Biden just did to women's rights and Title IX and due process for young men on college campuses and free speech — I was horrified.” “I’m ashamed of him&;#33; I’m disgusted at you‚ Miguel Cardona. Shame on you‚” she spat. “Your daughter ... will now have to go into [a] college bathroom‚ [a] college locker room and be faced with men posing as women — many of whom are only there because they get off on wearing women's clothing ... and there's not a damn thing you can do about it.” “It’s direct‚ and it’s true‚” says Dave. Even though “Donald Trump has gone after [Megyn] personally‚” she is still “endorsing [him] for 2024” as she did in 2020. “It wasn't about me‚” she said. “It was about my concern for this country and my children and what was happening in particular in [the transgender] culture lane but in other lanes as well.” To hear Kelly’s full analysis on Biden’s new rules and her explanation regarding her voting choices‚ watch the clip below. Want more from Dave Rubin&;#63;To enjoy more honest conversations‚ free speech‚ and big ideas with Dave Rubin‚ subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America‚ defend the Constitution‚ and live the American dream.

During remarks before the House passed a Ukraine aid bill on Saturday‚ Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly of Virginia passionately advocated for the U.S. to green-light assistance for the Eastern European nation.After noting that some people say that the U.S. needs to address its border first‚ Connolly said‚ &;quot;The Ukrainian-Russian border is our border. It's the border between depraved autocracy and freedom-loving people seeking our democratic way of life.&;quot; He said‚ &;quot;We must meet this test today. We must stand with Ukraine.&;quot;In response to Connolly's comment‚ GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida tweeted‚ &;quot;No it isn't.&;quot;&;quot;Nope‚ it sure isn't‚&;quot; Republican Rep. Kat Cammack of Florida tweeted.GOP Rep. Andrew Clyde of Georgia described Connolly's claim as &;quot;the America Last Uniparty in a nutshell.&;quot;&;quot;This has got to be a joke&;#33;&;#33;&;#33; This is offensive to all Americans‚&;quot; Republican Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina tweeted. — (@) The House passed the Ukraine aid bill on Saturday in a 311-112 vote. All 112 of the votes against the measure came from Republicans.Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy heralded the House's passage of the bill.&;quot;I am grateful to the United States House of Representatives‚ both parties‚ and personally Speaker Mike Johnson for the decision that keeps history on the right track‚&;quot; he noted in a post on X. &;quot;Democracy and freedom will always have global significance and will never fail as long as America helps to protect it. The vital U.S. aid bill passed today by the House will keep the war from expanding‚ save thousands and thousands of lives‚ and help both of our nations to become stronger.&;quot;The Senate is expected to vote on a package that rolls the Ukraine aid together with other items. President Joe Biden has indicated that he plans to sign it. — (@) Like Blaze News&;#63; Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here&;#33;