from BANNED.VIDEO:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Black Chicago Resident EXPLODES at City Council Meeting over Migrant Crisis.🔥🔥🔥 “What's happening is they're emptying out the dregs of their jails into the United States‚ into our communities.” pic.twitter.com/CGhuJWjh6c — I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) February 22‚ 2024

The banking giant is arm-wrestling itself in a curious bid to grab a bigger slice of the world’s wealth. This time it’s the Rothschild family’s Swiss and French branches that are facing-off. It seems the obvious move is a merger. Though you never can tell when it comes to these banksters. And seeing as how the Rothschild’s have so much of the world’s banking system by the throat already‚ one has to wonder what how much longer the people will tolerate this? Two Rothschild bank clans are leveraging the family name to win a bigger piece of the global wealth-management pie. Odds are rising that their best way forward may be a merger https://t.co/vhUJKBa70K — Bloomberg (@business) February 20‚ 2024 RT reports: The Swiss and French branches are leveraging the family name in a bid to control the global wealth-management market. The Rothschild family’s Swiss and French branches are battling for dominance in the wealth management industry‚ which is causing tension and sparking speculation of a merger that would significantly impact the global financial landscape‚ Bloomberg wrote this week. The Swiss private bank‚ Edmond de Rothschild Group‚ and the smaller French lender‚ Rothschild &; Co.‚ are the only remaining banks with links to the family whose name has been a synonym for wealth and power for more than two centuries. The Rothschild family emerged from the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt in the 19th century to become one of the world’s richest and most powerful financial dynasties that bankrolled wars and empires‚ and helped shape Europe’s economic and political history. After decades of operating in relatively different segments‚ the Swiss and French branches are now targeting the same wealthy clients. The odds of a merger within the renowned family are now rising as both banks are fighting for a bigger share of the $250 trillion global wealth management industry‚ the outlet said. They are now targeting similar clients‚” said Christoph Kunzle‚ a lecturer on wealth management at Zurich University of Applied Sciences. “It’s very competitive and their centuries-old name is a big asset that they are both trying to leverage.” The Paris-based Rothschild &; Co. run by Alexandre de Rothschild‚ the 43-year-old seventh-generation scion is the smaller of the two banks. The bank had over €102 billion ($110 billion) in assets under management in mid-2023. However‚ it has been growing rapidly by opening more offices in the same segment‚ rivaling its Swiss peer. An aggressive expansion comes as the Swiss-based Edmond de Rothschild led by Baroness Ariane de Rothschild grapples with a stagnating business‚ the article stated. At the end of 2022‚ assets under management in the bank were down to 158 billion Swiss francs ($179 billion) from 178 billion the previous year. Meanwhile‚ over the past few years‚ the Paris-based firm has opened wealth-management offices in Italy‚ Luxemburg‚ UK and even made some acquisitions in Switzerland‚ Ariane’s backyard. Experts also point to confusion among customers as two separate Rothschild businesses are moving into each other’s territories. “Among consumers there is definitely confusion between the two‚” said Declan Ahern‚ a strategy and valuations director at Brand Finance. Experts say a merger would give heft to the Rothschild empire in a globalized economy‚ where the lines between tradition and innovation are increasingly blurred. Their bickering is quite pointless. The entire banking system that they built isn’t going to last much longer. And for those interested in learning more about the banking system that has entangled us all‚ here’s a classic book‚ The Creature from Jekyll Island. It gives you the behind the scenes info at how we got into this mess by explaining how the Federal Reserve was born. You might have seen this following clip‚ he’s the author of that book: RELATED: Why Does Rothschild Have a Patent For COVID Testing…From 2015? Since I wrote about the infamous Rothschild (RedShields) family earlier today‚ I couldn’t help but remember this old story about the family. Have you seen this? File this directly under “things that make you go hmmmm….” COVID caught us all by surprise in 2020‚ right? Well‚ all of us except the Rothschilds‚ I guess. At least according to the U.S. Patent Office. Because a Richard Rothschild was granted a patent for “System and Method for Testing for COVID-19” with a priority date (i.e. date it was first filed) of 2015. Yup‚ you read all of that right. Take a look: Patent application by a Rothschild for covid. Posted by Dr Malone pic.twitter.com/7NSAP07yUV — Dave (@Davej30367012) June 12‚ 2022 2015 c test Rothschild patent pic.twitter.com/Mfs00kicJD — Lorelei Lee (@EmmaImma7791) March 15‚ 2022 A Rothschild owned patent for testing Covid-19 from back in 2015! pic.twitter.com/KbUhT14UoC — ConspiracyWATCHâ–² (@ConspiracyWATCH) October 5‚ 2021 We don’t rely solely on Twitter/X for research around here. We go right to the source. And the source says? It looks true to me! From https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-2020279585-A1: Read it with your own eyes folks! System and Method for Testing for COVID-19.  Check! Richard Rothschild.  Check! Priority date: 2015.  Check! So….what gives? Well‚ as always we will give you BOTH sides of the story. That looks pretty damning to me‚ but there has to be an explanation‚ right? Sure enough‚ there is. Or at least they’re trying to sell you one… So I’ll report on it. They realize how bad this looks‚ so they’ve tried to rationalize it. Quote: NOTE: The priority date for patent application US-2020279585-A1 (and the corresponding grant US-11024339-B2) that Google has supplied is based on a series of separate-but-related patent applications dating back to 2015. Of those various applications‚ only US-2020279585-A1 mentions COVID-19‚ and it was filed on May 17‚ 2020. Please see the knowledgebase article on the topic: You buying that? They also brought in the big guns over at Reuters Fact Check to educate us all on why this isn’t really as bad as it looks — and why it’s a totally “false claim” to even suggest it: The false claim that a testing method for COVID-19 was patented by Richard Rothschild in 2015 and 2017 has been shared online. The patent for a system that analyses biometric data to determine whether the user is suffering from COVID-19 was not applied for until May 17‚ 2020. Reuters Fact Check. REUTERS The allegation is the subject of an article‚ which can be seen (here) . The website points to a Dutch website that shows a patent for a “System and Method for Testing for COVID-19″ (here) . The patent is numbered ‘US20200279585A1’ and has a “Prioriteitsdatum” (Dutch for “priority date”) of “2015-10-13”. The article claims that the 2015 priority date is evidence that the coronavirus pandemic has been planned. But the author has conflated the terms “priority date” and “application date”. The priority date can refer to the earliest filing date in a family of related patent applications‚ or to the earliest filing date of a particular feature of an invention (here) . In this case‚ Oct. 13‚ 2015 is when Rothschild first made a provisional application within this family of patents. A series of regular‚ non-provisional patent applications were subsequently made for a “System and Method For Using‚ Processing‚ and Displaying Biometric Data” (here) . These earlier patents are essentially the predecessors to ‘US20200279585A1’ – and as such share similar features‚ such as the use of biometric data (here) . However‚ the patent for a system that analyses biometric data to determine whether the user is suffering from COVID-19 was not applied for until May 17‚ 2020 (here). The article also claims to provide evidence of a patent for COVID-19 testing being filed for in 2017. It references the patent for a “System and Method for Using‚ Biometric‚ and Displaying Biometric Data” and its filing date of April 24‚ 2017 (here) . As already discussed‚ although this patent is indeed a predecessor to ‘US20200279585A1’‚ it does not mention COVID-19 in any form. VERDICT False. The year 2015 was when Rothschild first filed a provisional application within the family of patents. The year 2017 is the filing date of a related‚ but separate patent within the family. This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here . So there you go! We report‚ you decide. What do you think? Just a big coincidence probably‚ I’m sure…

Just what you have all been begging me for‚ an article on Taylor Swift. Usually I ignore Taylor Tales. ( I just came up with that. Not bad‚ eh?) But this one was REALLY shocking‚ and I’ve seen a lot. If you’ve got any Taylor fans in your life‚ you might want to share this with them. Imagine being disappointed by someone giving God glory. Saturday was the SAG Awards. And none us care about these people patting themselves on the back. But during the event a camera captures Taylor’s reaction the moment someone on stage lists off the names they want to thank for their award. “And of course‚ God. Without God none of this would be possible.” You would’ve thought Taylor’s agent just fired her and said there’s a nationwide boycott on her albums and she now has to get a job at McDonalds. Though‚ this viral story might prompt a boycott. “America’s sweetheart” literally shakes her head in disgust. Watch the clip: Fresh off the presses…Watch her closely when “God” is mentioned… pic.twitter.com/79gekzWmR5 — D-Bark (@DBark012) February 23‚ 2024 Premier Christian reports their take on her ‘faith’: In December 2023‚ a clip of preacher Dr Tony Wood went somewhat viral. The pastor of Mission Bible Church in Costa Mesa‚ California regularly posts clips from his sermons on Instagram‚ but the reason for the wider-than-normal distribution of this particular message was that it made a target of a beloved cultural icon. The world outside the pastor’s window had become obsessed with singer-songwriter Taylor Swift‚ and he was not impressed. “When the hope of the world is someone in pink spandex and known for glitter bombs‚ you know that the world is in a woeful and grievous place‚” he declared. Wood was apparently incensed that TIME magazine‚ America’s traditional arbiter of global influence‚ had named Swift as its 2023 ‘Person of the Year’. Taking particular exception to a line in the magazine which described her as a ‘light’ in a dark time‚ he went to great lengths to explain that‚ in fact‚ a “middle-aged pop star” (Swift is 34) was no one’s idea of hope in a suffering world. That she couldn’t help you with your everyday problems‚ let alone your eternal ones. “Taylor Swift can never lay her body over that chasm‚ allowing us to walk over it to get into the graces of a mighty God‚” he rallied. “There is only one who ever could‚ and his name is Jesus.” In the background of all the break-up songs and glitter bombs‚ the vapours of Christian faith remain And so while we enjoy her music‚ and find her intriguing‚ there’s another part to the equation; the context within which Swift inevitably resides. It’s the dark world to which Jacobs referred in his editorial; the uncertain cultural moment that desperately demands some heroic light. Perhaps TIME is right: Swift’s popularity is found in her ability to illuminate our world in its gloomiest moments. Raised in a Christian home and formatively shaped in the Bible Belt hotspot of Nashville‚ Tennessee‚ Swift has publicly declared herself to be a Christian. In a famous clip in which she railed against the rise of Trumpian politics (and specifically the Republican senator Marsha Blackburn)‚ she expressed her anger at policies such as one which legislated against domestic violence victims. She was furious that Blackburn had suggested that such policies were in keeping with “Tennesee Christian values”‚ saying: “I live in Tennessee. I’m a Christian. That’s not what we stand for.” This outburst seemed to be a little slip of the mask for a figure who has generally adopted the ‘we don’t do God’ approach to entertainment-world-domination. Without interrogating the nature of her faith‚ we can take her word that she at least has one. Her lyrics offer few clues to what that faith looks like‚ and she makes only fleeting and occasional references to it. In the song ‘Soon you’ll get better’‚ Swift talks about turning to prayer – specifically to Jesus – when her mother was diagnosed with cancer: “Holy orange bottles‚ each night I pray to you / Desperate people find faith‚ so now I pray to Jesus too.” Like many Christians‚ her theology seems to embrace the power of God to work alongside and through medicine‚ but she still makes space for the work of the miraculous. But I ask you‚ what kind of Christian would be upset by that someone gave thanks to God? Is she a Christian? Maybe she’s just made at God at the moment. You be the judge. Poor‚ Taylor. Someone put on a sad Radiohead song to comfort here.

NFL MVP Cam Newton appeared to be involved in a physical confrontation over the weekend and a 7-on-7 youth football camp. Some reports said that it appeared as though Newton was jumped by several men‚ although exact details about what happened at the event in Atlanta on Sunday are still not clear. Newton — who is 6’5”‚ 250 pounds — can be seen in the video manhandling most of the men during the altercation. USA Today said that Newton may have been “looking to break up a fight involving two or possibly three people before camp staffers and security officers stepped in to restore order.” The fight started off near a pop up tent and ended several yards away. Security officials stepped in to help break up the fight. It did not appear as though anyone was seriously hurt. WATCH: Cam Newton fighting the TSP dudes ??? 👀👀👀 pic.twitter.com/peEdkhh0dR — Van (@vanman_1000) February 25‚ 2024 Better camera angle of the beginning of the fight when TSP crew tried to jump Cam Newton by blindsiding him with a punch. pic.twitter.com/TBZWc2q4nL — The Art Of Dialogue (@ArtOfDialogue_) February 25‚ 2024 This is a developing news story; refresh the page for updates. 

Numerous House Democrats have signaled that they would not certify a 2024 presidential election win from Donald Trump‚ relying on the 14th Amendment to claim Trump is an insurrectionist and thus ineligible from holding office. Democrats including Reps. James Clyburn (SC)‚ Jamie Raskin (MD)‚ Adam Schiff (CA)‚ Eric Swalwell (CA)‚ and even House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies refused to say that they would confirm Trump to office if he won the 2024 election. As Dan McLaughlin explained at National Review‚ Democrats could have the votes to sustain an objection to a Trump win if they take control of the House. “Only a simple majority is required‚ and unlike when the House chooses a president under the Twelfth Amendment‚ they don’t vote by states‚” he wrote. “Unlike in 2016 or 2004‚ when they were in the minority‚ House Democrats could be playing with live ammunition.” Still‚ a majority of senators would have to object to a Trump win‚ too. This would likely take 51 senators‚ and as McLaughlin pointed out‚ this would be a tough task for Democrats: They “either have to hold every seat they currently occupy (good luck in West Virginia)‚ or take a Republican-held seat (the bluest of which is either Ted Cruz’s in Texas or Rick Scott’s in Florida)‚” he said. A potential way around some of this chaos rests at the Supreme Court‚ which heard oral arguments earlier this month in Trump v. Anderson‚ a case about whether or not a state‚ in this case Colorado‚ can keep Trump off the ballot based on the 14th Amendment. If the high court gives clarity on the issue of Trump eligibility‚ specifically that he is eligible‚ then Democrats would not have room to object on this basis. The arguments‚ so far‚ have bode well for Trump. Nearly every single justice‚ including the liberal ones‚ seemed exceedingly uncomfortable with siding with Colorado based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Notably‚ that provision was enacted immediately following the Civil War in an effort to keep anyone who engaged in an “insurrection” from holding office. Attorney Jonathan Mitchell‚ who argued on behalf of Trump‚ argued that Section 3 doesn’t mention “president‚” but an “officer of the United States‚” which he says includes appointed officials‚ not elected officials. Another argument centered around Colorado adding a qualification to Trump by deeming him an insurrectionist and then disqualifying him before the election. Some of the strongest pushback to Colorado’s claims came from Justice Elena Kagan. “Why should a single state have the ability to make this determination not only for their own citizens but also for the nation?” she pressed the Colorado legal team. “It sounds awfully national to me … if you weren’t from Colorado‚ and you were from Wisconsin‚ or you were from Michigan‚ and what the Michigan secretary of state did is going to make the difference between whether candidate A is elected over Candidate  B is elected? I mean that seems quite extraordinary.” BREAKING: Best Supreme Court Quote Just Now By Justice Kagan: "The question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be President of the United States." pic.twitter.com/ftN4tNV7sG — Simon Ateba (@simonateba) February 8‚ 2024

Hundreds of thousands of Brazilians rallied on Sunday in the country’s biggest city to show support for former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro‚ who flew an Israeli flag in a rebuttal of anti-Semitic remarks made by the country’s current president‚ corrupt socialist Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The rally comes as Brazil’s federal government investigates Bolsonaro over whether he was involved in orchestrating riots on government buildings last January‚ the Associated Press reported‚ adding that he’s also under investigation for allegedly receiving illegal gifts from Saudi Arabia during his presidency. Bolsonaro‚ who is barred from running for office until 2030‚ wants those who have been locked up from the riot to be pardoned and released from jail. “What I seek is pacification‚ it is erasing the past‚” he said. “It is to seek a way for us to live in peace and stop being so jumpy. Amnesty for those poor people who are jailed in Brasilia. We ask all 513 congressmen‚ 81 senators for a bill of amnesty so justice can be made in Brazil.” He also shot down allegations that there was ever a coup attempted in the country: “What is a coup? It is tanks on the streets‚ weapons‚ conspiracy. None of that happened in Brazil.” Roughly 750‚000 people attended the rally‚ according to estimates from the Public Security Secretariat. WATCH: âž¡ Ato bolsonarista reuniu 750 mil na Avenida Paulista‚ diz SSP Estimativa da Secretaria da Segurança Pública contabiliza ruas adjacentes; reportagem observou 10 quarteirões com público na Paulista Leia: https://t.co/pzkWKnRNrD pic.twitter.com/XOt4Uzfse5 — Metrópoles (@Metropoles) February 25‚ 2024 Bolsonaro also waved an Israeli flag at the rally in a clear rebuttal of Lula‚ who was condemned last week for engaging in anti-Semitic Holocaust denial. Lula’s remarks come as Israel continues to conduct military operations inside Gaza to recover hostages who were kidnapped during the unprecedented October 7 terrorist attack and to eliminate Hamas terrorists and infrastructure. During the early morning surprise attack‚ Hamas murdered 1‚200 people in Israel‚ injured 5‚300+‚ and kidnapped hundreds. 🚨A DEMOCRACIA TEM LADO: Ex-presidente Bolsonaro exibe bandeira de Israel em gesto de solidariedade na Av. Paulista Solidariedade à nação israelense. pic.twitter.com/JbrWppAntQ — Meio Independente (@meioindep) February 25‚ 2024 “What’s happening in the Gaza Strip isn’t a war‚ it’s a genocide‚” Lula told reporters at an African Union summit in Ethiopia. “It’s not a war of soldiers against soldiers. It’s a war between a highly prepared army and women and children.” “What’s happening in the Gaza Strip with the Palestinian people hasn’t happened at any other moment in history‚” he said. “Actually‚ it has happened: when Hitler decided to kill the Jews.” Israel has taken unprecedented measures to minimize the loss of civilian life during the war‚ including dropping hundreds of thousands of leaflets urging Gazans to leave specific areas‚ calling Gazans and urging them to evacuate‚ opening up safe corridors so they can travel without being fired upon by Hamas‚ and calling off airstrikes after civilians were located near a designated target. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to Lula’s remarks with a statement posted to social media‚ saying that Israel would take diplomatic action over the incident. “The words of the president of Brazil are shameful and serious. This is about trivializing the Holocaust and trying to harm the Jewish people and Israel’s right to defend itself‚” Netanyahu said. “Comparing Israel to the Nazi Holocaust and Hitler is crossing a red line. Israel fights for its defense and securing its future until complete victory and it does so while upholding international law.” “I decided with Foreign Minister Israel Katz to summon the Brazilian ambassador to Israel for a stern reprimand conversation immediately‚” he added.