YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #jesuschrist #christmas #christ #merrychristmas #princeofpeace #achildisborn #noël #christmas2025
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Bikers Den
Bikers Den
1 w ·Youtube General Interest

YouTube
Harley CEO Shakes up the ENTIRE Motor Company
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 w

Vocalist reimagines Mariah Carey's 'All I Want for Christmas' with 6 different, iconic voices
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Vocalist reimagines Mariah Carey's 'All I Want for Christmas' with 6 different, iconic voices

Every singer has small signatures, even if they aren’t consciously aiming for them: patterns in diction and phrasing, subtle rhythmic and melodic choices. These quirks make certain vocalists extremely difficult to impersonate. They also makes Justin J. Moore a master of the musical homage. He’s built up an impressive following on social media, frequently tackling well-known songs in the style of multiple vocalists, including a head-spinning cover of Mariah Carey’s holiday staple "All I Want for Christmas Is You." In this rapid-fire performance, he channels six pop/rock singers with immediately recognizable voices: Maroon 5’s Adam Levine, Charlie Puth, Ed Sheeran, Panic! at the Disco’s Brendon Urie, Green Day’s Billie Joe Armstrong, and James Blunt. See on Instagram It’s even more impressive how he’s accomplishing this: switching jarringly between the voices in a 40-second span, belting the song’s first verse at full bore. All those little hallmarks are there: Puth’s smooth falsetto, Armstrong’s snarl, Urie’s boisterous emo stylings. He even ends with a brief but beautiful stretch of his own unaffected singing. Someone should study his voice in a lab. People in the comments are still processing what they saw. "I still get temporarily stunned by James Blunt""This is absolute gold. You are the sole reason IG is still a place worth spending time. Tha talent. Oh the talent. But love the you’ve started including your own voice in the mashups too ❤️❤️?""How is everyone skipping past that Brendon Urie? Perfect 10/10. Top marks, no notes.""Brotha just became his whole Spotify wrapped""The awkward moment when you're the best singer than all the famous singers you're imitating. ???""Seriously amazing as always. Your James Blunt is amazing, but that Charlie Puth blows me away.""I’ve watched so many of these, and I still get temporarily stunned by James Blunt every time." See on Instagram "All I Want for Christmas Is You": now even more immortalMoore, who has channeled many of these same artists in his other videos, even joked about the latter artist in the video’s Instagram caption. "I can feel myself slowly becoming James Blunt," he wrote. "It’s becoming harder to recognize myself every day. I fear soon that there will be nothing left of me. The only way forward is to embrace it." For another example, check out the video where he tackles Fountains of Wayne’s power-pop anthem "Stacy’s Mom" in the vein of Blunt, Armstrong, Sheeran, Urie, Levine, Fall Out Boy’s Patrick Stump, Passenger, Owl City’s Adam Young, Elvis Presley, Simple Plan’s Pierre Bouvier, and Michael Bublé. That’s a lot of vocal switching. It was the perfect time to cover Carey’s "All I Want for Christmas Is You," and not only because of the holidays. The track, first released on her 1994 LP, Merry Christmas, once again reached No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100—now claiming the top spot for 20 total weeks, making it the longest-reigning song in the chart’s history. Equally impressive, Carey has two other songs with nearly the same stats: Her 1995 collaboration with Boyz II Men, "One Sweet Day," topped the chart for 16 weeks, and her 2005 hit "We Belong Together" lasted for 14. - YouTube www.youtube.com
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 w

Teacher explains why she 'refuses' to give students zeroes, or any grade below 50 percent
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Teacher explains why she 'refuses' to give students zeroes, or any grade below 50 percent

Teachers, parents, and educators of all kinds want the same thing: the best for our kids. But figuring out what the "best" really means when it comes to curriculum, grading, and teaching methods isn't as simple as it seems.One teacher recently went viral for explaining her hotly-debated policy: She "refuses" to give her students a grade below 50%.Jen Manly says she's taught middle school, high school, and college students, and in a TikTok video, she announced that she "refuses to give less than a 50%. Assuming they've turned something in, of course."When she breaks down her reasoning, it makes total sense:"On a 0-100 grading scale, there is a 10-point window for A's, B's, C's, and D's," she says. "However, there's 60 points that are equivalent to an F."That means, she explains, that if a student does extremely poorly on a couple of assignments (say, earning an 18% or a 30%), "it's going to take multiple A or B grades to help them recover from that low grade." That can make their grade artificially low, she says, because of one or two bad performances. In other words, their grade won't truly reflect their mastery of the content and their ability to meet the learning standards."What we're doing when we set the minimum grade at 50% is we're making sure that all grades have about the same impact on their overall grade."Some teachers and policies go so far as to give 50% as the minimum even if a kid doesn't turn in an assignment at all. It's an idea that's hard to stomach for people with a more old-fashioned mindset, but the reasoning remains the same. If a student with C-level mastery of the material misses an assignment, he or she will be fighting all semester long to claw their way back up to a barely passable grade.You can see why that would be demoralizing to a kid who's already having trouble in school, and you run the risk of that student checking out completely and giving up on the course altogether. @strategicclassroom #stitch with @erikaschafrickk as always, this is not me telling anyone this is the only right way to grade, simply sharing how my class operates and how I came to that pedagogical choice. #teachertok #grading #ungrading #standardsbasedgrading This is a concept called "equitable grading," and it's growing in popularity in many school districts across the United States and beyond.Equitable grading aims to level the playing field by eliminating circumstances that might hold a student back, like a challenging home life or learning and behavioral difficulties. It's the same kind of idea that led a lot of schools to ditch "Perfect Attendance" awards."Policies like 'no zeros,' eliminating late penalties, and allowing unlimited retakes aim to make grading fairer for disadvantaged students," writes the Fordham Institute.One teacher on TikTok named Lauren explains how, with equitable grading practices, a student could get all the answers wrong on a math test and still receive a passing grade. If they show that they understand the steps and methods, but make a few mistakes or computational errors, their grade will only get a minor ding. That's just one example of these more modern grading practices in action. @audhd_formerteacher Replying to @Ju Ventura here are some examples of how i gave partial credit and helped my students use making mistakes as an essencial lart of the learning process by giving them the chance to correct it rather than punishing them for not being perfect on the first try. #equitablegrading #edutok #mathteacher #equityineducation #ableism #teacher #teachersoftiktok #matheducation This approach has strong critics and opponents that argue grades should also reflect effort and quality of work, not just mastery of the material.In fact, the Fordham Institute finds in a survey that most teachers don't like these policies overall. They feel pressured to give higher grades and believe it ultimately harms student learningIn 2019, a Florida teacher was fired after violating her school's "No Zeroes" policy, to great public outrage. Giving a minimum of 50% even if a student doesn't turn an assignment in is one of the more divisive components of equitable grading that's sometimes practiced around the country.Justin Baeder, PhD, says on TikTok, "I don't think grades should reflect mastery. Grades are reflecting a combination of learning and effort and work quality. If a student comes in knowing everything they need to know in a course, you don't automatically give them an A without doing any of the assignments."Similarly, he argues, you shouldn't give failing grades to kids who don't meet the learning standards provided they've put in full effort. @eduleadership Should grades reflect only mastery? Or do effort and work quality matter? #education #teachersoftiktok #edleadership #principalsoftiktok #grading Teacher Mr. Trayon argues that giving students too much grace for poor effort, poor performance, or missed assignments does them a disservice. It doesn't prepare them for college or the "real world" where they won't be given so much leeway.Traditional grading systems are problematic in many ways, and equitable grading also has its drawbacks. However, there are other solutions.Jen Manly says many schools have moved to a 1-4 grading scale instead of adopting 50% as the minimum grade. So giving a student a 1 as the worst possible evaluation of their work won't drag their grade down nearly as far as a 20% on the traditional 0-100.Baeder, for his part, has argued for a 20-point grading scale for similar reasons. He believes that there should be other interventions for students who are missing assignments, like detentions or losing participation privileges. Many teachers allow students to turn in late work for partial credit to avoid the zero, for example.In Australian schools, missed, late, or incomplete work is often scored with something called a "notional zero," which is a grade that essentially lies just below the lowest score achieved by any other student in the class for that assignment. It's a unique and novel approach.In the end, it comes down to what we want grades to measure and what we want our kids to get out of school. Do we want them to come out of a math class having really mastered the material? Or do we want them to have learned the importance of hard work and effort? Most of us would agree that a bit of both would be ideal, but it's harder than it seems to measure that goal in a fair and equitable way.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 w

