During a typical work week here at Twitchy, we may occasionally cover some heavy topics. So, when we have a moment to cover something funny that also makes a political statement we agree with, well, we…

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) has sparked a firestorm by suggesting that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he opposed Israel’s nuclear program, a claim that’s sending shockwaves…

Quebec provincial police continued to search Tuesday for missing occupants of a helicopter that crashed in a lake on Quebec’s North Shore last week.On Monday evening, provincial police divers found…

Brought to you by RevelationMedia:Each passing moment brings us one step closer to the end times. Concerned? Keep an eye out for these signs that the tribulation is at hand.Here are 7 prophetic signs…

Welp, it looks like Trump bombed Iran. The Babylon Bee has assembled headlines from various media outlets here in one place so you can pick a little bit of the truth out of each to learn the whole story.Here's…

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Get a load of this total dweeb of a congressman who still thinks we care about what the Constitution says.That's what many are reportedly saying around the nation's capitol about…

Sen. Patty Murray seems to be getting her "facts" from The Guardian, which recently published a piece on Veterans Affairs hospitals removing "politics and marital status from guidelines protecting patients…

Site has no Description

The post Trump Goes Nuclear as Middle East Cease Fire is Immediately Violated appeared first on SALTY.

Written in collaboration with Privacy Rights Clearinghouse Hundreds of data brokers have not registered with state consumer protection agencies. These findings come as more states are passing data broker transparency laws that require brokers to provide information about their business and, in some cases, give consumers an easy way to opt out. In recent years, California, Texas, Oregon, and Vermont have passed data broker registration laws that require brokers to identify themselves to state regulators and the public. A new analysis by Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (PRC) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) reveals that many data brokers registered in one state aren’t registered in others. Companies that registered in one state but did not register in another include: 291 companies that did not register in California, 524 in Texas, 475 in Oregon, and 309 in Vermont. These numbers come from data analyzed from early April 2025. PRC and EFF sent letters to state enforcement agencies urging them to investigate these findings. More investigation by states is needed to determine whether these registration discrepancies reflect widespread noncompliance, gaps and definitional differences in the various state laws, or some other explanation. New data broker transparency laws are an essential first step to reining in the data broker industry. This is an ecosystem in which your personal data taken from apps and other web services can be bought and sold largely without your knowledge. The data can be highly sensitive like location information, and can be used to target you with ads, discriminate against you, and even enhance government surveillance. The widespread sharing of this data also makes it more susceptible to data breaches. And its easy availability allows personal data to be obtained by bad actors for phishing, harassment, or stalking. Consumers need robust deletion mechanisms to remove their data stored and sold by these companies. But the potential registration gaps we identified threaten to undermine such tools. California’s Delete Act will soon provide consumers with an easy tool to delete their data held by brokers—but it can only work if brokers register. California has already brought a handful of enforcement actions against brokers who failed to register under that law, and such compliance efforts are becoming even more critical as deletion mechanisms come online. It is important to understand the scope of our analysis. This analysis only includes companies that registered in at least one state. It does not capture data brokers that completely disregard state laws by failing to register in any state. A total of 750 data brokers have registered in at least one state. While harder to find, shady data brokers who have failed to register anywhere should remain a primary enforcement target. This analysis also does not claim or prove that any of the data brokers we found broke the law. While the definition of “data broker” is similar across states, there are variations that could require a company to register in one state and not another. To take one example, a data broker registered in Texas that only brokers the data of Texas residents would not be legally required to register in California. To take another, a data broker that registered with Vermont in 2020 that then changed its business model and is no longer a broker, would not be required to register in 2025. More detail on variations in data broker laws is outlined in our letters to regulators. States should investigate compliance with data broker registration requirements, enforce their laws, and plug any loopholes. Ultimately, consumers deserve protections regardless of where they reside, and Congress should also work to pass baseline federal data broker legislation that minimizes collection and includes strict use and disclosure limits, transparency obligations, and consumer rights. Read more here: California letter Texas Letter Oregon Letter Vermont Letter Spreadsheet of data brokers