YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #trafficsafety #assaultcar #carviolence #stopcars #notonemore #carextremism #endcarviolence #tennessee #bancarsnow #stopcrashing #pedestriansafety #tragedy #thinkofthechildren #memphis #chswarriors
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

Martin Luther vs. John Calvin: The French vs the German Reformation
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Martin Luther vs. John Calvin: The French vs the German Reformation

  As more and more souls turned to Calvinism‚ the Lutherans felt threatened‚ and some even allied with the Catholics. Why would the Protestants fight against each other? Were they really so different? Despite attempts to find common ground‚ they never did. Their differences were mainly political and even personal in some cases. What made these two confessions so distinct? Let us look carefully at the teachings of the two founders‚ John Calvin and Martin Luther.   Before John Calvin and Martin Luther: Humanism vs the Middle Ages Six Tucscan Poets‚ by Giorgio Vasari‚ 1544‚ via Minneapolis Institue of Art   Martin Luther grew up in a monastery and honored St. Augustine and the Church Fathers. In his youth‚ he studied the scholastics and underwent many classical disputations. His movement and teaching started a new era‚ yet Luther remained deeply rooted in the Middle Ages in regard to his thinking‚ philosophy‚ and even his language. Whenever Luther wrote in Latin‚ his Latin was dry and straightforward.   John Calvin‚ however‚ used complex humanistic Latin phrases that he learned from Cicero. Calvin was a humanist‚ a preacher a generation younger than Luther; he grew up studying humanistic texts‚ loved antiquity‚ and shared the humanist’s belief that humans should be at the center of all things. His famous saying‚ “Without the knowledge of self‚ there is no knowledge of God‚” expressed his belief that God should be studied through man. This represents the shift in thinking from the Middle Ages to the humanism of the Renaissance.   How Does Philosophy Fit into All This Portrait of John Calvin‚ by French School‚ 17th century‚ via Wikimedia Commons   John Calvin was an educated philosopher. He read the classical works of Roman and Greek authors. His favorite was Seneca‚ and Calvin loved stoic philosophy. Calvinist morals were partly derived from Seneca. The Calvinists accept their fate with stoic calm like the Lutherans never did.   As a humanist‚ Calvin encouraged even common people to read and educate themselves on philosophy. While Martin Luther started as a university professor and a monk‚ Calvin preached to wealthy and educated townspeople. Luther despised philosophy‚ and humanism the worst of all. Luther remained scholastic‚ meaning he held that philosophy is beneath Theology. However‚ Luther encouraged ordinary people to read the Scripture‚ thus bringing a rise in literacy. Philosophy should remain at university‚ where it could not do much damage.   How They Approached the Catholic Church Luther at the Diet of Worms‚ by Anton von Werner‚ 1877‚ via State Gallery of Stuttgart   Martin Luther was the first person in history to create a separate church within the Western Catholic see. Before him‚ something like that was unimaginable. All the reformers‚ like John Wycliffe‚ John Hus and his Hussite followers‚ and Catherine of Sienna‚ reformist monastic orders‚ criticized the church and wanted to change it‚ sometimes significantly and to various ends. But none dared to think they should break the church apart. Neither did Luther in the beginning. If you told the young Luther that one day his teaching would tear Christianity in half‚ he might have locked himself in his cell‚ ripped out his tongue‚ and maimed his hands to prevent that from happening. Yet‚ his circumstances and further developments drove Luther to establish the German church‚ although he still had doubts. In one of his letters‚ he explained his reluctance to marry due to these doubts. He was still unsure whether or not he would not burn in hell for what he did‚ and could not have a family under these circumstances.   John Calvin did not have to go through such mental torment. Luther paved the path for him; Calvin lived in a world where the scission already happened. The German church had already split off from the Catholic Sea‚ which was good for them. While Luther started with the thought of reforming the Catholic world‚ writing supportive letters to the Pope‚ and being willing to attend councils organized by archbishops‚ Calvinism was not open to discussion.   Martin Luther and John Calvin: As Different as Can Be Portrait of John Calvin‚ Unknown author‚ 1550‚ via Wikimedia Commons   Luther was a plump‚ pleasant man with a sense of humor‚ and although he suffered from depression‚ he was a friendly company. He liked good beer and food and enjoyed the world’s pleasures with reason and without doubts. His letters are full of witty remarks‚ and for all‚ we know about the German reformer‚ he got along well with people around him‚ including his wife and children.   