Senator Mitch McConnell’s health appears to still be in decline. On Thursday, a reporter approached Senator Mitch McConnell at the Capitol and asked him, “Can you give us any information on why you blocked the SAVE Act?” McConnell, who was being pushed in a wheelchair by a staffer, declined to answer any questions. The reporter followed up on the question by asking McConnell for his thoughts on Rep. Tim Burchett’s claim that his office is being controlled by his staffers. Take a look: Mitch McConnell is asked why he is blocking the SAVE Act and about the allegations his staffers now make the decisions for him because he’s no longer mentally fit As he’s wheel chaired around he has a blank vacant stare. It’s like he can’t even comprehend what’s being asked We… pic.twitter.com/yNEU5q7nX9 — Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) February 27, 2026 Here’s the video by Burchett, the reporter was referring to: What is happening with Mitch McConnell and why is he stopping the SAVE AMERICA ACT? pic.twitter.com/76R6DSCVFw — Tim Burchett (@timburchett) February 20, 2026 This isn’t the first time McConnell has been in a wheelchair. Last week, he was spotted being pushed around the Capitol by staffers, too. Take a look: Sen. Mitch McConnell in a wheelchair on his way to vote against Tulsi Gabbard to be DNI pic.twitter.com/mrnIUjeRwH — Brennan Leach (@brennanleach) February 12, 2025 The New Republic has reported that McConnell has refused to schedule a vote for the election integrity legislation: Senator Mitch McConnell appears to be stalling the voting bill backed by President Trump, and fellow Republicans are not happy. McConnell, who leads the Senate Rules Committee, is refusing to schedule a vote on the legislation, thus preventing it from moving forward. The bill would create barriers for voting, requiring specific forms of ID in order for Americans to exercise their constitutional right. In blocking it, the retiring senator and former majority leader has drawn the ire of his colleagues. Representative Tim Burchett posted a video on X Friday saying McConnell’s actions are partially coming from a place of “meanness” because he doesn’t like Trump, and called his mental acuity into question. “He’s blocking the SAVE Act, or is he? Is it him or a staff member, because as you know, he’s a lot like Joe Biden was in his last few days in office, or last years in office,” Burchett said. “His cognizant level is diminishing daily.” Burchett went on a tangent about how much of Congress is run by staffers because certain aging members of Congress have diminishing mental capacity, citing the case of Representative Kay Granger, the former House Appropriations Committee chair who disappeared for months in 2024 and was later found to be living in an independent living facility. Mitch McConnell appears to be receiving full time health care on the job. Who is controlling him and at what point is this considered elder abuse? pic.twitter.com/hbyn8iOfGr — Jammles (@jammles9) February 26, 2026

The conservative restraint exercised by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was put on full display recently. For the most part, the case I’m talking about was overshadowed by the more high-profile SCOTUS ruling against President Trump’s tariff power. Though I must say — Thomas came down hard against that majority ruling as well! But it was in a much less nationally dramatic case that Thomas proved just how valuable he is to the court. And also how hard it is to maintain a conservative, originalist view of jurisprudence with so much JUDICIAL ACTIVISM coming from the Supreme Court itself. The case in question revolved around a murder case in Texas, in which a long (overnight) recess was necessary. And the recess happened right in the middle of the defendant’s testimony on the witness stand. I want to dive into the particulars to show how carefully Justice Thomas works to WITHSTAND the potential of judicial overreach.  (Call it legislating from the bench!) But before we dive in, check out this comment shared on X that perfectly sums up Thomas’ approach to the case in question: Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a masterclass in judicial restraint, rightly calling out the Supreme Court majority for needlessly expanding precedent in a unanimous ruling on trial procedures. Existing law was clear enough, yet the opinion pushed further anyway.This is… pic.twitter.com/qBIOITFBP9 — Arkadalo ® (@Arkadalo) February 25, 2026 Here’s the full text of that post, emphasizing just how RESISTANT Thomas is when it comes to EXPANDING the court’s power and precedent “needlessly” — as he put it: Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a masterclass in judicial restraint, rightly calling out the Supreme Court majority for needlessly expanding precedent in a unanimous ruling on trial procedures. Existing law was clear enough, yet the opinion pushed further anyway. This is exactly why President Trump has made restoring constitutional originalism a cornerstone of his agenda. Judges who stick to the text as written, not activist expansions, are what keep our republic strong and our freedoms secure. America wins when leaders like Trump demand nothing less. As that post highlighted, existing law was sufficient to handle the situation. There was no need for a new law, an expansion of judicial interpretation, or a “new rule” to be issued — which is exactly what happened… And that’s exactly what stirred up a fire in Thomas’ belly, because rather than rely on the existing law, precedent, and mechanisms in place, the majority decided to effectively CREATE A NEW RULE. “NEEDLESSLY”, according to Justice Clarence Thomas. And I think he was very right in that assessment. Here’s what happened in a nutshell, according to Fox News: Justice Clarence Thomas criticized the majority opinion in a Tuesday Supreme Court ruling that he says “needlessly” expanded court precedent on trial issues. Thomas made the argument in a concurring opinion to a unanimous decision the court released regarding the extent to which a trial judge can restrict interaction between a defendant and his attorneys during a trial recess. During the trial, Villareal’s testimony was interrupted by a 24-hour overnight recess, and the judge in the case instructed Villareal’s attorneys not to “manage his testimony” during the recess. The judge clarified, however, that the order was not a blanket restriction on Villareal’s communication with his attorneys. He said they could discuss topics other than the defendant’s testimony, such as possible sentencing issues. Villareal was ultimately convicted in the case, and his attorney’s appealed the decision by arguing the judge’s restrictions infringed on the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The case was ultimately appealed up to the Supreme Court, which ruled against the defendant’s argument. The court’s majority opinion, penned by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that court precedent allowed judges to restrict attorneys and their clients from discussing testimony in the middle of a trial. (Emphasis added.) Now, up to this point, Clarence Thomas essentially agreed with the majority. After all, it was a UNANIMOUS VOTE! He AGREED with the majority that the Judge in the case was correct when he instructed the murder defendant’s lawyers NOT to have any communications with him that would have constituted coaching or ‘managing’ his testimony. The reason being… he was effectively still in the MIDDLE of his testimony — during the recess. And therefore, according to EXISTING PRECEDENT and LAW, it would have been wholly improper for his lawyers to “help” him with his testimony on the stand while he’s actually giving it! The problem came in the form of EXCESIVE OVERREACH when Justice Jackson reasoned in the majority opinion that a CLARIFYING RULE needed to be put forward, to address the issue. But, it didn’t. There was precedent, existing law, and all the guidelines necessary to handle the situation. Which is what guided the judge in the murder trial to CORRECTLY handle the situation! But Jackson couldn’t help herself from reaching for more judicial authority. And Thomas couldn’t help HIMSELF — and thankfully pushed back against it, as covered in this overview from Courthousenews.com: Justice Clarence Thomas, a George H.W. Bush appointee, took issue with Jackson’s newly announced rule. “I cannot join the court’s opinion because it opines on hypothetical situations not before the court and needlessly expands our precedents,” Thomas wrote, concurring only in judgment. Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Donald Trump appointee, joined Thomas’ opinion. Thomas claimed that Jackson’s opinion “endorses a methodology under which any conflict between the Sixth Amendment and the desire for untutored testimony must be resolved in favor of the right to the assistance and guidance of counsel.” Thomas said the majority opinion wasn’t grounded in the original meaning of the Sixth Amendment. And he added that opining on matters not presented in Villarreal’s case wasn’t necessary to decide it. Jackson’s opinion was joined by every justice except Thomas and Gorsuch. She stated that the majority did not share Thomas’ view that the ruling “needlessly expands our precedents.” Here’s a screenshot of the cornerstone of Justice Thomas’ criticism of the majority opinion on the matter: And below is a portion of his own opinion, differentiating his vote from those he voted with in that he refused to accepted a “needless” increase in RULES and REGULATIONS and judicial OVERREACH. Check out the logic of Justice Thomas’ criticism of the majority opinion, as he explained it here: I cannot join the Court’s opinion because it opines on hypothetical situations not before the Court and needlessly expands our precedents. I therefore respectfully concur only in the judgment. While Villarreal was still on direct examination, the judge had to recess trial for the day due to a scheduling conflict. Ordinarily, a witness cannot consult with counsel during his testimony. The trial judge therefore instructed Villarreal’s counsel not to discuss Villarreal’s testimony overnight. But his order allowed Villarreal to confer with counsel about matters other than his ongoing testimony. The trial judge’s order here complied with our precedents. The trial judge instructed defense counsel not to “discuss what you couldn’t discuss with [Villarreal] if he was on the stand in front of the jury,” and explained that “you couldn’t confer with him while he was on the stand about his testimony.” I am unable to join the majority opinion because it unnecessarily expands these precedents. It purports to “announce” a “rule” under which a defendant has a constitutional right to “discussion of testimony” so long as that discussion is “incidental to other topics.” Ante, at 9, 11, 12, n. 5. It identifies new circumstances, not presented here, in which a defendant supposedly has a right to discuss matters related to his ongoing testimony. Did you catch that part about a new “constitutional right”? Justice Jackson doesn’t seem to have a problem creating those sorts of things out of thin air. Thankfully, there are at least TWO judges who still recognize that’s a problem: Thomas, and Gorsuch! Many will call this hair-splitting.  Semantics. But just remember… it’s in the shadow grey-areas and the ability to weasel in new meanings for words that the principles of straightforward rule of law gets eroded. And it’s in sharp-eyed Constitutionalists like Justice Clarence Thomas that such subtle attacks on our justice system get BEATEN BACK.