Does self-control equal happiness and success? A new study flips the idea on its head.
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Does self-control equal happiness and success? A new study flips the idea on its head.

In Western culture, there has always been the assumption that self-control lies at the root of having a successful and happy life. After all, early to bed and early to rise makes one happy, wealthy, and wise, right? We assume that the child who chooses to wait 10 minutes to eat two marshmallows rather than eat only one right away has the impulse control to succeed in life. However, a new study from Singapore shows that we may have things backward.Is self-control the key to happiness?Researchers at the National University of Singapore noted that there was little solid research demonstrating that self-control was the key to happiness and success, so they set out to test that assumption. They found that the causal relationship between self-control and happiness or success was "surprisingly weak and fraught with issues." A woman having a goofball moment.via Canva/PhotosThe researchers conducted two experiments, one involving participants in China and the other in the United States. Both came back with the same results: Participants who ranked high in self-control didn't appear to be any happier six months later. However, participants who reported high levels of "well-being" at the initial assessment showed greater self-control at the subsequent measurement.To put things simply, self-control doesn't create personal well-being. People who cultivated well-being later showed improved self-control at the follow-up assessment. The key takeaway is this: If you want to achieve a goal, focus on your mental and emotional well-being first. Once that is aligned, you create the internal environment needed to take on difficult tasks. Feeling well leads to functioning well.Feeling well precedes functioning well"Instead of viewing happiness as a reward you get after achieving your goals through discipline, think of well-being as the fuel that powers the engine of self-control," Lile Jia, an associate professor at the National University of Singapore and director of the Situated Goal Pursuit (SPUR) Lab, told PsyPost. "If you want to get better at resisting temptations, starting new projects, or sticking with good habits, a great first step is to invest in activities that make you feel happy, energetic, optimistic, and appreciative of life. Our research indicates that feeling well precedes functioning well."Jia conducted a 2018 study on college students and sports that reached a similar conclusion. The question was this: Do high-achieving students take time off from their studies to watch their football or basketball teams, or is that break taken only by students with lower GPAs? The study found that high-achieving students did take time off to watch their teams, but they planned ahead by adding extra study hours in the week before games. Conversely, low-GPA students skipped the game altogether.Taking a break from work isn’t a problem - as long as it’s a PLANNED break. Among students indulging in study breaks, motivation and mood remained high among students who had PLANNED to take a break - but not ones who spontaneously decided to. Lile Jia #SPSP2023 @The_SSM pic.twitter.com/12gL3oYMKm— Erin Westgate (@ErinWestgate) February 23, 2023 The lesson of the study: More successful people still enjoy indulgences; they simply plan them in advance so they can enjoy them more than if they were last-minute decisions.The good news from Jia's work is that the road to success doesn't have to be a struggle, because the happier and healthier we are, the more successful we'll be."Instead, it can be paved with positive experiences," Jia said. "By actively cultivating joy, engagement, and meaning in our lives, we are not just making ourselves feel better in the moment; we are also building the psychological resources we need to be more effective and successful in the future. It places the pursuit of well-being at the very center of personal growth."
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 w

The singer Axl Rose called his biggest musical teacher: “It would open my mind”
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

The singer Axl Rose called his biggest musical teacher: “It would open my mind”

The perfect example of a classic frontman. The post The singer Axl Rose called his biggest musical teacher: “It would open my mind” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 w

When billions are at stake, is there a point at which the bullion banks reach some pain threshold where they simply can’t keep playing?
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

When billions are at stake, is there a point at which the bullion banks reach some pain threshold where they simply can’t keep playing?

When billions are at stake, is there a point at which the bullion banks reach some pain threshold where they simply can't keep playing? Full report: https://t.co/PxOxNsI2Ko pic.twitter.com/BYu53F0iRa — Peak Financial Investing (@PeakFinInv) December 15, 2025
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 w

Trump Orders A “Complete Blockade Of Sanctioned Oil Tankers” Coming In and Out Of Venezuela
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Trump Orders A “Complete Blockade Of Sanctioned Oil Tankers” Coming In and Out Of Venezuela

by Mac Slavo, SHTF Plan: United States President Donald Trump has ordered “a total and complete” blockade of all sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela. This move has been condemned by Caracas as “warmongering threats.” The Trump administration is desperately trying to tie the drug trafficking to the current Venezuelan regime, as it looks […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 w

Erika Kirk has no history or social media footprint before adulthood! NONE!
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Erika Kirk has no history or social media footprint before adulthood! NONE!

from SettingBrushfires: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 w

How US Women Won the Right to Vote With the Nineteenth Amendment
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

How US Women Won the Right to Vote With the Nineteenth Amendment

  When the US officially became an independent country, voting was restricted to property-owning white men. It wasn’t long before other groups began demanding an equal voice in the fledgling democracy. Beginning a decade before the Civil War, the women’s suffrage movement would battle for more than 70 years to secure voting rights for women—as well as grappling with internal issues that at times threatened to derail the movement entirely.   19th Century: The Early Push for Suffrage Report of the Woman’s Rights Convention, held at Seneca Falls, New York, July 19 and 20, 1848. Proceedings and Declaration of Sentiments. Source: Library of Congress   Though there were undoubtedly women calling for voting rights from the outset, the beginning of the formal suffrage movement is generally regarded as the Seneca Falls Convention. Held on July 19, 1848 and often referred to as the first women’s rights convention, the event was organized by a number of women also active in the abolitionist movement.   The key document resulting from the Convention was the Declaration of Sentiments, modeled after the Declaration of Independence and intended to secure for women the same rights and freedoms men had won when the former colonies became a sovereign nation. The signatories adopted a set of 12 resolutions calling for women’s equality with men, including the right to vote. A second national convention was organized the following year, bringing together more than 1,000 participants, including famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass. Yearly meetings continued through 1860.   Disrupted by the Civil War, the suffrage movement picked up in earnest in 1865 with the formation of the American Equal Rights Association, which sought universal suffrage—voting rights for men and women of all races. Efforts continued to push for women’s suffrage, including suffrage bills petitioned from state governments, lawsuits challenging male-only voting laws, picketing, and hunger strikes. In response, a formal amendment granting women suffrage was introduced to Congress in 1878—where it would languish for four decades.   The Women’s Suffrage Movement: Key Players Seven prominent figures of the suffrage and women’s rights movement, L. Schamer, L. Prang & Co., c. 1870. Source: Library of Congress   Lucretia Mott, a Quaker and prominent abolitionist, has long been considered the founder of the women’s suffrage movement, but she worked alongside numerous other women who would become central players in the decades-long battle for voting rights. Other early key figures included Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who helped organize the Seneca Falls Convention. She was well-educated and outspoken but ultimately considered too radical and became controversial for her apparent racism, even while fighting for abolition.   Stanton formed a bond with fellow suffragette Susan B. Anthony, who provided powerful support for the movement by organizing conventions, petitions, lectures, and other public events. She collaborated with Stanton and Matilda Joslyn Gage to write The History of Woman Suffrage. She was perhaps the best-known figure of the movement, with the Amendment that ultimately passed named for her.   As the movement aged, new players came on the scene, including Lucy Stone, Carrie Chapman Catt, and Alice Paul, who each brought new perspectives and approaches to the movement. Stone founded the Women’s Journal, a prominent voice for the suffrage movement, while Catt worked to establish international ties and helped found the International Woman Suffrage Alliance. Paul took a prominent leadership role in the movement in the 20th century, adopting more radical public actions aimed directly at Washington and with fellow activist Lucy Burns is often credited with engineering the final push that secured women’s suffrage. Unfortunately, she also, on numerous occasions, segregated or excluded prominent Black activists in order to pander to Southern white women.   1864 portrait of Sojourner Truth. Source: Library of Congress   Paul’s actions embody one of the suffrage movement’s most persistent failings: recognizing Black women’s contributions. The early suffrage movement took many of its organizing and demonstration tactics from the abolition movement, and Black women—notably excluded from The History of Woman Suffrage—worked tirelessly for the cause from its earliest days.   Initially, Black women participated in the same organizations as their white counterparts, working side-by-side on both suffrage and abolition in the 1850s and 60s, taking on leadership roles and organizing events. Prominent activists during this period included Sojourner Truth, who delivered her famous “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech at the 1851 women’s rights convention, saying, “The poor men seem to be all in confusion, and dont know what to do. Why children, if you have woman’s rights, give it to her and you will feel better. You will have your own rights, and they wont be so much trouble.”   As the movement progressed, Black women often formed their own organizations, both local and national, to fight for suffrage—often because white suffragettes were minimizing their roles or discriminating against them in a bid to court Southern whites for the cause. Central figures of the later movement included Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Mary E. Church Terrell, and Ida B. Wells, who, together with other Black suffragettes, formed the National Association of Colored Women to better address the unique needs of Black women—who faced the dual challenges of racism and sexism. While Black and white women continued to fight together for suffrage in many arenas into the 20th century, racism continued to plague the movement, festering since its earliest days.   Controversy: Votes for White Women vs. Black Men Portrait of abolitionist Frederick Douglass, 1855. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York   In the mid-19th century, movements seeking equal rights for Black citizens and those working toward women’s equality were often intertwined and mutually supportive, sharing a common goal. Sadly, this informal coalition fell apart during the Reconstruction period with the introduction of the 15th Amendment, granting Black men the right to vote—at least in theory, if not in practice.   Some activists, including Stanton and Anthony, felt it was unfair for Black men to be granted the right to vote before white women. Racism and sexism both seemed to rear their heads in the debate over the proposed Amendment. At one meeting, Frederick Douglass, criticizing Stanton’s earlier claims that Black people were ignorant of the laws and political system, insisted that it was more urgent for Black men to have the vote because their very lives were at stake—a true claim, but one Douglass seemingly failed to recognize could also be made by women, then viewed as the property of their fathers and husbands. Anthony responded, “If intelligence, justice, and morality are to have precedence in the government, let the question of women be brought up first and that of the negro last.”   With a number of suffragettes insisting on an “all or nothing” approach to voting rights, a schism developed in the suffrage movement. In 1869, Stanton and Anthony formed a new activist group, the National Woman Suffrage Association, which opposed a 15th Amendment that did not include women and advocated for a number of measures to ensure women’s equality, including a Constitutional amendment granting them the right to vote.   A separate organization that supported the 15th Amendment, the American Woman Suffrage Association, formed that same year, focused exclusively on suffrage and began to pursue a state-by-state strategy to increase women’s access to the vote without the need for an amendment. With its focused goals and inclusive membership, AWSA became the more popular organization.   Five Decades of Fighting Anti-suffrage propaganda insinuating that if women could vote, men might have to take care of their own children. E.H. Webb, 1914. Source: Lombard History   The 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870, legally enfranchising all male US citizens aged 21 and over. Women’s fight continued—not only against the men in power but also against other women. Opposition anti-suffrage organizations were founded by and often included prominent women who argued that getting involved in political issues would distract women from their “natural” roles as mothers and wives.   While the Women’s Suffrage Amendment proposed in Congress in 1878 remained stalled—despite the Select Committee on Woman Suffrage supporting its passage—progress was slowly made in securing voting rights in individual states. Wyoming was the first territory to permit women to vote in 1869 and was joined over the next two decades by the Utah, Washington, and Montana territories—which some suggest was a ploy to encourage women to move into the sparsely populated lands being opened up by pioneers, rather than any meaningful recognition of women’s equality. Other states, while denying full suffrage, opted to allow women to vote in specific elections—for example, school boards—where their concerns were considered relevant.   Woman suffrage in Wyoming Territory; scene at the polls in Cheyenne, from a photo by Kirkland 1888. Source: Library of Congress   Lawsuits continued to be filed arguing that denying women the vote was unconstitutional, including the Minor v. Happersett case, which made it to the Supreme Court. The Court, however, while recognizing the plaintiff as a citizen, declared that voting was not one of the citizenship privileges guaranteed by the Constitution. Some activists simply started registering and trying to vote, forcing polls to turn them away. Susan B. Anthony famously cast a vote in the 1872 presidential election and was later arrested and tried, bringing widespread public attention to the suffrage cause.   By 1890, tensions between the two leading suffrage organizations had abated, and they merged once more, forming the National American Woman Suffrage Association, led by Elizabeth Cady Stanton. The group continued to push individual states to grant suffrage through the end of the century.   20th Century: Winning the Right to Vote Women’s suffrage parade in Washington, D.C., March 3, 1913. Source: National Archives   At the turn of the century, as women increasingly left the domestic sphere and entered the workforce, historians note an increased push for a Constitutional amendment to grant women’s suffrage nationwide. An increase in activism was seen at the seat of government in Washington DC. Members of the National American Woman Suffrage Association took advantage of their annual meeting to appear at the Capitol and lobby lawmakers. Parades and marches with thousands of participants were organized in DC, New York, and other major cities—marchers were often assaulted by bystanders with little police intervention.   With many failures over the previous two decades, an increasing number of states passed laws guaranteeing women’s suffrage. Still, without a nationwide right to vote established, women could only vote in 20 states by the end of the 1910s. While 1912 presidential candidate Teddy Roosevelt came out in support of women’s suffrage, he ultimately lost the election, and the winner, Woodrow Wilson, opposed the initiative.   The Congressional Union, once a committee of the NAWSA, broke with the organization and formed the National Woman’s Party. More activist and controversial, the NWP engaged in acts of civil disobedience to bring attention to the cause, including a two-year protest in front of the White House that resulted in many suffragettes being jailed, assaulted, and tortured. At the same time, World War I was bringing more women into the workforce, as well as relying on them for patriotic wartime services: serving as nurses, knitting for soldiers on the frontlines, managing their households through rationing, and sowing victory gardens.   A suffragette picketing the White House, 1917-1918. Source: National Archives   After more than half a century of activism, the tide began to turn. More Americans, perhaps in recognition of women’s essential contributions to the war effort, favored suffrage while also being repulsed by the treatment of the suffragettes imprisoned for their peaceful demonstrations. President Wilson did an about-face and came out in support of women’s suffrage in 1918, deeming it necessary as “a war measure.” The Amendment, first introduced in 1878, was finally approved by both chambers of Congress in 1919 and ratified by just a single vote in 1920.   The passage of the 19th Amendment was a resounding victory for the equal rights movement—but hardly the end of the battle. Some women remained disenfranchised because they were not recognized as citizens, while those who had won the right to vote, particularly Black women, continued to face discrimination and encountered various forms of voter intimidation and suppression. And the ability to vote did little to dismantle the many other forms of gender-based inequality, some of which remain to this day.   Following the passage of the Amendment, the NAWSA became the League of Women Voters, intended to help women undertake their new role as informed voters. In 1923, the LWV proposed the Equal Rights Amendment, demanding that “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.” To date, it has not been adopted.
Like
Comment
Share
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
1 w ·Youtube General Interest

YouTube
17 Spooky Riddles With Answers You Won’t Like
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 867 out of 104049
  • 863
  • 864
  • 865
  • 866
  • 867
  • 868
  • 869
  • 870
  • 871
  • 872
  • 873
  • 874
  • 875
  • 876
  • 877
  • 878
  • 879
  • 880
  • 881
  • 882
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund