Deluxe edition of 'Definitely Maybe' includes previously unheard versions of classic songs and outtakes. Continue reading…

GALATIANS 1 Galatians 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:Galatians 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.Galatians 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any…

KJP: Why Should Biden Use Executive Orders To Secure The Border? [VIDEOS]

Salvador Dalí had a lot of interesting things to say about art, ambitions, and more.

The rock and roll arse chord. The post What’s That Sound? Examining Sting’s half-arsed mistake on The Police song ‘Roxanne’ first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

Love them or hate them, Brussels sprouts are a fascinating vegetable. Let's dive into some fun facts you might not know about these little brassicas.

Fans of Netflix's "Barbecue Showdown" had to wait about three years between Seasons 1 and 2. Thankfully, the wait for Season 3 will be much shorter.

The majority of illegal migrants earmarked for deportation from the German state of Saxony-Anhalt last year either absconded or thwarted attempts in the courts. Of the total number of illegal migrants earmarked for deportation from the German state of Saxony-Anhalt last year, only a fraction were successfully carried out, the state’s interior minister has revealed. In response to a parliamentary question from a left-wing lawmaker, the CDU Interior Minister Tamara Zieschang noted how just 535 of the 1,848 planned repatriations of illegal migrants to their country of origin were successfully achieved in 2023 — just under 29 percent of all cases. The minister explained how in 565 cases, the would-be deportee had absconded and could not be located, while 354 cases involved legal attempts to thwart deportation proceedings or administrative failures in providing the necessary paperwork. A further 205 illegal migrants were rejected by their country of origin, and in 46 cases the concerned individual evaded deportation through “church asylum” — a practice in Germany whereby prospective refugees can seek temporary protection through their local parish should they be considered to face persecution back in their home country. The measure allows time for a re-examination of their protection status by the state. A further 37 cases were disrupted by illness and individuals not being medically fit to be deported, 17 cases were thwarted by urgent applications to German courts, and 9 cases were adjourned due to ongoing criminal proceedings.Save 40% on our limited edition Brain Force Ultra that’s loaded with proprietary super ingredients! The governing center-right CDU in the German state accused the federal government comprising a left-liberal coalition of being responsible for the low success rate, denouncing recent bilateral agreements with third countries as “nothing more than a bad PR stunt.” “They have not brought about any noticeable improvements,” said Chris Schulenburg, the CDU’s domestic policy spokesman in Saxony. At the national level, leading CDU politicians have expressed their support for off-shore processing of asylum applications as a way to reduce the attractiveness of Germany as a migrant hotspot. The move would mirror similar policies adopted by the U.K. Conservative government and fellow EU member states Denmark and Italy. In December last year, the CDU’s former health minister, Jens Spahn, said, “If we did this and kept it up consequently for four, six, eight weeks, we would see the numbers reduce dramatically.” CDU leader Friedrich Merz and Thorsten Frei, the deputy chairman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag, have also commented in favor of radically reforming Germany’s asylum policy. Data from the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) published earlier this year revealed how asylum applications jumped by 51.1 percent to 350,000 last year compared to 2022 when 217,774 applications were made. Prof. Hans-Jürgen Papier, who served as president of the Federal Constitutional Court for eight years until 2010, claimed that the German asylum law was not fit for purpose and claimed the country was being abused by an influx of economic migrants with the luxury of handpicking which European nation they’d like to settle in. “Many people come to our country from all parts of the world for clearly non-asylum reasons. The right to asylum is therefore being misused and, in many cases, applied for improperly in Germany,” he noted. Meanwhile, figures published this week by the Federal Employment Agency revealed how welfare benefits were sky-rocketing across Germany, with more than two-thirds of beneficiaries being either first or second-generation migrants. BREAKING: Globalists Resigning In Mass Ahead Of HUGE Events – MUST WATCH

In 2023, YouTube removed 35,000 video uploads in EU. Google’s YouTube video platform is switching gearsin the lead-up to the 2024 election in order to rig the election against unapproved candidates. In a new blog post, YouTube laid out how it is “voluntarily” assuming the role of a private business that “supports elections.” YouTube is not just interested in rigging the United States election, though; the changes arrived just prior to the European Parliament (EP) election, which is also right around the corner. YouTube says its goal is to present “an overview of our efforts to help people across Europe and beyond find helpful and authoritative election news and information,” meaning YouTube will disseminate only approved information for public consumption to sway people’s voting habits. “The overview is the usual hodgepodge of reasonable concepts, such as promoting information on how to vote or register for voting, learning about election results, etc., that quickly morph into yet another battle in the ‘war on disinformation,'” warns Reclaim the Net about what YouTube is really up to.Power up with Nitric Boost that’s now 40% OFF! This potent formula gives you the massive edge in strength and superior circulation for that unparalleled performance you've been looking for! “And what better way to ‘support’ an election (and by extension, democracy) – than to engage in another round of mass censorship? /s.” (Related: Did you know that last summer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sued YouTube and Google over their “misinformation policies,” which he says violated his First Amendment right to free speech?) In 2023, YouTube removed 35,000 video uploads in EU In the same above-linked blog post, YouTube also admits, and quite proudly, that it pulled down 35,000 videos that were uploaded in the European Union (EU) in 2023, with many more also coming down this year. All of the videos purportedly contained information that violate the video platform’s policies, including “certain types of election misinformation” – are there certain kinds of election misinformation that YouTube allows, we wonder? It is not just artificial intelligence (AI) that is raking YouTube and pulling down “offensive” content, either. Reports indicate that YouTube has become a well-oiled machine “at scale” where “global teams of reviewers” search for videos to remove with the help of machine learning algorithms. YouTube’s excuse for behaving this way is that it simply wants to help it users “learn about the issues shaping the debate.” In order to do that, one component of the effort involves “dealing with harmful content,” which really means that YouTube is trying to shape the debate rather than simply facilitate it. “Our Intelligence Desk has also been working for months to get ahead of emerging issues and trends that could affect the EU elections, both on and off YouTube,” the blog post explains. “This helps our enforcement teams to address these potential trends before they become larger issues.” Furthermore, under no circumstances will YouTube allow any kind of coordinated influence campaigns to occur on the platform from now on, “regardless of the political viewpoints they support.” If Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG) believes it has spotted such a campaign, it will immediately share the information with law enforcement, including EUROPOL. While YouTube does admit that AI in general can potentially be used to destroy an election, its management insists that this type of AI is okay. “When viewers search for 2024 European parliamentary candidates, an information panel will appear above the search results, highlighting candidate information, such as their political party, and link to Google Search,” YouTube says. “Below the information panel, there may also be a link to the candidate’s official channel.” “In the final weeks of the campaign, on the YouTube homepage, we’ll show reminders on where and how to vote.” The latest news about election interference and Big Tech’s role in facilitating it can be found at Rigged.news. BREAKING: Globalists Resigning In Mass Ahead Of HUGE Events – MUST WATCH