UPDATE Jan. 25‚ 2024 5:45 p.m.: The Maine House of Representatives’ Judiciary Committee voted that the transgender custody bill LD 1735 “ought not to pass” Thursday. According to footage of the committee posted online‚ the motion that the bill “ought not to pass” passed 12-0. “My team and I are so incredibly grateful for every single person who wrote emails and shared it with their family and friends‚” Alvin Lui‚ president of the parental rights organization Courage Is a Habit‚ told The Daily Signal in a statement Thursday. “This 12-0 defeat of this transgender trafficking bill was done in a blue state that allows 9-month abortions and 16-year-olds to obtain transgender drugs and surgeries without parental consent‚” Lui said. “This absolute win is only a glimpse of what can happen when Americans take action.” Original article: The Maine House of Representatives is considering a bill that would protect anyone who takes a child who identifies as transgender away from “non-affirming” parents in order to subject that minor to experimental transgender medical interventions. The legislation also would counteract laws protecting minors from such “treatment” in other states. The Maine bill‚ LD 1735‚ would prioritize “gender-affirming care” in custody disputes. It would prohibit courts from considering that a person applying for custody had taken a child from someone else with legal custody—such as parents—if that person removed the child “for the purposes of obtaining gender-affirming health care… for the child” from a state that restricts this experimental “care.” This means judges in custody cases would have to look favorably on anyone who removes a child from parents‚ so long as that person does so to help the child receive experimental transgender “treatments” that may leave him or her stunted‚ scarred‚ and infertile. Gender activists and their allies who have infiltrated health care organizations often insist that these interventions—which often amount to chemical castration—are essential to prevent gender-confused children from committing suicide. This twisted logic enables activists to claim that a parent’s disagreement on gender identity constitutes a form of “mental harm” to a child.  The idea that a father’s refusing to sign up his daughter for a path leading to the removal of healthy breasts and a healthy womb constitutes child abuse is so absurd‚ it requires multiple levels of doublespeak to justify. False terms such as “gender-affirming care” are necessary to cloak the truth of what is going on.  Yet the Maine bill goes all-in on this deceptive phrase‚ from the title (“An Act to Safeguard Gender-Affirming Health Care”) to the definition framing these interventions as “medically necessary health care that respects the gender identity of the patient‚ as experienced and defined by the patient.” Note that the definition doesn’t say that a medical doctor has to sign off on a diagnosis. The bill’s framing around “gender-affirming care” overlooks the testimony of doctors who warn that even the “social transition” of encouraging a boy to present as a girl “is a powerful psychotherapeutic intervention that radically changes outcomes.” Doctors also warn that children can’t possibly give informed consent for procedures that may sterilize them and put them at risk of long-term side effects such as decreased bone density and cardiovascular disease. Yet LD 1735 would make these interventions sacrosanct by treating any refusal of them as tantamount to child abuse. The bill would grant Maine courts “temporary emergency jurisdiction” in cases where the child must be protected “because the child has been unable to obtain gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care.” This “temporary emergency jurisdiction” in custody cases already applies to child abandonment and to situations where “it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child or a sibling or parent of the child is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse.” The bill merely would add the inability to receive “gender-affirming health care” to this list of emergency conditions. LD 1735 also would prevent law enforcement in the Pine Tree State from arresting or helping to extradite a person for violating “another state’s law against providing‚ receiving or allowing a child to receive gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care in this state.” It would bar law enforcement from providing information to an out-of-state agency regarding any such “care” performed in Maine. The bill also states that “an out-of-state arrest warrant for an individual based on violating another state’s law against providing‚ receiving‚ or allowing a child to receive gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care is the lowest law enforcement priority.” The bill might enable situations such as the child sex trafficking of Sage‚ a girl who was encouraged to hide her transgender identity from her grandmother. According to her grandmother‚ Sage ran away after she was victimized in a boys’ bathroom at school‚ then ended up getting abducted‚ raped‚ and beaten. Sage had been taken across state lines from Virginia to Maryland‚ and a Maryland lawyer fought to keep Sage away from her grandmother. Last February‚ a Virginia bill aimed at preventing Sage’s tragedy from happening again died in the Old Dominion’s Democratic-majority Senate. “This bill would‚ in effect‚ make Maine a party to the trafficking of minors from other states‚” Jay Richards‚ director of the Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Life‚ Religion‚ and Family at The Heritage Foundation‚ told The Daily Signal in a statement Wednesday. (The Daily Signal is The Heritage Foundation’s news outlet.) The Maine bill “would draw troubled teens from other states that have protected them from receiving ghoulish sex trait-modification drugs and surgery‚” Richards said. “There is no good evidence that such medical interventions help minors‚ and plenty of evidence of their harms.” Alvin Lui‚ president of the parental rights group Courage Is a Habit‚ also opposes the bill. “LD 1735 is a transgender trafficking bill that would permit the state of Maine to receive minors from other states seeking transgender treatments‚ such as breast binding‚ penis tucking‚ irreversible puberty blockers‚ cross-sex hormones‚ or mutilation surgeries‚” Lui told The Daily Signal in a written statement Wednesday. Courage Is a Habit has encouraged Americans to contact Maine legislators about the bill‚ whether they live in Maine or not. The Maine House Judiciary Committee plans to consider the bill Thursday. According to the pro-transgender Movement Advancement Project‚ 14 states have laws or executive orders to “shield” people who perform experimental transgender medical interventions from laws in other states. These laws may include the same sort of custody provisions that could protect kidnappers. Maine-LD-1735-Transgender-TraffickingDownload Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post BREAKING: Maine Bill That Protects Kidnappers Who Take ‘Transgender Kids’ for ‘Gender-Affirming Care’ Fails in Committee appeared first on The Daily Signal.

A major feature of the House Ways and Means Committee’s “tax” bill is an expansion of the child tax credit. This expansion was necessary to secure Democrats’ support for the corporate tax provisions in the bill‚ but the trade isn’t worth the cost. The welfare-related child tax credit provisions aren’t a minor extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017‚ but a massive departure from the status quo. Together‚ they move the country in the wrong direction on welfare policy after years of pro-family‚ pro-work progress. The problems with the committee’s bill are many. It would increase welfare subsidies for single parents rather than further promoting and strengthening married‚ two-parent households. It would undermine rather than strengthen work requirements in welfare. It would increase‚ not reduce‚ fraud and excess benefits. It would provide more welfare to illegal immigrants. Fundamentally‚ this bill accepts the tenets of President Joe Biden’s welfare agenda and‚ if it is not stopped this time‚ will need to be fixed when the rest of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire in 2025.  Far from a program that incentivizes work and family formation‚ the Ways and Means Committee’s bill‚ by expanding so-called refundable child tax credits‚ would simply expand the traditionally flawed welfare state. The bill is based on the premise that more welfare money must be spent‚ primarily to subsidize single parents. Although the bill claims its aim is to provide “tax relief” to families with children‚ there is little “tax relief” in it for working families. Instead‚ over 90% of the “family benefits” would be new cash welfare payments to families who pay no federal income taxes and little or no Social Security tax. Nearly all family benefits in the bill are overt cash welfare payments‚ not “tax relief.”  If passed‚ the bill would greatly expand the Additional Child Tax Credit‚ which is a simple cash welfare benefit program that has nothing to do with taxes. The current ACTC program has a weak work requirement riddled with extensive fraud. The committee bill would deliberately weaken this already weak work requirement.  Under current law‚ parents ostensibly are required to work to obtain ACTC benefits; benefits increase as earnings increase. However‚ this work requirement is highly porous and readily evaded through fraud. In the current program‚ only 55% of benefits for single parents appear to go to eligible parents. Often‚ the custodial single parent will transfer eligibility for the benefit and the work requirement to relatives or other adults who don’t even live with the child.  The transferred benefit then is shared with the nonworking single parent. A work requirement that easily can be “transferred” to others is not a serious requirement. Regrettably‚ this bill takes an already porous‚ fraud-filled work requirement and would weaken it further by insisting that recipients need only work every other year instead of every year.   Another alarming aspect of the bill is its expansion of an existing problem: welfare payments targeted to illegal immigrants. Under current law‚ illegal immigrants who have children born in the U.S. (and many do) may claim cash welfare benefits from the ACTC. The committee bill would expand these cash welfare payments for millions of current illegal aliens and millions more who enter the country in the future—exacerbating a design flaw in the program.   The bill would substantially increase a means-tested welfare system that already costs over $1.2 trillion per year. Benefits in that system are already quite high. Under current law‚ for example‚ in 2023‚ a single mother with two school-age children earning $15‚000 per year also would receive $15‚476 in welfare benefits from the Earned Income Tax Credit‚ the Additional Child Tax Credit‚ and the food stamps and school nutrition programs. In addition‚ this family would be eligible for Medicaid coverage worth‚ on average‚ around $14‚950. Altogether‚ these standard welfare benefits would triple the parent’s income; total post-tax resources would come to around $44‚300. In addition‚ some (but not all) such families would receive Section 8 or other public housing aid worth around $10‚000‚ bringing total potential resources to around $54‚300. The Ways and Means Committee’s bill would add more cash welfare on top of this benefit pile. In this example‚ the single parent would receive an added $1‚875 in cash grants under the bill. This would bring the family’s total income to $46‚184‚ or $56‚184 if the family received housing aid. The problem isn’t simply the immediate benefit increase; rather‚ by camouflaging new welfare benefits as “tax relief” and failing to even hint at the welfare already received by its beneficiaries‚ the bill lays fertile ground for even more welfare expansions. A prominent goal of the Left is to remove work requirements from welfare and to restore the work-free‚ unconditional cash aid that existed before welfare reform.  Biden sought to advance this goal by creating a new “child allowance” that removed work requirements from the ACTC and greatly increased benefits. The Ways and Means Committee’s bill goes at least halfway toward fulfilling the president’s aims. The bill embraces the premises and goals of the Biden plan to greatly increase cash welfare payments (predominantly for single parents) while weakening or removing work requirements.  The bill sets the ground for a future “compromise” that would fully enact the Biden “child allowance” program. From this perspective‚ the committee’s bill represents an enormous political and policy victory for Biden.  The welfare portion of the bill directly and explicitly repudiates the principles of successful welfare reform‚ which have governed the welfare system since the mid-1990s. Welfare reform instituted in 1996 by a Republican-led Congress‚ with broad bipartisan support‚ established work requirements and time limits in the dominant welfare program: Aid to Families with Dependent Children‚ known as AFDC. Over 90% of recipients in this program were single-parent families. A principal aim of welfare reform was to halt the rapid and alarming disintegration of marriage. Family collapse had been steadily advancing for decades. Work requirements reduced the utility of being a single parent on welfare and raised the relative utility of being married to a working husband. As a result‚ the rapid decline in married families halted; non-marital teen births and abortions fell rapidly. Overall‚ there have been 10 million fewer abortions due to the changes initiated and promoted by welfare reform. Yet‚ the Ways and Means Committee’s bill would increase cash welfare subsidies to single parents relative to married families and weaken work requirements that predominantly affect single parents. It threatens family formation. Overall‚ the welfare portion of the bill would overturn the principles that conservatives have stood for in welfare and family policy for three decades. If enacted into law‚ it would be a major victory for the Left and a heavy blow for American families.  It also would be a big step backward on the road to reform of America’s broken welfare system. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post House Panel’s Welfare Expansion Fails American Families appeared first on The Daily Signal.

For all our liberal elites' bluster about "right-wing extremists" supposedly making up stories to discredit the politicians they dislike‚ our elites have lately been giving us plenty of evidence to support our "stories." In another addition to the list of Biden 2024 gaffes‚ Wisconsin Democratic Gov. Tony Evers had an...

This has gone from being funny‚ to sad‚ to downright criminal. Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is once again on display‚ this time in an undeniable way. We all forget things from time to time regardless of age or mental acuity; there is nothing wrong with this. However‚ confusing people in front of you with other people who aren’t even in the room is something else altogether‚ so is attempting to shake hands with folks who aren’t there. During a recent press conference‚ Biden confused Alejandro Mayorkas with Xavier Becerra. Sources say Becerra wasn’t even in the room when Biden misidentified Mayorkas. Biden’s latest cognitive misfiring came directly after Karine Jean-Pierre claimed that there was absolutely nothing wrong with Biden’s mental state. Before you watch the moment the incident occurred below‚ always remember that some people in this country still think Biden is a better choice than President Trump. Take a look: WATCH – Biden can’t recognize his own Cabinet Members‚ thinks Alejandro Mayorkas is Xavier Becerra (who wasn’t even in the room). This happened minutes after Karine Jean-Pierre insisted there is nothing wrong with his mental health. pic.twitter.com/GDZbFHKplZ — The First (@TheFirstonTV) January 23‚ 2024 Dr. Carol M. Swain discussed Biden’s cognitive decline and the left’s latest trick: “Two observations here. I find it fascinating how the left is working overtime to shift the conversation away from President Biden’s clear struggle with cognitive decline by working overtime to label Trump “dementia Don.” These people are masterful at knowing how to use the algorithms to get their diversions to trend. Biden is physically and mentally unfit for office. If these were normal times‚ the 25th Amendment would have been invoked against Biden months ago. Unfortunately‚ the existence of an incompetent DEI vice-president means we are stuck with unknowns running the nation.” Two observations here. I find it fascinating how the left is working overtime to shift the conversation away from President Biden’s clear struggle with cognitive decline by working overtime to label Trump “dementia Don.” These people are masterful at knowing how to use the… pic.twitter.com/B0AdahmrsC — Dr. Carol M. Swain (@carolmswain) January 24‚ 2024 Daily Mail provided a transcript of the mixup: ‘I also like to thank the gender policy advisor‚ my gender policy adviser‚ Jen Klein‚’ he said‚ before improvising a line. ‘Where’s Jen sitting? There you are‚ Jen‚’ Biden‚ 81‚ said‚ pointing to his right. ‘Thank you. And Secretary Becerra‚ sitting right next to her‚ for the leadership in this task force‚’ he continued‚ name-checking Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra. Ted Cruz had this to say: “Biden’s mental deterioration is massive. Democrats are trying to argue that Trump has the same issue‚ but that is totally untrue. They are only saying it to protect Joe Biden. Trump would destroy Biden in a cognitive test‚ and it isn’t even close.” Biden’s mental deterioration is massive. Democrats are trying to argue that Trump has the same issue‚ but that is totally untrue. They are only saying it to protect Joe Biden. Trump would destroy Biden in a cognitive test‚ and it isn’t even close.https://t.co/hdWGvGlJCR pic.twitter.com/vK251pnJ4R — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) January 25‚ 2024 Nancy Pelosi says she’s “not gonna spend too much time on Donald Trump’s cognitive disorders‚” then confuses him with Joe Biden pic.twitter.com/iqIjtrb4Ja — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 24‚ 2024 Despite the obvious‚ left-wing outlets like Newsweek continue to claim that it is President Trump who is unwell: Tim O’Brien‚ journalist and author of TrumpNation‚ said he noticed that Trump was not “cognitively together” before the book was released in 2005. “I flew around with him in his plane and walked his golf courses with him 20 years ago… Not very cognitively together then‚” O’Brien said on X‚ formerly Twitter. “Much less cognitively better now.” They’re laying all the groundwork…..how soon until they roll in Michelle? What do you think of that? NATIONAL POLL : Would You Vote For Michelle Obama For President in 2024?

Don’t tell Nikki Haley‚ but the next state to hold its Primary is Nevada. Trump leads by 95%! Yes‚ you read that right and it’s not a typo. Stunning. So Haley acts like it doesn’t even exist. But the big one after that is South Carolina. South Carolina is big in any year‚ but it’s especially big with it being Nikki Haley’s home state‚ serving as former Governor until Trump shipped her out of the country. Also big in South Carolina is Lindsey Graham (although not liked by many in MAGA) but he still holds substantial sway in the Republican Party in that State. And I got to thinking I haven’t heard much from Lindsey Graham in this Primary season so I wanted to see who he’s endorsing….and it’s President Trump!  Very strongly Trump. No one ever said Lindsey Graham was a great human being‚ but he does seem to be a good politician and it’s clear he wants in on the MAGA Train. Here is the endorsement direct from his own Twitter account: It is my hope that we can now all rally around President Trump as the Republican nominee in 2024‚ putting all our resources and energy into bringing the Biden Administration to an end‚ because it has been a disaster on all levels for the American people. — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) January 24‚ 2024 And here‚ making clear it’s not just a vote against other candidates but an endorsement FOR President Trump: I endorsed President Trump early‚ not because of the flaws of others‚ but because I believe President Trump is the best choice to get America back on track. When it comes to President Trump‚ he’s proven he can make America safe and great. — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) January 24‚ 2024 More here: I’m not a big fan‚ but Lindsey Graham IS big in South Carolina and he’s fully backing President Donald John Trump!!! In the 2024 Republican primary‚ Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has been vocal about his support for former President Donald Trump. He endorsed Trump… pic.twitter.com/ER6CkzrM12 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) January 25‚ 2024 Here he is praising President Trump on Fox News: Do you trust him now? Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) praises Trump and explains why he endorsed him over Nikki Haley. He will clean up the mess. WATCH pic.twitter.com/38qHZMsmy2 — Simon Ateba (@simonateba) January 25‚ 2024 Longer clip here: NOW- Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) gives President Trump a glowing review on Fox News‚ claiming; “I endorsed Donald Trump on day one because I saw‚ from a front position‚ four years of the toughest guy I’ve ever seen in Washington‚ who brought the world to a better place on… pic.twitter.com/EG5aAylTYa — Overton (@OvertonLive) January 25‚ 2024 How about you? NATIONAL POLL : Do You Still Support Donald Trump?

The gloves are off! Despite the Supreme Court seemingly ruling with the Biden Administration on the border wall and border defense (more on that down below)‚ Texas is NOT backing down. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is claiming an absolute right of Texas for Self Defense — and he’s 100% right. Take a look: Here is his statement just released: My statement on Texas’ constitutional right to self-defense. pic.twitter.com/seNFZdmujP — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) January 24‚ 2024 Here’s a Zoom-in: Full transcript here if that’s better for you: G O V E R N O R G R E G A B B O T T January 24‚ 2024 The federal government has broken the compact between the United States and the States. The Executive Branch of the United States has a constitutional duty to enforce federal laws protecting States‚ including immigration laws on the books right now. President Biden has refused to enforce those laws and has even violated them. The result is that he has smashed records for illegal immigration. Despite having been put on notice in a series of letters—one of which I delivered to him by hand—President Biden has ignored Texas’s demand that he perform his constitutional duties. President Biden has violated his oath to faithfully execute immigration laws enacted by Congress. Instead of prosecuting immigrants for the federal crime of illegal entry‚ President Biden has sent his lawyers into federal courts to sue Texas for taking action to secure the border. President Biden has instructed his agencies to ignore federal statutes that mandate the detention of illegal immigrants. The effect is to illegally allow their en masse parole into the United States. By wasting taxpayer dollars to tear open Texas’s border security infrastructure‚ President Biden has enticed illegal immigrants away from the 28 legal entry points along this State’s southern border—bridges where nobody drowns—and into the dangerous waters of the Rio Grande. Under President Biden’s lawless border policies‚ more than 6 million illegal immigrants have crossed our southern border in just 3 years. That is more than the population of 33 different States in this country. This illegal refusal to protect the States has inflicted unprecedented harm on the People all across the United States. James Madison‚ Alexander Hamilton‚ and the other visionaries who wrote the U.S. Constitution foresaw that States should not be left to the mercy of a lawless president who does nothing to stop external threats like cartel smuggling millions of illegal immigrants across the border. That is why the Framers included both Article IV‚ § 4‚ which promises that the federal government “shall protect each [State] against invasion‚” and Article I‚ § 10‚ Clause 3‚ which acknowledges “the States’ sovereign interest in protecting their borders.” Arizona v. United States‚ 567 U.S. 387‚ 419 (2012) (Scalia‚ J.‚ dissenting). The failure of the Biden Administration to fulfill the duties imposed by Article IV‚ § 4 has triggered Article I‚ § 10‚ Clause 3‚ which reserves to this State the right of self-defense. For these reasons‚ I have already declared an invasion under Article I‚ § 10‚ Clause 3 to invoke Texas’s constitutional authority to defend and protect itself. That authority is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statute to the contrary. The Texas National Guard‚ the Texas Department of Public Safety‚ and other Texas personnel are acting on that authority‚ as well as state law‚ to secure the Texas border. Greg Abbott Governor of Texas Even Elon Musk replied to Gov. Abbott’s Tweet giving the Governor and State of Texas his full support: Texas is absolutely right. This administration is deliberately breaking the law by aiding and abetting illegal immigration at an unprecedented scale! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 25‚ 2024 And the movement is growing…. Governors from 17 states have come out in full support of Texas and said they support Texas as needed: BREAKING: Governors from seventeen states have now declared that they stand with Texas. pic.twitter.com/dnDle69X7a — Leading Report (@LeadingReport) January 25‚ 2024 Are we about to have a Civil War break out between Federal and the States? Is the Biden Regime so far gone that the states will have to band together to shut down the Federal Government? We’re on that path! While obviously not a border state‚ we’re all one country — here is Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds: When the federal government fails‚ states step in. Iowa sent the Iowa National Guard and State Troopers down to the border last year to stop this invasion. Iowa stands with Texas. https://t.co/I5YKjyKxJt — Gov. Kim Reynolds (@IAGovernor) January 25‚ 2024 Here is Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry standing with Texas: Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry stands with Texas: “Under our Constitution‚ states are still sovereign. We have the right to protect our citizens.” pic.twitter.com/0W7MidV3Y8 — Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) January 25‚ 2024 And while the Supreme Court’s ruling may initially seem bad for Patriots and confusion over why Amy Coney Barrett “flipped”….I had previously written this for some different perspective: EDITOR’S NOTE: the Editorial Board at WLTReport.com believes this is actually the right decision on the law.  And it just might set the stage for President Trump to swiftly build his entire border wall when he is back in office.  The Biden Regime has bad intent and will use this to further weaken the Border‚ but legally speaking Federal Law should prevail when it comes to issues of National Security.  Now instead of certain towns‚ cities or states holding up President Trump‚ now we have another precedent in place that will grease the skids for President Trump to rapidly secure our Border.  Interesting move.  It looks bad on the surface right now‚ but this may be a major decision in Trump’s favor over the next 4 years.

Yes‚ this is a little older clip‚ but I just came across it again and it is stunning. I’ve never seen anyone look more guilty. The body language is off the charts…and the stumbling and rambling answer to what should be a very simple question. Hey Bill‚ is the vaccine safe? I’ll tell you what he didn’t say…..”Yes”. And I feel so bad for everyone who got the Moderna version. Watch this: #genocide #vaccines @JoshWhoX@alex_meechan@Elizabe32413720 pic.twitter.com/HB0ye7GYSG — DELTA 9 (@DELTA9_DELTA9) January 25‚ 2024 Backup version here if needed: Wow…..watch Bill Gates’ reaction when asked: “Is the Vaccine safe?” I’ve never seen anyone look more guilty in my life! Can we get a body language expert to break this down for us please? Very damning. pic.twitter.com/sGbwBs3hq1 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) January 25‚ 2024 Here’s more: FACT-CHECK: Did Bill Gates Really Say “With Vaccines We Can Reduce World Pop By 10-15%”? Time for a Fact-Check! Did he really say it? Did he really mean it? Let’s dig in… In what is perhaps the most stunning quote we’ve ever heard from a man who has said many stunning and horrific things‚ this one goes right to the top of the list. Here is Bill Gates‚ a man with no scientific training of any kind‚ giving a Ted Talk about how he wants to roll out his vaccines world-wide and he thinks if he does a “really good job” he can decrease the human population by 10-15%! He even says it may need to “approach close to zero!” Remember Bill Gates Ted Talk where he said if we do a good job with the mRNA vaccines we will depopulate the world by 10-15%. They are well on their way to achieving that. — Theo Fleury (@TheoFleury14) November 29‚ 2022 Don’t believe me? Just listen for yourself: Bill Gates‚ 2010: “If we do a really good job with new vaccines‚ health care and reproductive health services‚ we can lower that [global population] by 10-15%” pic.twitter.com/WjNudyt0K1 — Robin Monotti (@robinmonotti) January 28‚ 2023 Bill Gates‚2010:“If we do a really good job with new vaccines‚health care and reproductive health services‚ we can lower that[world population]by 10-15%” Incredible how people make up excuses for this‚denying Bill Gates ever said it pic.twitter.com/LSJaTCLVyd — Sophia Dahl (@sophiadahl1) April 15‚ 2023 Sounds pretty clear to me‚ what do you think? Ok‚ here’s one more: Bill Gates‚ 2010: “If we do a really good job with new vaccines‚ health care and reproductive health services‚ we can lower that [world population] by 10-15%” Incredible how people make up excuses for this‚ deny Bill Gates ever said this‚ call up “fact checkers” denying this‚… pic.twitter.com/Lrv0d4jS3N — Diane (@snarky555) April 8‚ 2023 To be fair‚ let’s give the other end of the spectrum…. This young lad‚ Dylan Nolan thinks he just “misspoke”: With all due respect to young Dylan‚ I think you may be a bit young and naiive sir. But you’re entitled to that opinion! Backup here from Bitchute: [iframe src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/cCOlxBfZCN06/” width=”100%” height=”360″] And to those who think Gates just misspoke‚ here is a compilation of ALL the creepy things he’s said about depopulation: Did he just misspeak? Or is the Bible right when it says “out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks”? I think you know the answer. Guess it’s working? Bill Gates: “If we do a really good job with vaccines and reproductive healthcare (sterilize women and abort babies) we can reduce the global population by 15%” pic.twitter.com/PGFlAoceBA — The Humble Genius Pianist (@humbleGenius123) January 5‚ 2023 Oh‚ and you might as well make a few billion along the way too‚ right Bill? Why not? Bill Gates Admits To GROSS Vaccine Profit This is tone-deaf‚ even for Bill Gates. Or as some of you have dubbed him: “Kill Gates”. Because he seems hell-bent on Killing humanity. But even for him‚ this is pretty wild. We found a clip of Bill Gates bragging about how he’s made OVER a 20-t0-1 return on vaccines! Gee‚ I didn’t know you were supposed to profit off of saving lives‚ but congrats Bill! I mean‚ enjoy Hell‚ but congrats! Throwback to when Bill Gates bragged on national television about the huge return on investment in vaccines. pic.twitter.com/xk9qguvoic — Canadian Refusenik (@cdnrefusenik) February 2‚ 2023 And here: Bill Gates has been the devils intern for many years. pic.twitter.com/yKYrWxZXVg — Establishment Eradicator (@wheresourLOGIC) March 23‚ 2023 Now those clips of Gates talking felt edited to me so I searched for the original interview…and I found it! The clips WERE edited‚ but just for time‚ not for content. The clips are 100% accurate. But here’s the deal… The clips are from 2019‚ a year before COVID hit. Gates may be one of the richest people but he isn’t the smartest man in the world‚ and he probably didn’t think that bragging about insane profits on vaccines would be a bad idea. I mean‚ to be honest‚ this was a very bad idea to admit even in 2019 but after COVID?  It really hits bad. Here is a backup of the CNBC clip in case they take it down once they realize how bad of a look it is: Bill Gates admits to making “over a 20-to-1” return on vaccines! pic.twitter.com/Ra4uHZ1WKR — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) March 25‚ 2023 And a backup on Rumble for safe-keeping: Oh‚ and here he is talking about how they really goofed up on COVID… How it wasn’t nearly as dangerous as they thought. You mean like WE TOLD YOU from Day 1? Really? Watch: Bill Gates says right here the Vaccine is more Dangerous than Covid. pic.twitter.com/IjSPy4KE3b — Johnny Midnight (@its_The_Dr) March 23‚ 2023 I also want to ask why he’s speaking like he’s in charge of running the world. Who appointed him World Ruler? Why should he have any involvement in an (alleged) public health crisis? He’s not a doctor… Not a scientist… Not even really a computer scientist… He’s just a dork. Speaking of Bill Gates‚ have you seen this? Here’s his next “venture” Bill Gates and DFID Working To Put The Poison Vaxx In Cattle! Want some mRNA steaks? Would you like your steak well done? Medium? Medium rare? I’m a medium-rare guy at a steakhouse‚ and at a non-steakhouse you have to go rare because they always overcook it.  That’s your pro-tip of the day. But no matter what you choose it’s about to also come with a side of the mRNA poison vaxx! How wonderful! And soon it won’t matter at all because if they can’t inject them all with mRNA‚ they’ll just be gone anyway! Have you seen this? Number Of Beef Cows In The U.S. DROPS To The LOWEST LEVEL Since 1962 — Food Crisis Intensifies **BUT KEEP READING‚ I HAVE THE SOLUTION DOWN BELOW** And who do we have to thank? Why‚ Bill Gates of course! Or as some of you have dubbed him‚ "Kill Gates" as an homage to his penchant for bringing death and destruction seemingly everywhere he goes! Just ask all the little African children he jabbed. But I digress‚ that's a different story. Today I want you to see how proud he looks announcing his new partnership with DFID to jab all our cattle and inject them with the toxin mRNA vaxx. Because: "science". Duh! Watch: Bill Gates explains how he's putting the JAB into our food supply in partnership with DFID. Injecting the cattle! #Evil #Poison #Jab #Vaxx #Cattle pic.twitter.com/VA9swgMR2p — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) February 25‚ 2023 More here: Bill Gates: "Well‚ 'The Gates Foundation' has partnered with DFID on a great number of things - and among those are the work we do together on livestock. Helping animals survive either by having vaccines or better genetics." (Part 3/4) pic.twitter.com/auCTgwObGv — Mad Mac (@Revelation2041) January 12‚ 2023 And longer video here: Look‚ I don't know about you but I don't want mRNA in my meat. I want to eat big‚ beautiful Black Angus RED MEAT the way God made it! The very fact they're trying to poison the meat tells you all you need to know. Meat must be very good for you. Especially meat without antibiotics‚ without growth hormones‚ without chemicals....and definitely without mRNA! But thanks to "Kill Gates" and his friends like Klaus (Anal) Schwab‚ that kind of unadulterated meat is becoming harder and harder to find. Why do the big companies pump the cattle full of all this crap? In Bill Gates' case‚ I think he truly believes in a depopulation agenda. For all the rest? It's business‚ baby!  Big business!  Toxic Big Business! These big companies raise the cattle in stalls with no space in between them. The result? One cow gets sick‚ they all get sick! So to keep the operation going‚ they are constantly pumped full of hormones and antibiotics....and then guess what goes into your body when you eat them? Guess what goes into your kids bodies? Ever wonder why kids are starting puberty at younger and younger ages? Couldn't be related to them eating meat pumped full of cow steroids‚ could it? But enough about the problem.... I NEVER leave you with just the problem. You better know I've got the solution! I'd like to introduce you to Black Angus beef‚ pasture raised on hundreds of thousands of acres. Free roaming with plenty of open air between all the cattle. Grass fed. No hormones and no antibiotics.  Never! Oh‚ and it's CHEAPER than Omaha Steaks! BOOM‚ who loves ya baby! The only "catch"? It's Invite only. Good thing you know someone that has the invites....(me!). If you'd like to find out more and get a FREE personal invite‚ just go here and tell them Noah sent you:  http://bit.ly/3E5K89d It's the real deal‚ and because they don't raise the Black Angus like the big companies do‚ they may have the SHUT OFF invites if they grow too fast. So if you want in‚ let me know soon. It's all part of something bigger I've just started working on. Let me fill you in... When I started this website back in 2015 I started it because I was on a mission... I wanted to get the truth out to as many people as possible. The truth that wasn't being covered anywhere else. I started with literally 0. Zero experience... Zero money... Zero backers... Zero readers... Zero of any of you! Along the way‚ we've built a massive community of people who love America and want to see our country become great again. We now average between 4 and 6 million readers EACH MONTH! And we're growing again‚ pretty quickly. More importantly‚ the MISSION is growing! But we've also faced major opposition. Oh it hasn't been easy by any stretch of the imagination. We were DELETED from Facebook after having 1.5 million people Follow and Love our Page! Just poof....one day‚ gone! We've been censored on almost every platform out there‚ emails sent to Junk or just "disappeared" despite people signing up over and over. Speaking of email‚ we've had two email companies ban us because they went Far-Left. So it hasn't always been easy... But we're on a MISSION and mission always wins out in the end. And today I want to tell you about an expansion of that mission. From Day 1‚ our mission has been about getting the truth out to as many people as we possibly can. But after being deleted‚ banned and censored by almost everyone out there‚ I realized pretty quick that we need a Parallel Economy! We need to stop sending our dollars to the corporations that hate us and want to see us gone! Remember the Georgia Guidestones? They literally told us they wanted to reduce us from 8 billion people on the Earth down to only 500 million. No big deal‚ right? Just an elimination of 94% of all people living right now. And yet we continue to shop at their big stores and send them our money‚ because until now we've had little choice. Well‚ today that changes. And today my mission EXPANDS... And I'm SO excited! Allow me to introduce you to the solution. It's time to "Make The Switch" and change where you send your dollars each month. What if I told you instead of sending your money to Jeff Bezos and Costco and Walmart‚ you could shop at the LAST pro-America‚ freedom-loving‚ American designer‚ manufacturer and shipper of all the stuff you buy each month! Oh‚ and what if I told you the products are BETTER and often CHEAPER? Yes‚ for real. And what if I told you this is the best kept secret you've never heard of before‚ but that this company has been doing this for the last 37 years? And their founder was once placed on Barack Hussein Obama's list of the Top 10 most "Dangerous Conservatives" in America? (a list I one day hope to make myself!) All of that is real and I'm so excited to tell you about it and I hope you'll join the MISSION with me. Here's a quick summary of this company that I'm so excited to now be partnered up with on this mission: Sound good to anyone else? Me too! The reason you've never heard of them is because it's Invite Only. I can get you in‚ but you can't just go sign up. They only want people on the same mission to join and they're happy to say "no" to the Far-Left Libs! They've been doing it for 37 years and it's been working great. Oh‚ and did I mention the products are non-toxic and don't have all the chemicals and crap like Red Dye 40 that all the Big Corporations put in their products to weaken you? To wear you down? To make you -- and your family -- sick? Because then when you get sick you'll buy their drugs! Sorry folks‚ I don't play that game and neither does my family. We're talking the LAST all natural‚ grass fed‚ no hormone‚ massive beef cattle ranch in the United States.... Sound good? We're talking Fluoride Free Toothpaste‚ chemical free cleaners‚ Deet-free mosquito repellant! What novel concepts‚ right? Stop sending you money to these 11 corporations that do NOT have your best interest at heart: It's an ILLUSION of choice. There's only one pro-American‚ American made and manufactured‚ chemical free‚ toxin free‚ hormone free‚ company left....and I'm teaming up with them to FIGHT BACK! Who's with me? Watch this: https://welovetrump.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/maketheswitchraw.mp4 As I said‚ it's Invite Only and the invite is completely free! In fact‚ I've assembled a team of patriots who will personally get you invited and signed up....if you want in. It's called "Patriot Switch" and I think the name says it all. Folks‚ we don't have many strongholds left. This is one. And I'm all in. If you'd like to find out more and get a FREE personal invite‚ just go here:  http://bit.ly/3E5K89d Tell them Noah sent you and I promise you will get a personal call‚ text or email. Don't freak out when you do. And make sure you tell them you are interested in the Black Angus beef! I know I tend to get concerned when I get messages from numbers I don't recognize‚ but if you request a Free Invite (Link here: http://bit.ly/3E5K89d) you WILL have someone from my Inner Circle reach out to you....so be ready! These are awesome people and I think you'll love getting a chance to talk with them. And they'll help get you all set up. Who's with me? - Noah p.s. Since everyone gets personal attention‚ we will take these in the order in which they come in.  So if you are excited‚ ask for your invite now or you might be far down on the list.  I have a great team‚ but they can only do so much and they'll work on a first-come‚ first-served basis. Request a free Invite here:  http://bit.ly/3E5K89d  

Well gee‚ I guess I was wrong…. I was fairly convinced that the 1969 Moon Landings were fake and that as the Bible tells us there is a Firmament surrounding our Earth‚ but turns out I was wrong on both accounts. Sorry Genesis! Yes indeed‚ much like India did last year‚ Japan has now landed on the Moon! How embarrassing that I could be so wrong…. Errrrr‚ uhhhh excuse me‚ my apologies….those prior paragraphs were all written with tongue firmly implanted in cheek! Except for one thing I wrote which was spot on:  Japan’s Moon Landing looks exactly like India’s Moon Landing from last year‚ and by that I mean fake as can be! But that’s just my opinion‚ you decide for yourself…. Here is the footage they are attempting to pass off as real footage from Japan’s Moon Landing: How many gullible people are going to fall for this. OMG#reasearchflatearth #flatearth pic.twitter.com/Pa1dFV7tjd — GlobeStuPid (@CryptoStu3) January 22‚ 2024 It looks EXACTLY like India’s did! Like some 1980s version of Atari Space Invaders! Is that really the best they can do? My Nintendo Switch has better graphics than this! More here‚ this one includes footage from the lander itself as it tumbles towards the Moon: TOFU NEWS: Similar to the Indian Moon landing Japan’s inaugural lunar module has successfully landed on the Moon‚ as reported by Japan’s Aerospace Agency. There is a confirmed connection with the lunar module‚ indicating a likely lunar landing. Final clarifications are… pic.twitter.com/rpBBvynYXf — Jack Straw (@JackStr42679640) January 19‚ 2024 Does that look real to you? I guess we can quote Elon Musk here: “You know it’s real because it looks so fake!” Remember when he said that?  That was a real gem. More footage here‚ and pay particular attention to how they are reporting this — they are not claiming these are simulated videos — they’re saying this is footage of the craft landing on the Moon: Japan has become the fifth country to land a spacecraft on the moon with its ‘sniper’ probe touching down on Friday. However‚ the control room is currently awaiting successful communication with the lander. #moonlanding #Japan pic.twitter.com/j4duTDuJgU — CGTN Europe Breaking News (@CGTNEuropebreak) January 20‚ 2024 More here: Congratulations to Japan – now the 5th country to land successfully on the moon Seraphim Space CEO Mark Boggett appeared on Sky News on Friday. Mark was asked to comment on the Japan moon landing and the growing importance of commercial capital to help government and… pic.twitter.com/jwKCyQWRNA — Seraphim Space (@seraphim_space) January 22‚ 2024 I am apparently not the only person that thinks it looks super fake….or that it looks almost identical to India’s fake footage: Move over India Japan”s turn to fake a moon landing and here it is pic.twitter.com/q8HsUnCyVX — TruthBeTold (@TruthBe53952128) January 19‚ 2024 Backlash from the India footage got so bad last year they DID come out several days later to try to claim it was just a rendering of what it *would have* looked like‚ but by that point the damage was done. But they’re not stopping there…. Here is what they claim is a timelapse video shot from the Moon’s surface: Timelapse video captured by the Japanese lunar orbiter spacecraft Kaguya #MoonLanding #Space #NASA #SpaceWalk #moon #NASA #Starlink#SpaceX #Japan pic.twitter.com/4yLaYWovIR — Inventions (@inventions4uu) January 23‚ 2024 Sorry but it just looks SO fake! And I see we’ve chosen to go with “no stars” in this one. Always funny when they decide to include the stars or not. Here’s what NBC News reported: Japan’s moon lander nailed its tricky‚ “pinpoint” touchdown on the lunar surface‚ officials from the country’s space agency announced Thursday‚ but a newly released image revealed that the spacecraft became overturned in the process. The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency‚ known as JAXA‚ confirmed that the mission achieved its goal of a precision landing within 100 meters (328 feet) of its target — a feat that could broaden the number of potential landing sites for future missions to the moon. With the successful touchdown of the SLIM lander (short for Smart Lander for Investigating Moon)‚ Japan became the fifth country in history to achieve a controlled or “soft” landing on the moon. Only the United States‚ the former Soviet Union‚ China and India can similarly boast about such an accomplishment. The SLIM mission represents another giant leap forward in lunar exploration. A wheeled rover that was released before the SLIM craft landed snapped a photo that appears to show the probe upside-down on the moon’s surface. As such‚ the lander’s solar panels are not angled properly to harness sunlight and power up the probe‚ according to JAXA. The agency said there is still a chance that the lander could recover and generate power as sunlight shifts in the coming days. And from TechCrunch: The Japan Aerospace Exploration Company shared the first image of its lander on the lunar surface‚ revealing that the spacecraft touched down on the moon upside-down. It’s a remarkable recovery for the spacecraft‚ which experienced an “abnormality in the main engine” that affecting the landing orientation when it was just 50 meters above the lunar surface‚ JAXA said in an update Thursday. Despite this abnormality — which resulted in the spacecraft’s solar panels being unable to charge‚ because they are not oriented properly wit the sun — the country nevertheless became the fifth nation ever to pull off a soft landing on the moon. Even after the main engine was lost‚ SLIM’s onboard software continued to autonomously guide the spacecraft’s descent. The lander touched down at a speed of around 1.4 meters per second or less‚ below the design range; but the lateral velocity and orientation were also outside the design range‚ resulting in the nose-down position. Remarkably‚ the lander ended up just 55 meters east of the original target landing site. JAXA officials said that the main purpose of the SLIM mission‚ which was to demonstrate the pinpoint landing technology to within 100 meters accuracy‚ is therefore considered a success. Now let’s have some fun and go back to India’s “Moon Landing”…. Read through this and tell me if this looks identical to what India originally tried to pass off as real footage and later claimed was just simulated images: UPDATE: Did India Fake Its Moon Landing? You want to know a very good indicator that something is‚ in fact‚ FAKE? When all the big Fact-Checkers have to roll out their big “Fact Checks” to tell you it most definitely is not fake because we are Fact-Checkers and we said so! That just happened again. Last week India claimed to have landed on the Moon. Incredible! Historic! The only problem was it gave the world this footage: Many immediately said it looked SUPER fake. Here is Stew Peters calling it out: BREAKING: India FAKES moon landing. pic.twitter.com/nWp58rDwxG — Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) August 23‚ 2023 I also posted that it looked very fake to me. A BAD fake: India’s Moon Landing: Real or Fake? Many clowned the images as saying it looked like a bad 1980's video game. Others named the game as "Space Invaders" -- which was spot on. The "useful idiots" were out in full force saying of course it was real imagery and we all just had "tin foil hats" on. You gotta love the useful idiots. But now after a week of getting clowned bad‚ it looks like they've taken a different approach. Now LeadStories wants you to know this wasn't live footage at all‚ it was just a simulation that was broadcast live: Fact Check: India Did NOT Fake Chandrayaan-3 Landing On The Moon -- A Simulation Image Was Broadcast Live #CurrentEvents #FactCheck #International https://t.co/U9BSmr5I8o — NFN - News Facts Network (@FactsNfn) September 5‚ 2023 Ummmm‚ what? LOL! As usual‚ they go to incredible mental gymnastics to come up with these fact-checks. "A Simulation Image was Broadcast Live"? What does that even mean? But let's Fact-Check the Fact-Checkers because there are a few big problems with this. First‚ none of the live streams of the moon landing labeled that as "simulation" footage. They all said "Livestream". I checked last week and I just re-checked right now. Not a single feed was labeled "Simulation". I guess these Rocket Scientists just forgot that little detail‚ huh? Right. Or is it more likely that they got clowned so hard that they finally had to admit it was fake but claim they intended it to be fake all along? You decide. Here's another problem... LeadStories points to the Stew Peters tweet in its Fact-Check as some sort of proof and even includes screenshots of the Tweet and an Archive Link of the Tweet as if Stew took it down. He never took it down‚ it's still proudly posted. Nice try LeadStories. But here's the really key part. They claim the Stew Peters Tweet was Fact-Checked with a "Community Note" on Twitter‚ and indeed it was -- but not for the reason you'd think. Take a look: So there is a Community Note saying the India Moon Landing was NOT faked because.....wait for it.....because these four sources all tracked it while it happened! So you'd think you'd go to those 4 sources and you'd see live video or you'd see something saying the official video was labeled a simulation‚ but you don't see any of that. All four links are just this....hours and hours of screens that look like mini EKG machines allegedly reading the "sound" of the Moon Lander from space: And by watching hours of blips of sound on the screen that is supposed to be proof the landing was real. You kidding me with this? Something I could make myself in Garage Band on my iMac and post to YouTube and you'd have no idea what it was (kind of like this Chorizo image?) is the "proof" the India Moon Landing was real? Really? But here's my bigger question.... Why doesn't the Community Note simply say that was a Simulation video? Wouldn't that have been a much simpler explanation? But it doesn't say that. Only LeadStories now says that one week later. As your mom probably told you‚ "if you don't lie then you don't need to constantly remember what you said and when you were telling the truth". Good advice. NASA and the MSM should try following it‚ but at this point they're too far gone. Shifting stories‚ shifting sand‚ imploding confidence. One more comment before I wrap this up.... You want to shut people up about all this being fake? How about instead of stupid Garage Band sound readings how about you just strap a GoPro to the window of one of these "space rockets" and give us a FULL FEED of the launch? Go from launchpad to Moon landing with no cuts. Oh you'd think we'd have a bunch of those by now‚ right? But we don't. Not a single one. In fact‚ there's not even a single UNCUT video feed live from a rocket going from launch pad into "Space". None exist. They always "cut out" about halfway through and then "pop back on" once they're in "Space". Don't trust what I say‚ go look it up for yourself‚ see what you find. Oh NASA has a million reasons WHY you can't see that footage. As usual‚ it's just too complicated for us plebs to understand. You're right‚ I don't understand and I don't buy it. If we have the technology to fly to the Moon and ride around on a Dune Buggy‚ we damn sure have the technology to strap a GoPro to a window and record the entire thing. Instead what do we get? We get.....this: You want to shut people up? You want to prove it's real? Save you BS LeadStories "Fact Check" and just show us REAL‚ UNCUT video. Until then‚ I'm going to continue to assume it's all fake. Here was our original report: India's Moon Landing: Real or Fake? I know this happened a couple days ago‚ but I have purposely waited to cover this for a while. I just keep looking at the footage and I am a bit stunned. Do people really think this is real? I suppose I should back up and frame this a bit more objectively: I'm going to show you the footage of India allegedly landing on the Moon this week and I want to know if you think it looks real or fake. There‚ was that better? More objective? I'm trying but I'm sorry‚ this just looks SUPER fake to me. Just watch for yourself and then we'll dig in. From the Indian Express‚ here is the official footage. Start at about the 6:20 minute mark: Here's a different view‚ allegedly from the Lunar Probe. Watch: Ok‚ so first question's first... Those are supposed to be real footage of the same event. At least the second one looks a little more real‚ but why are there (super fake looking) stars in the first one: But no stars seen in the second one? And why can't any of these "space agencies" get their stories straight? Why does NASA tell us it looks like this? “The more you look‚ the more you start to see. You see the stars like you have never seen them before .” Mike Fossum of @NASA_Astronauts shares how he experienced the universe differently during his time orbiting 250 miles above the Earth’s surface: https://t.co/HXZE2gaTZJ pic.twitter.com/4qlG0nBUTR — NASA (@NASA) December 18‚ 2019 And this: Looking out from the @Space_Station‚ Jack Fischer of @NASA_Astronauts saw "billions of stars‚ the Magellanic cloud‚ the galaxies that you can see with your naked eye. And they don't twinkle. They just stare at you. They dare you to come and to explore:" https://t.co/kzrrHFm7SA pic.twitter.com/zdweNoiy5Z — NASA (@NASA) September 9‚ 2020 And why do some Astronauts say they could see stars and some say they couldn't? Were they not briefed on what to say about that question by NASA? Can you see the stars in outer space?The first Astronauts could not see em...#stars#nasa pic.twitter.com/xROWm3bIRb — babyson (@sophiacubes) July 16‚ 2020 I went off on a wild tangent about the stars‚ but that really wasn't the main point. The main point is....why does the Indian Moon Landing video look so wildly FAKE? I know‚ I know Elon...."you can tell it's real because it looks so fake": Space Tesla hoax pic.twitter.com/nIHOOHOyhP — Natasha M (@Mishtrash) February 11‚ 2023 Now there's a reason why I started this article with the official Indian News feed for the Moon Landing footage. Because if I showed you the Tweets first you'd claim it wasn't real. But it is and it looks wildly fake: India recently landed on the moon - This is the footage of it happening Are you guys skeptical or is it just me?#IndiaMoonLanding pic.twitter.com/bJs9RyyESz — Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE - DAD (@bambkb) August 26‚ 2023 It looks MORE fake than the NASA footage from the 1960s and 70s. Basically‚ this guy is spot on: Some people might say that it’s NOT the real footage? But it is!! Prime minister of India Narendra Modi and others congratulate the video and landing#IndiaMoonLanding pic.twitter.com/3oFAYTkzeb — Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE - DAD (@bambkb) August 26‚ 2023 This guy says it looks like 1980s Pacman‚ but I disagree. Pacman looked SHARP. This is way worse: The NASA Moon Landing Hoax version Bollywood India "has become the 4th country ever to land a spacecraft on the moon" according to the Vermin in the Media LOL! Please tell me it's a joke‚ the whole thing looks like a 1980's Pacman video game. pic.twitter.com/CMi1SWZksd — Antonio Tweets (@AntonioTweets2) August 24‚ 2023 I love watching the reaction videos: Oh My Days! India On The Moon?? pic.twitter.com/Cs9wgFwnJu — PaulsCorner21 (@TNTJohn1717) August 24‚ 2023 Pacman was not quite right‚ but I gotta say "Space Invaders" is 100% spot on: Breathtaking footage of India's rocket ship landing on the moon… Space invaders anyone? pic.twitter.com/0pOH3sJdMq — CtrlAltDelete (@TakingoutTrash7) August 25‚ 2023 They are getting clowned SO HARD I have to be explicitly clear and tell you this video below is NOT the official video. I know they look similar‚ but they're not the same thing: Amazing. India has landed on the moon. pic.twitter.com/RcVdm868RB — Jan Jensen (@annallan72) August 29‚ 2023 This guy calls it "Low Tech CGI" and I think that's a good summary: Something is up with outer space Seriously‚ look at this OFFICIAL footage of a moon landing out of India It's low-tech CGIThe Chinese one in the thread below is just as ridiculous.And why haven't we been back to the Moon since the Apollo landings? QUESTION EVERYTHING! pic.twitter.com/osynOyYc8h — Epstein's Sheet. (@meantweeting1) August 25‚ 2023 Very low tech. Low tech and low budget. Did you see Modi after the lander touched down? Did you notice how he didn't clap right away? I think he knew how absolutely fake it looked and he couldn't even bring himself to clap for a few seconds. I think if you could have read his mind it would have said something like: "Are you freaking kidding me?  This is the footage they are showing to the world?  This is the best we could do?  I am so embarrassed right now...." I love this guy's recap video: Let’s recap the India moon landing.. Must Watch pic.twitter.com/oeCFDq0Nx7 — 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲 â‘  (@FredDiBiase247) August 24‚ 2023 "It looks so authentic!" Now let's keep going... Let's leave India for a second and come a little closer to home: "Was The NASA Moon Landing Fake?" Was the Moon Landing Fake? That's not my question... That was Patrick Bet-David's question to Avi Loeb‚ the author of "Interstellar". I found the clip to be very fascinating. The short answer from Avi? No. The reason? Moon Rocks. Yes‚ really. I'll let you watch below‚ but what I find most compelling is exactly what PBD brings up when he questions Loeb. To me‚ the single-most compelling question or piece of evidence is not camera angles‚ or "wrong shadows" in old footage‚ or foot prints on the moon‚ or strange landscapes... All of that is interesting‚ but to me it's not the PRIME thing. To me‚ the primary question is a simple and basic one: why did we (we meaning all of Earth) go to the Moon in 1969 and then just never go back for over 50 years? Have we EVER gone back? Many say we haven't. So....did we really go the first time? THAT is the question. Watch Pat ask Ari: It's actually not the first time PBD has gone down this road. Pat is a smart guy....VERY smart. Intuitive. I think he knows something is very wrong here. Check out his prior interview with Bart Sibrel. I think from that interview to this latest one with Ari‚ I sense Pat becoming more and more skeptical of the original Moon Landing story. Maybe that's just me‚ but I can feel it. Pat was skeptical to Bart about his claims it was fake‚ but flash forward and Pat now seems much more skeptical of the original story itself. Check it out: FACT CHECKED: So We Never Actually Landed On The Moon? Earlier today I was joking around on Twitter and I posted this Tweet below... Read this. But read it slowly: Call me a conspiracy theorist‚ but I am convinced we never landed a man on the sun. #ProveMeWrong — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) March 4‚ 2023 If you don't get it‚ read it again. It's a joke. A stolen joke‚ I admit it. It was a throwaway joke from the inimitable Norm Macdonald. Miss that guy so much‚ but at least we have YouTube. Anyway‚ back to the serious topic at hand. While I was joking in the tweet above‚ a very serious question remains: Did we truly go to the moon back in 1969? I smell a FACT-CHECK coming! Now you might think that's a crazy question‚ but if you start to dig into it you quickly realize there is a very logical‚ rational‚ and evidence-based argument to claim that no‚ we did not. COULD not have done it even if we wanted to! So I wanted to show this interview to you. This is Patrick Bet David‚ a guy who I've really come to respect. PBD plays it right down in the middle in this one‚ challenging his guest Bart Sibrel but doing it respectfully and allowing him to state his case. And his case is remarkable clear. Some people get caught up in analyzing the photos and the shadows and all this other nonsense or the reflections in the glass and claiming it was faked because of some really hard to follow technical details. Sibrel doesn't do that. He simply states a very clear and logical case that goes like this: In order to believe we landed on the moon in 1969 you have to believe this simple claim: That we went 1‚000 times FARTHER than we can currently send astronauts today... 50 years ago... On the first attempt... With one-millionth the computing power of today's cell phone! In fact‚ Werner von Braun‚ the lead scientist of the space mission for NASA‚ stated the odds of them going to the moon‚ successfully‚ with 1960s technolgoy‚ was a 1 in 10‚000 chance! That's your lead brainiac saying that! There is no other example in history where we achieved a technological advancement and then 50 years later could not replicate it. No other example in history. In every other example‚ we are not only replicating it but exceeding it just a few years later. Certainly‚ 50 years later the advancement from that first breakthrough is many multiples greater. And yet‚ not so with the moon. We haven't been back. No other country has been back. In fact‚ NASA now says the technology to do it "hasn't been invented yet!" Why? Because there's a massive thing called the Van Allen Radiation Belts that would cook you alive! The clip of the NASA rocket scientist saying that is right in the video below. So without further adieu‚ I give you Patrick Bet David asking Bart Sibrel: was the moon landing FAKED? Watch here: #PatrickBetDavid #Valuetainment Mirror: https://t.co/V3KpF58Q5E pic.twitter.com/WreMnbXDw7 — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) March 5‚ 2023 Backup here: If that caught your attention‚ let's go much deeper... A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon... WARNING!  WARNING! Time for another installment of hard-hitting investigative journalism...where we aren't afraid to create a little cognitive dissonance along the way! Some of you will be very bothered by this article... "How dare he question the moon landings!" Sorry folks‚ but we don't create the news here...we just report on it. We also don't create the "truth"...we just seek it out and set it free. So buckle up buttercup‚ this could get bumpy for a few of you. I can already hear many others saying "it's about time Noah covered this!" So here we go.... Did Buzz Aldrin just admit (again) that the moon landings were faked? Well‚ it sure looks like it. But we'll give you all the evidence and let you decide. A clip of Buzz Aldrin on Conan O'Brien's Late Night Show from 2000 is suddenly going viral right now thanks to this post on TikTok: @msmastafoxx Wait Til The End... #MsMastaFoXX #MyCreatorLife #Buzz #buzzaldrin #Nasa #Conspiracy #conspiracytiktok #Woketok #Viral #fyp #conanobrien #MoonLanding ♬ original sound - MsMastaFoXXNeocodeistCF In the clip‚ Buzz pretty clearly says the video of the astronauts walking on the moon was fake. I don't know how else you interpret that. I mean‚ I know this is a comedy show‚ but nothing about this clip appears to be a joke or a bit. Even Conan is taken aback and temporarily at a loss for how to respond (and it's his job to never be caught off guard as a talk show host). So watch the clip for yourself. And for anyone shouting "CONTEXT!" I've got you covered. Here is the full interview to watch the segment in context: The Reuters Fact-Check team has already investigated and determined what you heard Buzz say is totally "False". Just another one we all got wrong! God bless the fact-checkers‚ I don't know where we'd be without them! So somehow they've labeled this as "False" despite the part I bolded below where they seem to even admit that the footage is‚ in fact‚ mostly made of animations. This is their full report: Social media users are sharing a video of astronaut Buzz Aldrin being interviewed by American television host Conan O’Brien and claiming that Aldrin discussing parts of the moon landing broadcasts being animated is proof that it was all faked. He was referring to animations used by broadcasters at the time in their coverage of the moon landing‚ intercut with real footage. The moon landing did take place and men did walk on the moon. Examples of the erroneous social media posts can be seen ( here ) and ( here ). A longer video of the interview‚ dated May 17‚ 2000‚ can be seen on YouTube ( here ). At the 1:29 mark‚ O’Brien says: “Let’s talk about this because this is fascinating. I remember very clearly; I think anybody who was alive at the time does. I remember my parents waking me up and we went down‚ and we watched you guys land on the moon.” Aldrin responds: “No‚ you didn’t. Because there wasn’t any television‚ there wasn’t anybody taking the picture. You watched animation so you associated what you saw with… you heard me talking about‚ you know‚ how many feet we’re going to the left and right and then I said contact light‚ engine stopped‚ a few other things and then Neil said ‘Houston‚ tranquility base. The Eagle has landed.’ How about that? Not a bad line.” The moon landing took place on July 20‚ 1969 with astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. NASA said in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20‚ 1969‚ landing. However‚ in 2009 NASA released a complete digital make-over of the original landing footage that clarifies the blurry and grainy images of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the surface of the moon ( here ). A video compiled by CNN shows the available footage from the mission ( here )‚ including takeoff and the astronauts climbing down and walking on the moon. An article ( here ) by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum explains the challenges of recording footage of the moon landing and walking. NASA contracted with Westinghouse for a black and white camera costing $2.29 million to capture the iconic moment‚ according to the museum. Photographs of the camera‚ which was stored in the lunar module’s Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly near the ladder Armstrong can be seen climbing down‚ can be seen ( here ). “For us today‚ we can thank technicians for having recorded the broadcast‚ though the tapes assumed to be of the highest quality were never located despite searches for them in the last few decades‚” the article reads. “What we see now on YouTube or in films are high definition scans of those best available copies.” An article by Vox ( here ) says some television networks built sets to recreate some of the moments that were not able to be captured on video. The National Science and Media Museum discussed the Apollo 11 broadcast on its website ( here ): “Many broadcasters used simulations to flesh out their Apollo programming. Networks paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for scale models of Apollo command modules and rockets. During the broadcast‚ these were used to create simulations of the mission which were then intercut with real footage.” “The thing to remember is what news was like in the late 1960’s‚ not 24-hour continuous coverage‚” Margaret Weitekamp‚ Chair of the Space History Department at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum‚ said by phone. “The coverage of that trip needed to be explained to the public without the ability for continuous relay of video we are now used to.” “Animations would have been a part of a constellation of different ways that that story was told over a series of days. At the time‚ the coverage would have been combined with animations that helped provide a broader picture of what was being done. But this certainly doesn’t invalidate that those landings took place.” There is no evidence that the moon landing was faked or that astronauts did not walk on the moon. However‚ there is plenty of evidence that it happened. Reports about the landing can be seen ( here )‚ ( here ) and ( here ). Photographs of the moon landing can be seen ( here )‚ ( here )‚ and ( here ). Reuters has previously debunked claims that the moon landing was faked ( here )‚ ( here )‚ ( here ). VERDICT False. Astronaut Buzz Aldrin explaining that broadcasters used animations during their coverage of the moon landing does not prove that it was faked. But that's far from the first time Buzz has seemed to admit the whole thing was a fake. You have to wonder if on his death bed Buzz will finally and unequivocally confess to the fake? Watch this clip on Rumble where an 8-year old girl asks Buzz why we never went back to the moon after 1972... A GREAT question! Because there is no other example in recorded history where something new was discovered and then we just stopped going there. Imagine discovering America in 1492 and then the Europeans just decided to never send another boat. Right‚ didn't happen. Would never happen. Doesn't pass the smell test. So watch this short clip where Buzz says the reason we never went back is because we never went in the first place! It must have felt good to finally get that off his chest I guess? And again‚ if you want the full context and full interview‚ I have that here: Oh‚ then there was this gem... Bart Sibrel (more on him in a minute) caught Buzz one day out on the street and he asked him something simple: swear on this Bible that you actual went to the moon. Buzz becomes visibly agitated and then punches Bart in the face. Watch: https://twitter.com/HaymakerHub/status/1528208649306390528 Cause that's normal‚ right? For more on Bart‚ his book Moon Man is a must read: Bart is most famously known for his film: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon. For anyone who believes the moon landings are 100% real and beyond any reproach‚ I challenge you to watch this 45 minute video and then report back to me. I've never heard from anyone who has watched this and not had their eyes opened: Backup here (since that will likely get taken down by the Tube): And one more backup here: Now let's examine the big Press Conference Buzz‚ Neil and the third guy had when they got back from WALKING ON THE FREAKING MOON! You'd think they'd have smiles from ear to ear that simply wouldn't wipe off...right? You know‚ something like how Sir Edmund Hillary looked after climbing Mount Everest -- see below: Look at how happy sir Edmund Hillary is and Tenzing Norgay they just climbed mount EverestLook at buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong and Mike Collins they look like they were at a funeral they are obviously lying at this press conference they never went to the moon.They know the lie pic.twitter.com/mEqjsPTfYH — Persia اریایی (@roya21042019) February 16‚ 2022 Nope! Instead they looked like this... You might say they looked exactly as you or I might look if you had just faked a Moon Landing and deceived and entire nation. But that's just my take‚ you be the judge. Do these look like guys who just walked on the Moon? Buzz Aldrin &; Neil Armstrong at the first press conference after returning to Earth. Three truth tellers. The look of confidence‚ honesty &; pure happiness after the greatest accomplishment in modern history. Wow! These guys are my idols. pic.twitter.com/1onOk2IeAk — An0maly (@LegendaryEnergy) August 18‚ 2019 You can watch the whole solemn press conference here on Rumble -- it's stunning: So...did Neil and Buzz and the third guy really walk on the Moon? Or was it all faked? And if it was faked‚ was it faked because....it has to be? Perhaps because there is a FIRMAMENT over our world‚ like Genesis tells us? It's literally in the first 7 verses of the Bible‚ almost as if God wanted to make it pretty hard to miss? Genesis 1: 7 And God made the firmament‚ and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. 9 And God said‚ Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place‚ and let the dry land appear: and it was so. Almost as if we couldn't be through the firmament‚ let alone get to the Moon‚ even if we wanted to? If this is blowing your mind‚ then I'm only getting started. Please keep reading... Biblical Trees Beyond the Ice Wall…? Our governments and the so-called "Elites" have lied to us for a long time about just about everything‚ and I think it's HIGHLY likely that they are lying to us about the shape of the Earth and the nature of where we live. Everyone still ok? Did we lose anyone? Well buckle up buttercup because it's about to get wild! This article is probably going to be one of the most controversial things I have posted in a long time. And I'm ok with that. I know some people will judge a book by its cover and immediately write this off‚ but I give you one caution before you do... There is a famous quote I'd like to share with you that has been attributed to many different people over time‚ so I'm not sure who said it first‚ but it goes like this: There is a principle which is a bar against all information‚ which is proof against all arguments‚ and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation. Powerful. Read that again and let it sink in. If you want to remain in ignorance‚ write off an idea before you even look into it.  Surefire way to stay uninformed. So let me begin with a question: Why is no one allowed to go to Antarctica? Oh sure you can go‚ but only to a few selection locations.  And NO further.  And only with a guide. Why is that? Why is it so important to protect whatever's down there? Why have all the countries of the world signed on to a treaty about Antarctica? Yes‚ even Russia and Ukraine‚ who are currently engaged in WW:III have agreed on one thing: something VERY important is down in Antarctica and we have to protect it and prevent anyone from going and exploring. Why is that? What could possibly be so important about ice? Unless of course if they have lied to us about the shape of the Earth? Unless Antarctica is not at the bottom of the "globe" but actually makes up the ring surrounding it? Sounds crazy at first until you begin to investigate‚ and it very quickly becomes something that has you scratching your head. Let's start with this video: Biblical Trees Beyond the Ice Wall…. pic.twitter.com/fzsN79IN0T — PaulsCorner21 (@TNTJohn1717) October 8‚ 2022 Think that's just some crazy Tik Tok video? It's not. You're probably familiar with Answers In Genesis‚ right? They do NOT espouse a "flat Earth" world view‚ but they did publish this article titled:  "Stumped By Forests in Antarctica". Here is a portion: Forests in Antarctica? This frigid‚ forbidding continent is full of surprising evidences for the worldwide flood. Is Antarctica on your bucket list of vacation destinations? It’s on mine! What could possibly be of interest in Antarctica? After all‚ the continent at the bottom of the world is covered in ice and snow‚ and the temperatures are always below freezing. As the coldest‚ driest continent‚ it has one of the harshest environments on the planet and harbors a world of extremes. Turbulent winds and snowstorms can last days and even weeks‚ and the endless barren terrain makes Antarctica the world’s largest desert! For half the year it’s a polar summer‚ when the unforgiving sun shines 24/7. Then‚ during the six months of the polar winter‚ the continent plunges into complete darkness. So why would I be interested in visiting Antarctica? Well‚ to see rocks‚ of course! I’m a geologist. Unlike the Arctic‚ which is simply an ice sheet floating on the ocean‚ Antarctica is composed of rock covered in ice and snow. Huge jagged mountain ranges jut up through nearly a mile of ice and snow‚ exposing rocks with all sorts of treasures‚ if you know what to look for. Just two summers ago‚ a team was surprised to discover not just one but five “forests” piled on top of each other. They claimed the supposedly 260-million-year-old fossils represent a series of different forests that grew slowly and were buried one on top of the other over millions of years. They were looking for clues to understand how climate changes contributed to their extinction. Finding such mysteries then putting them in the biblical perspective is why I love my profession and want to visit places most people would never consider. Found—Fossil “Forests” of a Strange Extinct Plant The team was led by Erik Gulbranson‚ a professor of geosciences at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee‚ who set up camp in the central Transantarctic Mountains. They found several layers of tree stumps buried upright with parts of their roots still connected. They also found impressions of long‚ broad‚ flat leaves jumbled together in massive mats.1 These remains have been identified as fossils of an unusual extinct plant called Glossopteris‚ which is unlike any plant alive today. Pieces of this plant are commonly found in large Permian coal beds that are mined throughout the southern hemisphere‚ such as in Australia and South Africa. The discovery of these plants wasn’t the big surprise. In previous expeditions the same team found similar “fossil” forests in the same rock unit in the central Transantarctic Mountains. Lab studies confirmed that all the fossil wood specimens belonged to the same genus‚ Glossopteris. But their earlier analysis uncovered a surprise. The long-held assumption was that the Glossopteris plant was strictly deciduous (meaning its leaves drop annually in the autumn). Scientists made this assumption because they usually find their fossil leaves in mats‚ similar to thick mats on the floors of modern deciduous forests. The new analysis showed they were a mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. How could this be? Based on their evolutionary assumptions about slow changes over millions of years‚ scientists suggested a possible explanation. They claimed that earth’s cooling climate had forced these late Permian polar forests to adapt to environmental stresses. The accumulation of these stresses ultimately caused their extinction. There's a lot more out there than your government is telling you! And of THAT I am 100% confident. Here's another one‚ from the Christian Times: A Christian geologist has argued that the recent discovery of fossilized tree stumps in Antarctica confirms the Bible's account of a global Flood. Live Science reported last month that a team of scientists led by Erik Gulbranson‚ a paleoecologist at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee‚ had discovered a forest of fossil trees in Antarctica‚ which is said to be an indication that the climate was warmer there in the past. While the researchers have not dated the forest precisely yet‚ they surmised that it flourished about 280 million years ago before it was rapidly buried in volcanic ash‚ which preserved it down to the cellular level. However‚ Dr. Tim Clarey‚ a research associate at the Institute for Creation Research (ICR)‚ contended that the fossilized trees are more consistent with the Biblical account of a global flood just thousands of years ago. "This discovery should be no surprise to those who take Genesis as literal history. The Bible clearly describes a global Flood that affected all land masses—why should Antarctica be an exception?" he wrote in an article published on ICR's website. Clarey explained that dinosaur and mosasaur (massive swimming reptiles) fossils are found on every continent including Antarctica‚ which he says suggests that a much warmer global climate existed before the Great Flood. He further noted that some creationists have tried to explain the presence of temperate climate fossils in Antarctica by claiming that the Earth had "rolled" on its axis during the Flood‚ resulting in the North Pole shifting from central Asia to its present position. But Clarey pointed out that the temperate and tropical-type flora and fauna fossils‚ like dinosaurs‚ can also be found in central China — which he said would have been the north pole if the earth indeed rolled on its axis. He contended that the entire globe was warmer before the global Flood and that the forces that are required to explain the shift on the Earth's axis has not been resolved and remains a speculation. Gulbranson‚ who specializes in geochemistry techniques‚ noted that the plants found in Antarctica were so well-preserved that some of the amino acid building blocks that made up the trees' proteins can still be extracted. Clarey argued that the secular science community cannot provide a viable explanation for such discoveries. "How could proteins and original amino acids survive for millions of years?" he asked. "These trees were buried rapidly during the global Flood described in Genesis. Temperate and tropical plants and animals were caught up and quickly buried in the ash‚ mud‚ and sand that engulfed them in this cataclysmic event. These fossils remind us that God's Word is true‚" he went on to say. Another video: https://www.tiktok.com/@cardeecuebrav1/video/7118792799650106670?is_from_webapp=v1&;item_id=7118792799650106670&;lang=en But....but....we went to the Moon! How can this be? Right‚ about that: Mars vs Greenland…. pic.twitter.com/SVrA2bTc7r — PaulsCorner21 (@TNTJohn1717) October 9‚ 2022 And this: Buzz Slipped Up Again - Part 1 pic.twitter.com/pj8aAy2wxG — PaulsCorner21 (@TNTJohn1717) October 10‚ 2022 And this: Buzz Slipped Up Again - Part 2 pic.twitter.com/Npmw5TQbCw — PaulsCorner21 (@TNTJohn1717) October 10‚ 2022 Let's go back to the Bible: The earth is a topographical level plane where the sun‚ moon and stars circle above us. Research #flatearth pic.twitter.com/kkOpSvHTk7 — Flat Earth Zone (@FlatEarthZone) October 9‚ 2022 And now let's go to my friend Dave Weiss. I had a brand new guest on my show recently over at The Daily Truth Report...Dave Weiss who goes by the name "Flat Earth Dave". If you got a little triggered at what I just typed‚ go back up and read that quote again. Because here's the deal... My mission here from Day 1 has always been to follow the truth anywhere we find it. And that is never more true than when the truth we find is (1) in direct conflict with what the powers-that-be want you to think and (2) in complete alignment with the Bible. And that's what we have here. Mind blown yet? We're only just getting started.       and open I don't love the term "Flat Earth" because it carries with it a lot of mockery and nonsense‚ but I do like the term "Biblical Model of the Earth". I also like doing my own research. Dave and I chatted for over an hour and my goal was just to ask questions and open up the topic in a way that might lead many people to realize this isn't crazy at all -- and in fact‚ is much more legitimate than you may have ever imagined. Some of the things we discussed are why can a compass only point north?  Ever wondered that?  If a compass is just a magnet‚ why do they only point north‚ why never a compass that points south? Unless...it were not possible? We break it down in the video. We also talk about why perhaps the Georgia Guidestones HAD to be demolished right now... Why? Because they had a hole in the center that always lined up to the north star. The only problem with that? Science has been telling us the north star shifts each year by small degrees‚ but enough that over the 40 years that Guidestones were up that the hole should no longer have lined up -- not even close. Except....it still did. Perfectly aligned. Almost as if we lived on a still‚ flat Earth‚ with the sun‚ moon and stars set above us -- exactly the way the Bible describes. My favorite part was when we looked at the emergency landing of airplanes. This is the one I think will probably open the most eyes. Sixteen different examples of planes making emergency landings and guess what? By their normal flight plans‚ they landed in places they should not have been anywhere close to. Except...if you look at a Flat Earth model of the world‚ then they landed almost exactly where they were supposed to be‚ in a direct line flight path. Sixteen of them! I could go on and on‚ but I want to turn you loose to watch this one yourself. Remember the principal from above before you watch: There is a principle which is a bar against all information‚ which is proof against all arguments‚ and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation. You can watch here on Rumble: And for those YT fans... Here on YouTube (if they keep it up): You can find Dave online here: Direct Link to The Flat Earth Sun‚ Moon &; Zodiac Clock app - https://qrco.de/bbizVA Social Media Profiles: Website - https://www.FlatEarthDave.com Twitter - https://twitter.com/thefepodcast/ Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/theflatearthpodcast/ Facebook - https://facebook.com/theflatearthpodcast/ YouTube Channel: DITRH (Deep Inside The Rabbit Hole) https://www.youtube.com/c/DITRH/videos And now I'd like to dig in even more to what the BIBLE has to say about the place we live... Through and through‚ the Bible describes a still‚ stationary‚ flat plane. But don't just take my word for it. I want to give you some extra info from Rob Skiba who was an absolute genius when it came to this. First‚ I want to address why this is even important in the first place. Good question‚ right? Why would yours truly even be spending any time on this? From Rob Skiba's TestingTheGlobe he answers that really well: Before we begin‚ I must say it quite literally astounds me that Christians can't see why this Flat Earth Controversy is important to nail down. Why does this matter? Well‚ just off the top of my head: 1) Genesis is the foundation of ALL that we believe in the Bible to be true. If Genesis is wrong‚ then it ALL crumbles under a faulty foundation. Genesis says NOTHING - zip‚ zero‚ nadda - about the Earth being set in motion (orbit or rotation) around the sun. In fact‚ the sun doesn't even show up until AFTER the Earth is already in place with life ALREADY in existence. Genesis says the sun‚ moon and stars were placed INSIDE the SAME firmament within which that Earth was formed‚ not outside of it. Thus‚ we have a completely enclosed system‚ within which the sun‚ moon and stars move‚ NOT the Earth. You can Yoga-Jujitsu-Wrestle Mania twist and distort the text into pretzels all you want‚ but it won't change what it says. 2) IF what we are seeing concerning the Flat Enclosed Earth thesis is true‚ then we are all there is. We are center stage. We are the main attraction and there can be NO argument as to whether or not there is a Creator. None. His existence could not possibly become more blatantly obvious than in this model. 3) IF the Flat Enclosed Earth thesis is true‚ evolution goes out the window and the theory of Ancient Alien seeders is obliterated. In this regard‚ I believe we become painfully aware of the Great Deception... and will NOT be fooled by it. 4) IF the Flat Enclosed Earth thesis is true‚ then we can NOT EVER trust NASA or the government about ANYTHING and we will finally be forced to fully trust YHWH's Word as our sole source for truth and stop trying to bend and manipulate it to fit false paradigms. 5) If heliocentricity IS false‚ then Scripture IS true. If Scripture IS true‚ and can thus be taken literally‚ why should we not take it just as literal when it describes the earth as fixed‚ not moving‚ set on a foundation of pillars‚ carved as a "circle" with edge boarders inside something with four corners‚ enclosed under a dome? The next question often tied to the first one is "Why would anyone lie about this?" Again Skiba answers: Along with those emotions comes an all too common question: Why?? What’s the motivation to lie to us about the shape and nature of our world? To me‚ the motivation is quite clear: 1) First get people to doubt YHWH's Word by destroying the very foundation of our Bible: Genesis - specifically the Creation account. 2) Set up a new paradigm‚ where God is out and "science" is in. Evolution removes YHWH from the equation. 3) When evolution finally runs its course and becomes utterly bankrupt‚ introduce the idea of "Intelligent Design" but deny the True Designer His due credit and place it rather on "Ancient Aliens." 4) Promote the Ancient Alien theme as much as possible in all forms of media by perpetuating the concept of Earth as a tiny "blue marble" orbiting an average sun in an average galaxy among trillions of other galaxies in an ever expanding Universe. With so much "potential for life to exist" in such a vast expanse‚ the idea of alien scientists being our creators seems a lot more plausible over time and heavy indoctrination. 5) The stage is set for our "alien creators" to return and bestow upon us their "miracles‚ signs and wonders" in order to convince us all the more that all religions are false. We then put our trust in them. Finally‚ when Christ does return‚ we are all convinced that He is the enemy and our united world gathers together to make war with Him. Wow‚ sound familiar? Sound like anything currently happening the world? It does to me. I said earlier that the Bible is a "flat earth book" through and through. Now let me back that up. Again from Skiba's TestingTheGlobe‚ I give you all relevant scriptures: Scriptures concerning the nature of the heavens/sky above and their relationship to the earth: Job 9: 6 Which shaketh the earth out of her place‚ and the pillars thereof tremble. 7 Which commandeth the sun‚ and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars. 8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens‚ and treadeth upon the waves of the sea. Job 22:14 Thick clouds are a covering to him‚ that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit {Hebrew: "chug"} of heaven. Job 22:14 (HCSB) Clouds veil Him so that He cannot see‚ as He walks on the circle of the sky. Job 22:14 (ASV) Thick clouds are a covering to him‚ so that he seeth not; And he walketh on the vault of heaven. Job 26: 7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place‚ and hangeth the earth upon nothing. 8 He bindeth up the waters in his thick clouds; and the cloud is not rent under them. 9 He holdeth back the face of his throne‚ and spreadeth his cloud upon it. 10 He hath compassed the waters with bounds‚ until the day and night come to an end. 11 The pillars of heaven tremble and are astonished at his reproof. 12 He divideth the sea with his power‚ and by his understanding he smiteth through the proud. 13 By his spirit he hath garnished the heavens; his hand hath formed the crooked serpent. Job 37:18 Hast thou with him spread out the sky‚ which is strong‚ and as a molten looking glass? Genesis 1: 1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was without form‚ and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God said‚ Let there be light: and there was light. 4 And God saw the light‚ that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the light Day‚ and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. 6 And God said‚ Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters‚ and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the firmament‚ and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. Genesis 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life‚ in the second month‚ the seventeenth day of the month‚ the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up‚ and the windows of heaven were opened. Genesis 8:2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped‚ and the rain from heaven was restrained; 2 Samuel 22:8 Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations of heaven moved and shook‚ because he was wroth. Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Psalm 29:10 The LORD sitteth upon the flood; yea‚ the LORD sitteth King for ever. Psalm 78: 21 Therefore the Lord heard this‚ and was wroth: so a fire was kindled against Jacob‚ and anger also came up against Israel; 22 Because they believed not in God‚ and trusted not in his salvation: 23 Though he had commanded the clouds from above‚ and opened the doors of heaven‚ 24 And had rained down manna upon them to eat‚ and had given them of the corn of heaven. 25 Man did eat angels' food: he sent them meat to the full. Psalm 104: 1 Bless the Lord‚ O my soul. O Lord my God‚ thou art very great; thou art clothed with honour and majesty. 2 Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain: 3 Who layeth the beams of his chambers in the waters: who maketh the clouds his chariot: who walketh upon the wings of the wind: Psalm 148:4 Praise him‚ ye heavens of heavens‚ and ye waters that be above the heavens. Proverbs 8:27 When he prepared the heavens‚ I was there: when he set {Hebrew: "chaqaq"} a compass {Hebrew: "chug"} upon the face of the depth: Proverbs 8:27 (ESV) When He established the heavens‚ I was there‚ When He inscribed a circle on the face of the deep. Isaiah 13:13 Therefore I will shake the heavens‚ and the earth shall remove out of her place‚ in the wrath of the Lord of hosts‚ and in the day of his fierce anger. Isaiah 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth‚ and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain‚ and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in: Isaiah 40:22 (ISV) He's the one who sits above the disk of the earth‚ and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers. He's the one who stretches out the heavens like a curtain‚ and spreads them like a tent to live in‚ Isaiah 44:24 Thus saith the Lord‚ thy redeemer‚ and he that formed thee from the womb‚ I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself; Isaiah 45:12 I have made the earth‚ and created ma