Calvin was a clever charismatic leader with a stern look and strict morals. He lacked even a basic sense of humor and‚ with age‚ grew pricky and paranoid. These different characteristics are reflected in the religions the two men founded. While Lutherans kept beautiful paintings in their churches and did not lead the believers to become ascetics‚ the Calvinists are famous for their strict moral values and strenuous approach to work.   Predestination and Morals Illustration from History of the Great Reformation in Europe in the Times of Luther and Calvin‚ by Merle d’Aubigné and Jean Henri‚ 1870‚ via The Library of Congress   Calvinism emphasized predestination‚ the idea that all is set in stone and that our deeds have no meaning. While Luther agreed with this idea (crafted by St. Augustine)‚ he never emphasized it‚ and predestination remained a theological concept debated at universities.   Among the Calvinists‚ the notion of predestination was widely known and led to a pessimistic worldview. Moreover‚ the Lutheran moral code did not differ much from that of Catholics. The Calvinists despised all worldly pleasures and fine clothes — both Calvinist women and men dressed in black‚ with no jewels and no fancy hairdos. With no lavish parties and clothes to spend their money on‚ the Calvinists invested in their work and businesses. It was the religion of townspeople and contributed highly to the development of the business social class.   Calvin was very severe when judging the morals of the people in his city and encouraged his followers to do the same. This resulted in people spying on each other. People learned to behave differently in public and at home. In Geneva‚ even today‚ you won’t find any curtains. The Calvinists would not put curtains in their windows‚ publicly showing they had nothing to hide. Still‚ even the Genevans were people and did what people do. Thus‚ natural family life took place in the rooms far from the windows.   Language and Geography Luther posting his 95 theses in 1517‚ by Ferdinand Pauwels‚ 1872‚ via Wikimedia Commons   Martin Luther spoke German and founded the church in Saxony‚ naming it the German Church. During the 16th and 17th centuries‚ Lutherans remained in German-speaking regions. In bilingual and multilingual countries‚ the Germans usually proclaimed themselves Lutheran‚ and Lutheranism allied itself with nationalism in the 19th century.   Luther’s Bible contributed to the development of the German tongue‚ as did Luther’s emphasis on literacy. On the contrary‚ John Calvin spoke French but began his journey in Strasbourg‚ a free city with ties to the German and French worlds. Although the Calvinist Reformation started as a French-speaking movement and spread through France‚ pushing it into the turmoil of religious wars‚ it did not ally with the French language as such. Maybe‚ because in France itself‚ the Huguenots (French Calvinists) were suppressed by the crown. Calvinism then spread through Holy Roman Empire‚ conquering many German-speaking areas.   John Calvin and the Arts Looting of the Churches of Lyon by the Calvinists in 1562‚ by Antoine Caron‚ 1565‚ via Wikipedia Commons   Perhaps the most striking difference between the two confessions is their approach to the arts. The Lutherans promoted the arts‚ and their churches may not be as lavish as the baroque Catholic houses of devotion‚ but they were not bare either. And indeed‚ Martin Luther did not encourage anybody to destroy works of art. Luther was a man of the old world. He kept back from any spark that may start a fire. The German reformer was anxious not to cause any change in the social order of things‚ not even for just cases. John Calvin lacked any such prejudices and was confident that the paintings‚ statues‚ and holy objects depicting the saints‚ Jesus‚ or even God were blasphemy and against the Ten Commandments. Thus‚ the Calvinists cleansed any church within their grasp‚ destroying relics and works of art alike. Their houses of devotion were simple‚ with bare white walls and a single white cross in the center. Nothing should distract the believers from the holy message that they were listening to.   John Calvin and Martin Luther church window in City church of Wiesloch‚ via Wikimedia Commons   While reading this article‚ you may feel that the Lutheran and Calvinist confessions have nothing in common. Yet‚ today when you enter a Protestant church‚ it might be difficult for you to tell whether John Calvin or Martin Luther stood at the beginning. After the dust created by the religious wars of the 17th century had settled‚ it became clear that neither the dogma nor the founders’ character kept the confessions apart.   The political interests of different rulers and social classes drove the confessions against each other. Thus‚ today we may wonder why these two Protestant confessions never united. We are living in ecumenic times. Pastors of different confessions speak on TV; believers of other religions sit in the same pub and discuss their faith over beer or coffee. When the first Lutherans and Calvinists lived‚ the church had its political agenda and watched over every aspect of people’s lives. That made any discussion difficult.
Like
Comment
Share
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
Fun Facts And Interesting Bits
2 yrs ·Youtube

YouTube
How Copying Nature Helps Engineers
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
2 yrs

Mother Finds Baby Sucked Up by Tornado Laying 'Gently' in a Tree
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

Mother Finds Baby Sucked Up by Tornado Laying 'Gently' in a Tree

Her boyfriend was in the living room with the sleeping baby and saw the tornado pick up his bassinet. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
2 yrs

'Yellowstone' Star Jen Landon Sells Eco-Friendly California Home
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

'Yellowstone' Star Jen Landon Sells Eco-Friendly California Home

She made a tidy profit for herself. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Country Roundup
Country Roundup
2 yrs

50 Merry Country Christmas Songs to Get You in the Spirit
Favicon 
tasteofcountry.com

50 Merry Country Christmas Songs to Get You in the Spirit

Drinking Christmas songs‚ romantic Christmas songs‚ rowdy Christmas songs and spiritual Christmas songs all make this list. Continue reading…
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs ·Youtube

YouTube
Poor‚ Poor Hunter Biden
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
2 yrs

rumbleOdysee
Hack CONSTANTLY interrupts Vivek while trying to manipulate the audience...it DOESN'T go as planned
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
2 yrs

rumbleOdysee
YOU are the carbon the want to reduce
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
2 yrs

Study Claims Around 70 Percent Of Deaths After Pfizer COVID-19 Jab In Japan Occurred Within 10 Days
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Study Claims Around 70 Percent Of Deaths After Pfizer COVID-19 Jab In Japan Occurred Within 10 Days

A new peer-reviewed Japanese study claims around 70 percent of people who died in Japan after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 jab passed away within the first 10 days of the shot. “After BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination‚ 1‚311 deaths were identified in Group 1‚ including 662 males and 649 females‚ with a mean (standard deviation) age of 82.8 (8.5) years. A total of 247 deaths were identified in Group 2‚ with 155 males and 92 females‚ with a mean age of 47.1 (13.7) years. The percentage of reported cases that experienced death within 10 days after vaccination was 71% in Group 1 and 70% in Group 2‚” the study‚ published in the Cureus journal on December 7th‚ writes. Dr. Kat Lindley writes: Around 70 percent of people who died in Japan after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine lost their lives in the first 10 days following the jab‚ according to a recent study. The peer-reviewed Japanese study‚ published in the Cureus journal on Dec. 7‚ looked at the association between Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination and deaths within 10 days of vaccination. The risk period was defined as within 10 days of vaccination‚ with vaccination day being Day 1‚ and the control period defined as 11 to 180 days after vaccination. The analysis was divided into two groups: Group 1 representing individuals aged 65 and above and Group 2‚ which included people aged 64 and below. The researcher identified 1‚311 deaths in Group 1‚ which included 662 males and 649 females. In Group 2‚ the team identified 247 deaths—155 males and 92 females. “The percentage of reported cases that experienced death within 10 days after vaccination was 71 percent in Group 1 and 70 percent in Group 2‚” said the study results. Around 70 percent of people who died in Japan after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine lost their lives in the first 10 days following the jab‚ according to a recent study. The peer-reviewed Japanese study‚ published in the Cureus journal on Dec. 7‚ looked at the association… pic.twitter.com/qLvi7CYQAo — Dr. Kat Lindley (@KLVeritas) December 14‚ 2023 “In Group 1‚ more women than men died overall from various medical conditions in the first 10 days of vaccination. Following the 10 days‚ there were more deaths reported of men‚” The Epoch Times writes. “In Group 2‚ over two times more men died than women from various medical conditions during the first 10 days of vaccination. Overall deaths after the initial 10 days were only slightly higher among men‚” the outlet added. More details from Cureus: In Group 1‚ regarding the outcomes in ≥20 cases‚ the sex ratios during the risk period were lower than those during the control period for conditions including ischemic heart disease‚ aortic aneurysm/dissection‚ intracerebral hemorrhage‚ subarachnoid hemorrhage‚ cerebral infarction‚ interstitial lung diseases‚ pneumonia‚ aspiration pneumonia/asphyxia‚ marasmus‚ and unexplained deaths. The accumulation of these outcomes may have resulted in a lower sex ratio during the risk period for all-cause deaths. As Yamashita et al. indicated in 2022‚ the reasons for the low sex ratios are believed to be that women’s body weight in Japan is generally lower than that in the USA and European countries and that women’s immune responses to vaccines are stronger than those of men. No significant differences were observed between the sex ratios by period across any of the outcomes. One contributing factor for this is thought to be the limited number of cases for each outcome. In Group 2‚ regarding the outcomes in ≥20 cases‚ the sex ratios during the risk period were higher than those during the control period for conditions including ischemic heart disease‚ subarachnoid hemorrhage‚ and unexplained deaths. No significant differences were observed between the sex ratios by period across any of the outcomes. This is thought to be due‚ in part‚ to the small number of cases for each outcome. The sex ratio for myocarditis/pericarditis during the risk period was 800‚ which was eight times higher than that during the control period. However‚ the number of cases was small (17 cases). Since autopsies were performed in only nine of the 51 cases of unexplained deaths‚ some myocarditis/pericarditis cases may be included within the unexplained deaths category. Myocarditis is a complication of vaccination‚ especially in young adults and adolescent males. One contributing factor for the high sex ratio of all-cause deaths during the risk period is thought to be the high number of myocarditis/pericarditis deaths including undiagnosed cases. “If less than 14 days since [inoculation] you are officially ‘unvaccinated.’ See how that works‚” Kelly DNP‚ a clinical research whistleblower‚ commented. If less than 14 days since you are officially “unvaccinated” See how that works https://t.co/o2Tlcs2EiX — Kelly DNPFunctional/Integrative Med (@kacdnp91) December 14‚ 2023 The Epoch Times reports: The data on death numbers for the study were sourced from Japan’s Ministry of Health‚ Labour‚ and Welfare (MHLW). Specifically‚ cases involving only the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccination reported between Feb. 17‚ 2021‚ and March 12‚ 2023‚ were included. The study does not directly link the deaths with the vaccinations. “The results indicate that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination may influence the occurrence of death during the risk period‚” said the study. The author pointed to some of the limitations of the study including that the number of days from vaccination to death may vary depending on treatment‚ and that the study did not consider the effects of the vaccination after 11 days. Besides this‚ the author said the sex-based reporting could have only been performed by a few doctors‚ and that the mortality rates could not be calculated because the analysis was performed only for deaths after vaccination. The study had a limited sample size‚ and hence should be “carefully” interpreted. “Finally‚ the analysis results should be carefully interpreted because not all deaths reported to the MHLW were related to vaccination. Incidental deaths may be included in the reported deaths.” The study author stressed that since vaccines are administered to mostly healthy individuals‚ it should have a “higher level of safety than pharmaceuticals used for treatment and should have an exceptionally low vaccination mortality rate.” Read the full study at the Cureus journal.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
2 yrs

UPDATE: GOP-Controlled House Passes NDAA‚ Extends Warrantless Surveillance Powers
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

UPDATE: GOP-Controlled House Passes NDAA‚ Extends Warrantless Surveillance Powers

The House of Representatives on Thursday passed the $886 billion National Defense Authorization Act‚ which now heads to Joe Biden’s desk. The defense policy bill‚ which passed in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday‚ includes an amendment to extend Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). U.S. Senate Approves National Defense Authorization Act‚ Extends FISA Warrantless Spying Section 702 gives the federal government the power to conduct warrantless spying on foreigners abroad and Americans they interact with. It was set to expire at the end of the year‚ but the extension pushes the expiration date back to April 19th. “Here are the 118 Representatives who voted to protect your right to privacy. (Nay to FISA warrantless surveillance as part of NDAA). We lost but it was close. We needed 143 votes (1/3) to stop FISA since they suspended the rules to bring it to the floor‚” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) commented. Here are the 118 Representatives who voted to protect your right to privacy. (Nay to FISA warrantless surveillance as part of NDAA) We lost but it was close. We needed 143 votes (1/3) to stop FISA since they suspended the rules to bring it to the floor. https://t.co/xqMeOn8SKM pic.twitter.com/2hgHHdgY6z — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) December 14‚ 2023 In total‚ 147 Republicans and 163 Democrats approved the massive bill to fund the Pentagon and other military expenditures. Here are the public servants who voted to protect Americans’ privacy: Investigative journalist Laura Loomer listed the 147 House Republicans who voted yes on the NDAA without removing funding for the FISA courts. Here is a list of 147 @HouseGOP members who just voted YES on the NDAA without removing funding for the unconstitutional FISA courts. Notice @SpeakerMcCarthy is one of them. Son of a bitch is trying to let Democrats take back control of the House and have a fully funded FISA… pic.twitter.com/TCGOEhfs9P — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) December 14‚ 2023 POLITICO reports: The 310-118 vote on the annual policy bill succeeded despite conservative opposition to a short-term extension of federal surveillance powers and the lack of hardline provisions on abortion‚ transgender troops and diversity in the ranks. Speaker Mike Johnson brought the bill up for a vote under an expedited process that bypasses procedural votes that have sunk other bills in Republicans’ razor-thin majority. But the tactic required a two-thirds vote‚ meaning substantial opposition could have tanked the defense bill. Ultimately‚ 73 Republicans and 45 Democrats opposed the final defense bill. Despite being in the minority‚ Democrats supplied more votes to pass the bill than Republicans. While the compromise cleared with bipartisan support‚ it could still create another headache for Johnson‚ who is already taking heat from the GOP’s right flank over other issues. Hardliners‚ led by the conservative House Freedom Caucus‚ opposed the bill after congressional leaders attached a four-month renewal of spy powers that target foreigners’ communications. The authority‚ known as Section 702‚ is set to expire at the end of the year. Johnson has defended the move as necessary to buy time for lawmakers to agree to an overhaul of the program. Many hard-right members were also angered by what they contend is a lack of GOP wins in the final deal after House Republicans passed their own version of the bill replete with conservative policies in July. They’ve criticized negotiators for dropping House-approved measures to block the Pentagon’s abortion travel policy‚ bar coverage of gender-affirming medical care for transgender troops and prohibit drag shows on military bases. “The measure authorizes $300 million for the Pentagon to arm Ukraine. Another $14.7 billion was included for the Pacific Deterrence Initiative to boost U.S. military presence in the region to guard against China‚” the outlet added.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 91271 out of 99674
  • 91267
  • 91268
  • 91269
  • 91270
  • 91271
  • 91272
  • 91273
  • 91274
  • 91275
  • 91276
  • 91277
  • 91278
  • 91279
  • 91280
  • 91281
  • 91282
  • 91283
  • 91284
  • 91285
  • 91286
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund