Following the highly anticipated Pentagon press conference from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Air Force General Dan Caine, where the former called out the lies of the liberal media, on Thursday, CNN News Central hosts Kate Bolduan and Sara Sidner rushed to falsely claim that Hegseth had “confirmed” their reporting about the untrue battle damage assessment illegally leaked to CNN and other outlets. Both hosts insisted that the initial reporting on the false assessment by national security correspondent Natasha Bertrand admitted that it was “low confidence” and only “preliminary.” But a NewsBusters investigation found that not to be true at all. Immediately following the Q&A portion of the press conference, Bolduan sprinted to deride Hegseth as “emotional” and suggest that what he said wasn’t reported was indeed covered by CNN: But at the same time, we do need to make clear that despite the emotional speech and outrage from the Defense Secretary, what he said about the DIA assessment is what CNN reported on. His issue, that he took about it being preliminary, about it being low confidence. CNN reported on all of on all of this. While Bolduan was reading the most up-to-date version of the report (remember that for later) where it said the report was “low confidence” and “preliminary,” Sidner chimed in to proclaim: “It’s in there … It is literally what he said we did not report.”   WATCH CNN LIE CNN "journalists" parrot each other as they falsely claim Natasha Bertrand's initial reporting the Iran strike leak included the facts that it was a "low confidence" and "preliminary" report. Kate Bolduan proclaims: "...about it being low confidence. CNN reported on… pic.twitter.com/aKDMF4CXs1 — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) June 26, 2025   But that’s not true. Via the Wayback Machine, NewsBusters discovered CNN’s initial Tuesday posting of Bertrand’s controversial report. Nowhere in it does Bertrand use the words “low confidence” or “preliminary.” In fact, the only time the word “low” was even used was when she quoted White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt describing the leaker as “an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community.” Expanding “low” to other forms of the word, Bertrand’s other use was to suggest the strikes weren’t effective at all: Notably, the US struck Isfahan with Tomahawk missiles launched from a submarine instead of a bunker-buster bomb. That is because there was an understanding that the bomb would likely not successfully penetrate Isfahan’s lower levels, which are buried even deeper than Fordow, one of the sources said. Using the Wayback Machine again, NewsBusters found that the first time those words were used was following a Wednesday afternoon update the next day. But, she did not quote those words as having come from her source or the report itself. Instead, she was quoting Hegseth’s comments about it: Hegseth, who is also at the NATO summit, said Wednesday the assessment was “a top secret report; it was preliminary; it was low confidence;” adding that there were political motives behind leaking it and that an FBI investigation was underway to identify the leaker. With the help of SnapStream, NewsBusters went back to examine Bertrand’s initial on-air reporting about her story from Tuesday afternoon’s CNN News Central (the transcript for which is below). Again, nowhere did she use the words “low-confidence” or “preliminary.”   Here's Bertrand's initial appearance on CNN to push her story. Again, nowhere does she use the words "low confidence" or "preliminary." In fact, she implies just the opposite, proclaiming with confidence: "And so it appears that while these bombs did in fact inflict significant… pic.twitter.com/7bUIYxdMAt — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) June 26, 2025   Instead, she spoke with great confidence that what was leaked to her was the truth: And so it appears that while these bombs did in fact inflict significant damage on the aboveground structures at these nuclear facilities, the most sensitive and core parts of the nuclear program, which include the centrifuges, which include the highly enriched uranium, those do not appear to have been severely impacted, if impacted at all, with one of our sources who has seen the assessment describing all of those core components as largely intact. She also quoted Hegseth, but nothing about the assessment being “low confidence” or “preliminary.” It’s worth noting that Bertrand had a long history of pushing fake news. She was one of the “journalists” who claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was “Russian misinformation.” One of the contributors to her controversial report on the strike assessment was Katie Bo Lillis, who was one of the reporters responsible for CNN being found liable for malicious defamation of Navy veteran Zachary Young earlier this year. The transcripts are below. Click "expand" to read: CNN News Central June 24, 2025 3:24:22 p.m. Eastern (…) BORIS SANCHEZ: SANCHEZ: Well, let's get back to CNN national security correspondent, Natasha Bertrand, for the exclusive reporting. Natasha, what more are you learning? NATASHA BERTRAND, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Yes, Boris, so this is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency, which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm. And we do want to emphasize that the intelligence, of course, is ongoing. The collection is ongoing and the assessments as a result of that intelligence could change. But as of right now, the DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told was based on the battle damage assessment that U.S. Central Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that the U.S. carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what we are told is that based on the assessments of the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites, that as of right now, it does not appear that they ended or obliterated Iran's nuclear program. Instead, they only set it back by months, according to people who were briefed on the assessment. Now, these findings are obviously at odds with President Donald Trump's repeated assertions that the strikes, quote, ‘completely and totally obliterated Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities,’ something that has been echoed as well by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. But we did ask the White House for comments on this, and they appeared to acknowledge the existence of the assessment, but they said that they disagreed with it. According to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, she said, quote, "This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong. She said it was classified as top secret, but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop 14 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration." Now, it's worth noting that there has been some disagreement within the intelligence community and the defense community about just what kind of impact these massive bunker-busting 30,000-pound bombs would actually have on Iranian nuclear facilities, because they have never been used in combat before. They have been tested extensively, but when it comes to actually dropping them on Iranian nuclear facilities, many of which are very deeply buried underground, the impact of those bombs has been unclear. And so, it appears that while these bombs did, in fact, inflict significant damage on the above-ground structures at these nuclear facilities, the most sensitive and core parts of the nuclear program, which include the centrifuges, which include the highly enriched uranium, those do not appear to have been severely impacted, if impacted at all, with one of our sources who has seen the assessment describing all of those core components as largely intact. And so, this is obviously going to raise new questions about, you know, why President Trump and the administration have been saying repeatedly that Iran's nuclear program has essentially been ended, that it has been completely obliterated. But we should also note that Secretary of Defense Hegseth did give us a statement as well, and he said that, “Based on everything we have seen, and I've seen it all, our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons. Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran, so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission.” Now, it is worth emphasizing again that while the damage, we are told, according to this DIA assessment, was largely limited to the above ground structures, those above ground structures are not insignificant. They include site's power infrastructure, they include some of those facilities that are used to actually turn uranium into metal for bomb making. But again, this very early assessment suggests that the military strikes that were carried out on Saturday may not have gone as far as President Trump has suggested they have. Boris, Brianna. SANCHEZ: Natasha, please stand by. (…) CNN News Central June 26, 2025 8:46:33 a.m. Eastern (…) KATE BOLDUAN: But at the same time, we do need to make clear that despite the emotional speech and outrage from the Defense Secretary, what he said about the DIA assessment is what CNN reported on. His issue, that he took about it being preliminary, about it being low confidence. CNN reported on all of on all of this. I was looking back just to make sure that we had it all throughout the reporting process, CNN had reported that it is preliminary and of course, can be updated, including these two parts. “It is still early,” we reported in our initial report, “for the U.S. to have a comprehensive picture of the impact of the strikes. None of the sources described how the DIA assessment compares to the views of other agencies in the intelligence community. The U.S. is continuing to pick up intelligence, including from within Iran, as they assess the damage.” Also in CNN reporting where he, the Secretary, took real issue and seemed very upset about it not being stated that this was – there was low confidence stated in this assessment. SARA SIDNER: It’s in there. BOLDUAN: It's also in CNN reporting, including this, “the final U.S. military battle damage assessment by the DIA could take days or even weeks to complete. Multiple sources familiar with the Pentagon's process told CNN. The initial DIA analysis was produced just 24 hours after the attack, according to one of the sources, because it was only a preliminary analysis, its judgments were ‘low-confidence,’ the sources said. It was not coordinated with the wider intelligence community, according to a U.S. Official, and the document itself acknowledged that it could take weeks to produce a finalized assessment.” So just to put so - SIDNER: It is literally what he said we did not report. BOLDUAN: It is, a preliminary report. It is a preliminary report. The reporting was done. And now to a lot of the questions that still remain honest, questions that everyone in that room should be asked, that he had been berating the honest questions about any U.S. military operation. Those do continue. SIDNER: And we should also point out that on Wednesday, we quoted Hegseth himself saying that this was a preliminary low confidence report. So the reporting has been out there. (…)

Factcheck.org may not have a truth-o-meter like PolitiFact or a Pinocchio scale like The Washington Post, but their Tuesday article by Alan Jaffe still claimed that President Trump was false in saying that the B-2 strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities “obliterated” their program. One of Jaffe's main points of evidence was the fate of Iran's centrifuges, but even his own selected expert has contradicted him elsewhere. The crux of Jaffe’s argument was, “the key nuclear sites — Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan– were not ‘obliterated,’ nor was damage done ‘to all Nuclear sites in Iran.’ And Iran’s nuclear enrichment capability is still viable, experts say.” He also pointed to the infamous CNN and New York Times articles as his main source, “A five-page, preliminary, classified report from the Defense Intelligence Agency, the intelligence arm of the Pentagon, said the U.S. bombing of Iran’s three sites sealed off entrances of two facilities but didn’t destroy their underground buildings and set back Iran’s nuclear program by just a few months, CNN and the New York Times reported on June 24. People familiar with the report told CNN the facilities’ centrifuges, which enrich uranium, remained largely ‘intact.’” Jaffe also reported that both Israel and the IAEA believe Iran moved uranium from the Fordo facility in preparation for an attack. He also quotes, “David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, told NPR, ‘I think you have to assume that significant amounts of this enriched uranium still exist, so this is not over by any means.’”  That’s funny because if you click Jaffe’s link, he also tells NPR, contrary to CNN’s claim about centrifuges, “I think the purpose of the attack was to take out centrifuges and infrastructure and they feel they accomplished that." The very next paragraph in NRP’s story has Albright claiming that the entrances Jaffe mentioned were sealed by Iran in preparation for an attack. While Albright is cautious about declaring victory given the unknown location of enriched uranium stocks and possible centrifuges located elsewhere, his group is not as pessimistic as CNN, “Overall, Israel's and U.S. attacks have effectively destroyed Iran’s centrifuge enrichment program. It will be a long time before Iran comes anywhere near the capability it had before the attack.” The IAEA has agreed. On X, Albright wrote, “The time Iran would need to build even a non-missile deliverable nuclear weapon has increased significantly.” Additionally, the words “low confidence” do not appear anywhere in Jaffe’s article. Jaffe ends his essay by citing Arms Control Association Executive Director Daryl Kimball with an opinion on how the strikes affected the political situation, ‘“The bottom line is that the combined Israeli and U.S. strikes have set Iran’s program back some months, but at the cost of obliterating trust between the key parties, strengthening Tehran’s resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities, possibly prompting it to consider withdrawing from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and possibly proceeding to weaponization,’ Kimball said.” Jaffe’s article was published on Tuesday, but on Monday, Iran said it would remain a part of the NPT. It is true that battle damage assessment takes some time, but there are also several good and, most importantly, nonpartisan reasons to believe the CNN and New York Times articles have serious problems.  

PCGamesN serves up all of the latest videogame news to millions of readers across the globe every month. If you know your League of Legends from your Dota, or you prefer whiling away the hours in World of Warcraft or Civilization, then we want to hear from you. Continue reading We're hiring! PCGamesN is looking for a Deputy News Editor

I’m a sucker for a DIY project, so this homemade Steam Deck controller is right up my alley. Using some spare parts, a 3D printer, and plenty of patient trial and error, a hardware modder has put together his own take on a Steam Controller 2, complete with trackpads and a chassis that splits into two parts, taking inspiration directly from Nintendo in the process. It’s been a while since fresh Steam Controller 2 rumors gave any hint of an official new game controller from Valve, leaving modders like this one to take matters into their own hands. This controller shares a number of features you’d see in the Steam Deck, with the joysticks, d-pads, and trackpads all placed in a very similar layout to what you’d find in the best handheld out there right now. Continue reading This DIY Steam Deck controller splits in two, inspired by the Nintendo Switch MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best graphics card, Best gaming PC, Best SSD for gaming

The Persona 5 Phantom X system requirements are welcome news to gacha enthusiasts with a budget or older gaming PC, as you won't need the latest and greatest hardware to start playing. While it's clear you won't need the best graphics card to play the game, you'll need to consider making some room on your hard drive for a chunky game file. Persona 5 The Phantom X is quite the mouthful in terms of its title, and this free-to-play game has already got fans playing in record numbers for the Persona series. Continue reading Persona 5 The Phantom X system requirements MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best graphics card, Best gaming PC, Best SSD for gaming

Finding the best Fortnite settings is a tricky endeavour, largely because the built-in auto-detect feature can't be trusted. It ignores the importance of a buttery smooth frame rate in favor of simply maxing out the graphical settings to make the game look as good as possible. Having the best graphics card that money can buy would be overkill for a game like Fortnite, with optimized settings being the real key to success, and this is where we can help. If your in-game settings are too high for your PC, this can cause problems with your frame rate, but this can be easily avoided. However, before you even boot the game, it's best to check out the Fortnite system requirements to double-check that your gaming PC is up to the task from the get-go. Continue reading Best Fortnite settings for PC and Steam Deck MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Fortnite map, Fortnite skins, Fortnite weapons

What are the new Umamusume Pretty Derby codes? Welcome to the racecourse! Now finally available on PC around the globe, the famed anime horse girl racing game is flying out of the gate. And while launch day rewards are aplenty, new Umamusume Pretty Derby game codes are set to be another fantastic way to keep your bipedal mares and fillies in tip-top shape. Looking for more ways to try your luck after playing Umamusume: Pretty Derby? Saddle up with the best gacha games on PC. With more and more making the jump from mobile, there's no shortage of free pulls and daily grind rabbitholes to dive down. Take Persona 5 The Phantom X codes, for example. That launched day and date with this one. Continue reading Umamusume Pretty Derby codes June 2025 MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best gacha games, Best PC games you can play on mobile, Best new games

If you’re looking for a soothing and memorable open-world game, one that strikes out from the modern trends of objective spam and map clutter, you won’t want to miss this week’s Epic Games Store free game. Sable, the 2021 adventure game created by indie studio Shedworks, is available free to keep right now, and that makes it an easy recommendation. Continue reading Gorgeous open-world game Sable is now totally free, and you deserve to play it MORE FROM PCGAMESN: The best indie games on PC, The best relaxing games on PC, The best open-world games on PC

The original version of Crysis is no longer available for purchase on Steam.

Some anime have stories so compelling, characters so layered, and worlds so rich that they deserve the best animation studios Japan has to offer. But not every gem gets the polish it needs. Whether due to tight production schedules, underfunded studios, or questionable creative choices, several otherwise brilliant anime have ended up looking rushed, awkward, or outright unfinished.