As you probably heard, it didn’t take long for Hillary Clinton’s Congressional testimony about Jeffrey Epstein to hit a snag. Of course, her lawyers threw a tantrum, immediately shutting things down. The fuss started when a photo of Hillary showed up on social media barely an hour into the proceedings. And Hillary was obviously not having a good day, judging by her expression. But the REAL fireworks came later, as I teased in the headline. The image itself wasn’t anything incredibly shocking — we’ve all seen Hillary Clinton’s sour face a thousand times before.  (Full body shiver…) But the fact that popular conservative X podcaster Benny Johnson was the ‘source’ of the image from inside the CLOSED-DOOR testimony didn’t go over well with everyone. Mostly… it didn’t go over well with Democrats. Here’s the photo at the center of the controversy, shared by Johnson. Along with the proper accrediting of Rep. Lauren Boebert for supplying the image: BREAKING: The first image of Hillary Clinton testifying under oath about Jeffery Epstein to the Republican Oversight Committee. This is the first time Hillary has had to answer real questions about Epstein. Clinton does not look happy. Photo provided by Rep. Lauren Boebert. pic.twitter.com/mPtUyA4u5i — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) February 26, 2026 As a public service announcement, I’ll go ahead and include both Benny Johnson and Rep. Boebert’s official “I did not kill myself” statements. Considering the Clinton track record, I don’t blame either of them for reiterating their current mental state: And I did not hang myself in my hotel room later tonight. — Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) February 26, 2026 But possibly the most controversial quote of the day didn’t come from Clinton — even though she swore (under oath) that she never even met Epstein. (???) Who knows where that statement might lead, as the investigation continues? But let’s be honest.  We all expected that answer. Rep. Lauren Boebert, on the other hand, didn’t try to put up a denial… She didn’t attempt to morally justify her actions of leaking the photo of Clinton… And she didn’t REALLY even try to give an “excuse” for doing so. When asked by a reporter why she did it, she answered with a very frank, “Why not?” Here’s a clip of that EPIC MOMENT captured by Fox News’ cameras: REPORTER: “Why did you send the picture?” BOEBERT: “Why not?!” Legend pic.twitter.com/atArf2GsNe — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) February 26, 2026 Pushed later for a more involved answer, she simply said that Benny Johnson had done nothing wrong by sharing the photo. And then she took a tongue-in-cheek swipe at the haters, commenting that “no Ambassadors” came to any harm as a result of sharing the photo, as reported by Newsweek: Representative Lauren Boebert took to social media Thursday afternoon to defend a photo she took of the closed-door deposition of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and sent to podcaster Benny Johnson. Boebert, a Colorado Republican, told reporters outside the House Oversight Committee hearing that she was not reprimanded for the photos she took, before posting on X that Johnson had done nothing wrong by sharing the image. “No U.S. Ambassadors were harmed in the taking of today’s photo,” she said in another post, appearing to seek to poke fun at the outrage over the image, which led to a pause in proceedings. The closed-door depositions in Chappaqua, New York, the hometown of Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton, come after months of tense back-and-forth between the high-powered Democratic couple and the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee. It will be the first time that a former president has been forced to testify before Congress. Hillary Clinton was testifying in a House investigation into Epstein, who visited Bill Clinton at the White House multiple times in the 1990s, according to visitor logs. After he left office, the former president flew multiple times on Epstein’s private jet. Hillary Clinton told lawmakers that she does not recall ever encountering Jeffrey Epstein in a closed-door deposition to the House Oversight Committee on Thursday. (Emphasis added.) As you would expect, Democrats were livid. But as others began pointing out on social media, if Rep. Lauren Boebert wound up in trouble for taking and leaking that photo… What should happen to Rep. Stacey Plaskett? Shout out to the always informative MJTruthUltra on X.com for this nugget a few months ago. He pointed out that Democrat Rep. Plaskett was ‘ACTIVELY TEXTING’ with Jeffrey Epstein while the Democrats were going after President Trump in a Congressional hearing! Check this out: HOLEE SHYT Jeffrey Epstein was ACTIVELY TEXTING House Democrats during the Cohen Hearing according to Document’s Democrat Stacey Plaskett was identified as one of those individuals. These communications appear to influenced her questions to Trump’s attorneys. Follow along… https://t.co/YNTtXNP80G pic.twitter.com/Ul47pphSyd — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) November 18, 2025 Here’s a full screen version of that clip for convenience: HOLEE SHYT Jeffrey Epstein was ACTIVELY TEXTING House Democrats during the Cohen Hearing according to Document’s Democrat Stacey Plaskett was identified as one of those individuals. These communications appear to influenced her questions to Trump’s attorneys. Follow along… https://t.co/YNTtXNP80G pic.twitter.com/Ul47pphSyd — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) November 18, 2025 That’s Jeffrey Epstein “colluding” — see what I did there? — with Congressional Democrats to influence the proceedings against President Trump in REAL TIME! And yet, somehow, Democrats have lost their mind over Rep. Boebert’s “leak” of a photo of Clinton… From a hearing that is SET TO BE RELEASED PUBLICLY, anyway? Yeah — get over it. But true to form, the Democrats had Clinton’s back — as has been reported by The Hill: Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee tore into Republicans on the panel after Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) leaked a photo from inside former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s deposition on Thursday. Ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said Clinton, who said she did not recall ever meeting Epstein, was “completely cooperating with the deposition and the committee” and “answering questions in full faith and in good faith.” “What is not acceptable is Oversight Republicans breaking their own committee rules that they established with the Secretary and her team,” Garcia said in statements to the press during a break in the deposition. “It was gracious of the Secretary and her team to continue the deposition.” “We are sitting through an incredibly unserious clown show of a deposition where members of Congress and the Republican Party are more concerned about getting their photo op of Secretary Clinton than actually getting to the truth and holding anyone accountable,” Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) said. Asked about the photo when returning to the deposition after a break, Boebert made a reference to the FBI’s investigation into a private email server Clinton used while secretary of State, which dominated the final stretch of her 2016 presidential campaign. “I just returned to my hotel room and installed the BleachBit software … So, I guess in regards to taking photos, I do not recall,” Boebert quipped. (Emphasis added.) If you noticed the section I highlighted in bold text from that article, you might wonder what “BleachBit software” is. Then again, knowing our readers… You’ll probably get that not-so-subtle dig at Hillary right off the bat. BleachBit was reportedly the software used to wipe Hillary’s emails from her “secret” server, apparently in an attempt to cover up communications related to the 2012 Benghazi attack. Well played, Boebert — well played, indeed. Meanwhile, the Democrats are still more upset with a soon-to-be-released image of Hillary getting out into the public space early… Than they are about the growing evidence that the Clinton’s were intimately involved with Jeffrey Epstein. What do you make of it?

President Trump told reporters on Friday that there may be a “friendly takeover” of Cuba. “The Cuban government is talking with us. They’re in a big deal of trouble as you know,” Trump said. “They have no money. They have no anything right now. But they’re talking with us,” he continued. “Maybe we’ll have a friendly takeover of Cuba. We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba,” he added. Check it out: NOW – Trump: "We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba." pic.twitter.com/xByy596J1j — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) February 27, 2026 The Hill has more: Trump imposed a fuel blockade on the island in an executive order at the end of January in a push to collapse the regime, which relies heavily on energy and food imports. The United Nations’s top official for Cuba warned on Wednesday that daily life on the island is “becoming fragile” with increased strains on health care, water services and food distribution. U.S. officials reportedly met Thursday with the grandson of 94-year-old former president Raúl Castro, considered the de facto leader of the totalitarian regime, on the sidelines of a conference in the Caribbean attended by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Castro’s grandson, Raúl Guillermo Rodriguez Castro, serves as his grandfather’s bodyguard and is believed to oversee Cuba’s armed forces’s conglomerate, known as GAESA, which controls much of the island’s economy. The Miami Herald reported that in 2024, GAESA had about $18 billion in assets and in unknown bank accounts. The Cuban government has instituted emergency measures to deal with the U.S. fuel quarantine and is said to have between six and seven weeks of fuel left before falling into a major blackout. “Cuba has turned to electric tricycles for local transport as fuel became scarce after the US cut off oil exports from Venezuela and threatened penalties for countries that supplied the island,” Reuters wrote earlier this month. Footage below: Cuba has turned to electric tricycles for local transport as fuel became scarce after the US cut off oil exports from Venezuela and threatened penalties for countries that supplied the island https://t.co/klCxt4GhM9 pic.twitter.com/GjZzTSBdSz — Reuters (@Reuters) February 16, 2026 Last month, a report in The Wall Street Journal claimed the Trump administration was hoping to “cut a deal” to facilitate the end of communist rule on the island nation. “Emboldened by the U.S. ouster of a Venezuelan strongman, the Trump administration is seeking Cuban government insiders who can help cut a deal to push out the Communist regime by year’s end,” the outlet wrote. Exclusive: Emboldened by the U.S. ouster of a Venezuelan strongman, the Trump administration is seeking Cuban government insiders who can help cut a deal to push out the Communist regime by year's end. https://t.co/yz7UwKKUbb — The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) January 22, 2026 POLITICO explained further: Trump’s comments come after Cuban border troops killed four Cubans from the U.S. and wounded six others during a confrontation Wednesday that Cuban authorities called an attempted terrorist attack. U.S. lawmakers from Florida have used the incident to call for regime change. All members were “Cuban residents of the United States,” the Cuban Interior Ministry said following the incident. Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-Fla.) said “We need that regime to go,” after the attack. “The regime is causing this humanitarian crisis in Cuba. And the faster they go, the faster that we can help the Cuban people.” The State Department on Thursday said that two people who participated in the confrontation were U.S. citizens — one of whom was killed during the standoff. On Friday, Trump said that many Cuban exiles would like to return home and are pleased with the pressure he is placing on the country’s regime. “Something could — I think very positive for the people that were expelled or worse from Cuba that live here,” he said. “We have people living here that want to go back to Cuba. They’re very happy with what’s going on.”

Former President Bill Clinton’s reputation for inappropriate behavior has long been a matter of public discussion, but a recent account from former Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly has revived the controversy with troubling new details. During a Thursday episode of her podcast, Kelly interviewed her former Fox News colleague Tucker Carlson and presented what she described as a disturbing photograph involving Clinton. Kelly recounted that two women she knows encountered the former president while they were at a bar. According to her description of the image, Clinton is shown directing his gaze toward one woman’s chest while placing his hand on the side of another woman’s breast. She noted that the incident allegedly took place roughly one year after Clinton’s impeachment. Kelly also emphasized that Hillary Clinton and their daughter, Chelsea, were reportedly present and witnessed what happened. “This is my own piece of evidence where he wasn’t shamed at all,” Kelly told Carlson. “Where a friend of mine and her friend at the time, this was in 1999, were in a bar and Bill Clinton was there.” “Look at this,” she continued. “He is looking down the chest of my friend Meg Florence, and that’s my other friend Abby Ritman. He basically got his hand on her side boob.” “And you probably know this place, The Bombay Club in D.C. He was there with his wife and daughter!” Watch here: And here is the photo: Meanwhile, Jeffrey Epstein reportedly visited Bill Clinton in the Oval Office 17 times. Yes, 17. Rep James Comer holds up the infamous photo of Bill Clinton in a dress found in Epstein’s home and explains that Bill nor his wife did not (today) and will now show up for the Epstein related Subpoena’s. “Epstein visited the White House 17 times while Bill Clinton was President”… pic.twitter.com/1sIaYl9PoA — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) January 13, 2026

Some people squeal like a pig… Some shriek like demons… According to reports from Nancy Mace, we got a little of both from Hillary Clinton yesterday behind closed doors! Quote: “She was unhinged!  You’ll see it.” Wow! Watch here: WOW! Rep. Nancy Mace says Hillary Clinton was SCREAMING during her Epstein deposition yesterday “I hope President Clinton is less UNHINGED today than his wife was yesterday!” I can’t WAIT to see these tapes pic.twitter.com/ob3SgS1GQq — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 27, 2026 I can’t wait to see these tapes!

Bill Clinton is perhaps the politician most known for lying for all time… “It depends what the meaning of ‘is’ is…” “I did not have sexual relations with that woman!” All lies. All BS. But he’s really stepped it up a notch with his new Opening Statement to Congress today before questioning… In the statement I’m about to show you, Bill claims he just had no idea at all what Epstein was up to, and if he had discovered what Epstein was doing he would have led the charge to turn him in himself! LAUGHABLE BILL! I mean, this is a real knee-slapper, even for you! Memo To Bill: the person you are describing, who discovered what Epstein was doing and immediately took action against him was Donald J. Trump. You? You continued to fly on the Lolita Express 27 times.  Allegedly.  Reportedly.  Almost certainly. Nice try Bill, but this is a doozy, even for you. Take a look (full text down below in easy to read format): As someone who grew up in a home with domestic abuse, not only would I not have flown on his plane if I had any inkling of what he was doing—I would have turned him in myself and led the call for justice for his crimes, not sweetheart deals. pic.twitter.com/0rX8cat5Pu — Bill Clinton (@BillClinton) February 27, 2026 FULL TEXT: PRESIDENT CLINTON’S OPENING STATEMENT TOTHE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENTREFORM COMMITTEE AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY | FEBRUARY 27, 2026NOTE: ONLY THE COMMITTEE CAN CONFIRM WHAT WAS DELIVERED IN THE ROOM Good morning. Welcome to Chappaqua. I’m here today for two reasons. The first is that I love my country. And America was built upon the idea that no person is above the law, even Presidents—especially Presidents. Democracy requires every person to play their part, and I hope that by being here today, we can bring ourselves a little further away from the brink and back to being a country where we can disagree with one another civilly—where the search for truth and justice outweighs the partisan urge to score points and create spectacle. I’ll do my part, and I hope you’ll do yours. The second reason I’m here is that the girls and women whose lives Jeffrey Epstein destroyed deserve not only justice, but healing. They’ve been waiting too long for both. Though my brief acquaintance with Epstein ended years before his crimes came to light, and though I never witnessed during our limited interactions any indication of what was truly going on, I am here to offer what little I know so that it might prevent anything like this from ever happening again. But before we start, I have to get personal. You made Hillary come in. She had nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. Nothing. She has no memory of even meeting him. She neither traveled with him nor visited any of his properties. Whether you subpoenaed 10 people or 10,000, including her was simply not right. We began this hearing with me raising my hand and taking an oath to tell the truth. But everyone has a responsibility to be honest with those they represent. Whether you raised your right hand or not, each and every one of us owes nothing less than truth and accuracy to the American people. PRESIDENT CLINTON’S OPENING STATEMENT(CONTINUED) Now, let me say what you’re going to hear from me. First, I had no idea of the crimes Epstein was committing. No matter how many photos you show me, I have two things that at the end of the day matter more than your interpretation of those 20-year-old photos. I know what I saw, and more importantly, what I didn’t see. I know what I did, and more importantly, what I didn’t do. I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong. As someone who grew up in a home with domestic abuse, not only would I not have flown on his plane if I had any inkling of what he was doing—I would have turned him in myself and led the call for justice for his crimes, not sweetheart deals. But even with 20 /20 hindsight, I saw nothing that ever gave me pause. We are only here because he hid it from everyone so well for so long. And by the time it came to light with his 2008 guilty plea, I had long stopped associating with him. You’ll often hear me say that I don’t recall. That might be unsatisfying. But I’m not going to say something I’m not sure of. This was all a long time ago. And I am bound by my oath not to speculate, or to guess. This is not merely for my benefit, but because it doesn’t help you for me to play detective 24 years later. Since I am under oath, I will not falsely state that I am looking forward to your questions. But I am ready to answer them to the best of my abilities, consistent with the facts as I know them: the legitimate, the logical, and even the outlandish. With that Mr. Chairman, fire away. RELATED REPORTS: Bill Clinton EXONERATES President Trump During Congressional Deposition on Epstein PERJURY TRAP COMPLETE? Former Advisor Claims Evidence Of Huge Hillary Lie To Congress! Yesterday, Hillary Clinton testified in a closed door session with Congress that she had never met Jeffrey Epstein. Then she came out and told the public the same thing in a press conference. To which I immediately responded: “Perjury trap complete?” Hillary Clinton: Hey guys… I just finished testifying. I answered every one of their questions honestly… I never met Jeffrey Epstein, never had any connection or communication with him — Ghislaine Maxwell wa only an acquaintance… PERJURY TRAP COMPLETE! pic.twitter.com/SptUBnPRNT — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) February 26, 2026 Now today, former Clinton adviser Steve Gill has told GBNews that there are pictures of Hillary with Jeffrey Epstein! UH OH!! I do believe lying to Congress is perjury and there are some pretty strict penalties for perjury, do I have that correct? Watch here: Former Clinton adviser Steve Gill on Ms. Clinton’s Epstein testimony: “There are pictures of her with Jeffrey Epstein, while she claims she never met the man!” pic.twitter.com/DNs7SYJG4v — Brandon Straka #WalkAway (@BrandonStraka) February 27, 2026 Backup here if needed: Uh ohhhh… Former Advisor to Bill Clinton says BOTH Bill and Hillary Clinton visited Epstein’s Zorro Ranch multiple times — there are Pictures of her with Epstein, despite her recent testimony stating she never met him. Steve Gill may need protection. lol… https://t.co/5d4Sh4Sxfe pic.twitter.com/jVSwLKceXm — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) February 27, 2026 Is Hillary finally going to go down? Finally going to face justice? Bill Clinton has also claimed he just had no possible idea what Jeffrey Epstein was up to, despite flying on his plane 27 times! BREAKING: Despite flying on Epstein’s plane 27 TIMES and appearing in COUNTLESS photos with him, Bill Clinton in his opening statement says he had NO IDEA what Epstein was doing “Even with 20/20 hindsight, I saw nothing that ever gave me pause.” Yeah, NOBODY believes that. pic.twitter.com/MDb4wiZPEi — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 27, 2026 Sorry Bill… Sorry Hill… No one is buying your BS anymore!

Yesterday, Hillary Clinton testified in a closed door session with Congress that she had never met Jeffrey Epstein. Then she came out and told the public the same thing in a press conference. To which I immediately responded: “Perjury trap complete?” Hillary Clinton: Hey guys… I just finished testifying. I answered every one of their questions honestly… I never met Jeffrey Epstein, never had any connection or communication with him — Ghislaine Maxwell wa only an acquaintance… PERJURY TRAP COMPLETE! pic.twitter.com/SptUBnPRNT — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) February 26, 2026 Now today, former Clinton adviser Steve Gill has told GBNews that there are pictures of Hillary with Jeffrey Epstein! UH OH!! I do believe lying to Congress is perjury and there are some pretty strict penalties for perjury, do I have that correct? Watch here: Former Clinton adviser Steve Gill on Ms. Clinton’s Epstein testimony: “There are pictures of her with Jeffrey Epstein, while she claims she never met the man!” pic.twitter.com/DNs7SYJG4v — Brandon Straka #WalkAway (@BrandonStraka) February 27, 2026 Backup here if needed: Uh ohhhh… Former Advisor to Bill Clinton says BOTH Bill and Hillary Clinton visited Epstein’s Zorro Ranch multiple times — there are Pictures of her with Epstein, despite her recent testimony stating she never met him. Steve Gill may need protection. lol… https://t.co/5d4Sh4Sxfe pic.twitter.com/jVSwLKceXm — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) February 27, 2026 Is Hillary finally going to go down? Finally going to face justice? Bill Clinton has also claimed he just had no possible idea what Jeffrey Epstein was up to, despite flying on his plane 27 times! BREAKING: Despite flying on Epstein’s plane 27 TIMES and appearing in COUNTLESS photos with him, Bill Clinton in his opening statement says he had NO IDEA what Epstein was doing “Even with 20/20 hindsight, I saw nothing that ever gave me pause.” Yeah, NOBODY believes that. pic.twitter.com/MDb4wiZPEi — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 27, 2026 Sorry Bill… Sorry Hill… No one is buying your BS anymore!

As Hillary and Bill Clinton are drug into Congress to testify about their ties to Jeffrey Epstein, I thought it was a good time to flash back to this…. Because there are a couple things over the past 10+ years that I still can’t quite wrap my head around. The first are those envelopes that were passed out during the George Bush Sr. funeral. And the second is that time Hillary malfunctioned and started having a seizure and was suddenly thrown into a black van like a slab of raw meat. Remember this? Remember, they didn’t call an ambulance… they just chucked Crooked Hillary in the van like she was late for Gitmo. Still the gift that keeps on giving! pic.twitter.com/vuN0u0Rd3V — Anna (@realAnn_29) February 27, 2026 What was really going on that day? Perhaps this? Hillary Clinton — Suddenly It All Makes Sense For over a decade, we’ve told you Hillary Clinton is batshit crazy. Not just because I don’t like her or disagree with her politics, surely all of that is true too. But her behavior was objectively off the charts “Coo coo for Cocoa Puffs”. It was plainly obvious for anyone with eyes to see, just like I believe one day I will be writing an article just like this one after it is revealed in the future that someone in a mask was playing Joe Biden, at least at certain times and in certain places (Exhibit A: the Ballsack Chin). Now back to Hillary… Tulsi Gabbard just told us the myriad of medical issues and drugs Hillary has been under, and it seems like it should be enough to kill a horse. How she even survived these last 10 years is beyond me. Watch here: Tulsi Gabbard drops bombshell: DNC emails revealed Hillary’s emotional instability & daily use of heavy tranquilizers.

I told you a couple days ago that if you wanted to truly measure how much President Trump is winning, all you need to do is look at how severely the Democrats are melting down. And no one is melting down more than James Carville. Just a few days ago, he went on a long, demonic, profanity-laden rant against President Trump. Now today he has just posted another truly bizarre rant trying to mimic what will happen on election night of Midterms 2026. Someone get this man some medication! Watch here: NEW: James Carville GOES OFF RAILS with *BIZARRE* 2026 election night fantasy “Trump is in the Lincoln Bedroom throwing FECES at the wall! I know he throws ketchup at the wall — but this is the first time that we’ve had reports of him throwing actual SH*T!”@DailyCaller pic.twitter.com/rlLU87luY9 — Jason Cohen (@JasonJournoDC) February 27, 2026 FULL TRANSCRIPT: James Carville: Good evening, and welcome to election night, November the year 2026. This is your host, James Carville, with the YouTube Politicon Network, and we’ll be covering elections tonight. We’re gonna start with, on the East Coast, returns are starting to pour in, and right now, first, I want to go to Maine. Our correspondent on the ground is in Portland, Maine right now, Pollyanna Cassandra. Polly, how you doing tonight? Great. What are you hearing out of Maine, specifically from Senator Susan Collins? She’s running 16 points behind in the early returns, and have you heard anything about her mood? Excuse me? Her staff is describing her as, quote, “concerned,” unquote. Yeah. She’s concerned. Oh, my God. In the great state of Pennsylvania, we see that Governor Josh Shapiro is on track to win reelection by, get this, 18.5 points. That is what our quants are projecting in our special UNIVAC computer room that goes through this and digests it as we’re going through. We’re moving on, and let’s go to North Carolina. Former Governor Roy Cooper is again, looks like he’s gonna be somewhere between a 15 and 20 point win before the night is over. Let’s take off. Let’s go right to the great state of Florida where we have our great correspondent Jack Uoff. How you doing, Jack? Good to see you, Mr. Uoff. What are you seeing down there in the state of Florida? Oh, my God. You’re seeing big, big—it looks like David Jolly, former Republican congressman turned Democrat, is gonna be the next governor of Florida. And in the Senate race, Senator Moody, who in the fuck has ever heard of Senator Moody? But she is apparently gonna be defeated. She was appointed by Governor DeSantis to replace Marco Rubio, and is gonna be defeated by American hero, Colonel Alexander Vindman. Congratulations, Colonel Vindman. You’ll be joining the United States Senate. Now, I want to go to Miss Bea Dimitri. Bea is in Columbia, South Carolina. We’re getting returns now in the great state of South Carolina, and what are you seeing down there, Bea? Oh, my God. You mean Dr. Annie Andrews is gonna defeat the sycophant, the pliable, the idiotic, the gross, Lindsey Graham? Does that look like the case? Has anybody been able to get a quote from Senator Graham concerning the night’s events? Come in, Bea. What are you hearing? He’s, excuse me? You say he’s taking a steam at a bathhouse down the street, and he’s weeping piteously. Well, I guess that’s kind of it. If you remember, Senator Graham was very vulgar in the presence of the Danish prime minister to the point of embarrassing himself and the entire public of the United States. And now we’re gonna go to the White House. We’re gonna try to get an inside report. We got my good friend, our all-world correspondent, Lope de Meaux. Lope, how are you today at the White House? Great. Have anybody said anything thus far on this election night? No. It’s complete silence. Wait a minute. What did you hear? What now? Say that again. Lope says, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t know if this can’t be verified, so understand that, but he’s heard internal reports from his sources in the White House. He’s heard that Trump is in the Lincoln Bedroom throwing feces at the wall. That sounds—but I know he throws ketchup at the wall, but this is the first time that we’ve had reports of him throwing actual shit at the wall. But that seems to kind of move us in. We’re gonna continue our election night coverage as we go forward, but this great call-out to all of our great correspondents on this historic election night in the November of the year 2026. And we’ll be back with more returns as the night progresses. Thank you very much. Unhinged does not even begin to describe it, although I guess he’s getting views? Is that the point all along? The only point? Because it’s surely not to be coherent or respectable. RELATED REPORT: James Carville Goes On Absolutely UNHINGED, Profanity-Laced Tirade Against President Trump “Unhinged” really does not even begin to describe the new 5-minute video James Carville just posted directly speaking to President Trump. It almost looks like a demon is manifesting through him the way his face contorts and you just see pure rage seeping out. This is not normal! See for yourself: